Home Technology Hydrogen susceptibility of Al 5083 under ultra-high strain rate ballistic loading
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Hydrogen susceptibility of Al 5083 under ultra-high strain rate ballistic loading

  • Mehmet Furkan Baltacioglu

    Mehmet Furkan Baltacioglu received his BSc degree in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Türkiye, in 2013. He received his MSc degree in the Department of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri, Türkiye, in 2018. He is PhD student in the Department of Materials Science and Mechanical Engineering, Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri, Türkiye. His research interest includes hydrogen embrittlement, microstructure-mechanical property relationship, and molecular dynamics simulations.

         , Farzin Mozafari

    Farzin Mozafari received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from Tehran Azad University, Iran, in 2007. In 2020, he earned his PhD from the Department of Mechanics and Material Engineering at the National University of Malaysia. Following 2 years as a Marie Skłodowska Curie Postdoctoral Fellow at Bilkent University under the Horizon 2020 Brain Circulation Scheme, he is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Abdullah Gul University.

         , Murat Aydin

    Murat Aydin received his BSs, MSc and PhD degrees from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye in 2007, 2009 and 2014, respectively. He joined the Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye in 2009. Currently, Dr Aydın is Associate Professor in Aeronautical Engineering Department. His research interests include terminal ballistics, composite materials, and finite element analysis.

         , Baris Cetin

    Baris Cetin graduated from Middle East Technical University, Mechanical Engineering Department in 2003. By January 2017, he completed his M.Sc. at Atılım University, Manufacturing Engineering Department and he received his Ph.D. degree from the Dept. of Mechanical Eng. at Atılım University. He has professional experience in theory of plasticity, metal forming processes, mechanical characterization, quantitative metallography, and Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS). He has several journal articles and conference papers regarding to these scientific fields.

         , Aynur Didem Oktan

    Aynur Didem OKTAN received her BSc and MSc degrees in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baskent University, Ankara, Türkiye, in 2016 and 2019, respectively. She currently continues her PhD studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Başkent University and works as a research assistant in the same department. Her research interests include optical system design, optical imaging and analysis, and biomedical optics.

         , Atanur Teoman

    Atanur Teoman received his BSc degree in the Department of Mechanical Engineering Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversity, Eskişehir, Turkiye. He has been working in the private sector and Eskisehir Osmangazi University Defence Technologies Research Group regarding ballistic, composite, and finite analysis since 2019. His research interests include composite, ballistic, armor system, resin and adhesive, and finite element analysis.

         , Yang Li

    Yang Li received his PhD degree in Solid Mechanics from University of Paris-Saclay in France, in 2019. He then worked as a postdoctoral researcher at University of California, Los Angeles in US from 2020 to 2023. He is currently associate Professor in School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Shanghai University in China. Since 2019, he published 16 peer reviewed papers in prestigious journals. His research interests include plasticity and dislocation dynamics.

         and Burak Bal

    Burak Bal received his PhD degree in Department of Mechanical Engineering from Koc University, in 2015. He is currently associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Abdullah Gül University in Türkiye. His research interest lies in the broad area of multiscale experimental and computational mechanics of materials under extreme environments.

     EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 25, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
Materials Testing
From the journal Materials Testing Volume 66 Issue 10

Abstract

The effect of hydrogen on the ballistic performance of aluminum (Al) 5083H131 was examined both experimentally and numerically in this study. Ballistics tests were conducted at a 30° obliquity in accordance with the ballistic test standard MIL-DTL-46027 K. The strike velocities of projectiles were ranged from 240 m s−1 to 500 m s−1 level in the room temperature. Electrochemical hydrogen charging method was utilized to introduce hydrogen into material. Chemical composition of material was analyzed using energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Instant camera pictures were captured using high-speed camera to compare H-uncharged and H-charged specimen ballistics tests. The volume loss in partially penetrated specimens were assessed using the 3D laser scanning method. Microstructural examinations were conducted utilizing scanning electron microscopy (SEM). It was observed that with the increased deformation rate, the dominance of the HEDE mechanism over HELP became evident. Furthermore, the experimental findings were corroborated through numerical methods employing finite element analysis (FEM) along with the Johnson–Cook plasticity model and failure criteria. Inverse optimization technique was employed to implement and fine-tune the Johnson–Cook parameters for H-charged conditions. Upon comparing the experimental and numerical outcomes, a high degree of consistency was observed, indicating the effective performance of the model.

Keywords: ballistics tests; finite element analysis; hydrogen embrittlement; microstructure
Corresponding author: Burak Bal, Mechanical Engineering Department, Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri, 38080, Türkiye, E-mail:

Funding source: Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)

Award Identifier / Grant number: 1059B192000774

About the authors

Mehmet Furkan Baltacioglu

Mehmet Furkan Baltacioglu received his BSc degree in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Türkiye, in 2013. He received his MSc degree in the Department of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri, Türkiye, in 2018. He is PhD student in the Department of Materials Science and Mechanical Engineering, Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri, Türkiye. His research interest includes hydrogen embrittlement, microstructure-mechanical property relationship, and molecular dynamics simulations.

Farzin Mozafari

Farzin Mozafari received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from Tehran Azad University, Iran, in 2007. In 2020, he earned his PhD from the Department of Mechanics and Material Engineering at the National University of Malaysia. Following 2 years as a Marie Skłodowska Curie Postdoctoral Fellow at Bilkent University under the Horizon 2020 Brain Circulation Scheme, he is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Abdullah Gul University.

Murat Aydin

Murat Aydin received his BSs, MSc and PhD degrees from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye in 2007, 2009 and 2014, respectively. He joined the Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye in 2009. Currently, Dr Aydın is Associate Professor in Aeronautical Engineering Department. His research interests include terminal ballistics, composite materials, and finite element analysis.

Baris Cetin

Baris Cetin graduated from Middle East Technical University, Mechanical Engineering Department in 2003. By January 2017, he completed his M.Sc. at Atılım University, Manufacturing Engineering Department and he received his Ph.D. degree from the Dept. of Mechanical Eng. at Atılım University. He has professional experience in theory of plasticity, metal forming processes, mechanical characterization, quantitative metallography, and Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS). He has several journal articles and conference papers regarding to these scientific fields.

Aynur Didem Oktan

Aynur Didem OKTAN received her BSc and MSc degrees in the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baskent University, Ankara, Türkiye, in 2016 and 2019, respectively. She currently continues her PhD studies in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Başkent University and works as a research assistant in the same department. Her research interests include optical system design, optical imaging and analysis, and biomedical optics.

Atanur Teoman

Atanur Teoman received his BSc degree in the Department of Mechanical Engineering Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversity, Eskişehir, Turkiye. He has been working in the private sector and Eskisehir Osmangazi University Defence Technologies Research Group regarding ballistic, composite, and finite analysis since 2019. His research interests include composite, ballistic, armor system, resin and adhesive, and finite element analysis.

Yang Li

Yang Li received his PhD degree in Solid Mechanics from University of Paris-Saclay in France, in 2019. He then worked as a postdoctoral researcher at University of California, Los Angeles in US from 2020 to 2023. He is currently associate Professor in School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Shanghai University in China. Since 2019, he published 16 peer reviewed papers in prestigious journals. His research interests include plasticity and dislocation dynamics.

Burak Bal

Burak Bal received his PhD degree in Department of Mechanical Engineering from Koc University, in 2015. He is currently associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Abdullah Gül University in Türkiye. His research interest lies in the broad area of multiscale experimental and computational mechanics of materials under extreme environments.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: B. Bal acknowledges the financial support by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) BIDEB-2219 Postdoctoral Research Program under Project No. 1059B192000774.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

[1] M. C. Santos, A. R. Machado, W. F. Sales, M. A. S. Barrozo, and E. O. Ezugwu, “Machining of aluminum alloys: a review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 86, nos. 9–12, pp. 3067–3080, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8431-9.Search in Google Scholar

[2] E. Buray-Mihälyi, E. Czoboly, and Z. Buray, “Fracture behaviour and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy plates,” Mater. Test., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 316–319, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-1975-170906.Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. V. Jebaraj, K. V. V. Aditya, T. S. Kumar, L. Ajaykumar, and C. R. Deepak, “Mechanical and corrosion behaviour of aluminum alloy 5083 and its weldment for marine applications,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1470–1478, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.505.Search in Google Scholar

[4] K. Ozel, C. S. Cetinarslan, and M. Sahin, “Mechanical properties of friction stir welded 5083 aluminum alloys,” Mater. Test., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 64–68, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110965.Search in Google Scholar

[5] S. N. Patankar and T. M. Jen, “Strain rate insensitive plasticity in aluminum alloy 5083,” Scr. Mater., vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1255–1261, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00017-7.Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Jaume, M. J. F. Marques, M. L. Délia, and R. Basséguy, “Surface modification of 5083 aluminum-magnesium induced by marine microorganisms,” Corros. Sci., vol. 194, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109934.Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. L. Holtz, P. S. Pao, R. A. Bayles, T. M. Longazel, and R. Goswami, “Corrosion-fatigue behavior of aluminum alloy 5083-H131 sensitized at 448 K (175 C),” Proc. Metall. Mater. Trans. Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., vol. 43, 2012, pp. 2839–2849.10.1007/s11661-011-0866-xSearch in Google Scholar

[8] K. Hirayama, et al.., “Damage micromechanisms of stress corrosion cracking in Al-Mg alloy with high magnesium content,” Corros. Sci., vol. 184, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109343.Search in Google Scholar

[9] B. Bal, “Determination of material response and optimization of johnson-cook damage parameters of aluminium 7075 alloy,” Selcuk Univ. J. Eng., Sci. Technol., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 343–354, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15317/scitech.2018.137.Search in Google Scholar

[10] C. N. Panagopoulos and E. P. Georgiou, “The effect of hydrogen charging on the mechanical behaviour of 5083 wrought aluminum alloy,” Corros. Sci., vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 4443–4451, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2007.03.047.Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. P. Georgiou, J. P. Celis, and C. N. Panagopoulos, “The effect of cold rolling on the hydrogen susceptibility of 5083 aluminum alloy,” Metals (Basel), vol. 7, no. 11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/met7110451.Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. H. Ai, M. L. C. Lim, and J. R. Scully, “Effective hydrogen diffusion in aluminum alloy 5083-H131 as a function of orientation and degree of sensitization,” Corrosion, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 1225–1239, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5006/0987.Search in Google Scholar

[13] S.-J. Kim, M.-S. Han, and S.-K. Jang, “Electrochemical characteristics of Al-Mg alloy in seawater for leisure ship: stress corrosion cracking and hydrogen embrittlement,” Korean J. Chem. Eng., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 250–257, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-009-0042-9.Search in Google Scholar

[14] S. J. Kim, S. K. Kim, and J. C. Park, “The corrosion and mechanical properties of Al alloy 5083-H116 in metal inert gas welding based on slow strain rate test,” Surf. Coat. Technol., vol. 205, no. SUPPL. 1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.04.039.Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. Pradhan, M. Vishwakarma, and S. K. Dwivedi, “A review: the impact of hydrogen embrittlement on the fatigue strength of high strength steel,” Mater Today Proc., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 3015–3019, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.627.Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. F. Baltacioglu, B. Cetin, and B. Bal, “The effect of strain rate on the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of aluminum 7075,” J. Eng. Mater. Technol., vol. 145, no. 2, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056158.Search in Google Scholar

[17] S. K. Dwivedi and M. Vishwakarma, “Hydrogen embrittlement in different materials: a review,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 46, pp. 21603–21616, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.201.Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. K. Dwivedi and M. Vishwakarma, “Effect of hydrogen in advanced high strength steel materials,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 51, pp. 28007–28030, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.149.Search in Google Scholar

[19] P. Xu, C. Li, W. Li, M. Zhu, W. Li, and K. Zhang, “Effect of microstructure on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility in quenching-partitioning-tempering steel,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, vol. 831, no. September 2021, p. 142046, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.142046.Search in Google Scholar

[20] F. Özen, A. İlhan, H. T. Sezan, E. İlhan, and S. Aslanlar, “Effect of the galvanization process on the fatigue life of high strength steel compression springs,” Mater. Test., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 226–230, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2020-0032.Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Rajabipour and R. E. Melchers, “Service life of corrosion pitted pipes subject to fatigue loading and hydrogen embrittlement,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 17, pp. 8440–8450, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.063.Search in Google Scholar

[22] T. Pinger, J. Riedel, A. Diehl, and R. Mayrhofer, “Investigation of the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of steel components during thin-film hot-dip galvanizing,” Materialpruefung/Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 667–677, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-2002.Search in Google Scholar

[23] O. Gosheva, G. Andersohn, and M. Oechsner, “Comparative study of the testing approaches for the susceptibility of high-strength fasteners to environmental hydrogen embrittlement (EHE),” Mater. Test., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 251–256, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111147.Search in Google Scholar

[24] S. Hereñú, A. Armas, E. Brandaleze, and G. Mansilla, “Hydrogen influence on the mechanical behaviour of high strength steel,” Mater. Test., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 610–614, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110168.Search in Google Scholar

[25] B. Kroeger, H. Hetzner, S. G. Klose, T. Mehner, R. Holbein, and T. Lampke, “Mechanical test procedures for the evaluation of hydrogen-assisted damage in high-strength steel,” Mater. Test., vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1061–1071, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111432.Search in Google Scholar

[26] S. Corsinovi, L. Bacchi, M. Mastroianni, N. Bigollo, and R. Valentini, “Hydrogen embrittlement in high strength fasteners: comparison between bainitic and tempered martensitic steels,” Eng Fail Anal, vol. 152, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107474.Search in Google Scholar

[27] L. Deconinck, M. T. Villa Vidaller, E. Bernardo Quejido, E. A. Jägle, T. Depover, and K. Verbeken, “In-situ hydrogen embrittlement evaluation of as-built and heat treated laser powder bed fused Ti-6Al-4V versus conventionally cold rolled Ti-6Al-4V,” Addit. Manuf., vol. 76, p. 103768, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103768.Search in Google Scholar

[28] B. Bal, I. Sahin, A. Uzun, and D. Canadinc, “A new venue toward predicting the role of hydrogen embrittlement on metallic materials,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci., vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 5409–5422, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3708-z.Search in Google Scholar

[29] B. Bal, B. Okdem, F. C. Bayram, and M. Aydin, “A detailed investigation of the effect of hydrogen on the mechanical response and microstructure of Al 7075 alloy under medium strain rate impact loading,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 46, pp. 25509–25522, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.241.Search in Google Scholar

[30] O. Gosheva, G. Andersohn, and M. Oechsner, “Comparative study of the testing approaches for the susceptibility of high-strength fasteners to environmental hydrogen embrittlement (EHE),” Mater. Test., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 251–256, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111147.Search in Google Scholar

[31] U. S. Meda, N. Bhat, A. Pandey, K. N. Subramanya, and M. A. Lourdu Antony Raj, “Challenges associated with hydrogen storage systems due to the hydrogen embrittlement of high strength steels,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 47, pp. 17894–17913, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.01.292.Search in Google Scholar

[32] C. Park, N. Kang, and S. Liu, “Effect of grain size on the resistance to hydrogen embrittlement of API 2W Grade 60 steels using in situ slow-strain-rate testing,” Corros. Sci., vol. 128, pp. 33–41, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.032.Search in Google Scholar

[33] K. Takasawa, R. Ikeda, N. Ishikawa, and R. Ishigaki, “Effects of grain size and dislocation density on the susceptibility to high-pressure hydrogen environment embrittlement of high-strength low-alloy steels,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 2669–2675, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.099.Search in Google Scholar

[34] F. Galliano, E. Andrieu, J. M. Cloué, G. Odemer, and C. Blanc, “Effect of temperature on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of alloy 718 in Light Water Reactor environment,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 33, pp. 21371–21378, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.211.Search in Google Scholar

[35] B. Bal, M. Koyama, G. Gerstein, H. J. Maier, and K. Tsuzaki, “Effect of strain rate on hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of twinning-induced plasticity steel pre-charged with high-pressure hydrogen gas,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 34, pp. 15362–15372, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.259.Search in Google Scholar

[36] T. Michler and J. Naumann, “Hydrogen environment embrittlement of austenitic stainless steels at low temperatures,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 2111–2122, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.021.Search in Google Scholar

[37] R. Matsumoto, S. T. Oyinbo, M. Vijendran, and S. Taketomi, “Hydrogen effect on the mobility of edge dislocation in α-iron: a long-timescale molecular dynamics simulation,” ISIJ Int., vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 2402–2409, 2022, https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2022-311.Search in Google Scholar

[38] A. P. Newbery, S. R. Nutt, and E. J. Lavernia, “Multi-scale Al 5083 for military vehicles with improved performance,” JOM, vol. 58, pp. 56–61, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0216-4.Search in Google Scholar

[39] X. W. Chen, X. L. Huang, and G. J. Liang, “Comparative analysis of perforation models of metallic plates by rigid sharp-nosed projectiles,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 613–621, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.12.005.Search in Google Scholar

[40] S. M. Aceves, G. D. Berry, J. Martinez-Frias, and F. Espinosa-Loza, “Vehicular storage of hydrogen in insulated pressure vessels,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 31, no. 15, pp. 2274–2283, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.02.019.Search in Google Scholar

[41] C. P. Fowler, A. C. Orifici, and C. H. Wang, “A review of toroidal composite pressure vessel optimisation and damage tolerant design for high pressure gaseous fuel storage,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 47, pp. 22067–22089, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.039.Search in Google Scholar

[42] S. Kural and M. Ayvaz, “The ballistic behavior of type 1 metallic pressurized hydrogen storage tanks against ballistic threats,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 44, pp. 20284–20292, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.126.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Q. Zhao, X. Xiao, R. Ge, Y. Zhang, X. Chen, and B. Jia, “Experimental-numerical study on ballistic impact behavior of 316L austenitic stainless steel plates against blunt and ogival projectiles,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 23, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.285.Search in Google Scholar

[44] A. Dorogoy, D. Rittel, and A. Brill, “Experimentation and modeling of inclined ballistic impact in thick polycarbonate plates,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 804–814, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.05.001.Search in Google Scholar

[45] H. W. Meyer and D. S. Kleponis, “Modeling the high strain rate behavior of titanium undergoing ballistic impact and penetration,” 2001. [Online]. Available at: www.eisevier.com]loeate/ijimpeng.10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00107-5Search in Google Scholar

[46] R. Bobbili, B. Ramakrishna, and V. Madhu, “Dynamic compressive behavior and fracture modeling of Titanium alloy IMI 834,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 714, pp. 225–231, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.228.Search in Google Scholar

[47] S. Choudhary, P. K. Singh, S. Khare, K. Kumar, P. Mahajan, and R. K. Verma, “Ballistic impact behaviour of newly developed armour grade steel: an experimental and numerical study,” Int J Impact Eng, vol. 140, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103557.Search in Google Scholar

[48] P. Ranaweera, M. R. Bambach, D. Weerasinghe, and D. Mohotti, “Ballistic impact response of monolithic steel and tri-metallic steel–titanium–aluminium armour to nonrigid NATO FMJ M80 projectiles,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 182, no. A, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.110200.Search in Google Scholar

[49] S. E. Alkhatib, S. Xu, G. Lu, A. Karrech, and T. B. Sercombe, “Dynamic constitutive behavior of LPBFed metal alloys,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 25, pp. 581–592, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.252.Search in Google Scholar

[50] L. Chang, S. Yuan, X. Huang, and Z. Cai, “Determination of Johnson-Cook damage model for 7xxx laminated aluminum alloy and simulation application,” Mater. Today Commun., vol. 34, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105224.Search in Google Scholar

[51] T. Hong, F. Ding, F. Chen, H. Zhang, Q. Zeng, and J. Wang, “Study on the fracture behaviour of 6061 aluminum alloy extruded tube during different stress conditions,” Crystals (Basel), vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst13030489.Search in Google Scholar

[52] R. Rai, G. Kumar, S. Dagar, V. Somashekar, C. A. Mboreha, and P. Modi, “Numerical simulation of ballistic impact on aluminium 5083-H116 plate with Johnson cook plasticity model,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 46, pp. 10619–10627, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.373.Search in Google Scholar

[53] T. Børvik, M. J. Forrestal, O. S. Hopperstad, T. L. Warren, and M. Langseth, “Perforation of AA5083-H116 aluminium plates with conical-nose steel projectiles - calculations,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 426–437, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.02.004.Search in Google Scholar

[54] G. Po, et al.., “A phenomenological dislocation mobility law for bcc metals,” Acta Mater., vol. 119, pp. 123–135, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.016.Search in Google Scholar

[55] G. Yi, K. C. Littrell, J. D. Poplawsky, D. A. Cullen, E. Sundberg, and M. L. Free, “Characterization of the effects of different tempers and aging temperatures on the precipitation behavior of Al-Mg (5.25 at.%)-Mn alloys,” Mater. Des., vol. 118, pp. 22–35, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.021.Search in Google Scholar

[56] I. B. Tuğluca, M. Koyama, B. Bal, D. Canadinc, E. Akiyama, and K. Tsuzaki, “High-concentration carbon assists plasticity-driven hydrogen embrittlement in a Fe-high Mn steel with a relatively high stacking fault energy,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, vol. 717, pp. 78–84, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.087.Search in Google Scholar

[57] MIL-DTL-46027K(MR), “Detail specification armor plate, aluminum alloy,” Weldable 5083, 5456, & 5059, [Online]. Available at: http://assist.daps.dla.mil/.Search in Google Scholar

[58] “MIL-DTL-46593B (MR), American society for quality, 6 july 2006.,” 2006. [Online]. Available at: www.asme.org.Search in Google Scholar

[59] M. A.-B. Ebrahim and M. Abdel-Bary Ebrahim, “3D laser scanners’ techniques overview,”, 2015. [Online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282753883.Search in Google Scholar

[60] G. R. Johnson and W. H. Cook, “Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 1985, https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9.Search in Google Scholar

[61] J. W. Hancock and A. C. Mackenzie, “On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 24, nos. 2–3, pp. 147–160, 1976, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(76)90024-7.Search in Google Scholar

[62] R. Rai, G. Kumar, S. Dagar, V. Somashekar, C. A. Mboreha, and P. Modi, “Numerical simulation of ballistic impact on aluminium 5083-H116 plate with Johnson cook plasticity model,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 46, no. 20, pp. 10619–10627, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.01.373.Search in Google Scholar

[63] T. J. Jang, J. B. Kim, and H. Shin, “Identification of plastic constitutive Johnson–Cook model parameters by optimization-based inverse method,” J. Comput. Des. Eng., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1082–1097, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1093/JCDE/QWAB033.Search in Google Scholar

[64] J. Ning and S. Y. Liang, “Inverse identification of Johnson-Cook material constants based on modified chip formation model and iterative gradient search using temperature and force measurements,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 102, nos. 9–12, pp. 2865–2876, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-019-03286-0/METRICS.Search in Google Scholar

[65] N. Ojal, H. P. Cherukuri, T. L. Schmitz, K. T. Devlugt, and A. W. Jaycox, “A combined experimental and numerical approach that eliminates the non-uniqueness associated with the Johnson-Cook parameters obtained using inverse methods,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 120, nos. 3–4, pp. 2373–2384, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-021-08640-9/TABLES/12.Search in Google Scholar

[66] J. Pujana, P. J. Arrazola, R. M’Saoubi, and H. Chandrasekaran, “Analysis of the inverse identification of constitutive equations applied in orthogonal cutting process,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 47, no. 14, pp. 2153–2161, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMACHTOOLS.2007.04.012.Search in Google Scholar

[67] G. Chen, C. Ren, W. Yu, X. Yang, and L. Zhang, “Application of genetic algorithms for optimizing the Johnson–Cook constitutive model parameters when simulating the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V machining process,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B J. Eng. Manuf., vol. 226, no. 8, pp. 1287–1297, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405412447735.Search in Google Scholar

[68] A. V. Bochkaryova, Y. V. Li, S. A. Barannikova, and L. B. Zuev, “The effect of hydrogen embrittlement on the mechanical properties of aluminum alloy,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 71, no. 1, p. 012057, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/71/1/012057.Search in Google Scholar

[69] B. Bal, B. Çetin, F. C. Bayram, and E. Billur, “Effect of hydrogen on fracture locus of Fe–16Mn–0.6C–2.15Al TWIP steel,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 58, pp. 34227–34240, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2020.09.083.Search in Google Scholar

[70] E. Kosedag, M. Aydin, and R. Ekici, “Effect of stacking sequence and metal volume fraction on the ballistic impact behaviors of ARALL fiber-metal laminates: an experimental study,” Polym. Compos., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 1536–1545, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26474.Search in Google Scholar

[71] E. Kosedag and R. Ekici, “Low-velocity and ballistic impact resistances of particle reinforced metal–matrix composites: an experimental study,” J. Compos. Mater., vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 991–1002, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983211068101.Search in Google Scholar

[72] M. B. Djukic, G. M. Bakic, V. Sijacki Zeravcic, A. Sedmak, and B. Rajicic, “The synergistic action and interplay of hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms in steels and iron: localized plasticity and decohesion,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 216, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106528.Search in Google Scholar

[73] J. Dean, C. S. Dunleavy, P. M. Brown, and T. W. Clyne, “Energy absorption during projectile perforation of thin steel plates and the kinetic energy of ejected fragments,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 36, nos. 10–11, pp. 1250–1258, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.05.002.Search in Google Scholar

[74] B. Dodd, B. Dodd, and F. Coghe, “Damage caused to metals by kinetic and chemical energy projectiles Security and Use of Innovative Technologies against Terrorism Damage caused to metals by kinetic and chemical energy projectiles”, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1667.0881.Search in Google Scholar

[75] Rioja, et al., Methods of Aging Aluminum Alloys to Achieve Improved Ballistics Performance, 2014, Patent NO: US 8,758,530 B2.Search in Google Scholar

[76] M. A. Khan, et al.., “Microstructure characterization of 7055-T6, 6061-T6511 and 7A52-T6 Al alloys subjected to ballistic impact against heavy tungsten alloy projectile,” Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1484–1496, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2019.10.001.Search in Google Scholar
Published Online: 2024-09-25
Published in Print: 2024-10-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. A comparison of recent optimization algorithms for build orientation problems in additive manufacturing
  3. Enhancing the performance of a additive manufactured battery holder using a coupled artificial neural network with a hybrid flood algorithm and water wave algorithm
  4. Numerical study on surface treatment of vibration-impact composite electric spark based on ABAQUS
  5. ANN modeling of tincal ore dehydration
  6. Capacitive voltage effect at a resistive sintering system container and its electrical model
  7. Tensile testing of S690QL1 HSS welded joint heterogeneous zones using small scale specimens and indentation methods
  8. Influence of thinner flaked Al powder with larger diameter on the distribution of B4C particles and tensile properties of B4C/Al composite
  9. Hydrogen susceptibility of Al 5083 under ultra-high strain rate ballistic loading
  10. Mechanical and metallurgical properties of a glass fiber-reinforced Al7075 hybrid composite produced by infiltration and after aging and abrasion
  11. Rotating bending fatigue behavior of high-pressure diecast AlSi10MgMn alloy based on T5 heat treatment parameters
  12. Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending
  13. Effect of Zr content on the microstructure, mechanical properties, electrochemical behavior, and biocompatibility of Mg–3Zn–xZr alloy using powder metallurgy
  14. Effect of concentration on PVA solutions and its usage in recycling carbon fiber/polyamide 12 prepregs
  15. Optimization of cutting parameters in manufacturing of polymeric materials for flexible two-phase thermal management systems
  16. Growth kinetics of Fe2B layer formed on the surface of borided AISI M2 high-speed steel
  17. Influence of strut angle and radius on the energy absorption and failure mechanisms in 3-strut, 4-strut and 6-strut lattice structures
  18. Microstructure and mechanical properties of similar and dissimilar resistance spot welded DC04 and HRP6222 (DD11) steels
https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2024-0056
Keywords for this article
ballistics tests; finite element analysis; hydrogen embrittlement; microstructure

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. A comparison of recent optimization algorithms for build orientation problems in additive manufacturing
  3. Enhancing the performance of a additive manufactured battery holder using a coupled artificial neural network with a hybrid flood algorithm and water wave algorithm
  4. Numerical study on surface treatment of vibration-impact composite electric spark based on ABAQUS
  5. ANN modeling of tincal ore dehydration
  6. Capacitive voltage effect at a resistive sintering system container and its electrical model
  7. Tensile testing of S690QL1 HSS welded joint heterogeneous zones using small scale specimens and indentation methods
  8. Influence of thinner flaked Al powder with larger diameter on the distribution of B4C particles and tensile properties of B4C/Al composite
  9. Hydrogen susceptibility of Al 5083 under ultra-high strain rate ballistic loading
  10. Mechanical and metallurgical properties of a glass fiber-reinforced Al7075 hybrid composite produced by infiltration and after aging and abrasion
  11. Rotating bending fatigue behavior of high-pressure diecast AlSi10MgMn alloy based on T5 heat treatment parameters
  12. Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending
  13. Effect of Zr content on the microstructure, mechanical properties, electrochemical behavior, and biocompatibility of Mg–3Zn–xZr alloy using powder metallurgy
  14. Effect of concentration on PVA solutions and its usage in recycling carbon fiber/polyamide 12 prepregs
  15. Optimization of cutting parameters in manufacturing of polymeric materials for flexible two-phase thermal management systems
  16. Growth kinetics of Fe2B layer formed on the surface of borided AISI M2 high-speed steel
  17. Influence of strut angle and radius on the energy absorption and failure mechanisms in 3-strut, 4-strut and 6-strut lattice structures
  18. Microstructure and mechanical properties of similar and dissimilar resistance spot welded DC04 and HRP6222 (DD11) steels
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2026 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 14.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2024-0056/html
Scroll to top button