Home Chapter Three Work conditions
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter Three Work conditions

View more publications by Policy Press
The Ann Oakley reader
This chapter is in the book The Ann Oakley reader

Abstract

One preoccupation of the sociology of industrial work has been the causes of job dissatisfaction. What accounts for the fact that some workers are satisfied, while others are not? Certain patterns of job satisfaction or dissatisfaction seem to be associated with particular kinds of jobs. Thus jobs which involve social interaction with other workers are generally more satisfying than socially isolated work; monotonous, repetitive work is more likely to be linked with job dissatisfaction than more varied work; jobs which involve responsibility and the ability to organise work time and work methods are generally preferred over those which lack these qualities, and so forth (Parker et al, 1967). It would seem that one source of industrial discontent in the modern world is the structure and content of work itself.

This is a general conclusion. But does it apply to the case of the housewife? Answers given by the 40 women in the sample suggest that certain characteristics of housework may be more or less uniformly experienced as dissatisfying, while others are potentially rewarding. Hence it would seem both helpful and important to examine a number of aspects of work that industrial sociology has highlighted as critical in the explanation of job satisfaction. These are the experiences of monotony, fragmentation and excessive pace in work and social interaction patterns. Two other dimensions of work, which have been found less important in the case of the industrial worker, are also looked at in this chapter: working hours and the technical environment.

A common charge levelled against housework is that it is inherently monotonous and repetitive.

Abstract

One preoccupation of the sociology of industrial work has been the causes of job dissatisfaction. What accounts for the fact that some workers are satisfied, while others are not? Certain patterns of job satisfaction or dissatisfaction seem to be associated with particular kinds of jobs. Thus jobs which involve social interaction with other workers are generally more satisfying than socially isolated work; monotonous, repetitive work is more likely to be linked with job dissatisfaction than more varied work; jobs which involve responsibility and the ability to organise work time and work methods are generally preferred over those which lack these qualities, and so forth (Parker et al, 1967). It would seem that one source of industrial discontent in the modern world is the structure and content of work itself.

This is a general conclusion. But does it apply to the case of the housewife? Answers given by the 40 women in the sample suggest that certain characteristics of housework may be more or less uniformly experienced as dissatisfying, while others are potentially rewarding. Hence it would seem both helpful and important to examine a number of aspects of work that industrial sociology has highlighted as critical in the explanation of job satisfaction. These are the experiences of monotony, fragmentation and excessive pace in work and social interaction patterns. Two other dimensions of work, which have been found less important in the case of the industrial worker, are also looked at in this chapter: working hours and the technical environment.

A common charge levelled against housework is that it is inherently monotonous and repetitive.

Downloaded on 26.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.56687/9781447342434-013/html
Scroll to top button