Positive ecological concepts in discourses of animals: an ecostylistic analysis of the documentary Wild China

References

Al-Shboul, Othman Khalid. 2023. The politics of climate change metaphors in the U.S. discourse: Conceptual metaphor theory and analysis from an ecolinguistics and critical discourse analysis perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-031-19016-2Search in Google Scholar

Alexander, Richard J. 2009. Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203890615Search in Google Scholar

Alexander, Richard J. 2018. Investigating texts about environmental degradation using critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistic techniques. In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 196–210. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-14Search in Google Scholar

Alexander, Richard J. & Arran Stibbe. 2014. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences 41. 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011.Search in Google Scholar

Bang, Jørgen Christian & Jørgen Døør. 2007. Language, ecology and society: A dialectical approach. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Bartlett, Tom. 2012. Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualizing positive discourse analysis. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203109373Search in Google Scholar

Caimotto, M. Cristina. 2020. Discourses of cycling, road users and sustainability: An ecolinguistic investigation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-44026-8Search in Google Scholar

Carvalho, Anabela. 2005. Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: Discursive strategies in the British media. Critical Discourse Studies 2(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900500052143.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Wenge, Tom Bartlett & Huiling Peng. 2021. The erasure of nature in the discourse of oil production: Part I of an enhanced eco-discourse analysis. Pragmatics and Society 12(1). 6–32. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20034.che.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Guy. 2015. ‘A pig is a person’ or ‘You can love a fox and hunt it’: Innovation and tradition in the discursive representation of animals. Discourse & Society 26(5). 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515576639.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, Guy & Alison Sealey. 2018. The discursive representation of animals. In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 311–324. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-21Search in Google Scholar

Do Couto, Hildo Honorio. 2014. Ecological approaches in linguistics: A historical overview. Language Sciences 41. 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Doulton, Hugh & Katrina Brown. 2009. Ten years to prevent catastrophe? Discourses of climate change and international development in the UK press. Global Environmental Change 19(2). 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.004.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. London: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin F. 2001. Ecolinguistics: State of the art 1998. In Alwin F. Fill & Peter Mühlhäusler (eds.), The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment, 43–53. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin F. & Hermine Penz. 2018. Ecolinguistics in the 21st century: New orientations and future directions. In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 437–443. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-30Search in Google Scholar

Gibbons, Alison & Sara Whiteley. 2018. Contemporary stylistics: Language, cognition, interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748682782Search in Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew. 1996. Green grammar and grammatical metaphor, or language and the myth of power, or metaphors we die by. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00057-7.Search in Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew. 2002. The representation of nature on the BBC World Service. Text 22(1). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.003.Search in Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew. 2006. Humans, animals, and metaphors. Society and Animals 14(1). 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853006776137131.Search in Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew. 2017. The poems of Edward Thomas: A case study in ecostylistics. In John Douthwaite, Daniela Francesca Virdis & Elisabetta Zurru (eds.), The stylistics of landscapes, the landscapes of stylistics, 95–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.28.07goaSearch in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1990. New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics 6. 7–36.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203783771Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Guowen & Ruihua Zhao. 2021. Harmonious discourse analysis: Approaching people’s problems in a Chinese context. Language Sciences 85. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101365.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 1999. Grace: The logogenesis of freedom. Discourse Studies 1(1). 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001003.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2004. Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. Revista Canaria DeEstudios Ingleses 49. 179–202.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Peter White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Milstein, Tema. 2011. Nature identification: The power of pointing and naming. Environmental Communication 5(1). 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.535836.Search in Google Scholar

Naess, Arne. 1995. The shallow and the long range, deep ecology movement. In Alan Drengson & Yuichi Inoue (eds.), The deep ecology movement: An introductory anthology, 3–10. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Poole, Robert. 2016. A corpus-aided ecological discourse analysis of the Rosemont Copper mine debate of Arizona, USA. Discourse & Communication 10(6). 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316674775.Search in Google Scholar

Poole, Robert. 2022. Corpus-assisted ecolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350138582Search in Google Scholar

Sealey, Alison & Lee Oakley. 2013. Anthropomorphic grammar? Some linguistic patterns in the wildlife documentary series life. Text & Talk 33(3). 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Stamou, Anastasia G. & Stephanos Paraskevopoulos. 2008. Representing protection action in an ecotourism setting: A critical discourse analysis of visitors’ books at a Greek reserve. Critical Discourse Studies 5(1). 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701768620.Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2001. Language, power, and the social construction of animals. Society and Animals 9(2). 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853001753639251.Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2010. Ecolinguistics and globalization. In Nikolas Coupland (ed.), The handbook of language and globalization, 406–425. West Sussex: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444324068.ch18Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2012. Animals erased: Discourse, ecology, and reconnection with the natural world. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2014. An ecolinguistic approach to critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies 11(1). 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.845789.Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2018a. Critical discourse analysis and ecology. In John Flowerdew & John E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies, 497–509. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315739342-34Search in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2018b. Positive discourse analysis: Rethinking human ecological relationships. In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 165–178. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-12Search in Google Scholar

Trampe, Wilhelm. 2018. Euphemisms for killing animals and for other forms of their use. In Alwin F. Fill & Hermine Penz (eds.), The Routledge handbook of ecolinguistics, 325–341. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-22Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4(3). 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006.Search in Google Scholar

Virdis, Daniela Francesca. 2022. Ecological stylistics: Ecostylistic approaches to discourses of nature, the environment and sustainability. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-031-10658-3Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth. 2011. Critical discourse analysis. In Ken Hyland & Brian Paltridge (eds.), The Continuum companion to discourse analysis, 38–53. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Zurru, Elisabetta. 2017. The agency of The Hungry Tide: An ecostylistic analysis. In John Douthwaite, Daniela Francesca Virdis & Elisabetta Zurru (eds.), The stylistics of landscapes, the landscapes of stylistics, 191–231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lal.28.10zurSearch in Google Scholar