Startseite New approaches to plastic language: Prolegomena to a computer-aided approach to pictorial semiotics
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

New approaches to plastic language: Prolegomena to a computer-aided approach to pictorial semiotics

  • Everardo Reyes EMAIL logo und Göran Sonesson
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. August 2019

Abstract

In this paper we summarize observations bridging the declared aspirations of pictorial semiotics and its real achievements. Pictorial semiotics is here understood as the general study of pictures as signs and it constituted a fundamental step beyond the art historical captivation with individual images. In the first part of our contribution we present a review of the most important methods that have been proposed as an answer to deal with several pictorial problems (multiple instances, segmentation, non-figurative meaning). In the second part, we offer some positive and on-going implementations designed to remedy the shortcomings observed. What is suggested is the proof of concept that human researchers need the assistance of computing methodologies. However, computers can only do their job once an adequate phenomenology of human experience is fed into the process.

References

Barthes, R. 1964. Rhétorique de l’image. Communications 4. 40–51.10.3406/comm.1964.1027Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, C.-Y., D. Jayaraman, F. Sha & K. Grauman. 2017. Divide, share, and conquer: Multi-task attribute learning with selective sharing. In R. S. Feris, C. Lampert & D. Parikh (eds.), Visual attributes, 50–85. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-50077-5_4Suche in Google Scholar

Del Bimbo, A. 1999. Visual information retrieval. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Suche in Google Scholar

Deledalle, G. 1979. Théorie et pratique du signe. Paris: Payot.Suche in Google Scholar

DeLoache, J. 2004. Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(2). 66–70.10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.004Suche in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Suche in Google Scholar

Floch, J.-M. 1978. Roland Barthes: “Sémiotique de l’image”. Bulletin du Groupe de Recherches Sémio-linguistiques 4(5). 27–32.Suche in Google Scholar

Floch, J.-M. 1981. Kandinsky: Sémiotique d’un discours plastique non-figuratif. Communications 34. 134–158.10.3406/comm.1981.1511Suche in Google Scholar

Floch, J.-M. 1984. Petites mythologies de l’oeil et l’esprit. Paris: Hadès.10.1075/as.1Suche in Google Scholar

Floch, J.-M. 1986. Les formes de l’empreinte. Périgueux: Pierre Fanlac.Suche in Google Scholar

Floch, J.-M. 1990. Sémiotique, marketing et communication. Paris: PUF.Suche in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, R. & R. Woods. 2008. Digital image processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Suche in Google Scholar

Greimas, A. & J. Courtés. 1979. Sémiotique: Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.Suche in Google Scholar

Groupe µ. 1992. Traité du signe visuel. Paris: Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

Groys, B. 2016. In the flow. London: Verso.Suche in Google Scholar

Hribar, A., G. Sonesson & J. Call. 2014. From sign to action: Studies in chimpanzee pictorial competence. Semiotica 198(1/4). 205–240.10.1515/sem-2013-0108Suche in Google Scholar

Jappy, T. 2010. Introduction to Peircean visual semiotics. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirsch, J. & R. Kirsch. 1988. The anatomy of painting style: description with computer rules. Leonardo 21(4). 437–444.10.2307/1578708Suche in Google Scholar

Krampen, M. (ed.). 1983. Visuelle kommunikation und/oder verbale kommunikation. Hildesheim & Berlin: Olms Verlag/Hochschule der Kiinste.Suche in Google Scholar

Lenninger, S. 2012. When similarity qualifies as a sign: A study in picture understanding and semiotic development in young children. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Suche in Google Scholar

Lindekens, R. 1976. Éléments de sémiotique visuelle. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar

Manovich, L. 2011. What is visualization? Visual Studies 26(1). 36–49.10.1080/1472586X.2011.548488Suche in Google Scholar

Müller, W., T. Nocke & H. Schumann. 2006. Enhancing the visualization process with principal component analysis to support the exploration of trends. In Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualization (APVIS’06), 121–130. Darlinghurst: Australian Computer Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Parker, J. R. 2011. Algorithms for image processing and computer vision. Indianapolis: Wiley.Suche in Google Scholar

Russ, J. 2011. The image processing handbook. Boca Raton: CRC.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. 1988. Methods and models in pictorial semiotics. Lund: Lund University.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. 1989a. Pictorial concepts. Lund: Lund University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. 1989b. Semiotics of photography: On tracing the index. Lund: Lund University.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. 1994. Les rondeurs secrètes de la ligne droite: A propos de “Sans titre” de Rothko. Les Nouveaux Actes Sémiotiques 34–35. 41–76.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. 2010. Pictorial semiotics. In T. Sebeok & M. Danesi (eds.), Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics. Berlin: Mouton. https://www.degruyter.com/view/EDS/pictorial_semiotics (accessed 26 August 2019).Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. 2011. La rhétorique des transformations homogènes. In T. Migliore (ed.), Retorica del visibili, 309–320. Rome: Aracne.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. 2014. The psychology and semiotics of the picture sign. In D. Machin (ed.), Handbook of visual communication, 23–50. Berlin: DeGruyter.10.1515/9783110255492.23Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, G. & S. Lenninger. 2015. The psychological development of semiotic competence: From the window to the movie by way of the mirror. Cognitive Development 36. 191–201.10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.007Suche in Google Scholar

Thürleman, F. 1982. Paul Klee: Analyse sémiotique de trois peintures. Lausanne: L’age de l’homme.Suche in Google Scholar

Thürleman, F. 1990. Vom bild zum raum. Köln: DuMont.Suche in Google Scholar

Zlatev, J., A. Madsen, S. Lenninger, T. Persson, S. Sayehli, G. Sonesson & J. van de Weijer. 2013. Understanding communicative intentions and semiotic vehicles by children and chimpanzees. Cognitive Development 28. 312–329.10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.05.001Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-08-28
Published in Print: 2019-10-25

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Introduction to Meaningful data/Données signifiantes
  3. A data-driven computational semiotics: The semantic vector space of Magritte’s artworks
  4. New approaches to plastic language: Prolegomena to a computer-aided approach to pictorial semiotics
  5. Mesures et savoirs : Quelles méthodes pour l’histoire culturelle à l’heure du big data ?
  6. Visual semiotics and automatic analysis of images from the Cultural Analytics Lab: How can quantitative and qualitative analysis be combined?
  7. Uncertain infographics: Expressing doubt in data visualization
  8. Quelques expériences pour développer l’expression de sens en cartographie thématique
  9. Raw data or hypersymbols? Meaning-making with digital data, between discursive processes and machinic procedures
  10. Differential heterogenesis and the emergence of semiotic function
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Semiotic alignment: Towards a dialogical model of interspecific communication
  13. Modal functioning of rhetorical resources in selected multimodal cartoons
  14. The mission of the Chinese puzzle: From a quest for order to seeking entertainment
  15. Memes, genes, and signs: Semiotics in the conceptual interface of evolutionary biology and memetics
  16. Formalisation sémiotique de la traduction : Le modèle transformationnel d’Alexandre Ljudskanov
  17. Glossopoesis in Thomas More’s Utopia: Beyond a representation of foreignness
  18. Playing peripatos: Creativity and abductive inference in religion, art and war
  19. Borders and translation: Revisiting Juri Lotman’s semiosphere
  20. Peirce’s philosophy of communication and language communication
  21. Mythic symbolic type, utopia, and body without organs
  22. The contribution of narrative semiotics of experiential imaginary to the ideation of new digital customer experiences
  23. Transference of brand personality in brand name translation: A case study on the Chinese-English translation of men’s clothing brands
  24. Intertextuality as a strategy of glocalization: A comparative study of Nike’s and Adidas’s 2008 advertising campaigns in China
  25. The semiotic web of the research proposal
  26. Sic vita est: Visual representation in painting of the conceptual metaphor LIFE IS A JOURNEY
Heruntergeladen am 20.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2018-0106/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen