Home Epistemological theft and appropriation in qualitative inquiry in applied linguistics: lessons from Halaqa
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Epistemological theft and appropriation in qualitative inquiry in applied linguistics: lessons from Halaqa

  • Othman Z. Barnawi ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 23, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Within the current turn of decolonization in the field of applied linguistics, the dominant discourses may have little to say about exposing and disrupting the act of epistemological theft and appropriation in qualitative research methodologies, even implicitly. Epistemological theft and appropriation refer to the (in)deliberate intricate acts of dispossessing the original knowers of their epistemological ownership over certain knowledges in their research practices. This paper introduces and operationalizes Halaqa as an alternative way of theorizing and doing qualitative research that is not only anchored in non-western epistemologies but can also be employed as a means for disrupting theft and appropriation in literature review and drawing on participants’ narratives within qualitative inquiry. Through a four-month journey of dialogue with three in-service Saudi western-trained language teachers-educators-researchers in our Halaqa, we co-explored possible mechanisms that foster legitimate ownership of epistemologies and emphasize appreciating other ways of knowing that may not be necessarily aligned with our perspectives about ELT in applied linguistics research. This paper concludes with a call for a nuanced and continuous process of self-critique and reappraisal that centers ethical, moral and epistemic imperatives while doing a literature review and drawing on participants’ narratives.


Corresponding author: Othman Z. Barnawi, English Language Department, Royal Commission for Yanbu Colleges and Institutes, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia, E-mail:

References

Avineri, Netta & Danny Martinez. 2021. Applied linguists cultivating relationships for justice: An aspirational call to action. Applied Linguistics 42(6). 1043–1054. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab065.Search in Google Scholar

Barnawi, Osman & Hamza R’boul. 2023. Colonizability and hermeneutical injustice in applied linguistics research: (Im)possibilities for epistemological delinking. Available at: https://apps.crossref.org/pendingpub/pendingpub.html?doi=10.1093%2Fapplin%2Famad047&fbclid=IwAR3T9WQVYNu3smyu79xfKzXe0vuR2UwTRs23hJH7JsuZAnfymhGbwQUHgko.Search in Google Scholar

Baumeister, Roy & Mark Leary. 1997. Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology 1. 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311.Search in Google Scholar

Bennabi, Malik. 1949. Conditions to renaissance [Shourout Annahda]. Trans. Omar Meskaoui and Abd Sabour Shaheen. Algeria: Dar al Fikr.Search in Google Scholar

Bryman, Alan. 2008. Social research methods, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Canagarajah, Suresh. 2022. Challenges in decolonizing linguistics: The politics of enregisterment and the divergent uptakes of translingualism. Educational Linguistics 1(1). 25–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/eduling-2021-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, John & Cheryl Poth. 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. New York: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Demeter, Marton. 2020. Power relations in global knowledge production. A cultural/critical approach. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 15(1). 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2019.1657124.Search in Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2015. Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2021. Decolonizing the university: The challenge of deep cognitive justice. Cambridge, The UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Fang, Fan & Sender Dovchin. 2024. Reflection and reform of applied linguistics from the Global South: Power and inequality in English users from the Global South. Applied Linguistics Review 15. 1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0072.Search in Google Scholar

Gavino, Annielille. 2021. Unpacking the buzzword “Decolonization”. ThinkingDance. Available at: https://thinkingdance.net/articles/2021/05/24/Unpacking-the-buzzword-Decolonization-.Search in Google Scholar

Held, Mirjam. 2019. Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism: An unsettling, mutual, and collaborative effort. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18(1). 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918821574.Search in Google Scholar

Holliday, Adrian. 2021. Recovering unrecognised deCentred experience. In Margaret Kumar & Thushari Welikala (eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education: The context of being, interculturality and new knowledge systems, 185–196. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.10.1108/978-1-80043-006-820211014Search in Google Scholar

Kincheloe, Joe. 1991. Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.Search in Google Scholar

Makoni, Sinfree, Magda Madany-Saa, Bassey Anita & Rafael Gomes. 2022. Decolonial voices, language and race. Bristol, The UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800413498Search in Google Scholar

Mignolo, Walter. 2003. The darker side of the renaissance: Literacy, territoriality, and colonization. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.8739Search in Google Scholar

Omanga, Duncan. 2020. Decolonization, decoloniality, and the future of African studies: A conversation with Dr. Sabelo Ndlovu-Gatsheni. https://items.ssrc.org/from-our-programs/decolonization-decoloniality-and-the-future-of-african-studies-a-conversation-with-dr-sabelo-ndlovu-gatsheni/ (accessed 8 October 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Patria, Muhammad Yusuf. 2020. Colonialism and colonisabilitlty in Malik Bennabiʼs political thought. Kuala Lumpur: Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia Masterʼs thesis.Search in Google Scholar

R’boul, Hamza. 2022. Epistemological plurality in intercultural communication knowledge. Journal of Multicultural Discourses. 17(2). 173–188.10.1080/17447143.2022.2069784Search in Google Scholar

Rigney, Lester-Irabinna. 1999. Internationalization of an indigenous anticolonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to indigenist research methodology and its principles. Wicazo Sa Review 14(2). 109–121. https://doi.org/10.2307/1409555.Search in Google Scholar

Shore, Ira. 2017. Making Freire’s first talking book: A pedagogy for liberation, 1983–1986. Rizoma Freireano 22. 4–5.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, Linda. 2012. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples, 2nd edn. London: Zed Books.Search in Google Scholar

Thambinathan, Vivetha & Elizabeth Anne Kinsella. 2021. Decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Creating spaces for transformative praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766.Search in Google Scholar

Torraco, Richard. 2005. Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review 4(1). 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283.Search in Google Scholar

Tynan, Lauren & Michelle Bishop. 2022. Decolonizing the literature review: A relational approach. Qualitative Inquiry 29(3). 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004221101594.Search in Google Scholar

Viana, Vander, Ursula Stickler & Maureen K. Michael. 2021. Giving voice to applied linguistics from the Global South. System 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102423.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-01-08
Accepted: 2024-01-18
Published Online: 2024-02-23
Published in Print: 2025-01-29

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Special Issue: Tribal Epistemologies and the discursive construction of COVID-19 knowledge; Guest Editor: Rodney H. Jones
  3. Disciplinary tribes and the discourse of mainstream media expert opinion articles: evidencing COVID-19 knowledge claims for a public audience
  4. Ways of seeing and discourse strategies of naming the novel coronavirus in the US and Hong Kong
  5. Who is our friend and who is our enemy? The enregisterment of tribalising digital discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic
  6. “By the way I want to give you some masks”: exploring multimodal stance-taking in YouTube videos
  7. Affective geographies and tribal epistemologies: studying abroad during COVID-19
  8. Editorial
  9. Tribal epistemologies and the discursive construction of COVID-19 knowledge
  10. Special Issue: Against Epistemological Theft and Appropriation; Guest Editors: Othman Z. Barnawi and Hamza R’boul
  11. The myopic focus on decoloniality in applied linguistics and English language education: citations and stolen subjectivities
  12. The bidirectionality of epistemological theft and appropriation: contrastive rhetoric in China
  13. Attempts at including, mediating and creating ‘new’ knowledges: problematising appropriation in intercultural communication education and research
  14. Epistemological theft and appropriation in qualitative inquiry in applied linguistics: lessons from Halaqa
  15. Can the subaltern speak in autoethnography?: knowledging through dialogic and retro/intro/pro-spective reflection to stand against epistemic violence
  16. The violence of literature review and the imperative to ask new questions
  17. Editorial
  18. Against epistemological theft and appropriation in applied linguistics research
  19. Special Issue: Art as social practice: language and marginality; Guest Editors: Roberta Piazza, Birgul Yilmaz and Charlotte Taylor
  20. ‘Art as social practice: language and marginality’: Special Issue of Applied Linguistics Review
  21. Objects are not just a thing – (re)negotiating identity through using material objects within the Kurdish diaspora in the UK
  22. “I am surprised they have allowed you in here to do this”: women’s prison writing as heterotopic space of narrative inclusion
  23. Walking with: understandings and negotiations of the mundane in research
  24. Translanguaging art – Questioning boundaries in Monika Szydłowska’s Do you miss your country?
  25. Reinventing the self through participatory art: writing and performing among rough sleepers
  26. Research Articles
  27. Expectation-practice discrepancies: a transcultural exploration of Chinese students’ oral discourse socialization in German academia
  28. Perceived teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation and engagement in English learning: a survey of Chinese university students
  29. Incidental vocabulary learning from listening, reading, and viewing captioned videos: frequency and prior vocabulary knowledge
  30. A longitudinal study on lecture listening difficulties and self-regulated learning strategies across different proficiency levels in EMI higher education
  31. Secondary students’ L2 writing motivation and engagement: the impact of teachers’ instructional approaches and feedback practices
  32. Marked on the voice: the visibility experiences of Russian heritage migrants following the war against Ukraine
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2024-0013/html
Scroll to top button