Journal Open Access

Nietzsche-Studien

Internationales Jahrbuch für die Nietzsche-Forschung

Edited by: Christian J. Emden , Helmut Heit , Vanessa Lemm and Claus Zittel
Editorial Board: Günter Abel , R. Lanier Anderson , Rebecca Bamford , Christian Benne , Jessica Berry , Marco Brusotti , Joao Constancio , Daniel Conway , Luca Crescenzi , Maria Christina Fornari , Carlo Gentili , Oswaldo Giacoia Junior , Paolo D'Iorio , Anthony Jensen , Scarlett Marton , Martine Prange , Hans Ruin , Martin Saar , Carlotta Santini , Andreas Urs Sommer , Werner Stegmaier , Diana Aurenque Stephan , Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir , Isabelle Wienand and Patrick Wotling

Languages: German, English, French

First published: January 1, 1973

Publication Frequency: 1 issue per year

View latest issue

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

About this journal

Open Access

Starting 2022, Nietzsche-Studien will be transferred to Diamond Open Access on a year-by-year basis. All articles will thus appear without delay under the Creative Commons license CC-BY. There will be no publication costs for the authors. The Open Access transformation is based on Subscribe-to-Open.

The prerequisite for successful transformation is that subscriptions are continued to the same extent as before. The editors of Nietzsche-Studien and the publisher De Gruyter would therefore like to thank all subscribers for their support, which has made the transformation to Open Access possible.

You can find more information about the model here.

About the Yearbook

Friedrich Nietzsche has emerged as one of the most important and influential modern philosophers. Nietzsche-Studien is the premier publication shaping the field of Nietzsche studies. Interdisciplinary in orientation, and with a global reach, Nietzsche-Studien reflects the entire spectrum of research on Nietzsche. As it has for more than 50 years, Nietzsche-Studien continues to set the agenda in the rapidly growing and changing field of Nietzsche scholarship. We welcome submissions from philosophy, both "analytic" and "continental", political theory, literary studies, and intellectual history. Our languages of publication are English, German, and French.

An international team of editors whose work reflects the full range of current Nietzsche scholarship builds on the existing legacy of Nietzsche-Studien and expands the global reach of the journal. The chief editors of Nietzsche-Studien are supported by an advisory board of internationally renowned scholars from eleven countries, making Nietzsche-Studien unique in its global reach.　　

Please follow the Instructions for Authors before submitting your manuscript via ScholarOne: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nietzsche

For all queries, please contact us at Nietzsche-Studien@DeGruyter.com.

Corresponding book series "Monographien und Texte zur Nietzsche-Forschung": http://www.degruyter.com/view/serial/16098

Peer Review Policy

Nietzsche-Studien follows a double-blind peer review process:

Articles are submitted either by potential contributors directly or at the invitation of the journal editors. With the exception of commissioned book reviews and miscellaneous items that are directly reviewed by the editors, all research articles undergo a double-blind peer-review process.

If the editors agree that a submitted research article potentially merits publication, the article enters the peer-review process.

Research articles undergo a double-blind peer review, i.e., neither author(s) nor reviewers are aware of each other’s identities.

Research articles are usually reviewed by two external referees. A third external referee may be included if the reports submitted by the first two referees do not allow for a decision about the publication of a research article.

The peer review normally takes approximately four to six weeks, but in special circumstances, and depending on the volume of submissions, the allocated time can be extended.

Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editors decide and communicate to the author(s) whether, and on which grounds, the submitted article is "accepted," requires "minor" or "major revisions," or has to be "rejected." In case revisions are necessary, all the referees’ suggestions and queries must be taken into consideration and authors must document their responses and changes.

The editors make a final decision about the publication of every research article once all revisions have been made. The editors reserve the right to initiate an additional peer-review process if they deem necessary.

Open Access
Post für Nietzsche Dionysos. Zu Ecce homo, Warum ich so weise bin 3

September 5, 2025

Beat Röllin

Download PDF

Postal Delivery for Nietzsche Dionysos. On Ecce Homo, Why I Am So Wise 3 . A more authentic text of Ecce Homo appeared for the first time in KGW/KSA, thanks to the discovery of Why I Am So Wise 3 in Peter Gast’s estate. The found manuscript was a copy made by Heinrich Köselitz, alias Peter Gast, of a manuscript which Nietzsche had sent to C. G. Naumann for printing shortly before his collapse. Later, the manuscript was presumably destroyed. According to Naumann and Köselitz, the destroyed original dated from the end of December 1888. Montinari adopted this dating, but a preliminary draft preserved in the late Nachlass proves that the new text for Why I Am So Wise 3 was actually not written until the beginning of January 1889. From this new dating, we should take another look at Nietzsche’s last changes to the text of Ecce Homo . The reason for Nietzsche’s brutal reckoning with his mother and sister in Why I Am So Wise 3 must have been his mother’s New Year’s letter. The enigmatic postal delivery of a Dionysus head was possibly a frontispiece of Karl Frenzel in the January issue of the journal Die Gesellschaft .
Open Access
Neuerscheinungen zu Nietzsche und der Politik

September 2, 2025

Fabian Mauch

Download PDF

New Publications on Nietzsche and Politics . Nietzsche is one of the authors with the most intensive political reception, but also one of the most controversial. While the history of his political impact in the twentieth century has now been well researched, it is by no means complete, as the more recent publications discussed below show. The contributions in Nietzsche and the Politics of Reaction shed a sometimes critical, sometimes polemical light on the Nietzsche reception among authors of the American „New Right,“ while Paul Stephan attempts to re-found a left-wing Nietzsche reception with Links–Nietzscheanismus . In contrast, the anthology Nietzsches Perspektiven des Politischen clearly broadens the focus and examines both systematic and historical contexts of Nietzsche’s political thought up to the present day. Finally, from a historical perspective, Stefan Breuer deals with the Nietzsche and Wagner cults up to 1933, focusing on both their development and their interconnectedness and placing them in the wider context of the right-wing intellectual movements of the era.
Open Access
Recent Publications on Nietzsche’s Psychology and Its Legacy in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy

August 20, 2025

Gabriella Pelloni

Download PDF

The psychological dimension of Nietzsche’s thought has long attracted interest across various disciplines. However, the precise relationship between Nietzsche’s philosophical psychology and the modern traditions of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy remains contested. The six recent publications reviewed here approach this complex field from different perspectives: from Nietzsche’s reception in the works of Freud and Jung, to the role of Nietzschean motifs in contemporary therapeutic discourse, and the question of the “therapeutic” function of Nietzsche’s own philosophical writing. Together, these studies reveal both the productivity and the limits of applying clinical, psychoanalytic, or psychological frameworks to Nietzsche’s thought. They also highlight how Nietzsche himself – whether through his notions of drive, suffering, or transformation – may be read as a thinker of psychic processes rather than a systematic theorist of the psyche.
Open Access
Nietzsche on Reading Philosophers and Posthumous Friendship in Beyond Good and Evil 27–28

August 19, 2025

William Wood

Download PDF

This article presents a close reading of BGE 27 and 28, which concern how to read philosophical books and the kind of friendship such reading makes possible. In BGE 27, Nietzsche distinguishes three kinds of readers who have different paces of thought and life, comparable to rivers, frogs and tortoises. While he implies a hierarchy by saying some are “at best” comparable to frogs, he does not state explicitly which type is best. Most commentators assume “rivers” are ideal, but the article argues that Nietzsche is deliberately misleading; though he provokes this misinterpretation, he actually implies that “tortoises” are the best readers. Tortoise-like readers are often posthumous, reading authors who are already dead, but they enjoy a kind of friendship with the deceased unavailable to most contemporaries, who lack the right “nature.” The transition from BGE 27 to 28 reflects the shift from “good friends” among the living to true friends among the dead. The article also explores the idea of posthumous friendship in Nietzsche more broadly and suggests that his ideal of friendship as “shared joy” ( Mitfreude ), rather than “compassion” or “shared suffering” ( Mitleid ), is best realized in posthumous friendship with philosophers, which takes the form almost exclusively of shared joy.
Open Access
Auf den Spuren des Thrasymachos. Zu einer Anspielung auf Platons Politeia (336b–e) in GM I 9

August 19, 2025

Giorgio Leonardo Di Sarno

Download PDF

Tracing Thrasymachus. On a Reference to Plato’s Republic in GM I 9. This article examines an intertextual reference to Plato’s Republic (336b–e) in GM I 9. In addition to lexical and semantic parallels, it highlights structural and philosophical differences, focusing on the motifs of silence and interruption. By comparing Thrasymachus’s outburst in Republic I with the interjection of the „Democrat“ in GM I 9, the article reveals Nietzsche’s subtle appropriation and transformation of the Platonic dialogue form. Rather than endorsing Thrasymachus’s position, Nietzsche reconfigures the dialogical frame to stage the clash of opposing value systems and to question the legitimacy of philosophical justification itself, thus performing a critical, anti-Platonic reflection on moral discourse.
Open Access
Historischer und kritischer Kommentar zu Friedrich Nietzsches Werken

August 19, 2025

Aldo Venturelli

Download PDF

Historical and Critical Commentary on Friedrich Nietzsche’s Works. After almost fourteen years, the critical commentaries of Nietzsche’s published works is close to completion. Focused on a philologically detailed historical reconstruction of his published works, these critical commentaries, initially intended and extremely useful as a reference work, allow for a new and systematic overview of available scholarship, but they also open the door to new interpretations of Nietzsche’s works. Offering a substantially more detailed view of the different versions of these texts than the KGW or KSA, the critical commentaries underscore the open nature of Nietzsche’s thinking, clearly showing that each text, even after publication, always remains a work in progress. As Nietzsche’s published works proceed, they are marked by a continual self-reflection and an approach to philosophy that focuses on asking questions rather than on solving specific problems, thus integrating the reader into the process of philosophical thinking. As such, the commentaries clearly highlight that Nietzsche foregrounds the performative dimension of philosophical reflection.
Open Access
The Critique of Christianity in Celsus and Nietzsche: From Sedition to Resentment

July 26, 2025

Adilson Feiler

Download PDF

Celsus of Alexandria’s second-century invectives against the politics and culture of Christianity share prominent features with the problem of ressentiment as it emerges in Nietzsche’s analysis of Christianity as characterized by feelings of revenge and hatred. Against this background, it is possible to suggest that Nietzsche’s views of Christianity continue Celsus’s much earlier criticism of Christianity. This pertains especially to the relationship between Church and state, since the Church tends to impose itself on issues that fall within the purview of the secular state. Both Celsus and Nietzsche, thus, highlight the subversive nature of Christianity in their respective critiques, and it is thus subversive nature of Christianity’s relationship to the state that can be seen as a trigger of the ressentiment described by Nietzsche.
Open Access
Les saturnales de la poésie dans Le Gai savoir

June 5, 2025

Hélène Sicre

Download PDF

The Saturnalia of Poetry in The Gay Science . In 1882, The Gay Science was the first of Nietzsche’s works to include a large number of poems by the philosopher, a practice he owned up to in 1887 with the addition of Songs of Prince Vogelfrei . However, whether the texts are prose or poetry, the author never fails to parody, criticize – or even condemn – the artists and their art. The aim of this contribution is to highlight the role played by the simultaneity of such criticism and poetic practice: to reverse the ancillary position that poetry has held since the advent of theoretical optimism and, in so doing, to redefine its nature, role and status. This key step marks the transition from theory to practice in Nietzsche’s project of transvaluation.
Open Access
The Refusal of Ground: Thinking Nietzsche as Force

June 3, 2025

Dmitri G. Safronov

Download PDF

This essay begins with a warning: Nietzsche has not been understood. What parades as interpretation is John Sallis’ “deceptive intelligibility” – a hall of mirrors masquerading as clarity, engineered to bury Nietzsche’s philosophical sabotage. Nietzsche’s thought, like quantum theory, explodes causality, truth, and identity – not metaphorically, but ontologically. His aphorisms do not simply describe the world; they interfere with it. They collapse the observer into the observed, entangling meaning with force, knowledge with will, thought with becoming. He is not a philosopher of answers but of ruptures – epistemic fractures that reverberate across disciplines and time. Art, science, philosophy and myth combust into co-authored vortices – no maps, only collisions of perspective. From Heraclitus to Heisenberg, from tragic myth to wave-particle paradoxes, Nietzsche’s legacy emerges as a gravitational field – disabling our coordinates, annihilating philosophical ground. The five outstanding explorations of Nietzsche’s philosophy reviewed here do not explain Nietzsche; they accelerate his destabilizing charge, colliding at the edges of interpretation to generate new hybrids of thought. Against the fixity of meaning, Nietzsche offers a reality in superposition. The question is no longer what Nietzsche meant, but how much conceptual collapse we can endure when we stop containing him. To understand Nietzsche is not simply to interpret, but to embrace Nietzschean singularity.
Open Access
Carl Fuchs (1838–1922). Ein Musiker im Umfeld von Arthur Schopenhauer, Hugo Riemann und Friedrich Nietzsche

May 29, 2025

Wilfried Gruhn

Download PDF

Carl Fuchs (1838–1922). A Musician in the Circle of Arthur Schopenhauer, Hugo Riemann, and Friedrich Nietzsche. The musician, music writer and composer Carl Fuchs was associated with the inner circle of friends around Friedrich Nietzsche and has always been seen as a follower of Arthur Schopenhauer and the famous lexicographer Hugo Riemann. However, the relation was much more differentiated with respect to the doctrine of musical phrasing and the metrics in music and poetry. Fuchs was an esteemed writer of music books on theoretical, aesthetic, and philosophical issues. These publications (especially his early dissertation) aroused Nietzsche’s interest and opened a long-lasting friendship documented by the correspondence between 1873 and 1888. Based on the accessible sources, this contribution will shed new light on the biographical relations and internal intellectual connections between Schopenhauer, Nietzsche/Wagner, and Riemann.
Open Access
Nietzsche als Kirchenvater des 21. Jahrhunderts?

May 29, 2025

Alexander Dietz

Download PDF

Nietzsche as a Twenty-First-Century Church Father? The first section, “Nietzsche as a Theologian,” reflects on whether Nietzsche can be described as a theologian and which theological positions he represented (image of God, ethics, Christology, soteriology). The second section, “Nietzsche’s Influence on Theology,” presents the reception of Nietzsche in twentieth-century theology, particularly with regard to the concept of truth, the image of God, orientation toward this world, secularization, and anthropology. The third section, “What Theology and the Church Can Learn from Nietzsche Today,” argues that Nietzsche can provide important suggestions for twenty-first-century theology, especially with regard to overcoming a purely historicizing approach, regaining competence in the critique of ideology, a necessary critique of moralization, a search for new forms of spirituality, and overcoming trivializing images of God.
Open Access
Licht aus der Nacht: Nietzsches philosophische Umwertung des Lichts. Zum Nachtlied in Za II

May 16, 2025

Werner Stegmaier

Download PDF

Light from the Night: Nietzsche’s Philosophical Reevaluation of Light. On the Night Song in Za II. The Night Song in the Second Part of Thus Spoke Zarathustra has been much admired, most of all by Nietzsche himself, as a unique lament about his loneliness in the “language of love.” At the same time, it seems to be proof of an extreme self-aggrandizement, a pathological megalomania. In both cases, the philosophical meaning of the Night Song is passed over. It arises from the Enlightenment metaphors of light and night as their reversal in nihilism: nihilism, the loss of all certainties from a universal and all-illuminating reason, liberates us from the illusions of this reason in favor of a new orientation, the certainties of which individuals must “create” for themselves. Moreover, the individuals suffer from the different superiorities and inferiorities of their orientations, their “rank orders,” and must now try to gain each other through love, or at least in the language of love, as the unreserved encounter of individuals. In the Night Song , Nietzsche has Zarathustra, to whom he ascribes the highest superiority of orientation, experience a personal crisis of orientation, regain his cheerfulness in the following Dance Song and his “will” to elevate humanity as a whole in the Funeral Song .
Open Access
Pessimism and Eternity: A Dialogue between Schopenhauer and Nietzsche

May 6, 2025

Laura Langone

Download PDF

Bringing into dialogue the philosophical systems of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche cannot do without investigating pessimism and eternity – issues to which both thinkers attached great significance. The authors analysed in this essay, Martin Morgenstern and Christopher Janaway, partly touch on such issues. Unfortunately, both perpetuate the long-standing opposition between Schopenhauer’s supposed hopeless pessimism and Nietzsche’s life-affirming philosophy. In contrast, I will show how this opposition is no longer tenable. During aesthetic contemplation, Schopenhauer’s genius finds a way to take an interest in the world despite its evils. The genius exhibits a passionate engagement with knowledge, allowing aesthetic affects to come into play, just as Nietzsche’s artist intensifies and multiplies the affects to achieve a more comprehensive perspective on reality. The shared attitudes of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche towards knowledge reveal deep and often overlooked connections among their philosophical systems. It is in the realm of aesthetics that pessimism and eternity can come together.
Open Access
Neuerscheinungen zu Nietzsches Der Antichrist und der „Umwertung aller Werte“

April 24, 2025

Giorgio Leonardo Di Sarno

Download PDF

New Publications on Nietzsche’s The Antichrist and the „Revaluation of All Values“. Recent publications on The Antichrist and the „revaluation of all values“ reflect a growing interest in the philosophical depth of Nietzsche’s late writings. Among the five discussed works, three explicitly engage with the philosophical content of The Antichrist (Conway 2019, Meier 2019, Bishop 2022), while the others interpret the motif of a „revaluation of all values“ either as a description of Nietzsche’s philosophy as a whole (Guo 2022) or in the context of an unwritten magnum opus (Brobjer 2021). This review brings these approaches into dialogue with research that the authors either consult in a highly selective manner or disregard entirely. Regarding The Antichrist , it becomes particularly evident that neglecting this research often leads to the repetition of aporetic positions.
Open Access
Menschliches, Allzumenschliches, Morgenröthe und Der Wanderer und sein Schatten

March 5, 2025

Johannes Heinrich

Download PDF

Human, All Too Human , Dawn and The Wanderer and His Shadow . Assigned to Nietzsche’s so-called “middle period,” Human, All Too Human and Dawn have received much less attention than many of his early or later works. Several recent publications attempt to correct this, including the four volumes discussed in this review essay. There are a number of recurring themes, such as Nietzsche’s writing style and the question whether, and to what extent, The Wanderer and His Shadow should be regarded as a separate work within Nietzsche’s œuvre. While Abbey as well as Ansell-Pearson and Bamford take a more general approach that seeks to provide an introductory overview of Nietzsche’s middle period, Brücker as well and Boehm and Villwock are focused specifically on The Wanderer and His Shadow , addressing the meaning of the metaphor of “wanderer and shadow” throughout Nietzsche’s work.
Open Access
„lisez: Nietzsche“. Anmerkungen zu Nietzsches letztem Buch

March 4, 2025

Wolfram Groddeck

Download PDF

“lisez: Nietzsche”. Remarks on Nietzsche’s Last Book. From the perspective of textual criticism, Nietzsche’s last book Ecce Homo – written in 1888, but published for the first time only in 1908 – is as ambiguous as it is controversial. Although Nietzsche completed Ecce Homo , a close reading that focuses on his writing strategies reveals a more fragmentary status. As such, Ecce Homo continues to provide complex editorial and philological problems that undercut any straightforward reading of the book: focusing on Ecce Homo’ s paratext highlights how Nietzsche reads himself, thus complicating the relationship between his writings and their reception.
Open Access
Nietzsche’s “Sensualism” from 1885 to 1888

January 17, 2025

Alexander Rueger

Download PDF

After having held through much of his career the view that our senses and our intellect falsify the world, Nietzsche published in Twilight of the Idols the claim that the senses do not lie at all. A preparation for this apparent change of mind has often been seen in BGE 15, where Nietzsche seems to recommend “sensualism,” at least for scientists working on the physiology of the senses. I try to characterize in some detail what “sensualism” means by drawing on contemporary discussions and suggest a clarifying reading of the argument in BGE 15. Nietzsche’s attitude towards sensualism, however, is ambivalent. It is a suitable view to hold for scientists engaged in accomplishing “coarse tasks.” But there is a nobler way of doing science, exemplified by Copernicus and Boscovich who “triumphed over the senses.” I explicate this more nuanced attitude towards sensualism and suggest that the senses do not lie insofar as they show us change , that is, temporal relations between events, while they do lie about the events themselves. This happens to be a view that the eminent physiologist of the senses, Helmholtz, had arrived at in 1867.
Open Access
Nietzsche on the Poverty and Possibility of Human Love: Jesus, Dionysus, Zarathustra

December 18, 2024

Melanie Shepherd

Download PDF

Nietzsche’s portrait of Jesus as a lovesick knower of the heart in BGE 269 aligns the problems of Christian love with some of Nietzsche’s critical remarks about erotic love in the Free Spirit works. In this paper, I will examine the nuances of Nietzsche’s criticisms of erotic and of Christian love and demonstrate that in their failures, they also contain potential for forms of love that Nietzsche celebrates: self-love, friendship, and amor fati. Finally, I consider Beyond Good and Evil in the context of Book IX, arguing that the chapter does not resolve with Dionysus as Nietzsche’s final response to Jesus, but instead that the duality between them marks different kinds of deficiencies regarding love, to which Nietzsche responds with his Zarathustra.
Open Access
Foucault’s Culturalist Axiomatic: A Nietzschean Naturalist Rejoinder

October 15, 2024

Tvrtko Vrdoljak

Download PDF

The Nietzsche-Foucault relationship has been the subject of extensive scholarship, highlighting their affinity. In contrast, this paper foregrounds what I take to be their most significant point of divergence: it compares Nietzsche’s naturalist to Foucault’s culturalist axiomatic of power. First, I introduce a minor, naturalist tradition in the philosophy of power that culminates with Nietzsche. Second, I show how Foucault revolutionized the field of political thought and analysis by drawing on Nietzsche’s critique of logocentrism, and in so doing introduced a different and significantly more expansive image of politics. Third, I survey Foucault’s key writings on power to support the claim that the contrast between Nietzsche and Foucault can be described in terms of a contrast between naturalism and culturalism. Finally, I follow this theme in the writings of “new materialist” thinkers and their ambiguous reception of Foucault. Although Foucault is often read as politicizing Nietzsche, his circumscribing of power-relations to intra-human relations alone, and thereby confining politics to human cultures, in effect led to him depoliticizing Nietzsche.

Issue 0

Issue 1

to be implemented...

Issue 0

Issue 53

Issue 52

Issue 51

Issue 50

Issue 49

Issue 48

Issue 47

Issue 46

Issue 45

Issue 44

Issue 43

Issue 42

Issue 41

Issue 40

Issue 39

Issue 38

Issue 37

Issue 36

Issue 35

Issue 34

Issue 33

Issue 32

Issue 31

Issue 30

Issue 20a

Issue 29

Issue 28

Issue 27

Issue 26

Issue 25

Issue 24

Issue 23

Issue 22

Issue 21

Issue 20

Issue 19

Issue 18

Issue 17

Issue 16

Issue 15

Issue 14

Issue 13

Issue 12

Issue 10

Issue 9

Issue 8

Issue 7

Issue 6

Issue 5

Issue 4

Issue 3

Issue 2

Issue 1

CiteScore	0.5	2024, Scopus (Elsevier B.V., 2025)
SCImago Journal Rank	0.133	2024, SJR (Scimago Lab, 2025; Data Source: Scopus)
Source Normalized Impact per Paper	1.054	2024, CWTS Journal Indicators (CWTS B.V., 2025; Data Source: Scopus)

More information about journal rankings

Editors
Christian J. Emden, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Helmut Heit, Klassik Stiftung Weimar, Germany
Vanessa Lemm, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
Claus Zittel, University of Stuttgart, Germany

Editorial Advisory Board
Günter Abel, TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany
R.Lanier Anderson, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Diana Aurenque, Universidad de Santiago de Chile
Rebecca Bamford, Queen´s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Christian Benne, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Jessica Berry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
Marco Brusotti, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
João Constâncio, IFILNOVA, Lisbon, Portugal
Daniel Conway, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Luca Crescenzi, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
Maria Cristina Fornari, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
Paolo d’Iorio, ITEM (CNRS/ENS), Paris, France
Carlo Gentili, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Oswaldo Giacoia, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
Anthony Jensen, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA
Scarlett Marton, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Martine Prange, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
Hans Ruin, Södertörn University, Södertörn, Sweden
Martin Saar, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Carlotta Santini, ENS, Paris, France
Andreas Urs Sommer, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Werner Stegmaier, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
Isabelle Wienand, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Patrick Wotling, University of Reims, Reims, France

Editorial Office
Benjamin Alberts

Please submit your manuscript via ScholarOne: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/nietzsche

Nietzsche-Studien is covered by the following services:

Baidu Scholar
BDSL Bibliographie der deutschen Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Genamics JournalSeek
Germanistik
Google Scholar
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Ingenta Connect
International Philosophical Bibliography - Répertoire bibliographique de la Philosophie
J-Gate
JournalGuide
MLA International Bibliography
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Norwegian Register for Scientific Journals, Series and Publishers
OLC Germanistik
Philosopher's Index
PhilPapers
Primo Central (ExLibris)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
ScienceON (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
Scilit
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Emerging Sources Citation Index
WorldCat (OCLC)
X-MOL
Yewno Discover

Online Submission of Manuscripts

Journal information

Additional information

eISSN:

1613-0790

ISSN:

0342-1422

Languages:

German, English, French

Publisher:

De Gruyter

Additional information

First published:

January 1, 1973

Publication Frequency:

1 issue per year

eISSN: 1613-0790

ISSN: 0342-1422

Safety & product resources

Manufacturer information:
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Genthiner Straße 13
10785 Berlin
productsafety@degruyterbrill.com

Creative Commons

BY 4.0

Nietzsche-Studien

About this journal

Supplementary Materials

Topics

Nietzsche-Studien

Overview

About this journal

Ahead of Publication / Just Accepted

Issues

Ranking

Editorial

Abstracting and Indexing

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials

Topics

Topics

External Links

Bibliographic data