Abstract
Current trends in the food industry for the application of membrane techniques are presented. Industrial solutions as well as laboratory research, which can contribute to the improvement of membrane efficiency and performance in this field, are widely discussed. Special attention is given to the main food industries related to dairy, sugar and biotechnology. In addition, the potential of membrane techniques to assist in the treatment of waste sources arising from food production is highlighted.
Funding source: Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: This work was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Barclay, TG, Hegab, HM, Michelmore, A, Weeks, M, Ginic-Markovic, M. Multidentate polyzwitterion attachment to polydopamine modified ultrafiltration membranes for dairy processing: characterization, performance and durability. J Ind Eng Chem 2018;61:356–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.035.Suche in Google Scholar
2. Nakat, Z, Bou-Mitri, C. COVID-19 and the food industry: readiness assessment. Food Contr 2021;121:107661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107661.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Telukdarie, A, Munsamy, M, Mohlala, P. Analysis of the impact of COVID-19 on the food and beverages manufacturing sector. Sustainability 2020;12:9331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229331.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development. The 17 goals | Sustainable development. New York: United Nations; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Kennedy, E, Raiten, D, Finley, J. A view to the future: opportunities and challenges for food and nutrition sustainability. Curr Dev Nutr 2020;4. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa035.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Baroni, L, Filippin, D, Goggi, S. Helping the planet with healthy eating habits. Open Inf Sci 2018;2:156–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0012.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Hernández, K, Muro, C, Ortega, RE, Velazquez, S, Riera, F. Water recovery by treatment of food industry wastewater using membrane processes. Environ Technol 2021;42:775–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1645739.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Marchesi, CM, Paliga, M, Oro, CED, Dallago, RM, Zin, G, Di Luccio, M, et al.. Use of membranes for the treatment and reuse of water from the pre-cooling system of chicken carcasses. Environ Technol 2021;42:126–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1624834.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Bottino, A, Capannelli, G, Comite, A, Jezowska, A, Pagliero, M, Costa, C, et al.. Treatment of olive mill wastewater through integrated pressure-driven membrane processes. Membranes 2020;10:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10110334.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Zhang, Z, Huang, Z, Tong, J, Wu, Q, Pan, Y, Malakar, PK, et al.. An outlook for food sterilization technology: targeting the outer membrane of foodborne gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. Curr Opin Food Sci 2021;42:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2021.02.013.Suche in Google Scholar
11. Issaoui, M, Limousy, L. Low-cost ceramic membranes: synthesis, classifications, and applications. Compt Rendus Chem 2019;22:175–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2018.09.014.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Shahbandeh, M. Sugar industry. In: Sugar | Statista. New York: Statista; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Singh, R. Hybrid membrane systems – applications and case studies. Membr. Technol. Eng. Water Purif. Elsevier; 2015. p. 179–281.10.1016/B978-0-444-63362-0.00003-3Suche in Google Scholar
14. Hinkova, A, Bubník, Z, Kadlec, P, Pridal, J. Potentials of separation membranes in the sugar industry. Separ Purif Technol 2002;26:101–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00121-6.Suche in Google Scholar
15. Hanssens, TR, Van Nispen, JGM, Koerts, K, De Nie, LH. Ultrafiltration as an alternative for raw juice purification in the beet sugar industry. Zuckerindustrie 1984;109:152–6.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Mak, FK. Removal of colour impurities in raw sugar by ultrafiltration. Int Sugar J 1991;93:263–5.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Nene, S, Kaur, S, Sumod, K, Joshi, B, Raghavarao, KSMS. Membrane distillation for the concentration of raw cane-sugar syrup and membrane clarified sugarcane juice. Desalination 2002;147:157–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00604-5.Suche in Google Scholar
18. Castro-Muñoz, R, Boczkaj, G, Gontarek, E, Cassano, A, Fíla, V. Membrane technologies assisting plant-based and agro-food by-products processing: a comprehensive review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2020;95:219–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.003.Suche in Google Scholar
19. Akhtar, A, Subbiah, S, Mohanty, K, Sundar, R, Unnikrishnan, R, Hareesh, US. Sugarcane juice clarification by lanthanum phosphate nanofibril coated ceramic ultrafiltration membrane: PPO removal in absence of lime pre-treatment, fouling and cleaning studies. Separ Purif Technol 2020;249:117157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117157.Suche in Google Scholar
20. Luo, J, Hang, X, Zhai, W, Qi, B, Song, W, Chen, X, et al.. Refining sugarcane juice by an integrated membrane process: filtration behavior of polymeric membrane at high temperature. J Membr Sci 2016;509:105–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.053.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Bamaga, OA, Yokochi, A, Zabara, B, Babaqi, AS. Hybrid FO/RO desalination system: preliminary assessment of osmotic energy recovery and designs of new FO membrane module configurations. Desalination 2011;268:163–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.013.Suche in Google Scholar
22. Ricceri, F, Giagnorio, M, Zodrow, KR, Tiraferri, A. Organic fouling in forward osmosis: governing factors and a direct comparison with membrane filtration driven by hydraulic pressure. J Membr Sci 2021;619:118759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118759.Suche in Google Scholar
23. Teklu, H, Gautam, DK, Subbiah, S. Axial flow hollow fiber forward osmosis module analysis for optimum design and operating conditions in desalination applications. Chem Eng Sci 2020;216:115494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115494.Suche in Google Scholar
24. Akhtar, A, Singh, M, Subbiah, S, Mohanty, K. Sugarcane juice concentration using a novel aquaporin hollow fiber forward osmosis membrane. Food Bioprod Process 2021;126:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2021.01.007.Suche in Google Scholar
25. Garcia-Castello, EM, McCutcheon, JR, Elimelech, M. Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis. J Membr Sci 2009;338:61–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.011.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Akhtar, A, Singh, M, Subbiah, S, Mohanty, K. Modelling, experimental validation and process design of forward osmosis process for sugarcane juice concentration. LWT (Lebensm-Wiss & Technol) 2021;141:110852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110852.Suche in Google Scholar
27. Donovan, M, Hlavacek, M. Process for purification of low grade sugar syrups using nanofiltration. United States patent US6406546B1, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar
28. Donovan, M, Jansen, RP, Hlavacek, M, Walker, G, Williams, JC. Sugar beet membrane filtration process. United States patent US6406547B1, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Donovan, M, Jansen, RP, Reisig, RC, Hlavacek, M, Walker, G, Williams, JC. Sugar cane membrane filtration process. United States patent US6406548B1, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar
30. Malmali, M, Stickel, JJ, Wickramasinghe, SR. Sugar concentration and detoxification of clarified biomass hydrolysate by nanofiltration. Separ Purif Technol 2014;132:655–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.06.014.Suche in Google Scholar
31. Zhou, F, Wang, C, Wei, J. Separation of acetic acid from monosaccharides by NF and RO membranes: performance comparison. J Membr Sci 2013;429:243–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.043.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Ahsan, L, Jahan, MS, Ni, Y. Recovering/concentrating of hemicellulosic sugars and acetic acid by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis from prehydrolysis liquor of kraft based hardwood dissolving pulp process. Bioresour Technol 2014;155:111–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.096.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Ghazali, NF, Razak, NDA. Recovery of saccharides from lignocellulosic hydrolysates using nanofiltration membranes: a review. Food Bioprod Process 2021;126:215–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2021.01.006.Suche in Google Scholar
34. JIUWU HI-TECH Membrane Technology. Starch sugar membrane | China JIUWU. Jiangsu, China: JIUWU; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
35. Kulozik, U. Ultra- and Microfiltration in Dairy Technology. In: Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes, Membrane processes in the pharmaceutical and biotechnological field. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018:1–28 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-813606-5.00001-4Suche in Google Scholar
36. Buche, P, Dervaux, S, Leconte, N, Belna, M, Granger-Delacroix, M, Garnier-Lambrouin, F, et al.. Milk microfiltration process dataset annotated from a collection of scientific papers. Data Br 2021;36:107063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107063.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
37. National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment. Milk microfiltration. Paris: INRAE; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
38. Pretorius, C, Buys, EM. Extended shelf life milk processing: effect of simulated cleaning in place on the germination and attachment of Bacillus cereus spores. Int J Dairy Technol 2021;74:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0307.12744.Suche in Google Scholar
39. Skrzypek, M, Burger, M. Isoflux® ceramic membranes - practical experiences in dairy industry. Desalination 2010;250:1095–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.116.Suche in Google Scholar
40. SYNELCO LTD Technical and Commercial Company. Membran-tech (MF) | Synelco. Athens: Synelco; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
41. REDA Food Processing Plants. Microfiltration | Reda s.p.a. Isola Vicentina: Reda SPA; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
42. Eliquo Protec GmbH. Filtration systems - ELIQUO PROTEC. Grafenhausen: Eliquo Protec; 2021.Suche in Google Scholar
43. Rashidi, H, Mazaheri-Tehrani, M, Razavi, SMA, Ghods-Rohany, M. Improving textural and sensory characteristics of low-fat UF Feta cheese made with fat replacers J Agric Sci Technol 2015;17:121–32.Suche in Google Scholar
44. Zonoubi, R, Goli, M. The effect of complete replacing sodium with potassium, calcium, and magnesium brine on sodium-free ultrafiltration Feta cheese at the end of the 60-day ripening period: physicochemical, proteolysis–lipolysis indices, microbial, colorimetric, and sensory. Food Sci Nutr 2021;9:866–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2050.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
45. Jalilzadeh, A, Hesari, J, Peighambardoust, SH, Javidipour, I. The effect of ultrasound treatment on microbial and physicochemical properties of Iranian ultrafiltered feta-type cheese. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:5809–20. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-14352.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
46. Ribeiro, LR, Leite Júnior, BRDCL, Cristianini, M. Effect of high-pressure processing on the characteristics of cheese made from ultrafiltered milk: influence of the kind of rennet. Innovat Food Sci Emerg Technol 2018;50:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.10.012.Suche in Google Scholar
47. Mistry, VV, Maubois, J-L. Application of membrane separation technology to cheese production. In: Fox, PF, editor. Cheese: chemistry, physics and microbiology. Boston: Springer. 1993;493–522 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2650-6_13.Suche in Google Scholar
48. Ramachandra Rao, HG. Mechanisms of flux decline during ultrafiltration of dairy products and influence of pH on flux rates of whey and buttermilk. Desalination 2002;144:319–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00336-3.Suche in Google Scholar
49. Villeneuve, W, Bérubé, A, Chamberland, J, Pouliot, Y, Labrie, S, Doyen, A. Contribution of biofouling to permeation flux decline and membrane resistance changes during whey ultrafiltration. Int Dairy J 2021;117:105010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105010.Suche in Google Scholar
50. Rabiller-Baudry, M, Bégoin, L, Delaunay, D, Paugam, L, Chaufer, B. A dual approach of membrane cleaning based on physico-chemistry and hydrodynamics. Application to PES membrane of dairy industry. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 2008;47:267–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2007.01.026.Suche in Google Scholar
51. Rabiller-Baudry, M, Loulergue, P, Girard, J, El Mansour El Jastimi, M, Bouzin, A, Le Gallic, M, et al.. Consequences of membrane aging on real or misleading evaluation of membrane cleaning by flux measurements. Separ Purif Technol 2021;259:118044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118044.Suche in Google Scholar
52. Doudiès, F, Loginov, M, Hengl, N, Karrouch, M, Leconte, N, Garnier-Lambrouin, F, et al.. Build-up and relaxation of membrane fouling deposits produced during crossflow ultrafiltration of casein micelle dispersions at 12 and 42 °C probed by in situ SAXS. J Membr Sci 2021;618:118700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118700.Suche in Google Scholar
53. Loginov, M, Doudiès, F, Hengl, N, Karrouch, M, Leconte, N, Garnier-Lambrouin, F, et al.. On the reversibility of membrane fouling by deposits produced during crossflow ultrafiltration of casein micelle suspensions. J Membr Sci 2021;630:119289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119289.Suche in Google Scholar
54. Kujawa, J, Chrzanowska, E, Kujawski, W. Transport properties and fouling issues of membranes utilized for the concentration of dairy products by air-gap membrane distillation and microfiltration. Chem Pap 2019;73:565–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-018-0615-3.Suche in Google Scholar
55. Moejes, SN, van Boxtel, AJB. Energy saving potential of emerging technologies in milk powder production. Trends Food Sci Technol 2017;60:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.10.023.Suche in Google Scholar
56. Ladha-Sabur, A, Bakalis, S, Fryer, PJ, Lopez-Quiroga, E. Mapping energy consumption in food manufacturing. Trends Food Sci Technol 2019;86:270–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.034.Suche in Google Scholar
57. Hausmann, A, Sanciolo, P, Vasiljevic, T, Kulozik, U, Duke, M. Performance assessment of membrane distillation for skim milk and whey processing. J Dairy Sci 2014;97:56–71. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7044.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
58. Guo, S, Wan, Y, Chen, X, Luo, J. Loose nanofiltration membrane custom-tailored for resource recovery. Chem Eng J 2021;409:127376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127376.Suche in Google Scholar
59. Artemi, A, Chen, GQ, Kentish, SE, Lee, J. The relevance of critical flux concept in the concentration of skim milk using forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. J Membr Sci 2020;611:118357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118357.Suche in Google Scholar
60. Chen, GQ, Gras, SL, Kentish, SE. The application of forward osmosis to dairy processing. Separ Purif Technol 2020;246:116900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116900.Suche in Google Scholar
61. Artemi, A, Chen, GQ, Kentish, SE, Lee, J. Pilot scale concentration of cheese whey by forward osmosis: a short-cut method for evaluating the effective pressure driving force. Separ Purif Technol 2020;250:117263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117263.Suche in Google Scholar
62. Haupt, A, Lerch, A. Forward osmosis treatment of effluents from dairy and automobile industry - results from short-term experiments to show general applicability. Water Sci Technol 2018;78:467–75. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.278.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
63. Aydiner, C, Topcu, S, Tortop, C, Kuvvet, F, Ekinci, D, Dizge, N, et al.. A novel implementation of water recovery from whey: “forward- reverse osmosis” integrated membrane system. Desalin Water Treat 2013;51:786–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.693713.Suche in Google Scholar
64. ForwardOsmosisTech. Concentrating milk with forward osmosis. Wilmington: ForwardOsmosisTech; 2019.Suche in Google Scholar
65. Mohapatra, S, Mishra, SS, Bhalla, P, Thatoi, H. Engineering grass biomass for sustainable and enhanced bioethanol production. Planta 2019;250:395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00425-019-03218-Y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
66. Liu, CG, Xiao, Y, Xia, XX, Zhao, XQ, Peng, L, Srinophakun, P, et al.. Cellulosic ethanol production: progress, challenges and strategies for solutions. Biotechnol Adv 2019;37:491–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2019.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar
67. Robak, K, Balcerek, M. Current state-of-the-art in ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Microbiol Res 2020;240:126534. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICRES.2020.126534.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
68. Zhao, XQ, Zi, LH, Bai, FW, Lin, HL, Hao, XM, Yue, GJ, et al.. Bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2012;128:25–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2011_129.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
69. Xu, Z, Huang, F. Pretreatment methods for bioethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2014;174:43–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12010-014-1015-Y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
70. Kim, D. Physico-chemical conversion of lignocellulose: inhibitor effects and detoxification strategies: a mini review. Molecules 2018;23:309. https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES23020309.Suche in Google Scholar
71. Binod, P, Sindhu, R, Singhania, RR, Vikram, S, Devi, L, Nagalakshmi, S, et al.. Bioethanol production from rice straw: an overview. Bioresour Technol 2010;101:4767–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2009.10.079.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
72. Shigechi, H, Koh, J, Fujita, Y, Matsumoto, T, Bito, Y, Ueda, M, et al.. Direct production of ethanol from raw corn starch via fermentation by use of a novel surface-engineered yeast strain codisplaying glucoamylase and α-amylase. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:5037–40. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.8.5037-5040.2004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
73. Pavlečić, M, Rezić, T, Šantek, MI, Horvat, P, Šantek, B. Bioethanol production from raw sugar beet cossettes in horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 2017;40:1679–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00449-017-1823-X.Suche in Google Scholar
74. Bušić, A, Marđetko, N, Kundas, S, Morzak, G, Belskaya, H, Šantek, MI, et al.. Bioethanol production from renewable raw materials and its separation and purification: a review. Food Technol Biotechnol 2018;56:289. https://doi.org/10.17113/FTB.56.03.18.5546.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
75. Qi, B, Luo, J, Chen, X, Hang, X, Wan, Y. Separation of furfural from monosaccharides by nanofiltration. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:7111–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2011.04.041.Suche in Google Scholar
76. Liu, S, Amidon, TE, Wood, CD. Membrane filtration: concentration and purification of hydrolyzates from biomass. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 2008;2:121–34. https://doi.org/10.1166/JBMB.2008.303.Suche in Google Scholar
77. Sjöman, E, Mänttäri, M, Nyström, M, Koivikko, H, Heikkilä, H. Xylose recovery by nanofiltration from different hemicellulose hydrolyzate feeds. J Membr Sci 2008;1–2:268–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2007.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar
78. Weng, YH, Wei, HJ, Tsai, TY, Lin, TH, Wei, TY, Guo, GL, et al.. Separation of furans and carboxylic acids from sugars in dilute acid rice straw hydrolyzates by nanofiltration. Bioresour Technol 2010;101:4889–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2009.11.090.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
79. Nguyen, NDTN, Fargues, C, Guiga, W, Lameloise, M-L. Assessing nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for the detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. J Membr Sci 2015;487:40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2015.03.072.Suche in Google Scholar
80. Nguyen, DTNN, Lameloise, ML, Guiga, W, Lewandowski, R, Bouix, M, Fargues, C. Optimization and modeling of diananofiltration process for the detoxification of ligno-cellulosic hydrolysates - study at pre-industrial scale. J Membr Sci 2016;512:111–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2016.04.008.Suche in Google Scholar
81. Wang, T, Meng, Y, Qin, Y, Feng, W, Wang, C. Removal of furfural and HMF from monosaccharides by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J Energy Inst 2018;91:473–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOEI.2017.01.005.Suche in Google Scholar
82. Lyu, H, Chen, K, Yang, X, Younas, R, Zhu, X, Luo, G, et al.. Two-stage nanofiltration process for high-value chemical production from hydrolysates of lignocellulosic biomass through hydrothermal liquefaction. Separ Purif Technol 2015;147:276–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2015.04.032.Suche in Google Scholar
83. Li, Y, Qi, B, Wan, Y. Separation of monosaccharides from pretreatment inhibitors by nanofiltration in lignocellulosic hydrolysate: fouling mitigation by activated carbon adsorption. Biomass Bioenergy 2020;136:105527. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2020.105527.Suche in Google Scholar
84. Shibuya, M, Sasaki, K, Tanaka, Y, Yasukawa, M, Takahashi, T, Kondo, A, et al.. Development of combined nanofiltration and forward osmosis process for production of ethanol from pretreated rice straw. Bioresour Technol 2017;235:405–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.03.158.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
85. Qi, B, Luo, J, Chen, G, Chen, X, Wan, Y. Application of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration for recycling cellulase and concentrating glucose from enzymatic hydrolyzate of steam exploded wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 2012;104:466–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2011.10.049.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
86. Dey, P, Pal, P, Kevin, JD, Das, DB. Lignocellulosic bioethanol production: prospects of emerging membrane technologies to improve the process – a critical review. Rev Chem Eng 2020;36:333–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/REVCE-2018-0014.Suche in Google Scholar
87. Zhang, L, Wang, Y, Cheng, LH, Xu, X, Chen, H. Concentration of lignocellulosic hydrolyzates by solar membrane distillation. Bioresour Technol 2012;123:382–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.07.064.Suche in Google Scholar
88. Chen, J, Zhang, Y, Wang, Y, Ji, X, Zhang, L, Mi, X, et al.. Removal of inhibitors from lignocellulosic hydrolyzates by vacuum membrane distillation. Bioresour Technol 2013;144:680–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.07.021.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
89. Fan, Q, Li, S, Qin, P, Nazmul Karim, M, Tan, T. A PDMS membrane with high pervaporation performance for the separation of furfural and its potential in industrial application. Green Chem 2014;16:1262–73. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3GC41867G.Suche in Google Scholar
90. Qin, F, Li, S, Qin, P, Karim, MN, Tan, T. A PDMS membrane with high pervaporation performance for the separation of furfural and its potential in industrial application. Green Chem 2014;16:1262–73. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3GC41867G.Suche in Google Scholar
91. Ghosh, UK, Pradhan, NC, Adhikari, B. Pervaporative separation of furfural from aqueous solution using modified polyurethaneurea membrane. Desalination 2010;252:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2009.11.009.Suche in Google Scholar
92. Shan, H, Li, S, Zhang, X, Meng, F, Zhuang, Y, Si, Z, et al.. Molecular dynamics simulation and preparation of vinyl modified polydimethylsiloxane membrane for pervaporation recovery of furfural. Separ Purif Technol 2021;258:118006. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2020.118006.Suche in Google Scholar
93. Hu, S, Guan, Y, Cai, D, Li, S, Qin, P, Karim, MN, et al.. A novel method for furfural recovery via gas stripping assisted vapor permeation by a polydimethylsiloxane membrane. Sci Rep 2015;5:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09428.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
94. Amelio, A, Van der Bruggen, B, Lopresto, C, Verardi, A, Calabro, V, Luis, P. Pervaporation membrane reactors: biomass conversion into alcohols. In: Alberto, F, Alfredo, C, Angelo, B, editors. Membrane technologies for biorefining. Amsterdam: Woodhead Publishing. 2016;331–81 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100451-7.00014-1.Suche in Google Scholar
95. Peng, P, Lan, Y, Liang, L, Jia, K. Membranes for bioethanol production by pervaporation. Biotechnol Biofuels 2021;141:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13068-020-01857-Y.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
96. Conde-Mejía, C, Jiménez-Gutiérrez, A. Analysis of ethanol dehydration using membrane separation processes. Open Life Sci 2020;15:122–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/BIOL-2020-0013.Suche in Google Scholar
97. Kang, Q, Huybrechts, J, Van Der Bruggen, B, Baeyens, J, Tan, T, Dewil, R. Hydrophilic membranes to replace molecular sieves in dewatering the bio-ethanol/water azeotropic mixture. Separ Purif Technol 2014;136:144–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2014.09.009.Suche in Google Scholar
98. Amornraksa, S, Subsaipin, I, Simasatitkul, L, Assabumrungrat, S. Systematic design of separation process for bioethanol production from corn stover. BMC Chem Eng 2020;21:2:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/S42480-020-00033-1.Suche in Google Scholar
99. Lipnizki, F, Thuvander, J, Rudolph, G. Membrane processes and applications for biorefineries. Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes 2020;283–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816778-6.00013-8.Suche in Google Scholar
100. Wangpor, J, Prayoonyong, P, Sakdaronnarong, C, Sungpet, A, Jonglertjunya, W. Bioethanol production from cassava starch by enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation and ex-situ nanofiltration. Energy Procedia 2017;138:883–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYPRO.2017.10.116.Suche in Google Scholar
101. Cai, D, Zhang, T, Zheng, J, Chang, Z, Wang, Z, Qin, PY, et al.. Biobutanol from sweet sorghum bagasse hydrolysate by a hybrid pervaporation process. Bioresour Technol 2013;145:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.02.094.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
102. Xue, C, Zhao, J, Chen, L, Yang, ST, Bai, F. Recent advances and state-of-the-art strategies in strain and process engineering for biobutanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Adv 2017;35:310–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.01.007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
103. Algayyim, SJ, Wandel, AP, Yusaf, T, Hamawand, I. Production and application of ABE as a biofuel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;82:1195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.082.Suche in Google Scholar
104. Li, Y, Tang, W, Chen, Y, Liu, J, Chia-fon, FL. Potential of acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) as a biofuel. Fuel 2019;242:673–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.063.Suche in Google Scholar
105. Gu, Y, Jiang, Y, Wu, H, Liu, X, Li, Z, Li, J, et al.. Economical challenges to microbial producers of butanol: feedstock, butanol ratio and titer. Biotechnol J 2011;6:1348–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100046.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
106. Green, E. Fermentative production of butanol—the industrial perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2011;22:337–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.02.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
107. Dong, Z, Liu, G, Liu, S, Liu, Z, Jin, W. High performance ceramic hollow fiber supported PDMS composite pervaporation membrane for bio-butanol recovery. J Membr Sci 2014;450:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2013.08.039.Suche in Google Scholar
108. Liu, D, Liu, G, Meng, L, Dong, Z, Huang, K, Jin, W. Hollow fiber modules with ceramic-supported PDMS composite membranes for pervaporation recovery of bio-butanol. Separ Purif Technol 2015;146:24–32.10.1016/j.seppur.2015.03.029Suche in Google Scholar
109. Chen, C, Xiao, Z, Tang, X, Cui, H, Zhang, J, Li, W, et al.. Acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation in a continuous and closed-circulating fermentation system with PDMS membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 2013;128:246–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.10.077.Suche in Google Scholar
110. Li, J, Chen, X, Qi, B, Luo, J, Zhuang, X, Su, Y, et al.. Continuous acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation with in situ solvent recovery by silicalite-1 filled PDMS/PAN composite membrane. Energy Fuels 2013;28:555–62. https://doi.org/10.1021/EF401706K.Suche in Google Scholar
111. Xue, C, Liu, F, Xu, M, Zhao, J, Chen, L, Ren, J, et al.. A novel in situ gas stripping-pervaporation process integrated with acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation for hyper n-butanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng 2016;113:120–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/BIT.25666.Suche in Google Scholar
112. Knozowska, K, Kujawska, A, Li, G, Kujawa, J, Bryjak, M, Kujawski, W, et al.. Membrane assisted processing of acetone, butanol, and ethanol (ABE) aqueous streams. Chem Eng Process - Process Intensif 2021;166:108462. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEP.2021.108462.Suche in Google Scholar
113. Handojo, L, Wardani, AK, Regina, D, Bella, C, Kresnowati, MTAP, Wenten, IG. Electro-membrane processes for organic acid recovery. RSC Adv 2019;9:7854–69. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA09227C.Suche in Google Scholar
114. Huang, C, Xu, T, Zhang, Y, Xue, Y, Chen, G. Application of electrodialysis to the production of organic acids: state-of-the-art and recent developments. J Membr Sci 2007;288:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2006.11.026.Suche in Google Scholar
115. Sun, X, Lu, H, Wang, J. Recovery of citric acid from fermented liquid by bipolar membrane electrodialysis. J Clean Prod 2017;143:250–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.12.118.Suche in Google Scholar
116. Pinacci, P, Radaelli, M. Recovery of citric acid from fermentation broths by electrodialysis with bipolar membranes. Desalination 2002;148:177–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00674-4.Suche in Google Scholar
117. Bélafi-Bakó, K, Molnár, E, Csanádi, Z, Nemestóthy, N. Comparative study on electrodialysis systems for galacturonic acid recovery. Hungar J Ind Chem 2012;40:65–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/343.Suche in Google Scholar
118. Lei, C, Li, Z, Gao, Q, Fu, R, Wang, W, Li, Q, et al.. Comparative study on the production of gluconic acid by electrodialysis and bipolar membrane electrodialysis: effects of cell configurations. J Membr Sci 2020;608:118192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2020.118192.Suche in Google Scholar
119. Timbuntam, W, Sriroth, K, Piyachomkwan, K, Tokiwa, Y. Application of bipolar electrodialysis on recovery of free lactic acid after simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cassava starch. Biotechnol Lett 2008;30:1747–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10529-008-9771-9.Suche in Google Scholar
120. Lameloise, ML, Lewandowski, R. Recovering l-malic acid from a beverage industry waste water: experimental study of the conversion stage using bipolar membrane electrodialysis. J Membr Sci 2012;403–404:196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2012.02.053.Suche in Google Scholar
121. Fu, L, Gao, X, Yang, Y, Aiyong, F, Hao, H, Gao, C. Preparation of succinic acid using bipolar membrane electrodialysis. Separ Purif Technol 2014;127:212–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2014.02.028.Suche in Google Scholar
122. Fuoco, C, Rizzi, R, Biondo, A, Longa, E, Mascaro, A, Shapira‐Schweitzer, K, et al.. In vivo generation of a mature and functional artificial skeletal muscle. EMBO Mol Med 2015;7:411–22. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201404062.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
123. Liu, X, Li, Q, Jiang, C, Lin, X, Xu, T. Bipolar membrane electrodialysis in aqua–ethanol medium: production of salicylic acid. J Membr Sci 2015;482:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2015.02.030.Suche in Google Scholar
124. Rottiers, T, Van der Bruggen, B, Pinoy, L. Production of salicylic acid in a three compartment bipolar membrane electrodialysis configuration. J Ind Eng Chem 2017;54:190–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIEC.2017.05.033.Suche in Google Scholar
125. Wang, Y, Zhang, X, Xu, T. Integration of conventional electrodialysis and electrodialysis with bipolar membranes for production of organic acids. J Membr Sci 2010;365:294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2010.09.018.Suche in Google Scholar
126. Wang, X, Wang, Y, Zhang, X, Xu, T. In situ combination of fermentation and electrodialysis with bipolar membranes for the production of lactic acid: operational compatibility and uniformity. Bioresour Technol 2012;125:165–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2012.08.125.Suche in Google Scholar
127. Wang, X, Wang, Y, Zhang, X, Feng, H, Xu, T. In-situ combination of fermentation and electrodialysis with bipolar membranes for the production of lactic acid: continuous operation. Bioresour Technol 2013;147:442–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2013.08.045.Suche in Google Scholar
128. Jiang, C, Zhang, Y, Feng, H, Wang, Q, Wang, Y, Xu, T. Simultaneous CO2 capture and amino acid production using bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BMED). J Membr Sci 2017;542:264–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2017.08.004.Suche in Google Scholar
129. Lin, X, Pan, J, Zhou, M, Xu, Y, Lin, J, Shen, J, et al.. Extraction of amphoteric amino acid by bipolar membrane electrodialysis: methionine acid as a case study. Ind Eng Chem Res 2016;55:2813–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.IECR.6B00116.Suche in Google Scholar
130. Eliseev, TV, Krisilova, EV, Shaposhnik, VA, Bukhovets, AE. Recovery and concentration of basic amino acids by electrodialysis with bipolar membranes. New Pub Balaban 2012;14:196–200. https://doi.org/10.5004/DWT.2010.1028.Suche in Google Scholar
131. Kattan Readi, OM, Kuenen, HJ, Zwijnenberg, HJ, Nijmeijer, K. Novel membrane concept for internal pH control in electrodialysis of amino acids using a segmented bipolar membrane (sBPM). J Membr Sci 2013;443:219–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2013.04.045.Suche in Google Scholar
132. Readi, OMK, Rolevink, E, Nijmeijer, K. Mixed matrix membranes for process intensification in electrodialysis of amino acids. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2014;89:425–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCTB.4135.Suche in Google Scholar
133. Firdaous, L, Dhulster, P, Amiot, J, Doyen, A, Lutin, F, Vézina, LP, et al.. Investigation of the large-scale bioseparation of an antihypertensive peptide from alfalfa white protein hydrolysate by an electromembrane process. J Membr Sci 2010;355:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEMSCI.2010.03.018.Suche in Google Scholar
134. Thibodeau, J, Benoit, N, Perreault, V, Bazinet, L. Scale-up and long-term study of electrodialysis with ultrafiltration membrane for the separation of a herring milt hydrolysate. Membranes 2021;11:558. https://doi.org/10.3390/MEMBRANES11080558.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
135. Readi, OMK, Rolevink, E, Nijmeijer, K. Mixed matrix membranes for process intensification in electrodialysis of amino acids. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2014;89:425–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCTB.4135.Suche in Google Scholar
136. Readi, OMK, Gironès, M, Wiratha, W, Nijmeijer, K. On the isolation of single basic amino acids with electrodialysis for the production of biobased chemicals. Ind Eng Chem Res 2012;52:1069–78. https://doi.org/10.1021/IE202634V.Suche in Google Scholar
137. Bazinet, L, Doyen, A, Roblet, C. Electrodialytic phenomena, associated electromembrane technologies and applications in the food, beverage and nutraceutical industries. In: Rizvi, SSH, editor. Woodhead Publishing Series in food science, technology and nutrition, separation, extraction and concentration processes in the food, beverage and nutraceutical industries. Amsterdam: Woodhead Publishing. 2013;202–18 p. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090751.1.202.Suche in Google Scholar
138. Mondor, M. Chapter 1. Production of value-added soy protein products by membrane-based operations. In: Alfredo, C, Enrico, D, editors. Integrated membrane operations: in the food production. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 2021;3–46 p. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110712711-001/PDF.Suche in Google Scholar
139. Jiang, C, Wang, Y, Xu, T. Membranes for the recovery of organic acids from fermentation broths. In: Alberto, F, Alfredo, C, Angelo, B, editors. Membrane technologies for biorefining. Amsterdam: Woodhead Publishing. 2016;135–61 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100451-7.00006-2.Suche in Google Scholar
140. Akgemci, EG, Ersöz, M, Atalay, T. Transport of formic acid through anion exchange membranes by diffusion dialysis and electro‐electro dialysis. Separ Sci Technol 2010;39:165–84. https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-120027407.Suche in Google Scholar
141. Liu, G, Wu, D, Chen, G, Halim, R, Liu, J, Deng, H. Comparative study on tartaric acid production by two-chamber and three-chamber electro-electrodialysis. Separ Purif Technol 2021;263:118403. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2021.118403.Suche in Google Scholar
142. Yi, SS, Lu, YC, Luo, GS. Separation and concentration of lactic acid by electro-electrodialysis. Separ Purif Technol 2008;60:308–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2007.09.004.Suche in Google Scholar
143. Luo, GS, Shan, XY, Qi, X, Lu, YC. Two-phase electro-electrodialysis for recovery and concentration of citric acid. Separ Purif Technol 2004;38:265–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2003.12.002.Suche in Google Scholar
144. Koter, S. Separation of weak and strong acids by electro-electrodialysis—experiment and theory. Separ Purif Technol 2008;60:251–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2007.08.017.Suche in Google Scholar
145. Alvarado, L, Chen, A. Electrodeionization: principles, strategies and applications. Electrochim Acta 2014;132:583–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ELECTACTA.2014.03.165.Suche in Google Scholar
146. Bazinet, L, Geoffroy, TR. Electrodialytic processes: market overview, membrane phenomena, recent developments and sustainable strategies. Membranes 2020;10:221. https://doi.org/10.3390/MEMBRANES10090221.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
147. Handojo, L, Wardani, AK, Regina, D, Bella, C, Kresnowati, MTAP, Wenten, IG. Electro-membrane processes for organic acid recovery. RSC Adv 2019;9:7854–69. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA09227C.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
148. Tongwen, X, Weihua, Y. Effect of cell configurations on the performance of citric acid production by a bipolar membrane electrodialysis. J Membr Sci 2002;203:145–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00795-5.Suche in Google Scholar
149. Tongwen, X, Weihua, Y. Citric acid production by electrodialysis with bipolar membranes. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 2002;41:519–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(01)00175-1.Suche in Google Scholar
150. Widiasa, IN, Sutrisna, PD, Wenten, IG. Performance of a novel electrodeionization technique during citric acid recovery. Separ Purif Technol 2004;39:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2003.12.020.Suche in Google Scholar
151. Qin, Y, Sheth, JP, Sirkar*, KK. Pervaporation membranes that are highly selective for acetic acid over water. Ind Eng Chem Res 2003;42:582–95. https://doi.org/10.1021/IE020414W.Suche in Google Scholar
152. Servel, C, Roizard, D, Favre, E, Horbez, D. Improved energy efficiency of a hybrid pervaporation/distillation process for acetic acid production: identification of target membrane performances by simulation. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014;53:7768–79. https://doi.org/10.1021/IE500467K/SUPPL_FILE/IE500467K_SI_001.PDF.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Magnetic characterization of magnetoactive elastomers containing magnetic hard particles using first-order reversal curve analysis
- Microscopic understanding of particle-matrix interaction in magnetic hybrid materials by element-specific spectroscopy
- Biodeinking: an eco-friendly alternative for chemicals based recycled fiber processing
- Bio-based polyurethane aqueous dispersions
- Cellulose-based polymers
- Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites
- Natural substances in cancer—do they work?
- Personalized and targeted therapies
- Identification of potential histone deacetylase inhibitory biflavonoids from Garcinia kola (Guttiferae) using in silico protein-ligand interaction
- Chemical computational approaches for optimization of effective surfactants in enhanced oil recovery
- Social media and learning in an era of coronavirus among chemistry students in tertiary institutions in Rivers State
- Techniques for the detection and quantification of emerging contaminants
- Occurrence, fate, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in a diverse ecosystem
- Updates on the versatile quinoline heterocycles as anticancer agents
- Trends in microbial degradation and bioremediation of emerging contaminants
- Power to the city: Assessing the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in multiple cities of Ecuador
- Phytoremediation as an effective tool to handle emerging contaminants
- Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review
- Integrating multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment: a novel methodology for sustainable process design
- A conversation on the quartic equation of the secular determinant of methylenecyclopropene
- Recent developments in the synthesis and anti-cancer activity of acridine and xanthine-based molecules
- An overview of in silico methods used in the design of VEGFR-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents
- Fragment based drug design
- Advances in heterocycles as DNA intercalating cancer drugs
- Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines
- Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches
- Membrane technologies for sports supplementation
- Fused pyrrolo-pyridines and pyrrolo-(iso)quinoline as anticancer agents
- Membrane applications in the food industry
- Membrane techniques in the production of beverages
- Statistical methods for in silico tools used for risk assessment and toxicology
- Dicarbonyl compounds in the synthesis of heterocycles under green conditions
- Green synthesis of triazolo-nucleoside conjugates via azide–alkyne C–N bond formation
- Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances
- Survival is the driver for adaptation: safety engineering changed the future, security engineering prevented disasters and transition engineering navigates the pathway to the climate-safe future
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Reviews
- Magnetic characterization of magnetoactive elastomers containing magnetic hard particles using first-order reversal curve analysis
- Microscopic understanding of particle-matrix interaction in magnetic hybrid materials by element-specific spectroscopy
- Biodeinking: an eco-friendly alternative for chemicals based recycled fiber processing
- Bio-based polyurethane aqueous dispersions
- Cellulose-based polymers
- Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites
- Natural substances in cancer—do they work?
- Personalized and targeted therapies
- Identification of potential histone deacetylase inhibitory biflavonoids from Garcinia kola (Guttiferae) using in silico protein-ligand interaction
- Chemical computational approaches for optimization of effective surfactants in enhanced oil recovery
- Social media and learning in an era of coronavirus among chemistry students in tertiary institutions in Rivers State
- Techniques for the detection and quantification of emerging contaminants
- Occurrence, fate, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in a diverse ecosystem
- Updates on the versatile quinoline heterocycles as anticancer agents
- Trends in microbial degradation and bioremediation of emerging contaminants
- Power to the city: Assessing the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in multiple cities of Ecuador
- Phytoremediation as an effective tool to handle emerging contaminants
- Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review
- Integrating multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment: a novel methodology for sustainable process design
- A conversation on the quartic equation of the secular determinant of methylenecyclopropene
- Recent developments in the synthesis and anti-cancer activity of acridine and xanthine-based molecules
- An overview of in silico methods used in the design of VEGFR-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents
- Fragment based drug design
- Advances in heterocycles as DNA intercalating cancer drugs
- Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines
- Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches
- Membrane technologies for sports supplementation
- Fused pyrrolo-pyridines and pyrrolo-(iso)quinoline as anticancer agents
- Membrane applications in the food industry
- Membrane techniques in the production of beverages
- Statistical methods for in silico tools used for risk assessment and toxicology
- Dicarbonyl compounds in the synthesis of heterocycles under green conditions
- Green synthesis of triazolo-nucleoside conjugates via azide–alkyne C–N bond formation
- Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances
- Survival is the driver for adaptation: safety engineering changed the future, security engineering prevented disasters and transition engineering navigates the pathway to the climate-safe future