Vertrauen in KI kalibrieren

Literatur

1 Russell, S.; Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence – A Modern Approach: Prentice-Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2010Suche in Google Scholar

2 Dellermann, D.; Calma, A.; Lipusch, N.; Weber, T.; Weigel, S.; Ebel, P.: The Future of Human-AI Collaboration: A Taxonomy of Design Knowledge for Hybrid Intelligence Systems. Conference: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2019 DOI:10.24251/HICSS.2019.03410.24251/HICSS.2019.034Suche in Google Scholar

3 Heimberger, H.; Jäger, A.; Maloca, S.: Künstliche Intelligenz in der Produktion: Modernisierung der Produktion. 83. Mitteilung aus der ISI-Erhebung. Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe 2024Suche in Google Scholar

4 Parker, S.; Grote, G.: Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World. Applied Psychology 71 (2022) 4, S. 1171–1204 DOI:10.1111/apps.1224110.1111/apps.12241Suche in Google Scholar

5 Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (DGUV): DGUV Barometer Arbeitswelt 2025: KI in der Arbeitswelt – DGUV Barometer Arbeitswelt 2025. Online unter https://www.dguv.de/medien/inhalt/mediencenter/pm/pressearchiv/2025/quartal_2/22742_dguv_barometer_ki_anwendungen.pdf [Abruf am 30.03.2025]Suche in Google Scholar

6 Visser, E. de; Peeters, M.; Jung, M.; Kohn, S.; Shaw, T.; Pak, R.; Neerincx, M.: Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams. International Journal of Social Robotics 12 (2020) 2, S. 459–478 DOI:10.1007/s12369-019-00596-x10.1007/s12369-019-00596-xSuche in Google Scholar

7 Lee, J; See, K.: Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors 46 (2004) 1, S. 50–80 DOI:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.3039210.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392Suche in Google Scholar

8 Mayer, R; Davis, J; Schoorman, F.: An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review 20 (1995) 3, S. 709 DOI:10.2307/25879210.2307/258792Suche in Google Scholar

9 Hoff, K.; Bashir, M.: Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust. Human Factors 57 (2015) 3, S. 407–434 DOI:10.1177/001872081454757010.1177/0018720814547570Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10 Ashoori, M.; Weisz, J.: In AI We Trust? Factors That Influence Trustworthiness of AI-infused Decision-Making Processes. arXiv 2019Suche in Google Scholar

11 Schlicker, N.; Baum, K.; Uhde, A.; Sterz, S.; Hirsch, M.; Langer, M.: How Do We Assess the Trustworthiness of AI? Introducing the Trustworthiness Assessment Model (TrAM). Computers in Human Behavior 170 (2025) 1, 108671 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2025.10867110.1016/j.chb.2025.108671Suche in Google Scholar

12 Funder, D.: On the Accuracy of Personality Judgment: A Realistic Approach. Psychological Review 102 (1995) 4, S. 652–670 DOI:10.1037//0033-295X.102.4.65210.1037//0033-295X.102.4.652Suche in Google Scholar

13 Nourani, M.; Roy, C.; Block, J.; Honeycutt, D.; Rahman, T.; Ragan, E.; Gogate, V.: Anchoring Bias Affects Mental Model Formation and User Reliance in Explainable AI Systems. In: Hammond, T.; Verbert, K.; Parra, D.; Knijnenburg, B.; O‘Donovan, J.; Teale, P. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 26^th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ‚21). ACM, New York, NY, USA 2021, S. 340–350 DOI:10.1145/3397481.345063910.1145/3397481.3450639Suche in Google Scholar

14 Zhang, Y.; Liao, Q.; Bellamy, R.: Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-assisted Decision Making. In: Hildebrandt, M.; Castillo, C.; Celis, E.; Ruggieri, S.; Taylor, L.; Zanfir-Fortuna, G. (Hrsg.): Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FACCT ‚20). ACM, New York, NY, USA 2020, S. 295–305 DOI:10.1145/3351095.337285210.1145/3351095.3372852Suche in Google Scholar

15 Buçinca, Z.; Malaya, M.; Gajos, K.: To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making. In: Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2021), Volume 5, Issue CSCW1, Article No.: 188, S 1–21 DOI:10.1145/344928710.1145/3449287Suche in Google Scholar

16 Merritt, S.; Ilgen, D.: Not All Trust Is Created Equal: Dispositional and History-based Trust in Human-Automation Interactions. Human Factors 50 (2008) 2, S. 194–210 DOI:10.1518/001872008X28857410.1518/001872008X288574Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17 Ferronato, P.; Bashir, M.: An Examination of Dispositional Trust in Human and Autonomous System Interactions. In: Kurosu, M. (Hrsg.): Human-Computer Interaction – Human Values and Quality of Life. Springer International Publishing, Cham 2020, S. 420–43510.1007/978-3-030-49065-2_30Suche in Google Scholar

18 Riedl, R.; Javor, A.: The Biology of Trust: Integrating Evidence from Genetics, Endocrinology, and Functional Brain Imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 5 (2012) 2, S. 63–91 DOI:10.1037/a002631810.1037/a0026318Suche in Google Scholar

19 Colquitt, J.; Scott, B.; LePine, J.: Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Metaanalytic Test of Their Unique Relationships with Risk Taking and Job Performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (2007) 4, S. 909–927 DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.90910.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20 Mcknight, D.; Carter, M.; Thatcher, J.; Clay, P.: Trust in a Specific Technology. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 2 (2011) 2, S. 1–25 DOI:10.1145/1985347.198535310.1145/1985347.1985353Suche in Google Scholar

21 Ayoub, J.; Yang, X.; Zhou, F.: Modeling Dispositional and Initial Learned Trust in Automated Vehicles with Predictability and Explainability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 77 (2021), S. 102–116 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2020.12.01510.1016/j.trf.2020.12.015Suche in Google Scholar

22 Parasuraman, R.; Riley, V.: Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse. Human Factors 39 (1997) 2, S. 230–253 DOI:10.1518/00187209777854388610.1518/001872097778543886Suche in Google Scholar

23 Korsgaard, M.; Kautz, J.; Bliese, P.; Samson, K.; Kostyszyn, P.: Conceptualising Time as a Level of Analysis: New Directions in the Analysis of Trust Dynamics. Journal of Trust Research 8 (2018) 2, S. 142–165 DOI:10.1080/21515581.2018.151655710.1080/21515581.2018.1516557Suche in Google Scholar

24 Alonso, V.; La Puente, P. de: System Transparency in Shared Autonomy: A Mini Review. Frontiers in Neurorobotics 12 (2018), S. 83 DOI:10.3389/fnbot.2018.0008310.3389/fnbot.2018.00083Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25 Hancock, P.; Kessler, T.; Kaplan, A.; Stowers, K.; Brill, J.; Billings, D.; Schaefer, K.; Szalma, J.: How and Why Humans Trust: A Meta-Analysis and Elaborated Model. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 1081086 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.108108610.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081086Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26 O‘Neill, T.; McNeese, N.; Barron, A.; Schelble, B.: Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Human Factors 64 (2022) 5, S. 904–938 DOI:10.1177/001872082096086510.1177/0018720820960865Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27 Müller, L.; Hertel, G.: Trusting Information Systems in Everyday Work Events – Effects on Cognitive Resources, Performance, and Well-Being. Ergonomics 68 (2025) 1, S. 19–36 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2023.228691010.1080/00140139.2023.2286910Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28 McDermott, P.; Brink, R. ten: Practical Guidance for Evaluating Calibrated Trust. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 63 (2019) 1, S. 362–366 DOI:10.1177/107118131963137910.1177/1071181319631379Suche in Google Scholar

29 Langer, M.; König, C.J.; Back, C.; Hemsing, V.: Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Comparing Trust Processes between Human and Automated Trustees in Light of Unfair Bias. Journal of Business and Psychology 38 (2023) 3, S. 493–50810.1007/s10869-022-09829-9Suche in Google Scholar

30 Esterwood, C.; Robert, L., Jr.: Three Strikes and You Are Out!: The Impacts of Multiple Muman-Robot Trust Violations and Repairs on Robot Trustworthiness. Computers in Human Behavior 142 (2023), 107658 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2023.10765810.1016/j.chb.2023.107658Suche in Google Scholar

31 Hoesterey, S.; Onnasch, L.: The Effect of Risk on Trust Attitude and Trust Behavior in Interaction with Information and Decision Automation.Cognition, Technology & Work 25 (2023) 1, S. 15–29 DOI:10.1007/s10111-022-00718-y10.1007/s10111-022-00718-ySuche in Google Scholar

32 Riegelsberger, J.; Sasse, M.; McCarthy, J.: The Mechanics of Trust: A Framework for Research and Design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62 (2005) 3, S. 381–422 DOI:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.01.00110.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.01.001Suche in Google Scholar

33 Manzey, D.; Reichenbach, J.; Onnasch, L.: Human Performance Consequences of Automated Decision Aids. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making 6 (2012) 1, S. 57–87 DOI:10.1177/155534341143384410.1177/1555343411433844Suche in Google Scholar

34 Seong, Y.; Bisantz, A.: The Impact of Cognitive Feedback on Judgment Performance and Trust with Decision Aids. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 38 (2008) 7-8, S. 608–625 DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.00710.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.007Suche in Google Scholar

35 Mosier, K.; Manzey, D.: Humans and Automated Decision Aids: A Match Made in Heaven? In: Mouloua, M; Hancock, P; Ferraro, J. (Hrsg.): Human Performance in Automated and Autonomous Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, 2019, S. 19–42 DOI:10.1201/9780429458330-210.1201/9780429458330-2Suche in Google Scholar

36 Tatasciore, M.; Strickland, L.; Loft, S.: Transparency Improves the Accuracy of Automation Use, but Automation Confidence Information Does Not. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 9 (2024) 1, S. 67 DOI:10.1186/s41235-024-00599-x10.1186/s41235-024-00599-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37 Parasuraman, R.; Miller, C.: Trust and Etiquette in High-Criticality Automated Systems. Commun. ACM 47 (2004) 4, S. 51–55 DOI:10.1145/975817.97584410.1145/975817.975844Suche in Google Scholar

38 Wickens, C.; Hollands, J.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2000Suche in Google Scholar

39 Berretta, S.; Tausch, A.; Ontrup, G.; Gilles, B.; Peifer, C.; Kluge, A.: Defining Human-AI Teaming the Human-centered Way: A Scoping Review and Network Analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 6 (2023), 1250725 DOI:10.3389/frai.2023.125072510.3389/frai.2023.1250725Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40 Rieger, T.; Manzey, D.; Meussling, B.; Onnasch, L.; Roesler, E.: Be Careful What You Explain: Benefits and Costs of Explainable AI in a Simulated Medical Task. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 1 (2023) 2, 100021 DOI:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.10002110.1016/j.chbah.2023.100021Suche in Google Scholar

41 Jian, J.-Y.; Bisantz, A.; Drury, C.: Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4 (2000) 1, S. 53–71 DOI:10.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_0410.1207/S15327566IJCE0401_04Suche in Google Scholar

42 Malle, B.; Ullman, D.: A Multidimensional Conception and Measure of Human-Robot Trust. In: Nam, S.; Lyons, J. (Hrsg.): Trust in Human-Robot Interaction. Elsevier 2021, S. 3–25 DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-819472-0.00001-010.1016/B978-0-12-819472-0.00001-0Suche in Google Scholar

43 Wischnewski, M.; Doebler, P.; Krämer, N.: Development and Validation of the Trust in AI Scale (TAIS). OSF (2025) DOI:10.31234/osf.io/eqa9y_v110.31234/osf.io/eqa9y_v1Suche in Google Scholar