Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik 3. The pragmatics of the genres of fiction
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

3. The pragmatics of the genres of fiction

  • Janet Giltrow
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Pragmatics of Fiction
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Pragmatics of Fiction

Abstract

With a principal but not exclusive focus on literary fiction, this chapter takes a phenomenological rather than formalist approach to genre, and looks for explanation in the sociality of language users’ experience. Section 2 finds such an approach in Levinson’s Activity Types, in aspects of historical pragmatics, in Goffman’s frame analysis, in Rhetorical Genre Theory, and in Moretti’s “distant reading” of literary types. Aligning with Grice’s Maxims and, in particular, with the “weak implicatures” of Sperber and Wilson’s revision of Grice, Section 3 reviews pragmatic accounts of fiction (Adams, Mey, Pilkington, Black) and also stakes, with Wilson, a fundamental continuity between fictional uses of language and other uses. With this continuity in view, Section 3 emphasises a social-action rather than aesthetic account of fiction genres: fiction genres build on language users’ capacity for invention (Chafe); for accommodating to overhearing (Clark); for “engrossment” (Goffman); for drawing inference from the representation of others’ voices (e.g. Bakhtin, Vološinov); and above all for weak implicature - in fiction deriving uncertain inferences at the outer limit of what a writer might plausibly have intended to mean. Hazarding a social explanation for literary fiction, Section 3 suggests that the exploitation of these capacities by literary fiction genres, in their long and unceasing development, up-dates readers’ intelligence of the social order. As that social order changes, so will the conditions of this intelligence. The chapter mentions and concludes with brief discussion of “meta-genre” (Giltrow): talk and activity around a genre, and their social ramifications.

Abstract

With a principal but not exclusive focus on literary fiction, this chapter takes a phenomenological rather than formalist approach to genre, and looks for explanation in the sociality of language users’ experience. Section 2 finds such an approach in Levinson’s Activity Types, in aspects of historical pragmatics, in Goffman’s frame analysis, in Rhetorical Genre Theory, and in Moretti’s “distant reading” of literary types. Aligning with Grice’s Maxims and, in particular, with the “weak implicatures” of Sperber and Wilson’s revision of Grice, Section 3 reviews pragmatic accounts of fiction (Adams, Mey, Pilkington, Black) and also stakes, with Wilson, a fundamental continuity between fictional uses of language and other uses. With this continuity in view, Section 3 emphasises a social-action rather than aesthetic account of fiction genres: fiction genres build on language users’ capacity for invention (Chafe); for accommodating to overhearing (Clark); for “engrossment” (Goffman); for drawing inference from the representation of others’ voices (e.g. Bakhtin, Vološinov); and above all for weak implicature - in fiction deriving uncertain inferences at the outer limit of what a writer might plausibly have intended to mean. Hazarding a social explanation for literary fiction, Section 3 suggests that the exploitation of these capacities by literary fiction genres, in their long and unceasing development, up-dates readers’ intelligence of the social order. As that social order changes, so will the conditions of this intelligence. The chapter mentions and concludes with brief discussion of “meta-genre” (Giltrow): talk and activity around a genre, and their social ramifications.

Heruntergeladen am 10.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110431094-003/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen