Startseite Technik Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending

  • Furkan Hasan Mesci

    Furkan Hasan Mesci was born in 1996 in Istanbul. He completed his primary, secondary and high school education in Istanbul. He graduated from Doğuş University mechanical engineering department in 2019. He worked as a process design engineer at Altınay Robot Technologies between February 2020 and September 2023. In the same year, he started his master’s degree in the Department of Mechanical Design and Manufacturing at Sakarya University, Department of Mechanical Engineering. He currently works as a method engineer at Parsan Machine.

         und Seçil Eksi

    Associate Prof. Dr. Seçil Eksi was born in 1982 in İstanbul. She works in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Engineering Faculty, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey. She received a B.Sc. and M.Sc. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey, in 2004 and 2006, respectively, and a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey, in 2014. Her research interests include materials, mechanical behavior of material, composite materials, manufacturing, finite element analyses.

     ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. August 2024
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen
Materials Testing
Aus der Zeitschrift Materials Testing Band 66 Heft 10

Abstract

Springback, one of the fundamental properties of parts formed by V bending, is the dimensional deviation caused by elastic recovery. Numerical estimation and compensation of springback is essential because it affects the workpiece’s dimensional accuracy and geometry and will cause serious errors, especially during the assembly process. This study investigated the effects of process parameters such as sheet thickness and die angle on springback behavior on 1,050 aluminum experimentally and numerically. Experiments were planned according to Taguchi’s L9 orthogonal array. Sheet thickness (1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.5 mm) and die angle (90, 135 and 150°), were selected as forming parameters. Springback was calculated after the tests. Optimization of the parameters was evaluated using the signal/noise ratio approach. The effectiveness of parameters on results was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA). It has been observed that the springback angle decreases with increasing sheet thickness, but springback angle decreases with increasing die angles. It has been seen that the experimental and numerical study results confirm each other. The variance analysis determined that the die angle was the most dominant springback parameter (90.9 %). Second is the sheet thickness (5.79 %).

Keywords: aluminum 1050; finite element analysis; optimization; springback; v-bending
Corresponding author: Seçil Eksi, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Türkiye, E-mail:

About the authors

Furkan Hasan Mesci

Furkan Hasan Mesci was born in 1996 in Istanbul. He completed his primary, secondary and high school education in Istanbul. He graduated from Doğuş University mechanical engineering department in 2019. He worked as a process design engineer at Altınay Robot Technologies between February 2020 and September 2023. In the same year, he started his master’s degree in the Department of Mechanical Design and Manufacturing at Sakarya University, Department of Mechanical Engineering. He currently works as a method engineer at Parsan Machine.

Seçil Eksi

Associate Prof. Dr. Seçil Eksi was born in 1982 in İstanbul. She works in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Engineering Faculty, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey. She received a B.Sc. and M.Sc. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey, in 2004 and 2006, respectively, and a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey, in 2014. Her research interests include materials, mechanical behavior of material, composite materials, manufacturing, finite element analyses.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

[1] S. K. Panthi, N. Ramakrishnan, R. Das Gupta, and J. S. Chouhan, “Study of effect of load on springback in sheet metal bending,” Trans. Indian Inst. Met., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-008-0063-9.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] S. H. Oh, D. C. Ahn, and Y. S. Kim, “A study on the mechanical properties and springback of 3D aluminum sheets,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 671–677, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-016-0082-0.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Ş. Gökmen, R. Ertan, and H. G. Özgül, “Effect of temperature and rolling direction on the formability of CP2 and Ti-6Al-4V titanium materials,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1743–1751, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0117.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] V. Esat, H. Darendeliler, and M. I. Gokler, “Finite element analysis of springback in bending of aluminium sheets,” Mater. Des., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 223–229, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-3069(01)00062-0.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] S. K. Panthi, N. Ramakrishnan, M. Ahmed, S. S. Singh, and M. D. Goel, “Finite Element Analysis of sheet metal bending process to predict the springback,” Mater. Des., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 657–662, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.022.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] S. Thipprakmas and W. Phanitwong, “Process parameter design of spring-back and spring-go in V-bending process using Taguchi technique,” Mater. Des., vol. 32, nos. 8–9, pp. 4430–4436, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.069.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] G. Y. Li, M. J. Tan, and K. M. Liew, “Springback analysis for sheet forming processes by explicit finite element method in conjunction with the orthogonal regression analysis,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 36, no. 30, pp. 4653–4668, 1999, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00227-3.Suche in Google Scholar

[8] S. A. Asgari, M. Pereira, B. F. Rolfe, M. Dingle, and P. D. Hodgson, “Statistical analysis of finite element modeling in sheet metal forming and springback analysis,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 3, pp. 129–136, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.073.Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Z. Tek, “An experimental study on the examination of springback of sheet metals with several thicknesses and properties in bending dies,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 145, pp. 109–117, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar

[10] M. Sanei and B. Manafi, “Influence of U-O bending process parameters on the friction coefficient,” Mater. Test., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 265–271, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.110995.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] M. Valinezhad, E. Etemadi, R. Hashemi, and M. Valinezhad, “Experimental and FE analysis on spring-back of copper/aluminum layers sheet for a L-die bending process,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 6, no. 11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab51c8.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] P. V. P. Marcondes, R. A. dos Santos, and S. A. Haus, “The coining force influence on springback in TRIP800 steel V and L-bending processes,” J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 455–463, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0467-5.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Q. Meng, R. Zhai, Y. Zhang, P. Fu, and J. Zhao, “Analysis of springback for multiple bending considering nonlinear unloading-reloading behavior, stress inheritance and Bauschinger effect,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 307, 2022, Art. no. 117657, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117657.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] K. Dilip Kumar, K. K. Appukuttan, V. L. Neelakantha, and P. S. Naik, “Experimental determination of spring back and thinning effect of aluminum sheet metal during L-bending operation,” Mater. Des., vol. 56, pp. 613–619, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.047.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] M. Tekin, R. Ertan, and H. G. Özgül, “Forming evolution of titanium grade2 sheets,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 116–124, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2021-2004.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] A. C. L. Lam, Z. Shi, J. Lin, and X. Huang, “Influences of residual stresses and initial distortion on springback prediction of 7B04-T651 aluminium plates in creep-age forming,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 103, pp. 115–126, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar

[17] H. Hou, G. Zhao, J. Yu, Y. Sun, and H. Li, “Experimental studies and modeling of strain rate- and temperature-dependent springback behavior of hot-deformed aluminum alloys,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 318, 2023, Art. no. 118029, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118029.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] X. Sun, Y. Ji, A. Xiao, S. Wang, and X. Cui, “Influence of single-pulse and high-amplitude current on springback and mechanical properties of AA5052 aluminum alloy sheets,” Mater. Charact., vol. 194, 2022, Art. no. 112337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112337.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Y. Zong, P. Liu, B. Guo, and D. Shan, “Springback evaluation in hot v-bending of Ti-6Al-4V alloy sheets,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 76, pp. 577–585, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6190-z.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] A. Badrish, A. Morchhale, N. Kotkunde, and S. K. Singh, “Parameter optimization in the thermo-mechanical V-bending process to minimize springback of inconel 625 alloy,” Arab J Sci Eng, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 5295–5309, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04395-9.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] M. Wasif, A. Fatima, S. A. Iqbal, M. Tufail, and H. Karim, “Analysis and optimization of springback during the V-bending of hot-rolled high strength steels ( JSH440 )”, J. Eng. Res. Research, vol. 10, no. 3A, pp. 298–314, https://doi.org/10.36909/jer.11027.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] I. Abdedaim, E. Ouakdi, R. Louahdi, and A. Maati, “Effects of coating, holding force, stretching height, yield stress, and surface roughness on springback of steel in the V-stretch bending test,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 678–689, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2021-2116.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] L. Zhan, S. Tan, Y. Yang, M. Huang, W. Shen, and X. Zhao, “A research on the creep age forming of 2524 aluminum alloy: springback, mechanical properties, and microstructures,” Adv. Mech. Eng., vol. 6, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/707628.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] E. H. Ouakdi, R. Louahdi, D. Khirani, and L. Tabourot, “Evaluation of springback under the effect of holding force and die radius in a stretch bending test,” Mater. Des., vol. 35, pp. 106–112, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.003.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] J. Gattmah, F. Ozturk, and S. Orhan, “Numerical simulation of bending process for steel plate using finite element analysis,” Arab J Sci Eng, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 10285–10292, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04119-8.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] D. Sargeant, Z. Sarkar, R. Sharma, M. Knezevic, D. T. Fullwood, and M. P. Miles, “Effect of pre-strain on springback behavior after bending in AA 6016-T4: experiments and crystal plasticity modeling,” Int. J. Solids Struct., vol. 283, 2023, Art. no. 112485, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112485.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] M. Asmael, O. T. Fubara, and T. Nasir, “Prediction of springback behavior of vee bending process of AA5052 aluminum alloy sheets using machine learning,” Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2023, https://doi.org/10.59038/jjmie/170101.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] K. P. Li, W. P. Carden, and R. H. Wagoner, “Simulation of springback,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 103–122, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00083-2.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] M. L. Garcia-Romeu, J. Ciurana, and I. Ferrer, “Springback determination of sheet metals in an air bending process based on an experimental work,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 191, nos. 1–3, pp. 174–177, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.019.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] D. McCracken, D. Brown, McMurray, “Numerical simulation of the four roll bending process,” in Proc. of the 36th International MATADOR Conf., London, Springer, 2010, pp. 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-432-6_4.Suche in Google Scholar

[31] İ. Karaağaç, “The experimental investigation of springback in V-bending using the flexforming process,” Arab J Sci Eng, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1853–1864, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2329-6.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] M. Özdemir, H. Dilipak, and B. Bostan, “Numerically modeling spring back and spring go amounts and bending deformations of Cr-Mo alloyed sheet material,” Mater. Test., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1265–1272, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3139/120.111613.Suche in Google Scholar

[33] A. Muderrisoglu, M. Murata, M. A. Ahmetoglu, G. Kinzel, and T. Altan, “Bending, flanging, and hemming of aluminum sheet-an experimental study,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 59, nos. 1–2, pp. 10–17, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02281-9.Suche in Google Scholar

[34] N. Abdulrahman Alsaleh, “Micro-crack characteristics of aluminum 1050 sheets in bending at elevated temperatures,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 19–27, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9790/9622-0709061927.Suche in Google Scholar

[35] C. Ben Salem and W. Meslameni, “A numerical investigation on the springback in air V-bending of aluminum 1050 A,” Int. J. Res. Ind. Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 119–133, 2022. https://doi.org/10.22105/riej.2022.337535.1308.Suche in Google Scholar

[36] C. C. Kuo and B. T. Lin, “Optimization of springback for AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets in the L-bending process based on the Taguchi method,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 58, nos. 1–4, pp. 161–173, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3373-8.Suche in Google Scholar
Published Online: 2024-08-14
Published in Print: 2024-10-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. A comparison of recent optimization algorithms for build orientation problems in additive manufacturing
  3. Enhancing the performance of a additive manufactured battery holder using a coupled artificial neural network with a hybrid flood algorithm and water wave algorithm
  4. Numerical study on surface treatment of vibration-impact composite electric spark based on ABAQUS
  5. ANN modeling of tincal ore dehydration
  6. Capacitive voltage effect at a resistive sintering system container and its electrical model
  7. Tensile testing of S690QL1 HSS welded joint heterogeneous zones using small scale specimens and indentation methods
  8. Influence of thinner flaked Al powder with larger diameter on the distribution of B4C particles and tensile properties of B4C/Al composite
  9. Hydrogen susceptibility of Al 5083 under ultra-high strain rate ballistic loading
  10. Mechanical and metallurgical properties of a glass fiber-reinforced Al7075 hybrid composite produced by infiltration and after aging and abrasion
  11. Rotating bending fatigue behavior of high-pressure diecast AlSi10MgMn alloy based on T5 heat treatment parameters
  12. Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending
  13. Effect of Zr content on the microstructure, mechanical properties, electrochemical behavior, and biocompatibility of Mg–3Zn–xZr alloy using powder metallurgy
  14. Effect of concentration on PVA solutions and its usage in recycling carbon fiber/polyamide 12 prepregs
  15. Optimization of cutting parameters in manufacturing of polymeric materials for flexible two-phase thermal management systems
  16. Growth kinetics of Fe2B layer formed on the surface of borided AISI M2 high-speed steel
  17. Influence of strut angle and radius on the energy absorption and failure mechanisms in 3-strut, 4-strut and 6-strut lattice structures
  18. Microstructure and mechanical properties of similar and dissimilar resistance spot welded DC04 and HRP6222 (DD11) steels
https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2024-0146
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
aluminum 1050; finite element analysis; optimization; springback; v-bending

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. A comparison of recent optimization algorithms for build orientation problems in additive manufacturing
  3. Enhancing the performance of a additive manufactured battery holder using a coupled artificial neural network with a hybrid flood algorithm and water wave algorithm
  4. Numerical study on surface treatment of vibration-impact composite electric spark based on ABAQUS
  5. ANN modeling of tincal ore dehydration
  6. Capacitive voltage effect at a resistive sintering system container and its electrical model
  7. Tensile testing of S690QL1 HSS welded joint heterogeneous zones using small scale specimens and indentation methods
  8. Influence of thinner flaked Al powder with larger diameter on the distribution of B4C particles and tensile properties of B4C/Al composite
  9. Hydrogen susceptibility of Al 5083 under ultra-high strain rate ballistic loading
  10. Mechanical and metallurgical properties of a glass fiber-reinforced Al7075 hybrid composite produced by infiltration and after aging and abrasion
  11. Rotating bending fatigue behavior of high-pressure diecast AlSi10MgMn alloy based on T5 heat treatment parameters
  12. Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending
  13. Effect of Zr content on the microstructure, mechanical properties, electrochemical behavior, and biocompatibility of Mg–3Zn–xZr alloy using powder metallurgy
  14. Effect of concentration on PVA solutions and its usage in recycling carbon fiber/polyamide 12 prepregs
  15. Optimization of cutting parameters in manufacturing of polymeric materials for flexible two-phase thermal management systems
  16. Growth kinetics of Fe2B layer formed on the surface of borided AISI M2 high-speed steel
  17. Influence of strut angle and radius on the energy absorption and failure mechanisms in 3-strut, 4-strut and 6-strut lattice structures
  18. Microstructure and mechanical properties of similar and dissimilar resistance spot welded DC04 and HRP6222 (DD11) steels
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2026 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 1.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2024-0146/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen