Startseite Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review

  • Venkatesa Prabhu Sundramurthy ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Thirumullaivoyal G. Nithya , Chandran Masi , Chinnasamy Gomadurai und Ebrahim M. Abda ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. Dezember 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Any material when utilized for a required period of time and segment, the leftover residues of those materials are known as waste. Enormous waste is generated during such wear and tear process of materials depending on the usage and functions in a routine lifestyle. Those generated waste when overloaded beyond the capacity of natural recycling processes, would influence the environment and human health. Hence, the waste generated from used materials should be managed according to the environmental impact. Even though wastes are also sometimes rich in organic compounds, nutrients, and energy resources, they are not experimented and managed appropriately. Recently, different feasible techniques are invented and followed to recover and reuse the efficient resources that can create and support sustainable livelihood by creating green economy effects by reducing waste. In this chapter, the emphasis has been given to providing an overview of recent advancements on bio-based waste management and product recoveries such as microbes mediated approaches, biorefineries for waste valorization, and bioenergy from industrial waste.


Corresponding author: Venkatesa Prabhu Sundramurthy, Phd, Department of Chemical Engineering, Center of Excellence for Bioprocess and Biotechnology, Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Chen, Y. Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions and energy recovery from municipal and industrial solid waste using waste-to-energy technology. J Clean Prod 2018;192:26–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.260.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Banu, JR, Yukesh Kannah, R, Dinesh Kumar, M, Gunasekaran, M, Sivagurunathan, P, Park, J-H, et al.. Recent advances on biogranules formation in dark hydrogen fermentation system: mechanism of formation and microbial characteristics. Bioresour Technol 2018;268:787–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.034.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Jones, PT, Geysen, D, Tielemans, Y, Van Passel, S, Pontikes, Y, Blanpain, B, et al.. Enhanced landfill mining in view of multiple resource recovery: a critical review. J Clean Prod 2013;55:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.021.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Antwi, P, Li, JM, Boadi, PO, Meng, J, Shi, E, Deng, K, et al.. Estimation of biogas and methane yields in an UASB treating potato starch processing wastewater with backpropagation artificial neural network. Bioresour Technol 2017;228:106–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.045.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Sharholy, M, Ahmad, K, Vaishya, R, Gupta, R. Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Allahabad, India. Waste Manag 2007;27:490–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Mubarok, MZ, Winarko, R, Chaerun, SK, Rizki, IN, Ichlas, ZT. Improving gold recovery from refractory gold ores through biooxidation using iron-sulfur-oxidizing/sulfur-oxidizing mixotrophic bacteria. Hydrometallurgy 2017;168:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.10.018.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Ahmed, E, Ahmed, T, Abimbola, E, Sheena, K, Faizal, B. Pathways of 3-biofules (hydrogen, ethanol and methane) production from petrochemical industry wastewater via anaerobic packed bed baffled reactor inoculated with mixed culture bacteria. Energy Convers Manag 2016;122:119–30.10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.067Suche in Google Scholar

8. Alemany, AG, Skiadas, IV, Gavala, HN. Syngas biomethanation: state-of-the-art review and perspectives. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2018;12:139–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1826.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Majumder, D, Maity, JP, Tseng, MJ, Nimje, VR, Chen, HR, Chen, CC, et al.. Electricity generation and wastewater treatment of oil refinery in microbial fuel cells using Pseudomonas putida. Int J Mol Sci 2014;15:16772–86. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms150916772.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Li, WW, Yu, HQ. From wastewater to bioenergy and biochemical via two-stage bioconversion processes: a future paradigm. Biotechnol Adv 2011;29:972–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.012.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Joshi, N, Naresh Dholakiya, R, Anil Kumar, M, Mody, KH. Recycling of starch processing industrial wastewater as a sole nutrient source for the bioflocculant production. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2017;36:1458–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12608.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Fu, B, Liu, KC, Chen, JF, Teng, JG. Concrete reinforced with macro fibres recycled from waste GFRP. Construct Build Mater 2021;310:125063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125063.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Marrocchino, E, Zanelli, C, Guarini, G, Dondi, M. Recycling mining and construction wastes as temper in clay bricks. Appl Clay Sci 2021;209:106152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2021.106152.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Siddiqui, Z, Hagare, D, Jayasena, V, Swick, R, Rahman, MM, Boyle, N, et al.. Recycling of food waste to produce chicken feed and liquid fertiliser. Waste Manag 2021;131:386–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.06.016.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Xing, Y, Luo, X, Liu, S, Wan, W, Huang, Q, Chen, W. A novel eco-friendly recycling of food waste for preparing biofilm-attached biochar to remove Cd and Pb in wastewater. J Clean Prod 2021;311:127514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127514.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Karakashev, D, Batstone, DJ, Trably, E, Angelidaki, I. Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of methanosaetaceae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:5138–41. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00489-06.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Kirankumar, P, Krishna, SV, Chaitanya, N, Bhagawan, D, Himabindu, V, Narasu, ML. Effect of operational parameters on biohydrogen production from dairy wastewater in batch and continuous reactors. Biofuels 2017;8:693–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1196327.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Pandey, P, Shinde, VN, Deopurkar, RL, Kale, SP, Patil, SA, Pant, D. Recent advances in the use of different substrates in microbial fuel cells toward wastewater treatment and simultaneous energy recovery. Appl Energy 2016;168:706–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.056.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Van Der Bruggen, B, Vandecasteele, C, Van Gestel, T, Doyen, W, Leysen, R. A review of pressure-driven membrane processes in wastewater treatment and drinking water production. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2003;22:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670220116.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Matassa, S, Batstone, DJ, Hulsen, T, Schnoor, J, Verstraete, W. Can direct conversion of used nitrogen to new feed and protein help feed the world? Environ Sci Technol 2015;49:5247–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505432w.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Mohan, SV, Chiranjeevi, P, Dahiya, S, Kumar, AN. Waste derived bioeconomy in India: a perspective. N Biotechnol 2018;40:609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.006.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Cheng, H, Hu, Y. Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable source of energy: current and future practices in China. Bioresour Technol 2010;101:3816–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.040.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Kibler, KM, Reinhart, D, Hawkins, C, Motlagh, AM, Wrightm, J. Food waste and the food-energy-water nexus: a review of food waste management alternatives. Waste Manag 2018;74:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.014.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Rughoonundun, H, Mohee, R, Holtzapple, MT. Influence of carbon-to-nitrogen ratio on the mixed-acid fermentation of wastewater sludge and pretreated bagasse. Bioresour Technol 2012;112:91–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.081.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Zhang, X, He, W, Ren, L, Stager, J, Evans, PJ, Logan, BE. COD removal characteristics in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 2015;176:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Yu, L, Zhang, W, Liu, H, Wang, G, Liu, H. Evaluation of volatile fatty acids production and dewaterability of waste activated sludge with different thermo-chemical pretreatments. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2018;129:170–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.02.008.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Habibollahzade, A, Houshfar, E, Ashjaee, M, Behzadi, A, Gholamian, E, Mehdizadeh, H. Enhanced power generation through integrated renewable energy plants: solar chimney and waste-to-energy. Energy Convers Manag 2018;166:48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.010.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Jepsen, MS, Jensen, PA, Clausen, S, Fateev, A, Glarborg, P, Norman, T. Measurements of the NOX precursors and major species concentrations above the grate at a waste-to-energy plant. Fuel 2018;222:475–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.177.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Ong, KL, Kaur, G, Pensupa, N, Uisan, K, Lin, CSK. Trends in food waste valorization for the production of chemicals, materials and fuels: case study South and Southeast Asia. Bioresour Technol 2018;248:100–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.076.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Bayard, R, de Araujo Morais, J, Ducom, G, Achour, F, Rouez, M, Gourdon, R. Assessment of the effectiveness of an industrial unit of mechanical-biological treatment of municipal solid waste. J Hazard Mater 2010;175:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.049.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Mussatto, SI, Dragone, G, Guimaraes, PMR, Silva, JPA, Carneiro, LM, Roberto, IC, et al.. Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bioethanol production. Biotechnol Adv 2010;28:817–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Maina, S, Koutinas, A, Kachrimanidou, V. From waste to bio-based products: a roadmap towards a circular and sustainable bioeconomy. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 2017;8:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.07.007.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Kumar, A, Samadder, SR. A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 2017;69:407–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.046.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Ojha, N, Karn, R, Abbas, S, Bhugra, S. Bioremediation of industrial wastewater. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;796:012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/796/1/012012.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Shah, A, Shah, M. Characterisation and bioremediation of wastewater: a review exploring bioremediation as a sustainable technique for pharmaceutical wastewater. Groundw Sustain Dev 2020;11:100383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100383.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Fazal, T, Mushtaq, A, Rehman, F, Ullah Khan, A, Rashid, N, Farooq, W, et al.. Bioremediation of textile wastewater and successive biodiesel production using microalgae. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;82:3107–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.029.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Obaja, D. Biological nutrient removal by a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) using an internal organic carbon source in digested piggery wastewater. Bioresour Technol 2005;96:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Tao, B, Passanha, P, Kumi, P, Wilson, V, Jones, D, Esteves, S. Recovery and concentration of thermally hydrolysed waste activated sludge derived volatile fatty acids and nutrients by microfiltration, electrodialysis and struvite precipitation for polyhydroxyalkanoates production. Chem Eng J 2016;295:11–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.036.Suche in Google Scholar

39. Arafat, HA, Jijakli, K. Modelling and comparative assessment of municipal solid waste gasification for energy production. Waste Manag 2013;33:1704–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.04.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Bengelsdorf, FR, Durre, P. Gas fermentation for commodity chemicals and fuels. Microb Biotechnol 2017;10:1167–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12763.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Drzyzga, O, Revelles, O, Durante-Rodríguez, G, Díaz, E, García, JL, Prieto, A. New challenges for syngas fermentation: towards production of biopolymers. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 2015;90:1735–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4721.Suche in Google Scholar

42. Ramachandriya, KD, Kundiyana, DK, Sharma, AM, Kumar, A, Atiyeh, HK, Huhnke, RL, et al.. Critical factors affecting the integration of biomass gasification and syngas fermentation technology. Aims Bioeng 2016;3:188–210. https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2016.2.188.Suche in Google Scholar

43. Mohan, SV, Nikhil, GN, Chiranjeevi, P, Reddy, CN, Rohit, MV, Kumar, AN, et al.. Waste biorefinery models towards sustainable circular bioeconomy: critical review and future perspectives. Bioresour Technol 2016;215:2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.130.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Yasin, HMN, Mumtaz, T, Hassan, MA, Rahman, NA. Food waste and food processing waste for biohydrogen production: a review. J Environ Manag 2013;130:375–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.09.009.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Saratale, GD, Jung, MY, Oh, MK. Reutilization of green liquor chemicals for pretreatment of whole rice waste biomass and its application to 2,3-butanediol production. Bioresour Technol 2016;205:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.028.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Sun, L, Fujii, M, Tasaki, T, Dong, H, Ohnishi, S. Improving waste to energy rate by promoting an integrated municipal solid-waste management system. Resour Conserv Recycl 2018;136:289–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.005.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Martin, NH, Torres-Frenzel, P, Wiedmann, M. Invited review: controlling dairy product spoilage to reduce food loss and waste. J Dairy Sci 2021;104:1251–61. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19130.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Luqman, M, Al-Ansari, T. A novel solution towards zero waste in dairy farms: a thermodynamic study of an integrated polygeneration approach. Energy Convers Manag 2021;230:113753–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113753.Suche in Google Scholar

49. Kaur, N. Different treatment techniques of dairy wastewater. Groundwater Sustain Dev 2021;14:100640–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100640.Suche in Google Scholar

50. Guzmán-Luna, P, Mauricio-Iglesias, M, Anna, F, Hospido, A. Analysing the interaction between the dairy sector and climate change from a life cycle perspective: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.09.001. In press.Suche in Google Scholar

51. Tripathi, AD, Paul, V, Agarwal, A, Sharma, R, Hashempour-Baltork, F, Rashidi, L, et al.. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates using dairy processing waste – a review. Bioresour Technol 2021;326:124735–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124735.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

52. Dalke, R, Demro, D, Khalid, Y, Wu, H, Urgun-Demirtas, M. Current status of anaerobic digestion of food waste in the United States. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021;151:111554–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111554.Suche in Google Scholar

53. Mostakim, K, Arefin, MA, Islam, MT, Shifullah, KM, Islam, MA. Harnessing energy from the waste produced in Bangladesh: evaluating potential technologies. Heliyon 2021;7:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08221.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

54. Giraud, RJ, Taylor, PH, Huang, C-P. Combustion operating conditions for municipal waste-to-energy facilities in the U.S. Waste Manag 2021;132:124–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.015.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Istrate, I-R, Medina-Martos, E, Galvez-Martos, J-L, Dufour, J. Assessment of the energy recovery potential of municipal solid waste under future scenarios. Appl Energy 2021;293:116915–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116915.Suche in Google Scholar

56. Fashola, MO, Ngole Jeme, VM, Babalola, OO. Heavy metal pollution from gold mines: environmental effects and bacterial strategies for resistance. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2016;13:1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111047.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

57. Feng, S, Yang, H, Wang, W. Microbial community succession mechanism coupling with adaptive evolution of adsorption performance in chalcopyrite bioleaching. Bioresour Technol 2015;191:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.122.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Maurya, RK, Patel, AR, Sarkar, P, Singh, H, Tyagi, H. Biomass, its potential and applications. In: Kumar, S, Sani, RK (eds.), Biorefining of biomass to biofuels. Cham: Springer; 2018:25–52 pp.10.1007/978-3-319-67678-4_2Suche in Google Scholar

59. Yu, IKM, Tsang, DCW. Conversion of biomass to hydroxymethylfurfural: a review of catalytic systems and underlying mechanisms. Bioresour Technol 2017;238:716–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.026.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Toor, SS, Rosendahl, L, Rudolf, A. Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: a review of subcritical water technologies. Energy 2011;36:2328–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.013.Suche in Google Scholar

61. Lim, JS, Manan, ZA, Alwi, SRW, Hashim, H. A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16:3084–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.051.Suche in Google Scholar

62. Ravindran, R, Jaiswal, AK. Exploitation of food industry waste for high-value products. Trends Biotechnol 2016;34:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.10.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

63. Toldra, F, Aristoy, M-C, Mora, L, Reig, M. Innovations in value-addition of edible meat by-products. Meat Sci 2012;92:290–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2021-12-15

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Magnetic characterization of magnetoactive elastomers containing magnetic hard particles using first-order reversal curve analysis
  4. Microscopic understanding of particle-matrix interaction in magnetic hybrid materials by element-specific spectroscopy
  5. Biodeinking: an eco-friendly alternative for chemicals based recycled fiber processing
  6. Bio-based polyurethane aqueous dispersions
  7. Cellulose-based polymers
  8. Biodegradable shape-memory polymers and composites
  9. Natural substances in cancer—do they work?
  10. Personalized and targeted therapies
  11. Identification of potential histone deacetylase inhibitory biflavonoids from Garcinia kola (Guttiferae) using in silico protein-ligand interaction
  12. Chemical computational approaches for optimization of effective surfactants in enhanced oil recovery
  13. Social media and learning in an era of coronavirus among chemistry students in tertiary institutions in Rivers State
  14. Techniques for the detection and quantification of emerging contaminants
  15. Occurrence, fate, and toxicity of emerging contaminants in a diverse ecosystem
  16. Updates on the versatile quinoline heterocycles as anticancer agents
  17. Trends in microbial degradation and bioremediation of emerging contaminants
  18. Power to the city: Assessing the rooftop solar photovoltaic potential in multiple cities of Ecuador
  19. Phytoremediation as an effective tool to handle emerging contaminants
  20. Recent advances and prospects for industrial waste management and product recovery for environmental appliances: a review
  21. Integrating multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment: a novel methodology for sustainable process design
  22. A conversation on the quartic equation of the secular determinant of methylenecyclopropene
  23. Recent developments in the synthesis and anti-cancer activity of acridine and xanthine-based molecules
  24. An overview of in silico methods used in the design of VEGFR-2 inhibitors as anticancer agents
  25. Fragment based drug design
  26. Advances in heterocycles as DNA intercalating cancer drugs
  27. Systems biology–the transformative approach to integrate sciences across disciplines
  28. Pharmaceutical interest of in-silico approaches
  29. Membrane technologies for sports supplementation
  30. Fused pyrrolo-pyridines and pyrrolo-(iso)quinoline as anticancer agents
  31. Membrane applications in the food industry
  32. Membrane techniques in the production of beverages
  33. Statistical methods for in silico tools used for risk assessment and toxicology
  34. Dicarbonyl compounds in the synthesis of heterocycles under green conditions
  35. Green synthesis of triazolo-nucleoside conjugates via azide–alkyne C–N bond formation
  36. Anaerobic digestion fundamentals, challenges, and technological advances
  37. Survival is the driver for adaptation: safety engineering changed the future, security engineering prevented disasters and transition engineering navigates the pathway to the climate-safe future
Heruntergeladen am 23.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/psr-2021-0063/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen