Home Food design: Symbols of our daily nutrition
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Food design: Symbols of our daily nutrition

  • Sonja Stummerer EMAIL logo and Martin Hablesreiter
Published/Copyright: May 19, 2016

Abstract

Food is brought to our tables in an endless array of shapes, colors, and recipes – it is designed. We transform food for greater pleasure, and for practical purposes such as longer storage life, but also to convey values and tell myths. Food design helps to pass on cultural information collected by former generations and provides structures how to lay out life. Symbolically charged bread is one of the oldest examples of food design. Some of the ancient motifs have survived until today, for example the plaited pastry or the croissant. In ancient Greece, curved pastry symbolized the crescent moon and was used as an offering to the moon goddess. Plaited bread presumably replaced an earlier practice of sacrificing one’s own hair. Traditional food is not a question of good taste, nor of age or originality, but how it conforms to our cultural standards and confirms our views of existence. The conveyance of symbolic contents and higher cultural values is a fundamental issue when it comes to successful food. The Surprise Egg is a modern example of how age-old myths like metamorphosis, birth, and new life can be used to connect a food to a higher symbolic universe and charge it with “extra” sense far beyond simple classifications like “tasty” or “nourishing.” In this paper we present research about the origin of the shapes and forms our food comes in, the factors playing a role in its design and who it is that actually decides what the things we eat every day are like.

References

Barilla, Guido (ed.). 2001. Pasta: History, technologies, and secrets of Italian tradition. Parma: Barilla Alimentare S.p.A.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1997 [1961]. Toward a psychosociology of contemporary food consumption. In Carole Counihan & Penny Van Esterik (eds.), Food and culture: A reader, 3rd edn., 23–30. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Döbler, Hanns Ferdinand. 2002. Kochkünste und Tafelfreuden. Munich: Orbis.Search in Google Scholar

Eiselen, Hermann (ed.). 2000. Max Währen: Gesammelte Aufsätze und Studien zur Brot – und Gebäckkunde und – geschichte 1940–1999. Ulm: Deutsches Brotmuseum Ulm.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Hans Jürgen. 1968. Kunstgeschichte des Backwerks. Hamburg: Gerhard Stalling Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Karmasin, Helene. 2000. Die geheime Botschaft unserer Speisen. Munich: Kunstmann.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenzer, Alfred. 1981. Das Konzil der Buchhalter: Die Zerstörung der Sinnlichkeit, eine Religionskritik. Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Search in Google Scholar

Meier, Cordula. 2001. Design Theorie, Beiträge zu einer Disziplin. Wetzlar: Anabas.Search in Google Scholar

Moulin, Leo. 2002. Les liturgies de la table: Une histoire culturelle du mange et du boire. Antwerpen: Mercatorfonds.Search in Google Scholar

Pudel, Volker. 2005. Sicherheit und Lebensqualität durch sensorische Lust. In Dietrich von Engelhardt & Ranier Wild (eds.), Geschmackskulturen, Vom Sinn der Sinne, 59–70. New York & Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Christoph. 1996a. Süßes Gold: Kultur- und Sozialgeschichte des Wiener Zuckers. Vienna: Christian Brandstätter.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Christoph. 1996b. Das Lexikon der Wiener Küche. Vienna: Deutike.10.1007/978-3-476-03720-6_288Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, Christoph. 2006. Prato: Die gute alte Küche. Vienna: Pichler Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-5-19
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0101/html
Scroll to top button