Home Mathematics Global existence and extinction for a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void
Article Open Access

Global existence and extinction for a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void

  • Dengming Liu EMAIL logo and Qi Chen
Published/Copyright: September 24, 2024

Abstract

This article is devoted to the global existence and extinction behavior of the weak solution to a fast diffusion p -Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void. By applying energy estimates approach, Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, and some ordinary differential inequalities, the global existence result is proved and the sufficient conditions on the occurrence of the extinction and nonextinction phenomena are given.

MSC 2010: 35K20; 35K55

1 Introduction

Let Ω R N ( N 2 ) be an open bounded domain containing the coordinate origin x = 0 , with smooth boundary Ω , x = i = 1 N x i 2 for x = ( x 1 , , x N ) Ω . In this article, we take an interest in the global existence and extinction behavior of the solutions for a fast diffusion p -Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void

(1.1) x s u t div ( u p 2 u ) = f ( u ) , ( x , t ) Ω × ( 0 , + ) , u ( x , t ) = 0 , ( x , t ) Ω × ( 0 , + ) , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , x Ω ,

with

f ( u ) = u q 2 u log u , if u 0 ; 0 , if u = 0 ,

where p , q ( 1 , 2 ) , and s 0 are three parameters, and the initial datum u 0 ( x ) L ( Ω ) W 0 1 , p ( Ω ) is nontrivial. By the assumption on the parameter q , one knows that lim u 0 + f ( u ) = 0 , and hence, f ( u ) C ( R ) . From a physical point of view, problem (1.1) can be used to describe the flow of a compressible fluid in a homogeneous isotropic rigid porous medium. In this content, u ( x , t ) is the density of the fluid, x s acts as the volumetric moisture content, u p 2 u presents the momentum velocity, and f ( u ) denotes the source. The readers can refer to [1] for more details of the background of problem (1.1).

In the recent years, mathematicians have focused their attention on the parabolic models with logarithmic nonlinearities and have obtained lots of achievements [29]. In particular, Chen et al. [10] dealt with problem (1.1) with s = 0 and p = q = 2 . Under some suitable hypotheses on the initial datum, they proved the existence of the uniformly bounded global solution and the infinite time blow-up phenomenon by utilizing the potential well method and logarithmic Sobolev inequality. Le and Le [11,12] studied the existence and nonexistence of the global weak solutions of problem (1.1) with s = 0 and p , q > 2 . Exactly speaking, they concluded that if p > q , then for any u 0 ( x ) W 0 1 , p ( Ω ) , problem (1.1) admits a global solution; if p q , then there exists a weak solution of problem (1.1), which is global provided that u 0 ( x ) belongs to some specific stable sets, and blows up in finite time provided that u 0 ( x ) belongs to some specific unstable sets. Compared with the case s = 0 , there are fewer results for problem (1.1) with s 0 . Deng and Zhou [13] considered problem (1.1) with s [ 0 , 2 ) and p = q = 2 . They gave some threshold results on the global existence or infinite time blow-up of the solutions in the cases of subcritical and critical initial energies. Liao and Tan [14] generalized the results in [13] to the case 2 p < q < N p N p . Unlike the semilinear case (i.e., p = 2 ) in which the blow-up solutions blow up at t = + , Liao and Tan [14] pointed out that the blow-up solutions will blow up in finite time when p > 2 , and got the upper and lower bounds of the blow-up time.

We say that the solution u ( x , t ) of problem (1.1) possesses finite time extinction property (i.e., u ( x , t ) vanishes in finite time) if there exists a T ( 0 , + ) such that u ( x , t ) is nontrivial for t ( 0 , T ) but u ( x , t ) 0 for t > T . As one of the most remarkable properties that distinguish nonlinear parabolic problems from the linear ones, finite time extinction can be used to explain certain natural phenomena, such as, the depletion of the reactants in a chemical reaction process, the extinction of the species in biopopulation dynamics, and so on. There exist a number of works on the extinction and nonextinction properties of the weak solutions to problem (1.1) in the case of power nonlinearities and its generalization [1526], but there is a little known about the one with logarithmic nonlinearity. Very recently, Deng and Zhou [27] considered problem (1.1) with s = 0 and p , q ( 1 , 2 ) , by using integral norm estimates approach and some ordinary differential inequalities, they obtained the sufficient conditions on the extinction and nonextinction behaviors of the global weak solutions.

As far as we know, there are no results on the extinction and nonextinction of the global solutions to the parabolic model with both special medium void and logarithmic nonlinearity. How to evaluate the effects of the singular potential x s and the logarithmic nonlinearity u q 2 u log u on the occurrence of the extinction phenomenon of the global solution to problem (1.1)? The main goal of the present article is to give an answer to this question. The main results of this article are stated as follows.

Theorem 1.1

Assume that 1 < p < 2 , 1 < q < 2 , s 0 , and u 0 ( x ) L ( Ω ) W 0 1 , p ( Ω ) . Then the weak solution u ( x , t ) of problem (1.1) exists globally.

Theorem 1.2

Assume that max { 1 , s } < p < q < 2 . If the initial data u 0 ( x ) satisfies

(1.2) 2 max Ω x s u 0 + p a + 2 q + β p p a + 2 , Ω x s u 0 p a + 2 q + β p p a + 2 C 4 C 5 1

with some β ( 0 , 2 q ) , a max 1 p , 2 ( N p ) p ( N s ) p ( p s ) . Then the weak solution u ( x , t ) of problem (1.1) vanishes in finite time, where C 4 and C 5 are two positive constants given by (3.12) and (3.13), respectively.

Theorem 1.3

Assume that 1 < q p < 2 and s 0 . If

Ω x s u 0 2 d x > 0 ,

and

(1.3) E ( u 0 ) 0 , when p = q ; E ( u 0 ) < 0 , when p > q .

Then the weak solution of problem (1.1) cannot vanish in finite time, where

E ( u 0 ) = 1 p Ω u 0 p d x 1 q Ω u 0 q log u 0 d x + 1 q 2 Ω u 0 q d x .

The remainder of this article is organized as follows. In Section 2, some definitions and notations are given, and some useful auxiliary lemmas are collected. In Section 3, the global existence result is proved and the conditions on the occurrence of the extinction and nonextinction behaviors are discussed. The proofs of Theorems 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 will be given in Section 3. Finally, a conclusion of this article and the future scope of our work are provided in Section 4.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, we first introduce some notations and definitions. For a given function f , we define its positive part f + and negative part f as the forms

f + = max { f , 0 } , f = max { f , 0 } .

Then f = f + f and f = f + + f . For given p [ 1 , + ) , we introduce the Hilbert space

W 1 , p ( Ω ) = u L p ( Ω ) : u x i L p ( Ω ) , i = 1 , 2 , , N ,

endowed with the norm

u W 1 , p ( Ω ) = u L p ( Ω ) p + u L p ( Ω ) p p .

Denote

W 0 1 , p ( Ω ) = { u W 1 , p ( Ω ) : u Ω = 0 } .

Due to Poincaré’s inequality, one can know that

u L p ( Ω ) = Ω u p d x 1 p

is an equivalent norm to u W 1 , p ( Ω ) in W 0 1 , p ( Ω ) .

It is worth noting that the first equation in problem (1.1) is singular at the points where u = 0 when 1 < p < 2 , and hence, there is no classical solution in general. Throughout this article, we work with the weak solution of problem (1.1) in the sense of the following definition.

Definition 2.1

Let T > 0 . A function u = u ( x , t ) defined in Ω × ( 0 , T ) is called a weak solution of problem (1.1) if u C ( [ 0 , T ) ; W 0 1 , p ( Ω ) ) , x s 2 u t L 2 ( 0 , T ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , and for any φ W 0 1 , p ( Ω ) , it holds that

(2.1) 0 T Ω x s u t φ d x + 0 T Ω u p 2 u φ d x = 0 T Ω u q 2 u log u φ d x .

Similar to Theorem 2.3 of [14] (or Theorem 3.2 of [11]), the local existence of the weak solution of problem (1.1) can be guaranteed by the Galerkin approximation method.

Next, we collect some useful auxiliary lemmas, which play a key role in the later proofs of our main results.

Lemma 2.1

(Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, see [28]) Assume that N 2 , 1 < μ < N , 0 ϑ μ and σ = μ ( N ϑ ) N μ . Then, there exists a positive constant κ = κ ( μ , ϑ , N ) such that

(2.2) Ω u ( x ) σ x ϑ d x κ Ω u μ d x N ϑ N μ

holds for any u W 0 1 , μ ( Ω ) , where Ω R N is a bounded domain.

Lemma 2.2

(see [29]) Assume that 0 < k < p 1 . Let y ( t ) be the solution of the following inequality:

d y d t + C y k γ y p , t > 0 , y ( 0 ) = y 0 > 0 ,

with C > 0 and 0 < γ < C y 0 k p 2 . Then, there are two positive constants η and ξ such that

0 y ( t ) ξ e η t

holds for any t 0 .

Lemma 2.3

(see [30]) Assume that θ , δ , and χ are three positive constants. Let y ( t ) be a nonnegative absolutely continuous function satisfying

d y d t + δ y θ ( t ) χ , t > 0 .

Then, we have

y ( t ) min y ( 0 ) , χ δ 1 θ .

Lemma 2.4

(see [31]) Assume that σ and ρ are two positive constants. Then we have

Ψ σ log Ψ ( e ρ ) 1 Ψ σ + ρ for a l l Ψ > 0

and

Ψ σ log Ψ ( e σ ) 1 for a l l 0 < Ψ < 1 .

3 Proofs of the main results

Proof of Theorem 1.1

Let u ( x , t ) C ( [ 0 , T ) ; W 0 1 , p ( Ω ) ) fulfilling x s 2 u t L 2 ( 0 , T ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) and u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) be a weak solution of problem (1.1). Since Ω is a bounded domain in R N , there is a ball B ( 0 , R ) of radius R = max x = ( x 1 , x 2 , , x N ) Ω ¯ i = 1 N x i 2 1 2 centered at x = 0 such that Ω B ( 0 , R ) . Recalling that q ( 1 , 2 ) , one can choose β ( 0 , 2 q ) such that q + β ( 1 , 2 ) . For this selected β , by Lemma 2.4, one has

log u 1 e β u β .

Taking the test function φ = u ( x , t ) in (2.1), one has

(3.1) 1 2 d d t Ω x s u 2 d x + Ω u p d x = Ω u q log u d x 1 e β Ω u q + β d x .

Making use of Hölder’s inequality, one obtains

(3.2) Ω u q + β d x Ω x s ( q + β ) 2 q β d x 2 q β 2 Ω x s u 2 d x q + β 2 B ( 0 , R ) x s ( q + β ) 2 q β d x 2 q β 2 Ω x s u 2 d x q + β 2 = ω N ( 2 q β ) 2 N + ( s N ) ( q + β ) R 2 N + ( s N ) ( q + β ) 2 q β 2 q β 2 C 0 Ω x s u 2 d x q + β 2 ,

where ω N is the surface area of the unit sphere B ( 0 , 1 ) . Combining (3.1) and (3.2), one arrives at

d d t Ω x s u 2 d x 2 C 0 e β Ω x s u 2 d x q + β 2 ,

which implies that

(3.3) Ω x s u 2 d x C 0 ( 2 q β ) e β t + Ω x s u 0 2 d x 2 q β 2 2 2 q β .

Substituting (3.3) into (3.2) suggests that

(3.4) Ω u q + β d x C 0 C 0 ( 2 q β ) e β t + Ω x s u 0 2 d x 2 q β 2 q + β 2 q β .

Taking the test function φ = u t ( x , t ) in (2.1), and using Lemma 2.4, Cauchy’s inequality and Hölder’s inequality lead us to that

(3.5) Ω x s ( u t ) 2 d x + 1 p d d t Ω u p d x = Ω u q 2 u log u u t d x = Ω 1 = { x Ω : u 1 } u q 2 u log u u t d x + Ω 2 = { x Ω : u < 1 } u q 2 u log u u t d x 1 e β Ω 1 u q + β 1 u t d x + 1 e ( q 1 ) Ω 2 u t d x ε 1 e β + ε 2 e ( q 1 ) Ω x s ( u t ) 2 d x + 1 4 ε 2 e ( q 1 ) Ω x s d x + 1 4 ε 1 e β Ω x s ( q + β ) 2 q β d x 2 q β q + β Ω u q + β d x 2 ( q + β 1 ) q + β .

If ε 1 and ε 2 are sufficiently small such that ε 1 e β + ε 2 e ( q 1 ) 1 . Then from (3.5), it follows that

(3.6) d d t Ω u p d x C 1 Ω u q + β d x 2 ( q + β 1 ) q + β + C 2 ,

where

C 1 = p 4 ε 1 e β B ( 0 , R ) x s ( q + β ) 2 q β d x 2 q β q + β = p 4 ε 1 e β C 0 2 q + β

and

C 2 = p 4 ε 2 e ( q 1 ) B ( 0 , R ) x s d x = p 4 ε 2 e ( q 1 ) ω N N + s R N + s .

Summing up (3.4) and (3.6), one immediately obtains

(3.7) d d t Ω u p d x C 1 C 0 2 ( q + β 1 ) q + β C 0 ( 2 q β ) e β t + Ω x s u 0 2 d x 2 q β 2 2 ( q + β 1 ) 2 q β + C 2 .

Integrating (3.7) with respect to the time variable over the interval ( 0 , T ) yields that

Ω u p d x e β C 1 q + β C 0 q + β 2 q + β C 0 ( 2 q β ) e β T + Ω x s u 0 2 d x 2 q β 2 2 ( q + β 1 ) 2 q β + 1 + C 2 T + Ω u 0 p d x e β C 1 q + β C 0 q + β 2 q + β Ω x s u 0 2 d x q + β 2 ,

which means that, for any T ( 0 , + ) , the W 1 , p norm of the weak solution u ( x , t ) is finite in [ 0 , T ) . That is to say, the weak solution u ( x , t ) of problem (1.1) is global in the sense of W 1 , p norm. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is complete.□

Proof of Theorem 1.2

Motivated by the method introduced by DiBenedetto [32], one can select, modulo a Steklov average, the test function φ = u p a u + in (2.1) to obtain

(3.8) 1 p a + 2 d d t Ω x s u + p a + 2 d x + p a + 1 ( a + 1 ) p Ω u + a + 1 p d x = Ω u q 2 u u p a u + log u d x 1 β Ω u + q + p a + β d x .

Recalling that max { 1 , s } < p < q < q + β < 2 and a max 1 p , 2 ( N p ) p ( N s ) p ( p s ) , and by virtue of Hölder’s inequality and Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, one has

Ω x s u + p a + 2 d x Ω x s d x 1 ( N p ) ( p a + 2 ) p ( N s ) ( a + 1 ) Ω x s ( u + a + 1 ) p ( N s ) N p d x ( N p ) ( p a + 2 ) p ( N s ) ( a + 1 ) C 3 κ ( N p ) ( p a + 2 ) p ( N s ) ( a + 1 ) Ω u + a + 1 p d x p a + 2 p ( a + 1 ) ,

which means that

(3.9) C 3 p ( a + 1 ) p a + 2 κ N p N s Ω x s u + p a + 2 d x p ( a + 1 ) p a + 2 Ω u + a + 1 p d x ,

where

C 3 = B ( 0 , R ) x s d x 1 ( N p ) ( p a + 2 ) p ( N s ) ( a + 1 ) = ω N N s R N s 1 ( N p ) ( p a + 2 ) p ( N s ) ( a + 1 ) ,

and κ = κ ( p , s , N ) is the embedding constant given in Lemma 2.1. On the other hand, by applying Hölder’s inequality again, one obtains

(3.10) Ω u + q + p a + β d x Ω x s ( q + β + p a ) 2 q β d x 2 q β p a + 2 Ω x s u + p a + 2 d x q + β + p a p a + 2 .

Letting

y ( t ) Ω x s u + p a + 2 d x ,

and summing up (3.8), (3.9), and (3.10), one arrives at

(3.11) d d t y ( t ) + C 4 ( y ( t ) ) p ( a + 1 ) p a + 2 C 5 ( y ( t ) ) q + β + p a p a + 2 ,

where

(3.12) C 4 = ( p a + 1 ) ( p a + 2 ) ( a + 1 ) p C 3 p ( a + 1 ) p a + 2 κ N p N s

and

(3.13) C 5 = p a + 2 β B ( 0 , R ) x s ( q + β + p a ) 2 q β d x 2 q β p a + 2 = p a + 2 β ω N ( 2 q β ) 2 N + s p a + ( s N ) ( q + β ) R 2 N + s p a + ( s N ) ( q + β ) 2 q β 2 q β p a + 2 .

Remembering that { 1 , s } < p < q < q + β < 2 and a max 1 p , 2 ( N p ) p ( N s ) p ( p s ) , one can check that

0 < p ( a + 1 ) p a + 2 < p a + q + β p a + 2 < 1 .

And then, by our assumption (1.2) and Lemma 2.2, one can claim that there exist two positive constants ξ and η such that, for any t 0 ,

(3.14) 0 y ( t ) ξ e η t .

Choosing

T 0 > max 0 , 1 η ln ξ 2 C 5 C 4 p a + 2 q + β p ,

then it follows from (3.11) and (3.14) that

d y d t + C 4 2 y p ( a + 1 ) p a + 2 0 , t T 0 .

Integrating both sides of the aforementioned inequality with respect to the time variable on [ T 0 , t ] , one has

0 y 2 p p a + 2 ( t ) y 2 p p a + 2 ( T 0 ) C 4 ( 2 p ) 2 ( p a + 2 ) ( t T 0 ) ,

which suggests that there exists a

T 0 T 0 , T 0 + 2 ( p a + 2 ) C 4 ( 2 p ) y 2 p p a + 2 ( T 0 )

such that

lim t T 0 y ( t ) = lim t T 0 Ω x s u + p a + 2 ( t ) d x = 0 .

Moreover, one can conclude that

Ω x s u + ( t ) d x = Ω x s u + p a + 2 ( t ) d x 0

as t T 0 for a = 1 p , and

Ω x s u + ( t ) d x Ω x s d x p a + 1 p a + 2 Ω x s u + p a + 2 ( t ) d x 1 p a + 2 ω N N s R N s p a + 1 p a + 2 Ω x s u + p a + 2 ( t ) d x 1 p a + 2 0

as t T 0 for a > 1 p .

On the other hand, by using the similar way, one can show that Ω x s u ( t ) d x will also vanish in finite time. Thus,

Ω x s u ( t ) d x = Ω x s u + ( t ) d x + Ω x s u ( t ) d x

will vanish in finite time. The proof of Theorem 1.2 is complete.□

Proof of Theorem 1.3

Denote

E ( u ( t ) ) = 1 p Ω u p d x 1 q Ω u q log u d x + 1 q 2 Ω u q d x .

A direct calculation shows that

d E ( u ( t ) ) d t = Ω x s ( u t ) 2 d x ,

which implies that

(3.15) E ( u ( t ) ) = E ( u 0 ) 0 t Ω x s ( u τ ) 2 d x d τ .

Set

M ( t ) = 1 2 Ω x s u 2 d x .

Taking the derivative of M ( t ) with respect to t , and using (3.15) lead us to

(3.16) M ( t ) = p E ( u ( t ) ) + q p q Ω u q log u d x + p q 2 Ω u q d x = p E ( u 0 ) + 0 t Ω x s ( u τ ) 2 d x d τ + q p q Ω u q log u d x + p q 2 Ω u q d x p E ( u 0 ) + q p q Ω u q log u d x .

If p = q . Then from (3.16), one can immediately see that, for any t 0 ,

(3.17) M ( t ) M ( 0 ) p E ( u 0 ) t .

Keeping in mind that

M ( 0 ) = Ω x s u 0 2 d x > 0

and E ( u 0 ) 0 , then (3.17) gives us that M ( t ) > 0 , which means that the solution u ( x , t ) of problem (1.1) cannot vanish in finite time.

If p > q . Then by Lemma 2.4 and Hölder’s inequality, one has

(3.18) M ( t ) p E ( u 0 ) + q p q Ω u q log u d x p E ( u 0 ) p q e β q Ω u q + β d x p E ( u 0 ) C 0 ( p q ) e β q ( M ( t ) ) q + β 2 .

Remembering that

M ( 0 ) = Ω x s u 0 2 d x > 0

and

E ( u 0 ) < 0 ,

by combining (3.18) with Lemma 2.3, one can conclude that

M ( t ) min M ( 0 ) , e β p q E ( u 0 ) C 0 ( p q ) 2 q + β > 0 .

Thus, the solution u ( x , t ) of problem (1.1) cannot vanish in finite time. The proof of Theorem 1.3 is complete.□

4 Conclusions

In this article, we deal with the global existence and extinction behavior of the solution for a fast diffusion p -Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void. By analyzing the effect of the singular potential x s and the logarithmic nonlinearity u q 2 u log u on the global existence and extinction behaviors of the solution, along with the modified energy estimates approach, Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality and some ordinary differential inequalities, the global existence of the solution is proved and sufficient conditions on the occurrence of the extinction and nonextinction phenomena are obtained.

Our next work is to study the numerical extinction and nonextinction phenomena of the parabolic problems like (1.1). We hope to give some numerical examples and applications for our theoretical researches in the near future.

Acknowledgments

The authors are sincerely grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading, valuable comments, and constructive suggestions, which greatly improved the quality of this article.

  1. Funding information: This article was supported by Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (Grant No. 23A0361).

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed significantly and equally to writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: Data are contained within the article.

References

[1] X. M. Deng and J. Zhou, Global existence, extinction, and non-extinction of solutions to a fast diffusion p-Laplace evolution equation with singular potential, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 26 (2020), no. 3, 509–523, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-019-09462-5. 10.1007/s10883-019-09462-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] Y. Cao and C. H. Liu, Initial boundary value problem for a mixed pseudo-parabolic p-Laplacian type equation with logarithmic nonlinearity, Electron. J. Differential Equations 2018 (2018), no. 116, 1–19. Search in Google Scholar

[3] H. Ding and J. Zhou, Global existence and blow-up for a mixed pseudo-parabolic p-Laplacian type equation with logarithmic nonlinearity, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 478 (2019), no. 2, 393–420, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.05.018. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.05.018Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. Ding and J. Zhou, Global existence and blow-up for a parabolic problem of Kirchhoff type with logarithmic nonlinearity, Appl. Math. Optim. 83 (2021), no. 11, 1651–1707, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-019-09603-z. 10.1007/s00245-019-09603-zSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Y. Z. Han, Blow-up at infinity of solutions to a semilinear heat equation with logarithmic nonlinearity, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 474 (2019), no. 1, 513–517, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.01.059. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.01.059Search in Google Scholar

[6] Y. J. He, H. H. Gao, and H. Wang, Blow-up and decay for a class of pseudo-parabolic p-Laplacian equation with logarithmic nonlinearity, Comput. Math. Appl. 75 (2018), no. 2, 459–469, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.09.027. 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.09.027Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. J. Liu and Z. B. Fang, On a singular epitaxial thin-film growth equation involving logarithmic nonlinearity, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 47 (2024), no. 7, 5699–5728, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.9887. 10.1002/mma.9887Search in Google Scholar

[8] X. Z. Sun and B. C. Liu, Classification of initial energy to a pseudo-parabolic equation with p(x)-Laplacian, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 29 (2023), no. 3, 873–899, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-022-09629-7. 10.1007/s10883-022-09629-7Search in Google Scholar

[9] J. Zhou, Behavior of solutions to a fourth-order nonlinear parabolic equation with logarithmic nonlinearity, Appl. Math. Optim. 84 (2021), no. 1, 191–225, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-019-09642-6. 10.1007/s00245-019-09642-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. Chen, P. Luo, and G. W. Liu, Global solution and blow-up of a semilinear heat equation with logarithmic nonlinearity, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 422 (2015), no. 1, 84–98, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.08.030. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.08.030Search in Google Scholar

[11] C. N. Le and X. T. Le, Global solution and blow-up for a class of p-Laplacian evolution equations with logarithmic nonlinearity, Acta Appl. Math. 151 (2017), no. 1, 149–169, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-017-0106-5. 10.1007/s10440-017-0106-5Search in Google Scholar

[12] N. C. Le and T. X. Le, Existence and nonexistence of global solutions for doubly nonlinear diffusion equations with logarithmic nonlinearity, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2018 (2018), no. 67, 1–25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2018.1.67. 10.14232/ejqtde.2018.1.67Search in Google Scholar

[13] X. M. Deng and J. Zhou, Global existence and blow-up of solutions to a semilinear heat equation with singular potential and logarithmic nonlinearity, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 19 (2020), no. 2, 923–939, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2020042. 10.3934/cpaa.2020042Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. L. Liao and Z. Tan, Global existence and blow-up of solutions to a class of non-Newton filtration equations with singular potential and logarithmic nonlinearity, 2020, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.01483. Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. Ayazoglu, G. Alisoy, S. Akbulut, and T. A. Aydin, Existence and extinction of solutions for parabolic equations with nonstandard growth nonlinearity, Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 53 (2024), no. 2, 367–381, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.1106985. 10.15672/hujms.1106985Search in Google Scholar

[16] Y. G. Gu, Necessary and sufficient conditions of extinction of solution on parabolic equations, Acta Math. Sinica (Chinese Ser.) 37 (1994), no. 1, 73–79.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Y. Z. Han and X. Liu, Global existence and extinction of solutions to a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with special medium void, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 51 (2021), no. 3, 869–881, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1216/rmj.2021.51.869. 10.1216/rmj.2021.51.869Search in Google Scholar

[18] C. H. Jin, J. X. Yin, and Y. Y. Ke, Critical extinction and blow-up exponents for fast diffusive polytropic filtration equation with sources, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 52 (2009), no. 2, 419–444, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0013091507000399. 10.1017/S0013091507000399Search in Google Scholar

[19] D. M. Liu and C. Y. Liu, Global existence and extinction singularity for a fast diffusive polytropic filtration equation with variable coefficient, Math. Probl. Eng. 2021 (2021), 5577777, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5577777. 10.1155/2021/5577777Search in Google Scholar

[20] D. M. Liu and C. Y. Liu, On the global existence and extinction behavior for a polytropic filtration equation with variable coefficients, Electron. Res. Arch. 30 (2022), no. 2, 425–439, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2022022. 10.3934/era.2022022Search in Google Scholar

[21] D. M. Liu and C. L. Mu, Critical extinction exponent for a doubly degenerate non-divergent parabolic equation with a gradient source, Appl. Anal. 97 (2018), no. 12, 2132–2141, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2017.1359557. 10.1080/00036811.2017.1359557Search in Google Scholar

[22] D. M. Liu and M. J. Yu, On the extinction problem for a p-Laplacian equation with a nonlinear gradient source, Open Math. 19 (2021), no. 1, 1069–1080, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2021-0091. 10.1515/math-2021-0091Search in Google Scholar

[23] X. Z. Sun, Z. Q. Han, and B. C. Liu, Classification of initial energy in a pseudo-parabolic equation with variable exponents and singular potential, Bull. Iranian Math. Soc. 50 (2024), no. 1, 10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41980-023-00844-x. 10.1007/s41980-023-00844-xSearch in Google Scholar

[24] Y. Tian and C. L. Mu, Extinction and non-extinction for a p-Laplacian equation with nonlinear source, Nonlinear Anal. 69 (2008), no. 8, 2422–2431, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.08.021. 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.021Search in Google Scholar

[25] J. Zhou and C. L. Mu, Critical blow-up and extinction exponents for non-Newton polytropic filtration equation with source, Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 46 (2009), no. 6, 1159–1173, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4134/BKMS.2009.46.6.1159. 10.4134/BKMS.2009.46.6.1159Search in Google Scholar

[26] J. X. Yin, J. Li, and C. H. Jin, Non-extinction and critical exponent for a polytropic filtration equation, Nonlinear Anal. 71 (2009), no. 1–2, 347–357, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2008.10.082. 10.1016/j.na.2008.10.082Search in Google Scholar

[27] X. M. Deng and J. Zhou, Extinction and non-extinction of solutions to a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with logarithmic non-linearity, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 28 (2022), no. 4, 759–769, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-021-09548-z. 10.1007/s10883-021-09548-zSearch in Google Scholar

[28] M. Badiale and G. Tarantello, A Sobolev-Hardy inequality with applications to a nonlinear elliptic equation arising in astrophysics, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 163 (2002), no. 4, 259–293, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002050200201. 10.1007/s002050200201Search in Google Scholar

[29] W. J. Liu and B. Wu, A note on extinction for fast diffusive p-Laplacian with sources, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 31 (2008), no. 12, 1383–1386, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.976. 10.1002/mma.976Search in Google Scholar

[30] B. Guo and W. J. Gao, Non-extinction of solutions to a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with Neumann boundary conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 422 (2015), no. 2, 1527–1531, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.09.006. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2014.09.006Search in Google Scholar

[31] M. L. Liao, The lifespan of solutions for a viscoelastic wave equation with a strong damping and logarithmic nonlinearity, Evol. Equ. Control Theory 11 (2022), no. 3, 781–792, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/eect.2021025. 10.3934/eect.2021025Search in Google Scholar

[32] E. DiBenedetto, Degenerate Parabolic Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0895-2Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-03-15
Revised: 2024-07-15
Accepted: 2024-08-30
Published Online: 2024-09-24

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Issue on Contemporary Developments in Graph Topological Indices
  2. On the maximum atom-bond sum-connectivity index of graphs
  3. Upper bounds for the global cyclicity index
  4. Zagreb connection indices on polyomino chains and random polyomino chains
  5. On the multiplicative sum Zagreb index of molecular graphs
  6. The minimum matching energy of unicyclic graphs with fixed number of vertices of degree two
  7. Special Issue on Convex Analysis and Applications - Part I
  8. Weighted Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities without any symmetry condition on the weight function
  9. Scattering threshold for the focusing energy-critical generalized Hartree equation
  10. (pq)-Compactness in spaces of holomorphic mappings
  11. Characterizations of minimal elements of upper support with applications in minimizing DC functions
  12. Some new Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for strongly h-convex functions on co-ordinates
  13. Global existence and extinction for a fast diffusion p-Laplace equation with logarithmic nonlinearity and special medium void
  14. Extension of Fejér's inequality to the class of sub-biharmonic functions
  15. On sup- and inf-attaining functionals
  16. Regularization method and a posteriori error estimates for the two membranes problem
  17. Rapid Communication
  18. Note on quasivarieties generated by finite pointed abelian groups
  19. Review Articles
  20. Amitsur's theorem, semicentral idempotents, and additively idempotent semirings
  21. A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs
  22. On an Oberbeck-Boussinesq model relating to the motion of a viscous fluid subject to heating
  23. Pullback and uniform exponential attractors for non-autonomous Oregonator systems
  24. Regular Articles
  25. On certain functional equation related to derivations
  26. The product of a quartic and a sextic number cannot be octic
  27. Combined system of additive functional equations in Banach algebras
  28. Enhanced Young-type inequalities utilizing Kantorovich approach for semidefinite matrices
  29. Local and global solvability for the Boussinesq system in Besov spaces
  30. Construction of 4 x 4 symmetric stochastic matrices with given spectra
  31. A conjecture of Mallows and Sloane with the universal denominator of Hilbert series
  32. The uniqueness of expression for generalized quadratic matrices
  33. On the generalized exponential sums and their fourth power mean
  34. Infinitely many solutions for Schrödinger equations with Hardy potential and Berestycki-Lions conditions
  35. Computing the determinant of a signed graph
  36. Two results on the value distribution of meromorphic functions
  37. Zariski topology on the secondary-like spectrum of a module
  38. On deferred f-statistical convergence for double sequences
  39. About j-Noetherian rings
  40. Strong convergence for weighted sums of (α, β)-mixing random variables and application to simple linear EV regression model
  41. On the distribution of powered numbers
  42. Almost periodic dynamics for a delayed differential neoclassical growth model with discontinuous control strategy
  43. A new distributionally robust reward-risk model for portfolio optimization
  44. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a viscoelastic Shear beam model with no rotary inertia: General and optimal decay results
  45. Silting modules over a class of Morita rings
  46. Non-oscillation of linear differential equations with coefficients containing powers of natural logarithm
  47. Mutually unbiased bases via complex projective trigonometry
  48. Hyers-Ulam stability of a nonlinear partial integro-differential equation of order three
  49. On second-order linear Stieltjes differential equations with non-constant coefficients
  50. Complex dynamics of a nonlinear discrete predator-prey system with Allee effect
  51. The fibering method approach for a Schrödinger-Poisson system with p-Laplacian in bounded domains
  52. On discrete inequalities for some classes of sequences
  53. Boundary value problems for integro-differential and singular higher-order differential equations
  54. Existence and properties of soliton solution for the quasilinear Schrödinger system
  55. Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for generalized trigonometrically and hyperbolic ρ-convex functions in two dimension
  56. Endpoint boundedness of toroidal pseudo-differential operators
  57. Matrix stretching
  58. A singular perturbation result for a class of periodic-parabolic BVPs
  59. On Laguerre-Sobolev matrix orthogonal polynomials
  60. Pullback attractors for fractional lattice systems with delays in weighted space
  61. Singularities of spherical surface in R4
  62. Variational approach to Kirchhoff-type second-order impulsive differential systems
  63. Convergence rate of the truncated Euler-Maruyama method for highly nonlinear neutral stochastic differential equations with time-dependent delay
  64. On the energy decay of a coupled nonlinear suspension bridge problem with nonlinear feedback
  65. The limit theorems on extreme order statistics and partial sums of i.i.d. random variables
  66. Hardy-type inequalities for a class of iterated operators and their application to Morrey-type spaces
  67. Solving multi-point problem for Volterra-Fredholm integro-differential equations using Dzhumabaev parameterization method
  68. Finite groups with gcd(χ(1), χc (1)) a prime
  69. Small values and functional laws of the iterated logarithm for operator fractional Brownian motion
  70. The hull-kernel topology on prime ideals in ordered semigroups
  71. ℐ-sn-metrizable spaces and the images of semi-metric spaces
  72. Strong laws for weighted sums of widely orthant dependent random variables and applications
  73. An extension of Schweitzer's inequality to Riemann-Liouville fractional integral
  74. Construction of a class of half-discrete Hilbert-type inequalities in the whole plane
  75. Analysis of two-grid method for second-order hyperbolic equation by expanded mixed finite element methods
  76. Note on stability estimation of stochastic difference equations
  77. Trigonometric integrals evaluated in terms of Riemann zeta and Dirichlet beta functions
  78. Purity and hybridness of two tensors on a real hypersurface in complex projective space
  79. Classification of positive solutions for a weighted integral system on the half-space
  80. A quasi-reversibility method for solving nonhomogeneous sideways heat equation
  81. Higher-order nonlocal multipoint q-integral boundary value problems for fractional q-difference equations with dual hybrid terms
  82. Noetherian rings of composite generalized power series
  83. On generalized shifts of the Mellin transform of the Riemann zeta-function
  84. Further results on enumeration of perfect matchings of Cartesian product graphs
  85. A new extended Mulholland's inequality involving one partial sum
  86. Power vector inequalities for operator pairs in Hilbert spaces and their applications
  87. On the common zeros of quasi-modular forms for Γ+0(N) of level N = 1, 2, 3
  88. One special kind of Kloosterman sum and its fourth-power mean
  89. The stability of high ring homomorphisms and derivations on fuzzy Banach algebras
  90. Integral mean estimates of Turán-type inequalities for the polar derivative of a polynomial with restricted zeros
  91. Commutators of multilinear fractional maximal operators with Lipschitz functions on Morrey spaces
  92. Vector optimization problems with weakened convex and weakened affine constraints in linear topological spaces
  93. The curvature entropy inequalities of convex bodies
  94. Brouwer's conjecture for the sum of the k largest Laplacian eigenvalues of some graphs
  95. High-order finite-difference ghost-point methods for elliptic problems in domains with curved boundaries
  96. Riemannian invariants for warped product submanifolds in Q ε m × R and their applications
  97. Generalized quadratic Gauss sums and their 2mth power mean
  98. Euler-α equations in a three-dimensional bounded domain with Dirichlet boundary conditions
  99. Enochs conjecture for cotorsion pairs over recollements of exact categories
  100. Zeros distribution and interlacing property for certain polynomial sequences
  101. Random attractors of Kirchhoff-type reaction–diffusion equations without uniqueness driven by nonlinear colored noise
  102. Study on solutions of the systems of complex product-type PDEs with more general forms in ℂ2
  103. Dynamics in a predator-prey model with predation-driven Allee effect and memory effect
  104. A note on orthogonal decomposition of 𝔰𝔩n over commutative rings
  105. On the δ-chromatic numbers of the Cartesian products of graphs
  106. Binomial convolution sum of divisor functions associated with Dirichlet character modulo 8
  107. Commutator of fractional integral with Lipschitz functions related to Schrödinger operator on local generalized mixed Morrey spaces
  108. System of degenerate parabolic p-Laplacian
  109. Stochastic stability and instability of rumor model
  110. Certain properties and characterizations of a novel family of bivariate 2D-q Hermite polynomials
  111. Stability of an additive-quadratic functional equation in modular spaces
  112. Monotonicity, convexity, and Maclaurin series expansion of Qi's normalized remainder of Maclaurin series expansion with relation to cosine
  113. On k-prime graphs
  114. On the existence of tripartite graphs and n-partite graphs
  115. Classifying pentavalent symmetric graphs of order 12pq
  116. Almost periodic functions on time scales and their properties
  117. Some results on uniqueness and higher order difference equations
  118. Coding of hypersurfaces in Euclidean spaces by a constant vector
  119. Cycle integrals and rational period functions for Γ0+(2) and Γ0+(3)
  120. Degrees of (L, M)-fuzzy bornologies
  121. A matrix approach to determine optimal predictors in a constrained linear mixed model
  122. On ideals of affine semigroups and affine semigroups with maximal embedding dimension
  123. Solutions of linear control systems on Lie groups
  124. A uniqueness result for the fractional Schrödinger-Poisson system with strong singularity
  125. On prime spaces of neutrosophic extended triplet groups
  126. On a generalized Krasnoselskii fixed point theorem
  127. On the relation between one-sided duoness and commutators
  128. Non-homogeneous BVPs for second-order symmetric Hamiltonian systems
  129. Erratum
  130. Erratum to “Infinitesimals via Cauchy sequences: Refining the classical equivalence”
  131. Corrigendum
  132. Corrigendum to “Matrix stretching”
  133. Corrigendum to “A comprehensive review of the recent numerical methods for solving FPDEs”
Downloaded on 20.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2024-0064/html
Scroll to top button