Home Taste and meaning
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Taste and meaning

  • Ugo Volli EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 12, 2016

Abstract

A basic anthropological fact is that, although hunger is a constant experience in human history, not everything that from a biochemical point of view could be nutritious, in fact is eaten. In every human culture, food, not unlike language, is controlled by rich sets of rules that establish obligations and prohibitions, contextual bonds to time, and circumstances and syntactic structures for different types of meal. Often these rules – as well as linguistic ones – are unconscious, taken as “natural.” All of these rules detach food from its simple and natural properties, and give it some meaning, although this meaning is not easy to define, making food more similar to a self-referential mark than to a regular text. In this paper I analyze a specific case of these almost linguistic alimentary systems, the set of the dietary laws in the Jewish tradition and in particular its complex alimentary interdictions. The hierarchical structure of these rules is discussed and the problem of the connected effects of sense is addressed.

References

Bonfil, Roberto (ed.). 1962. Haggadà di Pésach. Milan: Editrice Fondazione Sally Mayer.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar

Capatti, Alberto & Massimo Montanari. 2002. La cucina italiana: Storia di una cultura. Rome & Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Deutscher, Guy. 2006. The unfolding of language. London: Arrow.Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. 1972. Decifering a meal. Daedalus 101(1). 61–81.Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. 1993. In the wilderness: The doctrine of defilement in the Book of Numbers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. 1999. Leviticus as literature. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Elias, Norbert. 1939. Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen, 2 vols. Basel: Verlag Haus zum Falken.Search in Google Scholar

Ferraro, Guido & Manuela Tartari. 1999. Al sangue o ben cotto. Rome: Meltemi.Search in Google Scholar

Flandrin, Jean-Luois. 1983. Le goȗt et la necessité: Sur l’usage des graisses dans les cuisines de l’Europe occidentale. Paris: Annales.10.3406/ahess.1983.410982Search in Google Scholar

Fontanille, Jacques. 2011. Corps et sens. Paris: PUF.10.3917/puf.jacq.2011.01Search in Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. 1790. Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären. Gotha: Carl Wilhelm Ettinger.10.5962/bhl.title.127448Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1987. De l’imperfection. Paris: Pierre Fanlac.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Marvin. 1985. Good to eat. New York: Simon and Shuster.Search in Google Scholar

Havelock, Eric. 1978. The Greek concept of justice: From its shadow in Homer to its substance in Plato. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674183513Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1963 [1790]. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Stuttgart: Philpp Reclam.10.28937/978-3-7873-2069-1Search in Google Scholar

Landowski, Eric. 2000. Gusti e disgusti: Sociosemiotica del quotidiano. Turin: Testo & Immagine editore.Search in Google Scholar

Landowski, Eric. 2003. Passions sans nom. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar

Landowski, Eric. 2013. Pour une sémiotique du Gout, Documentoss de Estudio. Sao Paulo: Centro de Pesquisas sociosemioticas.Search in Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1964. Mythologiques, I: Le Cru et le cuit. Paris: Plon.Search in Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1967. Mythologiques, II: Du miel aux cendres. Paris: Plon.Search in Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1968. Mythologiques, III: L’Origine des manières de table. Paris: Plon.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Yurij. 1990. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. London: Tauris.Search in Google Scholar

Manetti, Giovanni, Paolo Bertetti & Alessandro Prato (eds.). 2006. Semiofood: Comunicazione e cultura del cibo. Turin: Centro scientifico editore.Search in Google Scholar

Moulin, Léo. 1975. L’Europe à table. Bruxelles: Elsevier Séquoia.Search in Google Scholar

Ong, Walter. 1982. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203328064Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1992. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), N. Hauser & C. Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 1 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 1.]Search in Google Scholar

Piperno, Gaia & Deborah Cohenca. 2008. Mangio kashèr. Milan: Morashà.Search in Google Scholar

Prieto, Luis. 1964. Principes de noologie: Fondements de la théorie fonctionnelle du signifié. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Prieto, Luis. 1975. Pertinence et pratique. Paris: Minuit.Search in Google Scholar

Sahlins, Marshall. 1978. Culture and practical reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226161792.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Segre, Anna (ed.). 2001. La pasqua ebraica. Turin: Silvio Zamorani Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Simmons, Frederick J. 1994. Eat not this flesh: Food avoidances from prehistory to the present, 2nd edn. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ungerer, Friedrich. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Volli, Ugo. 1988. Contro la moda. Milan: Feltrinelli.Search in Google Scholar

Volli, Ugo. 2010. Zeker: Per una semiotica della memoria teologico-politica. In Maria Pia Pozzato (ed.), Testi e mamoria: Semiotica e costruzione politica dei fatti, 113–133. Bologna: Il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Volli, Ugo. 2011. L’immaginario delle origini. Lexia 07(08). 3–61.Search in Google Scholar

Voltaire (Arouet Francois Marie). 1968. Œuvres complètes de Voltaire: Correspondence and related documents, Theodore Besterman (ed.). Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-5-12
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 19.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0106/pdf
Scroll to top button