Home Mathematics Commutator of fractional integral with Lipschitz functions related to Schrödinger operator on local generalized mixed Morrey spaces
Article Open Access

Commutator of fractional integral with Lipschitz functions related to Schrödinger operator on local generalized mixed Morrey spaces

  • Suleyman Celik EMAIL logo , Vagif S. Guliyev and Ali Akbulut
Published/Copyright: November 22, 2024

Abstract

Let L = + V be the Schrödinger operator on R n , where V 0 is a non-negative function satisfying the reverse Hölder class R H q 1 for some q 1 > n 2 . is the Laplacian on R n . Assume that b is a member of the Campanato space Λ ν θ ( ρ ) and that the fractional integral operator associated with L is β L . We study the boundedness of the commutators [ b , β L ] with b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) on local generalized mixed Morrey spaces. Generalized mixed Morrey spaces M p , φ α , V , vanishing generalized mixed Morrey spaces V M p , φ α , V , and L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } are related to the Schrödinger operator, in that order. We demonstrate that the commutator operator [ b , β L ] is satisfied when b belongs to Λ ν θ ( ρ ) with θ > 0 , 0 < ν < 1 , and ( φ 1 , φ 2 ) satisfying certain requirements are bounded from L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } to L M q , φ 2 α , V , { x 0 } ; from M p , φ 1 α , V to M q , φ 2 α , V , and from V M p , φ 1 α , V to V M q , φ 2 α , V , i = 1 n 1 p i i = 1 n 1 q i = β + ν .

MSC 2010: 42B35; 35J10; 47H50

1 Introduction and main results

This work studies the Schrödinger differential operator of second order in R n , where n 3 , as described by

L = Δ + V .

For some exponent q n 2 , the function V is non-negative, V 0 , and it belongs to a reverse Hölder class R H q . Assume that V is a nonnegative locally L q ( R n ) integrable function on R n , then we say that V belongs to R H q ( 1 < p ) if there exists a positive constant C such that the reverse Hölder inequality

1 B B V q ( x ) d x 1 q C B B V ( x ) d x

holds for every x R n , where B ( x , r ) denotes the ball centered at x with radius r . The nonnegative polynomial V R H , and specifically x R H , should be noted (see, e.g., [1,2]).

Let the potential V R H q with q n 2 , and the critical radius function ρ ( x ) be defined as

ρ ( x ) 1 m V ( x ) = sup r > 0 r : 1 r n 2 B ( x , r ) V ( y ) d y 1 , x R n .

Clearly, 0 < m V ( x ) < ß when V 0 , and m V ( x ) = 1 when V = 1 and m V ( x ) 1 + x with V ( x ) = x 2 .

For sufficient good function f , the heat diffusion semigroup e t L allows the negative powers L β 2 ( β > 0 ) associated with the Schrödinger operators L to be written as

β L f ( x ) = L β 2 f ( x ) = 0 e t L ( f ) ( x ) t β 2 1 d t , 0 < β < n .

Applying Lemma 3.3 in [3] for enough good function f holds that

β L f ( x ) = R n K β ( x , y ) f ( y ) d y , 0 < β < n .

The commutator of β L is defined by

[ b , β L ] f ( x ) = b ( x ) β L f ( x ) β L ( b f ) ( x ) .

Note that if L = is the Laplacian on R n , then β L and [ b , β L ] are the Riesz potential I β and the commutator of the Riesz potential [ b , I β ] , respectively, i.e.,

I β f ( x ) = R n f ( y ) x y n d y , [ b , I β ] f ( x ) = R n b ( x ) b ( y ) x y n f ( y ) d y .

Let θ > 0 and 0 < ν < 1 ; in view of [4], the Campanato class, associated with Schrödinger operator, Λ ν θ ( ρ ) consists of the locally integrable functions b such that

(1.1) 1 B ( x , r ) 1 + ν n B ( x , r ) b ( y ) b B d y C 1 + r ρ ( x ) θ ,

for all x R n and r > 0 . A seminorm of b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) , denoted by [ b ] ν θ , is given by the infimum of the constants in the aforementioned inequality.

Note that if θ = 0 , Λ ν θ ( ρ ) is the classical Campanato space; if ν = 0 , Λ ν θ ( ρ ) is exactly the space BMO θ ( ρ ) introduced in [1].

Throughout this article, the letter p denotes n-tuples of the numbers in ( 0 , ] , n 1 , p = ( p 1 , p 2 , , p n ) , 1 p < means 1 p i < for each i . For 1 p , we denote p = ( p 1 , , p n ) , where p i satisfies 1 p i + 1 p i = 1 .

In 2019, Nogayama [5] considered a new Morrey space, with the L p norm replaced by the mixed Lebesgue norm L p ( R n ) , which is called mixed Morrey spaces.

We first recall the definition of mixed Lebesgue space defined in [6].

Let p = ( p 1 , , p n ) ( 0 , ] n . Then, the mixed Lebesgue norm L p or L ( p 1 , , p n ) is defined by

f L p f L ( p 1 , , p n ) = R R R f ( x 1 , x 2 , , x n ) p 1 d x 1 p 2 p 1 d x 2 p 3 p 2 d x n 1 p n ,

where f : R n R is a measurable function. If p j = for some j = 1 , , n , then we have to make appropriate modifications. We define the mixed Lebesgue space L p ( R n ) = L ( p 1 , , p n ) ( R n ) to be the set of all f L 0 ( R n ) with f L p < , where L 0 ( R n ) denotes the set of measureable functions on R n .

The following analog of Hölder’s inequality for L p is well known (see, e.g., [7]).

Theorem 1.1

Let Ω R n be a measurable set, 1 p and 1 p + 1 p = 1 . Then, for any f L p ( Ω ) , and g L p ( Ω ) , the following inequality is valid:

Ω f ( x ) g ( x ) d x f L p ( Ω ) g L p ( Ω ) .

By elementary calculations, we have the following property.

Lemma 1.1

Let 0 < p < and B be a ball in R n . Then,

χ B L p = χ B W L p = B 1 n i = 1 n 1 p i .

By Theorem 1.1 and Lemma 1.1, we obtain the following estimate.

Lemma 1.2

For 1 p < and for the balls B = B ( x , r ) , the following inequality is valid:

B f ( y ) d y B 1 n i = 1 n 1 p f L p ( B ) .

The following lemma shows the Lebesgue differential theorem in mixed-norm Lebesgue spaces as follows.

Lemma 1.3

[7, Lemma 2.4] Let f L 1 loc ( R n ) and 0 < p < , then

lim r 0 χ B ( x , r ) L p 1 f L p ( B ( x , r ) ) = f ( x ) , a.e. x R n .

Morrey [8] proposed the traditional Morrey spaces L p , λ to examine the local behavior of solutions to elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs). Actually, a higher degree of regularity in the solutions to certain elliptic and parabolic boundary problems may be obtained thanks to the improved inclusion between the Morrey and the Hölder spaces. Generalized Morrey spaces M p , φ were separately introduced by Guliyev et al. [911] (see also [1214]). Generally speaking, local Morrey spaces were also introduced separately by Guliyev [9] and Garcia-Cuerva and Herrero [15] (see also [16]). It should be noted that Guliyev introduced and analyzed integral operators in local Morrey-type spaces, including generalized local Morrey spaces, in [9].

We now present the definition of local generalized mixed Morrey space L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } and generalized mixed Morrey spaces M p , φ α , V ( R n ) associated with Schrödinger operator, which in the case of p = ( p , , p ) introduced by Guliyev [17].

For brevity, in the sequel, we use the notations

A p , φ α , V ( f ; x , r ) 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ ( x , r ) 1 χ B ( x , r ) L p ( R n ) 1 f χ B ( x , r ) L p ( R n ) .

Definition 1.1

Let φ ( x , r ) be a positive measurable function on R n × ( 0 , ) , 1 p < , α 0 , and V R H q , q 1 . For any fixed x 0 R n , we denote by L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } = L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } ( R n ) , M p , φ α , V = M p , φ α , V ( R n ) the local generalized mixed Morrey space, and the generalized mixed Morrey space associated with Schrödinger operator, and the space of all functions f L p loc ( R n ) with finite norms:

f L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } = sup r > 0 A p , φ α , V ( f ; x 0 , r ) ,

f M p , φ α , V = sup x R n , r > 0 A p , φ α , V ( f ; x , r ) ,

respectively.

Remark 1.1

  1. When α = 0 , and φ ( x 0 , r ) = r ( λ n 1 ) i = 1 n 1 p i , L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } ( R n ) is the local (central) mixed Morrey space L M p , λ { x 0 } ( R n ) studied in [9,16,18] in the case of p = ( p , , p ) ;

  2. When V 0 ( α = 0 ), L M p , φ 0 , 0 , { x 0 } ( R n ) is the local generalized mixed Morrey space, and L M p , φ { x 0 } ( R n ) was introduced by Guliyev [9] in the case of p = ( p , , p ) (see also [1922]).

Definition 1.2

The vanishing generalized Morrey space associated with Schrödinger operator V M p , φ α , V ( R n ) is defined as the spaces of functions f M p , φ α , V ( R n ) such that

(1.2) lim r 0 sup x R n A p , φ α , V ( f ; x , r ) = 0 .

The vanishing space V M p , φ α , V ( R n ) is Banach space with respect to the norm

f V M p , φ α , V f M p , φ α , V = sup x R n , r > 0 A p , φ α , V ( f ; x , r ) .

In the case of α = 0 , p = ( p , , p ) , and φ ( x , r ) = r ( λ n ) p , V M p , φ α , V ( R n ) is the vanishing Morrey space V M p , λ introduced in [23], where applications to PDE were considered.

We refer to [2427] for some properties of vanishing generalized Morrey spaces.

When b BMO , Chanillo proved in [28] that [ b , I β ] is bounded from L p ( R n ) to L q ( R n ) with 1 q = 1 p β n , 1 < p < n β . When b belongs to the Campanato space Λ ν , 0 < ν < 1 , Paluszyński [29] showed that [ b , I β ] is bounded from L p ( R n ) to L q ( R n ) with 1 q = 1 p ( β + ν ) n , 1 < p < n ( β + ν ) . When b BMO θ ( ρ ) , Bui [30] obtained the boundedness of [ b , β L ] from L p ( R n ) to L q ( R n ) with 1 q = 1 p β n , 1 < p < n β .

Inspired by the aforementioned results, we are interested in the boundedness of [ b , β L ] generalized mixed Morrey spaces M p , φ α , V ( R n ) and the vanishing generalized mixed Morrey spaces V M p , φ α , V ( R n ) , when b belongs to the new Campanato class Λ ν θ ( ρ ) .

In this article, we consider the boundedness of the commutator of β L on the local generalized mixed Morrey spaces L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } , the generalized mixed Morrey spaces M p , φ α , V ( R n ) , and the vanishing generalized mixed Morrey spaces V M p , φ α , V ( R n ) . When b belongs to the new Campanato space Λ ν θ ( ρ ) , 0 < ν < 1 , we show that [ b , β L ] are bounded from L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } to L M q , φ 2 α , V , { x 0 } , from M p , φ α , V ( R n ) to M q , φ α , V ( R n ) , and from V M p , φ α , V ( R n ) to V M q , φ α , V ( R n ) with i = 1 n 1 p i i = 1 n 1 q i = β + ν , 1 < p < n ( β + ν ) .

Our main results are the following.

Theorem 1.2

Let x 0 R n , b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) , V R H q 1 , q 1 > n 2 , 0 < ν < 1 , α 0 , 1 < p < n ( β + ν ) , i = 1 n 1 p i i = 1 n 1 q i = β + ν , and φ 1 , φ 2 Ω p , loc α , V satisfy the condition

(1.3) r ess inf t < s < φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t c 0 φ 2 ( x 0 , r ) ,

where c 0 does not depend on x 0 and r , and for the definition of Ω p , loc α , V , see Remark 2.1. Then, the operator [ b , β L ] is bounded from M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } to M q , φ 2 α , V , { x 0 } . Moreover,

[ b , β L ] f M q , φ 2 α , V , { x 0 } C [ b ] ν θ f M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } ,

where C does not depend on f.

Corollary 1.1

Let b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) , V R H q 1 , q 1 > n 2 , 0 < ν < 1 , α 0 , 1 < p < n ( β + ν ) , i = 1 n 1 p i i = 1 n 1 q i = β + ν , and φ 1 Ω p α , V , φ 2 Ω q α , V satisfy the condition

(1.4) r ess inf t < s < φ 1 ( x , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t c 0 φ 2 ( x , r ) ,

where c 0 does not depend on x and r, and for the definition of Ω p α , V , see Remark 2.2. Then, the operator [ b , β L ] is bounded from M p , φ 1 α , V to M q , φ 2 α , V . Moreover,

[ b , β L ] f M q , φ 2 α , V C [ b ] θ f M p , φ 1 α , V ,

where C does not depend on f.

Theorem 1.3

Let b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) , V R H q 1 , q 1 > n 2 , 0 < ν < 1 , α 0 , b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) , 1 < p < n ( β + ν ) , i = 1 n 1 p i i = 1 n 1 q i = β + ν , and φ 1 Ω p , 1 α , V , φ 2 Ω q , 1 α , V satisfy the conditions

c δ δ sup x R n φ 1 ( x , t ) d t t < ,

for every δ > 0 , and

(1.5) r φ 1 ( x , t ) t 1 β ν d t C 0 φ 2 ( x , r ) ,

where C 0 does not depend on x R n , r > 0 and for the definition of Ω p , 1 α , V , see Remark 2.3. Then, the operator [ b , β L ] is bounded from V M p , φ 1 α , V to V M q , φ 2 α , V for p > 1 .

Remark 1.2

Note that in the case of p = ( p , , p ) , V 0 , ν = 0 Corollary 1.1 and Theorem 1.3 were proved in [31, Corollary 5.5 and 7.5] and in the case of p = ( p , , p ) , φ ( x , r ) = r ( λ n ) p , ν = 0 in [32, Theorems 1.3 and 1.4].

In this article, we shall use the symbol A B to indicate that there exists a universal positive constant C , independent of all important parameters, such that A C B . A B means that A B and B A .

2 Some technical lemmas and propositions

We would like to recall the important properties concerning the critical function.

Lemma 2.1

[2] Suppose V R H q 1 with q 1 > n 2 . Then, there exist C and k 0 1 such that

(2.1) C 1 ρ ( x ) 1 + x y ρ ( x ) k 0 ρ ( y ) C ρ ( x ) 1 + x y ρ ( x ) k 0 1 + k 0 ,

for all x , y R n .

Lemma 2.2

[33] Suppose x B ( x 0 , r ) . Then, for k N , we have

1 1 + 2 k r ρ ( x ) N 1 1 + 2 k r ρ ( x 0 ) N ( k 0 + 1 ) .

According to [1], the new BMO space BMO θ ( ρ ) with θ 0 is defined as a set of all locally integrable functions b such that

1 B ( x , r ) B ( x , r ) b ( y ) b B d y C 1 + r ρ ( x ) θ ,

for all x R n and r > 0 , where b B = 1 B B b ( y ) d y and BMO ≡ BMO θ (ρ). A norm for b BMO θ ( ρ ) , denoted by [ b ] θ , is given by the infimum of the constants in the aforementioned inequalities. Clearly, B M O BMO θ ( ρ ) .

Let θ > 0 and 0 < ν < 1 ; a seminorm on Campanato class Λ ν θ ( ρ ) is denoted by [ b ] ν θ

(2.2) [ b ] ν θ sup x R n , r > 0 1 B ( x , r ) 1 + ν n B ( x , r ) b ( y ) b B d y 1 + r ρ ( x ) θ < .

The Lipschitz space, associated with Schrödinger operator (see [4]), consists of the functions f satisfying

f Lip ν θ ( ρ ) sup x R n , r > 0 f ( x ) f ( y ) x y ν 1 + x y ρ ( x ) + x y ρ ( y ) θ < .

It is easy to see that this space is exactly the Lipschitz space when θ = 0 .

Note that if θ = 0 in (2.2), Λ ν θ ( ρ ) is exactly the classical Campanato space; if ν = 0 , Λ ν θ ( ρ ) is exactly the space BMO θ ( ρ ) ; if θ = 0 and ν = 0 , it is exactly the John-Nirenberg space BMO .

The following relation between Lip ν θ ( ρ ) and Λ ν θ ( ρ ) was proved in [4, Theorem 5].

Lemma 2.3

[4] Let θ > 0 and 0 < ν < 1 . Then, the following embedding is valid:

Λ ν θ ( ρ ) Lip ν θ ( ρ ) Λ ν ( k 0 + 1 ) θ ( ρ ) ,

where k 0 is the constant appearing in Lemma 2.1.

We list some properties involving Campanato space, associated with Schrödinger operator Λ ν θ ( ρ ) .

Lemma 2.4

[4] Let θ > 0 and 1 s < . If b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) , then there exists a positive constant C such that

1 B B b ( y ) b B s d y 1 s C [ b ] ν θ r ν 1 + r ρ ( x ) θ ,

for all B = B ( x , r ) , with x R n and r > 0 , where θ = ( k 0 + 1 ) θ and k 0 is the constant appearing in (2.1).

Let K β be the kernel of β L . The following result gives the estimate on the kernel K β ( x , y ) .

Lemma 2.5

[30] If V R H q 1 with q 1 > n 2 , then for every N, there exists a constant C such that

(2.3) K β ( x , y ) C 1 + x y ρ ( x ) N 1 x y n β , 0 < β < n .

Finally, we recall a relationship between essential supremum and essential infimum.

Lemma 2.6

[34] Let f be a real-valued nonnegative function and measurable on E. Then,

( ess inf x E f ( x ) ) 1 = ess sup x E 1 f ( x ) .

It is natural, first of all, to find conditions ensuring that the spaces L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } and M p , φ α , V are nontrivial, which consist not only of functions equivalent to 0 on R n .

Lemma 2.7

Let x 0 R n , φ ( x , r ) be a positive measurable function on R n × ( 0 , ) , 1 p < , α 0 , and V R H q , q 1 . If

(2.4) sup t < r < 1 + r ρ ( x 0 ) α r i = 1 n 1 p i φ ( x 0 , r ) = , f o r s o m e t > 0 ,

then L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } ( R n ) = Θ , where Θ is the set of all functions equivalent to 0 on R n .

Proof

Let (2.4) be satisfied and f be not equivalent to zero. Then, f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) > 0 ; hence,

f L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } sup t < r < 1 + r ρ ( x 0 ) α φ ( x 0 , r ) 1 r i = 1 n 1 p i f L p ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) sup t < r < 1 + r ρ ( x 0 ) α φ ( x 0 , r ) 1 r i = 1 n 1 p i .

Therefore, f L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } = .□

Remark 2.1

We denote by Ω p , loc α , V the sets of all positive measurable functions φ on R n × ( 0 , ) such that for all t > 0 ,

sup x R n 1 + r ρ ( x ) α r i = 1 n 1 p i φ ( x , r ) L ( t , ) < .

In what follows, keeping in mind Lemma 2.7, for the non-triviality of the space L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } ( R n ) , we always assume that φ Ω p , loc α , V .

Lemma 2.8

[33] Let φ ( x , r ) be a positive measurable function on R n × ( 0 , ) , 1 p < , α 0 , and V R H q , q 1 .

  1. If

    (2.5) sup t < r < 1 + r ρ ( x ) α r i = 1 n 1 p i φ ( x , r ) = , f o r s o m e t > 0 a n d f o r a l l x R n ,

    then M p , φ α , V ( R n ) = Θ .

  2. If

    (2.6) sup 0 < r < τ 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ ( x , r ) 1 = , for s o m e τ > 0 and f o r a l l x R n ,

    then M p , φ α , V ( R n ) = Θ .

Remark 2.2

We denote by Ω p α , V the sets of all positive measurable functions φ on R n × ( 0 , ) such that for all t > 0 ,

sup x R n 1 + r ρ ( x ) α r i = 1 n 1 p i φ ( x , r ) L ( t , ) < , and sup x R n 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ ( x , r ) 1 L ( 0 , t ) < ,

respectively. In what follows, keeping in mind Lemma 2.8, for the non-triviality of the space M p , φ α , V ( R n ) , we always assume that φ Ω p α , V .

Remark 2.3

We denote by Ω p , 1 α , V the sets of all positive measurable functions φ on R n × ( 0 , ) such that

(2.7) inf x R n inf r > δ 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ ( x , r ) > 0 , for some δ > 0 ,

and

lim r 0 1 + r ρ ( x ) α r i = 1 n 1 p i φ ( x , r ) = 0 .

For the non-triviality of the space V M p , φ α , V ( R n ) , we always assume that φ Ω p , 1 α , V .

3 Proof of Theorem 1.2

We state some properties, see, for example, [25].

Lemma 3.1

[25] Let 0 < ν < 1 , 0 < β + ν < n , and b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) ; then, the following pointwise estimate holds:

[ b , β L ] f ( x ) [ b ] ν θ I β + ν ( f ) ( x ) .

From Lemma 3.1, we obtain the following.

Corollary 3.1

Suppose V R H q 1 with q 1 > n 2 and b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) with 0 < ν < 1 . Let 0 < β + ν < n , and let 1 < p < q < satisfy i = 1 n 1 p i i = 1 n 1 q i = β + ν . Then, for all f in L p ( R n ) , we have

[ b , β L ] f L q ( R n ) f L p ( R n ) .

In order to prove Theorem 1.2, we need the following.

Theorem 3.1

Suppose V R H q 1 with q 1 > n 2 , b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) , θ > 0 , 0 < ν < 1 . Let 0 < β + ν < n and let 1 < p < q < satisfy i = 1 n 1 p i i = 1 n 1 q i = β + ν , then, the inequality

[ b , β L ] f L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) I β + ν ( f ) L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) r i = 1 n 1 q i 2 r f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t

holds for any f L p loc ( R n ) .

Proof

For arbitrary x 0 R n , set B = B ( x 0 , r ) and λ B = B ( x 0 , λ r ) for any λ > 0 . We write f as f = f 1 + f 2 , where f 1 ( y ) = f ( y ) χ B ( x 0 , 2 r ) ( y ) , and χ B ( x 0 , 2 r ) denotes the characteristic function of B ( x 0 , 2 r ) . Then,

[ b , β L ] f L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) I β + ν ( f ) L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) I β + ν f 1 L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) + I β + ν f 2 L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) .

Since f 1 L p ( R n ) and from the boundedness of I β + ν from L p ( R n ) to L q ( R n ) (see [35]), it follows that

(3.1) I β + ν f 1 L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) f L p ( B ( x 0 , 2 r ) ) r i = 1 n 1 q i f L p ( B ( x 0 , 2 r ) ) 2 r d t t i = 1 n 1 q i + 1 r i = 1 n 1 q i 2 r f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t .

To estimate I β + ν f 2 L p ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) , observe that x B , y ( 2 B ) c implies x y x 0 y . Then, by (2.3), we have

sup x B I β + ν f 2 ( x ) ( 2 B ) c f ( y ) x 0 y n β ν d y k = 1 ( 2 k + 1 r ) n + β 2 k + 1 B f ( y ) d y .

By Hölder’s inequality, we obtain

(3.2) sup x B I β + ν f 2 ( x ) k = 1 f L p ( 2 k + 1 B ) ( 2 k + 1 r ) 1 i = 1 n 1 p i + β 2 k r 2 k + 1 r d t k = 1 2 k r 2 k + 1 r f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t 2 r f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t .

Then,

(3.3) I β + ν f 2 L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) r i = 1 n 1 q i 2 r f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t

holds for 1 < p < n β . Therefore, by (3.1) and (3.3), we obtain

(3.4) I β + ν ( f ) L q ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) r i = 1 n 1 q i 2 r f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t

holds for 1 < p < n β .□

Proof of Theorem 1.2

From Lemma 2.6, we have

1 ess inf t < s < φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i = ess sup t < s < 1 φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i .

Note the fact that f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) is a nondecreasing function of t , and f L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } , then

1 + t ρ ( x 0 ) α f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) ess inf t < s < φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i ess sup t < s < 1 + t ρ ( x 0 ) α f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i sup 0 < s < 1 + s ρ ( x 0 ) α f L p ( B ( x 0 , s ) ) φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i f L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } .

Since α 0 , and ( φ 1 , φ 2 ) satisfy condition (1.3),

(3.5) 2 r f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t = 2 r 1 + t ρ ( x 0 ) α f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) ess inf t < s < φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i ess inf t < s < φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i 1 + t ρ ( x 0 ) α t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t f L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } 2 r ess inf t < s < φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i 1 + t ρ ( x 0 ) α t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t f L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } 1 + r ρ ( x 0 ) α r ess inf t < s < φ 1 ( x 0 , s ) s i = 1 n 1 p i t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t f L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } 1 + r ρ ( x 0 ) α φ 2 ( x 0 , r ) .

Then, by Theorem 3.1, we obtain

[ b , β L ] f L M q , φ 2 α , V , { x 0 } I β + ν ( f ) L M q , φ 2 α , V , { x 0 } sup x 0 R n , r > 0 1 + r ρ ( x 0 ) α φ 2 ( x 0 , r ) 1 r n q I β + ν ( f ) L p ( B ( x 0 , r ) ) sup x 0 R n , r > 0 1 + r ρ ( x 0 ) α φ 2 ( x 0 , r ) 1 2 r f L p ( B ( x 0 , t ) ) t i = 1 n 1 q i d t t f L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } .

4 Proof of Theorem 1.3

The statement is derived from estimate (3.4). The estimation of the norm of the operator, i.e., the boundedness in the non-vanishing space, immediately follows from by Theorem 1.2. So we only have to prove that

(4.1) lim r 0 sup x R n A p , φ 1 α , V ( f ; x , r ) = 0 lim r 0 sup x R n A q , φ 2 α , V ( [ b , β L ] f ; x , r ) = 0 .

To show that sup x R n 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ 2 ( x , r ) 1 r i = 1 n 1 p i [ b , β L ] f L q ( B ( x , r ) ) < ε for small r , we split the right-hand side of (3.4):

(4.2) 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ 2 ( x , r ) 1 r i = 1 n 1 p i [ b , β L ] f L q ( B ( x , r ) ) C [ I δ 0 ( x , r ) + J δ 0 ( x , r ) ] ,

where δ 0 > 0 (we may take δ 0 > 1 ), and

I δ 0 ( x , r ) 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ 2 ( x , r ) r δ 0 t i = 1 n 1 q i 1 f L p ( B ( x , t ) ) d t

and

J δ 0 ( x , r ) 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ 2 ( x , r ) δ 0 t i = 1 n 1 q i 1 f L p ( B ( x , t ) ) d t ,

and it is supposed that r < δ 0 . We use the fact that f V M p , φ 1 α , V ( R n ) and choose any fixed δ 0 > 0 such that

sup x R n 1 + t ρ ( x ) α φ 1 ( x , t ) 1 t i = 1 n 1 p i f L p ( B ( x , t ) ) < ε 2 C C 0 ,

where C and C 0 are the constants from (1.5) and (4.2). This allows us to estimate the first term uniformly in r ( 0 , δ 0 ) :

sup x R n C I δ 0 ( x , r ) < ε 2 , 0 < r < δ 0 .

The estimation of the second term now may be made already by the choice of r sufficiently small. Indeed, thanks to condition (2.7), we have

J δ 0 ( x , r ) c σ 0 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ 1 ( x , r ) f V M p , φ 1 α , V ,

where c σ 0 is the constant from (1.2). Then, by (2.7), it suffices to choose r small enough such that

sup x R n 1 + r ρ ( x ) α φ 2 ( x , r ) ε 2 c σ 0 f V M p , φ 1 α , V ,

which completes the proof of (4.1).

5 Conclusions

In this article, we study the boundedness of the fractional integral operator β L associated with Schrödinger operator and its commutators [ b , β L ] with b Λ ν θ ( ρ ) on local generalized mixed Morrey spaces L M p , φ α , V , { x 0 } associated with Schrödinger operator, generalized mixed Morrey spaces M p , φ α , V associated with Schrödinger operator, and vanishing generalized mixed Morrey spaces V M p , φ α , V associated with Schrödinger operator. We find the sufficient conditions on the pair ( φ 1 , φ 2 ) , which ensures the boundedness of the operator β L from L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } to L M q , φ 2 α , V , { x 0 } , from M p , φ 1 α , V to M q , φ 2 α , V , and from V M p , φ 1 α , V to V M q , φ 2 α , V , i = 1 n 1 q i = i = 1 n 1 p i β . When b belongs to BMO θ ( ρ ) and ( φ 1 , φ 2 ) satisfies some conditions, we also show that the commutator operator [ b , β L ] is bounded from L M p , φ 1 α , V , { x 0 } to L M q , φ 2 α , V , { x 0 } , from M p , φ 1 α , V to M q , φ 2 α , V , and from V M p , φ 1 α , V to V M q , φ 2 α , V , i = 1 n 1 q i = i = 1 n 1 p i β .

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the referees for careful reading of the manuscript and useful comments. The research of V. Guliyev was supported by the RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program.

  1. Funding information: No external funding was received for this work.

  2. Author contributions: The three authors worked together to complete this project. These intriguing issues were brought up by VSG in the study. The essay was written, the findings analyzed, and the theorems proven by VSG, AA, and SC. VSG, AA, and SC oversaw the study’s analysis. The final draft was read and approved by all three writers.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interests.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] B. Bongioanni, E. Harboure, and O. Salinas, Commutators of Riesz transforms related to Schödinger operators, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 17 (2011), no. 1, 115–134. 10.1007/s00041-010-9133-6Search in Google Scholar

[2] Z. Shen, Lp estimates for Schrödinger operators with certain potentials, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 45 (1995), no. 2, 513–546. 10.5802/aif.1463Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Tang and J. Dong, Weighted norm inequalities for Schrödinger type operators, Forum Math. 27 (2015), 2491–2532. 10.1515/forum-2013-0070Search in Google Scholar

[4] Y. Liu and J. Sheng, Some estimates for commutators of Riesz transforms associated with Schrödinger operators, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 419 (2014), 298–328. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.04.053Search in Google Scholar

[5] T. Nogayama, Mixed Morrey spaces, Positivity 23 (2019), no. 4, 961–1000. 10.1007/s11117-019-00646-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Benedek and R. Panzone, The space Lp, with mixed norm, Duke Math. J. 28 (1961), 301–324. 10.1215/S0012-7094-61-02828-9Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. Zhang and J. Zhou, The boundedness of fractional integral operators in local and global mixed Morrey-type spaces, Positivity 26 (2022), no. 26, 22. 10.1007/s11117-022-00886-1Search in Google Scholar

[8] C. Morrey, On the solutions of quasi-linear elliptic partial differential equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 (1938), 126–166. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1938-1501936-8Search in Google Scholar

[9] V. S. Guliyev, Integral Operators on Function Spaces on the Homogeneous Groups and on Domains in Rn, Ph.D. Dissertation (in Russian), Mat. Inst. Steklov, Moscow, 1994. Search in Google Scholar

[10] T. Mizuhara, Boundedness of some classical operators on generalized Morrey spaces, in: S. Igari (Ed.), Harmonic Analysis, ICM 90 Satellite Proceedings, Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 1991, pp. 183–189. 10.1007/978-4-431-68168-7_16Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. Nakai, Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator, singular integral operators and the Riesz potentials on generalized Morrey spaces, Math. Nachr. 166 (1994), 95–103. 10.1002/mana.19941660108Search in Google Scholar

[12] A. Akbulut, T. S. Gadjiev, A. Serbetci, and Y. I. Rustamov, Regularity of solutions to nonlinear elliptic equations in generalized Morrey spaces, Trans. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. Ser. Phys.-Tech. Math. Sci. 43 (2023), no. 4, 14–31. Search in Google Scholar

[13] V. S. Guliyev, Boundedness of the maximal, potential and singular operators in the generalized Morrey spaces, J. Inequal. Appl. 2009 (2009), 503948. 10.1155/2009/503948Search in Google Scholar

[14] Y. Sawano, A thought on generalized Morrey spaces, J. Indones. Math. Soc. 25 (2019), no. 3, 210–281. 10.22342/jims.25.3.819.210-281Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. Garcia-Cuerva and M. J. L. Herrero, A theory of Hardy spaces associated to Herz spaces, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 69 (1994), no. 3, 605–628. 10.1112/plms/s3-69.3.605Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Alvarez, J. Lakey, and M. Guzman-Partida, Spaces of bounded λ-central mean oscillation, Morrey spaces, and λ-central Carleson measures, Collect. Math. 51 (2000), no. 1, 1–47. Search in Google Scholar

[17] V. S. Guliyev, Function spaces and integral operators associated with Schrödinger operators: an overview, Proc. Inst. Math. Mech. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. 40 (2014), 178–202. Search in Google Scholar

[18] V. S. Guliyev, Generalized local Morrey spaces and fractional integral operators with rough kernel, J. Math. Sci. (N. Y.) 193 (2013), no. 2, 211–227. Search in Google Scholar

[19] V. S. Guliyev, Function spaces, Integral Operators and Two Weighted Inequalities on Homogeneous Groups, Some Applications, Casioglu, Baku, 1999. Search in Google Scholar

[20] V. S. Guliyev, Local generalized Morrey spaces and singular integrals with rough kernel, Azerb. J. Math. 3 (2013), no. 2, 79–94. 10.1007/s10958-013-1448-9Search in Google Scholar

[21] V. S. Guliyev, M. N. Omarova, M. A. Ragusa, and A. Scapellato, Commutators and generalized local Morrey spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 457 (2018), no. 2, 1388–1402. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.09.070Search in Google Scholar

[22] V. S. Guliyev, F. A. Isayev, and A. Serbetci, Multilinear Calderon-Zygmund operators with kernels of Dinias type and their commutators on generalized local Morrey spaces, Trans. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. Ser. Phys.-Tech. Math. Sci. 42 (2022), no. 4, 46–64. Search in Google Scholar

[23] C. Vitanza, Functions with vanishing Morrey norm and elliptic partial differential equations, in: Proceedings of methods of real analysis and partial differential equations, Springer, Capri, 1990, pp. 147–150. Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. Akbulut, S. Celik, and M. N. Omarova, Fractional maximal operator associated with Schrödinger operator and its commutators on vanishing generalized Morrey spaces, Trans. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. Ser. Phys.-Tech. Math. Sci. 44 (2024), no. 1, 3–19. Search in Google Scholar

[25] A. Akbulut, R. V. Guliyev, S. Celik, and M. N. Omarova, Fractional integral associated with Schrödinger operator on vanishing generalized Morrey spaces, J. Math. Inequal. 12 (2018), no. 3, 789–805. 10.7153/jmi-2018-12-60Search in Google Scholar

[26] M. A. Ragusa, Commutators of fractional integral operators on vanishing-Morrey spaces, J. Global Optim. 40 (2008), 1–3, 361–368. 10.1007/s10898-007-9176-7Search in Google Scholar

[27] N. Samko, Maximal, potential and singular operators in vanishing generalized Morrey spaces, J. Global Optim. 57 (2013), no. 4, 1385–1399. 10.1007/s10898-012-9997-xSearch in Google Scholar

[28] S. Chanillo, A note on commutators, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 31 (1982), no. 1, 7–16. 10.1512/iumj.1982.31.31002Search in Google Scholar

[29] M. Paluszyński, Characterization of the Besov spaces via the commutator operator of Coifman, Rochberg and Weiss, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 44 (1995), no. 1, 1–17. 10.1512/iumj.1995.44.1976Search in Google Scholar

[30] T. Bui, Weighted estimates for commutators of some singular integrals related to Schrödinger operator, Bull. Sci. Math. 138 (2014), no. 2, 270–292. 10.1016/j.bulsci.2013.06.007Search in Google Scholar

[31] V. S. Guliyev, S. S. Aliyev, T. Karaman, and P. Shukurov, Boundedness of sublinear operators and commutators on generalized Morrey spaces, Integral Equations Operator Theory 71 (2011), no. 3, 327–355. 10.1007/s00020-011-1904-1Search in Google Scholar

[32] L. Tang and J. Dong, Boundedness for some Schrödinger type operator on Morrey spaces related to certain nonnegative potentials, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 355 (2009), 101–109. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.01.043Search in Google Scholar

[33] A. Akbulut, V. S. Guliyev, and M. N. Omarova, Marcinkiewicz integrals associated with Schrödinger operators and their commutators on vanishing generalized Morrey spaces, Bound. Value Probl. 2017 (2017), 121. 10.1186/s13661-017-0851-4Search in Google Scholar

[34] R. Wheeden and A. Zygmund, Measure and integral: An introduction to real analysis, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 43. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York-Basel, 1977. 10.1201/b15702Search in Google Scholar

[35] E. M. Stein, Harmonic Analysis: Real-variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993. 10.1515/9781400883929Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-05-08
Revised: 2024-09-18
Accepted: 2024-10-01
Published Online: 2024-11-22

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Issue on Contemporary Developments in Graph Topological Indices
  2. On the maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of graphs
  3. Upper bounds for the global cyclicity index
  4. Zagreb connection indices on polyomino chains and random polyomino chains
  5. On the multiplicative sum Zagreb index of molecular graphs
  6. The minimum matching energy of unicyclic graphs with fixed number of vertices of degree two
  7. Special Issue on Convex Analysis and Applications - Part I
  8. Weighted Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities without any symmetry condition on the weight function
  9. Scattering threshold for the focusing energy-critical generalized Hartree equation
  10. (pq)-Compactness in spaces of holomorphic mappings
  11. Characterizations of minimal elements of upper support with applications in minimizing DC functions
  12. Some new Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for strongly h-convex functions on co-ordinates
  13. Global existence and extinction for a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void
  14. Extension of Fejér's inequality to the class of sub-biharmonic functions
  15. On sup- and inf-attaining functionals
  16. Regularization method and a posteriori error estimates for the two membranes problem
  17. Rapid Communication
  18. Note on quasivarieties generated by finite pointed abelian groups
  19. Review Articles
  20. Amitsur's theorem, semicentral idempotents, and additively idempotent semirings
  21. A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs
  22. On an Oberbeck-Boussinesq model relating to the motion of a viscous fluid subject to heating
  23. Pullback and uniform exponential attractors for non-autonomous Oregonator systems
  24. Regular Articles
  25. On certain functional equation related to derivations
  26. The product of a quartic and a sextic number cannot be octic
  27. Combined system of additive functional equations in Banach algebras
  28. Enhanced Young-type inequalities utilizing Kantorovich approach for semidefinite matrices
  29. Local and global solvability for the Boussinesq system in Besov spaces
  30. Construction of 4 x 4 symmetric stochastic matrices with given spectra
  31. A conjecture of Mallows and Sloane with the universal denominator of Hilbert series
  32. The uniqueness of expression for generalized quadratic matrices
  33. On the generalized exponential sums and their fourth power mean
  34. Infinitely many solutions for Schrödinger equations with Hardy potential and Berestycki-Lions conditions
  35. Computing the determinant of a signed graph
  36. Two results on the value distribution of meromorphic functions
  37. Zariski topology on the secondary-like spectrum of a module
  38. On deferred f-statistical convergence for double sequences
  39. About j-Noetherian rings
  40. Strong convergence for weighted sums of (α, β)-mixing random variables and application to simple linear EV regression model
  41. On the distribution of powered numbers
  42. Almost periodic dynamics for a delayed differential neoclassical growth model with discontinuous control strategy
  43. A new distributionally robust reward-risk model for portfolio optimization
  44. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a viscoelastic Shear beam model with no rotary inertia: General and optimal decay results
  45. Silting modules over a class of Morita rings
  46. Non-oscillation of linear differential equations with coefficients containing powers of natural logarithm
  47. Mutually unbiased bases via complex projective trigonometry
  48. Hyers-Ulam stability of a nonlinear partial integro-differential equation of order three
  49. On second-order linear Stieltjes differential equations with non-constant coefficients
  50. Complex dynamics of a nonlinear discrete predator-prey system with Allee effect
  51. The fibering method approach for a Schrödinger-Poisson system with p-Laplacian in bounded domains
  52. On discrete inequalities for some classes of sequences
  53. Boundary value problems for integro-differential and singular higher-order differential equations
  54. Existence and properties of soliton solution for the quasilinear Schrödinger system
  55. Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic ρ-convex functions in two dimension
  56. Endpoint boundedness of toroidal pseudo-differential operators
  57. Matrix stretching
  58. A singular perturbation result for a class of periodic-parabolic BVPs
  59. On Laguerre-Sobolev matrix orthogonal polynomials
  60. Pullback attractors for fractional lattice systems with delays in weighted space
  61. Singularities of spherical surface in R4
  62. Variational approach to Kirchhoff-type second-order impulsive differential systems
  63. Convergence rate of the truncated Euler-Maruyama method for highly nonlinear neutral stochastic differential equations with time-dependent delay
  64. On the energy decay of a coupled nonlinear suspension bridge problem with nonlinear feedback
  65. The limit theorems on extreme order statistics and partial sums of i.i.d. random variables
  66. Hardy-type inequalities for a class of iterated operators and their application to Morrey-type spaces
  67. Solving multi-point problem for Volterra-Fredholm integro-differential equations using Dzhumabaev parameterization method
  68. Finite groups with gcd(χ(1), χc (1)) a prime
  69. Small values and functional laws of the iterated logarithm for operator fractional Brownian motion
  70. The hull-kernel topology on prime ideals in ordered semigroups
  71. ℐ-sn-metrizable spaces and the images of semi-metric spaces
  72. Strong laws for weighted sums of widely orthant dependent random variables and applications
  73. An extension of Schweitzer's inequality to Riemann-Liouville fractional integral
  74. Construction of a class of half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities in the whole plane
  75. Analysis of two-grid method for second-order hyperbolic equation by expanded mixed finite element methods
  76. Note on stability estimation of stochastic difference equations
  77. Trigonometric integrals evaluated in terms of Riemann zeta and Dirichlet beta functions
  78. Purity and hybridness of two tensors on a real hypersurface in complex projective space
  79. Classification of positive solutions for a weighted integral system on the half-space
  80. A quasi-reversibility method for solving nonhomogeneous sideways heat equation
  81. Higher-order nonlocal multipoint q-integral boundary value problems for fractional q-difference equations with dual hybrid terms
  82. Noetherian rings of composite generalized power series
  83. On generalized shifts of the Mellin transform of the Riemann zeta-function
  84. Further results on enumeration of perfect matchings of Cartesian product graphs
  85. A new extended Mulholland's inequality involving one partial sum
  86. Power vector inequalities for operator pairs in Hilbert spaces and their applications
  87. On the common zeros of quasi-modular forms for Γ+0(N) of level N = 1, 2, 3
  88. One special kind of Kloosterman sum and its fourth-power mean
  89. The stability of high ring homomorphisms and derivations on fuzzy Banach algebras
  90. Integral mean estimates of Turán-type inequalities for the polar derivative of a polynomial with restricted zeros
  91. Commutators of multilinear fractional maximal operators with Lipschitz functions on Morrey spaces
  92. Vector optimization problems with weakened convex and weakened affine constraints in linear topological spaces
  93. The curvature entropy inequalities of convex bodies
  94. Brouwer's conjecture for the sum of the k largest Laplacian eigenvalues of some graphs
  95. High-order finite-difference ghost-point methods for elliptic problems in domains with curved boundaries
  96. Riemannian invariants for warped product submanifolds in Q ε m × R and their applications
  97. Generalized quadratic Gauss sums and their 2mth power mean
  98. Euler-α equations in a three-dimensional bounded domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions
  99. Enochs conjecture for cotorsion pairs over recollements of exact categories
  100. Zeros distribution and interlacing property for certain polynomial sequences
  101. Random attractors of Kirchhoff-type reaction–diffusion equations without uniqueness driven by nonlinear colored noise
  102. Study on solutions of the systems of complex product-type PDEs with more general forms in ℂ2
  103. Dynamics in a predator-prey model with predation-driven Allee effect and memory effect
  104. A note on orthogonal decomposition of 𝔰𝔩n over commutative rings
  105. On the δ-chromatic numbers of the Cartesian products of graphs
  106. Binomial convolution sum of divisor functions associated with Dirichlet character modulo 8
  107. Commutator of fractional integral with Lipschitz functions related to Schrödinger operator on local generalized mixed Morrey spaces
  108. System of degenerate parabolic p-Laplacian
  109. Stochastic stability and instability of rumor model
  110. Certain properties and characterizations of a novel family of bivariate 2D-q Hermite polynomials
  111. Stability of an additive-quadratic functional equation in modular spaces
  112. Monotonicity, convexity, and Maclaurin series expansion of Qi's normalized remainder of Maclaurin series expansion with relation to cosine
  113. On k-prime graphs
  114. On the existence of tripartite graphs and n-partite graphs
  115. Classifying pentavalent symmetric graphs of order 12pq
  116. Almost periodic functions on time scales and their properties
  117. Some results on uniqueness and higher order difference equations
  118. Coding of hypersurfaces in Euclidean spaces by a constant vector
  119. Cycle integrals and rational period functions for Γ0+(2) and Γ0+(3)
  120. Degrees of (L, M)-fuzzy bornologies
  121. A matrix approach to determine optimal predictors in a constrained linear mixed model
  122. On ideals of affine semigroups and affine semigroups with maximal embedding dimension
  123. Solutions of linear control systems on Lie groups
  124. A uniqueness result for the fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with strong singularity
  125. On prime spaces of neutrosophic extended triplet groups
  126. On a generalized Krasnoselskii fixed point theorem
  127. On the relation between one-sided duoness and commutators
  128. Non-homogeneous BVPs for second-order symmetric Hamiltonian systems
  129. Erratum
  130. Erratum to “Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence”
  131. Corrigendum
  132. Corrigendum to “Matrix stretching”
  133. Corrigendum to “A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs”
Downloaded on 20.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2024-0082/html
Scroll to top button