Startseite Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines

Systems Biology: Integrating Biological Sciences
  • Maya Madhavan EMAIL logo und Sabeena Mustafa
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. Januar 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Manuskript einreichen Informationen für Autor*innen
Physical Sciences Reviews
Aus der Zeitschrift Physical Sciences Reviews Band 8 Heft 9

Abstract

Life science is the study of living organisms, including bacteria, plants, and animals. Given the importance of biology, chemistry, and bioinformatics, we anticipate that this chapter may contribute to a better understanding of the interdisciplinary connections in life science. Research in applied biological sciences has changed the paradigm of basic and applied research. Biology is the study of life and living organisms, whereas science is a dynamic subject that as a result of constant research, new fields are constantly emerging. Some fields come and go, whereas others develop into new, well-recognized entities. Chemistry is the study of composition of matter and its properties, how the substances merge or separate and also how substances interact with energy. Advances in biology and chemistry provide another means to understand the biological system using many interdisciplinary approaches. Bioinformatics is a multidisciplinary or rather transdisciplinary field that encourages the use of computer tools and methodologies for qualitative and quantitative analysis. There are many instances where two fields, biology and chemistry have intersection. In this chapter, we explain how current knowledge in biology, chemistry, and bioinformatics, as well as its various interdisciplinary domains are merged into life sciences and its applications in biological research.

Keywords: biosensors; biofuels; metabolic engineering; modelling; synthetic biology; systems biology
Corresponding author: Maya Madhavan, Department of Biochemistry, Government College for Women, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Lewis, J, Bartlett, A, Atkinson, P. Hidden in the middle: culture, value and reward in bioinformatics. Minerva 2016;54:471–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9304-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Gasperskaja, E, Kučinskas, V. The most common technologies and tools for functional genome analysis. Acta Med Litu 2017;24:1–11. https://doi.org/10.6001/actamedica.v24i1.3457.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Bartlett, A, Lewis, J, Williams, ML. Generations of interdisciplinarity in bioinformatics. New Genet Soc 2016;35:186–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2016.1184965.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Bayat, A. Science, medicine, and the future: bioinformatics. BMJ 2002;324:1018–22. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7344.1018.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Trewavas, A. A brief history of systems biology. “Every object that biology studies is a system of systems.” Francois Jacob (1974). Plant Cell 2006;18:2420–30. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.042267.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Hood, L, Rowen, L. The human genome project: big science transforms biology and medicine. Genome Med 2013;5:79. https://doi.org/10.1186/gm483.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Wake, MH. Integrative biology: science for the 21st Century. Bioscience 2008;58:349–53. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580410.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Gupta, MK, Misra, K. A holistic approach for integration of biological systems and usage in drug discovery. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform 2016;5:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13721-015-0111-4.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Tavassoly, I, Goldfarb, J, Iyengar, R. Systems biology primer: the basic methods and approaches. Essays Biochem 2018;62:487–500. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20180003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Stelling, J. Mathematical models in microbial systems biology. Curr Opin Microbiol 2004;7:513–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2004.08.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Ideker, T, Lauffenburger, D. Building with a scaffold: emerging strategies for high- to low-level cellular modeling. Trends Biotechnol 2003;21:255–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00115-X.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Likić, VA, McConville, MJ, Lithgow, T, Bacic, A. Systems biology: the next Frontier for bioinformatics. Adv Bioinf 2010;2010:268925. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/268925.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Sevimoglu, T, Arga, KY. The role of protein interaction networks in systems biomedicine. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2014;11:22–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2014.08.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Pandey, UB, Nichols, CD. Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacol Rev 2011;63:411–36. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.110.003293.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Doni Jayavelu, N. Integrative systems biology approaches for analyzing high-throughput data: applications to modeling of gene regulatory networks. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Sobie, EA, Lee, Y-S, Jenkins, SL, Iyengar, R. Systems biology—biomedical modeling. Sci Signal 2011;4:tr2 LP–tr2. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2001989.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Shahzad, K, Loor, JJ. Application of top-down and bottom-up systems approaches in ruminant physiology and metabolism. Curr Genom 2012;13:379–94. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920212801619269.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Bruggeman, FJ, Westerhoff, HV. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol 2007;15:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2006.11.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Oltvai, ZN, Barabási, A-L. Systems biology. Life’s complexity pyramid. Science 2002;298:763–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078563.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Reeves, GT, Hrischuk, CE. Survey of engineering models for systems biology. Comput Biol J 2016;2016:4106329. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4106329.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Emmert-Streib, F, Dehmer, M, Haibe-Kains, B. Gene regulatory networks and their applications: understanding biological and medical problems in terms of networks. Front Cell Dev Biol 2014;2:38. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2014.00038.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Aguda, BD, Goryachev, AB. From pathways databases to network models of switching behavior. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3:1674–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030152.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Hass, H, Loos, C, Raimúndez-Álvarez, E, Timmer, J, Hasenauer, J, Kreutz, C. Benchmark problems for dynamic modeling of intracellular processes. Bioinformatics 2019;35:3073–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz020.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Benner, SA, Sismour, AM. Synthetic biology. Nat Rev Genet 2005;6:533–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1637.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Lucks, JB, Qi, L, Whitaker, WR, Arkin, AP. Toward scalable parts families for predictable design of biological circuits. Curr Opin Microbiol 2008;11:567–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2008.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Tyagi, A, Kumar, A, Aparna, SV, Mallappa, RH, Grover, S, Batish, VK. Synthetic biology: applications in the food sector. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2016;56:1777–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2013.782534.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Mortimer, JC. Plant synthetic biology could drive a revolution in biofuels and medicine. Exp Biol Med 2018;244:323–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370218793890.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Slomovic, S, Pardee, K, Collins, JJ. Synthetic biology devices for in vitro and in vivo diagnostics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112:14429–35. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508521112.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Cameron, DE, Bashor, CJ, Collins, JJ. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014;12:381–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3239.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Del Vecchio, D, Ninfa, AJ, Sontag, ED. Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation. Mol Syst Biol 2008;4:161. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100204.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Mishra, D, Rivera, PM, Lin, A, Del Vecchio, D, Weiss, R. A load driver device for engineering modularity in biological networks. Nat Biotechnol 2014;32:1268–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3044.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. de Lorenzo, V, Danchin, A. Synthetic biology: discovering new worlds and new words. EMBO Rep 2008;9:822–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.159.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Kumar, RM, Cahan, P, Shalek, AK, Satija, R, Jay DaleyKeyser, A, Li, H, et al.. Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2014;516:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13920.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Kim, KH, Qian, H, Sauro, HM. Nonlinear biochemical signal processing via noise propagation. J Chem Phys 2013;139:144108. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4822103.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Cobb, RE, Si, T, Zhao, H. Directed evolution: an evolving and enabling synthetic biology tool. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2012;16:285–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.05.186.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Burgos-Morales, O, Gueye, M, Lacombe, L, Nowak, C, Schmachtenberg, R, Hörner, M, et al.. Synthetic biology as driver for the biologization of materials sciences. Mater Today Bio 2021;11:100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100115.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Zhou, Q, Zhan, H, Liao, X, Fang, L, Liu, Y, Xie, H, et al.. A revolutionary tool: CRISPR technology plays an important role in construction of intelligentized gene circuits. Cell Prolif 2019;52:e12552. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12552.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

38. Nielsen, AAK, Segall-Shapiro, TH, Voigt, CA. Advances in genetic circuit design: novel biochemistries, deep part mining, and precision gene expression. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2013;17:878–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.10.003.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Chen, Y-J, Liu, P, Nielsen, AAK, Brophy, JAN, Clancy, K, Peterson, T, et al.. Characterization of 582 natural and synthetic terminators and quantification of their design constraints. Nat Methods 2013;10:659–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2515.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Gibson, DG, Glass, JI, Lartigue, C, Noskov, VN, Chuang, R-Y, Algire, MA, et al.. Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 2010;329:52–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190719.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Hillson, NJ, Rosengarten, RD, Keasling, JD. j5 DNA assembly design automation software. ACS Synth Biol 2012;1:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb2000116.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Brophy, JAN, Voigt, CA. Principles of genetic circuit design. Nat Methods 2014;11:508–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2926.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Cong, L, Ran, FA, Cox, D, Lin, S, Barretto, R, Habib, N, et al.. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013;339:819–23. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231143.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Khalil, AS, Collins, JJ. Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:367–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2775.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Mehrotra, P. Biosensors and their applications – a review. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res 2016;6:153–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.12.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Thavarajah, W, Verosloff, MS, Jung, JK, Alam, KK, Miller, JD, Jewett, MC, et al.. A primer on emerging field-deployable synthetic biology tools for global water quality monitoring. Npj Clean Water 2020;3:18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-020-0064-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

47. Bulich, AA, Isenberg, DL. Use of the luminescent bacterial system for the rapid assessment of aquatic toxicity. ISA Trans 1981;20:29–33.Suche in Google Scholar

48. Belkin, S, Smulski, DR, Vollmer, AC, Van Dyk, TK, LaRossa, RA. Oxidative stress detection with Escherichia coli harboring a katG’::lux fusion. Appl Environ Microbiol 1996;62:2252–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.7.2252-2256.1996.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Gui, Q, Lawson, T, Shan, S, Yan, L, Liu, Y. The application of whole cell-based biosensors for use in environmental analysis and in medical diagnostics. Sensors 2017;17:1623. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17071623.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. Ishino, Y, Krupovic, M, Forterre, P. History of CRISPR-Cas from encounter with a mysterious repeated sequence to genome editing technology. J Bacteriol 2018;200:e00580–17. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00580-17.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51. Li, Y, Li, S, Wang, J, Liu, G. CRISPR/Cas systems towards next-generation biosensing. Trends Biotechnol 2019;37:730–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.12.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Green, AA, Silver, PA, Collins, JJ, Yin, P. Toehold switches: de-novo-designed regulators of gene expression. Cell 2014;159:925–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

53. Liu, L, He, F, Yu, Y, Wang, Y. Application of FRET biosensors in mechanobiology and mechanopharmacological screening. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:1299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.595497.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

54. Jagadevan, S, Banerjee, A, Banerjee, C, Guria, C, Tiwari, R, Baweja, M, et al.. Recent developments in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering in microalgae towards biofuel production. Biotechnol Biofuels 2018;11:185. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1181-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

55. Rupprecht, J. From systems biology to fuel--Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as a model for a systems biology approach to improve biohydrogen production. J Biotechnol 2009;142:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.02.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Zhang, Y-HP. Production of biofuels and biochemicals by in vitro synthetic biosystems: opportunities and challenges. Biotechnol Adv 2015;33:1467–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.009.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

57. Shi, T, Han, P, You, C, Zhang, Y-HPJ. An in vitro synthetic biology platform for emerging industrial biomanufacturing: bottom-up pathway design. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2018;3:186–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2018.05.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

58. Zhou, W, Šmidlehner, T, Jerala, R. Synthetic biology principles for the design of protein with novel structures and functions. FEBS Lett 2020;594:2199–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13796.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

59. Burrill, DR, Inniss, MC, Boyle, PM, Silver, PA. Synthetic memory circuits for tracking human cell fate. Genes Dev 2012;26:1486–97. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.189035.112.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

60. Friedland, AE, Lu, TK, Wang, X, Shi, D, Church, G, Collins, JJ. Synthetic gene networks that count. Science 2009;324:1199–202. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

61. Siuti, P, Yazbek, J, Lu, TK. Synthetic circuits integrating logic and memory in living cells. Nat Biotechnol 2013;31:448–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2510.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Healy, CP, Deans, TL. Genetic circuits to engineer tissues with alternative functions. J Biol Eng 2019;13:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-019-0170-7.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

63. Re, A. Synthetic gene expression circuits for designing precision tools in oncology. Front Cell Dev Biol 2017;5:77. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2017.00077.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

64. Kumar, RR, Prasad, S. Metabolic engineering of bacteria. Indian J Microbiol 2011;51:403–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0172-8.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

65. Lee, SY, Mattanovich, D, Villaverde, A. Systems metabolic engineering, industrial biotechnology and microbial cell factories. Microb Cell Factories 2012;11:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-156.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66. Salis, HM, Mirsky, EA, Voigt, CA. Automated design of synthetic ribosome binding sites to control protein expression. Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:946–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1568.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

67. Shetty, RP, Endy, D, Knight, TFJ. Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts. J Biol Eng 2008;2:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-1611-2-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

68. Mutalik, VK, Guimaraes, JC, Cambray, G, Lam, C, Christoffersen, MJ, Mai, Q-A, et al.. Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements. Nat Methods 2013;10:354–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2404.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

69. Schmidt, CM, Smolke, CD. RNA switches for synthetic biology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a032532.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

70. Mc Auley, MT, Choi, H, Mooney, K, Paul, E, Miller, VM. Systems biology and synthetic biology: a new epoch for toxicology research. Adv Toxicol 2015;2015:575403. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/575403.Suche in Google Scholar

71. DeBord, DG, Carreón, T, Lentz, TJ, Middendorf, PJ, Hoover, MD, Schulte, PA. Use of the “Exposome” in the practice of epidemiology: a primer on -Omic Technologies. Am J Epidemiol 2016;184:302–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv325.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

72. Sonawane, AR, Weiss, ST, Glass, K, Sharma, A. Network medicine in the age of biomedical big data. Front Genet 2019;10:294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00294.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

73. Kamada, T. System biomedicine: a new paradigm in biomedical engineering. Front Med Biol Eng 1992;4:1–2.Suche in Google Scholar

74. Goh, K-I, Cusick, ME, Valle, D, Childs, B, Vidal, M, Barabási, A-L. The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:8685–90. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701361104.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

75. Goh, K-I, Choi, I-G. Exploring the human diseasome: the human disease network. Brief Funct Genomics 2012;11:533–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/els032.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

76. Wang, K, Lee, I, Carlson, G, Hood, L, Galas, D. Systems biology and the discovery of diagnostic biomarkers. Dis Markers 2010;28:199–207. https://doi.org/10.3233/DMA-2010-069710.1155/2010/130861.Suche in Google Scholar

77. Generalov, E, Clarke, T, Iddamalgoda, L, Sundararajan, VS, Suravajhala, P, Goltsov, A. Chapter 3 – Systems biology in biomarker development for cancer signaling therapy. In: Jørgensen, JTBT-C, editor. Companion and complementary diagnostics. Academic Press; 2019:27–51 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-813539-6.00003-1Suche in Google Scholar

78. Alawieh, A, Zaraket, F, Li, J-L, Nokkari, A, Razafsha, M, Fadlallah, B, et al.. Systems biology, bioinformatics, and biomarkers in neuropsychiatry. Front Neurosci 2012;6:187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00187.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

79. Schaub, JA, Hamidi, H, Subramanian, L, Kretzler, M. Systems biology and kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020;15:695–703. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.09990819.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

80. Louridas, GE, Kanonidis, IE, Lourida, KG. Systems biology in heart diseases. Hippokratia 2010;14:10–6.Suche in Google Scholar

81. Mazein, A, Ostaszewski, M, Kuperstein, I, Watterson, S, Le Novère, N, Lefaudeux, D, et al.. Systems medicine disease maps: community-driven comprehensive representation of disease mechanisms. Npj Syst Biol Appl 2018;4:21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-018-0059-y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

82. Caliendo, F, Dukhinova, M, Siciliano, V. Engineered cell-based therapeutics: synthetic biology meets immunology. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019;7:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00043.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

83. Yildirim, MA, Goh, K-I, Cusick, ME, Barabási, A-L, Vidal, M. Drug-target network. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:1119–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1338.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

84. Keiser, MJ, Setola, V, Irwin, JJ, Laggner, C, Abbas, AI, Hufeisen, SJ, et al.. Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature 2009;462:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08506.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

85. Chang, RL, Xie, L, Xie, L, Bourne, PE, Palsson, BØ. Drug off-target effects predicted using structural analysis in the context of a metabolic network model. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1000938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000938.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

86. Kinnings, SL, Liu, N, Buchmeier, N, Tonge, PJ, Xie, L, Bourne, PE. Drug discovery using chemical systems biology: repositioning the safe medicine Comtan to treat multi-drug and extensively drug resistant tuberculosis. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5:e1000423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000423.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

87. Fitzgerald, JB, Schoeberl, B, Nielsen, UB, Sorger, PK. Systems biology and combination therapy in the quest for clinical efficacy. Nat Chem Biol 2006;2:458–66. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio817.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

88. Aderem, A, Adkins, JN, Ansong, C, Galagan, J, Kaiser, S, Korth, MJ, et al.. A systems biology approach to infectious disease research: innovating the pathogen-host research paradigm. mBio 2011;2:e00325–10. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00325-10.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

89. Sturla, SJ, Irwin, JJ, Loeppky, RN, Mulvihill, MJ, Searcey, M. Chemistry in cancer research: a vital partnership. Cancer Res 2007;67:6539–43. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1619.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Shruthi, BS, Vinodhkumar, P, Selvamani. Proteomics: a new perspective for cancer. Adv Biomed Res 2016;5:67. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.180636.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

91. Shankar, S, Pillai, MR. Translating cancer research by synthetic biology. Mol Biosyst 2011;7:1802–10. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1mb05016h.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2022-01-06

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Magnetic characterization of magnetoactive elastomers containing magnetic hard particles using first-order reversal curve analysis
  4. Microscopic understanding of particle-matrix interaction in magnetic hybrid materials by element-specific spectroscopy
  5. Biodeinking: an eco-friendly alternative for chemicals based recycled fiber processing
  6. Bio-based polyurethane aqueous dispersions
  7. Cellulose-based polymers
  8. Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites
  9. Natural substances in cancer—do they work?
  10. Personalized and targeted therapies
  11. Identification of potential histone deacetylase inhibitory biflavonoids from Garcinia kola (Guttiferae) using in silico protein-ligand interaction
  12. Chemical computational approaches for optimization of effective surfactants in enhanced oil recovery
  13. Social media and learning in an era of coronavirus among chemistry students in tertiary institutions in Rivers State
  14. Techniques for the detection and quantification of emerging contaminants
  15. Occurrence, fate, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in a diverse ecosystem
  16. Updates on the versatile quinoline heterocycles as anticancer agents
  17. Trends in microbial degradation and bioremediation of emerging contaminants
  18. Power to the city: Assessing the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in multiple cities of Ecuador
  19. Phytoremediation as an effective tool to handle emerging contaminants
  20. Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review
  21. Integrating multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment: a novel methodology for sustainable process design
  22. A conversation on the quartic equation of the secular determinant of methylenecyclopropene
  23. Recent developments in the synthesis and anti-cancer activity of acridine and xanthine-based molecules
  24. An overview of in silico methods used in the design of VEGFR-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents
  25. Fragment based drug design
  26. Advances in heterocycles as DNA intercalating cancer drugs
  27. Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines
  28. Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches
  29. Membrane technologies for sports supplementation
  30. Fused pyrrolo-pyridines and pyrrolo-(iso)quinoline as anticancer agents
  31. Membrane applications in the food industry
  32. Membrane techniques in the production of beverages
  33. Statistical methods for in silico tools used for risk assessment and toxicology
  34. Dicarbonyl compounds in the synthesis of heterocycles under green conditions
  35. Green synthesis of triazolo-nucleoside conjugates via azide–alkyne C–N bond formation
  36. Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances
  37. Survival is the driver for adaptation: safety engineering changed the future, security engineering prevented disasters and transition engineering navigates the pathway to the climate-safe future
https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2021-0102
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
biosensors; biofuels; metabolic engineering; modelling; synthetic biology; systems biology

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Magnetic characterization of magnetoactive elastomers containing magnetic hard particles using first-order reversal curve analysis
  4. Microscopic understanding of particle-matrix interaction in magnetic hybrid materials by element-specific spectroscopy
  5. Biodeinking: an eco-friendly alternative for chemicals based recycled fiber processing
  6. Bio-based polyurethane aqueous dispersions
  7. Cellulose-based polymers
  8. Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites
  9. Natural substances in cancer—do they work?
  10. Personalized and targeted therapies
  11. Identification of potential histone deacetylase inhibitory biflavonoids from Garcinia kola (Guttiferae) using in silico protein-ligand interaction
  12. Chemical computational approaches for optimization of effective surfactants in enhanced oil recovery
  13. Social media and learning in an era of coronavirus among chemistry students in tertiary institutions in Rivers State
  14. Techniques for the detection and quantification of emerging contaminants
  15. Occurrence, fate, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in a diverse ecosystem
  16. Updates on the versatile quinoline heterocycles as anticancer agents
  17. Trends in microbial degradation and bioremediation of emerging contaminants
  18. Power to the city: Assessing the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in multiple cities of Ecuador
  19. Phytoremediation as an effective tool to handle emerging contaminants
  20. Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review
  21. Integrating multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment: a novel methodology for sustainable process design
  22. A conversation on the quartic equation of the secular determinant of methylenecyclopropene
  23. Recent developments in the synthesis and anti-cancer activity of acridine and xanthine-based molecules
  24. An overview of in silico methods used in the design of VEGFR-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents
  25. Fragment based drug design
  26. Advances in heterocycles as DNA intercalating cancer drugs
  27. Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines
  28. Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches
  29. Membrane technologies for sports supplementation
  30. Fused pyrrolo-pyridines and pyrrolo-(iso)quinoline as anticancer agents
  31. Membrane applications in the food industry
  32. Membrane techniques in the production of beverages
  33. Statistical methods for in silico tools used for risk assessment and toxicology
  34. Dicarbonyl compounds in the synthesis of heterocycles under green conditions
  35. Green synthesis of triazolo-nucleoside conjugates via azide–alkyne C–N bond formation
  36. Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances
  37. Survival is the driver for adaptation: safety engineering changed the future, security engineering prevented disasters and transition engineering navigates the pathway to the climate-safe future
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 24.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2021-0102/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen