Home Linguistics & Semiotics 3. The pragmatics of the genres of fiction
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

3. The pragmatics of the genres of fiction

  • Janet Giltrow
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Pragmatics of Fiction
This chapter is in the book Pragmatics of Fiction

Abstract

With a principal but not exclusive focus on literary fiction, this chapter takes a phenomenological rather than formalist approach to genre, and looks for explanation in the sociality of language users’ experience. Section 2 finds such an approach in Levinson’s Activity Types, in aspects of historical pragmatics, in Goffman’s frame analysis, in Rhetorical Genre Theory, and in Moretti’s “distant reading” of literary types. Aligning with Grice’s Maxims and, in particular, with the “weak implicatures” of Sperber and Wilson’s revision of Grice, Section 3 reviews pragmatic accounts of fiction (Adams, Mey, Pilkington, Black) and also stakes, with Wilson, a fundamental continuity between fictional uses of language and other uses. With this continuity in view, Section 3 emphasises a social-action rather than aesthetic account of fiction genres: fiction genres build on language users’ capacity for invention (Chafe); for accommodating to overhearing (Clark); for “engrossment” (Goffman); for drawing inference from the representation of others’ voices (e.g. Bakhtin, Vološinov); and above all for weak implicature - in fiction deriving uncertain inferences at the outer limit of what a writer might plausibly have intended to mean. Hazarding a social explanation for literary fiction, Section 3 suggests that the exploitation of these capacities by literary fiction genres, in their long and unceasing development, up-dates readers’ intelligence of the social order. As that social order changes, so will the conditions of this intelligence. The chapter mentions and concludes with brief discussion of “meta-genre” (Giltrow): talk and activity around a genre, and their social ramifications.

Abstract

With a principal but not exclusive focus on literary fiction, this chapter takes a phenomenological rather than formalist approach to genre, and looks for explanation in the sociality of language users’ experience. Section 2 finds such an approach in Levinson’s Activity Types, in aspects of historical pragmatics, in Goffman’s frame analysis, in Rhetorical Genre Theory, and in Moretti’s “distant reading” of literary types. Aligning with Grice’s Maxims and, in particular, with the “weak implicatures” of Sperber and Wilson’s revision of Grice, Section 3 reviews pragmatic accounts of fiction (Adams, Mey, Pilkington, Black) and also stakes, with Wilson, a fundamental continuity between fictional uses of language and other uses. With this continuity in view, Section 3 emphasises a social-action rather than aesthetic account of fiction genres: fiction genres build on language users’ capacity for invention (Chafe); for accommodating to overhearing (Clark); for “engrossment” (Goffman); for drawing inference from the representation of others’ voices (e.g. Bakhtin, Vološinov); and above all for weak implicature - in fiction deriving uncertain inferences at the outer limit of what a writer might plausibly have intended to mean. Hazarding a social explanation for literary fiction, Section 3 suggests that the exploitation of these capacities by literary fiction genres, in their long and unceasing development, up-dates readers’ intelligence of the social order. As that social order changes, so will the conditions of this intelligence. The chapter mentions and concludes with brief discussion of “meta-genre” (Giltrow): talk and activity around a genre, and their social ramifications.

Downloaded on 27.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110431094-003/html
Scroll to top button