Startseite Some new Fejér type inequalities for (h, g; α - m)-convex functions
Artikel Open Access

Some new Fejér type inequalities for (h, g; α - m)-convex functions

  • Ghulam Farid , Sanja Kovač EMAIL logo , Josip Pečarić und Mihaela Ribičić Penava
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. August 2025

Abstract

The study of ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions extends the classical concept of convexity to more generalized forms, which provide flexible tools for analysis. The aim of this article is to yield the generalization of the Fejér type inequalities for various classes of convex functions, such as ( h , g ; α m ) -convex and ( h , g ; m ) -convex functions.

MSC 2010: 26D10; 26D15; 26D20; 26D99

1 Introduction

Convex functions play a pivotal role in various fields of applied mathematics, such as optimization, economics, and probability theory due to their desirable mathematical properties and wide applicability. First, let us recall the definition of a convex function.

Definition 1

A function f : I R R is said to be convex function if

(1.1) f ( λ x + ( 1 λ ) y ) λ f ( x ) + ( 1 λ ) f ( y )

holds for all points x and y in I and all λ [ 0 , 1 ] .

It is called strictly convex if the inequality (1.1) holds strictly whenever x and y are distinct points and λ ( 0 , 1 ) . If f is convex (respectively, strictly convex), then we say that f is concave (respectively, strictly concave). If f is both convex and concave, then f is said to be affine.

Let us recall famous Fejér inequalities for convex functions.

Theorem 1

(The Fejér inequalities) Let w : [ a , b ] R be nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . If f : [ a , b ] R is a convex function, then

(1.2) f a + b 2 a b w ( x ) d x a b w ( x ) f ( x ) d x 1 2 f ( a ) + 1 2 f ( b ) a b w ( x ) d x .

If f is a concave function, then inequalities in (1.2) are reversed.

In mathematical analysis, Fejér-type inequalities are important, especially when studying integral inequalities and their applications. These inequalities have been extensively studied and refined, providing essential tools for evaluating integral expressions and establishing bounds in both pure and applied mathematics. Many expansions and modifications in different directions are based on the classical Fejér inequality. Some new inequalities of the Fejér type were obtained in [13].

A new class of convex functions was introduced in [4].

Definition 2

Let h : J R R be a nonnegative function. We say that f : [ 0 , b ] R is a ( h m ) -convex function, if f is nonnegative and for all x , y [ 0 , b ] , m [ 0 , 1 ] , and α ( 0 , 1 ) , we have

(1.3) f ( α x + m ( 1 α ) y ) h ( α ) f ( x ) + m h ( 1 α ) f ( y ) .

If the inequality (1.3) is reversed, then f is said to be ( h m ) -concave function on [ 0 , b ] .

Obviously, if we choose m = 1 , then we have h -convex functions. If we choose h ( x ) = x , then we obtain nonnegative m -convex functions. If we choose m = 1 and h ( x ) = x , 1 , 1 x , x s , then we obtain the following classes of functions: nonnegative convex functions, P -functions, Godunova-Levin functions, and s -convex functions (in the second sense), respectively.

The following new class of ( h , g ; m ) -convex function has been introduced in [5].

Definition 3

Let h be a nonnegative function on J R , ( 0 , 1 ) J , h 0 , and let g be a positive function on I R . Furthermore, let m ( 0 , 1 ] . A function f : I R is said to be an ( h , g ; m ) -convex function if it is nonnegative and if

(1.4) f ( λ x + m ( 1 λ ) y ) h ( λ ) f ( x ) g ( x ) + m h ( 1 λ ) f ( y ) g ( y )

holds for all x , y I and all λ ( 0 , 1 ) . If (1.4) holds in the reversed sense, then f is said to be an ( h , g ; m ) -concave function.

The second Fejér inequality has been improved for ( h , g ; m ) -convex functions [6,7]:

Theorem 2

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(1.5) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m + m f b m g b m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

In the article, we will use the following property of the minimum:

(1.6) min { a , b } = a + b a b 2 ,

from which we have

(1.7) min { a , b } a + b 2 .

Power mean of two numbers a , b is

M p ( a , b ) = a p + b p 2 1 p .

Specially, for p = 1 we have arithmetic mean

M 1 ( a , b ) = a + b 2 ,

for p = 1 harmonic mean

M 1 ( a , b ) = 2 1 a + 1 b ,

for p = 2 quadratic mean

M 2 ( a , b ) = a 2 + b 2 2 ,

for p = 0 geometric mean

M 0 ( a , b ) = a b ,

for p = minimum

M ( a , b ) = min { a , b }

and for p = maximum

M ( a , b ) = max { a , b } .

The following inequalities are valid:

(1.8) M ( a , b ) M p ( a , b ) M ( a , b )

and

(1.9) M p ( a , b ) M q ( a , b ) , for p < q .

The two means M p ( a , b ) and M q ( a , b ) are equal if and only if a = b .

This article aims to present the improvement of the second Fejér inequality for ( h , g ; m ) -convex and ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions. Likewise, we will show that these new results are generalizations of already known results related to various classes of convex functions, such as ( h m ) -convex, h -convex, m -convex, and nonnegative convex functions.

2 Main result

Here is improvement of the second Fejér inequality for ( h , g ; m ) -convex function obtained in [7].

Theorem 3

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.1) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x min f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -concave function, then the following inequality holds:

(2.2) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x max f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) . First, we have

f ( x ) = f b x b a a + m x a b a b m

and

f ( a + b x ) = f b x b a b + m x a b a a m .

From the fact that f is ( h , g ; m ) -convex function, we have

(2.3) f b x b a a + m x a b a b m h b x b a f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h x a b a f b m g b m

and

(2.4) f b x b a b + m x a b a a m h b x b a f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h x a b a f a m g a m .

Integrating on [ a , b ] , we have

(2.5) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x = a b f b x b a a + m x a b a b m w ( x ) d x a b h b x b a f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h x a b a f b m g b m w ( x ) d x = f ( a ) g ( a ) a b h b x b a w ( x ) d x + m f b m g b m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x

and

(2.6) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x = a b f b x b a b + m x a b a a m w ( x ) d x a b h b x b a f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h x a b a f a m g a m w ( x ) d x = f ( b ) g ( b ) a b h b x b a w ( x ) d x + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Since w is symmetric, it is easy to check that

a b h b x b a w ( x ) d x = a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Hence, we have

(2.7) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x

and

(2.8) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x ,

so the inequality (2.1) is proved.

Now, let us prove the inequality (2.2). For ( h , g ; m ) -concave function f , the following inequality holds:

(2.9) f ( λ x + m ( 1 λ ) y ) h ( λ ) f ( x ) g ( x ) + m h ( 1 λ ) f ( y ) g ( y ) , λ ( 0 , 1 ) .

Further, we use the substitutions:

(2.10) x = b x b a a + x a b a b

and

(2.11) a + b x = b x b a b + x a b a a

to express f ( x ) and f ( a + b x ) in forms suitable for applying the inequality (2.9). Hence, we obtain:

f ( x ) h b x b a f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h x a b a f b m g b m

and

f ( a + b x ) h b x b a f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h x a b a f a m g a m .

By integrating both inequalities over [ a , b ] and using the symmetry of w , we obtain:

a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x , a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Therefore, inequality (2.2) follows by taking the maximum of the two lower bounds.□

Remark 1

If we use (1.7), we obtain:

(2.12) min f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m 1 2 f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m + m f b m g b m ,

so the Theorem 3 is the improvement of the Theorem 2.

Corollary 1

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; m ) -concave function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.13) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We use inequality (1.8) with p = 1 to obtain

(2.14)□ max f ( a ) g ( a ) + m f b m g b m , f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m 1 2 f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) + m f a m g a m + m f b m g b m .

Now we shall give the special cases of the Theorem 3 by using special classes of convex functions.

Corollary 2

Let f be a nonnegative ( h m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 and m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.15) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x min f ( a ) + m f b m , f ( b ) + m f a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative ( h m ) -concave function, then the following inequality holds:

(2.16) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x max f ( a ) + m f b m , f ( b ) + m f a m a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We apply Theorem 3 for g ( x ) = 1 to obtain the result.□

Corollary 3

Let f be a nonnegative h -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 . Let 0 a < b < and f , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.17) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative h -concave, then the following inequality holds:

(2.18) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x ( f ( a ) + f ( b ) ) a b h x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We apply Theorem 3 for m = 1 and g = 1 to obtain the result.□

Corollary 4

Let f be a nonnegative m -convex function on [ 0 , ) , for m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.19) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 min f ( a ) + m f b m , f ( b ) + m f a m a b x a b a w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative m -concave function, then the following inequality holds:

(2.20) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 max f ( a ) + m f b m , f ( b ) + m f a m a b x a b a w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We apply Theorem 3 for h ( x ) = x and g = 1 to obtain the result.□

The following corollary is the second Fejér inequality for nonnegative convex and concave functions.

Corollary 5

Let f be a nonnegative convex function on [ 0 , ) . Let 0 a < b < and f L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(2.21) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 a b w ( x ) d x .

If f is nonnegative concave function on [ 0 , ) , then the following inequality holds:

(2.22) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 a b w ( x ) d x .

Proof

We apply Theorem 3 for m = 1 , h ( x ) = x and g = 1 to obtain the result.□

3 Further generalization to the ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions

In this section, we shall give the further generalization of the previous results to the class of the ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions (see [8], Definition 2.1. by setting c = 0 ).

Definition 4

Let h be a nonnegative function on J R , ( 0 , 1 ) J , h 0 and let g be a positive function on I R and α , m ( 0 , 1 ] . A function f : I R is said to be ( h , g ; α m ) -convex if it is nonnegative and satisfies the following inequality:

(3.1) f ( λ x + m ( 1 λ ) y ) h ( λ α ) f ( x ) g ( x ) + m h ( 1 λ α ) f ( y ) g ( y )

for all λ ( 0 , 1 ) and all x , y I .

If we rewrite the aforementioned definition in the following form:

(3.2) f ( x ) h b x b a α f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h 1 b x b a α f b m g b m

and

(3.3) f ( x ) h x a b a α f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h 1 x a b a α f a m g a m ,

then we have

(3.4) f ( x ) min h b x b a α f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h 1 b x b a α f b m g b m , h x a b a α f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h 1 x a b a α f a m g a m .

Theorem 4

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and α , m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(3.5) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x min f ( a ) g ( a ) I 1 + m f b m g b m I 2 , f ( b ) g ( b ) I 1 + m f a m g a m I 2 ,

where

I 1 = a b h b x b a α w ( x ) d x

and

I 2 = a b h 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

For a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function f, the inequality in (3.5) is reversed by using the maximum instead of the minimum.

Proof

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) . Then we have:

(3.6) f ( x ) min h b x b a α f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h 1 b x b a α f b m g b m , h x a b a α f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h 1 x a b a α f a m g a m .

Now, since w is symmetric with respect to a + b 2 , we have

(3.7) I 1 = a b h b x b a α w ( x ) d x = a b h x a b a α w ( x ) d x

and

(3.8) I 2 = a b h 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x = a b h 1 x a b a α w ( x ) d x ,

so by using (3.6), we obtain

(3.9) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x a b min h b x b a α f ( a ) g ( a ) + m h 1 b x b a α f b m g b m , h x a b a α f ( b ) g ( b ) + m h 1 x a b a α f a m g a m w ( x ) d x min f ( a ) g ( a ) I 1 + m f b m g b m I 2 , f ( b ) g ( b ) I 1 + m f a m g a m I 2 ,

which completes the proof of inequality (3.5).

Finally, if f is a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function, the inequality presented in (3.6) is reversed with the maximum substituting the minimum. Consequently, the inequality in (3.5) is also reversed with the maximum replacing the minimum.□

Remark 2

If we put α = 1 in Theorem 4, then ( h , g ; α m ) -convexity reduces to ( h , g ; m ) -convexity, so the inequality from Theorem 3 is obtained.

Corollary 6

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and α , m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Then the following inequality holds

(3.10) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) I 1 + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m I 2 .

where

I 1 = a b h b x b a α w ( x ) d x

and

I 2 = a b h 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

For a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function f , the inequality in (3.10) is reversed.

Proof

If f is nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex, we apply inequality (1.7) to the right-hand side of (3.5) to obtain

(3.11) min f ( a ) g ( a ) I 1 + m f b m g b m I 2 , f ( b ) g ( b ) I 1 + m f a m g a m I 2 1 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) I 1 + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m I 2 ,

which concludes the proof of inequality (3.10). On the other hand, if f is nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function, we use inequality (1.8) for p = 1 to obtain the assertion.□

Remark 3

If we put α = 1 in Corollary 6, then ( h , g ; α m ) -convexity reduces to ( h , g ; m ) -convexity, so the inequality from Theorem 2 is obtained.

In the following result, we consider additional assumptions for the function h .

Theorem 5

Let f be a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function on [ 0 , ) , where h is a nonnegative concave function on J R , h 0 , g is a positive function on [ 0 , ) and α , m ( 0 , 1 ] . Let 0 a < b < and f , g , h L 1 [ a , b ] . Furthermore, let w : [ a , b ] R be a nonnegative, integrable, and symmetric about a + b 2 . Let us denote W a b w ( x ) d x . Then the following inequality holds

(3.12) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x W 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) h 1 W a b b x b a α w ( x ) d x + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m h 1 W a b 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

If f is a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -concave function and h is a nonnegative convex function, the inequality in (3.12) is reversed.

Proof

First, let us assume that f is a nonnegative ( h , g ; α m ) -convex function and h is a nonnegative concave function. After applying the integral Jensen inequality, we have the following inequalities:

(3.13) I 1 = a b h b x b a α w ( x ) d x W h 1 W a b b x b a α w ( x ) d x

and

(3.14) I 2 = a b h 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x W h 1 W a b 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

Now, after applying (3.13) and (3.14) to the inequality (3.10), we obtain

(3.15) a b f ( x ) w ( x ) d x 1 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) I 1 + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m I 2 W 2 ( f ( a ) g ( a ) + f ( b ) g ( b ) ) h 1 W a b b x b a α w ( x ) d x + m f a m g a m + f b m g b m h 1 W a b 1 b x b a α w ( x ) d x .

Hence, the proof in this case is finished.

In the second case, we apply the Jensen’s integral inequality to the convex function h and derive the reversed forms of inequalities in (3.13) and (3.14). Analogously, we use those bounds to the reversed version of the inequality (3.10) to complete the proof.□

In this section, we have established new Fejér-type integral inequalities for the class of ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions, thereby providing a comprehensive generalization of existing results within the framework of generalized convexity.

4 Conclusion

In this study, the several new Fejér-type inequalities for ( h , g ; m ) -convex functions have been established. In addition, the application of the new inequalities on various types of convex types of functions are shown, such as ( h m ) -convex, h -convex, m -convex, and nonnegative convex functions. Further, some new Fejér type inequalities for ( h , g ; α m ) -convex functions have been obtained. Our results generalize and extend classical inequalities, offering broader applicability in the field of integral inequalities.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that significantly enhanced this work.

  1. Funding information: The authors state no external funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during this study.

References

[1] J. Barić, Lj. Kvesić, J. Pečarić, and M. Ribičić Penava, Fejér type inequalities for higher order convex functions and quadrature formulae, Aequationes Math. 96 (2022), no. 2, 417–430, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00010-021-00825-7. 10.1007/s00010-021-00825-7Suche in Google Scholar

[2] M. Jleli, Extension of Fejéras inequality to the class of sub-biharmonic functions, Open Math. 22 (2024), no. 1, 369–390, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2024-0035. 10.1515/math-2024-0035Suche in Google Scholar

[3] S. S. Dragomir, M. Jleli, and B. Samet, On Fejér-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic k-convex functions, Demonstr. Math. 57 (2024), no 1, 171–215, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dema-2024-0001. 10.1515/dema-2024-0001Suche in Google Scholar

[4] M. E. Ozdemir, A. O. Akdemir, and E. Set, On (h−m)-convexity and Hadamard type inequalities, Transylv. J. Math. Mech. 8 (2016), no. 1, 51–58. Suche in Google Scholar

[5] M. Andrić and J. Pečarić, On (h,g;m)-convexity and the Hermite-Hadamard inequality, J. Convex Anal. 29 (2022), no. 1, 257–268. Suche in Google Scholar

[6] M. Andrić, Féjer type inequalities for (h,g;m)-convex functions, TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math. 14 (2023), no. 2, 185–194, DOI: https://doi.org/10.30546/2219-1259.14.2.2023.185. 10.30546/2219-1259.14.2.2023.185Suche in Google Scholar

[7] M. Andrić, V. Culjak, D. Pečarić, J. Pečarić, and J. Perić, New Developments for Jensen and Lah-Ribarič Inequalities, Element, Zagreb, 2023. Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Y. Liu, G. Farid, J. Pečarić, J. Rod, M. Elamine, and S. Abdel-Khalek, Strongly (g,h;α−m)-convex functions and the consequent Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities, Appl. Math. Sci. Eng. 33 (2025), no. 1, 2471386, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/27690911.2025.2471386. 10.1080/27690911.2025.2471386Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2025-02-26
Revised: 2025-06-23
Accepted: 2025-06-30
Published Online: 2025-08-05

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Special Issue on Contemporary Developments in Graphs Defined on Algebraic Structures
  2. Forbidden subgraphs of TI-power graphs of finite groups
  3. Finite group with some c#-normal and S-quasinormally embedded subgroups
  4. Classifying cubic symmetric graphs of order 88p and 88p 2
  5. Simplicial complexes defined on groups
  6. Two-sided zero-divisor graphs of orientation-preserving and order-decreasing transformation semigroups
  7. Further results on permanents of Laplacian matrices of trees
  8. Special Issue on Convex Analysis and Applications - Part II
  9. A generalized fixed-point theorem for set-valued mappings in b-metric spaces
  10. Research Articles
  11. Dynamics of particulate emissions in the presence of autonomous vehicles
  12. The regularity of solutions to the Lp Gauss image problem
  13. Exploring homotopy with hyperspherical tracking to find complex roots with application to electrical circuits
  14. The ill-posedness of the (non-)periodic traveling wave solution for the deformed continuous Heisenberg spin equation
  15. Some results on value distribution concerning Hayman's alternative
  16. 𝕮-inverse of graphs and mixed graphs
  17. A note on the global existence and boundedness of an N-dimensional parabolic-elliptic predator-prey system with indirect pursuit-evasion interaction
  18. On a question of permutation groups acting on the power set
  19. Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind and the univariate Lommel function: Integral representations
  20. Blow-up of solutions for Euler-Bernoulli equation with nonlinear time delay
  21. Spectrum boundary domination of semiregularities in Banach algebras
  22. Statistical inference and data analysis of the record-based transmuted Burr X model
  23. A modified predictor–corrector scheme with graded mesh for numerical solutions of nonlinear Ψ-caputo fractional-order systems
  24. Dynamical properties of two-diffusion SIR epidemic model with Markovian switching
  25. Classes of modules closed under projective covers
  26. On the dimension of the algebraic sum of subspaces
  27. Periodic or homoclinic orbit bifurcated from a heteroclinic loop for high-dimensional systems
  28. On tangent bundles of Walker four-manifolds
  29. Regularity of weak solutions to the 3D stationary tropical climate model
  30. A new result for entire functions and their shifts with two shared values
  31. Freely quasiconformal and locally weakly quasisymmetric mappings in metric spaces
  32. On the spectral radius and energy of the degree distance matrix of a connected graph
  33. Solving the quartic by conics
  34. A topology related to implication and upsets on a bounded BCK-algebra
  35. On a subclass of multivalent functions defined by generalized multiplier transformation
  36. Local minimizers for the NLS equation with localized nonlinearity on noncompact metric graphs
  37. Approximate multi-Cauchy mappings on certain groupoids
  38. Multiple solutions for a class of fourth-order elliptic equations with critical growth
  39. A note on weighted measure-theoretic pressure
  40. Majorization-type inequalities for (m, M, ψ)-convex functions with applications
  41. Recurrence for probabilistic extension of Dowling polynomials
  42. Unraveling chaos: A topological analysis of simplicial homology groups and their foldings
  43. Global existence and blow-up of solutions to pseudo-parabolic equation for Baouendi-Grushin operator
  44. A characterization of the translational hull of a weakly type B semigroup with E-properties
  45. Some new bounds on resolvent energy of a graph
  46. Carmichael numbers composed of Piatetski-Shapiro primes in Beatty sequences
  47. The number of rational points of some classes of algebraic varieties over finite fields
  48. Singular direction of meromorphic functions with finite logarithmic order
  49. Pullback attractors for a class of second-order delay evolution equations with dispersive and dissipative terms on unbounded domain
  50. Eigenfunctions on an infinite Schrödinger network
  51. Boundedness of fractional sublinear operators on weighted grand Herz-Morrey spaces with variable exponents
  52. On SI2-convergence in T0-spaces
  53. Bubbles clustered inside for almost-critical problems
  54. Classification and irreducibility of a class of integer polynomials
  55. Existence and multiplicity of positive solutions for multiparameter periodic systems
  56. Averaging method in optimal control problems for integro-differential equations
  57. On superstability of derivations in Banach algebras
  58. Investigating the modified UO-iteration process in Banach spaces by a digraph
  59. The evaluation of a definite integral by the method of brackets illustrating its flexibility
  60. Existence of positive periodic solutions for evolution equations with delay in ordered Banach spaces
  61. Tilings, sub-tilings, and spectral sets on p-adic space
  62. The higher mapping cone axiom
  63. Continuity and essential norm of operators defined by infinite tridiagonal matrices in weighted Orlicz and l spaces
  64. A family of commuting contraction semigroups on l 1 ( N ) and l ( N )
  65. Pullback attractor of the 2D non-autonomous magneto-micropolar fluid equations
  66. Maximal function and generalized fractional integral operators on the weighted Orlicz-Lorentz-Morrey spaces
  67. On a nonlinear boundary value problems with impulse action
  68. Normalized ground-states for the Sobolev critical Kirchhoff equation with at least mass critical growth
  69. Decompositions of the extended Selberg class functions
  70. Subharmonic functions and associated measures in ℝn
  71. Some new Fejér type inequalities for (h, g; α - m)-convex functions
  72. The robust isolated calmness of spectral norm regularized convex matrix optimization problems
  73. Multiple positive solutions to a p-Kirchhoff equation with logarithmic terms and concave terms
  74. Joint approximation of analytic functions by the shifts of Hurwitz zeta-functions in short intervals
  75. Green's graphs of a semigroup
  76. Some new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for product of strongly h-convex functions on ellipsoids and balls
  77. Infinitely many solutions for a class of Kirchhoff-type equations
  78. On an uncertainty principle for small index subgroups of finite fields
Heruntergeladen am 5.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2025-0184/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen