Impact Factor: 0.9

Journal

Text & Talk

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies

Edited by: Srikant Sarangi

Language: English

First published: January 1, 1981

Publication Frequency: 6 issues per year

View latest issue

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

About this journal

Objective
Text & Talk (founded as TEXT in 1981) is an internationally recognized forum for interdisciplinary research in language, discourse, and communication studies, focusing, among other things, on the situational and historical nature of text/talk production; the cognitive and sociocultural processes of language practice/action; and participant-based structures of meaning negotiation and multimodal alignment. Text & Talk encourages critical debates on these and other relevant issues, spanning not only the theoretical and methodological dimensions of discourse but also their practical and socially relevant outcomes.

Topics

discourse analysis
applied linguistics
pragmatics
sociolinguistics
corpus linguistics
multimodality
genre analysis
communication
professional practice

Article formats
Full Length Articles, Short Articles, Systematic Literature Reviews, Review Articles, Forum Discussions, Research Notes

Your Benefits

Your benefits:

Access to high quality, original research outputs
Interdisciplinary approaches to language, communication and discourse studies
Methodological/analytical pluralism in engagement with empirical data
Current theoretical advancements
Special issues on highly seminal topics
Different article formats inclusive of systematic literature reviews, review articles, research notes and forum discussions
Internationally acclaimed scholars serving on editorial boards

History

Text & Talk was founded in 1981 under the original title TEXT. The journal title was changed to TEXT & TALK in 2006 and Srikant Sarangi has been Editor since 1998.

Other publications in the field
Journals:

Book series:

Handbooks of Applied Linguistics [HAL]

Trends in Applied Linguistics [TAL]

Open Access
Cutting emissions, halting biodiversity loss: climate change solutions in the language of UK politicians and UK climate activists, 2018–2020

June 23, 2025

John S. G. Currie

Download PDF

Activists and politicians are important groups in the context of climate change discourse but have thus far rarely been studied in terms of their discursive constructions of climate change solutions, especially via big data methods. This paper uses a corpus-assisted discourse studies approach to analyse semantic transitivity patterns in how climate change mitigation and adaptation are discussed in two corpora of UK climate activist and parliamentary discourse, 2018–2020. A novel aspect of the methodology involves locating discursive constructions of climate change mitigation and adaptation in large datasets via verbs which semantically address climate change causes and effects. The findings reveal a degree of similarity between the two groups, occasionally suggesting that their language is similar, particularly in 2019 where, for example, discussions of fossil fuel increase from a comparatively low level in the parliamentary corpus but decrease as a percentage share from a comparatively high level in the activist corpus. However, the findings also confirm existing research that climate change activists reject hegemonic discourses to which politicians tend to adhere, such as there being a greater emphasis on economic costs and opportunities in the parliamentary corpus. Both the methodology and the findings pose questions for future research.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Lexico-syntactic features of science and science popularization texts: an information-theoretic view

June 18, 2025

Siwen Guo, Maocheng Liang

Download PDF

Science and science popularization texts disseminating partly overlapped scientific knowledge show distinct writing strategies. We examine their differences concerning aspects of lexis, word classes, and dependency relations by Kullback-Leibler divergence, taking “60-Second Science” texts and source research article abstracts as an illustration. The findings reveal that “60-Second Science” is more interactive in terms of quotation marks, question marks, “they”, and “you” while abstracts are more informative with hyphens linking words from different categories. Moreover, word classes show that pronouns and adverbs are typical in “60-Second Science”. However, abstracts utilize nouns and adjectives significantly more. Dependency relations demonstrate that nominal subjects and adverbial modifiers are prominent in “60-Second Science” compared to adjectival and prepositional modifiers in abstracts. The study presents a clear comparison of linguistic features between science and science popularization texts that can be applied in scientific English writing and teaching in connection with different scientific communicative events and further promote the dissemination of scientific knowledge.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Representation of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in media opinion pieces

April 2, 2025

Samuel Reid

Download PDF

The Fukushima nuclear power plant meltdown is the second worst accident in the history of nuclear power. As nuclear power is a controversial policy option, interpreting the significance of the disaster is important in the struggle over the legitimacy of nuclear power. This article compares the representation of Fukushima between a corpus of five pro-nuclear and five anti-nuclear media opinion pieces published in English-language online newspapers. It uses systemic functional linguistics to examine the verbal process types and clausal positioning of Fukushima, focusing on themes in the data and how these representations construct competing arguments about the disaster. In pro-nuclear articles Fukushima has more frequent Relational and Mental process types and has more foregrounded clausal positioning, which reflects the need to emphasise alternative interpretations to the narrative of Fukushima as an unacceptable disaster. In anti-nuclear articles there are more frequent Material processes and backgrounded clausal positioning, which reflects a focus on the physical damage of the disaster and an assumption that Fukushima is evidence of the fallibility of nuclear power. Discursive differences over three specific aspects are identified – the lesson to be taken from Fukushima, the assessment of damage caused, and the performance of the nuclear plant.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

The functions of grammaticalized complement-taking-predicate clauses in interrogatives: a typology

March 28, 2025

Jiqiang Lu, Kristin Davidse

Download PDF

Grammaticalized complement-taking-predicate (CTP) clauses like I think have been much studied in declaratives but not in interrogatives. We propose a typology of the grammatical functions that these CTP-clauses can convey, i.e., polarity bias, polarity reversal, modal orientation and opinion marker, and we relate these to the different dialogic functions that interrogatives can serve , i.e., Question, Query and Challenge. We apply the proposed analysis to samples of are you sure , do you think and is there a chance from the British Spoken sub-corpus of Wordbanks Online and discuss how their source semantics influences the grammatical and dialogic functions they specialize for: are you sure reverses polarity, typically in Queries; do you think is used mainly as opinion marker in Questions; and is there a chance marks modal orientation in Questions.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Explaining the misconduct: Meaning-making of legitimation strategies in corporate apologies on Weibo

March 26, 2025

Yu Che, Xinxin Jiang

Download PDF

Using a selected corpus of 20 corporate apology texts and 11,766 user comments on Sina Weibo, a Twitter-like Chinese social media, this study first evaluates the effectiveness of legitimation strategies underpinning these apologies offered by examining their distribution patterns based on frequency, percentage of use, and user reactions. It then employs textual analysis to discuss several apology cases that demonstrate both successful and unsuccessful applications of different legitimation strategies, revealing how cultural values influence the meaning-making process in the Chinese context and affect the effectiveness of corporate apologies. The findings suggest that appeals to role models, analogies, and the combined use of goal- and explanation-based strategies can justify corporate misconduct and evoke positive feedback. This meaning-making process shows how corporations leverage lexical, rhetorical, and cultural power to legitimize their misconduct, while audiences exercise agency in evaluating these apologies through specific socio-cultural norms.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Ill, vulnerable and kind: a corpus-based study of the discourse representation of older adults on Weibo

February 28, 2025

Shuling Zhang, Kai Bao

Download PDF

This article offers an in-depth analysis of the evolving representations of older adults on Weibo, a leading Chinese social media platform, using a self-compiled corpus of nearly 7 million tokens from posts spanning January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022. We utilize a corpus analysis tool to identify four-grams and perform concordance analysis to determine thematic categories and track their frequency changes over time. The findings reveal significant shifts in the portrayal of older adults, highlighting not only deteriorations in health but also perceived declines in cognitive abilities, moral standing, and societal roles. This evolved depiction paints older adults as increasingly isolated, outdated, and vulnerable, suggesting a nuanced form of marginalization compared to pre-pandemic portrayals. This study contributes to the existing literature by delineating the complex dynamics of older adult representation on Chinese social media against the backdrop of a rapidly aging population.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Shifting from a ‘just’ to a ‘fair’ transition in environmental discourse: a case of old wine in a new bottle?

February 18, 2025

Pietro Manzella

Download PDF

This paper investigates the language used in certain institutional documents discussing the ‘just’ and ‘fair’ transitions, aiming to determine whether this lexical shift is merely nominal or reflects differences in the construction of these concepts. Specifically, two non-binding documents are considered: the International Labour Organization (ILO) Guidelines (2015) and the European Union (EU) Council Recommendation (2022). Using the Appraisal Framework, particularly the Judgement subsystem, the paper explores how these texts evaluate human behaviour and the ethical dimensions related to environmental transitions, addressing the following questions: How is this shift discursively framed in these documents? What are the potential implications of this terminological change in terms of stance-taking and reader reception regarding environmental issues? The findings reveal that while both the ILO Guidelines and the EU Recommendation emphasise the urgency of transitioning to greener economies, the ILO Guidelines advocate for a participatory ‘just’ transition, whereas the EU Recommendation promotes a more top-down ‘fair’ transition. This distinction aligns with Rawls’ theory of justice, with the ‘just’ transition reflecting a more inclusive approach.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Effects of writing topic, first language background, and second language proficiency on ‘V that’ clauses in argumentative writing

February 18, 2025

Yingying Liu, Jingyuan Zhuang

Download PDF

With the growing use of corpora in second language (L2) research, examining the role of writing topics alongside first language (L1) background and L2 proficiency in shaping L2 usage has become increasingly important. This study contributes to this line of inquiry by using a learner corpus of 1,198 argumentative essays to explore how writing topics, in tandem with L1 background and L2 proficiency, influence the use of ‘V that’ clauses (e.g., I think that it is important… ) among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writers. The findings reveal significant effects of writing topic on the diversity and semantic distribution of ‘V that’, variations across L1 backgrounds, a decrease in frequency with higher L2 proficiency, and interaction effects among the three factors in all aspects of ‘V that’ usage. These findings highlight the importance of considering topic effects alongside L1 background and L2 proficiency in corpus-based L2 research, suggesting both theoretical and methodological implications.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Narrative navigation in legal persuasion: a rhetorical analysis of lawyers’ affidavits and skeleton arguments for appellate relief in criminal cases in Malawi

February 14, 2025

Wellman Kondowe, Dorothy nyaKaunda Kamanga

Download PDF

Narrative navigation and lawyers’ use of linguistic persuasion in affidavits and skeleton arguments for appellant relief in criminal cases remains one of the under-researched areas in the field of language and law. This is a phase at which lawyers have the opportunity to influence the judicial decision-making process through their ability to persuade the appellate judge to believe their version of the case to be the true version. The argument chosen by the lawyer and the manner of telling it are inseparable. By utilising data from ten appellate level criminal cases from the High Court of Malawi, this study investigates the narrative structure of lawyers’ affidavits and skeleton arguments using Aristotle’s rhetorical analysis framework. Our findings reveal that the appeal to logos is simply a templatic genre structure that lawyers are meant to follow. However, lawyers’ appeals to ethos and pathos reveal excessive redundancy and low deployment of important linguistic resources that can help them be appropriately persuasive, which can be acceptable to the wider discourse community.
Open Access
Positive and negative risk in adventure tourism discourse: adrenaline hunting in “arctic Lapland”

February 3, 2025

Annelie Ädel, Jan-Ola Östman

Download PDF

‘Risk’ is typically thought of as something negative, and as something that should be avoided at all cost: risk characteristically has to do with the probability of an unwanted event occurring. However, risk may also be seen as something positive, even energizing, as in the context of financial markets or gambling. Voluntary risk taking has typically been approached through the concepts ‘action’ and ‘edgework’. In this study, both negative and positive aspects of risk are explored in the context of adventure tourism. The focus is on how risk is discursively constructed in adventure tourism websites for Sápmi, centring on destinations in Sweden (Kiruna), Finland (Rovaniemi) and Norway (Tromsø). Our primary material from the booking platform Adrenaline Hunter amounts to 12,000 words. The findings show an ambivalence between negative and positive aspects of risk, but in a scalar sense, ranging from “soft” to “hard” types, with a negotiable awareness of how relative what counts as “extreme” may be. The theoretical suggestion is that positive aspects of risk need to be taken seriously for a fuller understanding of the very concept of ‘risk’ and of the workings of risk discourse.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Emotion displays in “moments of conflict” in parent-child interaction

January 31, 2025

Younhee Kim, Andrew P. Carlin

Download PDF

“Moments of conflict” occur regularly in daily routines within parent-child interaction. Video data of a mother attempting to ready her son for kindergarten make perspicuous the subtleties of emotion displays in negotiations for future courses of action, e.g., parental directive/non-compliance. By focusing on the interactional dynamics of emotion display in conflictual action negotiation sequences, this conversation analytic study highlights the significant role of emotion display in compliance negotiation and managing a parent-child relationship. The findings demonstrate how emotion display may constitute a social action to which co-participants in interaction respond within the progressivity of sequences of action, and how both parent and child orient to each other’s displays of emotion. Further, that emotion displays may be used as resources for negotiating compliance. Emotion display also allows parents to propose affiliation on a relational level while remaining firm on family rules. Our study contributes to the growing body of research on directive/response sequences in parent-child interaction, and more broadly to conversation analytic research on affect and emotion by illustrating the nexus between emotion display and progressivity.
Requires Authentication Unlicensed
Licensed

Comparing the negotiation of attitudes in audience-sensitive art exhibition labels: how they engage visitors of different age groups

January 17, 2025

Siyu Yao, Yumin Chen

Download PDF

This article examines how audience-sensitive art exhibition labels engage visitors of different age groups – children and adults – from an appraisal perspective. The potential of evaluative language and emotionally charged expressions in enhancing visitor engagement is increasingly recognized by museum professionals, while it has received limited in-depth exploration in the research literature. A corpus of 56 audience-sensitive labels from an exhibition at the Art Gallery of New South Wales in Australia was compiled for a comparative analysis of how they negotiate affect, judgement, and appreciation meanings. The findings reveal that both sets of labels frequently employ positive and inscribed appreciations to evaluate the qualities of the artworks. However, there are notable differentiations regarding the realizations of attitude types, subtypes, polarity, mode, appraisers, and the appraised triggers/targets. This article contributes to our understanding about the use of evaluative language in art exhibition labels for children and adults, offering insights into audience-sensitive label writing practice in the art museum context.

Special Issue: Gunther Kress – Explorer of the Semiotic Landscape; Guest Editors: Jeff Bezemer and Theo van Leeuwen

Special Issue: Stancetaking in Motion: Grammar and Stance Activities in East and Southeast Asian Languages; Guest Editor: Shoichi Iwasaki

Special Issue: Environmental issues in the Anthropocene: ecolinguistic perspectives across media and genres; Guest Editors: Douglas Mark Ponton and Małgorzata Sokół

Special Issue: Corpus Linguistics across the Generations: In Memory of Geoffrey Leech; Guest Editors: Tony McEnery and Gavin Brookes

Special Issue: The Moral Character of Emotion Work in Adult-Child Interactions; Guest editors: Asta Cekaite and Ann-Carita Evaldsson

Special Issue: The dynamics of textual trajectories in professional and workplace practice, Guest editors: Theresa Lillis and Janet Maybin

Special Issue: Represented talk across activities and languages, Guest Editors: Matthew T. Prior and Gabriele Kasper

Special Issue: Multimodality, meaning-making, and the issue of “text”

In honor of Michael Halliday

Stance, Affect, and Intersubjectivity in Interaction: Sequential and Dialogic Perspectives

In honour of John Gumperz

to be implemented...

Issue 0

Issue 45

Issue 44

Issue 43

Issue 42

Issue 41

Issue 40

Issue 39

Issue 38

Issue 37

Issue 36

Issue 35

Issue 34

Issue 33

Issue 32

Issue 31

Issue 30

Issue 29

Issue 28

Issue 27

Issue 26

Issue 25

Issue 24

Issue 23

Issue 22

Issue 21

Issue 20

Issue 19

Issue 18

Issue 17

Issue 16

Issue 15

Issue 14

Issue 13

Issue 12

Issue 11

Issue 10

Issue 9

Issue 8

Issue 7

Issue 6

Issue 5

Issue 4

Issue 3

Issue 2

Issue 1

Text & Talk publishes special and thematic issues focussed on important and emerging topics in the field of study. The journal has established a rigorous process to ensure that any special issue manuscripts follow the same high-quality standards and peer review processes as regular manuscripts. For further information on the journal’s peer review policy please see the "Instructions for Authors".

Recent Special Issues

Volume 44 | Issue 4 Special Issue: Gunther Kress – Explorer of the Semiotic Landscape; Guest Editors: Jeff Bezemer and Theo van Leeuwen

Journal Impact Factor	0.9	2024, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2025)
5-year Journal Impact Factor	1.0	2024, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2025)
Journal Citation Indicator	0.58	2024, Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate, 2025)
CiteScore	2.4	2024, Scopus (Elsevier B.V., 2025)
SCImago Journal Rank	0.433	2024, SJR (Scimago Lab, 2025; Data Source: Scopus)
Source Normalized Impact per Paper	0.941	2024, CWTS Journal Indicators (CWTS B.V., 2025; Data Source: Scopus)

More information about journal rankings

Submission

High quality manuscript processing through ScholarOne Manuscripts®
Manuscripts are submitted online: go to http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/text and you will be guided through the process

As per De Gruyter policy, no author list changes are permitted after acceptance of an article. The De Gruyter production team is instructed to enforce this policy during the production/proofing process.

Your benefits of publishing with us

Double-blind peer-review aimed at improving the quality of your paper
Online publication ahead-of-print
Accepted papers are published online first as DOI-citable, articles are forward-linked for the quickest possible visibility to the scientific community
Optional open access publication
Free publication of color figures both in online and print editions and no page charges
Every article easily discoverable because of SEO and comprehensive abstracting and indexing services
Secure archiving by De Gruyter and the independent archiving service Portico

Please note

Before submitting your article, please have a look at our Instructions for Authors
Manuscripts must be written in clear and concise English
A Full-Length Research Article should normally be between 6,000 and 8,000 words when submitted. Authors should report the total word count (including references, tables, footnotes, and appendices, but excluding supplementary material) at the end of the manuscript. You are required to stay within the word limit (8000 words all inclusive). Exceptions to the word limit can be made when presenting non-English data (you are advised to include original data extracts in an appendix).
The De Gruyter Mouton journal style sheet contains formatting details for your manuscript
A Publication Ethics Statement and a signed copyright agreement are required before publication
Our repository policy allows you to distribute 30 PDF copies of your published article to colleagues (the PDF has to include the information that it is an author's copy). Please also feel free to distribute the link to the online abstract
If you have any general questions please visit our FAQ page for journal authors

We look forward to receiving your manuscript!

Hybrid Open Access

Authors have the option to publish their article under an open access license. The standard article processing charge for a hybrid open access article is 2,000 Euro (plus VAT if applicable). Please note that corresponding authors from institutions with which we have a transformative agreement, can publish open access without paying the fee. More information on the eligible institutions and articles can be found here.

Editor-in-Chief

Srikant Sarangi (Aalborg University, Denmark & Cardiff University, UK)

Editorial Associate

Jean Pietrowicz
textandtalk@degruyter.com

Specialist Board

Paul Baker (Lancaster University, UK)
Malcolm Coulthard (University of Birmingham, UK)
Anna De Fina (Georgetown University, USA)
Anita Fetzer (University of Augsburg, Germany)
Nigel Harwood (The University of Sheffield, UK)
Jan-Ola Östman (University of Helsinki, Finland)

Honorary Board

John Swales (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA)

Advisory Board

Elisabetta Adami (University of Leeds)
Jannis Androutsopoulos (University of Hamburg, Germany)
Karin Aronsson (Stockholm University, Sweden)
Michael Bamberg (Clark University, USA)
John A. Bateman (University of Bremen, Germany)
Monika Bednarek (The University of Sydney, Australia)
Marina Bondi (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy)
Ruth Breeze (University of Navarra, Spain)
Richard Buttny (Syracuse University, USA)
Marta Dynel (University of Łódź, Poland)
Susan Ehrlich (York University, Toronto, Canada)
Stefan Th. Gries (University of California, Santa Barbara, USA)
Bethany Gray (Iowa State University, USA)
Helmut Gruber (Vienna University, Austria)
Pentti Haddington (University of Oulu, Finland)
Kira Hall (University of Colorado, Boulder, USA)
Richard Heyman (University of Calgary, Canada)
Guangwei Hu (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR China)
Susan Hunston (University of Birmingham, UK)
Sylvia Jaworska (University of Reading, UK)
Daniel Kadar (Dalian University of Foreign Languages, China)
Helen Kelly-Holmes (University of Limerick, Ireland)
Inger Lassen (Aalborg University, Denmark)
Michelle M. Lazar (National University of Singapore, Singapore)
Xiaoting Li (University of Alberta, Canada)
David Machin (Shanghai International Studies University, China)
Paul Kei Matsuda (Arizona State University, USA)
Gerlinde Mautner (Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria)
Paul McIlvenny (Aalborg University, Denmark)
Lorenza Mondada (University of Basel, Switzerland)
Cornelia Müller (European University Viadrina, Frankfurt, Germany)
Neal R. Norrick (Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany)
Sigrid Norris (Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand)
Gerard O’Grady (Cardiff University, UK)
Anne O'Keeffe (Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick, Ireland)
Louise Ravelli (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)
Martin Reisigl (University of Vienna, Austria)
John E. Richardson (University of Liverpool, UK)
Kay Richardson (University of Liverpool, UK)
Betty Samraj (San Diego State University, USA)
Philip Seargeant (The Open University, UK)
Shi-xu (Hangzhou Normal University, China)
Melisa Stevanovic (Tampere University, Finland)
Maite Taboada (Simon Fraser University, Canada)
Deborah Tannen (Georgetown University, Washington, USA)
Hongyin Tao (University of California, Los Angeles, USA)
Crispin Thurlow (University of Bern, Switzerland)
Karen Tracy (University of Colorado, Boulder, USA)
Theo van Leeuwen (University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark)
Ann Weatherall (University of Bedfordshire, UK)

Text & Talk is covered by the following services:

Baidu Scholar
BLL Bibliographie Linguistischer Literatur
CIOS - ComAbstracts
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Ingenta Connect
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (ProQuest)
J-Gate
Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition
JournalGuide
Linguistic Bibliography
Linguistics Abstracts Online
MLA International Bibliography
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
OLC Linguistik
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
ScienceON (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
Scilit
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Arts & Humanities Citation Index
Web of Science - Current Contents/Arts & Humanities
Web of Science - Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences
Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index
WorldCat (OCLC)
X-MOL
Yewno Discover

Online Submission of Manuscripts

Journal information

Additional information

eISSN:

1860-7349

ISSN:

1860-7330

Language:

English

Publisher:

De Gruyter Mouton

Additional information

First published:

January 1, 1981

Publication Frequency:

6 issues per year

eISSN: 1860-7349

ISSN: 1860-7330

Audience(s) for this journal

Researchers in the interdisciplinary field of language, communication and discourse analysis

Safety & product resources

Manufacturer information:
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Genthiner Straße 13
10785 Berlin
productsafety@degruyterbrill.com

Text & Talk

Overview

About this journal

Your Benefits

History

Ahead of Publication / Just Accepted

Issues

Special issues

Ranking

Submit

Editorial

Abstracting and Indexing

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Topics

Topics

External Links

Bibliographic data