Shifting from a ‘just’ to a ‘fair’ transition in environmental discourse: a case of old wine in a new bottle?
-
Pietro Manzella
Pietro Manzella is a Researcher in English Language, Linguistics and Translation at the Department of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Social Studies (DILL), University of Udine (Italy). His research focuses on legal and sustainability discourse, the use of language at the workplace and multilingualism. He has published in the areas of Translation Studies (TS) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).
Abstract
This paper investigates the language used in certain institutional documents discussing the ‘just’ and ‘fair’ transitions, aiming to determine whether this lexical shift is merely nominal or reflects differences in the construction of these concepts. Specifically, two non-binding documents are considered: the International Labour Organization (ILO) Guidelines (2015) and the European Union (EU) Council Recommendation (2022). Using the Appraisal Framework, particularly the Judgement subsystem, the paper explores how these texts evaluate human behaviour and the ethical dimensions related to environmental transitions, addressing the following questions: How is this shift discursively framed in these documents? What are the potential implications of this terminological change in terms of stance-taking and reader reception regarding environmental issues? The findings reveal that while both the ILO Guidelines and the EU Recommendation emphasise the urgency of transitioning to greener economies, the ILO Guidelines advocate for a participatory ‘just’ transition, whereas the EU Recommendation promotes a more top-down ‘fair’ transition. This distinction aligns with Rawls’ theory of justice, with the ‘just’ transition reflecting a more inclusive approach.
About the author
Pietro Manzella is a Researcher in English Language, Linguistics and Translation at the Department of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Social Studies (DILL), University of Udine (Italy). His research focuses on legal and sustainability discourse, the use of language at the workplace and multilingualism. He has published in the areas of Translation Studies (TS) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).
References
Ala-Uddin, Mohammad. 2019. Sustainable discourse: A critical analysis of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Asia Pacific Media Educator 29(2). 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X19881515.Search in Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary. 2024a. Just. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/just (accessed 1 January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary. 2024b. Transition. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/transition (accessed 3 January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Catenaccio, Paola. 2019. Ethics and legitimacy in the discourse of agri-biotechnology: A study in argumentation. Anglistica AION 23(1). 195–216.Search in Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. 2022. Recommendation of 16 June 2022 on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022H0627%2804%29 (accessed 10 March 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Eckert, Eva & Kovalevska Oleksandra. 2021. Sustainability in the European Union: Analyzing the discourse of the European Green Deal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14(2). 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020080.Search in Google Scholar
Eurofound. 2024. Just transition. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/topic/just-transition (accessed 20 August 2024).Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2024. Types of EU law. https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/types-eu-law_en (accessed 21 February 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203697078Search in Google Scholar
International Labour Organization. 2015. Guidelines for a just transition. Towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_432859.pdf (accessed 20 November 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the inner city. Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
Machin, David & Yueyue Liu. 2024. How tick list sustainability distracts from actual sustainable action: The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Critical Discourse Studies 21(2). 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142272.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, James & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Martin, James & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna. 2024. The hybrid discourse of the ‘European Green Deal’: Road-mapping economic transition to environmental sustainability (almost) seamlessly. Critical Discourse Studies 21(2). 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2197607.Search in Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1958. Justice as fairness. Philosophical Review 67(2). 164–194. https://doi.org/10.2307/2182612.Search in Google Scholar
Stibbe, Arran. 2021. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780367855512Search in Google Scholar
Tomassetti, Paolo. 2022. From justice to fairness? https://www.etui.org/news/justice-fairness (accessed 20 September 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication 1(1). 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986.Search in Google Scholar
White, Peter. 2001. An introductory tour through Appraisal theory. https://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/appraisaloutline/framed/frame.htm (accessed 10 January 2024).Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Christopher. 2005. Tradition and change in legal English: Verbal constructions in prescriptive texts. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
