Home Two results on the value distribution of meromorphic functions
Article Open Access

Two results on the value distribution of meromorphic functions

  • Degui Yang , Zhiying He and Dan Liu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 5, 2024

Abstract

In this article, we prove two results on the value distribution of meromorphic functions. Using the theorem of Yamanoi, the first result gives a precise estimation of the relationship between the characteristic function of a meromorphic function and its k th derivative in a concise form. This result extends and improves some results of Shan, Singh, Gopalakrishna, Edrei, Weitsman, Yang, Wu and Wu, etc. The second result answers a conjecture posed by C. C. Yang. This conjecture turned to be false by a counter-example, but it will be true with an additional condition.

MSC 2010: 30D35

1 Introduction and main results

In this article, we assume that the reader is familiar with the basic notions of Nevanlinna’s value distribution theory [13]. In the following, a meromorphic function always means meromorphic in the whole complex plane. By S ( r , f ) , we denote any quantity satisfying S ( r , f ) = o ( T ( r , f ) ) as r possible outside of an exceptional set E with finite measure.

Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function. The order of f is defined by

ρ ( f ) = lim ¯ r log + T ( r , f ) log r .

Let a be a complex number (finite or infinite). According to R. Nevanlinna

δ ( a , f ) = lim ̲ r m r , 1 f a T ( r , f ) = 1 lim ¯ r N r , 1 f a T ( r , f ) ,

Θ ( a , f ) = 1 lim ¯ r N ¯ r , 1 f a T ( r , f ) .

It is clear that 0 δ ( a , f ) 1 (or 0 Θ ( a , f ) 1 ). If δ ( a , f ) > 0 (or Θ ( a , f ) > 0 ), then a is called a deficient value with respect to f and δ ( a , f ) (or Θ ( a , f ) ) is its deficiency. The most fundamental result of Nevanlinna theory can be stated as follows.

Any transcendental meromorphic function f in the finite plane has countable deficient values at most and the total deficiency does not exceed 2, i.e.,

a C ˆ δ ( a , f ) a C ˆ Θ ( a , f ) 2 , where C ˆ = C { } .

It is the famous Defect Relation (or Deficient Relation). In the general case, the upper bound 2 is sharp. If a C ˆ δ ( a , f ) = 2 or a C ˆ Θ ( a , f ) = 2 , then we say that f has maximum deficiency sum.

Let f be a meromorphic function in C . The characteristic function of derivative of f with maximum deficiency sum was studied by Shan, Singh, Gopalakrishna, Edrei, and Weitsman (see [410]). Edrei [4] and Weitsman [8] proved the following.

Theorem A

Let f be a transcendental meromorphic function of finite order and satisfying a C δ ( a , f ) + δ ( , f ) = 2 . Then

lim r T ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) = 2 δ ( , f ) .

Yang [10] considered the case of higher order derivatives and proved the following.

Theorem B

Let k be a positive integer, and let f be a transcendental meromorphic function of finite order and satisfying a C δ ( a , f ) + δ ( , f ) = 2 . Then

lim r T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) = 1 , f o r δ ( , f ) = 1 ; lim r T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) = k + 1 , f o r δ ( , f ) = 0 .

If a C δ ( a , f ) + δ ( , f ) = 2 is replaced by a C Θ ( a , f ) + Θ ( , f ) = 2 , Singh-Gopalakrishna [6] and Singh-Kulkarni [7] proved the following.

Theorem C

Let f be a transcendental meromorphic function of finite order and satisfying a C Θ ( a , f ) + Θ ( , f ) = 2 . Then

lim r T ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) = 2 Θ ( , f ) .

Wu and Wu [9] considered the case of higher order derivatives and proved the following.

Theorem D

Let k be a positive integer, and let f be a transcendental meromorphic function of finite order and satisfying a C Θ ( a , f ) + Θ ( , f ) = 2 . Then

lim r T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) = 1 , f o r Θ ( , f ) = 1 ; lim r T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) = k + 1 , f o r Θ ( , f ) = 0 .

Remark 1

There exists a gap in the proof of Theorem D (at page 1120 from line 3 to line 4).

In this article, we extend and improve the aforementioned results and obtain the following result.

Theorem 1

Let k be a positive integer, and let f be a transcendental meromorphic function of finite order and satisfying a C Θ ( a , f ) + Θ ( , f ) = 2 . Then

lim r , r E T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) = k + 1 k Θ ( , f ) ,

where E is a set of logarithmic density 0.

From Theorem 1, we obtain

Corollary 2

Let k be a positive integer, and let f be a transcendental meromorphic function of finite order and satisfying a C δ ( a , f ) + δ ( , f ) = 2 . Then

lim r , r E T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) = k + 1 k δ ( , f ) ,

where E is a set of logarithmic density 0.

In 1959, Hayman proved the following result about value distribution of meromorphic function.

Theorem E

[11] Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function in C , a , b ( 0 ) be finite values, and k be a positive integer. Then either f = a or f ( k ) = b has at least one root. Moreover, if f is transcendental, then either f = a or f ( k ) = b has infinitely many zeros.

In 2004, Yang proved the following theorem.

Theorem F

[12] Let f be a transcendental meromorphic function satisfying

N ( r , 1 f ) = S ( r , f ) ,

where S ( r , f ) denotes any quantity that satisfy S ( r , f ) = o ( 1 ) T ( r , f ) as r + , except a set of finite linear length. Then, for any n 1 and any small function b ( z ) ( 0 ) of f ,

N r , 1 f ( n ) b S ( r , f ) .

In the same article, Yang posed a conjecture as follows.

Conjecture

[12] If α is a nonconstant entire function, and z 0 is an arbitrary point in C , then F ( z ) = z 0 z e α ( z ) d z must have infinitely many zeros.

In this article, we will give a counter-example to show that the conjecture is not true.

Example

Let α ( z ) = z + 0 z e z 1 z d z , F ( z ) = 0 z e α ( z ) d z , and let G ( z ) = z e 0 z e z 1 z d z . It is easy to prove that α ( z ) is an entire function, and

F ( z ) = e α ( z ) = e z + 0 z e z 1 z d z ,

G ( z ) = e 0 z e z 1 z d z + z e 0 z e z 1 z d z e z 1 z = e z + 0 z e z 1 z d z .

Therefore, F ( z ) = G ( z ) , which means F ( z ) = G ( z ) + C , and C is a constant. Since F ( 0 ) = G ( 0 ) = 0 , we have C = 0 . It follows that F ( z ) = G ( z ) .

For z = 0 is the only zero of G ( z ) , we can deduce that F ( z ) has only one zero.

This example shows that it could be possible for functions of the form 0 z e α ( z ) d z have only finitely many zeros. Thus, the conjecture of C. C. Yang is not true. But this conjecture will be correct if α ( z ) has finitely number of zeros. In fact, we have proved the following result.

Theorem 3

Let α ( z ) be an entire function, and α ( z ) has finitely many zeros, then F ( z ) = 0 z e α ( z ) d z has infinitely many zeros.

By Theorem 3, we naturally have the following corollary.

Corollary 4

Let α ( z ) be a nonconstant polynomial, then F ( z ) = 0 z e α ( z ) d z has infinitely many zeros.

2 Some lemmas

For the proof of our results, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 1

[1,3] Let f be a nonconstant meromorphic function, and let k be a positive integer. Then

m r , f ( k ) f = S ( r , f ) .

Lemma 2

[13] Let a 1 , a 2 , , a q be distinct finite complex numbers, where q 2 ; let f be a transcendental meromorphic function in the complex plane; and let k 2 be an integer and ε > 0 . Then

(2.1) ( k 1 ) N ¯ ( r , f ) + i = 1 q N 1 r , 1 f a i N r , 1 f ( k ) + ε T ( r , f ) ,

for all r > e outside a set E ( e , ) of logarithmic density 0. Here E depends on f , k , ε , and

N 1 r , 1 f a i = N r , 1 f a i N ¯ r , 1 f a i , i = 1 , 2 , , q .

Lemma 3

[1, p. 33, (2.1)] Suppose that f ( z ) is a nonconstant meromorphic function in z r . Let a 1 , a 2 , , a q be distinct finite complex numbers, where q 2 . Then

i = 1 q m r , 1 f a i m r , i = 1 q 1 f a i + O ( 1 ) .

Lemma 4

Let f be a transcendental meromorphic function in the complex plane, and let k be an integer. Then

T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) + k N ¯ ( r , f ) + S ( r , f ) .

Proof

By Nevanlinna’s first fundamental theorem and Lemma 1, we have

T ( r , f ( k ) ) = m ( r , f ( k ) ) + N ( r , f ( k ) ) m ( r , f ) + m r , f ( k ) f + N ( r , f ) + k N ¯ ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) + k N ¯ ( r , f ) + S ( r , f ) .

Lemma 5

[14] Let the function f be meromorphic in C . If f ( m ) and f ( n ) have finitely many zeros, where 0 m n 2 , then f has finitely many poles and finite order, i.e.,

ρ ( f ) = lim ¯ r log T ( r , f ) log r < ,

and f ( m ) = Re P with R a rational function and P a polynomial.

By Lemma 5, we naturally have the following result.

Lemma 6

Let f be a meromorphic function in C . If f and f both have finitely many zeros, then

ρ ( f ) = lim ¯ r log T ( r , f ) log r < ,

which means f is a meromorphic function of finite order.

Lemma 7

Let α ( z ) be a nonconstant polynomial, then F ( z ) = 0 z e α ( z ) d z must have infinitely many zeros.

Proof

We will prove this lemma by contradiction. Suppose that F ( z ) has finite number of zeros, by Hadamard Fractional Theorem,

F ( z ) = p ( z ) e β ( z ) ,

where p ( z ) is a polynomial, and β ( z ) is a nonconstant polynomial.

Therefore,

F ( z ) = e α ( z ) = p ( z ) e β ( z ) + p ( z ) β ( z ) e β ( z ) = ( p ( z ) + p ( z ) β ( z ) ) e β ( z ) .

Hence,

p ( z ) + p ( z ) β ( z ) = e α ( z ) β ( z ) .

Comparing the order of both sides of the above equation, we have α ( z ) β ( z ) = c and p ( z ) + p ( z ) β ( z ) = e c . Thus, p ( z ) is a constant, and α ( z ) , β ( z ) are polynomials of degree 1.

Assume that α ( z ) = a z + b , where a ( 0 ) , b are constants. Then

F ( z ) = 0 z e a z + b d z = 1 a ( e a z + b e b ) .

It is obvious that F ( z ) has infinite number of zeros since e b is a nonzero constant, which is a contradiction.

Thus, Lemma 7 is proved.□

3 Proof of Theorem 1

Firstly, we prove that

(3.1) lim r N ¯ ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) = 1 Θ ( , f ) .

Without loss of generality, we assume that f has infinitely many finite deficient values a 1 , a 2 , , a n , . It follows from Lemma 1, Lemma 3, Lemma 4, and Nevanlinna’s first fundamental theorem that for every n N ,

(3.2) i = 1 n m r , 1 f a i m r , i = 1 n 1 f a i + O ( 1 ) m r , i = 1 n f f a i + m r , 1 f + S ( r , f ) = T ( r , f ) N r , 1 f + S ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) + N ¯ ( r , f ) N r , 1 f + S ( r , f ) .

Hence by Nevanlinna’s first fundamental theorem, we obtain

(3.3) n T ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) + N ¯ ( r , f ) + i = 1 n N r , 1 f a i N r , 1 f + S ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) + N ¯ ( r , f ) + i = 1 n N ¯ r , 1 f a i + S ( r , f ) .

Thus, we have

n 1 N ¯ ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) + i = 1 n N ¯ r , 1 f a i T ( r , f ) + S ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) .

It follows that

n 1 lim ̲ r N ¯ ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) + i = 1 n lim ¯ r N ¯ r , 1 f a i T ( r , f ) + lim ¯ r S ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) .

Thus, we have

(3.4) i = 1 n Θ ( a i , f ) 1 + lim ̲ r N ¯ ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) 1 + lim r ¯ N ¯ ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) = 2 Θ ( , f ) .

By the condition of the theorem, we have

(3.5) i = 1 Θ ( a i , f ) = 2 Θ ( , f ) .

Let n in (3.4), and by (3.5) we obtain (3.1).

By Lemma 1, Lemma 3, and Nevanlinna’s first fundamental theorem, we obtain

(3.6) i = 1 n m r , 1 f a i m r , 1 f ( k ) + S ( r , f ) T ( r , f ( k ) ) N r , 1 f ( k ) + S ( r , f ) .

It follows from (3.6), Lemma 2, and Nevanlinna’s first fundamental theorem that

(3.7) n T ( r , f ) i = 1 n N r , 1 f a i + T ( r , f ( k ) ) N r , 1 f ( k ) + S ( r , f ) = i = 1 n N ¯ r , 1 f a i + T ( r , f ( k ) ) + i = 1 n N r , 1 f a i N ¯ r , 1 f a i N r , 1 f ( k ) + S ( r , f ) i = 1 n N ¯ r , 1 f a i + T ( r , f ( k ) ) ( k 1 ) N ¯ ( r , f ) + ε T ( r , f ) + S ( r , f ) ,

for all r > e outside of a set E ( e , + ) of logarithmic density 0.

Thus, we obtain

(3.8) n i = 1 n N ¯ r , 1 f a i T ( r , f ) + T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) ( k 1 ) N ¯ ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) + ε + S ( r , f ) T ( r , f ) .

It follows from (3.1) and (3.8) that

(3.9) i = 1 n Θ ( a i , f ) lim ̲ r , r E T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) + ( 1 k ) ( 1 Θ ( , f ) ) + ε ,

where E is a set of logarithmic density 0.

Let n , ε 0 in (3.9), we obtain

(3.10) lim ̲ r , r E T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) 1 + k k Θ ( , f ) ,

where E is a set of logarithmic density 0.

On the other hand, by Lemma 4, we obtain

T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) + k N ¯ ( r , f ) + S ( r , f ) .

It follows that

(3.11) lim ¯ r T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) 1 + k k Θ ( , f ) .

Thus by (3.10) and (3.11), we obtain

lim r , r E T ( r , f ( k ) ) T ( r , f ) = 1 + k k Θ ( , f ) ,

where E is a set of logarithmic density 0.

Thus, Theorem 1 is proved.

4 Proof of Theorem 3

Suppose that F ( z ) has finitely many zeros. Obviously,

F ( z ) = ( F ( z ) ) = ( e α ( z ) ) = α ( z ) e α ( z ) .

It is easy to see that F ( z ) has finitely many zeros since α ( z ) has finitely zeros. By Lemma 6, F ( z ) is a function of finite order. Hence, α ( z ) is a polynomial. By Lemma 7, F ( z ) has infinitely many zeros, which leads to a contradiction to our assumption.

Therefore, F ( z ) has infinitely many zeros. Thus, Theorem 3 is proved.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their careful review and valuable suggestions.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No 12171127) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant No LY21A010012).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflicts of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

[1] W. K. Hayman, Meromorphic Functions, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1964. Search in Google Scholar

[2] I. Laine, Nevanlinna Theory and Complex Differential Equations, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993. 10.1515/9783110863147Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Yang, Value Distribution Theory, Springer, Berlin, 1993. Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Edrei, Sums of deficiencies of meromorphic functions II, J. Anal. Math. 19 (1967), 53–74. 10.1007/BF02788709Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. L. Fang, A note on a result of Singh and Kulkarni, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 23 (2000), 285–288. 10.1155/S016117120000082XSearch in Google Scholar

[6] S. K. Singh and H. S. Gopalakrishna, Exceptional values of entire and meromorphic functions, Math. Ann. 191 (1971), 121–142. 10.1007/BF02330565Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. K. Singh and V. N. Kulkarni, Characteristic function of a meromorphic function and its derivative, Ann. Polon. Math. 28 (1973), 123–133. 10.4064/ap-28-2-123-133Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Weitsman, Meromorphic functions with maximal deficiency sum and a conjecture of F. Nevanlinna, Acta Math. 123 (1969), 115–139. 10.1007/BF02392387Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Wu and Z. J. Wu, Characteristic function of a meromorphic function and its derivatives, Bull. Iranian Math. Soc. 39 (2013), no. 6, 1117–1123. Search in Google Scholar

[10] L. Z. Yang, Sum of deficiencies of meromorphic function and its characteristic function, J. Shandong Univ. Nat. Sci. 24 (1989), 7–11. Search in Google Scholar

[11] W. K. Hayman, Picard values of meromorphic functions and their derivatives, Ann. Math. 70 (1959), no. 1, 9–42. 10.2307/1969890Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. C. Yang, On the value distribution of a transcendental meromorphic function and its derivatives, Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 35 (2004), no. 8, 1027–1031. Search in Google Scholar

[13] K. Yamanoi, Zeros of higher derivatives of meromorphic functions in the complex plane, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 106 (2013), no. 4, 703–780. 10.1112/plms/pds051Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. Langley, Zeros of derivatives of meromorphic functions, Comput. Methods Funct. Theory 10 (2010), no. 2. 421–439. 10.1007/BF03321774Search in Google Scholar

[15] G. Frank and G. Weissenborn, Rational deficient functions of meromorphic functions, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 18 (1986), no. 1, 29–33. 10.1112/blms/18.1.29Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-21
Revised: 2023-12-12
Accepted: 2024-03-07
Published Online: 2024-04-05

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Issue on Contemporary Developments in Graph Topological Indices
  2. On the maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of graphs
  3. Upper bounds for the global cyclicity index
  4. Zagreb connection indices on polyomino chains and random polyomino chains
  5. On the multiplicative sum Zagreb index of molecular graphs
  6. The minimum matching energy of unicyclic graphs with fixed number of vertices of degree two
  7. Special Issue on Convex Analysis and Applications - Part I
  8. Weighted Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities without any symmetry condition on the weight function
  9. Scattering threshold for the focusing energy-critical generalized Hartree equation
  10. (pq)-Compactness in spaces of holomorphic mappings
  11. Characterizations of minimal elements of upper support with applications in minimizing DC functions
  12. Some new Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for strongly h-convex functions on co-ordinates
  13. Global existence and extinction for a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void
  14. Extension of Fejér's inequality to the class of sub-biharmonic functions
  15. On sup- and inf-attaining functionals
  16. Regularization method and a posteriori error estimates for the two membranes problem
  17. Rapid Communication
  18. Note on quasivarieties generated by finite pointed abelian groups
  19. Review Articles
  20. Amitsur's theorem, semicentral idempotents, and additively idempotent semirings
  21. A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs
  22. On an Oberbeck-Boussinesq model relating to the motion of a viscous fluid subject to heating
  23. Pullback and uniform exponential attractors for non-autonomous Oregonator systems
  24. Regular Articles
  25. On certain functional equation related to derivations
  26. The product of a quartic and a sextic number cannot be octic
  27. Combined system of additive functional equations in Banach algebras
  28. Enhanced Young-type inequalities utilizing Kantorovich approach for semidefinite matrices
  29. Local and global solvability for the Boussinesq system in Besov spaces
  30. Construction of 4 x 4 symmetric stochastic matrices with given spectra
  31. A conjecture of Mallows and Sloane with the universal denominator of Hilbert series
  32. The uniqueness of expression for generalized quadratic matrices
  33. On the generalized exponential sums and their fourth power mean
  34. Infinitely many solutions for Schrödinger equations with Hardy potential and Berestycki-Lions conditions
  35. Computing the determinant of a signed graph
  36. Two results on the value distribution of meromorphic functions
  37. Zariski topology on the secondary-like spectrum of a module
  38. On deferred f-statistical convergence for double sequences
  39. About j-Noetherian rings
  40. Strong convergence for weighted sums of (α, β)-mixing random variables and application to simple linear EV regression model
  41. On the distribution of powered numbers
  42. Almost periodic dynamics for a delayed differential neoclassical growth model with discontinuous control strategy
  43. A new distributionally robust reward-risk model for portfolio optimization
  44. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a viscoelastic Shear beam model with no rotary inertia: General and optimal decay results
  45. Silting modules over a class of Morita rings
  46. Non-oscillation of linear differential equations with coefficients containing powers of natural logarithm
  47. Mutually unbiased bases via complex projective trigonometry
  48. Hyers-Ulam stability of a nonlinear partial integro-differential equation of order three
  49. On second-order linear Stieltjes differential equations with non-constant coefficients
  50. Complex dynamics of a nonlinear discrete predator-prey system with Allee effect
  51. The fibering method approach for a Schrödinger-Poisson system with p-Laplacian in bounded domains
  52. On discrete inequalities for some classes of sequences
  53. Boundary value problems for integro-differential and singular higher-order differential equations
  54. Existence and properties of soliton solution for the quasilinear Schrödinger system
  55. Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic ρ-convex functions in two dimension
  56. Endpoint boundedness of toroidal pseudo-differential operators
  57. Matrix stretching
  58. A singular perturbation result for a class of periodic-parabolic BVPs
  59. On Laguerre-Sobolev matrix orthogonal polynomials
  60. Pullback attractors for fractional lattice systems with delays in weighted space
  61. Singularities of spherical surface in R4
  62. Variational approach to Kirchhoff-type second-order impulsive differential systems
  63. Convergence rate of the truncated Euler-Maruyama method for highly nonlinear neutral stochastic differential equations with time-dependent delay
  64. On the energy decay of a coupled nonlinear suspension bridge problem with nonlinear feedback
  65. The limit theorems on extreme order statistics and partial sums of i.i.d. random variables
  66. Hardy-type inequalities for a class of iterated operators and their application to Morrey-type spaces
  67. Solving multi-point problem for Volterra-Fredholm integro-differential equations using Dzhumabaev parameterization method
  68. Finite groups with gcd(χ(1), χc (1)) a prime
  69. Small values and functional laws of the iterated logarithm for operator fractional Brownian motion
  70. The hull-kernel topology on prime ideals in ordered semigroups
  71. ℐ-sn-metrizable spaces and the images of semi-metric spaces
  72. Strong laws for weighted sums of widely orthant dependent random variables and applications
  73. An extension of Schweitzer's inequality to Riemann-Liouville fractional integral
  74. Construction of a class of half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities in the whole plane
  75. Analysis of two-grid method for second-order hyperbolic equation by expanded mixed finite element methods
  76. Note on stability estimation of stochastic difference equations
  77. Trigonometric integrals evaluated in terms of Riemann zeta and Dirichlet beta functions
  78. Purity and hybridness of two tensors on a real hypersurface in complex projective space
  79. Classification of positive solutions for a weighted integral system on the half-space
  80. A quasi-reversibility method for solving nonhomogeneous sideways heat equation
  81. Higher-order nonlocal multipoint q-integral boundary value problems for fractional q-difference equations with dual hybrid terms
  82. Noetherian rings of composite generalized power series
  83. On generalized shifts of the Mellin transform of the Riemann zeta-function
  84. Further results on enumeration of perfect matchings of Cartesian product graphs
  85. A new extended Mulholland's inequality involving one partial sum
  86. Power vector inequalities for operator pairs in Hilbert spaces and their applications
  87. On the common zeros of quasi-modular forms for Γ+0(N) of level N = 1, 2, 3
  88. One special kind of Kloosterman sum and its fourth-power mean
  89. The stability of high ring homomorphisms and derivations on fuzzy Banach algebras
  90. Integral mean estimates of Turán-type inequalities for the polar derivative of a polynomial with restricted zeros
  91. Commutators of multilinear fractional maximal operators with Lipschitz functions on Morrey spaces
  92. Vector optimization problems with weakened convex and weakened affine constraints in linear topological spaces
  93. The curvature entropy inequalities of convex bodies
  94. Brouwer's conjecture for the sum of the k largest Laplacian eigenvalues of some graphs
  95. High-order finite-difference ghost-point methods for elliptic problems in domains with curved boundaries
  96. Riemannian invariants for warped product submanifolds in Q ε m × R and their applications
  97. Generalized quadratic Gauss sums and their 2mth power mean
  98. Euler-α equations in a three-dimensional bounded domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions
  99. Enochs conjecture for cotorsion pairs over recollements of exact categories
  100. Zeros distribution and interlacing property for certain polynomial sequences
  101. Random attractors of Kirchhoff-type reaction–diffusion equations without uniqueness driven by nonlinear colored noise
  102. Study on solutions of the systems of complex product-type PDEs with more general forms in ℂ2
  103. Dynamics in a predator-prey model with predation-driven Allee effect and memory effect
  104. A note on orthogonal decomposition of 𝔰𝔩n over commutative rings
  105. On the δ-chromatic numbers of the Cartesian products of graphs
  106. Binomial convolution sum of divisor functions associated with Dirichlet character modulo 8
  107. Commutator of fractional integral with Lipschitz functions related to Schrödinger operator on local generalized mixed Morrey spaces
  108. System of degenerate parabolic p-Laplacian
  109. Stochastic stability and instability of rumor model
  110. Certain properties and characterizations of a novel family of bivariate 2D-q Hermite polynomials
  111. Stability of an additive-quadratic functional equation in modular spaces
  112. Monotonicity, convexity, and Maclaurin series expansion of Qi's normalized remainder of Maclaurin series expansion with relation to cosine
  113. On k-prime graphs
  114. On the existence of tripartite graphs and n-partite graphs
  115. Classifying pentavalent symmetric graphs of order 12pq
  116. Almost periodic functions on time scales and their properties
  117. Some results on uniqueness and higher order difference equations
  118. Coding of hypersurfaces in Euclidean spaces by a constant vector
  119. Cycle integrals and rational period functions for Γ0+(2) and Γ0+(3)
  120. Degrees of (L, M)-fuzzy bornologies
  121. A matrix approach to determine optimal predictors in a constrained linear mixed model
  122. On ideals of affine semigroups and affine semigroups with maximal embedding dimension
  123. Solutions of linear control systems on Lie groups
  124. A uniqueness result for the fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with strong singularity
  125. On prime spaces of neutrosophic extended triplet groups
  126. On a generalized Krasnoselskii fixed point theorem
  127. On the relation between one-sided duoness and commutators
  128. Non-homogeneous BVPs for second-order symmetric Hamiltonian systems
  129. Erratum
  130. Erratum to “Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence”
  131. Corrigendum
  132. Corrigendum to “Matrix stretching”
  133. Corrigendum to “A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs”
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2024-0004/html
Scroll to top button