Home Incidence and awareness of dysphoric milk ejection reflex (DMER)
Article Open Access

Incidence and awareness of dysphoric milk ejection reflex (DMER)

  • Rachel L. Solmonovich EMAIL logo , Insaf Kouba , Christine Bailey , Wendi Andria , Kristen Demertzis , Matthew J. Blitz and Jolene Muscat
Published/Copyright: December 2, 2024

Abstract

Objectives

To determine Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex (DMER) incidence. Secondary objectives were to describe the symptom profiles and patient characteristics of DMER and assess DMER familiarity.

Methods

A prospective observational study of people who initiated breastfeeding after delivery between December 2022 and May 2023 at two hospitals in New York. Participants filled out an Initial Survey, assessing prior DMER familiarity, and recurring DMER Symptoms Surveys, assessing symptom presence, severity, and transiency. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics and clinical history. Descriptive and basic inferential statistics were performed. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Based on the DMER definition utilized, incidence was 26.9 % (n=21), and symptom severity was mostly very mild to moderate. Those with DMER had similar baseline characteristics to those without, apart from a significantly higher rate of having delivered via cesarean section (71.4.0 vs. 33.3 %, p<0.01). Among the 55 patients who completed the initial survey, 61.8 % were unfamiliar with the condition.

Conclusions

DMER is described as brief, abrupt, negative emotions experienced by breastfeeding individuals prior to milk letdown. We found that more than 1 in 4 participants screened positive. Future research could better define, quantify, qualify, and publicize this condition to inform clinical practices and facilitate successful breastfeeding relationships.

Introduction

Lactation, which is strongly encouraged by the World Health Organization and obstetric and pediatric societal organizations, offers known benefits and is recommended for up to the first two years of life or longer [1]. Breastfeeding counseling should encompass its advantages and associated conditions.

One such condition that is understudied is Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex (DMER). It is characterized by the abrupt onset of transient negative emotions that occurs in select lactating women just before the milk ejection reflex and milk release [2], [3], [4] and may lead to early weaning [5]. Symptoms last between 2 and 3 min, resolving after milk letdown [6], and can include anxiety, sadness, panic, irritability, oversensitivity, agitation, and tearfulness [7]. Many may mistake DMER for postpartum depression [8].

DMER likely has a physiologic basis that may be influenced by environmental stressors and psychological context [6]. It has been hypothesized to involve several pathophysiological mechanisms, mainly centered around the hormones oxytocin and dopamine [8], 9]. Oxytocin normally facilitates milk ejection and promotes a calming effect. However, in DMER it may paradoxically upregulate the stress response [10]. Abnormal fluctuations in dopamine levels with increased prolactin levels during breastfeeding may mirror the transient DMER symptoms and is another hypothesis for the dysphoria [6], 10].

Limited information on DMER comes mostly from lay publications, including various breastfeeding websites and blogs. The minimal peer-reviewed literature on this condition likely reflects a lack of awareness about this topic within the medical community. It is important that providers recognize this condition, associated symptoms, and potential impacts for better diagnosis and differentiation from other postpartum and lactation conditions. Our primary objective was to determine the incidence of DMER. The secondary objectives were to describe symptom profiles and patient characteristics of DMER-positive patients and assess prior DMER familiarity.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study involving patients who initiated breastfeeding between December 2022 and May 2023 at two hospitals within a large healthcare system in New York. Additional inclusion criteria included willingness to fill out recurring surveys and English proficiency. This project was approved by the Northwell Health Human Research Protection Program and Institutional Review Board and complied with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki regarding ethical conduct of research involving human subjects.

An established, validated instrument did not exist to address our objectives, so the study team designed an Initial Survey (Supplementary 1), containing items on breastfeeding goals and history and prior DMER familiarity, and a DMER Symptom Survey (Supplementary 2), assessing symptom presence, severity, and transiency (i.e. resolved within 5 min with a subsequent return to baseline). Listed symptoms included negative emotions, such as anxiety, depression, guilt, and impatience, mentioned previously in case reports/series and lay publications.

Breastfeeding patients were recruited by the primary author and lactation counselors on postpartum day 1–2, and they were given a brief introduction about DMER and how it may present. Upon consenting for study participation, participants were emailed a secure link with the Initial Survey, where they rated their prior DMER familiarity on a 5-point Likert scale of not at all to extremely familiar with DMER. They then received the DMER Symptoms Survey thrice daily for one week, where they subjectively rated symptom severity on a 5-point Likert scale of none to severe. Additionally, the surveys included a question addressing the transiency of these symptoms with a return to baseline mood (yes/no). Study data were collected and managed using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) hosted at Northwell Health [11], 12]. REDCap is a secure, HIPAA-compliant, web-based system for managing online surveys and databases. Patient demographics and clinical history, including age, BMI, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, and NICU admission status were collected from medical records.

The primary outcome was DMER-positive status, as assessed on the daily DMER Symptoms Survey. There are no defined diagnostic criteria for DMER. For this study, we considered those DMER positive if they endorsed transient negative emotions or physical symptoms with a subsequent return to their baseline mood that recurred in ≥50 % of surveyed breastfeeding episodes. To meet this definition, at least 2 out of 2 surveys had to be positive, or a majority if 3 or more surveys were completed. The secondary outcomes were symptom severity and prior DMER familiarity.

Descriptive and clinical data were summarized with descriptive statistics. Basic inferential statistics were performed to examine relationships between variables using OpenEpi, Version 3, open-source calculator. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Out of 203 patients approached for participation, 151 consented, 1 withdrew, and 67 did not complete the Initial Survey or any DMER Symptoms Surveys and were not included in our analyses. The 78 people who filled out the DMER Symptoms Survey, averaging 6.9 surveys each (SD 6.5), were included in the primary analysis. The majority were married (79.5 %), nulliparous (56.4 %), and non-Hispanic white (57.7 %).

There were 538 completed DMER Symptoms Surveys, 168 of which were from those who screened positive for DMER. Those who screened positive averaged 8.0 surveys each (SD 5.1). The DMER incidence rate was 26.9 % (n=21). Symptom and severity profiles are listed in Table 1 and shown in Figure 1. All emotional and physical symptoms listed in the survey were endorsed by at least one individual, with a majority experiencing very mild agitation, annoyance, anxiety, frustration, guilt, and impatience.

Table 1:

Symptom and severity profile among DMER positive participants, n=21.

Symptoms Severity
Very mild Mild Moderate Severe
Aggression 6 (28.6) 3 (14.3) 1 (4.8) 0 (0)
Agitation 11 (52.4) 7 (33.3) 3 (14.3) 1 (4.8)
Anger 7 (33.3) 2 (9.5) 2 (9.5) 1 (4.8)
Annoyance 14 (66.7) 6 (28.6) 3 (14.3) 1 (4.8)
Anxiety 17 (81.0) 10 (47.6) 6 (28.6) 2 (9.5)
Confusion 5 (23.8) 4 (19.0) 1 (4.8) 1 (4.8)
Depression 7 (33.3) 5 (23.8) 4 (19.0) 2 (9.5)
Distress 6 (28.6) 5 (23.8) 1 (4.8) 2 (9.5)
Fear 5 (23.8) 6 (28.6) 3 (14.3) 1 (4.8)
Frustration 17 (81.0) 9 (42.9) 3 (14.3) 1 (4.8)
Guilt 14 (66.7) 10 (47.6) 2 (9.5) 2 (9.5)
Impatience 17 (81.0) 9 (42.9) 3 (14.3) 2 (9.5)
Nausea/vomiting 3 (14.3) 1 (4.8) 0 (0) 1 (4.8)
Oversensitivity 11 (52.4) 8 (38.1) 2 (9.5) 1 (4.8)
Panic 8 (38.1) 3 (14.3) 1 (4.8) 1 (4.8)
Paranoia 2 (9.5) 2 (9.5) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Pit in stomach 4 (19.0) 6 (28.6) 2 (9.5) 2 (9.5)
Restlessness 7 (33.3) 5 (23.8) 1 (4.8) 0 (0)
Sadness 6 (28.6) 6 (28.6) 4 (19.0) 1 (4.8)
Tenseness 7 (33.3) 6 (28.6) 0 (0) 1 (4.8)
Worthlessness 1 (4.8) 2 (9.5) 1 (4.8) 0 (0)
  1. Data is presented as number (%). Patients could experience multiple symptoms and varying severity with each breastfeeding experience and when completing the surveys.

Figure 1: 
Symptom and severity profile among DMER positive participants. Patients could experience multiple symptoms and varying severity with each breastfeeding experience and when completing the surveys.
Figure 1:

Symptom and severity profile among DMER positive participants. Patients could experience multiple symptoms and varying severity with each breastfeeding experience and when completing the surveys.

The majority of those who screened positive were <35 years old (71.4 %), non-Hispanic white self-identified race and ethnicity (52.4 %), married (72.7 %), and nulliparous (61.9 %), which was statistically similar to the DMER-negative group. DMER-positive participants were more likely to deliver via cesarean section than those who did not screen positive for DMER, 71.4 vs. 33.3 %, respectively (p<0.01). A minority had a history of anxiety/depression, preeclampsia, or a NICU admission, which was statistically similar to the DMER-negative group (Table 2).

Table 2:

Comparison of patient characteristics between DMER positive and negative participants.

Characteristic DMER (n=21) No DMER (n=57) p-Value
Age 31.0 ± 4.4 33.0 ± 4.7 0.09
Advanced maternal age 6 (28.6) 17 (29.8) 0.47
Non-hispanic white race and ethnicitya 11 (52.4) 34 (59.6) 0.29
Married 16 (72.7) 46 (80.7) 0.33
Nulliparous 13 (61.9) 31 (54.4) 0.28
BMI, mg/kg2 33.0 ± 9.3 31 ± 8.0 0.35
Public insurance 1 (4.8) 2 (3.5) 0.40
Anxiety/depression 4 (19.0) 6 (10.5) 0.17
Thyroid disease 2 (9.5) 8 (14.0) 0.32
Preeclampsia 3 (14.3) 7 (12.3) 0.40
GA at delivery 39.0 ± 1.2 39.0 ± 1.3 1.00
Cesarean section 15 (71.4) 19 (33.3) <0.01
NICU admission 1 (4.8) 3 (5.3) 0.49
  1. Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%). aSelf-identified race and ethnicity were selected from pre-specified categories at the time of hospital admission. The value in bold indicates that it is a significant p-Value (because it is <0.05).

Of those who completed the Initial Survey (n=55), 61.8 % (n=34) selected that they were unfamiliar with DMER, 29.1 % (n=16) selected they were slightly familiar, and 9.1 % (n=5) selected they were moderately familiar. No one selected that they were very or extremely familiar with DMER.

Among those who completed the Initial Survey, 28 (50.9 %) had previously breastfed, during which 8 (28.6 %) experienced DMER symptoms while breastfeeding previous children, and 3 (37.5 %) stopped breastfeeding because of DMER. Out of the 8 who reported prior DMER experience, 6 filled out the DMER Symptom Survey, and they all experienced a recurrence of DMER symptoms while breastfeeding their current infant.

Discussion

Our study is the first prospective study to evaluate DMER incidence and severity. Our small sample size limits robust conclusions and introduces bias. Restricting to English-proficient participants reduces generalizability. Also, we did not discern whether participants were feeding directly or pumping when completing the survey and could not comment on whether mode of lactation impacts symptom presence or severity. Nonetheless, we found that more than 1 in 4 lactating patients in our sample developed DMER, which is within the range of currently reported prevalence rates of 6.0–27.7 % [5], 7], 13], 14]. Since our participants were only surveyed during the first week postpartum, we may be underestimating the incidence rate, as symptoms may only initially present after the first week.

Most participants were unfamiliar with the condition. The gap between the higher number experiencing DMER and the lack awareness of the condition highlights the need for improved patient counseling and education, which begins with spreading awareness among healthcare providers. Fortunately, most patients experienced very mild symptoms, but we did not trend symptom severity beyond the first week postpartum. Given the importance of breastfeeding, and the recently updated recommendation by the World Health Organization to continue breastfeeding to 2 years of age, higher quality clinical research on this condition should better define, quantify, and qualify DMER to inform clinical practice and support successful breastfeeding relationships.


Corresponding author: Rachel L. Solmonovich, MD, Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Shore University Hospital, Bay Shore, NY 11706, USA; and Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, NY 2000 Marcus Ave, Suite 300 11042-1069, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: The local Institutional Review Board approved this study, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  6. Research funding: None declared.

  7. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Prevention CfDCa. 2023;Pages https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/about-breastfeeding/why-it-matters.html on 04/15/2024.Search in Google Scholar

2. Heise, MA, Wiessinger, D. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex: a case report. Int Breastfeed J 2011;6:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-6-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Ureño, LT, Buchheit, LT, Hopkinson, GS, Berry-Cabán, SC. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex: a case series. Breastfeed Med 2018;13:85–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2017.0086.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Liu, H, Li, J, Li, X, Lu, H. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex: report of two cases and postulated mechanisms and treatment. Breastfeed Med 2023;18:388–94. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2022.0206.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Kacır, A, Karabayir, N, Karademir, F, Başıbüyük, M, Öcal, Ö, Büke, Ö, et al.. Impact of dysphoric milk ejection reflex on mental Health. Breastfeeding Medicine; 2024.10.1089/bfm.2024.0055Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Herr, LS, Devido, J, Zoucha, R, Demirci, RJ. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex in human lactation: an integrative literature Review. J Hum Lactation 2024;40:237–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241231239.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Ureño, LT, Berry-Cabán, SC, Adams, A, Buchheit, LT, Hopkinson, GS. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex: a descriptive study. Breastfeed Med 2019;14:666–73. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2019.0091.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Deif, R, Burch, ME, Azar, J, Yonis, N, Gabal, AM, Kramani, EN, et al. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex: the psychoneurobiology of the breastfeeding experience. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health. 2021;2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.669826.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Uvnas-Moberg, K, Kendall-Tackett, K. The mystery of D-MER: what can hormonal research tell us about dysphoric milk-ejection reflex? Clinical Lactation 2018;9:23–9. https://doi.org/10.1891/2158-0782.9.1.23.Search in Google Scholar

10. Ahmed, M, Mahmud, A, Mughal, S, Shah, HH. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex – call for future trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024;310:627–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07503-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Thielke, R, Payne, J, Gonzalez, N, Conde, JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf 2009;42:377–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Harris, PA, Taylor, R, Minor, BL, Elliott, V, Fernandez, M, O’Neal, L, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inf 2019;95:103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Moriyama, Y, Nakao, Y, Yamamoto, N, Oki, T. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex among Japanese mothers: a self-administered survey. Int Breastfeed J 2024;19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-024-00625-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Nguyen, L, Stokes, S, Alsup, K, Allen, J, Zahler-Miller, C. Dysphoric milk ejection reflex: characteristics, risk factors, and its association with depression scores and breastfeeding self-efficacy. Breastfeeding Medicine; 2024.10.1089/bfm.2023.0241Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0299).


Received: 2024-07-07
Accepted: 2024-10-14
Published Online: 2024-12-02
Published in Print: 2025-02-25

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Sex differences in lung function of adolescents or young adults born prematurely or of very low birth weight: a systematic review
  4. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  5. Shifts in peak month of births and socio-economic factors: a study of divided and reunified Germany 1950–2022
  6. The predictive role of serial transperineal sonography during the first stage of labor for cesarean section
  7. Gestational weight gain and obstetric outcomes in women with obesity in an inner-city population
  8. Placental growth factor as a predictive marker of preeclampsia in twin pregnancy
  9. Learning curve for the perinatal outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for selective fetal reduction: a single-center, 10-year experience from 2013 to 2023
  10. External validation of a non-invasive vaginal tool to assess the risk of intra-amniotic inflammation in pregnant women with preterm labor and intact membranes
  11. Placental fetal vascular malperfusion in maternal diabetes mellitus
  12. The importance of the cerebro-placental ratio at term for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in appropriate for gestational age fetuses
  13. Comparing achievability and reproducibility of pulsed wave Doppler and tissue Doppler myocardial performance index and spatiotemporal image correlation annular plane systolic excursion in the cardiac function assessment of normal pregnancies
  14. Characteristics of the pregnancy and labour course in women who underwent COVID-19 during pregnancy
  15. Original Articles – Fetus
  16. Sonographic visualization and measurement of the fetal optic chiasm and optic tract and association with the cavum septum pellucidum
  17. The association among fetal head position, fetal head rotation and descent during the progress of labor: a clinical study of an ultrasound-based longitudinal cohort study in nulliparous women
  18. Fetal hypoplastic left heart syndrome: key factors shaping prognosis
  19. The value of ultrasound spectra of middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery blood flow in adverse pregnancy outcomes
  20. Original Articles – Neonates
  21. A family-centric, comprehensive nurse-led home oxygen programme for neonatal chronic lung disease: home oxygen policy evaluation (HOPE) study
  22. Effects of a respiratory function indicator light on visual attention and ventilation quality during neonatal resuscitation: a randomised controlled crossover simulation trial
  23. Short Communication
  24. Incidence and awareness of dysphoric milk ejection reflex (DMER)
Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2024-0299/html?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOopk1l0gARUO1q4UG_hUIC0O4Gz_K_DttJ5srFW_pYKFmBSBnZ1j
Scroll to top button