L2 textbook input and L2 written production: a case of Korean locative postposition–verb construction

References

Aksan, Mustafa & Yeşim Aksan. 2018. Linguistic corpora: A view from Turkish. In Kemal Oflazer & Murat Saraçlar (eds.), Turkish natural language processing, 291–315. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-90165-7_14Search in Google Scholar

Alsaif, Abdullah & James Milton. 2012. Vocabulary input from school textbooks as a potential contributor to the small uptake gained by English as a foreign language learners in Saudi Arabia. The Language Learning Journal 40(1). 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.658221.Search in Google Scholar

Ambridge, Ben, Evan Kidd, Caroline Rowland & Anna Theakston. 2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500091400049X.Search in Google Scholar

Bates, Elizabeth & Brian MacWhinney. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In Brian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates (eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 3–76. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beatty, Ken. 2013. Teaching and researching: Computer-assisted language learning, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315833774Search in Google Scholar

Behrens, Heike. 2009. Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics 47(2). 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2003. A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27(6). 843–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

Choo, Miho & Hye-Young Kwak. 2008. Using Korean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139168496Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2008. The later development of an early-emerging system: The curious case of the Polish genitive. Linguistics 46(3). 629–650.10.1515/LING.2008.021Search in Google Scholar

Dittmar, Miriam, Kirsten Abbot-Smith, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2008. German children’s comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development 79(4). 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01181.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2). 143–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick. 2006. Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative-cognitive CREED. AILA Review 19(1). 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.08ell.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick & Fernando Ferreira-Junior. 2009. Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal 93(3). 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick, Matthew O’Donnell & Ute Römer. 2015. Usage-based language learning. In Brian MacWhinney & William O’Grady (eds.), The handbook of language emergence, 163–180. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9781118346136.ch7Search in Google Scholar

Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl, Seung Kyung Kim, Hyeree Choo, Alain Ghio, Julia Herschensohn & Sungryong Koh. 2019. Look and listen! The online processing of Korean case by native and non-native speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34(3). 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1549332.Search in Google Scholar

Futrell, Richard & Edward Gibson. 2017. L2 processing as noisy channel language comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(4). 683–684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728916001061.Search in Google Scholar

Gabrielatos, Costas. 2018. Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In Charlotte Taylor & Ann Marchi (eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review, 225–258. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315179346-11Search in Google Scholar

Gentner, Dedre. 1978. On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development 49(4). 988–998.10.2307/1128738Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2013. Constructionist approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0002Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc772nnSearch in Google Scholar

Goldschneider, Jennifer & Robert DeKeyser. 2005. Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 55(S1). 27–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00295.x.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Sang-Mee. 2014. An analysis of errors on the usage of postpositions in the discussions of advanced Korean language learners. Bilingual Research 57. 223–255. https://doi.org/10.17296/korbil.2014..57.223.Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin & Holger Diessel. 2017. Entrenchment in construction grammar. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge, 57–74. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1037/15969-004Search in Google Scholar

Hopp, Holger. 2018. The bilingual mental lexicon in L2 sentence processing. Second Language 17. 5–27. https://doi.org/10.11431/secondlanguage.17.0_5.Search in Google Scholar

Jacob, Gunnar & Claudia Felser. 2016. Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 69(5). 907–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.984231.Search in Google Scholar

Jeong, Byong-Cheol. 2010. An integrated study of the postposition ‘-ro’ based on simulation model. Korea Semantics 32. 215–243.Search in Google Scholar

Jeong, Su-Jin. 2011. A study on the description methods of the adverbial case postpositions for Korean education based on cognitive linguistics. The Korean Language and Literature 112. 79–110.Search in Google Scholar

Jia, Ruiting & Johanne Paradis. 2015. The use of referring expressions in narratives by Mandarin heritage language children and the role of language environment factors in predicting individual differences. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(4). 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000728.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Nan, Eugenia Novokshanova, Kyoko Masuda & Xin Wang. 2011. Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning 61(3). 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.x.Search in Google Scholar

Jung, Boo Kyung & Gyu-Ho Shin. Use of locative postposition-verb construction in Korean: Analysis of L1-Korean corpora and L2-Korean. Corpora, in press.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Bum Mo & Hong Gyu Kim. 2009. Hankwuke sayong pindo [Usage Frequency of Korean language]. Seoul, Korea: Hankwuk Mwunhwsa.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Yue. 2015. A study on education of Korean postposition ‘e’, ‘eseo’, ‘ro’ for Chinese Korean learners. Seoul: Seoul National University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Jeongeun & Soyoung Lee. 2004. Interlanguage study of Korean learners- about using ‘ul/lul, ik/ka, ey, eyse’-. Bilingual Research 24. 87–108.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Seok Ki. 2011. Education method for the adverb postpositions of ‘ey’, ‘eyse’, ‘lo’ in the Korean language. Kwukhakyenkwulonchong 8. 199–236.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Young-Joo & Jin Guo. 2016. A study on the acquisition of Korean adverbial case marker ey in spoken production by Chinese Korean L2 learners. Kwukekyoyukyenkwu [Korean Education Research] 38. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17313/jkorle.2016..38.1.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Yu-Mi. 2002. A study of error analysis of Korean learners by using learner corpus. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language 27. 141–168.Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher. 2016. Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication. Georgia: Georgia State University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher & Scott Crossley. 2017. Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing 34(4). 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217712554.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Chan-Kyu & Ye-Jin Ko. 2013. The degree of advanced Korean learners’ recognition of postposition. Emwunnoncip [Collection of Language and Literature] 56. 485–511. http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/NODE02341090.Search in Google Scholar

Lee-Ellis, Sunyoung. 2009. The development and validation of a Korean C-test using Rasch analysis. Language Testing 26(2). 245–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208101007.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Ikseop. 2011. Kwukehakkaysel [Introduction to Korean linguistics]. Seoul: Hakyensa.Search in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena. 2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120(11). 2546–2556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.005.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Dong-Hoon. 2017. How to express local concepts in Korean. Journal of Korean Linguistics 82. 101–125. https://doi.org/10.15811/jkl.2017..82.004.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Soojong, Minjung Kwon, Junsu Kim & Hyunki Kim. 2015. Korean proposition bank guidelines for ExoBrain. In Proceeding of the 27th annual conference on human & cognitive language technology, 250–254. Jeonju, South Korea: Human and Language Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei. 2010. Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4). 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison. 2006. Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27(3). 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami051.Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2008. A unified model. In Peter Robinson & Nick Ellis (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 341–371. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Madlener, Karin. 2015. Frequency effects in instructed second language acquisition, 29. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.10.1515/9783110405538Search in Google Scholar

Maeng, Kyung Hum. 2016. Hyentay hankwuke cosa ‘ey’uy inciuymilon [Cognitive understanding of modern Korean postposition ‘ey’]. The Journal of Korean Studies 41. 325–366.Search in Google Scholar

Nam, Ki Sim. 1993. Kwuke cosauy yenkwu: ‘ey’wa ‘ro’lul cwungsimulo [Study on Korean postpositions: Focused on ‘ey’ and ‘lo’]. Seoul: Pakiceng.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Jungyeul, Jeen-Pyo Hong & Jeong-Won Cha. 2016. Korean language resources for everyone. In Proceedings of the 30th Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation: Oral papers, 49–58. Seoul, South Korea. https://aclanthology.org/Y16-2002/.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Sun Hee & Hyunwoo Kim. 2021. Cross-linguistic influence in the second language processing of Korean morphological and syntactic causative constructions. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 12. 687–713. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20026.par.Search in Google Scholar

Pozzan, Lucia & John Trueswell. 2016. Second language processing and revision of garden-path sentences: A visual word study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(3). 636–643. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000838.Search in Google Scholar

Robenalt, Clarice & Adele Goldberg. 2016. Nonnative speakers do not take competing alternative expressions into account the way native speakers do. Language Learning 66(1). 60–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12149.Search in Google Scholar

Romain, Laurence. 2022. Putting the argument back into argument structure constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 33(1). 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0021.Search in Google Scholar

Römer, Ute. 2004. Comparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. In Guy Aston, Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Steward (eds.), Corpora and language learners, 151–168. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub.10.1075/scl.17.12romSearch in Google Scholar

Salor, Özgül, Bryan Pellom, Tolga Çiloglu & Mübeccel Demirekler. 2007. Turkish speech corpora and recognition tools developed by porting SONIC: Towards multilingual speech recognition. Computer Speech & Language 21(4). 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2007.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard (ed.). 1995. Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Search in Google Scholar

Shin, Gyu-Ho & Boo Kyung Jung. 2021a. Automatic analysis of passive constructions in Korean: Written production by Mandarin-speaking learners of Korean. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7(1). 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20002.shi.Search in Google Scholar

Shin, Gyu-Ho & Boo Kyung Jung. 2021b. Input-output relation in second language acquisition: Textbook and learner writing for adult English-speaking beginners of Korean. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.20049.shi.Search in Google Scholar

Shin, Ji-Young, Ashley Velázquez, Aleksandra Swatek, Shelley Staples & Scott Partridge. 2018. Examining the effectiveness of corpus-informed instruction of reporting verbs in L2 first-year college writing. L2 Journal 10(3). 31–46. https://doi.org/10.5070/L210337022.Search in Google Scholar

Slabakova, Roumyana. 2014. The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 46(4). 543–559.Search in Google Scholar

Sohn, Ho-Min. 1999. The Korean language. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Song, Jae Jung. 2005. The Korean language: Structure, use and context. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203390825Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2011. Constructional preemption by contextual mismatch: A corpus-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Linguistics 22(1). 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.005.Search in Google Scholar

Straka, Milan, Jan Hajič & Jana Straková. 2016. UDPipe: Trainable pipeline for processing CoNLL-U files performing tokenization, morphological analysis, POS tagging and parsing. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC 2016). Portorož, Slovenia: European Language Resources Association.Search in Google Scholar

Tachihara, Karina & Adele Goldberg. 2020. Reduced competition effects and noisier representations in a second language. Language Learning 70(1). 219–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12375.Search in Google Scholar

Theakston, Anna. 2004. The role of entrenchment in children’s and adults’ performance on grammaticality judgment tasks. Cognitive Development 19(1). 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tono, Yukio. 2004. Multiple comparisons of IL, L1 and TL corpora: The case of L2 acquisition of verb subcategorization patterns by Japanese learners of English. In Guy Aston, Silvia Bernardini & Dominic Stewart (eds.), Corpora and language learners, 45–66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/scl.17.05tonSearch in Google Scholar

Zipf, George. 1935. The psyhco-biology of language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar