Startseite Videoed storytelling in primary education EFL: exploring trainees’ digital shift
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Videoed storytelling in primary education EFL: exploring trainees’ digital shift

  • Pedro Antonio Férez Mora EMAIL logo und Yvette Coyle
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. Mai 2023

Abstract

This study explores the challenges and benefits primary education EFL trainees (N = 28) reported when designing and videoing a storytelling session originally intended to be conducted offline with young learners. This change of scenario was caused by the COVID-19 crisis. The data for the study were derived from the trainees’ written reflections, focus group interviews, videos of instructional sessions and student-authored multimodal videos, which were explored to interpret trainees’ creative processes while engaged in multimodal composing. The results indicate that trainees hold videoed storytelling to have a similar number of challenges and benefits as face-to-face storytelling. However, two of the reported advantages, enhanced creativity and self-confidence, sit at misconceptions based on trainees’ limited knowledge of the pedagogical potential of multimodal resources. The findings have important educational implications in helping develop a pedagogy of videoed storytelling, while also highlighting the need for teacher training programs to specifically target the development of teachers’ competence in multimodal pedagogy.


Corresponding author: Pedro Antonio Férez Mora, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, E-mail:

Funding source: Spanish Ministry of Education and Research

Award Identifier / Grant number: PGC2018-095393-B-I00

Appendix: Summary of the LRRH storytelling session

Steps Linguistic contents Socio-critical contents
– Narration scaffolded with acting until the wolf starts knocking on the door of granny’s house – Listening
– Speaking (repeating targeted vocabulary)
– Narration is stopped and activity for young learners to participate (“thought tunnel”) is explained by trainees, now as teachers Should(n’t)… – Critical thinking (evaluation)
because…
– Speaking
– Narration scaffolded with acting until the wolf is chasing after LRRH and the woodcutter comes to rescue her – Listening
– Speaking (repeating targeted forms)
– Narration is stopped and activity for young learners to participate (freeze frames + thought tapping) is explained/introduced by trainees, now as teachers – Lexis to express feelings + because… – Empathy with characters
– Speaking
– Narration scaffolded with acting until the end of the fairy tale – Listening
– Speaking (repeating targeted forms)
– Final activity: trainees explain/introduce the last activity in which young learners in small groups script an alternative ending for the fairy tale. In this ending LRRH saves herself without the woodcutter’s help – Writing – Critical thinking (analyzing, evaluating and creating)
– Whole class activity in which young learners react to the fact that in fairy tales women tend to be conceived as passive agents – Speaking – Discussing a gender stereotype

References

Alberola-Mulet, Iván, Marcos, J. & InésLozano-Cabezas. 2021. Teachers’ beliefs about the role of digital educational resources. Education Sciences 11(5), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050239.Suche in Google Scholar

Ajayi, Lasisi. 2009. English as a second language learners’ exploration of multimodal texts in a junior high school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 52(7). 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.52.7.4.Suche in Google Scholar

Ajayi, Lasisi. 2010. Preservice teachers’ knowledge, attitude, and perception of their preparation to teach multiliteracies/multimodality. The Teacher Educator 46(1). 6–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2010.488279.Suche in Google Scholar

Bland, Janice. 2021. Ideology issues. Children’s Literature in English Language Education, 9(2). i–v.Suche in Google Scholar

Choi, Jayoung & YiYoungjoo. 2016. Teachers’ integration of multimodality into classroom practices for English language learners. TESOL Journal 7(2). 304–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.204.Suche in Google Scholar

Corbin, Juliet & Anslem Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781452230153Suche in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Elola, Idoia & Ana Oskoz. 2022. Reexamining feedback on L2 digital writing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 12(4). 575–595. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.3.Suche in Google Scholar

Farías, Miguel & Leonardo Veliz. 2019. Multimodal texts in Chilean English teaching education: Experiences from educators and pre-service teachers. Profile – Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development 21(2). 13-27. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v21n2.75172 (accessed 10 March 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Godber, A. Kathleen & R. Atkins. Denise. 2021. COVID-19 impacts on teaching and learning: A collaborative autoethnography by two higher education lecturers. Frontiers in Education 6. 647524. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.647524.Suche in Google Scholar

Hafner, Cristoph. A. 2014. Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. Tesol Quarterly 48(4). 655–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.138.Suche in Google Scholar

Hafner, Cristoph A. & Lindsay Miller. 2011. Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language, Learning and Technology 15(3). 68–86.Suche in Google Scholar

Hatlevik, Ove & A. Christophersen Knut. 2013. Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school. Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education 63. 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Hundley, Melanie & HolbrookTerie. 2013. Set in stone or set in motion? Multimodal and digital writing with preservice English teachers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56(6). 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.171.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lianjang & Luk Jasmine. 2016. Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity. System 59. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Lauren & Maureen Kendrick. 2017. “Impossible is nothing”: Expressing difficult knowledge through digital storytelling. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 60(6). 667–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.624.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Deoksoon, Drina, K. & YanLi. 2021. A multimodal model for analyzing middle school English language learners’ digital stories. International Journal of Educational Research Open 2, 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100067.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203299234Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Lai, Kwok-Wing & PrattKeryn. 2008. Positive to a degree: The effects of ICT use in New Zealand secondary schools. Computers in the Schools. Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research 24(3–4). 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v24n03_07.Suche in Google Scholar

Lantolf, James P. & Steven Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of L2 development. In Bill VanPatten & Jessica Williams (eds.), Theories in Second Language Acquisition, 208–226. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Lawrence, Arul & Amaladoss Xavier. 2013. Lateral thinking of prospective teachers. Journal of Educational Reflection 1(1). 28–32.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Mimi. 2020. Multimodal pedagogy in TESOL teacher education: Students’ perspectives. System 94. 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102337.Suche in Google Scholar

Liang, J. Wei & V. Lim. Fei. 2020. A pedagogical framework for digital multimodal composing in the English Language classroom. Innovation in. Language Learning and Teaching 15(4). 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1800709.Suche in Google Scholar

Lim, Fei, V. & Thi, T. Nguyen. 2022. If you have the freedom, you don’t need to even think hard” – Considerations in designing for students’ agency through digital multimodal composing in the language classroom. Language and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2107875.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, Suzanne M. 2007. English teacher learning for new times: Digital video composing as multimodal literacy practice. English Education 40(1). 64–83.10.58680/ee20076426Suche in Google Scholar

Morton, Larry, L., Robert Vesco, Neil, H. & Michael, A. Awender. 1997. Student teacher anxieties related to class management, pedagogy, evaluation and staff relations. British Journal of Educational Psychology 67(1). 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01228.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Mourão, Sandie. 2016. Picturebooks in the primary EFL classroom. Children’s Literature in Language Education Journal 4(1). 25–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Muñoz-Najar, Alberto, Alison G. Gilberto Sanzana, Amer Hasan, Juan C. Cobo Romaní, Joao P. W. D. Azevedo & Maryam Akmal. 2021. Remote learning during COVID- 19: Lessons from today, principles for tomorrow. Washington: World Bank Group.10.1596/36665Suche in Google Scholar

Nelson, Mark. E. & H. Johnson. Neil. 2014. Editors’ introduction: Multimodality, creativity and language and literacy education. Pedagogies: International Journal 9(1). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.879410.Suche in Google Scholar

Norton, Lin. 2009. Action Research in teaching and learning. A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203870433Suche in Google Scholar

Paesani, Kate, Heather Willis Allen & Beatrice Dupuy. 2016. Multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Boston: Pearson.Suche in Google Scholar

Peng, Jian-E. 2019. The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System 82. 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Pham, Quang, N., & MimiLi. 2022. Digital multimodal composing using Visme: EFL students’ perspectives. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00687-w.Suche in Google Scholar

Pirbhai-Illich, Fatima. 2010. Aboriginal students engaging and struggling with critical multiliteracies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 54(4). 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.54.4.3.Suche in Google Scholar

Rance-Roney, Judith. 2010. Jump-starting language and schema for English-language learners: Teacher-composed digital jumpstarts for academic reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53(5). 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.53.5.4.Suche in Google Scholar

Reyes-Torres, Agustín & Portalés-Raga Matilde. 2020. Multimodal approach to foster the multiliteracies pedagogy in the teaching of EFL through picturebooks: The Snow Lion. Atlantis 42(1). 94–119. https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2020-42.1.06.Suche in Google Scholar

Ross, Shawna & DowlandDouglas. 2019. Guest Editors’ introduction: Anxious pedagogies. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature. Language, Composition, and Culture 19(3). 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-7615451.Suche in Google Scholar

Saldana, J. 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Sayeski, Kristin, L., Bethany Hamilton-Jones, Grace Cutler, Gentry, A. & LaurenHusney. 2019. The role of practice and feedback for developing teacher candidate’s opportunities to respond expertise. Teacher Education and Special Education 42(1). 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417735876.Suche in Google Scholar

Selwyn, Neil. 2009. Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology 34(2). 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923622.Suche in Google Scholar

Shook, Alison C. 2012. A study of preservice educators’ dispositions to change behavior management strategies. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and. Youth 56(2). 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2011.606440.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Blaine, E., Mark, B. & Carolina, R. 2017. Multimodal codemeshing: Bilingual adolescents’ processes composing across modes. Journal of Second Language Writing 36. 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Sundqvist, Pia & K. Sylvén Liss. 2014. Language-related computer use: Focus on young L2 English learners in Sweden. ReCALL 26(1). 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000232.Suche in Google Scholar

Tao, Jian & . 2022. Teaching and learning languages online: Challenges and responses. System 107. 102819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102819.Suche in Google Scholar

Vagos, Paula & CarvalhaisLénia. 2022. Online versus classroom teaching: Impact on teacher and student relationship quality and quality of life. Frontiers in Psychology 13. 828774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828774.Suche in Google Scholar

Veliz, Leonardo & Shokouhi Hossein. 2020. EAL teachers’ (un)preparedness to implement classroom practice for multiliteracies pedagogy. In Wenhao Tao & Indika Liyanage (eds.), Multiligual educatiton yearbook 2020: Teacher education and multilingual contexts, 63–80. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-41211-1_4Suche in Google Scholar

Waddington, Julie. 2020. Motivating self and others through a whole school storytelling project: Authentic language and literacy development. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 7(1). 124–144. https://doi.org/10.21283/2376905X.11.188.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Yu-Feng 2012. Multimodal composing in digital storytelling. Computers and Composition 29(3). 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Ya-Ting & I. Wu Wan-Chi. 2012. Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education 59(2). 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Yi, Youngjoo & ChoiJayoung. 2015. Teachers’ views of multimodal practices in K-12 classrooms: Voices from teachers in the United States. Tesol Quarterly 49(4). 838–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.219.Suche in Google Scholar

Yi, Youngjoo & Angay-Crowder Tuba. 2016. Multimodal pedagogies for teacher education in TESOL. Tesol Quarterly 50(4). 988–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.326.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-09-28
Accepted: 2023-04-26
Published Online: 2023-05-17
Published in Print: 2024-11-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. “Am I really abroad?” The informal language contact and social networks of Chinese foundation students in the UK
  4. Comprehension of English articles by Korean learners of L2 English and L3 Spanish
  5. Motivation and growth in kanji proficiency: a longitudinal study using latent growth curve modeling
  6. The impact of textual enhancement on the acquisition of third person possessive pronouns by child EFL learners
  7. Domain-general grit and domain-specific grit: conceptual structures, measurement, and associations with the achievement of German as a foreign language
  8. The different effects of the ideal L2 self and intrinsic motivation on reading performance via engagement among young Chinese second-language learners
  9. Image-schema-based-instruction enhanced L2 construction learning with the optimal balance between attention to form and meaning
  10. Investigating willingness to communicate in synchronous group discussion tasks: one step closer towards authentic communication
  11. Investigating willingness to communicate vis-à-vis learner talk in a low-proficiency EAP classroom in the UK study-abroad context
  12. Functions, sociocultural explanations and conversational influence of discourse markers: focus on zenme shuo ne in L2 Chinese
  13. The impact of abdominal enhancement techniques on L1 Spanish, Japanese and Mandarin speakers’ English pronunciation
  14. Discourse competence across band scores: an analysis of speaking performance in the General English Proficiency Test
  15. Videoed storytelling in primary education EFL: exploring trainees’ digital shift
  16. Competing factors in SLA: how the CASP model of SLA explains the acquisition of English restrictive relative clauses by native speakers of Arabic and Korean
  17. Factors behind L2 English learners’ performance of oppositional speech acts: a look at pragmatic-related episodes (PREs) during thinking aloud
  18. Revisiting after-class boredom via exploratory structural equation modeling
  19. Exploring aural vocabulary knowledge for TOEIC as a language exit requirement in higher education in Taiwan
  20. Grammatical gender assignment in L3 versus L4 Swedish: a pseudo-longitudinal study
  21. Strategic reading comprehension in L2 and L3: assuming relative interdependence within Cummins’ linguistic interdependence hypothesis
  22. Incidental collocational learning from reading-while-listening and the impact of synchronized textual enhancement
  23. Learnability of L2 collocations and L1 influence on L2 collocational representations of Japanese learners of English
  24. The use of interlanguage pragmatic learning strategies (IPLS) by L2 learners: the impact of age, gender, language learning experience, and L2 proficiency levels
  25. “They forget and forget all the time.” The complexity of teaching adult deaf emergent readers print literacy
  26. Exploring the learning benefits of collaborative writing in L2 Chinese: a product-oriented perspective
  27. Investigating the effects of varying Accelerative Integrated Method instruction on spoken recall accuracy: a case study with junior primary learners of French
  28. Testing a model of EFL teachers’ work engagement: the roles of teachers’ professional identity, L2 grit, and foreign language teaching enjoyment
  29. The combined effects of a higher-level verb distribution and verb semantics on second language learners’ restriction of L2 construction generalization
  30. Insights from an empirical study on communicative functions and L1 use during conceptual mediation in L2 peer interaction
  31. On the acquisition of tense and agreement in L2 English by adult speakers of L1 Chinese
Heruntergeladen am 9.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2022-0191/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen