Startseite Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches

  • Dinesh Kumar ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Pooja Sharma , Ayush Mahajan , Ravi Dhawan und Kamal Dua
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. Januar 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The virtual environment within the computer using software performed on the computer is known as in-silico studies. These drugs designing software play a vital task in discovering new drugs in the field of pharmaceuticals. These designing programs and software are employed in gene sequencing, molecular modeling, and in assessing the three-dimensional structure of the molecule, which can further be used in drug designing and development. Drug development and discovery is not only a powerful, extensive, and an interdisciplinary system but also a very complex and time-consuming method. This book chapter mainly focused on different types of in-silico approaches along with their pharmaceutical applications in numerous diseases.


Corresponding author: Dinesh Kumar, Sri Sai College of Pharmacy, Manawala, Amritsar 143001, Punjab, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Vice-chancellor of Punjabi University Patiala, India for their encouragement. The authors are also thankful to Er. S. K. Punj, Chairman, Sri Sai Group of Institutes and Smt. Tripta Punj, Managing Director, Sri Sai Group of Institutes for their constant moral support.

  1. Author Contributions: Conceptualization and methodology-DK, PS and AM; writing-original draft preparation, Ravi Dhawan RD and Kamal Dua KD software, data curation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision-DK and RD; project administration-DK, RD, and KD. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Salo-Ahen, OMH, Alanko, I, Bhadane, R, Bonvin, AMJJ, Honorato, RV, Hossain, S, et al.. Molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery and pharmaceutical development. Processes 2021;9:71–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9010071.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Park, DS, Kim, JM, Lee, YB, Ahn, CH. QSID Tool: a new three-dimensional QSAR environmental tool. J Comput Aided Drug Des 2008;22:873–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9219-2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. McGregor, MJ, Muskal, SM. Pharmacophore finger printing: application to QSAR and focused library design. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1999;39:569–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci980159j.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Macalino, SJ, Gosu, V, Hong, S, Choi, S. Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery. Arch Pharm Res 2015;38:1686–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Wang, T, Wu, MB, Lin, JP, Yang, LR. Quantitative structure-activity relationship: promising advances in drug discovery platforms. Expet Opin Drug Discov 2015;10:1283–300. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1083006.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Geromichalos, GD. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development. J BUON 2007;12:101–18.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Yang, SY. Pharmacophore modeling and applications in drug discovery: challenges and recent advances. Drug Discov Today 2010;15:444–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2010.03.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Joseph-McCarthy, D, Baber, JC, Feyfant, E, Thompson, DC, Humblet, C. Lead optimization via high-throughput molecular docking. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 2007;10:264–74.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Waterhouse, A, Bertoni, M, Bienert, S, Studer, G, Tauriello, G, Gumienny, R, et al.. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky427.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Luther, KB, Haltiwanger, RS. Role of unusual O-glycans in intercellular signalling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2009;41:1011–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2008.10.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Cohen, NC. Structure-based drug design and the discovery of aliskiren (Tekturna): perseverance and creativity to overcome a R&D pipeline challenge. Chem Biol Drug Des 2007;70:557–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00599.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Hellmuth, K, Grosskopf, S, Lum, CT, Wurtele, M, Roder, N, Von Kries, JP, et al.. Specific inhibitors of the protein tyrosine phosphatase Shp2 identified by high-throughput docking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:7275–80. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710468105.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Cozza, G, Gianoncelli, A, Montopoli, M, Laura, C, Venerando, A, Meggio, F, et al.. Identification of novel protein kinase CK1 delta (CK1δ) inhibitors through structure-based virtual screening. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2008;18:5672–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.08.072.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Claudio, NC. Discovery of novel chemotypes to a G-protein-coupled receptor through ligand-steered homology modeling and structure-based virtual screening. J Med Chem 2008;51:581–8.10.1021/jm070759mSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Park, H, Hwang, KY, Kim, YH, Hwan, K, Lee, JY, Kim, K. Discovery and biological evaluation of novel alpha-glucosidase inhibitors with in vivo antidiabetic effect. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2008;18:3711–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.05.056.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Clem, B, Telang, S, Clem, A, Yalcin, A, Meier, J, Simmons, A, et al.. Small-molecule inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase activity suppresses glycolytic flux and tumor growth. Mol Cancer Therapeut 2008;7:110–20. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-07-0482.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Park, H, Bahn, YJ, Jung, SH, Jeong, DG, Lee, SH, Seo, I, et al.. Discovery of novel Cdc25 phosphatase inhibitors with micromolar activity based on the structure based virtual screening. J Med Chem 2008;51:5533–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm701157g.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Song, L, Kalyanaraman, C, Fedorov, A, Fedorov, EV, Glasner, ME, Brown, S, et al.. Prediction and assignment of function for a divergent N-succinyl amino acid racemase. Nat Chem Biol 2007;3:486–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2007.11.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Sun, W, Gerth, C, Maeda, A, Lodowski, DT, Van Der Kraak, L, Saperstein, DA, et al.. Novel RDH12 mutations associated with Leber congenital amaurosis and cone-rod dystrophy: biochemical and clinical evaluations. Vis Res 2007;47:2055–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.005.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Autin, L, Steen, M, Dahlback, B, Villoutreix, BO. Proposed structural models of the prothrombinase (FXa-FVa) complex. Proteins 2006;63:440–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20848.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Navarrete, F, Garcia-Gutierrez, MS, Gasparyan, A, Austrich-Olivares, A, Manzanares, J. Role of cannabidiol in the therapeutic intervention for substance use disorders. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:626010. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.626010.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Gagnidze, K, Rozenfeld, R, Mezei, M, Zhou, MM, Devi, LA. Homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis to identify selective inhibitors of endothelin-converting enzyme-2. J Med Chem 2008;51:3378–87. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm7015478.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Proell, M, Riedl, SJ, Fritz, JH, Rojas, AM, Schwarzenbacher, R. The nod-like receptor (NLR) family: a tale of similarities and differences. PLoS One 2008;3:2119–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002119.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Guimaraes, AJ, Hamilton, AJ, Guedes, HL, Nosanchuk, JD, Zancope-Oliveira, RM. Biological function and molecular mapping of M antigen in yeast phase of histoplasma capsulatum. PLoS One 2008;3:3449–57. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003449.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Salomone-Stagni, M, Zambelli, B, Musiani, F, Ciurli, S. A model-based proposal for the role of UreF as a GTPase-activating protein in the urease active site biosynthesis. Proteins 2007;68:749–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21472.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Mueckler, M, Thorens, B. The SLC2 (GLUT) family of membrane transporters. Mol Aspect Med 2013;34:121–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mam.2012.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Landau, M, Herz, K, Padan, E, Ben-Tal, N. Model structure of the Na+/H+ exchanger 1 (NHE1): functional and clinical implications. J Biol Chem 2007;282:37854–63. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m705460200.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Nguyen, TL, Gussio, R, Smith, JA, Lannigan, DA, Hecht, SM, Scudiero, DA, et al.. Homology model of RSK2 N-terminal kinase domain, structure-based identification of novel RSK2 inhibitors, and preliminary common pharmacophore. Bioorg Med Chem 2006;14:6097–7105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2006.05.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Shoichet, BK, McGovern, SL, Wei, B, Irwin, JJ. Lead discovery using molecular docking. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2002;6:439–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1367-5931(02)00339-3.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Kumar, D, Jain, SK. A comprehensive review of N-heterocycles as cytotoxic agents. Curr Med Chem 2016;23:4338–94. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867323666160809093930.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Sharma, P, Sharma, R, Rao, HS, Kumar, D. Phytochemistry and medicinal attributes of A. Scholaris: a review. Int J Pharmaceut Sci Res 2015;6:505–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2014.11.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Kumar, D, Sharma, P, Singh, H, Nepali, K, Gupta, GK, Jain, SK, et al.. The value of pyrans as anticancer scaffolds in medicinal chemistry. RSC Adv 2017;7:36977–99. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra05441f.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Kaur, T, Sharma, P, Gupta, G, Ntie-Kang, F, Kumar, D. Treatment of tuberculosis by natural drugs: a review. Plant Arch 2019;19:2168–76.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Kumar, D, Singh, G, Sharma, P, Qayum, A, Mahajan, G, Mintoo, MJ, et al.. 4-aryl/heteroaryl-4H-fused pyrans as anti-proliferative agents: design, synthesis and biological evaluation. Anti Cancer Agents Med Chem 2018;18:57–73. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520617666170918143911.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Sharma, P, Shri, R, Ntie-Kang, F, Kumar, S. Phytochemical and ethnopharmacological perspectives of Ehretia laevis. Molecules 2021;26:3489. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26123489.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Hussain, H, Krohn, K, Uddin, VU, Miana, GA, Greend, IR. Lapachol: an overview. Arkivoc 2007;2:145–71. https://doi.org/10.3998/ark.5550190.0008.204.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Kumar, PP, Siva, B, Rao, BV, Dileep Kumar, G, Lakshma Nayak, V, Nishant Jain, S, et al.. Synthesis and biological evaluation of bergenin-1,2,3-triazole hybrids as novel class of anti-mitotic agents. Bioorg Chem 2019;91:103161–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.103161.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Kaur, R, Sharma, P, Gupta, GK, Ntie-Kang, F, Kumar, D. Structure activity relationship and mechanistic insights for anti-HIV natural products. Molecules 2020;25:1–49. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092070.Suche in Google Scholar

39. Kumar, D, Sharma, P, Shabu Kaur, R, Lobe, MMM, Gupta, GK, Ntie-Kang, F. In search of therapeutic candidates for HIV/AIDS: rational approaches, design strategies, structure–activity relationship and mechanistic insights. RSC Adv 2021;11:17936–64. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra10655k.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Pawar, R, Das, T, Mishra, S, Nutan Pancholi, B, Gupta, SK, Bhat, SV. Synthesis, anti-HIV activity, integrase enzyme inhibition and molecular modeling of cetchol, hydroquinone and quinol labdane analogs. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2014;24:302–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.11.014.Suche in Google Scholar

41. Regine, S, Bohacek, Colin, MM, Wayne, CG. The art and practice of structure-based drug design: a molecular modeling perspective. Med Res Rev 1996;16:3–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(199601)16:1<3::AID-MED1>3.0.CO;2-6.10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(199601)16:1<3::AID-MED1>3.0.CO;2-6Suche in Google Scholar

42. Biagini, GA, Fisher, N, Shone, AE, Mubaraki, MA, Srivastava, A, Hill, A, et al.. Generation of quinolone antimalarials targeting the Plasmodium falciparum mitochondrial respiratory chain for the treatment and prophylaxis of malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:8298–303. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205651109.Suche in Google Scholar

43. Spadaro, A, Negri, M, Marchais-Oberwinkler, S, Bey, E, Frotscher, M. Hydroxybenzothiazoles as new nonsteroidal inhibitors of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (17β-HSD1). PLoS One 2012;7:292–302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029252.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Lin, X, Huang, XP, Chen, G, Whaley, R, Peng, S, Wang, Y, et al.. Life beyond kinases: structure-based discovery of sorafenib as nanomolar antagonist of 5-HT receptors. J Med Chem 2012;55:5749–59. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm300338m.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Xing, L, McDonald, JJ, Kolodziej, SA, Kurumbail, RG, Williams, JM, Warren, CJ, et al.. Discovery of potent inhibitors of soluble epoxide hydrolase by combinatorial library design and structure-based virtual screening. J Med Chem 2011;54:1211–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm101382t.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Lavecchia, A, Giovanni, C, Pesapane, A, Montuori, N, Ragno, P, Martucci, NM, et al.. Discovery of new inhibitors of Cdc25B dual specificity phosphatases by structure-based virtual screening. J Med Chem 2012;55:4142–58. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm201624h.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Caporuscio, F, Rastelli, G, Imbriano, C, Del, RA. Structure-based design of potent aromatase inhibitors by high-throughput docking. J Med Chem 2011;54:4006–17. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm2000689.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Birgit, W, Katja, W, Julia, B, Markt, P, Noha, SM, Wolber, G, et al.. Pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening for novel acidic inhibitors of microsomal prostaglandin E2 synthase-1 (mPGES-1). J Med Chem 2011;54:3163–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm101309g.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

49. Stephane, DC, Sebastien, DE, Eric, T, Levan, D, Cueto, M, Schmidt, R, et al.. Virtual screening and computational optimization for the discovery of covalent prolyl oligopeptidase inhibitors with activity in human cells. J Med Chem 2012;55:6306–15. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm3002839.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

50. Sager, G, Orvoll, EO, Lysaa, RA, Kufareva, I, Abagyan, R, Ravna, AW. Novel cGMP efflux inhibitors identified by virtual ligand screening (VLS) and confirmed by experimental studies. J Med Chem 2012;55:3049–57. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm2014666.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

51. Lavecchia, A, Cerchia, C. In silico methods to address polypharmacology: current status, applications and future perspectives. Drug Discov Today 2016;21:288–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.12.007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Suh, ME, Park, SY, Lee, HJ. Comparison of QSAR methods (CoMFA, CoMSIA, HQSAR) of anticancer 1-N-substituted imidazoquinoline-4,9-dione derivatives. Bull Kor Chem Soc 2002;23:417–22. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2002.23.3.417.Suche in Google Scholar

53. Kurogi, Y, Guner, OF. Pharmacophore modeling and three-dimensional database searching for drug design using catalyst. Curr Med Chem 2001;8:1035–55. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867013372481.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Wade, RC, Salo-Ahen, O. Molecular modeling in drug design. Molecules 2019;24:321–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24020321.Suche in Google Scholar

55. Xiao-Qiang, D, Hui-Yuan, W, Ying-Lan, Z, Xiang, ML, Jiang, PD, Cao, ZX, et al.. Pharmacophore modelling and virtual screening for identification of new aurora-A kinase inhibitors. Chem Biol Drug Des 2008;71:533–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0285.2008.00663.x.Suche in Google Scholar

56. Xie, HZ, Lin, LL, Xia, J, Zou, J, Yang, L, Wei, YQ, et al.. Pharmacophore modeling study based on known Spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors together with virtual screening for identifying novel inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2009;19:1944–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.02.049.Suche in Google Scholar

57. Ji-Xia, R, Lin, LL, Zou, LY, Jin-Liang, Y, Sheng-Yong, Y. Pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening for the discovery of new transforming growth factor-β type I receptor (ALK5) inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 2009;44:4259–65.10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.07.008Suche in Google Scholar

58. Li, R, Fan, W, Tian, G, Zhu, H, He, L, Cai, J, et al.. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature 2010;463:311–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08696.Suche in Google Scholar

59. Nessling, M, Solinas-Toldo, S, Lichter, P, Reifenberger, G, Wolter, M, Moller, P, et al.. Genomic imbalances are rare in hairy cell leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;26:182–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199910)26:2<182::aid-gcc13>3.0.co;2-z.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199910)26:2<182::AID-GCC13>3.0.CO;2-ZSuche in Google Scholar

60. Pollack, JR, Perou, CM, Alizadeh, AA, Eisen, MB, Pergamenschikov, A, Williams, CF, et al.. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet 1999;23:41–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/12640.Suche in Google Scholar

61. Macgregor, PF, Jeremy, A. Application of microarrays to the analysis of gene expression in cancer. Clin Chem 2002;48:1170–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.8.1170.Suche in Google Scholar

62. Uthuppan, J, Soni, K. Conformational analysis: a review. Int J Pharmaceut Sci Res 2013;4:34–41.Suche in Google Scholar

63. Cheung, DL, Alessandro, T. Modelling charge transport in organic semiconductors: from quantum dynamics to soft matter. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2008;10:5941–52. https://doi.org/10.1039/b807750a.Suche in Google Scholar

64. Cheung, DL. Molecular simulation of nanoparticle diffusion at fluid interfaces. Chem Phys Lett 2010;495:55–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2010.06.074.Suche in Google Scholar

65. Moller, W, Eckstein, W. Tridyn – a TRIM simulation code including dynamic composition changes. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 1984;2:814–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583x(84)90321-5.Suche in Google Scholar

66. Hemert, FJ, Amons, R, Wim, JMP, Hans, VO, Moller, W. The primary structure of elongation factor EF-lac from the brine shrimp Artemia. EMBO J 1984;3:1109–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb01937.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

67. Milik, M, Skolnick, J. Insertion of peptide chains into lipid membranes: an off-lattice Monte Carlo dynamics model. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1993;15:10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340150104.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

68. Chaslot, GMJB, Winands, MHM, Szita, I, van den Herik, HJ. Cross entropy for Monte Carlo tree search. ICGA J (Int Comput Games Assoc) 2008;31:145–56. https://doi.org/10.3233/icg-2008-31303.Suche in Google Scholar

69. Hansson, T, Chris, O, Gunsteren, WF. Molecular dynamics simulations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:190–6.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00308-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Friesner, RA, Banks, JL, Murphy, RB, Halgren, TA, Klicic, JJ, Mainz, DT, et al.. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J Med Chem 2004;47:1739–49. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0306430.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

71. Methe, BA, Nelson, KE, Deming, JW, Momen, B, Melamud, E, Zhang, X, et al.. The psychrophilic lifestyle as revealed by the genome sequence of Colwellia psychrerythraea 34H through genomic and proteomic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:10913–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504766102.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

72. Peng, Y, Li, Z, John, M. Loss of protein structure stability as a major causative factor in monogenic disease. J Mol Biol 2005;353:459–73.10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

73. Jacques, MJ, Pierre, C, Jacob, F. Allosteric proteins and cellular control systems. J Mol Biol 1963;6:306–29.10.1016/S0022-2836(63)80091-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

74. Edmunds, NS, McGuffin, LJ. Computational methods for the elucidation of protein structure and interactions. Methods Mol Biol 2021;2305:23–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1406-8_2.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2022-01-06

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Magnetic characterization of magnetoactive elastomers containing magnetic hard particles using first-order reversal curve analysis
  4. Microscopic understanding of particle-matrix interaction in magnetic hybrid materials by element-specific spectroscopy
  5. Biodeinking: an eco-friendly alternative for chemicals based recycled fiber processing
  6. Bio-based polyurethane aqueous dispersions
  7. Cellulose-based polymers
  8. Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites
  9. Natural substances in cancer—do they work?
  10. Personalized and targeted therapies
  11. Identification of potential histone deacetylase inhibitory biflavonoids from Garcinia kola (Guttiferae) using in silico protein-ligand interaction
  12. Chemical computational approaches for optimization of effective surfactants in enhanced oil recovery
  13. Social media and learning in an era of coronavirus among chemistry students in tertiary institutions in Rivers State
  14. Techniques for the detection and quantification of emerging contaminants
  15. Occurrence, fate, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in a diverse ecosystem
  16. Updates on the versatile quinoline heterocycles as anticancer agents
  17. Trends in microbial degradation and bioremediation of emerging contaminants
  18. Power to the city: Assessing the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in multiple cities of Ecuador
  19. Phytoremediation as an effective tool to handle emerging contaminants
  20. Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review
  21. Integrating multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment: a novel methodology for sustainable process design
  22. A conversation on the quartic equation of the secular determinant of methylenecyclopropene
  23. Recent developments in the synthesis and anti-cancer activity of acridine and xanthine-based molecules
  24. An overview of in silico methods used in the design of VEGFR-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents
  25. Fragment based drug design
  26. Advances in heterocycles as DNA intercalating cancer drugs
  27. Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines
  28. Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches
  29. Membrane technologies for sports supplementation
  30. Fused pyrrolo-pyridines and pyrrolo-(iso)quinoline as anticancer agents
  31. Membrane applications in the food industry
  32. Membrane techniques in the production of beverages
  33. Statistical methods for in silico tools used for risk assessment and toxicology
  34. Dicarbonyl compounds in the synthesis of heterocycles under green conditions
  35. Green synthesis of triazolo-nucleoside conjugates via azide–alkyne C–N bond formation
  36. Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances
  37. Survival is the driver for adaptation: safety engineering changed the future, security engineering prevented disasters and transition engineering navigates the pathway to the climate-safe future
Heruntergeladen am 14.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2018-0157/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen