Home Growth of CuO nanoparticles using one step chemical bath deposition under microwave heating and their characterizations
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Growth of CuO nanoparticles using one step chemical bath deposition under microwave heating and their characterizations

  • Ravi Shankar Rai EMAIL logo and Vivek Bajpai
Published/Copyright: April 5, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Varied morphologies of crystalline copper oxide nanoparticles were synthesized using one step chemical bath deposition under microwave heating of prepared growth solution at 1200 W microwave power for a very short duration of 2–8 min. The structure and crystallinity of the as grown copper oxide nanoparticles were studied by wide angle X-ray diffractometer analysis. The particle size values obtained from Scherrer’s relation and the Williamson–Hall plot methods are in the 16–18 nm range. The approximate size of as grown copper oxide nanoparticles evaluated from field emission scanning electron microscopic images are in the range of approximately 15–20 nm. The presence of copper and oxygen was verified by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis. Their weight % and atomic % exhibits the rich amount of development of copper oxide nanoparticles in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio. The optical properties of as grown copper oxide nanoparticles were examined by assessing absorption spectra of the sample in ultraviolet–visible range. The significant peak of absorption spectra is seen near 340 nm wavelength which explains the mono-dispersion behaviour of nanoparticles. Evaluation of Urbach energy of copper oxide nanoparticles reveals that the nanomaterial has microstructural lattice disorder. These characterizations of as synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles explain the feasibility and potential of such nanomaterial to be incorporated in a wide range of utilities.


Corresponding author: Ravi Shankar Rai, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Jharkhand 826004, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work has not been funded in any way to perform research activities.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Gunalan, S., Sivaraj, R., Venckatesh, R. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 97, 1140–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2012.07.096.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Chaudhary, S., Rohilla, D., Umar, A., Kaur, N., Shanavas, A. Ceram. Int. 2019, 47, 15025–15035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.239.Search in Google Scholar

3. Amalraj, S., Michael, P. A. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102797.Search in Google Scholar

4. Nayak, R., Ali, F. A., Mishra, D. K., Ray, D., Aswal, V. K., Sahoo, S. K., Nanda, B. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 11045–11059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.100.Search in Google Scholar

5. Zhang, Q., Zhang, K., Xu, D., Yang, G., Huang, H., Nie, F., Liu, C., Yang, S. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 60, 208–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

6. Cai, Y., Yang, F., Wu, L., Shu, Y., Qu, G., Fakhri, A., Gupta, V. K. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 258, 123919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123919.Search in Google Scholar

7. Rai, R. S., Bajpai, V. Adv. Nano Res. 2021, 11, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.12989/anr.2021.11.1.037.Search in Google Scholar

8. Mansournia, M., Ghaderi, L. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 691, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.267.Search in Google Scholar

9. Yang, C., Su, X., Wang, J., Cao, X., Wang, S., Zhang, L. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2013, 185, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.04.100.Search in Google Scholar

10. Xu, C., Manukyan, K. V., Adams, R. A., Pol, V. G., Chen, P., Varma, A. Carbon 2019, 142, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.016.Search in Google Scholar

11. Grigore, M. E., Biscu, E. R., Holban, A. M., Gestal, M. C., Grumezescu, A. M. Pharmaceuticals 2016, 9, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph9040075.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Rai, R. S., Bajpai, V. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 8208–8217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.180.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kong, K., Deka, B. K., Seo, J. W., Park, Y. B., Park, H. W. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 78, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.003.Search in Google Scholar

14. Dar, M. A., Ahsanulhaq, Q., Kim, Y. S., Sohn, J. M., Kim, W. B., Shin, H. S. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 6279–6284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

15. Kumar, D., Rai, R. S., Singh, N. K. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 26216–26220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.009.Search in Google Scholar

16. Rai, R. S., Bajpai, V. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.356.Search in Google Scholar

17. Chikan, V., McLaurin, E. J. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6050085.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Zhong, G., Xu, S., Chen, C., Kline, D. J., Giroux, M., Pei, Y., Jiao, M., Liu, D., Mi, R., Xie, H., Yang, B., Wang, C., Zachariah, M. R., Hu, L. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904282. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201904282.Search in Google Scholar

19. Wojnarowicz, J., Chudoba, T., Lojkowski, W. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1086. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10061086.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Mohammadi, E., Aliofkhazraei, M., Hasanpoor, M., Chipara, M. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2018, 43, 475–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2017.1397501.Search in Google Scholar

21. Horikoshi, S., Serpone, N. Chem. Rec. 2019, 19, 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.201800062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Kannan, K., Radhika, D., Vijayalakshmi, S., Sadasivuni, K. K., Ojiaku, A. A., Verma, U. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 102, 1095–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2020.1733543.Search in Google Scholar

23. Ren, G., Hu, D., Cheng, E. W. C., Vargas-Reus, M. A., Reip, P., Allaker, R. P. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33, 587–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.12.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Waris, A., Din, M., Ali, A., Ali, M., Afridi, S., Baset, A., Ullah Khan, A. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 123, 108369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2020.108369.Search in Google Scholar

25. Guzman, M., Arcos, M., Dille, J., Rousse, C., Godet, S., Malet, L. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 18576–18590. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00818.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Verma, N., Kumar, N. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 1170–1188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01092.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Singh, J., Kaur, G., Rawat, M. J. Bioelectron. Nanotechnol. 2016, 1, 9. https://doi.org/10.13188/2475-224x.1000003.Search in Google Scholar

28. Ocakoglu, K., Mansour, S. A., Yildirimcan, S., Al-Ghamdi, A. A., El-Tantawy, F., Yakuphanoglu, F. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 148, 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2015.03.106.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Viezbicke, B. D., Patel, S., Davis, B. E., Birnie, D. P. Phys. Status Solidi Basic Res. 2015, 252, 1700–1710. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201552007.Search in Google Scholar

30. Kumar, V. V. S., Kanjilal, D. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018, 81, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

31. Bougrine, A., El Hichou, A., Addou, M., Ebothé, J., Kachouane, A., Troyon, M. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2003, 80, 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00505-9.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-02-02
Accepted: 2022-12-14
Published Online: 2023-04-05
Published in Print: 2023-04-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Editorial ICPCM 2021
  4. Original Papers
  5. Developing easy-to-use, cost-effective wound dressing material by coating commercial cotton bandages with nanomaterials
  6. Temperature and magnetic field controlled dielectric relaxation and magnetodielectric response in KBiFe1.9Co0.1O5 polycrystalline
  7. Influence of thermo-mechanical treatment in austenitic and ferritic field condition on microstructural and mechanical properties of reduced activation ferritic-martensitic steel
  8. Effect of nanoparticle on mechanical properties of activated tungsten gas welding of austenite stainless steel 316L and optimization of process parameters
  9. Flexural behavior of carbon/glass inter-ply hybrid FRP composites under elevated temperature environments
  10. Surfactant assisted single step electrodeposition of CuInSe2 thin films with rich indium selenide surface over layer
  11. Optimization of hot rolling parameters of CRNO steel with the aid of hot compression test and deformation map
  12. Reduced graphene oxide synthesis by dry planetary ball milling followed by arc plasma treatment of high pure graphite
  13. Influence of interphase characteristics on the elastic modulus of unidirectional glass-reinforced epoxy composites: a computational micromechanics study
  14. Investigation of dielectric, impedance, and magnetodielectric behavior in Bi5Ti3FeO15–Bi2Fe4O9 composites prepared by sol–gel modified method
  15. Effect of spheroidization annealing on low cycle fatigue (LCF) characteristics of cold forged steel components
  16. Growth of CuO nanoparticles using one step chemical bath deposition under microwave heating and their characterizations
  17. Phase formation and electrical properties study of PVDF thick films synthesized by solution casting method
  18. Generation of microchannels on PMMA using an in-house fabricated μ-ECDM system
  19. Temperature dependent constitutive plastic flow behaviour of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V
  20. Production and characterization of Al–Cu binary alloy produced by using novel continuous casting process
  21. Synthesis of Al–Sn alloys by direct chill casting under the effect of mechanical stirring: an experimental and simulation optimization study
  22. Evaluation of characteristics for microwave-assisted polymer coating of the steel substrate
  23. Synthesis and fabrication of acrylic acid treated rattan fiber epoxy composite
  24. Development of superhydrophobic hybrid silica-cellulose aerogel as promising thermal insulation and sound absorption
  25. Effect of thermal annealing on structure and magnetic properties in a Ni–Cr multilayer
  26. Effect of heat input on corrosion behavior of automotive zinc-coated steel joint
  27. Development of Al–SiC–TiO2 hybrid composite using powder metallurgy route and the influence of TiO2 content variation on microstructure and mechanical properties
  28. News
  29. DGM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2022-0043/html
Scroll to top button