Home Muga (Antheraea assamensis) silk electrospun scaffold for biomedical applications
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Muga (Antheraea assamensis) silk electrospun scaffold for biomedical applications

  • Subramanian Sundaramoorthy ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Karthic Kumar Balan , Saravanan Ramaiyan Alwar , I. Caraline , S. Gowri and S. Kavitha
Published/Copyright: July 31, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Wild silk varieties are less explored in the field of biomaterials than cultivated mulberry silk (Bombyx Mori). In the present work, an electrospun scaffold was produced from wild silk, muga (Antheraea assamensis), and it was assessed for the properties required for biomaterials. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that the electrospun fibers were formed without beads, and the majority of the fibers had diameters in the range of 500–900 nm. The scaffold started to decompose at 210 °C, which is higher than the temperature used for sterilization of the scaffold. The PBS uptake percentage was found to be 400 %, which is sufficient for the absorption of the medium used during cell culture. The scaffold had a hemolysis value of less than 5 %, which indicates that the scaffold exhibits good blood compatibility. The MTT assay showed cell viability of more than 80 % after 24 h and 48 h, and fluorescence microscopy showed that cells adhered and spread on the surface of the scaffold. The results show that muga silk electrospun mat can be used as an ideal biomaterial.


Corresponding author: Subramanian Sundaramoorthy, Department of Textile Technology, Anna University, Chennai, India, E-mail: 

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Contributon of authors: Subramanian Sundaramoorthy – Conceptualization, Design of experiment, interpretation of results, guidance in manuscript preparation Karthic KumarBalan – Interpretation of results, manuscript preparation Saravanan Ramaiyan Alwar – manuscript preparation Caraline I – Conducting experiment and analyzis Gowri S – Conducting experiment and analyzis Kavitha S – Conducting experiment and analyzis.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no competing interests.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Kar, S.; Talukdar, S.; Pal, S.; Nayak, S.; Paranjape, P.; Kundu, S. C. Silk Gland Fibroin from Indian Muga Silkworm Antheraea Assama as Potential Biomaterial. Tissue Eng. Regener. Med. 2013, 10, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-012-0008-6.Search in Google Scholar

2. Stoppel, W. L.; Raia, N.; Kimmerling, E.; Wang, S.; Ghezzi, C. E.; Kaplan, D. L. Silk Biomaterials. In Comprehensive Biomaterials II; Ducheyne, P.; Healy, K.; Hutmacher, D. W.; Grainger, D. W.; Kirkpatrick, C. J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2017; pp. 253–278.10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10247-4Search in Google Scholar

3. Jasmine, S.; Mandal, B. B. Types and Properties of Non-mulberry Silk Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications. In Silk Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine; Kundu, S. C., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing, 2014; pp. 275–298.10.1533/9780857097064.2.275Search in Google Scholar

4. Bhardwaj, N.; Rajkhowa, R.; Wang, X.; Devi, D. Milled Non-mulberry Silk Fibroin Microparticles as Biomaterial for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81C, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.049.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Chen, J. P.; Chen, S. H.; Lai, G. J. Preparation and Characterization of Biomimetic Silk Fibroin/chitosan Composite Nanofibers by Electrospinning for Osteoblasts Culture. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276x-7-170.Search in Google Scholar

6. Muthumanickkam, A.; Subramanian, S. Studies on Electrospun Eri Silk Fibroin Scaffold for Biomedical Applications. Ph.D. Thesis; Anna University: India, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

7. Muthumanickkam, A.; Subramanian, S.; Goweri, M.; Beaula, W. S.; Ganesh, V. Iran. Polym. J. 2013, 22, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-012-0113-3.Search in Google Scholar

8. Srivastava, C. M.; Purwar, R. Fabrication of Robust Antheraea Assama Fibroin Nanofibrous Mat Using Ionic Liquid for Skin Tissue Engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng.: C 2016, 68, 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Bhardwaj, N.; Singh, Y. P.; Devi, D.; Kandimalla, R.; Kotoky, J.; Mandal, B. B. Potential of Silk Fibroin/chondrocyte Constructs of Muga Silkworm Antheraea Assamensis for Cartilage Tissue Engineering. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 3670–3684. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tb00717a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Kundu, B.; Kundu, S. C. Bio-inspired Fabrication of Fibroin Cryogels from the Muga Silkworm Antheraea Assamensis for Liver Tissue Engineering. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/8/5/055003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Kasoju, N.; Bora, U. Antheraea Assama Silk Fibroin-Based Functional Scaffold with Enhanced Blood Compatibility for Tissue Engineering Applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2010, 12, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200980055.Search in Google Scholar

12. Terzioğlu, P. Electrospun Chitosan/Gelatin/Nano-CaCO3 Hybrid Nanofibers for Potential Tissue Engineering Applications. J. Nat. Fibers 2021, 18, 1207–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1870639.Search in Google Scholar

13. Rezaie, M.; Nemati, N. H.; Mehrabani, D.; Komeili, A. Skin Regeneration by Hybrid Carboxyl Methyl Cellulose/Calcium Alginate Fibers Electrospun Scaffold. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19, 10723–10736. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.2002764.Search in Google Scholar

14. Higuchi, A.; Ling, Q. D.; Chang, Y.; Hsu, S. T.; Umezawa, A. Physical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Stem Cell Differentiation Fate. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3297–3328. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300426x.Search in Google Scholar

15. Singh, B. N.; Panda, N. N.; Mund, R.; Pramanik, K. Carboxymethyl Cellulose Enables Silk Fibroin Nanofibrous Scaffold with Enhanced Biomimetic Potential for Bone Tissue Engineering Application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 20, 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.088.Search in Google Scholar

16. Rajkhowa, R.; Wang, L.; Kanwar, J. R.; Wang, X. Molecular Weight and Secondary Structure Change in Eri Silk during Alkali Degumming and Powdering. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 119, 1339–1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.31981.Search in Google Scholar

17. Simchuer, W.; Phromnut, N.; Intarasorn, S.; Srihanam, P. The Properties of Eri (Samia Ricini) Silk Fibroin Fibers: Effect of Different Organic Solvents. Int. J. Appl. Chem. 2010, 6, 373–382.Search in Google Scholar

18. Freddi, G.; Pessina, G.; Tsukada, M. Swelling and Dissolution of Silk Fibroin (Bombyx mori) in N-Methyl Morpholine N-Oxide. J. Biol. Macromol. 1999, 24, 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-8130(98)00087-7.Search in Google Scholar

19. Freddi, G.; Tsukada, M.; Berett, S. Structure and Physical Properties of Silk Fibroin/polyacrylamide Blend Films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1999, 71, 1563–1571. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19990307)71:10<1563::aid-app4>3.0.co;2-e.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990307)71:10<1563::AID-APP4>3.0.CO;2-ESearch in Google Scholar

20. Viswanathan, P.; Ondeck, M. G.; Chirasatitsin, S.; Ngamkham, K.; Reilly, G. C.; Engler, B. G. 3D Surface Topology Guides Stem Cell Adhesion and Differentiation. Biomaterials 2015, 52, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.034.Search in Google Scholar

21. Discher, D. E.; Janmey, P.; Wang, Y. L. Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate. Science 2005, 310, 1139–1143. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116995.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-05
Accepted: 2024-02-29
Published Online: 2024-07-31
Published in Print: 2024-08-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2023-0269/html
Scroll to top button