The evaluation of the relationship between anti angiotensin type I antibodies in hypertensive patients undergoing kidney transplantation
-
Hayriye Senturk Ciftci
, Emel Eksioglu Demiralp
, Serpil Gorcin
, Demet Kivanc
, Funda Yalcin
, Aydın Turkmen
and Fatma Savran Oguz
Abstract
Objectives
We aimed to compare the anti-angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) antibody levels considering the development of anti-HLA antibodies after transplantation, pathologically confirmed humoral or vascular rejection reactions and late complications.
Methods
Forty-nine hypertensive patients who had presented to the Division of Nephrology, Transplantation Outpatient Clinic of Memorial Health Group Hospitals Transplant Units and Istanbul Medical Faculty for live kidney transplantation and underwent transplantation between 2015 and 2019, were included in our study. Among our patients (29 males/20 females), 76 % had primary hypertension, and 24 % had secondary hypertension. In this study, serum AT1R antibody levels before and after transplantation were measured using the Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA) method. The anti-HLA antibody was detected with the Luminex method using the single antigen bead (SAB) assay.
Results
The AT1R antibody was found positive in 7 (18.9 %) of 37 patients who had primary hypertension and in 4 (33.3 %) of 12 patients who had secondary hypertension (p=0.426). The examination of the frequencies of development of post-transplant anti-HLA antibodies showed that the frequency of AT1R antibody positivity was found higher in the group with positive anti-HLA antibodies compared to the levels in the group with negative anti-HLA antibodies (p=0.002). The comparison of the pre-transplant and post-transplant values showed that the AT1R antibody level was statistically significantly decreased after transplantation [7.3/6.6 (3.2–21.1) vs. 6.2/4.7 (1.5–24.5), p=0.001].
Conclusions
The findings of our study suggest that the evaluation of the AT1R antibody levels among non-HLA antibodies may be important for predicting the immunological risk before transplantation.
Introduction
Kidney transplantation has been the most up-to-date treatment method in patients with end stage renal failure [1]. One of the important problems detected in patients, who have received a kidney transplant, is the rejection of the transplanted organ by the recipient. Immunosuppressive treatment is administered to prevent the rejection of the transplanted kidney [2]. Recently, increasing efficiency due to the increasing diversity of immunosuppressive drugs used in treatments and therefore effective immunosuppression, Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) typing in recipients and donors, and developing anti-HLA antibody detection techniques have significantly improved the results of kidney transplantation and reduced rejection rates, graft survival. It has been reported that the retention rate has increased [3]. Long-term survival of the graft after kidney transplantation is affected by immunological and non-immunological factors. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) prevents long-term graft survival by contributing to both acute and chronic allograft rejection [4]. Protocol biopsy results are important in terms of revealing post-transplant alloimmune responses, drug toxicities, acute and chronic organ rejections and viral enfections.
Some centers conduct routine follow-up protocols, however, most centers do not perform these protocols [5], 6]. Although donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA) are known to cause damage in the transplanted kidney through complement-associated and antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity, the importance of the effects of non-HLA antibodies after kidney transplantation in the early and late period has not been fully clarified [7]. Researchers reported that the development of antibodies against non-HLA auto-antigens after transplantation was associated with rejection and graft survival [8]. Non-HLA antibodies are classified into two groups: antibodies against polymorphic antigens that indicate differences between patient and donor, and autoantibodies that recognize self-antigens. Because the vasculature is located at the interface of the transplanted organ, a significant portion of the non-HLA antibodies reported to mediate renal rejection also recognize autoantigens expressed by endothelial cells [9], 10]. Anti-endothelial antibodies, gene A and B antigens (MIC-A and MIC-B), major histocompatibility complex class I chain, vimentin, cardiolipin, glomerular basal membrane protein agrin, glutathione S-transferase T1 and angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) are among the non-HLAs that have been studied [11], 12]. AT1R antibodies are non-HLA antibodies that have recently been studied in graft injury, and rejection. First, they were identified in adult kidney transplants. Some studies associated the AT1R antibodies with unfavourable outcomes in other solid organ transplants such as heart, lung and liver transplants [13], 14]. Among non-HLA antibodies, AT1R antibodies are a component of the Renin-Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAS). Antibodies against AT1R were first demonstrated in the studies on preeclampsia. These antibodies were shown to have caused maternal and fetal mortality and morbidity [15]. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of RAS in transplantation immunology and immune regulation [16], 17]. Some studies reported that RAS is also involved in endothelial changes occurring in organ injury after kidney transplantation and leads to vascular endothelial activation with antibody-mediated mechanisms [16], 17]. In the study, it was reported for the first time that AT1R antibody levels increased in recipients with severe steroid-resistant vascular rejection and malignant hypertension in the absence of HLA-DSA after kidney transplantation [16]. Studies have reported severe vascular rejection independent of donor-specific antibodies in kidney transplant patients who were found to have AT1R-antibody [18]. AT1R is the receptor for Ang II in the glomeruli and has a role in regulating arterial blood pressure and salt balance. Additionally, AT1R is expressed in the brush border of the proximal tubule, basolateral membrane, and vessels. AT1R is a member of the family of seven transmembrane G protein receptors (GPCR). The extracellular glycolysated region is attached to the seven-transmembrane alpha helix. AT1R antibodies (AT1R-Antibody=AT1R-AA) bind to the second extracellular portion of AT1R [17], 19]. The main mechanism among the antibody-mediated mechanisms of organ injury after kidney transplantation is suggested to be the changes occurring in the endothelium as a result of vascular endothelial activation. Endothelial cells were reported to have expressed the AT1R and these receptors’ AT1R antibodies might be allosteric activators like AT1R’s natural ligands [20]. The binding of AT1R-antibody to AT1R is suggested as a critical step in kidney injury after transplantation.
In this study, we aimed to examine the serum AT1R antibody levels in kidney transplant patients who had primary and secondary hypertension and post-transplant renal dysfunction, and to associate these levels with the clinical condition. The primary outcome is to compare AT1R antibody levels, taking into account post-transplant PRA developments, pathologically confirmed humoral or vascular rejection reactions, and late complications. Secondary outcome is to clarify whether there is a factor accompanying PRA positivity if there are patients among the patient groups showing de novo PRA positivity.
Materials and methods
Patients population
In this study, 49 hypertensive patients who presented to Memorial Health Group Hospitals Transplant Units and Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, for kidney transplantation and underwent living-related kidney transplantation between 2015 and 2019, were included. Donors were considered relatives up to the fourth degree. Among our patients, 37 (76 %) had primary hypertension, and 12 (24 %) had secondary hypertension.
Measurement of the AT1R antibody levels
The blood samples were centrifuged at 5,000 revolutions for 5 min, and the obtained sera were stored at −20 degrees Celsius. The serum AT1R antibody levels of the patients before and after transplantation were measured using the Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA) method (One Lambda,/Thermo Fisher Scientific/Canoga Park, CA, USA). AT1R antibody levels were determined using a calibration curve with a cut-off value of 10 U/mL in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions in the kit content. Results over 17 U/mL were considered positive, results from 10 to 17 U/mL were considered suspicious, and results lower than 10 U/mL were considered negative. The kit can be used in serum, plasma, body fluids and tissue homogenate. The sensitivity of the kit is 1.0 U/mL. Quality control experiments that evaluated repeatability determined intra-assay CV (%) and inter-assay CV (%) values.
Detection of HLA antibodies
Anti-HLA antibody was detected with the Luminex method (One Lambda, Canoga Park, CA, USA) using the single antigen bead (SAB) test. The sera were tested using the L-SAB Assay according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the presence of anti-HLA antibodies was evaluated. Results showing an MFI value over 1,000 were considered positive.
Identification of the post-transplant rejection episode
After transplantation, patients were followed clinically with urine output and blood creatinine levels for the first 3–5 days. A decrease in urinary output and/or increased blood creatinine level is accepted as early rejection episode.
Development of post-transplant PRA, pathologically confirmed humoral or vascular rejection reactions and late complication were considered. The diagnoses of humoral or vascular kidney rejection were also confirmed histologically according to the revised Banff 2007 classification [21].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 23.0, IBM, Corp Armonk, NY, Chicago, IL, USA). The results are expressed as mean±standard deviation.
Parametric analyses were used for the data with a normal distribution, and nonparametric analyses were used for the data with no normal distribution. The independent samples t-test was used to compare the numerical data between the groups. The chi-square analysis was used to compare the categorical data between the groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare AT1R antibody levels measurements of the groups before and after the operation. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Sample size analysis: Assuming higher levels for post-transplant rejection compared to lack of rejection and predicting a 15 % increase in AT1R antibody levels (3.7 U/mL–4.2 U/mL), 23 patients were calculated for each group when the α error value was 0.5 with a power of 90 %. It was planned to recruit a minimum of 49 patients considering that 5 % might withdraw from the study for any reason.
Results
The mean age of the patients included in the study was found as 46.88 ± 12.23 years. The mean age was found as 46.88 ± 12.01 years in men and 46.89 ± 12.46 years in women. Twenty nine (59.2 %) men and 20 women (40.8 %) participated in the study. The mean duration of chronic renal failure was found as 34.45 ± 49.94 months (range= 0–216 months) and the mean duration of dialysis was found as 15.61 ± 37.04 months (range=0–144 months) among the patients (Table 1). Demographic and clinical information is shown in Table 1.
Demographic and clinical data of the patients.
Parameters | n=49 | Number of the patients who underwent transplantation %100 |
---|---|---|
Sex (female/male) n, % | 20/29 | 40.8/59.2 |
Age (mean ± SD, years) | 46.88 ± 12.23 | |
CRF duration (mean ± SD, months) | 34.45 ± 49.94 | |
HT (primary/secondary) n, % | 37/12 | 76/24 |
Dialysis duration (mean ± SD, months) | 15.61 ± 37.04 | |
Graft loss n, % | 1 | 2.0 |
Late complication | 12 | 26.5 |
Vascular rejection/humoral rejection n, % | 6/2 | 12.2/4.1 |
Posttransplant anti HLA antibody positivity n, % | 7 | 14.3 |
Posttransplant de novo DSA positivity n, % | – | – |
-
SD, standard deviation; CRF, chronic renal failure; HT, hypertension; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; DSA, donor specific antibodies.
AT1R antibody levels and clinical implication
Eighty-seven samples of 49 patients were studied. Forty four (50.6 %) of 87 samples belonged to the pre-transplant period and 43 (49.4 %) belonged to the post-transplant period. The patients were divided into two groups according to AT1R antibody levels. AT1R antibody levels of <10 U/ml were considered negative and an AT1R antibody levels of >10 U/ml were considered positive. Accordingly, AT1R antibody positivity was found in 11 (22.4 %) of 49 kidney transplant patients. In 3 (27.3 %) of 11 patients, AT1R antibody positivity was found both before and after kidney transplantation. AT1R antibody positivity was found in a total of 14 samples including 8 (57.1 %) samples before transplantation and 6 (42.9 %) samples after transplantation. AT1R antibody positivity was shown in 4 (33.3 %) of 12 patients who had primary hypertensiyon and in 7 (18.9 %) of 37 patients who had secondary hypertension. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of AT1R antibody positivity (p=0.426) (Table 2).
Frequency of anti-AT1R antibody in patients with primary and secondary hypertension.
Anti-AT1R (+) | Anti-AT1R (−) | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Primary hypertension (n=37),% | 7 (18.9 %) | 30 (81.1 %) | 0.426 |
Secondary hypertension (n=12),% | 4 (33.3 %) | 8 (66.7 %) |
-
AT1R, angiotensin II type I receptor.
The evaluation of the results of the patients with the post-transplant rejection parameters, it was found that vascular rejection data could be reached in 47 of 49 patients and six patients (12.8 %) had vascular rejection. In addition, humoral rejection data could be reached in 46 patients and two patients (4.3 %) had humoral rejection. In addition, 10 (28.6 %) of 35 patients, whose data were available, were found to have late complications. Post-transplant anti-HLA positivity was found in 7 (14.3 %) of 49 patients. The comparison of the AT1R antibody positivity with clinical data, AT1R positivity was found in 1 (2.1 %) patient who had post-transplant vascular rejection, in 1 (4.3 %) patient who had post-transplant humoral rejection, and in 4 (8.2 %) of the patients who had post-transplant anti-HLA positivity. No significant statistical difference was found between the groups for both rejections (p=0.443, p=0.402, respectively) (Table 3). The considering of post-transplant anti-HLA, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p=0.002) (Table 3).
Relationship of frequency of anti-AT1R antibody levels and clinical outcome.
Clinical outcome | n | Anti-AT1R (+) | n | Anti-AT1R (−) | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vascular rejection (+) n=6 (12.8 %) | 1 | 2.1 % | 5 | 10.7 % | 0.443 |
Vascular rejection (−) n=41 (87.2 %) | 3 | 6.4 % | 38 | 80.8 % | |
Humoral rejection (+) n=2 (4.3 %) | 1 | 2.15 % | 1 | 2.15 % | 0.402 |
Humoral rejection (−) (n=44) (95.7 %) | 3 | 6.5 % | 41 | 89.2 % | |
Late complication (+) n=10 (28.6 %) | 3 | 8.6 % | 7 | 20.0 % | 0.127 |
Late complication (−) (n=25) (71.4 %) | 2 | 5.7 % | 23 | 65.7 % | |
Post-transplant anti-HLA antibody positivity (+) n=7 (14.3 %) | 4 | 8.2 % | 3 | 6.1 % | 0.002 |
Post-transplant anti-HLA antibody positivity (−) n=42 (85.7 %) | 2 | 4.1 % | 40 | 81.6 % |
-
AT1R, angiotensin II type I receptor; HLA, human leukocyte antigens. Bold values indicate statistically significant data.
The examination of the pre-transplant and post-transplant AT1R antibody levels showed that the pre-transplant level was higher compared to the post-transplant level (Table 4).
Pre-transplant and post-transplant AT1R antibody levels.
Pre-transplant | Post-transplant | p-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
AT1R antibody level (U/mL)/median, (min–max) | 7.3/6.6 (3.2–21.1) | 6.2/4.7 (1.5–24.5) | 0.001 |
-
AT1R, angiotensin II type I receptor; min, minimum; max, maximum.
Discussion
In our study, we aimed to evaluate the occurrence frequency of AT1R antibody in patients who had rejection after kidney transplantation and the role of these antibodies in terms of clinical outcomes such as rejection and late complications, and to demonstrate the frequency of AT1R antibody in hypertensive patients. In addition, we also investigated the role of AT1R antibodies in post-transplant anti-HLA antibodies and whether the AT1R antibody could be a factor accompanying anti-HLA antibody positivity in patients showing de novo anti-HLA positivity. We aimed to obtain data about the issue if AT1R antibody occurred de novo or was present before transplantation. The role of AT1R antibodies has recently been frequently emphasized In a study conducted by Lee et al. [22] it was aimed to evaluate the frequency and role of occurrence of AT1R antibody in patients who had renal allograft rejection. In this study, the positivity of AT1R antibody was found as 9.4 % in 53 transplant patients. They found HLA class-I DSAs with a higher rate in AT1R antibody positive patients compared to AT1R antibody negative patients. However, they found no association between HLA class-II DSA and AT1R antibody positivity. They observed more severe cases of Banff IIA/IIB or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in four of five AT1R antibody positive patients. On the other hand, AMR was observed in 24 of 48 AT1R antibody negative patients and no statistical significance was found. In addition, they reported that both AT1R antibody and DSA were detected with a higher rate in AMR compared to T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and this was statistically significant [22]. In another study conducted with 351 patients, thegraft survival rates were found lower in patients who had both AT1R antibody and DSA compared to the patients who had DSA alone [23]. In a prospective cohort study conducted by Lefaucheur et al. which included 1,845 kidney transplant patients, it was shown that presence of non-HLA agonistic AT1R antibodies in the circulation was associated with an increase in antibody-mediated allograft rejection one year after transplantation and with a decrease in long term allograft survival [24]. In our study, we found AT1R antibody positivity in 11 of 49 kidney transplant patients. AT1R antibody positivity was found in a total of 14 samples including eight samples before transplantation and six samples after transplantation. In our study, AT1R antibody positivity was found with a higher rate in the presence of anti-HLA antibody compared to the absence of anti-HLA antibody after transplantation. In a study conducted by Reinsmoen et al. a higher level of pre-transplant AT1R antibody positivity was reported in the AMR patients who had no major tissue compatibility class-I chain related gene A (MICA) and DSA [25]. In our study, no significant difference could be found in terms of AT1R antibody levels in pre-transplant sera between the patients who had and did not have vascular and humoral rejection. The same investigators reported that the AT1R antibody level was higher in AMR patients at the time of rejection in the study conducted by Reinsmoen et al. In addition, the AT1R antibody levels were found lower at the time of rejection compared to pre-transplant AT1R antibody levels in the study of Reinsmoen et al., although no comparison was performed between pre-transplant and post-transplant AT1R antibody levels [25]. In this study, a statistically significant difference was found between pre-transplant and post-transplant AT1R antibody levels. Pre-transplant levels were found to be higher compared to post-transplant levels. It is suggested that the binding of AT1R antibodies, which is one of the non-HLA antibodies, to AT1R besides classical HLA antibodies is a critical step in terms of kidney injury after kidney transplantation. Recent studies have attempted to elucidate its association with rejection. Some studies state that the positivity of AT1R antibodies is associated with rejection in kidney transplantation. In a preliminary study conducted by Giral et al. with a group of 599 patients, they found that the presence of AT1R antibodies before transplantation was associated with acute rejection and showed that it was an independent risk factor for graft loss in the long term [26]. The same findings were obtained in two different studies published in 2014. In a study conducted by Banasik et al. from Poland, which included 117 patients, and a study conducted by Hernández-Méndez et al. from Mexico, which included 174 patients, it was reported that the rejection rate was higher and graft survival was lower in the group who had AT1R antibodies positivity before transplantation in the first post-transplant year compared to the group who had no AT1R antibody positivity [27], 28].
Conclusions
Many scientific studies are carried out on non-HLA antibody screening in addition to detecting HLA antibodies. This study showed a statistically significant difference in our primary composite outcome based on pre- and post-transplant AT1R antibody levels. Besides selecting a compatible donor before transplantation, knowing the reason of post-transplant organ rejection in the early period and rapid and accurate treatment are highly important for long term organ survival and function. Studies on the use of other treatment options such as plasmapheresis and AT1R antibody blockage later on for patients who are known to have AT1R antibody positivity have been pursued. Further studies should be conducted to confirm the immunological risk of AT1R in kidney transplantation. The limitation of our study was that the frequency of AT1R antibody positivity was low in post-transplant groups and the numbers of rejection was lower in our study group. The reading values of the kit that detects AT1R antibody levels may vary among populations. The lower limits of the kit are already low and these values may give even lower results in the patient group that has not had rejection. Higher values are expected in the patient group that has had rejection. In our study, the number of patients with rejection is also lower. The distribution of AT1R antibody values in the results of the patients is low. We predict that further studies with larger groups will give more illuminating results.
Acknowledgment
We thank to Berna Demirel and Sebahat Akgul Usta for their technical help.
-
Research ethics: This study was performed according to the principles expressed by the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the ethics committee of our institution (Memorial Şişli Hospital, No:006-12/12/2023).
-
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
-
Author contributions: Hayriye Senturk Ciftci: contributed to data analysis, and manuscript writing. Emel Eksioglu Demiralp: participated in research design, data collection, manuscript writing, and drafting article. Serpil Gorcin: contributed to data collection. Demet Kivanc: contributed to data analysis. Funda Yalcin: contributed to data collection. Aydin Turkmen: contributed to data collection, and contributed to project development. Fatma Savran Oguz: participated in research design, data analysis, manuscript writing, and drafting article.
-
Conflict of interests: All authors declare no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
1. Tonelli, M, Wiebe, N, Knoll, G, Bello, A, Browne, S, Jadhav, D, et al.. Systematic review: kidney transplantation compared with dialysis in clinically relevant outcomes. Am J Transplant 2011;11:2093–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03686.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Titiz, Mİ. Renal Transplantasyona Pratik Yaklaşım. Istanbul: Istanbul Medical Bookstore; 2004:11–12 pp.Search in Google Scholar
3. Montgomery, RA, Tatapudi, V, Leffell, MS, Zachary, AA. HLA in transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 2018;14:558–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-018-0039-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Parajuli, S, Aziz, F, Garg, N, Panzer, SE, Joachim, E, Muth, B, et al.. Histopathological characteristics and causes of kidney graft failure in the current era of immunosuppression. World J Transplant 2019;9:123–33. https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v9.i6.123.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
5. Nankivell, BJ, Chapman, JR. The significance of subclinical rejection and the value of protocol biopsies. Am J Transplant 2006;6:2006–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01436.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Szederkenyi, E, Ivanyi, B, Morvay, Z, Szenohradszki, P, Borda, B, Marofka, F, et al.. Treatment of subclinical injuries detected by protocol biopsy improves the long-term kidney allograft function: a single center prospective randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc 2011;43:1239–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.03.078.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Banasik, M, Boratynska, M, Koscielska-Kasprzak, K, Mazanowska, O, Bartoszek, D, Zabińska, M, et al.. Long-term follow-up of non-HLA and anti-HLA antibodies: incidence and importance in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 2013;45:1462–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.11.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Zhang, Q, Reed, EF. The importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 2016;12:484–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.88.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Bordron, A, Révélen, R, D’Arbonneau, F, Dueymes, M, Renaudineau, Y, Jamin, C, et al.. Functional heterogeneity of anti-endothelial cell antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol 2001;124:492–501. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2249.2001.01528.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Zou, Y, Stastny, P, Susal, C, Döhler, B, Opelz, G. Antibodies against MICA antigens and kidney-transplant rejection. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1293–300. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067160.Search in Google Scholar
11. Dragun, D. Non-HLA antibody induced agonism on the angiotensin II type 1 receptor in renal allograft vascular injury. Trends Transplant 2007;1:113–20.Search in Google Scholar
12. Dragun, D, Catar, R, Philippe, A. Non-HLA antibodies against endothelial targets bridging allo- and autoimmunity. Kidney Int 2016;90:280–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Dragun, D. The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor-activating antibodies in renal allograft vascular rejection. Pediatr Nephrol 2007;22:911–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-007-0452-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. O’Leary, JG, Demetris, AJ, Philips, A, Freeman, R, Cai, J, Heidecke, H, et al.. Non-HLA antibodies impact on C4d staining stellate cell activation and fibrosis in liver allografts. Transplantation 2017;101:2399–409. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000001853.Search in Google Scholar
15. Wallukat, G, Homuth, V, Fischer, T, Lindschau, C, Horstkamp, B, Jüpner, A, et al.. Patients with preeclampsia develop agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT1 receptor. J Clin Invest 1999;103:945–52. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci4106.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Dragun, D, Muller, DN, Brasen, JH, Fritsche, L, Nieminen-Kelhä, M, Dechend, R, et al.. Angiotensin II type 1-receptor activating antibodies in renal-allograft rejection. N Engl J Med 2005;352:558–69. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa035717.Search in Google Scholar
17. Dragun, D, Philippe, A, Catar, R. Role of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2012;17:440–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/mot.0b013e328355f12b.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Reinsmoen, L, Lai, CH, Heidecke, H, Haas, M, Cao, K, Ong, G, et al.. Antiangiotensin type 1 receptor antibodies associated with antibody mediated rejection in donor HLA antibody negative patients. Transplantation 2010;90:1473–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0b013e3181fd97f1.Search in Google Scholar
19. Ingelfinger, JR. Agonistic autoantibodies and rejection of renal allografts. N Engl J Med 2005;352:617–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejme048335.Search in Google Scholar
20. Dragun, D. Agonistic antibody-triggered stimulation of angiotensin II type 1 receptor and renal allograft vascular pathology. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:1819–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfm072.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Solez, K, Colvin, RB, Racusen, LC, Haas, M, Sis, B, Mengel, M, et al.. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant 2008;8:753–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02159.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Lee, H, Kim, JI, Moon, IS, Chung, BH, Yang, CW, Kim, Y, et al.. Investigation of serum angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies at the time of renal allograft rejecion. Ann Lab Med 2015;35:314–20. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2015.35.3.314.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
23. Taniguchi, M, Rebellato, LM, Cai, J, Hopfield, J, Briley, KP, Haisch, CE, et al.. Higher risk of kidney graft failure in the presence of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies. Am J Transplant 2013;13:2577–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12395.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Lefaucheur, C, Viglietti, D, Bouatou, Y, Philippe, A, Pievani, D, Aubert, O, et al.. Non-HLA agonistic anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies induce a distinctive phenotype of antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney Int 2019;96:189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2019.01.030.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Reinsmoen, NL, Lai, CH, Heidecke, H, Haas, M, Cao, K, Ong, G, et al.. Anti-angiotensin type 1 receptor antibodies associated with antibody mediated rejection in donor HLA antibody negative patients. Transplantation 2010;90:1473–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0b013e3181fd97f1.Search in Google Scholar
26. Giral, M, Foucher, Y, Dufay, A, Huyen, JPDV, Renaudin, K, Moreau, A, et al.. Pretransplant sensitization against angiotensin II type 1 receptor is a risk factor for acute rejection and graft loss. Am J Transplant 2013;13:2567–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12397.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
27. Banasik, M, Boratynska, M, Koscielska-Kasprzak, K, Kamińska, D, Bartoszek, D, Zabińska, M, et al.. The influence of non-HLA antibodies directed against angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) on early renal transplant outcomes. Transpl Int 2014;27:1029–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12371.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Hernandez-Mendez, EA, Arreola-Guerra, JM, Morales-Buenrostro, LE, Ramírez, JB, Calleja, S, Castelán, N, et al.. Pre-transplant angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies: a risk factor for decreased kidney graft function in the early post-transplant period? Revista de Investigacion Clínica 2014;66:218–24.10.1097/00007890-201407151-02137Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2024-0113).
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review Article
- Unveiling the hidden clinical and economic impact of preanalytical errors
- Research Articles
- To explore the role of hsa_circ_0053004/hsa-miR-646/CBX2 in diabetic retinopathy based on bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification
- Study on the LINC00578/miR-495-3p/RNF8 axis regulating breast cancer progression
- Comparison of two different anti-mullerian hormone measurement methods and evaluation of anti-mullerian hormone in polycystic ovary syndrome
- The evaluation of the relationship between anti angiotensin type I antibodies in hypertensive patients undergoing kidney transplantation
- Evaluation of neopterin, oxidative stress, and immune system in silicosis
- Assessment of lipocalin-1, resistin, cathepsin-D, neurokinin A, agmatine, NGF, and BDNF serum levels in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Regulatory nexus in inflammation, tissue repair and immune modulation in Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: PTX3, FGF2 and TNFAIP6
- Pasteur effect in leukocyte energy metabolism of patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19
- Thiol-disulfide homeostasis and ischemia-modified albumin in patients with sepsis
- Myotonic dystrophy type 1 and oxidative imbalance: evaluation of ischemia-modified albumin and oxidant stress
- Antioxidant and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activities of flavonoids isolated from fermented leaves of Camellia chrysantha (Hu) Tuyama
- Examination of the apelin signaling pathway in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in rats
- Integrating network pharmacology, in silico molecular docking and experimental validation to explain the anticancer, apoptotic, and anti-metastatic effects of cosmosiin natural product against human lung carcinoma
- Validation of Protein A chromatography: orthogonal method with size exclusion chromatography validation for mAb titer analysis
- The evaluation of the efficiency of Atellica UAS800 in detecting pathogens (rod, cocci) causing urinary tract infection
- Case Report
- Exploring inherited vitamin B responsive disorders in the Moroccan population: cutting-edge diagnosis via GC-MS profiling
- Letter to the Editor
- Letter to the Editor: “Gene mining, recombinant expression and enzymatic characterization of N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase”
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review Article
- Unveiling the hidden clinical and economic impact of preanalytical errors
- Research Articles
- To explore the role of hsa_circ_0053004/hsa-miR-646/CBX2 in diabetic retinopathy based on bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification
- Study on the LINC00578/miR-495-3p/RNF8 axis regulating breast cancer progression
- Comparison of two different anti-mullerian hormone measurement methods and evaluation of anti-mullerian hormone in polycystic ovary syndrome
- The evaluation of the relationship between anti angiotensin type I antibodies in hypertensive patients undergoing kidney transplantation
- Evaluation of neopterin, oxidative stress, and immune system in silicosis
- Assessment of lipocalin-1, resistin, cathepsin-D, neurokinin A, agmatine, NGF, and BDNF serum levels in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Regulatory nexus in inflammation, tissue repair and immune modulation in Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: PTX3, FGF2 and TNFAIP6
- Pasteur effect in leukocyte energy metabolism of patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19
- Thiol-disulfide homeostasis and ischemia-modified albumin in patients with sepsis
- Myotonic dystrophy type 1 and oxidative imbalance: evaluation of ischemia-modified albumin and oxidant stress
- Antioxidant and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activities of flavonoids isolated from fermented leaves of Camellia chrysantha (Hu) Tuyama
- Examination of the apelin signaling pathway in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in rats
- Integrating network pharmacology, in silico molecular docking and experimental validation to explain the anticancer, apoptotic, and anti-metastatic effects of cosmosiin natural product against human lung carcinoma
- Validation of Protein A chromatography: orthogonal method with size exclusion chromatography validation for mAb titer analysis
- The evaluation of the efficiency of Atellica UAS800 in detecting pathogens (rod, cocci) causing urinary tract infection
- Case Report
- Exploring inherited vitamin B responsive disorders in the Moroccan population: cutting-edge diagnosis via GC-MS profiling
- Letter to the Editor
- Letter to the Editor: “Gene mining, recombinant expression and enzymatic characterization of N-acetylglucosamine deacetylase”