Second language processing of English past tense morphology: The role of working memory

References

Abutalebi, Jubin & David Green. 2007. Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 20. 242–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Allan, Dave. 2001. Oxford quick placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Babcock, Laura, John C. Stowe, Christopher J. Maloof, Claudia Brovetto & Michael T. Ullman. 2012. The storage and composition of inflected forms in adult-learned second language: A study of the influence of length of residence, age of arrival, sex, and other factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15. 820–840. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728912000053.Suche in Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan D. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(11). 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01538-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan D. 2003. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36(3). 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9924(03)00019-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan D. & Graham J. Hitch. 1974. Working memory. In Gordon A. Bower (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 47–89. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1Suche in Google Scholar

Basnight-Brown, Dana M, Lang Chen, Shu Hua, Aleksandar Kostić & Laurie Beth Feldman. 2007. Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Sensitivity to form similarity varies with first language experience. Journal of Memory and Language 57. 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Bowden, Harriet W, Matthew P. Gelfand, Cristina Sanz & Michael T. Ullman. 2010. Verbal inflectional morphology in L1 and L2 Spanish: A frequency effects study examining storage versus composition. Language Learning 60. 44–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00551.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bowden, Harriet Wood, Karsten Steinhauer, Cristina Sanz & Michael T. Ullman. 2013 Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia 51. 2492–2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Brysbaert, Marc & Boris New. 2009. Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41. 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.977.Suche in Google Scholar

Çele, Filiz. 2010. Processing wh-dependencies in L2 English: The role of L1 and working memory capacity. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser. 2006. How native-like is non-native language processing?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10. 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald & Claudia Felser. 2017. Critical commentary: Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40(3). 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000250.Suche in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald, Claudia Felser, Kathleen Neubauer, Mikako Sato & Renita Silva. 2010. Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning 60. 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Clahsen, Harald, Loay Balkhair, John-Sebastian Schutter & Ian Cunnings. 2013. The time course of morphological processing in a second language. Second Language Research 29. 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312464970.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen-Mimran, Ravit, Jasmeen Adwan-Mansour & Shimon Sapir. 2013. The effect of morphological complexity on verbal working memory: Results from Arabic speaking children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42. 239–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9200-z.Suche in Google Scholar

Conway, Andrew R, Michael J. Kane, Michael F. Bunting, D. Zach Hambrick, Oliver Wilhelm & Randall W. Engle. 2005. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12. 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196772.Suche in Google Scholar

Coughlin, Caitlin E. & Annie Tremblay. 2013. Proficiency and working-memory-based explanations for non-native speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics 34. 615–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716411000890.Suche in Google Scholar

Coughlin, Caitlin E. & Annie Tremblay. 2015. Morphological decomposition in native and non–native French speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18. 524–542. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728914000200.Suche in Google Scholar

Crepaldi, Davide, Kathleen Rastle, Max Coltheart & Lyndsey Nickels. 2010. ’Fell’ primes ‘fall’, but does ‘bell’ prime ‘ball’? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language 63. 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Cunnings, Ian. 2017. Parsing and working memory in bilingual sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(4). 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728916000675.Suche in Google Scholar

Diependaele, Kevin, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Joanna Morris & Emmanuel Keuleers. 2011. Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 64. 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Feldman, Laurie Beth, Aleksandar Kostić, Dana M. Basnight-Brown, Dušica Filipović Đurđević & Matthew John Pastizzo. 2010. Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 13. 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728909990459.Suche in Google Scholar

Flege, James Emil, Grace H. Yeni-Komshian & Serena Liu. 1999. Age constraints on second language learning, Journal of Memory and Language 41. 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2638.Suche in Google Scholar

Fleischhauer, Elisabeth & Harald Clahsen. 2012. Generating inflected word forms in real time: Evaluating the role of age, frequency, and working memory. In Alia K. Biller, Esther Y. Chung & Amelia E. Kimball (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University conference on language development, 164–176. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Foote, Rebecca. 2011. Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English-Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics 32. 187–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716410000342.Suche in Google Scholar

Foote, Rebecca. 2017. The storage and processing of morphologically complex words in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39(4). 735–767. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263115000376.Suche in Google Scholar

Forster, Kenneth I., Chris Davis, Colin Schoknecht & Ronald G. Carter. 1987. Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 39. 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401785.Suche in Google Scholar

Fruchter, Joseph, Linnaea Stockall & Alec Marantz. 2013. MEG masked priming evidence for form–based decomposition of irregular verbs. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00798.Suche in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan & Iunkyu Lee. 2011. Working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and proficiency in a second language. In Monika S. Schmid & Wander Lowie (eds.), Modeling bilingualism: From structure to chaos. In honor of Kees de Bot, 59–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.43.06gasSuche in Google Scholar

Gor, Kira. 2015. Phonology and morphology in lexical processing. In John W. Schwieter (ed.), The cambridge handbook of bilingual processing, 173–199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107447257.007Suche in Google Scholar

Gor, Kira & Svetlana Cook. 2010. Non-native processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning 60. 88–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00552.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Gor, Kira & Scott Jackson. 2013. Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: A nesting doll effect, Language and Cognitive Processes 28. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.776696.Suche in Google Scholar

Gürel, Ayşe & Serkan Uygun. 2013. Representation of multimorphemic words in the mental lexicon: Implications for second language acquisition of morphology. In Baiz SarahGoldman Nora & Hawkes Rachel (eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual Boston University conference on language development, 122–133. Somerville: Cascadilla.Suche in Google Scholar

Heyer, Vera & Dana Kornishova. 2017. Semantic transparency affects morphological priming … eventually, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71(5). 1112–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1310915.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacob, Gunnar, Vera Heyer & João Veríssimo. 2017. Aiming at the same target: A masked priming study directly comparing derivation and inflection in the second language. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(6). 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916688333.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacob, Gunnar, Duygu Fatma Şafak, Orhan Demir & Bilal Kırkıcı. 2019. Preserved morphological processing in heritage speakers: A masked priming study on Turkish. Second Language Research 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318764535.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, Nan. 2012. Conducting reaction time research in second language studies. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203146255Suche in Google Scholar

Juffs, Alan. 2015. Working memory and sentence processing: A commentary. In Zhisheng Wen, Mailce Borges Mota & Arthur McNeill (eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing, 125–135: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783093595-011Suche in Google Scholar

Juffs, Alan & Michael Harrington. 2011. Aspects of working memory in L2 Learning. Language Teaching: Reviews and Studies 42. 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444810000509.Suche in Google Scholar

Kielar, Aneta, Marc F. Joanisse & Mary L. Hare. 2008. Priming English past tense verbs: rules or statistics?. Journal of Memory and Language 58. 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Kırkıcı, Bilal. 2005. Words and rules in L2 processing. An analysis of the dual-mechanism model. Ankara: Middle East Technical University dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Kırkıcı, Bilal. 2010. Distinct mechanisms in the processing of English past tense morphology: A view from L2 processing. In Martin Pütz & Laura Sicola (eds.), Inside the learner’s mind: Cognitive processing and second language acquisition, 67–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.13.07kirSuche in Google Scholar

Leeser, Michael J. 2007. Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning 57. 229–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00408.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Linck, Jared A. & Daniel J. Weiss. 2015. Working memory predicts second language classroom learning. Sage Open 5. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015607352.Suche in Google Scholar

Linck, Jared A., Peter Osthus, Joel T. Koeth & Michael F. Bunting 2014. Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21. 861–883. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, William D. 1999. Abstractness and combination: The morphemic lexicon. In Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering (eds.), Language processing, 101–119. Hove: Psychology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, William D. 2007. Morphological processes in language comprehension. In Gareth, Gaskell (ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 175–193. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0011Suche in Google Scholar

McDonald, Janet L. 2006. Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language 55. 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Meunier, Fanny & William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2004. Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes 19. 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000279.Suche in Google Scholar

Münte, Thomas F, Tessa Say, Harald Clahsen, Kolja Schiltz & Marta Kutas. 1999. Decomposition of morphologically complex words in English: Evidence from event–related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research 7. 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(98)00028-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Németh, Dezső, Rozália Ivády, Alessandro Guida, Márton Miháltz, Donald Peckham, Attila Krajcsi & Csaba Pléh. 2011. The effect of morphological complexity on short-term memory capacity. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 58. 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1556/aling.58.2011.1-2.5.Suche in Google Scholar

Neubauer, Kathleen. 2011. The processing of inflection and derivation in German as a second language. Essex: University of Essex dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Neubauer, Kathleen & Harald Clahsen. 2009. Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31. 403–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263109090354.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven & Michael T. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 6(11). 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01990-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Pliatsikas, Christos & Theodoros Marinis. 2013. Processing of regular and irregular past tense morphology in highly proficient second language learners of English: a self-paced reading study. Applied Psycholinguistics 34. 943–970. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716412000082.Suche in Google Scholar

Prasada, Sandeep, Steven Pinker & William Snyder. 1990. Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule generated. Presented at the 31st annual meeting of the psychonomic society meeting, New Orleans.Suche in Google Scholar

Rastle, Kathleen, Matt H. Davis, William D. Marslen-Wilson & Lorraine K. Tyler. 2000. Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time course study. Language and Cognitive Processes 15. 507–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689.Suche in Google Scholar

Rastle, Kathleen, Matthew H. Davis & Boris New. 2004. The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11. 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196742.Suche in Google Scholar

Rastle, Kathleen, Aureliu Lavric, Heike Elchlepp & Davide Crepaldi. 2015. Processing differences across regular and irregular inflections revealed through ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 41. 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039150.Suche in Google Scholar

Redick, Thomas S, James M. Broadway, Matt E. Meier, Princy S. Kuriakose, Nash Unsworth, Michael J. Kane & Randall W. Engle. 2012. Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 28. 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000123.Suche in Google Scholar

Sanz, Cristina, Hui-Ju Lin, Beatriz Lado, Catherine A. Stafford & Harriet W. Bowden. 2016. One size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory capacity in ab initio language development. Applied Linguistics 37(5). 669–692, https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu058.Suche in Google Scholar

Serafini, Ellen J. & Cristina Sanz. 2016. Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38(4). 607–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000327.Suche in Google Scholar

Sereno, Joan A. & Allard Jongman. 1997. Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory & Cognition 25(4). 425–437. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03201119.Suche in Google Scholar

Service, Elisabet & Sini Maury. 2015. Differential recall of derived and inflected word forms in working memory: Examining the role of morphological information in simple and complex working memory tasks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01064.Suche in Google Scholar

Service, Elisabet & Anna-Mari Tujulin. 2002. Recall of morphologically complex forms is affected by memory task but not dyslexia. Brain and Language 81. 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2505.Suche in Google Scholar

Silva, Renita & Harald Clahsen. 2008. Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11. 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728908003404.Suche in Google Scholar

Smolka, Eva, Pienie Zwitserlood & Frank Rösler. 2007. Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language 57. 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Stanners, Robert F, James J. Neiser, William P. Hernon & Roger Hall. 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18. 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90219-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Tabachnick, Barbara G. & Linda S. Fidell. 2013. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.Suche in Google Scholar

Ullman, Michael T. 2005. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Cristina Sanz (ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice, 141–178. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ullman, Michael T. 2016. The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language learning, knowledge, and use. In Gregory Hickok & Steven L. Small (eds.), Neurobiology of language, 953–968, Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00076-6Suche in Google Scholar

Unsworth, Nash, Richard P. Heitz, Josef C. Schrock & Randall W. Engle. 2005. An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods 37. 498–505. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192720.Suche in Google Scholar

Uygun, Serkan & Ayşe Gürel. 2016. Processing morphology in L2 Turkish: The effects of morphological richness in the L1. In Ayşe Gürel (ed.), Second language acquisition of Turkish, 251–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.59.10uygSuche in Google Scholar

Wen, Zhisheng. 2015. Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In Zhisheng Wen, Mailce Borges Mota & Arthur McNeill (eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing, 41–63. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783093595-007Suche in Google Scholar

Wen, Zhisheng. 2019. Working memory as language aptitude: The phonological/executive model. In Zhisheng Edward Wen, Peter Skehan, Adriana Biedroń, Shaofeng Li & Richard L. Sparks (eds.), Language aptitude: Advancing theory, testing, research and practice, 276–338. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315122021-10Suche in Google Scholar

Wen, Zhisheng & Shaofeng Li. 2019. Working memory in L2 learning and processing. In John W. Schwieter & Alessandro Benati. (eds.), The cambridge handbook of language learning, 365–389. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Wen, Zhisheng & Peter Skehan. 2011. A new perspective on foreign language aptitude research: Building and supporting a case for “working memory as language aptitude”. Ilha do Desterro 60. 15–43. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2011n60p015.Suche in Google Scholar

White, Lydia. 2003. Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6. 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728903001081.Suche in Google Scholar