Home Influence of interphase characteristics on the elastic modulus of unidirectional glass-reinforced epoxy composites: a computational micromechanics study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Influence of interphase characteristics on the elastic modulus of unidirectional glass-reinforced epoxy composites: a computational micromechanics study

  • Shubham EMAIL logo , Rajesh Kumar Prusty and Bankim Chandra Ray
Published/Copyright: April 12, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article briefly discusses the role of interphase in the elastic moduli of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials. For this unidirectional glass fiber was chosen as reinforcement, and epoxy was selected as the matrix. A hexagonally packed representative volume element is used for the micromechanical analysis. Experimental validation was initially used to verify the accuracy of the established equations of the rule of mixing, Composite Cylinder Assemblage, Chamis, Halpin and Tsai, and Puck. The Chamis equation was found to be the most reasonable. Then the finite element approach in which interphase has been included was used to estimate the elastic moduli. The finite element model without interphase and the experimental result were taken as a reference. The influence of interface ratio and property of interphase on the homogenised elastic properties of the unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer composites is analysed. A micromechanics plugin in Abaqus software was used to estimate the density and Young’s modulus of the unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer composites. The interphase properties are varied, having 6.25%, 12.5%, 25% and 50% influence of the fiber phase and the remaining influence of the matrix phase with interface ratios of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3. The interface ratio of 0.3, having 6.25% fiber phase influence, gave the most reasonable moduli values (with an error <10%) compared to the mean experimental moduli. The study showed interface ratio and interphase properties to critically influence the overall elastic property of the unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer composites.


Corresponding author: Shubham, FRP Composite Laboratory, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela 769008, India, E-mail:

Funding source: National Institute of Technology Rourkela

Award Identifier / Grant number: Unassigned

Acknowledgements

The technical assistance of Mr. Rajesh Patnaik was also greatly appreciated.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The authors are grateful to the National Institute of Technology Rourkela in India for their financial and infrastructural support for this project.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Shubham, Yerramalli, C. S., Sumant, C., Prusty, R. K., Ray, B. C. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2022, 167, 104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104262.Search in Google Scholar

2. Kam, C. Z., Kueh, A. B. H. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, e350890. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/350890.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Shubham, Prusty, R. K., Ray, B. C. Polym. Sci., Ser. B 2022, 64, 553–566. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560090422700166.Search in Google Scholar

4. Song, D., Li, Y., Zhang, K., Cheng, H., Liu, P., Hu, J. Mater. Des. 2016, 89, 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.118.Search in Google Scholar

5. Michaeli, W., Preller, F. Int. J. Mater. Res. 2012, 103, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.3139/146.110634.Search in Google Scholar

6. Abo Sabah, S. H., Kueh, A. B. H. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, e954070. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/954070.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Singh, D. K., Vaidya, A., Thomas, V., Theodore, M., Kore, S., Vaidya, U. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs4020058.Search in Google Scholar

8. Verma, D., Exner, M., Tomar, V. Mater. Des. 2016, 112, 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.068.Search in Google Scholar

9. Yang, B., Kozey, V., Adanur, S., Kumar, S. Compos. Part B 2000, 31, 715–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00052-9.Search in Google Scholar

10. Karger-Kocsis, J., Mahmood, H., Pegoretti, A. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 73, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

11. Zhao, F. M., Takeda, N. Compos. Part A 2000, 31, 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00085-3.Search in Google Scholar

12. Daniel, I. M., Ishai, O. Engineering Mechanics of Composite Materials; Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

13. Thomason, J. L., Adzima, L. J. Compos. Part A 2001, 32, 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00124-X.Search in Google Scholar

14. Hashin, Z. J. Appl. Mech. 1983, 50, 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3167081.Search in Google Scholar

15. Chamis, C. C. Simplified Composite Micromechanics Equations for Hygral, Thermal and Mechanical Properties, In Ann. Conf. of the Society of the Plastics Industry (SPI) Reinforced Plastics/Composites Inst.; NASA-TM-83320, Houston, Texas, no. 10, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

16. Whitney, J. M., McCullough, R. L., Carlsson, L. A. Delaware Composites Design Encyc: Micromechanical Materials Model, Vol. II. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

17. Olthoff, J. Rekenprogramma's voor het ontwerpen en dimensioneren van vezelversterkte kunststoffen; NLR Technical Publication TP 91050 U: Netherland, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

18. Krishnan, P.,Mechanical and Physical Testing of Biocomposites, Fibre-Reinforced Composites and Hybrid Composites; Jawaid, M., Thariq, M., Saba, N., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, 2019, pp. 343–385.10.1016/B978-0-08-102292-4.00018-7Search in Google Scholar

19. Yue, C. Y., Cheung, W. L. J. Mater. Sci. 1991, 26, 870–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00576762.Search in Google Scholar

20. Hodzic, A., Stachurski, Z. H., Kim, J. K. Polymer 2000, 41, 6895–6905. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00890-3.Search in Google Scholar

21. Kim, J. K., Mai, Y. W. Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1998.10.1016/B978-008042695-2/50001-4Search in Google Scholar

22. Jones, F. R. Key Eng. Mater. 1996, 116–117, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.116-117.41.Search in Google Scholar

23. Lagache, M., Agbossou, A., Pastor, J., Muller, D. J. Compos. Mater. 1994, 28, 1140–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839402801205.Search in Google Scholar

24. Börgesson, L. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering; Stephansson, O., Jing, L., Tsang, C. F., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 565–570.10.1016/S0165-1250(96)80047-2Search in Google Scholar

25. Kumar, D. S., Shukla, M. J., Mahato, K. K., Rathore, D. K., Prusty, R. K., Ray, B. C. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 75, 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/75/1/012012.Search in Google Scholar

26. Noor, A. K., Shah, R. S. Compos. Struct. 1993, 26, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(93)90040-W.Search in Google Scholar

27. Karami, G., Garnich, M. Compos. Part B 2005, 36, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.09.005.Search in Google Scholar

28. Li, Y., Li, W., Tao, Y., Shao, J., Deng, Y., Kou, H., Zhang, X., Chen, L. Compos. Part B 2019, 161, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.056.Search in Google Scholar

29. Shubham, Prusty, R. K., Ray, B. C., Chandra Ray, B. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 27, 2640–2644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.082.Search in Google Scholar

30. R. Akkerman. Compos. Part B 2002, 33, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00002-1.Search in Google Scholar

31. Atkinson, K. E. An Introduction to Numerical Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

32. Bowles, D. E., Tompkins, S. S. J. Compos. Mater. 1989, 23, 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838902300405.Search in Google Scholar

33. Affdl, J. C. H., Kardos, J. L. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1976, 16, 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760160512.Search in Google Scholar

34. Spencer, A. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1986, 27, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(86)90066-7.Search in Google Scholar

35. Manera, M. J. Compos. Mater. 1977, 11, 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199837701100208.Search in Google Scholar

36. Knops, M. Analysis of Failure in Fiber Polymer Laminates: The Theory of Alfred Puck; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Heidelberg 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-28
Accepted: 2022-07-29
Published Online: 2023-04-12
Published in Print: 2023-04-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Editorial ICPCM 2021
  4. Original Papers
  5. Developing easy-to-use, cost-effective wound dressing material by coating commercial cotton bandages with nanomaterials
  6. Temperature and magnetic field controlled dielectric relaxation and magnetodielectric response in KBiFe1.9Co0.1O5 polycrystalline
  7. Influence of thermo-mechanical treatment in austenitic and ferritic field condition on microstructural and mechanical properties of reduced activation ferritic-martensitic steel
  8. Effect of nanoparticle on mechanical properties of activated tungsten gas welding of austenite stainless steel 316L and optimization of process parameters
  9. Flexural behavior of carbon/glass inter-ply hybrid FRP composites under elevated temperature environments
  10. Surfactant assisted single step electrodeposition of CuInSe2 thin films with rich indium selenide surface over layer
  11. Optimization of hot rolling parameters of CRNO steel with the aid of hot compression test and deformation map
  12. Reduced graphene oxide synthesis by dry planetary ball milling followed by arc plasma treatment of high pure graphite
  13. Influence of interphase characteristics on the elastic modulus of unidirectional glass-reinforced epoxy composites: a computational micromechanics study
  14. Investigation of dielectric, impedance, and magnetodielectric behavior in Bi5Ti3FeO15–Bi2Fe4O9 composites prepared by sol–gel modified method
  15. Effect of spheroidization annealing on low cycle fatigue (LCF) characteristics of cold forged steel components
  16. Growth of CuO nanoparticles using one step chemical bath deposition under microwave heating and their characterizations
  17. Phase formation and electrical properties study of PVDF thick films synthesized by solution casting method
  18. Generation of microchannels on PMMA using an in-house fabricated μ-ECDM system
  19. Temperature dependent constitutive plastic flow behaviour of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V
  20. Production and characterization of Al–Cu binary alloy produced by using novel continuous casting process
  21. Synthesis of Al–Sn alloys by direct chill casting under the effect of mechanical stirring: an experimental and simulation optimization study
  22. Evaluation of characteristics for microwave-assisted polymer coating of the steel substrate
  23. Synthesis and fabrication of acrylic acid treated rattan fiber epoxy composite
  24. Development of superhydrophobic hybrid silica-cellulose aerogel as promising thermal insulation and sound absorption
  25. Effect of thermal annealing on structure and magnetic properties in a Ni–Cr multilayer
  26. Effect of heat input on corrosion behavior of automotive zinc-coated steel joint
  27. Development of Al–SiC–TiO2 hybrid composite using powder metallurgy route and the influence of TiO2 content variation on microstructure and mechanical properties
  28. News
  29. DGM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2022-0032/html
Scroll to top button