Home Pullback attractors for fractional lattice systems with delays in weighted space
Article Open Access

Pullback attractors for fractional lattice systems with delays in weighted space

  • Xintao Li EMAIL logo and Shengwen Wang
Published/Copyright: August 8, 2024

Abstract

This article deals with the asymptotic behavior of fractional lattice systems with time-varying delays in weighted space. First, we establish some sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions. Subsequently, we demonstrate the existence of pullback attractors for the considered fractional lattice systems.

MSC 2010: 35B40; 35B41; 37L30

1 Introduction

In this article, we investigate the limiting dynamics for retarded lattice system with fractional discrete Laplacian as follows:

(1.1) u ˙ i + ( Δ d ) p u i + λ u i f i ( t , u i t ) = g i ( t ) , u i ( s ) = ϕ i ( s τ ) , s [ τ h , τ ] ,

where u i R , i Z , ( Δ d ) p is the fractional discrete Laplacian, p ( 0 , 1 ) , τ R , t > τ , λ is positive number, f ( t , u t ) = ( f i ( t , u i t ) ) i Z is a nonlinear function satisfying certain conditions, g ( t ) = ( g i ( t ) ) i Z is a time dependent term, and ϕ = ( ϕ i ) i Z C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) . The fractional discrete Laplacian ( Δ d ) p simplifies to the discrete Laplacian Δ d if p = 1 .

It is well known that lattice systems arise from spatial discretizations of partial differential equations. Lattice differential equations with standard discrete Laplacian have been extensively studied in the literature. The traveling wave solutions of such equations were investigated by [14]. The chaotic properties of solutions were examined by [5,6] and the references therein. For the asymptotic behavior of lattice systems, we refer the reader to [730]. Of those, the pullback and forward attractors of a nonautonomous lattice system with discrete Laplacian operator have been established in the weighted space in [19], and the pullback attractors of a nonautonomous retarded lattice dynamical systems have been investigated in [11,14].

The fractional discrete Laplacian, which represents the fractional powers of the discrete Laplacian, has been extensively studied in previous works [3135]. The discrete diffusion equations with fractional discrete Laplacian were performed in [35], where the pointwise nonlocal formula and some properties regarding this operator were derived, as well as Schauder estimates in discrete Hölder spaces and the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the considered problem. By employing theories of analytic semigroups and cosine operators, the existence, and uniqueness of solutions for the heat, wave and Schrödinger equations driven by the fractional discrete Laplacian were successfully established in [36]. The relationship between the fractional powers of the discrete Laplacian and the fractional derivative, as defined by Liouville, was studied in [33]. The existence, uniqueness, and upper semi-continuity of random attractors of fractional stochastic lattice systems with linear multiplicative noise and nonlinear multiplicative noise have been recently investigated in [30,31].

Time delays are a common occurrence in various systems and can result in instability, oscillation, and other alterations in system dynamics. The increasing theoretical and practical significance of time-varying systems have prompted a growing number of scholars to engage in their study. The global attractors of discrete lattice systems with fixed delays have been obtained in recent research [710], while studies have also been conducted on systems with time-varying delays in [1115]. However, as far as we know, there are few literatures about the existence of pullback attractors for fractional lattice systems with time-varying delays in weighted space.

This article has been organized as follows. In Section 2, we first establish conditions on the weights for the sequence space and state fundamental assumptions regarding the nonlinearity and forcing term of the lattice system (1.1). We also present some valuable lemmas and properties that greatly facilitate the analysis throughout this article, along with necessary preliminaries on the process formulation of lattice system (1.1). In addition, we express the lattice system (1.1) as an ordinary differential equation on 2 and η 2 , subsequently establish the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the resulting ordinary differential equation on C ( [ τ , ) , C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) ) that can be extended to a solution in C ( [ τ , ) , C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) ) . Furthermore, we demonstrate that the solution generates a nonautonomous two-parameter semigroup or process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ on C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) . In Section 3, First, we construct a closed and bounded absorbing set for the process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ . Subsequently, we establish asymptotic tail estimates for the process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ , which will lead to the attainment of asymptotic compactness and the existence of pullback attractors.

2 Existence of two-parameter semigroup

In this section, we will discuss the existence of two-parameter semigroup generated by the fractional retarded lattice system (1.1) in weighted space.

Given q [ 1 , ) and a sequence of positive weights ( η i ) i Z , a weighted sequence space η q is defined by

η q = u = ( u i ) i Z u i R , i Z η i u i q < ,

with norm u q , η q = i Z η i u i q . Particularly, η 2 is a Hilbert space with the inner product and norm given by

( u , v ) η = i Z η i u i v i , u η 2 = ( u , u ) η , u , v η 2 .

For any i Z , η i = 1 , then weighted space η q transforms into normal space q .

In the rest of this article, we choose the weights that satisfy the following assumption.

( H 1 ) η i > 0 for all i Z and i Z η i η Σ < .

For 0 p 1 , define p by

p = u : Z R u p i Z u i ( 1 + i ) 1 + 2 p < .

Obviously, m n p if 1 m n and 0 p 1 .

For i Z , the discrete Laplacian Δ d is given by

Δ d u i = 2 u i u i 1 u i + 1 .

For 1 < p < 1 and u j R , the fractional discrete Laplacian ( Δ d ) p is defined with the semigroup method [37] as follows:

(2.1) ( Δ d ) p u j = 1 Γ ( p ) 0 ( e t Δ d u j u j ) d t t 1 + p ,

where Γ is the Gamma function with Γ ( p ) = 0 ( e r 1 ) d r r 1 + p < 0 and v j ( t ) = e t Δ d u j is the solution for the semidiscrete heat system

(2.2) t v j = Δ d v j , in Z × ( 0 , ) , v j ( 0 ) = u j , on Z .

The solution of system (2.2) can be expressed using the semidiscrete Fourier transform:

(2.3) e t Δ d u j = i Z G ( j i , t ) u i = i Z G ( i , t ) u j i , t 0 ,

where the semidiscrete heat kernel G ( i , t ) = e 2 t I i ( 2 t ) and I m is the modified Bessel function of order m . Then, the pointwise formula for ( Δ d ) p has been presented as follows.

Lemma 2.1

[35, Lemma 2.3] Let 0 < p < 1 and u = ( u i ) i Z p . Then we have

( Δ d ) p u i = j Z , j i ( u i u j ) K ˜ p ( i j ) ,

where the discrete kernel K ˜ p is given by

K ˜ p ( j ) = 4 p Γ 1 2 + p π Γ ( p ) Γ ( j p ) Γ ( j + 1 + p ) , j Z \ { 0 } , 0 , j = 0 .

In addition, there exist positive constants c ˇ p c ˆ p such that for any j Z \ { 0 } ,

c ˇ p j 1 + 2 p K ˜ p ( j ) c ˆ p j 1 + 2 p .

By using the aforementioned notation, we can rewrite system (1.1) in 2 as follows:

(2.4) u ˙ + ( Δ d ) p u + λ u f ( t , u t ) = g ( t ) , t > τ , u ( s ) = ϕ ( s τ ) , s [ τ h , τ ] ,

where u = ( u i ) i Z , f ( t , u t ) = ( f i ( t , u i t ) ) i Z , and g ( t ) = ( g i ( t ) ) i Z .

It follows from Lemma 2.1 that the fractional discrete Laplacian ( Δ d ) p u is a nonlocal operator on Z and ( Δ d ) p u is well defined bounded function wherever u q ( 1 q ) . In particular, we obtain that, for 0 < p < 1 and u 2 ,

(2.5) ( Δ d ) p u 2 satisfying ( Δ d ) p u 4 p u .

The subsequent lemma will be recurrently employed in diverse estimations of solutions to system (1.1).

Lemma 2.2

[30, Lemma 2.3] Let u , v 2 . Then for every p ( 0 , 1 ) ,

( ( Δ d ) p u , v ) = ( Δ d ) p 2 u , ( Δ d ) p 2 v = 1 2 i Z j Z , j i ( u i u j ) ( v i v j ) K ˜ p ( i j ) .

Furthermore, we assume that the nonlinear term f i ( t , u i t ) in (1.1) includes delay terms as follows:

(2.6) f i ( t , u i t ) = f 1 , i ( u i ( t ) ) + f 2 , i ( u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) ) + h 0 ξ i ( t , s , u i ( t + s ) ) d s .

Regarding the functions f n , i ( n = 1 , 2 ) , ξ i , ρ ( t ) and g ( t ) in (2.6) and (1.1), we assume that

( H 2 ) There exist positive constants L m ( m = 1 , 2 , 3 ) , such that

f n , i ( w 1 ) f n , i ( w 2 ) L n w 1 w 2 , n = 1 , 2 , ξ i ( t , s , w 1 ( t + s ) ) ξ i ( t , s , w 2 ( t + s ) ) L 3 w 1 ( t + s ) w 2 ( t + s )

for all i Z and w n R , n = 1 , 2 .

( H 3 ) There exist positive constants α m ( m = 1 , 2 , 3 ) , and nonnegative functions γ m , i ( t ) ( m = 1 , 2 , 3 ) such that

f 1 , i ( w ) w α 1 w 2 + γ 1 , i ( t ) , f 2 , i ( w ) α 2 w + γ 2 , i ( t ) and ξ i ( t , s , w ) α 3 w + γ 3 , i ( t , s )

for all i Z , w R and s [ h , 0 ] . We set

γ ˜ 3 , i ( t ) = h 0 γ 3 , i ( t , s ) d s .

( H 4 ) ρ C 1 ( R , [ 0 , h ] ) with ρ ( t ) ρ < 1 .

( H 5 ) g ( t ) C b ( R , 2 ) , γ 1 ( t ) = ( γ 1 , i ( t ) ) i Z C b ( R , 1 ) , γ 2 ( t ) = ( γ 2 , i ( t ) ) i Z C b ( R , 2 ) , and γ ˜ 3 ( t ) = ( γ ˜ 3 , i ( t ) ) i Z C b ( R , 2 ) , where C b ( R , m ) = { ζ ( t ) = ( ζ i ( t ) ) i Z : R m is continuous and uniformly bounded with sup t R ζ ( t ) m < } , m = 1 , 2 .

( H 6 ) 2 α 1 α 2 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ e λ h α 2 1 ρ * e λ h 0 .

Hereafter, for t R , u t is defined by

u t ( s ) = ( u i t ( s ) ) i Z = ( u i ( t + s ) ) i Z = u ( t + s ) , s [ h , 0 ] .

Denote by

C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) = { ξ ( t ) : [ h , 0 ] η 2 is continuous with ξ ( t ) C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) = max h t 0 ξ ( t ) η < } .

For any i Z and η i = 1 , weighted space C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) become normal space C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) . We define the map P : R × C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) by

P ( t , v ) = ( Δ d ) p v ( 0 ) + λ v ( 0 ) f ( t , v ) g ( t ) .

Then, system (2.4) can be rewritten as the following functional equation in 2 ,

(2.7) u ˙ + P ( t , u t ) = 0 , t > τ , u τ = ϕ .

The two lemmas presented below are adequate to guarantee the existence of local solutions for system (2.4).

Lemma 2.3

Suppose ( H 2 ) ( H 5 ) hold. Then the map P is continuous and satisfies the Lipschitz condition: for all t R and v 1 , v 2 C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) , there exists a positive constant L such that

P ( t , v 1 ) P ( t , v 2 ) L v 1 v 2 C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) .

Proof

By ( H 2 )–( H 5 ), we find that P is well defined. Given ( t , v ) R × C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) , consider t n t in R and v n v in C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) , we obtain that

(2.8) P ( t n , v n ) P ( t , v ) ( Δ d ) p ( v n ( 0 ) v ( 0 ) ) + λ v n ( 0 ) v ( 0 ) + f ( t n , v n ) f ( t , v ) + g ( t n ) g ( t ) .

By the boundedness of the sequence ( v n ) n N in C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) and ( H 2 ) ( H 4 ) , we can find that

(2.9) f ( t n , v n ) f ( t , v ) 2 3 i Z f 1 , i ( v i n ( 0 ) ) f 1 , i ( v i ( 0 ) ) 2 + 3 i Z f 2 , i ( v i n ( ρ ( t n ) ) ) f 2 , i ( v i ( ρ ( t ) ) ) 2 + 3 i Z h 0 ξ i ( t , s , v i n ( s ) ) ξ i ( t , s , v i ( s ) ) d s 2 3 ( L 1 2 + L 2 2 ) v n v C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 + 3 L 3 2 i Z h 0 v i n ( s ) v i ( s ) d s 2 3 ( L 1 2 + L 2 2 ) v n v C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 + 3 L 3 2 h i Z h 0 v i n ( s ) v i ( s ) 2 d s 3 ( L 1 2 + L 2 2 ) v n v C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 + 3 L 3 2 h 2 v n v C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 = 3 ( L 1 2 + L 2 2 + L 3 2 h 2 ) v n v C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 ,

which along with (2.5), (2.8), and ( H 5 ) implies the continuity of P . The Lipschitz condition can be proven in a similar manner.□

By Lemma 2.3, it is easy to obtain the following lemma.

Lemma 2.4

Suppose ( H 2 ) ( H 5 ) hold. Then the map P is bounded.

By Lemmas 2.3 and 2.4, and the standard theory of the functional equations, one can deduce that for τ R and ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) , there exists T > 0 such that system (2.4) has a unique solution u t ( , τ , ϕ ) C ( [ τ , τ + T ] , C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) ) . As demonstrated below, this local solution is defined for all t τ .

Lemma 2.5

Suppose ( H 2 ) ( H 6 ) hold. Then for every ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) , τ R , and t τ , the solution u of system (2.4) satisfies

sup h s 0 u t ( s ) 2 e λ ( t τ ) e λ h 1 + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ + α 2 1 ρ * e λ h λ ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 + 4 λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 2 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 .

Proof

Take the inner product of system (2.4) with u in 2 , we obtain

(2.10) 1 2 d d t u ( t ) 2 + ( ( Δ d ) p u ( t ) , u ( t ) ) + λ u ( t ) 2 ( f ( t , u t ) , u ( t ) ) = ( g ( t ) , u ( t ) ) .

By Lemma 2.2, we obtain

(2.11) ( ( Δ d ) p u ( t ) , u ( t ) ) = ( Δ d ) p 2 u ( t ) 2 .

By ( H 5 ) and Young’s inequality, we have

(2.12) ( g ( t ) , u ( t ) ) 4 λ sup t R g ( t ) 2 + λ 16 u ( t ) 2 4 λ g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 16 u ( t ) 2 .

For the delay term of (2.10), we obtain

(2.13) ( f ( t , u t ) , u ( t ) ) = i Z f 1 , i ( u i ( t ) ) u i ( t ) + i Z f 2 , i ( u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) ) u i ( t ) + i Z h 0 ξ i ( t , s , u i ( t + s ) ) d s u i ( t ) .

By ( H 3 ) , ( H 5 ) , and Young’s inequality, we obtain

(2.14) i Z f 1 , i ( u i ( t ) ) u i ( t ) i Z ( α 1 u i ( t ) 2 + γ 1 , i ( t ) ) α 1 u ( t ) 2 + γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) ,

(2.15) i Z f 2 , i ( u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) ) u i ( t ) i Z ( α 2 u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) + γ 2 , i ( t ) ) u i ( t ) = α 2 i Z u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) u i ( t ) + i Z γ 2 , i ( t ) u i ( t ) α 2 2 u ( t ρ ( t ) ) 2 + α 2 2 u ( t ) 2 + 4 λ γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 16 u ( t ) 2 ,

and

(2.16) i Z h 0 ξ i ( t , s , u i ( t + s ) ) d s u i ( t ) i Z h 0 ( α 3 u i ( t + s ) + γ 3 , i ( t , s ) ) d s u i ( t ) α 3 i Z h 0 u i ( t + s ) d s 2 1 2 i Z u i 2 ( t ) 1 2 + i Z h 0 γ 3 , i ( t , s ) d s 2 1 2 i Z u i 2 ( t ) 1 2 α 3 h h 0 u ( t + s ) 2 d s 1 2 + γ ˜ 3 ( t ) u ( t ) 4 α 3 2 h λ h 0 u ( t + s ) 2 d s + 4 λ γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 8 u ( t ) 2 .

It follows from (2.10)–(2.16) that

d d t u ( t ) 2 + λ u ( t ) 2 ( 2 α 1 α 2 ) u ( t ) 2 + α 2 u ( t ρ ( t ) ) 2 + 8 α 3 2 h λ h 0 u ( t + s ) 2 d s + 8 λ g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 .

Integrating the aforementioned inequality over ( τ , t ) , we obtain

(2.17) e λ t u ( t ) 2 e λ τ u ( τ ) 2 ( 2 α 1 α 2 ) τ t e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r + α 2 τ t e λ r u ( r ρ ( r ) ) 2 d r + 8 α 3 2 h λ τ t e λ r h 0 u ( r + s ) 2 d s d r + 8 e λ t λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 .

First, we estimate the time-varying delay term of (2.17). By ( H 4 ) , we have

(2.18) α 2 τ t e λ r u ( r ρ ( r ) ) 2 d r α 2 1 ρ * e λ h τ h t e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r = α 2 1 ρ * e λ h τ h τ e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r + α 2 1 ρ * e λ h τ t e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r α 2 1 ρ * e λ ( h + τ ) λ ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 + α 2 1 ρ * e λ h τ t e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r .

Next, we proceed to analyze the double integral term in (2.17),

(2.19) 8 α 3 2 h λ τ t e λ r h 0 u ( r + s ) 2 d s d r = 8 α 3 2 h λ h 0 τ t e λ r u ( r + s ) 2 d r d s 8 α 3 2 h λ e λ h h 0 τ h t e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r d s = 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ e λ h τ h τ e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r + τ t e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ 2 e λ ( h + τ ) ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ e λ h τ t e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r .

By (2.17)–(2.19), we obtain

e λ t u ( t ) 2 e λ τ + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ + α 2 1 ρ * e λ ( h + τ ) λ ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 2 α 1 α 2 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ e λ h α 2 1 ρ * e λ h τ t e λ r u ( r ) 2 d r + 8 e λ t λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 ,

which along with ( H 6 ) implies that

(2.20) u ( t ) 2 e λ ( t τ ) 1 + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ + α 2 1 ρ * e λ h λ ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 + 8 λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 .

Replacing t in (2.20) by t + s , with s [ h , 0 ] , to deduce that

sup h s 0 u t ( s ) 2 e λ ( t τ ) e λ h + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ + α 2 1 ρ * e 2 λ h λ ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) 2 + 8 λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 .

This completes the proof.□

The solutions to system (2.4) in 2 are continuous in their initial data, and using the uniqueness of solution, they fulfill the two-parameter semigroup property

u t 2 ( , τ , ϕ , g ) = u t 2 ( , t 1 , u t 1 ( , τ , ϕ , g ) ) , τ t 1 t 2 .

The subsequent lemma establishes the Lipschitz continuity of these solutions in C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) , which is a prerequisite for extending the solution operator from C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) to C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) .

Lemma 2.6

Suppose ( H 1 ) ( H 5 ) hold. Furthermore, ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) and g 1 , g 2 C b ( R , 2 ) . Let u 1 and u 2 be the solutions of system (2.4) with g replaced by g 1 and g 2 , respectively. Then for every τ R and T > 0 , there exists a positive constant M = M ( τ , T ) such that for all t [ τ , τ + T ] ,

sup h s 0 u t 1 ( s , τ , ϕ 1 ) u t 2 ( s , τ , ϕ 2 ) η 2 M ϕ 1 ϕ 2 C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + M g 1 g 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 .

Proof

Let u ¯ ( t ) = u 1 ( t ) u 2 ( t ) and ϕ ¯ = ϕ 1 ϕ 2 . By system (2.4), we obtain

d u ¯ ( t ) d t + ( Δ d ) p u ¯ ( t ) + λ u ¯ ( t ) ( f ( t , u t 1 ) f ( t , u t 2 ) ) = g 1 ( t ) g 2 ( t ) .

Taking the inner with u ¯ in η 2 , we obtain

(2.21) 1 2 d d t u ¯ ( t ) η 2 + ( ( Δ d ) p u ¯ ( t ) , u ¯ ( t ) ) η + λ u ¯ ( t ) η 2 = ( f ( t , u t 1 ) f ( t , u t 2 ) , u ¯ ( t ) ) η + ( g 1 ( t ) g 2 ( t ) , u ¯ ( t ) ) η .

By Lemma 2.2, we obtain

(2.22) ( ( Δ d ) p u ¯ ( t ) , u ¯ ( t ) ) η = ( Δ d ) p 2 u ¯ ( t ) η 2 .

By ( H 1 ) , ( H 5 ) , and Young’s inequality, we have

(2.23) ( g 1 ( t ) g 2 ( t ) , u ¯ ( t ) ) η 1 2 λ sup t R g 1 ( t ) g 2 ( t ) η 2 + λ 2 u ¯ ( t ) η 2 η Σ 2 λ g 1 g 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 2 u ¯ ( t ) η 2 .

By ( H 2 ) , we obtain

(2.24) ( f ( t , u t 1 ) f ( t , u t 2 ) , u ¯ ( t ) ) η = i Z η i ( f 1 , i ( u i 1 ) f 1 , i ( u i 2 ) ) u ¯ i + i Z η i ( f 2 , i ( u i 1 ( t ρ ( t ) ) ) f 2 , i ( u i 2 ( t ρ ( t ) ) ) ) u ¯ i + i Z η i h 0 ( ξ i ( t , s , u i 1 ( t + s ) ) ξ i ( t , s , u i 2 ( t + s ) ) ) d s u ¯ i L 1 u ¯ η 2 + L 2 2 u ¯ η 2 + L 2 2 u ¯ ( t ρ ( t ) ) η 2 + L 3 i Z η i h 0 u ¯ i ( t + s ) d s u ¯ i .

It follows from (2.21)–(2.24) that

d d t u ¯ η 2 ( 2 L 1 + L 2 ) u ¯ η 2 + L 2 u ¯ ( t ρ ( t ) ) η 2 + η Σ λ g 1 g 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + 2 L 3 i Z η i h 0 u ¯ i ( t + s ) d s u ¯ i .

For τ R , T > 0 , and t [ τ , τ + T ] , integrating the aforementioned inequality over ( τ , t ) , we obtain

(2.25) u ¯ ( t ) η 2 u ¯ ( τ ) η 2 + ( 2 L 1 + L 2 ) τ t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r + L 2 τ t u ¯ ( r ρ ( r ) ) η 2 d r + T η Σ λ g 1 g 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + 2 L 3 τ t i Z η i h 0 u ¯ i ( r + s ) d s u ¯ i ( r ) d r .

As to the time-varying delay term in (2.25), by ( H 4 ) , we have

(2.26) L 2 τ t u ¯ ( r ρ ( r ) ) η 2 d r L 2 1 ρ * τ h t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r L 2 h 1 ρ * ϕ ¯ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + L 2 1 ρ * τ t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r .

Next, we analyze the last term in (2.25),

2 L 3 τ t i Z η i h 0 u ¯ i ( r + s ) d s u ¯ i ( r ) d r L 3 h h 0 τ t u ( r + s ) η 2 d r d s + L 3 τ t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r L 3 h h 0 τ h t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r d s + L 3 τ t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r = L 3 h 2 τ h τ u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r + τ t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r + L 3 τ t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r L 3 h 3 ϕ ¯ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + L 3 ( h 2 + 1 ) τ t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r ,

which along with (2.25) and (2.26) implies that

(2.27) u ¯ ( t ) η 2 1 + L 2 h 1 ρ * + L 3 h 3 ϕ ¯ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + T η Σ λ g 1 g 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + 2 L 1 + L 2 + L 2 1 ρ * + L 3 ( h 2 + 1 ) τ t u ¯ ( r ) η 2 d r .

By (2.27) and Gronwall’s inequality, we have

(2.28) u ¯ ( t ) η 2 1 + L 2 h 1 ρ * + L 3 h 3 ϕ ¯ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + T η Σ λ g 1 g 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 e c 1 t ,

where c 1 = 2 L 1 + L 2 + L 2 1 ρ * + L 3 ( h 2 + 1 ) . Replacing t in (2.28) by t + s , with t + s τ and s [ h , 0 ] , we obtain

(2.29) sup h s 0 u ¯ t ( s ) η 2 1 + L 2 h 1 ρ * + L 3 h 3 ϕ ¯ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + T η Σ λ g 1 g 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 e c 1 ( t + h ) .

On the other hand, if t + s [ τ h , τ ] , then we can obtain

sup h s 0 u ¯ t ( s ) η 2 = sup h s 0 u ¯ ( t + s ) η 2 = ϕ ¯ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 ,

which along with (2.29) implies the desired result. This completes the proof.□

Now, the main theorem of this section is hereby presented.

Theorem 2.1

Suppose ( H 1 ) ( H 6 ) hold. For every τ R and t τ , the solution u of system (2.4) generates a two-parameter semigroup { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ in C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) .

Proof

Given τ R and T > 0 , by Lemma 2.6, there exists a continuous mapping S : C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) × C b ( R , 2 ) C ( [ τ , τ + T ] , C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) ) such that

S ( ϕ , g ) = u t ( , τ , ϕ , g ) , τ R , ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) , g C b ( R , 2 ) ,

where u t ( , τ , ϕ , g ) is the unique solution to system (2.4) in C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) . Furthermore, S is continuous in ( ϕ , g ) from C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) × C b ( R , 2 ) C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) × C b ( R , η 2 ) into C ( [ τ , τ + T ] , C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) ) .

Since C ( [ h , 0 ] , 2 ) is dense in C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) and C b ( R , 2 ) is dense in C b ( R , η 2 ) , the mapping S can be uniquely extended to a mapping S from C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) × C b ( R , η 2 ) into C ( [ τ , τ + T ] , C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) ) with

u t ( , τ , ϕ , g ) = S ( ϕ , g ) , τ R , ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) , g C b ( R , η 2 ) ,

where u t ( , τ , ϕ , g ) = u t ( , τ , ϕ ) is the unique solution to system (2.4) in C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) .

For every τ R and t τ , define mapping Ψ ( t , τ ) ( ) : C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) by

(2.30) Ψ ( t , τ ) ( ϕ ) = u t ( , τ , ϕ ) , t [ τ , τ + T ] , ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) .

The continuity of the solution mapping u in its initial data, as proven by Lemma 2.6, implies that the mapping Ψ is also continuous in both τ and ϕ . Therefore, Ψ can be regarded as a nonautonomous two-parameter semigroup on C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) . This completes the proof.□

3 Existence of pullback attractors

In this section, we investigate the pullback dynamics of the process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ defined by equation (2.30) in Theorem 2.1. First, we will construct a pullback absorbing set for the process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ . Subsequently, we will establish asymptotic tail estimates for the process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ , which will lead to the attainment of asymptotic compactness and the existence of pullback attractors.

Lemma 3.1

Suppose ( H 1 ) ( H 6 ) hold. Then the process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ associated with system (2.4) has a closed and bounded pullback absorbing set Q ρ , η C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) , which is positively invariant.

Proof

Take the inner product of system (2.4) with u in η 2 , we obtain

(3.1) 1 2 d d t u ( t ) η 2 + ( ( Δ d ) p u ( t ) , u ( t ) ) η + λ u ( t ) η 2 ( f ( t , u t ) , u ( t ) ) η = ( g ( t ) , u ( t ) ) η .

By Lemma 2.2, we obtain

(3.2) ( ( Δ d ) p u ( t ) , u ( t ) ) η = ( Δ d ) p 2 u ( t ) η 2 .

By ( H 1 ) , ( H 5 ) , and Young’s inequality, we have

(3.3) ( g ( t ) , u ( t ) ) η 4 η Σ λ g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 16 u ( t ) η 2 .

For the delay term of (3.1), by the similar argument as in (2.14)–(2.16), we have

( f ( t , u t ) , u ( t ) ) η = i Z η i f 1 , i ( u i ( t ) ) u i ( t ) + i Z η i f 2 , i ( u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) ) u i ( t ) + i Z h 0 η i ξ i ( t , s , u i ( t + s ) ) d s u i ( t ) i Z η i ( α 1 u i ( t ) 2 + γ 1 , i ( t ) ) + i Z η i ( α 2 u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) + γ 2 , i ( t ) ) u i ( t ) + i Z η i h 0 ( α 3 u i ( t + s ) + γ 3 , i ( t , s ) ) d s u i ( t ) 3 λ 16 α 1 + α 2 2 u ( t ) η 2 + α 2 2 u ( t ρ ( t ) ) η 2 + 4 α 3 2 h λ h 0 u ( t + s ) η 2 d s + 4 η Σ λ λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 ,

which along with (3.1)–(3.3) implies that

d d t u ( t ) η 2 + 3 λ 2 u ( t ) η 2 + 2 ( Δ d ) p 2 u ( t ) η 2 8 η Σ λ g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 ( 2 α 1 α 2 ) u ( t ) η 2 + α 2 u ( t ρ ( t ) ) η 2 + 8 α 3 2 h λ h 0 u ( t + s ) η 2 d s .

Integrating the aforementioned inequality over ( τ , t ) , we obtain

(3.4) e λ t u ( t ) η 2 + λ 2 τ t e λ r u ( r ) η 2 d r + 2 τ t e λ r ( Δ d ) p 2 u ( r ) η 2 d r e λ τ u ( τ ) η 2 8 η Σ λ g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 τ t e λ r d r ( 2 α 1 α 2 ) τ t e λ r u ( r ) η 2 d r + α 2 τ t e λ r u ( r ρ ( r ) ) η 2 d r + 8 α 3 2 h λ τ t e λ r h 0 u ( r + s ) η 2 d s d r .

For the time-varying delay term in (3.4), by ( H 4 ) , we have

(3.5) α 2 τ t e λ r u ( r ρ ( r ) ) η 2 d r α 2 1 ρ * e λ h τ h t e λ r u ( r ) η 2 d r α 2 1 ρ * e λ ( h + τ ) λ ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + e λ h τ t e λ r u ( r ) η 2 d r .

Next, we analyze the last term in (3.4),

(3.6) 8 α 3 2 h λ τ t e λ r h 0 u ( r + s ) η 2 d s d r 8 α 3 2 h λ e λ h h 0 τ h t e λ r u ( r ) η 2 d r d s 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ 2 e λ ( h + τ ) ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ e λ h τ t e λ r u ( r ) η 2 d r .

It follows from (3.4)–(3.6) and ( H 6 ) that

(3.7) u ( t ) η 2 + λ 2 e λ t τ t e λ r u ( r ) η 2 d r + 2 e λ t τ t e λ r ( Δ d ) p 2 u ( r ) η 2 d r e λ ( t τ ) 1 + e λ h α 2 ( 1 ρ * ) λ + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ 2 ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + 8 η Σ λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 .

Replacing t in (3.7) by t + s , with s [ h , 0 ] , we obtain

(3.8) sup h s 0 u t ( s ) η 2 e λ ( t τ ) e λ h 1 + e λ h α 2 ( 1 ρ * ) λ + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ 2 ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + 8 η Σ λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 .

For every ε > 0 , there exists T 1 ( ε ) > 0 such that for all t τ > T 1 ( ε ) ,

(3.9) sup h s 0 u t ( s ) η 2 8 η Σ λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + ε .

Set ε = 1 , we define the closed and bounded set of C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) ,

Q ρ , η = { u C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) : sup h s 0 u t ( s ) η 2 R ρ , η } ,

where R ρ , η = 8 η Σ λ 2 g C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 C b ( R , 1 ) + γ 2 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 C b ( R , 2 ) 2 + 1 . By (3.9), the set Q ρ , η is an absorbing set for nonautonomous two-parameter semigroup { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ on C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) in the pullback senses. At the same time, we can obtain that Q ρ , η is positively invariant for { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ on C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) . This completes the proof.□

The next step involves obtaining a uniform estimate on the tails of solutions. To achieve this, we select a smooth function ϑ ( s ) that satisfies 0 ϑ ( s ) 1 for all s R + , and

ϑ ( s ) = 0 , 0 s 1 , 1 , s 2 .

Moreover, given p ( 0 , 1 ) , by Lemma 3.3 of [16], we obtain that for all i Z and k N ,

(3.10) j Z , j i ϑ i k ϑ j k 2 K ˜ p ( i j ) L p 2 k 2 p .

Lemma 3.2

Suppose ( H 1 ) ( H 6 ) hold. Then, for any ε > 0 , there exist T ( ε ) > 0 and K ( ε ) N such that

sup h s 0 i K ( ε ) η i u i ( t + s , τ , ϕ ) 2 ε , for all ϕ Q ρ , η and τ t T ( ε ) .

Proof

Taking the inner product of system (2.4) with y = ( ϑ ( i k ) u i ) i Z in η 2 , we have

(3.11) 1 2 d d t i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ) 2 + λ i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ) 2 = ( ( d ) p u ( t ) , y ) η + ( f ( t , u t ) , y ) η + ( g ( t ) , y ) η .

By Lemma 2.2 and (3.10), we have

(3.12) ( ( d ) p u , y ) η = ( d ) p 2 u , ( d ) p 2 y η = 1 2 i Z η i j Z , j i ( u i u j ) ϑ i k u i ϑ j k u j K ˜ p ( i j ) = 1 2 i Z η i j Z , j i ( u i u j ) ϑ i k ϑ j k u i K ˜ p ( i j ) 1 2 i Z η i j Z , j i ( u i u j ) 2 ϑ j k K ˜ p ( i j ) 1 2 u η i Z η i j Z , j i ϑ i k ϑ j k 2 K ˜ p ( i j ) j Z , j i ( ( u i u j ) 2 K ˜ p ( i j ) ) 1 2 2 4 L p k p u η 2 + ( d ) p 2 u η 2 .

As to the delay term in (3.11), arguing as in (2.14)–(2.16), we have

(3.13) ( f ( t , u t ) , y ) η 3 λ 16 α 1 + α 2 2 i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ) 2 + α 2 2 i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) 2 + 4 α 3 2 h λ h 0 i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t + s ) 2 d s + 4 λ i Z η i ϑ i k λ 4 γ 1 , i ( t ) + γ 2 , i ( t ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 , i ( t ) 2 .

For the last term of (3.11), we obtain

(3.14) ( g ( t ) , y ) η λ 16 i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ) 2 + 4 λ i Z η i ϑ i k g i ( t ) 2 .

It follows from (3.11)–(3.14) that

d d t e λ t i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ) 2 2 2 L p k p e λ t u ( t ) η 2 + ( d ) p 2 u ( t ) η 2 ( 2 α 1 α 2 ) e λ t i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ) 2 + α 2 e λ t i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ρ ( t ) ) 2 + 8 α 3 2 h λ e λ t h 0 i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t + s ) 2 d s + 8 λ e λ t i Z η i ϑ i k g i ( t ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 , i ( t ) + γ 2 , i ( t ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 , i ( t ) 2 ,

which implies that

(3.15) i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ) 2 e λ ( t τ ) i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( τ ) 2 2 2 L p k p e λ t τ t e λ r u ( r ) η 2 + ( d ) p 2 u ( r ) η 2 d r ( 2 α 1 α 2 ) e λ t τ t e λ r i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r ) 2 d r + α 2 e λ t τ t e λ r i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r ρ ( r ) ) 2 d r + 8 α 3 2 h λ e λ t τ t e λ r h 0 i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r + s ) 2 d s d r + 8 λ e λ t τ t e λ r i Z η i ϑ i k g i ( r ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 , i ( r ) + γ 2 , i ( r ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 , i ( r ) 2 d r .

As to the time-varying delay term in (3.15), by ( H 4 ) , we have

(3.16) α 2 e λ t τ t e λ r i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r ρ ( r ) ) 2 d r α 2 1 ρ * e λ ( t h ) τ h t e λ r i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r ) 2 d r α 2 1 ρ * e λ ( t h τ ) λ ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + α 2 1 ρ * e λ ( t h ) τ t e λ r i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r ) 2 d r .

For the double integral term in (3.15), we obtain

(3.17) 8 α 3 2 h λ e λ t τ t e λ r h 0 i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r + s ) 2 d s d r 8 α 3 2 h λ e λ ( t h ) h 0 τ h t e λ r i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r ) 2 d r d s 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ 2 e λ ( t h τ ) ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ e λ ( t h ) τ t e λ r i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( r ) 2 d r .

It follows from (3.15)–(3.17) and ( H 6 ) that

i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t ) 2 e λ ( t τ ) 1 + e λ h α 2 ( 1 ρ * ) λ + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ 2 ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + 2 2 L p k p τ t e λ ( t r ) u ( r ) η 2 + ( d ) p 2 u ( r ) η 2 d r + 8 λ τ t e λ ( t r ) i Z η i ϑ i k ( γ 1 , i ( r ) + g i ( r ) 2 + γ 2 , i ( r ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 , i ( r ) 2 ) d r .

Replacing t by t + s in the aforementioned inequality, with s [ h , 0 ] , we have

(3.18) sup s [ h , 0 ] i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t + s ) 2 e λ ( t τ ) e λ h + e 2 λ h α 2 ( 1 ρ * ) λ + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ 2 ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 + e λ h 2 2 L p k p τ t e ( t r ) u ( r ) η 2 + ( d ) p 2 u ( r ) η 2 d r + 8 λ 2 sup t R g ( t ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 ( t ) 1 + γ 2 ( t ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 ( t ) 2 i Z η i ϑ i k .

Since ϕ Q ρ , η , there exists T 2 = T 2 ( ε ) , such that for all t τ T 2 ,

(3.19) e λ ( t τ ) e λ h + e 2 λ h α 2 ( 1 ρ * ) λ + 8 α 3 2 h 2 λ 2 ϕ C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) 2 ε .

Since p ( 0 , 1 ) and L p is independent of p , given ε > 0 , there exists K 1 = K 1 ( ε ) 1 such that for all k K 1 ,

e λ h 2 2 L p k p ( u ( r ) η 2 + ( d ) p 2 u ( r ) η 2 ) ε ( u ( r ) η 2 + ( d ) p 2 u ( r ) η 2 ) ,

which along with (3.7) implies that

(3.20) e λ h 2 2 L p k p τ t e λ ( t r ) u ( r ) η 2 + ( d ) p 2 u ( r ) η 2 d r c 2 ε .

By ( H 1 ) , there exists K 2 = K 2 ( ε ) K 1 , such that for all k K 2 ,

(3.21) 8 λ 2 sup t R g ( t ) 2 + λ 4 γ 1 ( t ) 1 + γ 2 ( t ) 2 + γ ˜ 3 ( t ) 2 i Z η i ϑ i k ε .

It follows from (3.18)–(3.21) that for all t τ T 2 and k K 2 ,

sup s [ h , 0 ] i 2 k η i u i ( t + s ) 2 sup s [ h , 0 ] i Z η i ϑ i k u i ( t + s ) 2 ( c 2 + 2 ) ε .

This completes the proof.

Lemma 3.3

Suppose ( H 1 ) ( H 6 ) hold. Then the process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ defined by (2.30) associated with system (2.4) is asymptotically compact.

Proof

For any given bounded set B C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) , there exists T ( B ) > 0 such that Ψ ( t , τ ) B Q ρ , η when t τ T ( B ) , we need to prove that each sequence u t n n = Ψ ( t n , τ ) ϕ n Q ρ , η has a convergent subsequence in C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) as t n .

By (3.8), we obtain that the sequence u t n n ( ) is bounded in C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) . Therefore, for any fixed s [ h , 0 ] , there exist a subsequence, which we will still denote by u n ( t n + s ) and ς ( s ) η 2 such that

(3.22) u n ( t n + s ) ς ( s ) weakly in η 2 as n .

Next, we will show that the convergence in (3.22) is strong. Given ε > 0 , by Lemma 3.2, there exist I 1 ( ε ) > 0 and N 1 ( ε ) > 0 such that

(3.23) sup s [ h , 0 ] i I 1 ( ε ) η i u i n ( t n + s ) 2 ε , n N 1 ( ε ) .

Since ς ( s ) η 2 , then there exists I 2 ( ε ) > 0 such that

(3.24) i I 2 ( ε ) η i ς i ( s ) 2 ε .

Let I ( ε ) = max { I 1 ( ε ) , I 2 ( ε ) } . By (3.22), we obtain that there exists N 2 ( ε ) > 0 such that

(3.25) i < I ( ε ) η i u i n ( t n + s ) ς i ( s ) 2 ε , n N 2 ( ε ) .

Let N ( ε ) = max { N 1 ( ε ) , N 2 ( ε ) } . By (3.24) and (3.25), for any n N ( ε ) , we have

u n ( t n + s ) ς ( s ) η 2 i < I η i u i n ( t n + s ) ς i ( s ) 2 + 2 i I η i u i n ( t n + s ) 2 + 2 i I η i ς i ( s ) 2 5 ε .

Therefore, for each s [ h , 0 ] , u n ( t n + s ) ς ( s ) strongly in η 2 as n .

The next step is to demonstrate the equicontinuity of u n ( t n + s ) in [ h , 0 ] . By utilizing the integral representation of solution to system (2.4), we have

(3.26) u n ( t n + s 1 ) u n ( t n + s 2 ) η 2 t n + s 1 t n + s 2 P ( r , u r n ) η d r

for any h s 1 s 2 0 . By using (3.26) and Lemma 2.4, we obtain that there exists a positive constant c 3 such that u n ( t n + s 1 ) u n ( t n + s 2 ) η 2 c 3 ( s 2 s 1 ) , n N , which implies the property of equicontinuity. By the Ascoli-Arzelà theorem, we can deduce that

(3.27) u t n n ( ) ς ( ) strong in C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) .

This completes the proof.□

As an immediate consequence of Lemmaa 3.1, 3.3, and Theorem 2.7 in [19], we obtain the main result of this section as follows:

Theorem 3.1

Suppose ( H 1 ) ( H 6 ) hold. Then the process { Ψ ( t , τ ) } t τ defined by (2.30) associated with system (2.4) has a pullback attractor A = { A t } t R in C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) , which pullback attracts every bounded subsets of C ( [ h , 0 ] , η 2 ) .

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the Start-up Research Fund for High-Level Talents of Liupanshui Normal University (LPSSYKYJJ202311) and the Scientific Research and Cultivation Project of Liupanshui Normal University (LPSSY2023KJYBPY14).

  2. Author contributions: All the authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during this study.

References

[1] S. N. Chow, J. Mallet-Paret, and W. Shen, Traveling waves in lattice dynamical systems, J. Differential Equations 149 (1998), no. 2, 248–291, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.1998.3478. 10.1006/jdeq.1998.3478Search in Google Scholar

[2] C. E. Elmer and E. S. Van Vleck, Analysis and computation of traveling wave solutions of bistable differential-difference equations, Nonlinearity 12 (1999), no. 4, 771–798, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/12/4/303. 10.1088/0951-7715/12/4/303Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. E. Elmer and E. S. Van Vleck, Traveling waves solutions for bistable differential-difference equations with periodic diffusion, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 61 (2001), no. 5, 1648–1679, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139999357113. 10.1137/S0036139999357113Search in Google Scholar

[4] T. Erneux and G. Nicolis, Propagating waves in discrete bistable reaction diffusion systems, Phys. D 67 (1993), 237–244, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90208-I. 10.1016/0167-2789(93)90208-ISearch in Google Scholar

[5] S. N. Chow and J. Mallet-Paret, Pattern formation and spatial chaos in lattice dynamical systems. I, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 42 (1995), no. 10, 746–751, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/81.473583. 10.1109/81.473583Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. N. Chow and W. Shen, Dynamics in a discrete Nagumo equation: spatial topological chaos, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 55 (1995), no. 6, 1764–1781, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139994261757. 10.1137/S0036139994261757Search in Google Scholar

[7] D. Li, B. Wang, and X. Wang, Limiting behavior of invariant measures of stochastic delay lattice systems, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 34 (2022), 1453–1487, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-021-10011-7. 10.1007/s10884-021-10011-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] L. Xu and W. Yan, Stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo systems with delay, Taiwan. J. Math. 16 (2012), no. 3, 1079–1103, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11650/twjm/1500406680. 10.11650/twjm/1500406680Search in Google Scholar

[9] W. Yan, Y. Li, and S. Ji, Random attractors for first order stochastic retarded lattice dynamical systems, J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010), 032702, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3319566. 10.1063/1.3319566Search in Google Scholar

[10] X. Wang, K. Lu, and B. Wang, Exponential stability of non-autonomous stochastic delay lattice systems with multiplicative noise, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 28 (2016), 1309–1335, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-015-9448-8. 10.1007/s10884-015-9448-8Search in Google Scholar

[11] T. Caraballo, F. Morillas, and J. Valero, Attractors for non-autonomous retarded lattice dynamical systems, Nonauton. Dyn. Syst. 2 (2015), no. 1, 31–51, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/msds-2015-0003. 10.1515/msds-2015-0003Search in Google Scholar

[12] D. Li and L. Shi, Upper semicontinuity of random attractors of stochastic discrete complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with time-varying delays in the delay, J. Difference Equ. Appl. 24 (2018), no. 6, 872–897, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2018.1437913. 10.1080/10236198.2018.1437913Search in Google Scholar

[13] D. Li, L. Shi, and X. Wang, Long term behavior of stochastic discrete complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with time delays in weighted spaces, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 24 (2019), no. 9, 5121–5148, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2019046. 10.3934/dcdsb.2019046Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. M. Pereira, Pullback attractor for a nonlocal discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation with delays, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 93 (2021), 1–18, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2021.1.93. 10.14232/ejqtde.2021.1.93Search in Google Scholar

[15] S. Yang, Y. Li, and T. Caraballo, Dynamical stability of random delayed FitzHugh-Nagumo lattice systems driven by nonlinear Wong-Zakai noise, J. Math. Phys. 63 (2022), 111512, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125383. 10.1063/5.0125383Search in Google Scholar

[16] Y. Chen and X. Wang, Random attractors for stochastic discrete complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with long-range interactions, J. Math. Phys. 63 (2022), 032701, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0077971. 10.1063/5.0077971Search in Google Scholar

[17] Z. Chen, X. Li, and B. Wang, Invariant measures of stochastic delay lattice systems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 26 (2021), no. 6, 3235–3269, DOI: https://10.3934/dcdsb.2020226. 10.3934/dcdsb.2020226Search in Google Scholar

[18] Z. Chen, D. Yang, and S. Zhong, Limiting dynamics for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo lattice systems in weighted spaces, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 36 (2022), 321–352, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10145-2. 10.1007/s10884-022-10145-2Search in Google Scholar

[19] X. Han and P. E. Kloeden, Pullback and forward dynamics of nonautonomous Laplacian lattice systems on weighted spaces, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 15 (2022), no. 10, 2909–2927, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2021143. 10.3934/dcdss.2021143Search in Google Scholar

[20] J. M. Pereira, Global attractor for a generalized discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Acta. Appl. Math. 134 (2014), 173–183, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-014-9877-0. 10.1007/s10440-014-9877-0Search in Google Scholar

[21] B. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous lattice systems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 331 (2007), no. 1, 121–136, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.070. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.08.070Search in Google Scholar

[22] B. Wang, Dynamics of systems on infinite lattices, J. Differential Equations 221 (2006), no. 1, 224–245, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2005.01.003. 10.1016/j.jde.2005.01.003Search in Google Scholar

[23] B. Wang and R. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of stochastic Schrödinger lattice systems driven by nonlinear noise, Stoch. Anal. Appl. 38 (2020), no. 2, 213–237, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2019.1679646. 10.1080/07362994.2019.1679646Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. Wang and B. Wang, Random dynamics of p-Laplacian lattice systems driven by infinite-dimensional nonlinear noise, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 130 (2020), no. 12, 7431–7462, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2020.08.002. 10.1016/j.spa.2020.08.002Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. Wang and B. Wang, Random dynamics of lattice wave equations driven by infinite-dimensional nonlinear noise, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 25 (2020), no. 7, 2461–2493, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2020019. 10.3934/dcdsb.2020019Search in Google Scholar

[26] X. Wang, P. E. Kloeden, and X. Han, Stochastic dynamics of a neural field lattice model with state dependent nonlinear noise, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 28 (2021), 43, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-021-00705-8. 10.1007/s00030-021-00705-8Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. Yang and Y. Li, Dynamics and invariant measures of multi-stochastic sine-Gordon lattices with random viscosity and nonlinear noise, J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021), 051510, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037929. 10.1063/5.0037929Search in Google Scholar

[28] Y. Yang, J. Shu, and X. Wang, Wong-Zakai approximations and random attractors of non-autonomous stochastic discrete complex Ginzburg-Landau equations, J. Math. Phys. 62 (2021), 062701, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0016914. 10.1063/5.0016914Search in Google Scholar

[29] C. Zhao and S. Zhou, Limit behavior of global attractors for the complex Ginzburg-Landau equation on infinite lattices, Appl. Math. Lett. 21 (2008), no. 6, 628–635, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2007.07.016. 10.1016/j.aml.2007.07.016Search in Google Scholar

[30] Y. Chen, X. Wang, and K. Wu, Wong-Zakai approximations and pathwise dynamics of stochastic fractional lattice systems, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 21 (2022), no. 8, 2529–2560, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2022059. 10.3934/cpaa.2022059Search in Google Scholar

[31] Y. Chen and X. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous fractional stochastic lattice systems with multiplicative noise, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 27 (2022), no. 9, 5205–5224, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2021271. 10.3934/dcdsb.2021271Search in Google Scholar

[32] Ó Ciaurri, T. A. Gillespie, L. Roncal, J. L. Torrea, and J. L. Varona, Harmonic analysis associated with a discrete Laplacian, J. Anal. Math. 132 (2017), 109–131, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11854-017-0015-6. 10.1007/s11854-017-0015-6Search in Google Scholar

[33] Ó Ciaurri, C. Lizama, L. Roncal, and J. L. Varona, On a connection between the discrete fractional Laplacian and superdiffusion, Appl. Math. Lett. 49 (2015), 119–125, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2015.05.007. 10.1016/j.aml.2015.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[34] Ó Ciaurri and L. Roncal, Hardy’s inequality for the fractional powers of a discrete Laplacian, J. Anal. 26 (2018), 211–225, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41478-018-0141-2. 10.1007/s41478-018-0141-2Search in Google Scholar

[35] Ó Ciaurri, L. Roncal, P. R. Stinga, J. L. Torrea, and J. L. Varona, Varona, Nonlocal discrete diffusion equations and the fractional discrete Laplacian, regularity and applications, Adv. Math. 330 (2018), 688–738, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2018.03.023. 10.1016/j.aim.2018.03.023Search in Google Scholar

[36] C. Lizama and L. Roncal, Hölder-Lebesgue regularity and almost periodicity for semidiscrete equations with a fractional Laplacian, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 38 (2018), no. 3, 1365–1403, DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2018056. 10.3934/dcds.2018056Search in Google Scholar

[37] P. R. Stinga and J. L. Torrea, Extension problem and Harnackas inequality for some fractional operators, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 35 (2010), no. 11, 2092–2122, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03605301003735680. 10.1080/03605301003735680Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-12-28
Revised: 2024-05-13
Accepted: 2024-05-16
Published Online: 2024-08-08

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Issue on Contemporary Developments in Graph Topological Indices
  2. On the maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of graphs
  3. Upper bounds for the global cyclicity index
  4. Zagreb connection indices on polyomino chains and random polyomino chains
  5. On the multiplicative sum Zagreb index of molecular graphs
  6. The minimum matching energy of unicyclic graphs with fixed number of vertices of degree two
  7. Special Issue on Convex Analysis and Applications - Part I
  8. Weighted Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities without any symmetry condition on the weight function
  9. Scattering threshold for the focusing energy-critical generalized Hartree equation
  10. (pq)-Compactness in spaces of holomorphic mappings
  11. Characterizations of minimal elements of upper support with applications in minimizing DC functions
  12. Some new Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for strongly h-convex functions on co-ordinates
  13. Global existence and extinction for a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void
  14. Extension of Fejér's inequality to the class of sub-biharmonic functions
  15. On sup- and inf-attaining functionals
  16. Regularization method and a posteriori error estimates for the two membranes problem
  17. Rapid Communication
  18. Note on quasivarieties generated by finite pointed abelian groups
  19. Review Articles
  20. Amitsur's theorem, semicentral idempotents, and additively idempotent semirings
  21. A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs
  22. On an Oberbeck-Boussinesq model relating to the motion of a viscous fluid subject to heating
  23. Pullback and uniform exponential attractors for non-autonomous Oregonator systems
  24. Regular Articles
  25. On certain functional equation related to derivations
  26. The product of a quartic and a sextic number cannot be octic
  27. Combined system of additive functional equations in Banach algebras
  28. Enhanced Young-type inequalities utilizing Kantorovich approach for semidefinite matrices
  29. Local and global solvability for the Boussinesq system in Besov spaces
  30. Construction of 4 x 4 symmetric stochastic matrices with given spectra
  31. A conjecture of Mallows and Sloane with the universal denominator of Hilbert series
  32. The uniqueness of expression for generalized quadratic matrices
  33. On the generalized exponential sums and their fourth power mean
  34. Infinitely many solutions for Schrödinger equations with Hardy potential and Berestycki-Lions conditions
  35. Computing the determinant of a signed graph
  36. Two results on the value distribution of meromorphic functions
  37. Zariski topology on the secondary-like spectrum of a module
  38. On deferred f-statistical convergence for double sequences
  39. About j-Noetherian rings
  40. Strong convergence for weighted sums of (α, β)-mixing random variables and application to simple linear EV regression model
  41. On the distribution of powered numbers
  42. Almost periodic dynamics for a delayed differential neoclassical growth model with discontinuous control strategy
  43. A new distributionally robust reward-risk model for portfolio optimization
  44. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a viscoelastic Shear beam model with no rotary inertia: General and optimal decay results
  45. Silting modules over a class of Morita rings
  46. Non-oscillation of linear differential equations with coefficients containing powers of natural logarithm
  47. Mutually unbiased bases via complex projective trigonometry
  48. Hyers-Ulam stability of a nonlinear partial integro-differential equation of order three
  49. On second-order linear Stieltjes differential equations with non-constant coefficients
  50. Complex dynamics of a nonlinear discrete predator-prey system with Allee effect
  51. The fibering method approach for a Schrödinger-Poisson system with p-Laplacian in bounded domains
  52. On discrete inequalities for some classes of sequences
  53. Boundary value problems for integro-differential and singular higher-order differential equations
  54. Existence and properties of soliton solution for the quasilinear Schrödinger system
  55. Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic ρ-convex functions in two dimension
  56. Endpoint boundedness of toroidal pseudo-differential operators
  57. Matrix stretching
  58. A singular perturbation result for a class of periodic-parabolic BVPs
  59. On Laguerre-Sobolev matrix orthogonal polynomials
  60. Pullback attractors for fractional lattice systems with delays in weighted space
  61. Singularities of spherical surface in R4
  62. Variational approach to Kirchhoff-type second-order impulsive differential systems
  63. Convergence rate of the truncated Euler-Maruyama method for highly nonlinear neutral stochastic differential equations with time-dependent delay
  64. On the energy decay of a coupled nonlinear suspension bridge problem with nonlinear feedback
  65. The limit theorems on extreme order statistics and partial sums of i.i.d. random variables
  66. Hardy-type inequalities for a class of iterated operators and their application to Morrey-type spaces
  67. Solving multi-point problem for Volterra-Fredholm integro-differential equations using Dzhumabaev parameterization method
  68. Finite groups with gcd(χ(1), χc (1)) a prime
  69. Small values and functional laws of the iterated logarithm for operator fractional Brownian motion
  70. The hull-kernel topology on prime ideals in ordered semigroups
  71. ℐ-sn-metrizable spaces and the images of semi-metric spaces
  72. Strong laws for weighted sums of widely orthant dependent random variables and applications
  73. An extension of Schweitzer's inequality to Riemann-Liouville fractional integral
  74. Construction of a class of half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities in the whole plane
  75. Analysis of two-grid method for second-order hyperbolic equation by expanded mixed finite element methods
  76. Note on stability estimation of stochastic difference equations
  77. Trigonometric integrals evaluated in terms of Riemann zeta and Dirichlet beta functions
  78. Purity and hybridness of two tensors on a real hypersurface in complex projective space
  79. Classification of positive solutions for a weighted integral system on the half-space
  80. A quasi-reversibility method for solving nonhomogeneous sideways heat equation
  81. Higher-order nonlocal multipoint q-integral boundary value problems for fractional q-difference equations with dual hybrid terms
  82. Noetherian rings of composite generalized power series
  83. On generalized shifts of the Mellin transform of the Riemann zeta-function
  84. Further results on enumeration of perfect matchings of Cartesian product graphs
  85. A new extended Mulholland's inequality involving one partial sum
  86. Power vector inequalities for operator pairs in Hilbert spaces and their applications
  87. On the common zeros of quasi-modular forms for Γ+0(N) of level N = 1, 2, 3
  88. One special kind of Kloosterman sum and its fourth-power mean
  89. The stability of high ring homomorphisms and derivations on fuzzy Banach algebras
  90. Integral mean estimates of Turán-type inequalities for the polar derivative of a polynomial with restricted zeros
  91. Commutators of multilinear fractional maximal operators with Lipschitz functions on Morrey spaces
  92. Vector optimization problems with weakened convex and weakened affine constraints in linear topological spaces
  93. The curvature entropy inequalities of convex bodies
  94. Brouwer's conjecture for the sum of the k largest Laplacian eigenvalues of some graphs
  95. High-order finite-difference ghost-point methods for elliptic problems in domains with curved boundaries
  96. Riemannian invariants for warped product submanifolds in Q ε m × R and their applications
  97. Generalized quadratic Gauss sums and their 2mth power mean
  98. Euler-α equations in a three-dimensional bounded domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions
  99. Enochs conjecture for cotorsion pairs over recollements of exact categories
  100. Zeros distribution and interlacing property for certain polynomial sequences
  101. Random attractors of Kirchhoff-type reaction–diffusion equations without uniqueness driven by nonlinear colored noise
  102. Study on solutions of the systems of complex product-type PDEs with more general forms in ℂ2
  103. Dynamics in a predator-prey model with predation-driven Allee effect and memory effect
  104. A note on orthogonal decomposition of 𝔰𝔩n over commutative rings
  105. On the δ-chromatic numbers of the Cartesian products of graphs
  106. Binomial convolution sum of divisor functions associated with Dirichlet character modulo 8
  107. Commutator of fractional integral with Lipschitz functions related to Schrödinger operator on local generalized mixed Morrey spaces
  108. System of degenerate parabolic p-Laplacian
  109. Stochastic stability and instability of rumor model
  110. Certain properties and characterizations of a novel family of bivariate 2D-q Hermite polynomials
  111. Stability of an additive-quadratic functional equation in modular spaces
  112. Monotonicity, convexity, and Maclaurin series expansion of Qi's normalized remainder of Maclaurin series expansion with relation to cosine
  113. On k-prime graphs
  114. On the existence of tripartite graphs and n-partite graphs
  115. Classifying pentavalent symmetric graphs of order 12pq
  116. Almost periodic functions on time scales and their properties
  117. Some results on uniqueness and higher order difference equations
  118. Coding of hypersurfaces in Euclidean spaces by a constant vector
  119. Cycle integrals and rational period functions for Γ0+(2) and Γ0+(3)
  120. Degrees of (L, M)-fuzzy bornologies
  121. A matrix approach to determine optimal predictors in a constrained linear mixed model
  122. On ideals of affine semigroups and affine semigroups with maximal embedding dimension
  123. Solutions of linear control systems on Lie groups
  124. A uniqueness result for the fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with strong singularity
  125. On prime spaces of neutrosophic extended triplet groups
  126. On a generalized Krasnoselskii fixed point theorem
  127. On the relation between one-sided duoness and commutators
  128. Non-homogeneous BVPs for second-order symmetric Hamiltonian systems
  129. Erratum
  130. Erratum to “Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence”
  131. Corrigendum
  132. Corrigendum to “Matrix stretching”
  133. Corrigendum to “A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs”
Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2024-0026/html
Scroll to top button