Startseite “I am surprised they have allowed you in here to do this”: women’s prison writing as heterotopic space of narrative inclusion
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

“I am surprised they have allowed you in here to do this”: women’s prison writing as heterotopic space of narrative inclusion

  • Rosalchen Whitecross

    Dr. Rosalchen Whitecross is a Senior Lecturer in Criminology at Bath Spa University. Her interdisciplinary research draws on the fields of cultural criminology, narrative and literary theory, and cultural studies to creatively explore and critically engage with women’s prison writing as narratives of lived experience.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. März 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The focus of this paper is the hidden world of women’s imprisonment as revealed in their writing produced in creative writing workshops. Proceeding from the perspective of narrative inquiry as a methodology to study lived experience, this study explores the juxtaposed spaces of the closed, exclusionary carceral world and the open, creative space of the writing workshop. Here we come to find the personal, situated within the wider carceral institution, in the marginalised voices of women in prison, writing their stories in their own words. The prison environment is seldom envisaged as a space that promotes literacy, education, the arts or creativity. This paper takes a relational perspective of creative writing workshops as a space which enables and facilitates prison writing, becoming a bridge between the enclosed prison space and the world outside. Following Foucault (1986. Of other spaces. Translated by Jay Miskowiec. Diacrities 16(1). 22-27) the creative writing workshop and the textual space of writing may be seen as heterotopic spaces of play, empathy and inclusion that reflect the prison in the language of marginalisation. It gives the opportunity to women in prison to write about their inner lifeworld as a process to bear witness to their experience and work through the trauma of imprisonment. This writing in the textual space becomes a reflection of the repressive heterotopic space of prison and serves as a counter-narrative to the master narrative of punishment and prison. Therefore, whilst the writers in prison reach out to poetic and creative techniques to capture colours, metaphors and genres such as the fairy tale, the reader is constantly confronted by the harsh reality of their lived experience of confinement and their lives pre-imprisonment.


Corresponding author: Rosalchen Whitecross, Criminology – School of Sciences, 1554 Bath Spa University , Newton Park Campus, Newton St Loe, Bath, BA2 9BN, UK, E-mail:

About the author

Rosalchen Whitecross

Dr. Rosalchen Whitecross is a Senior Lecturer in Criminology at Bath Spa University. Her interdisciplinary research draws on the fields of cultural criminology, narrative and literary theory, and cultural studies to creatively explore and critically engage with women’s prison writing as narratives of lived experience.

References

Aitken, Dominic. 2022. Investigating prison suicides: The politics of independent oversight. Punishment & Society 24(3). 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474521993002.Suche in Google Scholar

Albutt, Andrea. 2023. All party parliamentary group on penal affairs address. In Bulletin, vol. 859. Prison Governors Association. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/crimeandjustice.org.uk/files/Bulletin-859.pdf (accessed 30 May 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Appleman, Deborah. 2013. Teaching in the dark – the promise and pedagogy of creative writing in prison. English Journal 102(4). 24–30. https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201323332.Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Bernadette. 1999. What is voice? Issues of identity and representation in framing of reviews. Review of Educational Research 69(4). 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170770.Suche in Google Scholar

Banaji, Shakuntala. 2011. Mapping the rhetoric of creativity. In Julian Sefton-Green, Pat Thomson, Ken Jones & Liora Bresler (eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning, 36–44. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Campbell, Joseph. 2008. The hero with a thousand faces, 3rd edn. Novato: New World Library.Suche in Google Scholar

Carlen, Pat & Tchaikovsky, Chris. 1996. Women’s imprisonment in England at the end of the twentieth century: Legitimacy, realities and utopias. In Roger Matthews & Peter Francis (eds.), Prisons 2000: An international perspective on the current state and future of imprisonment. New York: St Martin’s Press.10.1007/978-1-349-24559-8_11Suche in Google Scholar

Clandinin, D. Jean. 2006. Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived experience. Research Studies in Music Education 27. 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103x060270010301.Suche in Google Scholar

Clandinin, D. Jean & F. Michael Connelly. 2000. Narrative inquiry – experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Suche in Google Scholar

Coles, Deborah, Roberts Rebecca & Cavcav Selen. 2018. Still dying on the inside – Examining deaths in women’s prisons (PDF). https://www.inquest.org.uk/Handlers/Download.ashx?IDMF=8d39dc1d-02f7-48eb-b9ac-2c063d01656a (accessed 1 July 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Crewe, Ben & Alison Liebling. 2017. Reconfiguring penal power. In Alison Liebling, Shadd Maruna & Lesley McAra (eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology, 889–913, 6th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/he/9780198719441.003.0040Suche in Google Scholar

Crewe, Ben, Susie Hulley & Serena Wright. 2017. The gendered pains of life imprisonment. British Journal of Criminology 57(6). 1359–1378.10.1093/bjc/azw088Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, Amanda. 2004. On teaching women’s prison writing: A feminist approach to women, crime, and incarceration. Women’s Studies Quarterly - Women, Crime, and the Criminal Justice System 32(3/4). 261–279.Suche in Google Scholar

Elbow, Peter. 2000. Everyone can write – essays toward a hopeful theory of writing and teaching writing. New York and London: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195104158.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of prison. Translated by Allan Sheridan. London: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1986. Of other spaces. Translated by Jay Miskowiec. Diacrities 16(1). 22-27, https://doi.org/10.2307/464648.Suche in Google Scholar

Godbee, Beth. 2012. Toward explaining the transformative power of talk about, around and for writing. Research in the Teaching of English 47(2). 171–197. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201221826.Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Natalie. 1991. Wild mind – living the writer’s life. London: Rider (imprint of Ebury Press).Suche in Google Scholar

Haarhoff, Dorian. 1998. The writer’s voice – a workbook for writers in Africa. Johannesburg: Zebra Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Herman, Judith. 1997. Trauma and recovery, the aftermath of violence – from domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

HM Inspectorate of Prisons. 2023. Report on an unannounced inspection of HMP/YOI Eastwood Park by HM Chief Inspector of prisons: 17–28 October 2022. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2023/02/Eastwood-Park-web-2022.pdf (accessed 13 April 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Howard League for Penal Reform. 2017. Why the system is broken. http://howardleague.org/why-the-system-is-broken/ (accessed 10 July 2017).Suche in Google Scholar

Hunt, Celia. 2013. Transformative learning through creative life writing – Exploring the self in the learning process. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203818138Suche in Google Scholar

Hunt, Celia & Fiona Sampson. 2006. Writing – self and reflexivity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-20460-7Suche in Google Scholar

INQUEST. 2020. New government figures show record levels of self-harm and high numbers of deaths in prison. https://www.inquest.org.uk/moj-stats-april-2020 (accessed 13 December 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Jewkes, Yvonne, Slee, Eleanor & Moran, Dominique. 2017. The visual retreat of the prison: Non-places for non-people. In Michelle Brown & Eamonn Carrabine (eds.), Routledge International Handbook of visual criminology, 293–304. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315713281-23Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Peter. 2006. Unravelling Foucault’s ‘different spaces. History of the Human Sciences 19(3). 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695106069669.Suche in Google Scholar

Jose-Kampfner, Christina. 1990. Coming to terms with existential death: An analysis of women’s adaptation to life in prison. Social Justice 17(2). 110–125.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendig, Diane. 1994. It is ourselves that we remake: Teaching creative writing in prison. In Wendy Bishop & Hans Ostrom (eds.), Colors of a different horse: Rethinking creative writing theory and pedagogy, 158–166. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Suche in Google Scholar

Knight, Kelvin T. 2017. Placeless places: Resolving the paradox of Foucault’s heterotopia. Textual Practice 31(1). 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2016.1156151.Suche in Google Scholar

Lawston, Jodie Michele. 2011. From representations to resistance: How the razor wire binds us. In Jodie Michele Lawston & Ashley E. Lucas, (eds.), Razor Wire women: Prisoners, activists, scholars and artists, 1–18. Albany: State University of New York Press.10.1353/book1899Suche in Google Scholar

Lorde, Audre. 1984. Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Freedom, CA 95019: The Crossing Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lowrie, Joyce O. 2008. Sightings: Mirror in texts – texts in mirrors. Amsterdam: BRILL.10.1163/9789401206563Suche in Google Scholar

Lucas, Ashley E. 2011. Historical contextualization. In Jodie Michele Lawston & Ashley E. Lucas, (eds.), Razor wire women: Prisoners, activists, scholars and artists, 193–197. Albany: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Malloch, Margaret & McIvor, Gill (eds.). 2013. Women, punishment and social justice: Human rights and penal practices. Routledge: London.10.4324/9780203084755Suche in Google Scholar

Melossi, Dario. 2001. The cultural embeddedness of social control: Reflections on the comparisons of Italian and North American cultures concerning punishment. Theoretical Criminology 5(4). 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480601005004001.Suche in Google Scholar

Michalski, Joseph H. 2019. The challenge of redefining the imprisoned self as an artist: The pedagogical rituals of a prison arts instructor. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 58(1). 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12291.Suche in Google Scholar

Muldoon, Mark. 2002. On Ricoeur. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Inc.Suche in Google Scholar

Mullen, Carol A. 1999. Reaching inside out: Arts-based educational programming for incarcerated women. Studies in Art Education – A Journal of Issues and Research 40(2). 143–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320338.Suche in Google Scholar

Murdock, Maureen. 2020. The Heroine’s journey – woman’s Quest for Wholeness. Boulder: Shambala.Suche in Google Scholar

Narayan, Kiran. 2012. Alive in the writing: Crafting Ethnography in the Company of Chekhov. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226567921.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

O’Neill, Maggie, Susan Mansaray & Janice Haaken. 2017. Women’s lives, well-being and community. International Review of Qualitative Research 10(2). 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2017.10.2.211.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Neill, Maggie & Lizzie Seal. 2019. Imaginative criminology – of spaces past, present and future. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Player, Elaine. 2014. Women in the criminal justice system: The triumph of inertia. Criminology and Criminal Justice 14(3). 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895813495218.Suche in Google Scholar

Pope, Olivia & Sa-ardyen Phiset. 2021. Global prison trends 2021 – Special focus prisons in crises, penal reform international and Thailand institute of justice. https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Global-prison-trends-2021.pdf (accessed 20 March 2022).Suche in Google Scholar

Rankin, Jenny. 2002. What is narrative? Ricoeur, bakhtin, and process approaches. Concrescence: The Australasian Journal of Process Thought 3. 1–12.Suche in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. 1984. Time and narrative, vol. 1. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. 1991. Narrative identity. In David Wood (ed.), On Paul Ricoeur, Narrative and Interpretation, 188–199. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Sarton, May. 1973. Journal of a Solitude – the Journals of may Sarton. New York: W W Norton & Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Savin-Baden, Maggi & Wimpenny Katherine. 2014. A practical guide to arts-related research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6209-815-2Suche in Google Scholar

Scheffler, Judith (ed.). 2002. Wall tappings – an international anthology of women’s prison writings 200 to the present. New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York.Suche in Google Scholar

Scheffler, Judith. 1984. Women’s prison writing: An unexplored tradition in literature. The Prison Journal 64(1). 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/003288558406400106.Suche in Google Scholar

Schept, Judah. 2014. (Un)seeing like a prison: Counter-visual ethnography of the carceral estate. Theoretical Criminology 18(2). 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613517256.Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, Pat. 2003. Writing Alone and with others. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195165739.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Schwan, Anne. 2014. Convict voices – women, class and writing about prison in nineteenth-century England. Durham: University of New Hampshire Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Shields, Walker. 2009. Imaginative literature and Bion’s intersubjective theory of thinking. Psychoanalytic Quarterly LXXVIII(2). 559–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2009.tb00404.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Waters, Sara. 2000. Affinity. London: Virago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Westall, Claire. 2021. Introduction: A wide and worlded vision of prison writing. In Michelle Kelly & Claire Westall (eds.), Prison writing and the literary world imprisonment, institutionality and questions of literary practice. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781003105787-1Suche in Google Scholar

Whitecross, Rosalchen (ed.). 2021. How bleak is the crow’s nest: An anthology of women’s prison writing. Colchester: Muscaliet Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wood, D. (ed.). 1991. On paul ricoeur, narrative and interpretation. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-02-19
Accepted: 2024-03-07
Published Online: 2024-03-27
Published in Print: 2025-01-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Special Issue: Tribal Epistemologies and the discursive construction of COVID-19 knowledge; Guest Editor: Rodney H. Jones
  3. Disciplinary tribes and the discourse of mainstream media expert opinion articles: evidencing COVID-19 knowledge claims for a public audience
  4. Ways of seeing and discourse strategies of naming the novel coronavirus in the US and Hong Kong
  5. Who is our friend and who is our enemy? The enregisterment of tribalising digital discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic
  6. “By the way I want to give you some masks”: exploring multimodal stance-taking in YouTube videos
  7. Affective geographies and tribal epistemologies: studying abroad during COVID-19
  8. Editorial
  9. Tribal epistemologies and the discursive construction of COVID-19 knowledge
  10. Special Issue: Against Epistemological Theft and Appropriation; Guest Editors: Othman Z. Barnawi and Hamza R’boul
  11. The myopic focus on decoloniality in applied linguistics and English language education: citations and stolen subjectivities
  12. The bidirectionality of epistemological theft and appropriation: contrastive rhetoric in China
  13. Attempts at including, mediating and creating ‘new’ knowledges: problematising appropriation in intercultural communication education and research
  14. Epistemological theft and appropriation in qualitative inquiry in applied linguistics: lessons from Halaqa
  15. Can the subaltern speak in autoethnography?: knowledging through dialogic and retro/intro/pro-spective reflection to stand against epistemic violence
  16. The violence of literature review and the imperative to ask new questions
  17. Editorial
  18. Against epistemological theft and appropriation in applied linguistics research
  19. Special Issue: Art as social practice: language and marginality; Guest Editors: Roberta Piazza, Birgul Yilmaz and Charlotte Taylor
  20. ‘Art as social practice: language and marginality’: Special Issue of Applied Linguistics Review
  21. Objects are not just a thing – (re)negotiating identity through using material objects within the Kurdish diaspora in the UK
  22. “I am surprised they have allowed you in here to do this”: women’s prison writing as heterotopic space of narrative inclusion
  23. Walking with: understandings and negotiations of the mundane in research
  24. Translanguaging art – Questioning boundaries in Monika Szydłowska’s Do you miss your country?
  25. Reinventing the self through participatory art: writing and performing among rough sleepers
  26. Research Articles
  27. Expectation-practice discrepancies: a transcultural exploration of Chinese students’ oral discourse socialization in German academia
  28. Perceived teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation and engagement in English learning: a survey of Chinese university students
  29. Incidental vocabulary learning from listening, reading, and viewing captioned videos: frequency and prior vocabulary knowledge
  30. A longitudinal study on lecture listening difficulties and self-regulated learning strategies across different proficiency levels in EMI higher education
  31. Secondary students’ L2 writing motivation and engagement: the impact of teachers’ instructional approaches and feedback practices
  32. Marked on the voice: the visibility experiences of Russian heritage migrants following the war against Ukraine
Heruntergeladen am 16.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2024-0058/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen