Home Mathematics Some new Fejér type inequalities for (h, g; α - m)-convex functions
Article Open Access

Some new Fejér type inequalities for (h, g; α - m)-convex functions

  • Ghulam Farid , Sanja Kovač EMAIL logo , Josip Pečarić and Mihaela Ribičić Penava
Published/Copyright: August 5, 2025

Abstract

The study of ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions extends the classical concept of convexity to more generalized forms, which provide flexible tools for analysis. The aim of this article is to yield the generalization of the Fejér type inequalities for various classes of convex functions, such as ( h , g ; α m ) -convex and ( h , g ; m ) -convex functions.

MSC 2010: 26D10; 26D15; 26D20; 26D99

1 Introduction

Convex functions play a pivotal role in various fields of applied mathematics, such as optimization, economics, and probability theory due to their desirable mathematical properties and wide applicability. First, let us recall the definition of a convex function.

Definition 1

A function f : I R R is said to be convex function if

(1.1) f ( λ x + ( 1 λ ) y ) λ f ( x ) + ( 1 λ ) f ( y )

holds for all points x and y in I and all λ [ 0 , 1 ] .

It is called strictly convex if the inequality (1.1) holds strictly whenever x and y are distinct points and λ ( 0 , 1 ) . If f is convex (respectively, strictly convex), then we say that f is concave (respectively, strictly concave). If f is both convex and concave, then f is said to be affine.

Let us recall famous Fejér inequalities for convex functions.

Theorem 1

(The Fejér inequalities) Let w : [ a , b ] R be nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . If f : [ a , b ] R is a convex function, then

(1.2) f a + b 2 a b w ( x ) d x a b w ( x ) f ( x ) d x 1 2 f ( a ) + 1 2 f ( b ) a b w ( x ) d x .

If f is a concave function, then inequalities in (1.2) are reversed.

In mathematical analysis, Fejér-type inequalities are important, especially when studying integral inequalities and their applications. These inequalities have been extensively studied and refined, providing essential tools for evaluating integral expressions and establishing bounds in both pure and applied mathematics. Many expansions and modifications in different directions are based on the classical Fejér inequality. Some new inequalities of the Fejér type were obtained in [13].

A new class of convex functions was introduced in [4].

Definition 2

Let h : J R R be a nonnegative function. We say that f : [ 0 , b ] R is a ( h m ) -convex function, if f is nonnegative and for all x , y [ 0 , b ] , m [ 0 , 1 ] , and α ( 0 , 1 ) , we have

(1.3) f ( α x + m ( 1 α ) y ) h ( α ) f ( x ) + m h ( 1 α ) f ( y ) .

If the inequality (1.3) is reversed, then f is said to be ( h m ) -concave function on [ 0 , b ] .

Obviously, if we choose m = 1 , then we have h -convex functions. If we choose h ( x ) = x , then we obtain nonnegative m -convex functions. If we choose m = 1 and h ( x ) = x , 1 , 1 x , x s , then we obtain the following classes of functions: nonnegative convex functions, P -functions, Godunova-Levin functions, and s -convex functions (in the second sense), respectively.

The following new class of ( h , g ; m ) -convex function has been introduced in [5].

Definition 3

Let h be a nonnegative function on J R , ( 0 , 1 ) J , h 0 , and let g be a positive function on I R . Furthermore, let m ( 0 , 1 ] . A function f : I R is said to be an ( h , g ; m ) -convex function if it is nonnegative and if

(1.4) f ( λ x + m ( 1 λ ) y ) h ( λ ) f ( x ) g ( x ) + m h ( 1 λ ) f ( y ) g ( y )

holds for all x , y I and all λ ( 0 , 1 ) . If (1.4) holds in the reversed sense, then f is said to be an ( h , g ; m ) -concave function.

The second Fejér inequality has been improved for ( h , g ; m ) -convex functions [6,7]:

Theorem 2

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(1.5) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m + m f b m g b m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

In the article, we will use the following property of the minimum:

(1.6) min { a , b } = a + b a b 2 ,

from which we have

(1.7) min { a , b } a + b 2 .

Power mean of two numbers a , b is

M p ( a , b ) = a p + b p 2 1 p .

Specially, for p = 1 we have arithmetic mean

M 1 ( a , b ) = a + b 2 ,

for p = 1 harmonic mean

M 1 ( a , b ) = 2 1 a + 1 b ,

for p = 2 quadratic mean

M 2 ( a , b ) = a 2 + b 2 2 ,

for p = 0 geometric mean

M 0 ( a , b ) = a b ,

for p = minimum

M ( a , b ) = min { a , b }

and for p = maximum

M ( a , b ) = max { a , b } .

The following inequalities are valid:

(1.8) M ( a , b ) M p ( a , b ) M ( a , b )

and

(1.9) M p ( a , b ) M q ( a , b ) , for p < q .

The two means M p ( a , b ) and M q ( a , b ) are equal if and only if a = b .

This article aims to present the improvement of the second Fejér inequality for ( h , g ; m ) -convex and ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions. Likewise, we will show that these new results are generalizations of already known results related to various classes of convex functions, such as ( h m ) -convex, h -convex, m -convex, and nonnegative convex functions.

2 Main result

Here is improvement of the second Fejér inequality for ( h , g ; m ) -convex function obtained in [7].

Theorem 3

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.1) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x min f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -concave function, then the following inequality holds:

(2.2) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x max f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) . First, we have

f ( x ) = f b x b a a + m x a b a b m

and

f ( a + b x ) = f b x b a b + m x a b a a m .

From the fact that f is ( h , g ; m ) -convex function, we have

(2.3) f b x b a a + m x a b a b m h b x b a f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h x a b a f b m g b m

and

(2.4) f b x b a b + m x a b a a m h b x b a f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h x a b a f a m g a m .

Integrating on [ a , b ] , we have

(2.5) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x = a b f b x b a a + m x a b a b m w ( x ) d x a b h b x b a f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h x a b a f b m g b m w ( x ) d x = f ( a ) g ( a ) a b h b x b a w ( x ) d x + m f b m g b m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x

and

(2.6) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x = a b f b x b a b + m x a b a a m w ( x ) d x a b h b x b a f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h x a b a f a m g a m w ( x ) d x = f ( b ) g ( b ) a b h b x b a w ( x ) d x + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Since w is symmetric, it is easy to check that

a b h b x b a w ( x ) d x = a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Hence, we have

(2.7) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x

and

(2.8) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x ,

so the inequality (2.1) is proved.

Now, let us prove the inequality (2.2). For ( h , g ; m ) -concave function f , the following inequality holds:

(2.9) f ( λ x + m ( 1 λ ) y ) h ( λ ) f ( x ) g ( x ) + m h ( 1 λ ) f ( y ) g ( y ) , λ ( 0 , 1 ) .

Further, we use the substitutions:

(2.10) x = b x b a a + x a b a b

and

(2.11) a + b x = b x b a b + x a b a a

to express f ( x ) and f ( a + b x ) in forms suitable for applying the inequality (2.9). Hence, we obtain:

f ( x ) h b x b a f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h x a b a f b m g b m

and

f ( a + b x ) h b x b a f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h x a b a f a m g a m .

By integrating both inequalities over [ a , b ] and using the symmetry of w , we obtain:

a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x , a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Therefore, inequality (2.2) follows by taking the maximum of the two lower bounds.□

Remark 1

If we use (1.7), we obtain:

(2.12) min f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m 1 2 f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m + m f b m g b m ,

so the Theorem 3 is the improvement of the Theorem 2.

Corollary 1

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -concave function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.13) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We use inequality (1.8) with p = 1 to obtain

(2.14)□ max f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m 1 2 f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m + m f b m g b m .

Now we shall give the special cases of the Theorem 3 by using special classes of convex functions.

Corollary 2

Let f be a nonnegative ( h m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 and m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.15) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x min f ( a ) + m f b m , f ( b ) + m f a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative ( h m ) -concave function, then the following inequality holds:

(2.16) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x max f ( a ) + m f b m , f ( b ) + m f a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We apply Theorem 3 for g ( x ) = 1 to obtain the result.□

Corollary 3

Let f be a nonnegative h -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 . Let 0 a < b < and f , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.17) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative h -concave, then the following inequality holds:

(2.18) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We apply Theorem 3 for m = 1 and g = 1 to obtain the result.□

Corollary 4

Let f be a nonnegative m -convex function on [ 0 , ) , for m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.19) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 min f ( a ) + m f b m , f ( b ) + m f a m a b x a b a w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative m -concave function, then the following inequality holds:

(2.20) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 max f ( a ) + m f b m , f ( b ) + m f a m a b x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We apply Theorem 3 for h ( x ) = x and g = 1 to obtain the result.□

The following corollary is the second Fejér inequality for nonnegative convex and concave functions.

Corollary 5

Let f be a nonnegative convex function on [ 0 , ) . Let 0 a < b < and f L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.21) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 a b w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative concave function on [ 0 , ) , then the following inequality holds:

(2.22) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 a b w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We apply Theorem 3 for m = 1 , h ( x ) = x and g = 1 to obtain the result.□

3 Further generalization to the ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions

In this section, we shall give the further generalization of the previous results to the class of the ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions (see [8], Definition 2.1. by setting c = 0 ).

Definition 4

Let h be a nonnegative function on J R , ( 0 , 1 ) J , h 0 and let g be a positive function on I R and α , m ( 0 , 1 ] . A function f : I R is said to be ( h , g ; α m ) -convex if it is nonnegative and satisfies the following inequality:

(3.1) f ( λ x + m ( 1 λ ) y ) h ( λ α ) f ( x ) g ( x ) + m h ( 1 λ α ) f ( y ) g ( y )

for all λ ( 0 , 1 ) and all x , y I .

If we rewrite the aforementioned definition in the following form:

(3.2) f ( x ) h b x b a α f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h 1 b x b a α f b m g b m

and

(3.3) f ( x ) h x a b a α f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h 1 x a b a α f a m g a m ,

then we have

(3.4) f ( x ) min h b x b a α f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h 1 b x b a α f b m g b m , h x a b a α f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h 1 x a b a α f a m g a m .

Theorem 4

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and α , m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(3.5) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x min f ( a ) g ( a ) I 1 + m f b m g b m I 2 , f ( b ) g ( b ) I 1 + m f a m g a m I 2 ,

where

I 1 = a b h b x b a α w ( x ) d x

and

I 2 = a b h 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

For a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function f, the inequality in (3.5) is reversed by using the maximum instead of the minimum.

Proof

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) . Then we have:

(3.6) f ( x ) min h b x b a α f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h 1 b x b a α f b m g b m , h x a b a α f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h 1 x a b a α f a m g a m .

Now, since w is symmetric with respect to a + b 2 , we have

(3.7) I 1 = a b h b x b a α w ( x ) d x = a b h x a b a α w ( x ) d x

and

(3.8) I 2 = a b h 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x = a b h 1 x a b a α w ( x ) d x ,

so by using (3.6), we obtain

(3.9) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x a b min h b x b a α f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h 1 b x b a α f b m g b m , h x a b a α f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h 1 x a b a α f a m g a m w ( x ) d x min f ( a ) g ( a ) I 1 + m f b m g b m I 2 , f ( b ) g ( b ) I 1 + m f a m g a m I 2 ,

which completes the proof of inequality (3.5).

Finally, if f is a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function, the inequality presented in (3.6) is reversed with the maximum substituting the minimum. Consequently, the inequality in (3.5) is also reversed with the maximum replacing the minimum.□

Remark 2

If we put α = 1 in Theorem 4, then ( h , g ; α m ) -convexity reduces to ( h , g ; m ) -convexity, so the inequality from Theorem 3 is obtained.

Corollary 6

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and α , m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(3.10) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) I 1 + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m I 2 .

where

I 1 = a b h b x b a α w ( x ) d x

and

I 2 = a b h 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

For a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function f , the inequality in (3.10) is reversed.

Proof

If f is nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex, we apply inequality (1.7) to the right-hand side of (3.5) to obtain

(3.11) min f ( a ) g ( a ) I 1 + m f b m g b m I 2 , f ( b ) g ( b ) I 1 + m f a m g a m I 2 1 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) I 1 + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m I 2 ,

which concludes the proof of inequality (3.10). On the other hand, if f is nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function, we use inequality (1.8) for p = 1 to obtain the assertion.□

Remark 3

If we put α = 1 in Corollary 6, then ( h , g ; α m ) -convexity reduces to ( h , g ; m ) -convexity, so the inequality from Theorem 2 is obtained.

In the following result, we consider additional assumptions for the function h .

Theorem 5

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative concave function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and α , m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Let us denote W a b w ( x ) d x . Then the following inequality holds

(3.12) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x W 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) h 1 W a b b x b a α w ( x ) d x + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m h 1 W a b 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

If f is a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function and h is a nonnegative convex function, the inequality in (3.12) is reversed.

Proof

First, let us assume that f is a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function and h is a nonnegative concave function. After applying the integral Jensen inequality, we have the following inequalities:

(3.13) I 1 = a b h b x b a α w ( x ) d x W h 1 W a b b x b a α w ( x ) d x

and

(3.14) I 2 = a b h 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x W h 1 W a b 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

Now, after applying (3.13) and (3.14) to the inequality (3.10), we obtain

(3.15) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) I 1 + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m I 2 W 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) h 1 W a b b x b a α w ( x ) d x + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m h 1 W a b 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

Hence, the proof in this case is finished.

In the second case, we apply the Jensen’s integral inequality to the convex function h and derive the reversed forms of inequalities in (3.13) and (3.14). Analogously, we use those bounds to the reversed version of the inequality (3.10) to complete the proof.□

In this section, we have established new Fejér-type integral inequalities for the class of ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions, thereby providing a comprehensive generalization of existing results within the framework of generalized convexity.

4 Conclusion

In this study, the several new Fejér-type inequalities for ( h , g ; m ) -convex functions have been established. In addition, the application of the new inequalities on various types of convex types of functions are shown, such as ( h m ) -convex, h -convex, m -convex, and nonnegative convex functions. Further, some new Fejér type inequalities for ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions have been obtained. Our results generalize and extend classical inequalities, offering broader applicability in the field of integral inequalities.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that significantly enhanced this work.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no external funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during this study.

References

[1] J. Barić, Lj. Kvesić, J. Pečarić, and M. Ribičić Penava, Fejér type inequalities for higher order convex functions and quadrature formulae, Aequationes Math. 96 (2022), no. 2, 417–430, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00010-021-00825-7. 10.1007/s00010-021-00825-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Jleli, Extension of Fejéras inequality to the class of sub-biharmonic functions, Open Math. 22 (2024), no. 1, 369–390, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2024-0035. 10.1515/math-2024-0035Search in Google Scholar

[3] S. S. Dragomir, M. Jleli, and B. Samet, On Fejér-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic k-convex functions, Demonstr. Math. 57 (2024), no 1, 171–215, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2024-0001. 10.1515/dema-2024-0001Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. E. Ozdemir, A. O. Akdemir, and E. Set, On (h−m)-convexity and Hadamard type inequalities, Transylv. J. Math. Mech. 8 (2016), no. 1, 51–58. Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Andrić and J. Pečarić, On (h,g;m)-convexity and the Hermite-Hadamard inequality, J. Convex Anal. 29 (2022), no. 1, 257–268. Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Andrić, Féjer type inequalities for (h,g;m)-convex functions, TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. 14 (2023), no. 2, 185–194, DOI: https://doi.org/10.30546/2219-1259.14.2.2023.185. 10.30546/2219-1259.14.2.2023.185Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. Andrić, V. Culjak, D. Pečarić, J. Pečarić, and J. Perić, New Developments for Jensen and Lah-Ribarič Inequalities, Element, Zagreb, 2023. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Y. Liu, G. Farid, J. Pečarić, J. Rod, M. Elamine, and S. Abdel-Khalek, Strongly (g,h;α−m)-convex functions and the consequent Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities, Appl. Math. Sci. Eng. 33 (2025), no. 1, 2471386, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/27690911.2025.2471386. 10.1080/27690911.2025.2471386Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-02-26
Revised: 2025-06-23
Accepted: 2025-06-30
Published Online: 2025-08-05

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. On I-convergence of nets of functions in fuzzy metric spaces
  2. Special Issue on Contemporary Developments in Graphs Defined on Algebraic Structures
  3. Forbidden subgraphs of TI-power graphs of finite groups
  4. Finite group with some c#-normal and S-quasinormally embedded subgroups
  5. Classifying cubic symmetric graphs of order 88p and 88p 2
  6. Two-sided zero-divisor graphs of orientation-preserving and order-decreasing transformation semigroups
  7. Simplicial complexes defined on groups
  8. Further results on permanents of Laplacian matrices of trees
  9. Algebra
  10. Classes of modules closed under projective covers
  11. On the dimension of the algebraic sum of subspaces
  12. Green's graphs of a semigroup
  13. On an uncertainty principle for small index subgroups of finite fields
  14. On a generalization of I-regularity
  15. Algorithm and linear convergence of the H-spectral radius of weakly irreducible quasi-positive tensors
  16. The hyperbolic CS decomposition of tensors based on the C-product
  17. On weakly classical 1-absorbing prime submodules
  18. Equational characterizations for some subclasses of domains
  19. Algebraic Geometry
  20. Spin(8, ℂ)-Higgs bundles fixed points through spectral data
  21. Embedding of lattices and K3-covers of an Enriques surface
  22. Kodaira-Spencer maps for elliptic orbispheres as isomorphisms of Frobenius algebras
  23. Applications in Computer and Information Sciences
  24. Dynamics of particulate emissions in the presence of autonomous vehicles
  25. Exploring homotopy with hyperspherical tracking to find complex roots with application to electrical circuits
  26. Category Theory
  27. The higher mapping cone axiom
  28. Combinatorics and Graph Theory
  29. 𝕮-inverse of graphs and mixed graphs
  30. On the spectral radius and energy of the degree distance matrix of a connected graph
  31. Some new bounds on resolvent energy of a graph
  32. Coloring the vertices of a graph with mutual-visibility property
  33. Ring graph induced by a ring endomorphism
  34. A note on the edge general position number of cactus graphs
  35. Complex Analysis
  36. Some results on value distribution concerning Hayman's alternative
  37. Freely quasiconformal and locally weakly quasisymmetric mappings in metric spaces
  38. A new result for entire functions and their shifts with two shared values
  39. On a subclass of multivalent functions defined by generalized multiplier transformation
  40. Singular direction of meromorphic functions with finite logarithmic order
  41. Growth theorems and coefficient bounds for g-starlike mappings of complex order λ
  42. Refinements of inequalities on extremal problems of polynomials
  43. Control Theory and Optimization
  44. Averaging method in optimal control problems for integro-differential equations
  45. On superstability of derivations in Banach algebras
  46. The robust isolated calmness of spectral norm regularized convex matrix optimization problems
  47. Observability on the classes of non-nilpotent solvable three-dimensional Lie groups
  48. Differential Equations
  49. The ill-posedness of the (non-)periodic traveling wave solution for the deformed continuous Heisenberg spin equation
  50. A note on the global existence and boundedness of an N-dimensional parabolic-elliptic predator-prey system with indirect pursuit-evasion interaction
  51. Blow-up of solutions for Euler-Bernoulli equation with nonlinear time delay
  52. Periodic or homoclinic orbit bifurcated from a heteroclinic loop for high-dimensional systems
  53. Regularity of weak solutions to the 3D stationary tropical climate model
  54. Local minimizers for the NLS equation with localized nonlinearity on noncompact metric graphs
  55. Global existence and blow-up of solutions to pseudo-parabolic equation for Baouendi-Grushin operator
  56. Bubbles clustered inside for almost-critical problems
  57. Existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for multiparameter periodic systems
  58. Existence of positive periodic solutions for evolution equations with delay in ordered Banach spaces
  59. On a nonlinear boundary value problems with impulse action
  60. Normalized ground-states for the Sobolev critical Kirchhoff equation with at least mass critical growth
  61. Multiple positive solutions to a p-Kirchhoff equation with logarithmic terms and concave terms
  62. Infinitely many solutions for a class of Kirchhoff-type equations
  63. Real and non-real eigenvalues of regular indefinite Sturm–Liouville problems
  64. Existence of global solutions to a semilinear thermoelastic system in three dimensions
  65. Limiting profile of positive solutions to heterogeneous elliptic BVPs with nonlinear flux decaying to negative infinity on a portion of the boundary
  66. Morse index of circular solutions for repulsive central force problems on surfaces
  67. Differential Geometry
  68. On tangent bundles of Walker four-manifolds
  69. Pedal and negative pedal surfaces of framed curves in the Euclidean 3-space
  70. Discrete Mathematics
  71. Eventually monotonic solutions of the generalized Fibonacci equations
  72. Dynamical Systems Ergodic Theory
  73. Dynamical properties of two-diffusion SIR epidemic model with Markovian switching
  74. A note on weighted measure-theoretic pressure
  75. Pullback attractors for a class of second-order delay evolution equations with dispersive and dissipative terms on unbounded domain
  76. Pullback attractor of the 2D non-autonomous magneto-micropolar fluid equations
  77. Functional Analysis
  78. Spectrum boundary domination of semiregularities in Banach algebras
  79. Approximate multi-Cauchy mappings on certain groupoids
  80. Investigating the modified UO-iteration process in Banach spaces by a digraph
  81. Tilings, sub-tilings, and spectral sets on p-adic space
  82. Continuity and essential norm of operators defined by infinite tridiagonal matrices in weighted Orlicz and l spaces
  83. A family of commuting contraction semigroups on l 1 ( N ) and l ( N )
  84. q-Stirling sequence spaces associated with q-Bell numbers
  85. Chlodowsky variant of Bernstein-type operators on the domain
  86. Hyponormality on a weighted Bergman space of an annulus with a general harmonic symbol
  87. Characterization of derivations on strongly double triangle subspace lattice algebras by local actions
  88. Fixed point approaches to the stability of Jensen’s functional equation
  89. Geometry
  90. The regularity of solutions to the Lp Gauss image problem
  91. Solving the quartic by conics
  92. Group Theory
  93. On a question of permutation groups acting on the power set
  94. A characterization of the translational hull of a weakly type B semigroup with E-properties
  95. Harmonic Analysis
  96. Eigenfunctions on an infinite Schrödinger network
  97. Maximal function and generalized fractional integral operators on the weighted Orlicz-Lorentz-Morrey spaces
  98. Subharmonic functions and associated measures in ℝn
  99. Mathematical Logic, Model Theory and Foundation
  100. A topology related to implication and upsets on a bounded BCK-algebra
  101. Boundedness of fractional sublinear operators on weighted grand Herz-Morrey spaces with variable exponents
  102. Number Theory
  103. Fibonacci vector and matrix p-norms
  104. Recurrence for probabilistic extension of Dowling polynomials
  105. Carmichael numbers composed of Piatetski-Shapiro primes in Beatty sequences
  106. The number of rational points of some classes of algebraic varieties over finite fields
  107. Classification and irreducibility of a class of integer polynomials
  108. Decompositions of the extended Selberg class functions
  109. Joint approximation of analytic functions by the shifts of Hurwitz zeta-functions in short intervals
  110. Fibonacci Cartan and Lucas Cartan numbers
  111. Recurrence relations satisfied by some arithmetic groups
  112. The hybrid power mean involving the Kloosterman sums and Dedekind sums
  113. Numerical Methods
  114. A modified predictor–corrector scheme with graded mesh for numerical solutions of nonlinear Ψ-caputo fractional-order systems
  115. A kind of univariate improved Shepard-Euler operators
  116. Probability and Statistics
  117. Statistical inference and data analysis of the record-based transmuted Burr X model
  118. Multiple G-Stratonovich integral in G-expectation space
  119. p-variation and Chung's LIL of sub-bifractional Brownian motion and applications
  120. Real Analysis
  121. Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and the univariate Lommel function: Integral representations
  122. Multiple solutions for a class of fourth-order elliptic equations with critical growth
  123. Majorization-type inequalities for (m, M, ψ)-convex functions with applications
  124. The evaluation of a definite integral by the method of brackets illustrating its flexibility
  125. Some new Fejér type inequalities for (h, g; α - m)-convex functions
  126. Some new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for product of strongly h-convex functions on ellipsoids and balls
  127. Topology
  128. Unraveling chaos: A topological analysis of simplicial homology groups and their foldings
  129. A generalized fixed-point theorem for set-valued mappings in b-metric spaces
  130. On SI2-convergence in T0-spaces
  131. Generalized quandle polynomials and their applications to stuquandles, stuck links, and RNA folding
Downloaded on 20.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2025-0184/html
Scroll to top button