Biodeinking: an eco-friendly alternative for chemicals based recycled fiber processing

References

1. Bajpai PK. Solving the problems of recycled fiber processing with enzymes. BioResour. 2010;5:1311–25.10.15376/biores.5.2.1311-1325Search in Google Scholar

2. Tsatsis DE, Papachristos DK, Valta KA, Vlyssides AG, Economides DG. Enzymatic deinking for recycling of office waste paper. J Environ Chem Eng. 2017;5:1744–53.10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.007Search in Google Scholar

3. Magnaghi G. Recovered paper market in 2012. Recovered paper statistics. BIR (Bureau International Recycling) global facts & figures, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

4. Rodriguez C, Alaswad A, El-Hassan Z, Olabi AG. Mechanical pretreatment of waste paper for biogas production. Waste Manage. 2017;68:157–64.10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.040Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Lee HV, Hamid SB, Zain SK. Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to nanocellulose: structure and chemical process. The Sci World J. 2014:2014.10.1155/2014/631013Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Global forest products (including paper) facts and figures FAO. 2018. http://www.fao.org/3/CA2839EN/ca2839en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

7. Alig JT. Recycling and wastepaper: legislative trends. In: Proceedings of 1993 Recycling symposium. New Orleans, USA: Tappi Press, 1993:95–121.Search in Google Scholar

8. Carr WF. New trends in deinking technology: removing difficult inks from wastepaper. Tappi J. 1991;74:127–32.Search in Google Scholar

9. Davis A, Kinsella S. Recycled paper: exploring the myths. United Kingdom: Garbage Mag, 1990:48–53.Search in Google Scholar

10. Garcia DA. Recycling capacity to increase at record rates as laws proliferate. Canada: Pulp Pap, 1991:S1–5.Search in Google Scholar

11. Thompson CG. “Recycled paper” the essential guide. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 1992:67.Search in Google Scholar

12. Bajpai P, Bajpai PK. Deinking with enzymes: a review. Tappi J. 1998;81:111–17.Search in Google Scholar

13. Costa CA, Rubio J. Deinking flotation: influence of calcium soap and surface-active substances. Miner Eng. 2005;18:59–64.10.1016/j.mineng.2004.05.014Search in Google Scholar

14. Crow DR, Secor RF. The ten steps of deinking. Tappi J. 1987;70:101–6.Search in Google Scholar

15. Leung MY, Bennington CJ. Quantifying the force of ink attachment in ink removal operations. J Pulp Pap Sci. 2001;27:26–33.Search in Google Scholar

16. Makoto I. Trends in paper waste recycling technology. Kami Parupu Gijutsu Taimusu. 1990;33:6Search in Google Scholar

17. Pathak P, Bhardwaj NK, Singh AK. Optimization of chemical and enzymatic deinking of photocopier waste paper. BioResour. 2011;6:447–63.10.15376/biores.6.1.447-463Search in Google Scholar

18. Pelach MA, Pastor FJ, Puig J, Vilaseca F, Mutje P. Enzymic deinking of old newspapers with cellulase. Process Biochem. 2003;38:1063–7.10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00237-6Search in Google Scholar

19. Shrinath A, Szewczak JT, Bowen IJ. A review of ink-removal techniques in current deinking technology. Tappi J. 1991;74:85–93.Search in Google Scholar

20. Sorenson D. Environmental concerns, economics drive paper recycling technology. USA: Pulp and paper, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

21. Peter R, Hugh L. Flotation deinking process. United States Patent Application Publication, Pub. No. US 2002/0066880. 2002.Search in Google Scholar

22. Gammauf EG. Flotation deinking compared with wash deinking. Wochenbl Papier fabr. 1990;118:761.Search in Google Scholar

23. Klaus S. Chemical system in a wash deinking. Wochenbl Papier fabr. 1990;118:233.Search in Google Scholar

24. King RP. Principles of flotation. Kelvin House, 2 Holland St, Johannesburg, South Africa: South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1982:268.Search in Google Scholar

25. Bratby J, Marais GV. Flotation. In: Purchas DB, editor. Solid/Liquid separation equipment scale-up. New York: Upland Press, 1977:155–168Search in Google Scholar

26. Gochin RJ. Flotation. In: Svarovsky L, editor. Solid-liquid separation. London: Butterworths, 1990:591–613.10.1016/B978-0-408-03765-5.50026-9Search in Google Scholar

27. Irenee JP, Frank JS, Thomas ET, Marry BK, Michael AS, John CH. Uses of polymers in the recycled fiber washing/deinking process. J Cleaner Prod. 1997;5:251.10.1016/S0959-6526(97)85869-6Search in Google Scholar

28. El-Shall H, Moudgil BM, El-Midany A. Separation of ink particles from waste paper by fine-bubbles. KONA Powder Part J. 2005;23:122–8.10.14356/kona.2005015Search in Google Scholar

29. Bolanča I, Bolanča Z. Chemical and enzymatic deinking flotation of digital prints. In: 4th International DAAAM conference “Industrial Engineering-Innovation as competitive edge for Sme. 2004.Search in Google Scholar

30. Quick TH, Hodgson KT. Xerography deinking- a fundamental approach. Tappi J. 1986;69:102–6.Search in Google Scholar

31. Sreenath HK, Yang VW, Burdsall JHH, Jeffries TW. Toner removal by alkaline active cellulases from desert Basidiomycetes. In: Jeffries TW, Viikari L editors. Enzymes for pulp and paper processing. ACS symposium series 655. proceedings, 211th ACS national meeting of the cellulose, paper, and textile division, New Orleans, LA. Washington, DC, (USA): American Chemical Society, 24–28 Mar 1996:267–79.10.1021/bk-1996-0655.ch021Search in Google Scholar

32. Azevedo MA, Drelich J, Miller JD. The effect of pH on pulping and flotation of mixed office wastepaper. J Pulp Pap Sci. 1999;25:317–20.Search in Google Scholar

33. Ow SK, Park JM, Han SH, Srebotnik E, Messner K. Effects of enzyme on ink size and distribution during the enzymatic deinking process of old newsprint. In: Proceeding of 6th International conference on biotechnol. Vienna, Austria: Pulp and Paper Industry, 1995:163Á/168.Search in Google Scholar

34. Wielen LC, Panek JC, Pfromm PH. Fracture of toner due to paper swelling. Tappi J. 1999;82:115–21.Search in Google Scholar

35. Bhat GR, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW. Novel techniques for enhancing the strength of secondary fiber. Tappi J. 1991;74:151–7.Search in Google Scholar

36. Marton R, Brown A, Granzow S, Koeppicus R, Tomlinson S. Recycling and fiber structure. Prog Pap Recycl. 1993;3:58–70.Search in Google Scholar

37. Pala H, Mota M, Gama FM. Factors influencing MOW deinking: Laboratory scale studies. Enz Microb Technol. 2006;38:81–7.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.04.022Search in Google Scholar

38. Zeyer C, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW, Rucke JW Performance study of enzymatic deinking using cellulase/hemicellulase blends. In: Proceedings of the 6th International conference on biotechnol. Vienna, Austria: Pulp and Paper Industry, 1995:169–72.Search in Google Scholar

39. Dorris G, Lapierre L, Haynes RD, Hill G Outlook for near-neutral deinking in newsprint production. In: CTP-PTS 6th advanced training course on deinking. 2003.Search in Google Scholar

40. Dorris GM, Page N. Natural and accelerated aging of old newspapers printed with black mineral oil inks and colored vegetable oil inks with good inks with good deinkability. Prog Pap Recycl. 2000;9:14–26.Search in Google Scholar

41. Vyas S, Lachke A. Biodeinking of mixed office waste paper by alkaline active cellulases from alkalotolerant Fusarium sp. Enz Microb Technol. 2003;32:236–45.10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00273-9Search in Google Scholar

42. Welt T, Dinus R. Enzymatic deinking. Prog Pap Recycl. 1995;4:36–47.Search in Google Scholar

43. Jeffries TW, Klungness JH, Sykes MS, Rutledge-Cropsey KR. Comparison of enzyme-enhanced with conventional deinking of xerographic and laser-printed paper. Tappi J. 1994;77:173–9.Search in Google Scholar

44. Kim TJ, Ow SS, Eom TJ. Enzymatic deinking method of wastepaper. Tappi Pulping Conf Proc. 1991;45:1023–31.10.2524/jtappij.45.1377Search in Google Scholar

45. Lee CK, Darah I, Ibrahim CO. Enzymatic deinking of laser printed office waste papers: some governing parameters on deinking efficiency. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:1684–9.10.1016/j.biortech.2006.05.052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Marques S, Pala H, Alves L, Amaral-Collaco MT, Gama FM, Gırio FM. Characterisation and application of glycanases secreted by Aspergillus terreus CCMI 498 and Trichoderma viride CCMI 84 for enzymatic deinking of mixed office wastepaper. J Biotechnol. 2003;100:209–19.10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00247-XSearch in Google Scholar

47. Mohandass C, Raghukumar C. Biological deinking of inkjet-printed paper using Vibrio alginolyticus and its enzymes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;32:424–9.10.1007/s10295-005-0017-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Soni R, Chadha B, Saini HS. Novel sources of fungal cellulases of thermophilic/thermotolerant for efficient deinking of composite paper waste. Bio Resour. 2008;3:234–46.10.15376/biores.3.1.234-246Search in Google Scholar

49. Viesturs U, Leite M, Eisimonte M, Eremeeva T, Treimanis A. Biological deinking technology for the recycling of office waste papers. Bioresour Technol. 1999;67:255–65.10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00119-9Search in Google Scholar

50. Prasad DY, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW. Enzymatic deinking of colored offset newsprint. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J. 1993;8:284–6.10.3183/npprj-1993-08-02-p284-286Search in Google Scholar

51. Heise OU, Unwin JP, Klungness JH, Fineran WG, Sykes J. Industrial scaleup of enzyme-enhanced deinking of nonimpact printed toners. Tappi J. 1996;79:207–12.Search in Google Scholar

52. Putz HJ, Wu S, Goettsching L. Enzymatic treatment of waste paper. Papier (Germany, FR). 1990;44:42–8.Search in Google Scholar

53. Saari J. New process engineering for deinking. In: Proceeding of 8th Pira International conference. Prague. 2004: 17–18.Search in Google Scholar

54. Paik KH, Park JY. Enzyme deinking of newsprint waste. I: effect of cellulase and xylanase on brightness, yield and physical properties of deinked pulps. J Korea Tappi. 1993;25:42.Search in Google Scholar

55. Qin M, Gao P, Yinbo Q, Fu Y, Shao Z, Quan W. Physical characteristics of enzymatically modified fibers from old newsprint. Proc Int Symp Emerging Technol. 1998:462–73.Search in Google Scholar

56. Geng X, Li K, Kataeva IA, Li XL, Ljungdahl LG. Effects of two cellobiohydrolases, CbhA and CelK, from Clostridium thermocellum on deinking of recycled mixed office paper. Prog Pap Recycl. 2003;12:6–10.Search in Google Scholar

57. Lee JM, Eom TJ. Enzymatic deinking of old newsprint with alkalophilic enzymes from Coprinus cinereus 2249. J Korea Tech Assoc Pulp Pap Ind. 1999;31:12–17.Search in Google Scholar

58. Selvam K, Swaminathan K, Rasappan K, Rajendran R, Michael A, Pattabi S. Deinking of waste papers by white rot fungi Fomes lividus, Thelephora sp. and Trametes versicolor. Nat Environ Pollut Technol. 2005;4:399–404.Search in Google Scholar

59. Jeffries TW, Sykes MS, Rutledge-Cropsey K, Klungness JH, Abubakr S. Enhanced removal of toners from office waste papers by microbial cellulases. In: Sixth International Conference Biotech. Pulp Pap. Ind. 1996:141–4.Search in Google Scholar

60. Mørkbak AL, Zimmermann W. Deinking of mixed office paper, old newspaper and vegetable oil-based ink printed paper using cellulases, xylanases and lipases. Prog Pap Recycl. 1998;7:14–21.Search in Google Scholar

61. Franks NE, Munk N. Alkaline cellulases and the enzymatic deinking of mixed office waste. In: Tappi pulping conference. TAPPI PRESS, 1995:343–8.Search in Google Scholar

62. Jobbins JM, Franks NE. Enzymatic deinking of mixed office waste: process condition optimization. Tappi J. 1997;80:73–8.Search in Google Scholar

63. Geng X, Li K. Deinking of recycled mixed office paper using two endo-glucanases, Cel B and Cel E, from the anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces OC-2, Tappi J, 1999;2: 29–32.Search in Google Scholar

64. Call HP, Raven AV, Leyerer H. Application of lignolytic enzymes in the production of pulp and paper (biopulping, biobleaching). Papier. 1990;44:33–41.Search in Google Scholar

65. Mørkbak A, Degn P, Zimmermann W. Deinking of soy bean oil based ink printed paper with lipases and a neutral surfactant. J Biotechnol. 1999;67:229–36.10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00179-5Search in Google Scholar

66. Gübitz GM, Mansfield SD, Böhm D, Saddler JN. Effect of endoglucanases and hemicellulases in magnetic and flotation deinking of xerographic and laser-printed papers. J Biotechnol. 1998;65:209–15.10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00130-8Search in Google Scholar

67. Dienes D, Egyhazi A, Reczey K. Treatment of recycled fiber with Trichoderma cellulases. Ind Crops Prod. 2004;20:11–21.10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.12.009Search in Google Scholar

68. Xu QH, Wang YP, Qin MH, Fu YJ, Li ZQ, Zhang FS, et al. Fiber surface characterization of old newsprint pulp deinked by combining hemicellulase with laccase-mediator system. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:6536–40.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

69. Xu Q, Fu Y, Gao Y, Qin M. Performance and efficiency of old newspaper deinking by combining cellulase/hemicellulase with laccase-violuric acid system. Waste Manage. 2009;29:1486–90.10.1016/j.wasman.2008.10.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Lee CK, Ibrahim D, Omar IC. Enzymatic deinking of various types of waste paper: efficiency and characteristics. Process Biochem. 2013;48:299–305.10.1016/j.procbio.2012.12.015Search in Google Scholar

71. Lee CK, Ibrahim D, Ibrahim CO, Daud WR. Enzymatic and chemical deinking of mixed office wastepaper and old newspaper: paper quality and effluent characteristics. BioResour. 2011;6:3859–75.10.15376/biores.6.4.3859-3875Search in Google Scholar

72. Pathak P, Bhardwaj NK, Singh AK. Enzymatic deinking for recycling of photocopier waste papers using crude cellulase and xylanase of Trichoderma harzianum PPDDN10 NFCCI 2925. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J. 2015;30:689–700.10.3183/npprj-2015-30-04-p689-700Search in Google Scholar

73. Gupta V, Garg S, Capalash N, Gupta N, Sharma P. Production of thermo-alkali-stable laccase and xylanase by co-culturing of Bacillus sp. and B. halodurans for biobleaching of kraft pulp and deinking of waste paper. bioproces. Biosyst Eng. 2015;38:947–56.10.1007/s00449-014-1340-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

74. Chutani P, Sharma KK. Concomitant production of xylanases and cellulases from Trichoderma longibrachiatum MDU-6 selected for the deinking of paper waste. Bioproces Biosyst Eng. 2016;39:747–58.10.1007/s00449-016-1555-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

75. Kumar NV, Rani ME, Gunaseeli R, Kannan ND. Paper pulp modification and deinking efficiency of cellulase-xylanase complex from Escherichia coli SD5. Int J of Biol Macromol. 2018;111:289–95.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.126Search in Google Scholar PubMed

76. Singh A, Kaur A, Yadav RD, Mahajan R. An efficient eco-friendly approach for recycling of newspaper waste. 3 Biotech. 2019;9:51.10.1007/s13205-019-1590-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

77. Rutledge-Cropsey K, Jeffries T, Klungness JH, Sykes M Preliminary results of effect of sizings on enzyme-enhanced deinking. In: TAPPI recycling symposium. 1994:103–5.Search in Google Scholar

78. Tomme P, van Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, VAN Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, Knowles J, et al. Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414: analysis of domain function in two cellobiohydrolases by limited proteolysis. Eur J Biochem. 1988;170:575–81.10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13736.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

79. Sykes M, Klungness J, Gleisner R, Abubakr S Stickie removal using neutral enzymatic repulping pressure screening. In: TAPPI proceedings, 1998 Recycling Symposium: 8–12 March 1998. New Orleans, LA. Atlanta, GA: TAPPI, 1998:291–6.Search in Google Scholar

80. Gupta MN. Enzyme function in organic solvents. Eur J Biochem. 1992;203:25–32.10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb19823.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

81. Brink LE, Tramper J, Luyben KC, Van’t Riet K. Biocatalysis in organic media. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1988;10:736–43.10.1016/0141-0229(88)90118-4Search in Google Scholar

82. Martinek K, Levashov AV, Klyachko N, Khmelnitski YL, Berezin IV. Micellar enzymology. Eur J Biochem. 1986;155:453–68.10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09512.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

83. Nagao A, Kito M. Lipase-catalyzed synthesis of fatty acid esters useful in the food industry. Biocatal. 1990;3:295–305.10.3109/10242429008992073Search in Google Scholar

84. Leonowicz A, Cho N, Luterek J, Wilkolazka A, Wojtas-Wasilewska M, Matuszewska A, et al. Fungal laccase: properties and activity on lignin. J Basic Microbiol Int J Biochem Physiol Genet Morphol Ecol Microorganisms. 2001;41:185–227.10.1002/1521-4028(200107)41:3/4<185::AID-JOBM185>3.0.CO;2-TSearch in Google Scholar

85. Yaropolov AI, Skorobogat’Ko OV, Vartanov SS, Varfolomeyev SD. Laccase: Properties, catalytic mechanism and applicability. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1994;49:257–80.10.1007/BF02783061Search in Google Scholar

86. Windish WW, Mhatre NS. Microbial amylases. In: Umbreit WW, editor. Advances in applied microbiology. vol. 7. Poole (U.K.): Academic Press, 1965:273–304 .10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70389-7Search in Google Scholar

87. Van der Maarel MJ, Van der Veen B, Uitdehaag JC, Leemhuis H, Dijkhuizen L. Properties and applications of starch-converting enzymes of the α-amylase family. J Biotechnol. 2002;94:137–55.10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00407-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

88. Pathak P, Bhardwaj NK. Fungal enzymes application for recycling of waste papers. Curr Biotechnol. 2018;7:151–67.10.2174/2211550105666160310001512Search in Google Scholar

89. Wang F, Zhang X, Zhang G, Chen J, Sang M, Long Z, et al. Studies on the environmentally friendly deinking process employing biological enzymes and composite surfactant. Cellul. 2018;25:3079–89.10.1007/s10570-018-1778-3Search in Google Scholar

90. Chen S, Su L, Chen J, Wu J. Cutinase: characteristics, preparation, and application. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:1754–67.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

91. Gamerith C, Vastano M, Ghorbanpour SM, Zitzenbacher S, Ribitsch D, Zumstein MT, et al. Enzymatic degradation of aromatic and aliphatic polyesters by P. pastoris expressed cutinase 1 from Thermobifida cellulosilytica. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:938.10.3389/fmicb.2017.00938Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

92. Pellis A, Haernvall K, Pichler CM, Ghazaryan G, Breinbauer R, Guebitz GM. Enzymatic hydrolysis of poly (ethylene furanoate). J Biotechnol. 2016;235:47–53.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.02.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

93. Yang S, Liu M, Long L, Zhang R, Ding S. Characterization of a cutinase from Myceliophthora thermophila and its application in polyester hydrolysis and deinking process. Process Biochem. 2018;66:106–12.10.1016/j.procbio.2017.11.021Search in Google Scholar

94. Baker PJ, Poultney C, Liu Z, Gross R, Montclare JK. Identification and comparison of cutinases for synthetic polyester degradation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:229–40.10.1007/s00253-011-3402-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

95. Pellis A, Acero EH, Weber H, Obersriebnig M, Breinbauer R, Srebotnik E, et al. Biocatalyzed approach for the surface functionalization of poly (L-lactic acid) films using hydrolytic enzymes. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:1739–49.10.1002/biot.201500074Search in Google Scholar PubMed

96. Ronkvist ÅM, Lu W, Feder D, Gross RA. Cutinase-catalyzed deacetylation of poly (vinyl acetate). Macromol. 2009;42:6086–97.10.1021/ma900530jSearch in Google Scholar

97. Chen S, Tong X, Woodard RW, Du G, Wu J, Chen J. Identification and characterization of bacterial cutinase. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:25854–62.10.1074/jbc.M800848200Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

98. Zhang Z, Lan D, Zhou P, Li J, Yang B, Wang Y. Control of sticky deposits in wastepaper recycling with thermophilic esterase. Cellul. 2017;24:311–21.10.1007/s10570-016-1104-xSearch in Google Scholar

99. Kenealy WR, Jeffries TW. Enzyme processes for pulp and paper: A review of recent development. In: Goodell DD, Schultz TP, editors. Wood deterioration and preservation. San Diego, CA, USA: American Chemical Society Meeting 22^1st, 2003:210–38.10.1021/bk-2003-0845.ch012Search in Google Scholar

100. Yang JL, Ma J, Eriksson KE, Srebotnik E, Messner K. Enzymatic deinking of recycled fibers-development of the ENZYNK process. In: Proceedings of the 6th International conference on biotechnology in the pulp and paper industry, advances in applied and fundamental research 1995:157–62.Search in Google Scholar

101. Pala H, Mota M, Gama FM. Enzymatic versus chemical deinking of non-impact ink printed paper. J Biotechnol. 2004;108:79–89.10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.10.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

102. Rutledge-Cropsey K, Klungness JH, Abubakr SM. Performance of enzymatically deinked recovered paper on paper machine runnability. Tappi J. 1998;81:148–51.Search in Google Scholar

103. Call HP, Strittmatter G. Application of lignolytic enzymes in the paper and pulp industry. Papier. 1992;46:32–6.Search in Google Scholar

104. Helga KZ, Leland RS. Enzymatic deinking of nonimpact printed white office paper with alpha-amylase. Tappi J. 1998;81: 166–170.Search in Google Scholar

105. Elegir G, Panizza E, Canetti M. Neutral-enzyme-assisted deinking of xerographic once waste with a cellulase-amylase mixture. Tappi J. 2000;83:71.Search in Google Scholar

106. Oksanen T, Pere J, Paavilainen L, Buchert J, Viikari L. Treatment of recycled kraft pulps with Trichoderma reesei hemicellulases and cellulases. J Biotechnol. 2000;78:39–48.10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00232-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

106. Carroll RC, Gajda TP. Mills considering new deinking line must answer environmental questions. USA: Pulp and paper, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

107. Pala H, Lemos MA, Mota M, Gama FM. Enzymatic upgrade of old paperboard containers. Enz Microb Technol. 2001;29:274–9.10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00380-5Search in Google Scholar

108. Park J, Park K. Improvement of the physical properties of reprocessed paper by using biological treatment with modified cellulase. Bioresour Technol. 2001;79:91–4.10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00185-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

109. Nathan VK, Rani ME, Gunaseeli R, Kannan ND. Enhanced biobleaching efficacy and heavy metal remediation through enzyme mediated lab-scale paper pulp deinking process. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;203:926–32.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.335Search in Google Scholar

110. Gao S, Li L, Lin Y, Han S. Deinkability of different secondary fibers by enzymes. Nordic Pulp Pap Res J. 2018;33:12–20.10.1515/npprj-2018-3014Search in Google Scholar

111. Leenen M, Tausche J. Principles of enzymatic deinking (EDT) and practical implementation in a paper mill. In: eighth pira international conference on paper recycling technology. Prague, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

111. Puneet P, Bhardwaj NK, Singh AK. Enzymatic deinking of office waste paper: an overview. IPPTA. 2010;22:83–88.Search in Google Scholar

112. Tausche JG. Mill-scale benefits in enzymatic deinking. In: Proceedings 7th recycling technology conference. 2002:1–3.Search in Google Scholar

112. Robinson P, Lavery H. inventors; kao specialties Americas LLC, assignee. flotation deinking process. United States patent US. 6, 544,383. 2003:8.Search in Google Scholar

113. Mohammed SH. Enzymatic deinking: a bright solution with a bright future. IPPTA. 2010;22:137–8.Search in Google Scholar

114. Magnin L, Delpech P, Lantto R. Potential of enzymatic deinking. In: Viikari L, Lantto R, editors. Progress in biotechnology-amsterdam. vol. 21. Elsevier, 2002:323–32.10.1016/S0921-0423(02)80035-1Search in Google Scholar

115. Eriksson KE, Adolphson RB. Pulp bleaching and deinking pilot plants use chlorine-free process. Tappi J. 1997;80:80–1.Search in Google Scholar

116. Knudsen O, Young JD, Yang JL. Mill experience of a new technology at Stora Dalum deinking plant. In: PTS-CTP deinking symposium. 1998:5–7.Search in Google Scholar

117. Tausche JC. FURNISHING BETTER DEINKING how enzymes can be tailor made to meet a mill’s recycling needs. Pulp Pap Int. 2005;47:20.Search in Google Scholar

118. Tausche JC. Deinking mills dodge financial crunch with customized enzymes. Pulp Pap. 2005;79:49–51.Search in Google Scholar

119. Gill R, Hillerbrand M, Keijsers E, Kessel LV, Loosvelt I, Lund H, et al. Enzymatic deinking of recycled paper: from laboratory to mill scale. In: 10th international congress on biotechnology in the pulp and paper industry 10–15 Jun 2007. vol. 2, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: Indus APP, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

120. Qian Y, Goodell B. Deinking of laser printed copy paper with a mediated free radical system. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96:913–20.10.1016/j.biortech.2004.08.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed