Recasts versus clarification requests: The relevance of linguistic target, proficiency, and communicative ability

References

Ammar, Ahlem. 2008. Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research 12(2). 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086287.Search in Google Scholar

Ammar, Ahlem & Nina Spada. 2006. One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(4). 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263106060268.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Roger W. & Yasuhiro Shirai. 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(02). 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100012845.Search in Google Scholar

Ayoun, Dalila. 2001. The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passe compose and the imparfait. The Modern Language Journal 85(2). 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00106.Search in Google Scholar

Ayoun, Dalila. 2004. The effectiveness of written recasts in the second language acquisition of aspectual distinctions in French: A follow-up study. Modern Language Journal 88. 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00217.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2000. Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning and use. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Bartning, Inge & Suzanne Schlyter. 2004. Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French Language Studies 14. 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269504001802.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Dan. 2016. The type of linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research 20(4). 436–458.10.1177/1362168814563200Search in Google Scholar

Bygate, Martin. 1999. Quality of language and purpose of task. Language Teaching Research 3(3). 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889900300302.Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, Helen, Seon K. Jeon, David MacGregor, & Alison Mackey. 2006. Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2). 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060104.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Susanne. 2001. Input and evidence. The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.25Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Susanne, Merrill Swain, & Yves Roberge. 1992. The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalizations. Applied Psycholinguistics 13(02). 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005555.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the bahavioral sciences, 2nd edn. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert. 2005. What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning 55(S1). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x.Search in Google Scholar

Dietrich, Robert, Wolfgang Klein, & Colette Noyau. 1995. The acquisition of temporality in a second language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.7Search in Google Scholar

Doski, Pawan Muhajir & Filiz Cele. 2018. The effect of oral corrective feedback on article errors in L3 English: Prompts vs. recasts. English Language Teaching 11(8). 143. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n8p143.Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine. 2001. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Peter Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 206–257. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.010Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine & Elizabeth Varela. 1998. Communicative focus on form. In Catherine Doughty & Jessica Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine & Jessica Williams. 1998. Focus on form in classroom: Second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Egi, Takako. 2007. Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(4). 511–537. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070416.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. 2005. At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and Implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(2). 305–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2007. The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In Alison Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, 339–360. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2012. Second language research and language pedagogy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118271643Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Helen Basturkmen, & Shawn Loewen. 2001. Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning 51(2). 281–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00156.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Shawn Loewen, & Rosemary Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(2). 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod & Younghee Sheen. 2006. Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(4). 575–600.https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310606027X.Search in Google Scholar

Field, Andy P. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd edn. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Pauline & Amy Snyder Ohta. 2005. Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics 26(3). 402–430. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami014.Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan. 2003. Input and interaction. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, 224–255. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756492.ch9Search in Google Scholar

Gass, Susan, Alison Mackey, & Lauren Ross-Feldman. 2011. Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning 61. 189–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00646.x.Search in Google Scholar

Goldschneider, Jennifer M. & Robert, DeKeyser. 2005. Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 55(S1). 27–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00295.x.Search in Google Scholar

Goo, Jaemyung. 2012. Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34(03). 445–474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000149.Search in Google Scholar

Goo, Jaemyung & Alison Mackey. 2013. The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35(1). 127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000708.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Birgit. 1989. Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics 10(3). 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.3.331.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Birgit. 1993. Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15(02). 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011980.Search in Google Scholar

Havranek, Gertrude. 2002. When is corrective feedback most likely to succeed? International Journal of Educational Research 37. 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00004-1.Search in Google Scholar

Hulstijn, Jan H. 2011. Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: An agenda for research and suggestions for second language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly 8. 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565844.Search in Google Scholar

Ishida, Midori. 2004. Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i-(ru) by Learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning 54(2). 311–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00257.x.Search in Google Scholar

Iwashita, Noriko. 2003. Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1). 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000019.Search in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1991. Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41(1–3). 9–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90031-X.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Marsha A. 1987. Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign language learners of French. In Bill VanPatten, Trisha Dvorak, & James F. Lee (eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective, 52–60. Cambridge, New York: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Lardiere, Donna. 1998. Case and tense in the ‘‘fossilized’’ steady-state. Second Language Research 14. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898674105303.Search in Google Scholar

Leeman, Jennifer. 2003. Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25(1). 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000020.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng. 2010. The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2). 309–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng. 2014. The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of the linguistic target. Language Teaching Research 18. 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813510384.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng, Rod Ellis, & Yan Zhu. 2016. Task-based versus task-supported language instruction: An experimental study. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36. 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000069.Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, Shawn & Toshiyo Nabei. 2007. Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In Alison Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, Shawn & Jenefer Philp. 2006. Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal 90(4). 536–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, 413–468. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. 2007. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. Shunji Inagaki, & Lourdes Ortega. 1998. The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal 82(3). 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01213.x.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael H. & Peter Robinson. 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In Catherine Doughty & Jessica Williams (eds.), Focus on form in classroom: Second language acquisition, 15–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 1998. Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20(1). 51–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226319800103X.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 2004. Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(3). 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027263104263021.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Hirohide Mori. 2006. Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in secondn language acquisition 28(2). 269–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060128.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Jesus Izquierdo. 2009. Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning 59(2). 453–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.x.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Leila Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19(1). 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Leila Ranta. 2013. Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35. 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200071X.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy & Kazuya Saito. 2010. Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2). 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy, Kazuya Saito, & Masatoshi Sato. 2013. Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching 46. 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison. 2006. Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics 27(3). 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami051.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison, Gass Gass, & Kim McDonough. 2000. How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(04). 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004010.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison & Jaemyung Goo. 2007. Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In: Alison Mackey (ed.),Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, Alison & Jenefer Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82(3). 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x.Search in Google Scholar

McDonough, Kim. 2006. Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28(02). 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060098.Search in Google Scholar

McDonough, Kim. 2007. Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In Alison Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition, 323–338. Oxford: OUP.Search in Google Scholar

McDonough, Kim & Alison Mackey. 2006. Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning 56(4). 693–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x.Search in Google Scholar

McManus, Kevin & Emma Marsden. 2017. L1 explicit instruction can improve L2 online and offline performance. Studies in second langauge acquisition 39(3). 459–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311600022X.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Gregory A. & Jean P. Chapman. 2001. Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 110(1). 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.110.1.40.Search in Google Scholar

Muranoi, Hitoshi. 2000. Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning 50(4). 617–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00142.Search in Google Scholar

Myles, Florence, Rosamund Mitchell, & Jenet Hooper. 1999. Interrogative chunks in French L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(01). 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199001023.Search in Google Scholar

Nakatsukasa, Kimi. 2016. Efficacy of recasts and gestures on the acquisition of locative prepositions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38(4). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000467.Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein. 2010. The occurrence and effectiveness of spontaneous focus on form in adult ESL classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review 66. 907–933. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.6.907.Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein. 2016. Anniversary article: Interactional feedback in econd language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research, Language Teaching Research 20(4). 535–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816644940.Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein. 2017. The effectiveness of extensive versus intensive recasts for learning L2 grammar. The Modern Language Journal 101(2). 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12387.Search in Google Scholar

Nassaji, Hossein & Eva Kartchava. 2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315621432Search in Google Scholar

Norris, John. 2015. Statistical significance testing in second language research: Basic problems and suggestions for reform. Language Learning 65(S1). 97–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12114.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. & Lourdes Ortega. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3). 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136.Search in Google Scholar

Oliver, Rhonda. 1995. Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 17(4). 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014418.Search in Google Scholar

Philp, Jenefer. 2003. Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Non-native speaker’s noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in second language acquisition 25(1). 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000044.Search in Google Scholar

Pica, Teresa. 1983. Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(01). 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100000309.Search in Google Scholar

Révész, Andrea. 2009. Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 31(3). 437–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090366.Search in Google Scholar

Révész, Andrea. 2012. Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning 62(1). 93–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Jane & Nina Spada. 2006. The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. A meta-analysis of the research. In John M. Norris & Lourdes Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching, 133–164. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.13.09valSearch in Google Scholar

Saito, Kazuya. 2013. The acquisitional value of recasts in instructed language speech learning: Teaching the perception and production of English /ɹ/ to adult Japanese learners. Language Learning 63(3). 499–529.10.1111/lang.12015Search in Google Scholar

Sato, Masatoshi & Shawn Loewen. 2018. Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning 68(2). 507–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12283.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11(2). 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Richard. 2001. Attention. In Peter Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee. 2004. Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research 8(3). 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr146oa.Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee. 2006. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research 10(4). 361–392. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr203oa.Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee. 2008. Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning 58(4). 835–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x.Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Younghee & Rod Ellis. 2011. Corrective feedback in language teaching. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol. 2, 593–610. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203836507.ch36Search in Google Scholar

Skehan, Peter. 1998. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. 2003. Near-nativeness. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, 130–151. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756492.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Andrew & Gergana Popova. 2015. Periphrasis and inflection. In Mathew Baerman (ed.), The Oxford handbook of inflection, 197–230. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591428.013.9Search in Google Scholar

Stoll, Sabine. 2015. Inflectional morphology in language acquisition. In Mathew Baerman (ed.), The Oxford handbook of inflection, 351–374. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591428.013.15Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 2008. Aspects of attention in language. In Peter Robinson and Nick C. Ellis (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 27–38. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501743726Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Yingli & Roy Lyster. 2010. Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32(2). 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990519.Search in Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Yucel. 2012. The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning 62. 1134–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00726.x.Search in Google Scholar