Secondary students’ L2 writing motivation and engagement: the impact of teachers’ instructional approaches and feedback practices

References

Acock, Alan C. 2005. Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(4). 1012–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00191.x.Search in Google Scholar

Badger, Richard & Goodith White. 2000. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal 54(2). 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153.Search in Google Scholar

Bakla, Arif. 2020. A mixed-methods study of feedback modes in EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology 24(1). 107–128.Search in Google Scholar

Bai, Barry, Jing Wang & Youyan Nie. 2021. Self-efficacy, task values and growth mindset: What has the most predictive power for primary school students’ self-regulated learning in English writing and writing competence in an Asian Confucian cultural context? Cambridge Journal of Education 51(1). 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2020.1778639.Search in Google Scholar

Belcher, Diane D. 2017. On becoming facilitators of multimodal composing and digital design. Journal of Second Language Writing 38. 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2010. Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2). 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109990544.Search in Google Scholar

Fredricks, Jennifer A., Phyllis C. Blumenfeld & Alison H. Paris. 2004. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74(1). 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.Search in Google Scholar

Geng, Feng, Shulin Yu, Chunhong Liu & Zhuoyao Liu. 2022. Teaching and learning writing in English as a foreign language (EFL) school education contexts: A thematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 66(3). 491–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1897872.Search in Google Scholar

Hafner, Christoph A. 2015. Remix culture and English language teaching: The expression of learner voice in digital multimodal compositions. Tesol Quarterly 49(3). 486–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.238.Search in Google Scholar

Hafner, Christoph A. & Lindsay Miller. 2011. Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology 15(3). 68–86.Search in Google Scholar

Hafner, Christoph A. & Wing Yee Jenifer Ho. 2020. Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing 47. 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710.Search in Google Scholar

Han, Jiwon & Phil Hiver. 2018. Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing 40. 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2007. Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 16(3). 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken & Fiona Hyland (eds.). 2019. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. London: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108635547Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lianjiang. 2018. Digital multimodal composing and investment change in learners’ writing in English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 40. 60–72.10.1016/j.jslw.2018.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lianjiang. 2023. Multilingual youths’ digital activism through multimodal composing in the post-pandemic era. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2181353.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lianjiang. 2021. Facilitating EFL students’ civic participation through digital multimodal composing. Language, Culture and Curriculum. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1942032.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lianjiang & Jasmine, Luk. 2016. Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity System 59. 1–11.10.1016/j.system.2016.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lianjiang, Shulin Yu & Yi Zhao. 2021. Teacher engagement with digital multimodal composing in a Chinese tertiary EFL curriculum. Language Teaching Research 25(4). 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819864975.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lianlianjiang & Shulin Yu. 2021. Understanding changes in EFL teachers’ feedback practice during COVID-19:Implications for teacher feedback literacy at a time of crisis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 30. 509–518.10.1007/s40299-021-00583-9Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Lianjiang, Shulin Yu, Nan Zhou & Yiqin Xu. 2023. English writing instruction in Chinese students’ experience: A survey study. RELC Journal 54(1). 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220980227.Search in Google Scholar

Kahu, Ella R. 2013. Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education 38(5). 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505.Search in Google Scholar

Kline, Rex B. 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, Vijay & Elke Stracke. 2007. An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education 12(4). 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701415433.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Chunhong & Shulin Yu. 2022. Reconceptualizing the impact of feedback in second language writing: A multidimensional perspective. Assessing Writing 53. 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100630.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Icy. 2016. Enhancing motivation in Hong Kong writing classrooms. In EFL writing in East Asia: Practice, perception and perspectives, 172–181. Tokyo: Seisen University.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Icy. 2017. Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Singapore: Springer Singapore.10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Icy. 2019. Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching 52(4). 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444819000247.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Man-Kit & Michael Evans. 2019. Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. Modern Language Journal 103(4). 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.1259.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Icy & Kevin M. Wong. 2014. Bringing innovation to EFL writing: The case of a primary school in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 23(1). 159–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0149-y.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Icy, Shulin Yu & Yuan Liu. 2018. Hong Kong secondary students’ motivation in EFL writing: A survey study. Tesol Quarterly 52(1). 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.364.Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Fei Victor, Csilla Weninger & Thi Thu Ha Nguyen. 2021. “I expect boredom”: Students’ experiences and expectations of multiliteracies learning. Literacy 55(2). 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12243.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew J. 2012. Part II commentary: Motivation and engagement: Conceptual, operational, and empirical clarity. In Handbook of research on student engagement, 303–311. Boston, MA: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_14Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew J. 2017. Evolutionary psychology and the classroom: Implications for theory, research, and practice in motivation, learning, achievement, and instruction. In Big theories revisited. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Andrew. 2019. The motivation and engagement scale, 19th edn. Summer HillNSW 2130, Australia: Lifelong Achievement Group.Search in Google Scholar

Muthén, Linda K. & Bengt O. Muthén. 1998–2017. Mplus user’s guide, 8th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muth´en & Muth´en.Search in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2009. Studying writing across EFL contexts: Looking back and moving forward. In Rosa Manchón (ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research, 232–255. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691859-013Search in Google Scholar

Preacher, Kristopher J. & Andrew F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40(3). 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Thomas A. 2011. Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 29(4). 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406653.Search in Google Scholar

Shen, Bin, Barry Bai & Weihe Xue. 2020. The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation 64. 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821.Search in Google Scholar

Shin, Dong Shin, Tony Cimasko & Youngjoo Yi. 2020. Development of metalanguage for multimodal composing: A case study of an L2 writer’s design of multimedia texts. Journal of Second Language Writing 47. 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100714.Search in Google Scholar

Silva, Tony & Paul Kei Matsuda (eds.). 2010. Practicing theory in second language writing. South Carolina, US: Parlor Press LLC.Search in Google Scholar

Susser, Bernard. 1994. Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 3(1). 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90004-3.Search in Google Scholar

Tabachnick, Barbara G. & Linda S. Fidell. 2001. Chapter 4. Cleaning up your act. Using multivariate statistics, 4th edn. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Tsao, Jui Jung, Wen Ta Tseng & Chaochang Wang. 2017. The effects of writing anxiety and motivation on EFL college students’ self-evaluative judgments of corrective feedback. Psychological Reports 120(2). 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116687123.Search in Google Scholar

Waller, Laurel & Mostafa Papi. 2017. Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing 35. 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.004.Search in Google Scholar

Wentzel, Kathryn R. & David B. Miele. 2009. Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In Handbook of motivation at school, 237–260. Routledge.10.4324/9780203879498Search in Google Scholar

Wette, Rosemary. 2014. Teachers’ practices in EAP writing instruction: Use of models and modeling. System 42. 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

Yin, Hongbiao. 2018. What motivates Chinese undergraduates to engage in learning? Insights from a psychological approach to student engagement research. Higher Education 76(5). 827–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0239-0.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Shulin, Nan Zhou, Yao Zheng, Limin Zhang, Hongjian Cao & Xiaoming Li. 2019. Exploring student motivation and engagement in the Chinese EFL writing context. Studies in Educational Evaluation 62. 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Shulin, Lianjiang Jiang & Nan Zhou. 2020a. The impact of L2 writing instructional approaches on student writing motivation and engagement. Language Teaching Research. 1362168820957024. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820957024.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Shulin, Lianjiang Jiang & Nan Zhou. 2020b. Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing 44. 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Zhe Victor & Ken Hyland. 2018. Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing 36. 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004.Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, Yao & Shulin Yu. 2018. Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing 37. 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001.Search in Google Scholar