Rotating bending fatigue behavior of high-pressure diecast AlSi10MgMn alloy based on T5 heat treatment parameters
-
Cemil Çağrı Gülmez
Cemil Çağrı Gülmez, born in 1990, graduated from Middle East Technical University in 2013 with a degree in Mechanical Engineering. He completed Master of Science study at Mechanical Engineering Department at Celal Bayar University. He has been working as a Design Engineer at Tusaş since 2022.
Can Çivi, born in 1987, graduated from Manisa Celal Bayar University in 2009 with a degree in Mechanical Engineer. He completed Master of Science and Doctoral study in Mechanical Engineering Department. He has been working as Assoc. Prof. Dr. Celal Bayar University Mechanical Engineering Department.
und
Gökhan Eyici
Gökhan Eyici, born in 1990, graduated from Dumlupınar University in 2012 with a bachelor degree in Mechanical Education Machining Teaching. He completed in 2019 a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Manisa Celal Bayar University. He completed his engineering completion training in 2020 and became an engineer. He has been working as the Manisa Celal Bayar University Laboratory Manager (Mechanical Engineering) since 2014.
Abstract
The study investigates fatigue failure, a common phenomenon in machine elements subjected to cyclic stresses. The analysis emphasizes that the actual stress experienced by materials often falls below their tensile and yield strengths due to repetitive variable stresses, leading to fatigue damage. Fatigue life is measured by the number of cycles endured before failure. This paper focuses on the aluminum alloy of AlSi10MgMn, extensively used in manufacturing due to its strength, low density, and corrosion resistance. Experimental procedures encompassed tensile testing, microstructural examination, SEM analysis, and fatigue testing. Tensile tests provided initial stress values for fatigue testing. Microstructure analyses verified that heat-treated samples exhibited precipitates. SEM analysis disclosed microstructural characteristics, while fracture surface examinations demonstrated higher fatigue resistance in heat-treated specimens. Hardness measurements were conducted, with heat-treated samples showing higher values. Theoretical calculations based on stress and cycle numbers were compared to experimental fatigue results. The derived equations aligned well with the tests. Ultimately, the study underlines the importance of heat treatment on material behavior and fatigue resistance, shedding light on alloy performance and durability enhancement.
About the authors
Cemil Çağrı Gülmez, born in 1990, graduated from Middle East Technical University in 2013 with a degree in Mechanical Engineering. He completed Master of Science study at Mechanical Engineering Department at Celal Bayar University. He has been working as a Design Engineer at Tusaş since 2022.
Can Çivi, born in 1987, graduated from Manisa Celal Bayar University in 2009 with a degree in Mechanical Engineer. He completed Master of Science and Doctoral study in Mechanical Engineering Department. He has been working as Assoc. Prof. Dr. Celal Bayar University Mechanical Engineering Department.
Gökhan Eyici, born in 1990, graduated from Dumlupınar University in 2012 with a bachelor degree in Mechanical Education Machining Teaching. He completed in 2019 a Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Manisa Celal Bayar University. He completed his engineering completion training in 2020 and became an engineer. He has been working as the Manisa Celal Bayar University Laboratory Manager (Mechanical Engineering) since 2014.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our special thanks to Döktaş Casting Corporation Manisa, Turkey for their valuable contributions in casting and test sample manufacturing.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest
-
Research funding: None declared
-
Data availability: Not applicable.
References
[1] S. Suresh, Fatigue of Materials, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1998.Suche in Google Scholar
[2] A. Carpinteri, Fatigue Crack Propagation in Metallic Structures, Amsterdam-Lausanne-New York-Oxford- Shannon-Tokyo, Elsevier Science, 1994.Suche in Google Scholar
[3] Y. L. Lee, Fatigue Testing and Analysis: Theory and Practice, vol. 13, Butterworth, Heinemann, 2005.Suche in Google Scholar
[4] Y. Ayaz and Ç. Serif, “Mechanical behavior of butt curved adhesive joints subjected to bending,” Materialpruefung/Mater. Test., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 639–644, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0089.Suche in Google Scholar
[5] P. V. M. B. J. Zerres, “Crack growth behaviour of the aluminium alloy AlMg4.5Mn at proportional and non-proportional fatigue loading,” Materialpruefung, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 109–117, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar
[6] D. K. Koli, G. Agnihotri, and R. Purohit, “Advanced aluminium matrix composites: the critical need of automotive and aerospace engineering fields,” in Materials Today: Proceedings. 4th National Conference on Processing and Characterization of Materials (NCPCM 2014), Rourkela, NIT Rourkela, 2015, pp. 3032–3041.10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.290Suche in Google Scholar
[7] P. Rambabu, N. Eswara Prasad, V. V. Kutumbarao, and R. J. H. Wanhill, “Aluminium alloys for aerospace applications,” in Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies. Indian Institute of Metals Series, N. Prasad and R. Wanhill, Eds., Singapore, Springer, 2017.10.1007/978-981-10-2134-3_2Suche in Google Scholar
[8] S. Ji, W. Yang, F. Gao, D. Watson, and Z. Fan, “Effect of iron on the microstructure and mechanical property of Al-Mg-Si-Mn and Al-Mg-Si diecast alloys,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, vol. 564, pp. 130–139, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.095.Suche in Google Scholar
[9] R. Doglione, P. Di Geronimo, and A. Morano, “Application of T6 heat treatment on the AlSi9Cu3 (Fe) casting alloy and the effect of copper content,” Am. J. Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 64–70, 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
[10] K. Labisz, L. A. Dobrzański, and J. Konieczny, “Anodization of cast aluminium alloys produced by different casting methods,” Arch. Foundry Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 45–50, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar
[11] M. Gandolfi, M. G. C. Xavier, L. F. Gomes, R. A. V. Reyes, A. Garcia, and J. E. Spinelli, “Relationship between microstructure evolution and tensile properties of AlSi10Mg alloys with varying mg content and solidification cooling rates,” Metals, vol. 11, no. 7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/met11071019.Suche in Google Scholar
[12]] B. Venu Madhav, A. Ahad Mohiuddin, and M. Atifuddin, “Comparison of mechanical properties of AlSiMg alloy with varied composition,” Int. J. Eng. Technol. Res., vol. 4, pp. 12–19, [Online]. Available from: www.iaster.com.Suche in Google Scholar
[13] P. P. Seth, O. Parkash, and D. Kumar, “Structure and mechanical behavior of in situ developed Mg 2 Si phase in magnesium and aluminum alloys–a review.” RSC Adv. vol. 10, no. 61, pp. 37327–37345, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA02744H.10.1039/D0RA02744HSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[14] J. Fiocchi, A. Tuissi, and C. A. Biffi, “Heat treatment of aluminium alloys produced by laser powder bed fusion: A review.” Mater. Des, vol. 204, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109651.10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109651Suche in Google Scholar
[15] Q. Zhang, Y. Zhu, X. Gao, Y. Wu, and C. Hutchinson, “Training high-strength aluminum alloys to withstand fatigue,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19071-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] M. F. I. A. Imam, M. S. Rahman, and M. Z. H. Khan, “Influence of heat treatment on fatigue and fracture behavior of aluminium alloy,” J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 730–742, 2015.Suche in Google Scholar
[17] Y. X. Gan and R. A. Overfelt, “Fatigue property of semisolid A357 aluminum alloy under different heat treatment conditions,” J. Mater. Sci., vol. 41, no. 22, pp. 7537–7544, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0838-5.Suche in Google Scholar
[18] A. N. Abood, A. H. Saleh, and Z. W. Abdullah, “Effect of heat treatment on strain life of aluminum alloy AA 6061,” J. Mater. Sci. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5539/jmsr.v2n2p51.Suche in Google Scholar
[19] A. Fakioglu, D. Özyürek, and R. Yilmaz, “Effects of different heat treatment conditions on fatigue behavior of AA7075 alloy,” High Temp. Mater. Processes, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 345–351, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1515/htmp-2012-0146.Suche in Google Scholar
[20] J. Schijve, Fatigue of Structures and Materials, Netherlands, Springer, 2009.10.1007/978-1-4020-6808-9Suche in Google Scholar
[21] N. Tahralı and F. Dikmen, Reliability and Life Calculations for Machine Elements, İstanbul, Yıldız Technical University Press, 2004.Suche in Google Scholar
[22] L. Liang, X. Pan, G. Wang, H. Zhang, and H. Zhang, “Microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted AlSi7Mg.” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1939, no. 1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1939/1/012041.Suche in Google Scholar
[23] G. Mrówka, J. Sieniawski, A. Nowotnik, G. Mrówka-Nowotnik, J. Sieniawski, and A. Nowotnik, “Effect of heat treatment on tensile and fracture toughness properties of 6082 alloy CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Effect of heat treatment on tensile and fracture toughness properties of 6082 alloy,” 2009. [Online]. Available from: www.journalamme.org.Suche in Google Scholar
[24] J. E. Shigley, Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design, 9th ed. New York, NY, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar
[25] R. Wagener, M. Scurria, H. Kaufmann, and T. Melz, “Influence on the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured aluminum structures,” Procedia Struct. Integr., vol.19, pp. 380–387, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.041.Suche in Google Scholar
[26] M. Bayraktar, N. Tahrali, and R. Guclu, “Reliability and fatigue life evaluation of railway axles,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 671–679, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-1219-1.Suche in Google Scholar
[27] S. N. Aqida, M. I. Ghazali, and J. Hashim, “Effect of porosity on mechanical properties of metal matrix composite: an overview,” J. Teknol., vol. 40, pp. 17–32, 2004.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- A comparison of recent optimization algorithms for build orientation problems in additive manufacturing
- Enhancing the performance of a additive manufactured battery holder using a coupled artificial neural network with a hybrid flood algorithm and water wave algorithm
- Numerical study on surface treatment of vibration-impact composite electric spark based on ABAQUS
- ANN modeling of tincal ore dehydration
- Capacitive voltage effect at a resistive sintering system container and its electrical model
- Tensile testing of S690QL1 HSS welded joint heterogeneous zones using small scale specimens and indentation methods
- Influence of thinner flaked Al powder with larger diameter on the distribution of B4C particles and tensile properties of B4C/Al composite
- Hydrogen susceptibility of Al 5083 under ultra-high strain rate ballistic loading
- Mechanical and metallurgical properties of a glass fiber-reinforced Al7075 hybrid composite produced by infiltration and after aging and abrasion
- Rotating bending fatigue behavior of high-pressure diecast AlSi10MgMn alloy based on T5 heat treatment parameters
- Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending
- Effect of Zr content on the microstructure, mechanical properties, electrochemical behavior, and biocompatibility of Mg–3Zn–xZr alloy using powder metallurgy
- Effect of concentration on PVA solutions and its usage in recycling carbon fiber/polyamide 12 prepregs
- Optimization of cutting parameters in manufacturing of polymeric materials for flexible two-phase thermal management systems
- Growth kinetics of Fe2B layer formed on the surface of borided AISI M2 high-speed steel
- Influence of strut angle and radius on the energy absorption and failure mechanisms in 3-strut, 4-strut and 6-strut lattice structures
- Microstructure and mechanical properties of similar and dissimilar resistance spot welded DC04 and HRP6222 (DD11) steels
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- A comparison of recent optimization algorithms for build orientation problems in additive manufacturing
- Enhancing the performance of a additive manufactured battery holder using a coupled artificial neural network with a hybrid flood algorithm and water wave algorithm
- Numerical study on surface treatment of vibration-impact composite electric spark based on ABAQUS
- ANN modeling of tincal ore dehydration
- Capacitive voltage effect at a resistive sintering system container and its electrical model
- Tensile testing of S690QL1 HSS welded joint heterogeneous zones using small scale specimens and indentation methods
- Influence of thinner flaked Al powder with larger diameter on the distribution of B4C particles and tensile properties of B4C/Al composite
- Hydrogen susceptibility of Al 5083 under ultra-high strain rate ballistic loading
- Mechanical and metallurgical properties of a glass fiber-reinforced Al7075 hybrid composite produced by infiltration and after aging and abrasion
- Rotating bending fatigue behavior of high-pressure diecast AlSi10MgMn alloy based on T5 heat treatment parameters
- Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending
- Effect of Zr content on the microstructure, mechanical properties, electrochemical behavior, and biocompatibility of Mg–3Zn–xZr alloy using powder metallurgy
- Effect of concentration on PVA solutions and its usage in recycling carbon fiber/polyamide 12 prepregs
- Optimization of cutting parameters in manufacturing of polymeric materials for flexible two-phase thermal management systems
- Growth kinetics of Fe2B layer formed on the surface of borided AISI M2 high-speed steel
- Influence of strut angle and radius on the energy absorption and failure mechanisms in 3-strut, 4-strut and 6-strut lattice structures
- Microstructure and mechanical properties of similar and dissimilar resistance spot welded DC04 and HRP6222 (DD11) steels
