Startseite Technik Deep learning-based precipitate quantification in STEM images of complex steel microstructures
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Deep learning-based precipitate quantification in STEM images of complex steel microstructures

  • M. Müller

    Martin Müller studied materials science and engineering at Saarland University. He then worked in the forging and ring rolling industry before returning to Saarland University to do his PhD on AI-based microstructure analysis in collaboration with MECS. He now heads the steel and AI research projects there.

    EMAIL logo
    , J. Barrirero

    Jenifer Barrirero has 10+ years of experience in research and knowledge transfer, with over 30 scientific publications. She holds a PhD in Materials Science and works at the Chair of Functional Materials in Saarbrücken and the Steinbeis Center MECS. Her expertise lies in high-resolution materials characterization, metallurgy and a recent focus on circularity in EV batteries.

    , E. Detemple , T. Staudt , P. Lalley , D. Britz und F. Mücklich
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. September 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Understanding precipitate evolution in microalloyed high-strength low-alloyed (HSLA) steels is essential for optimizing their processing and mechanical properties. In this work, we present an automated workflow for precipitate quantification in scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of niobium and titanium HSLA steels, combining deep learning-based semantic segmentation with conventional image processing techniques. Among the different STEM image contrasts tested, the high-angle annular dark-field-based model delivered the best segmentation performance, achieving a mean intersection over union of 0.8111 and a deviation of only 5.37 % in the measured mean particle diameter. The workflow’s robustness and generalizability were demonstrated on unseen images of different HSLA steels, with particle counts and size distributions aligning well with expectations based on the respective alloying concepts.

Kurzfassung

Für eine Optimierung der Verarbeitung und der mechanischen Eigenschaften von mikrolegierten HSLA-Stählen (High-Strength Low-Alloyed (hochfest niedrig legiert) Stählen ist das Verständnis der Entwicklung von Ausscheidungen entscheidend. In dieser Arbeit stellen wir einen automatisierten Workflow zur Quantifizierung von Ausscheidungen in rastertransmissionselektronenmikroskopischen Aufnahmen (Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy, STEM) von HSLA-Niob- und Titanstählen vor, in dem Deep Learning-basierte semantische Segmentierung und herkömmliche Bildverarbeitungsverfahren miteinander kombiniert werden. Mit einer mittleren Intersection over Union (IoU, auch Jaccard-Index) von 0,8111 und einer Abweichung von lediglich 5,37 % im gemessenen mittleren Partikeldurchmesser erzielte von den verschiedenen getesteten STEM-Bildkontrasten das HAADF-basierte Modell die beste Segmentierungsleistung. Robustheit und Generalisierbarkeit des Workflows wurden anhand bisher unbekannter Aufnahmen verschiedener HSLA-Stähle aufgezeigt, wobei Partikelanzahl und -größenverteilungen im Einklang mit den Erwartungen für die jeweiligen Legierungskonzepte stehen.

About the authors

M. Müller

Martin Müller studied materials science and engineering at Saarland University. He then worked in the forging and ring rolling industry before returning to Saarland University to do his PhD on AI-based microstructure analysis in collaboration with MECS. He now heads the steel and AI research projects there.

J. Barrirero

Jenifer Barrirero has 10+ years of experience in research and knowledge transfer, with over 30 scientific publications. She holds a PhD in Materials Science and works at the Chair of Functional Materials in Saarbrücken and the Steinbeis Center MECS. Her expertise lies in high-resolution materials characterization, metallurgy and a recent focus on circularity in EV batteries.

References / Literatur

[1] Loy, A. C. M.; Ng, W. L.; Bhattacharya, S.: Advanced characterization techniques for the development of Subatomic scale catalysts: One step closer to industrial scale fabrication. Materials Today Catalysis 4 (2024). DOI:10.1016/j.mtcata.2023.100033.10.1016/j.mtcata.2023.100033Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Hossain, N. et al.: Advances and significances of nanoparticles in semiconductor applications – A review. Elsevier B. V. (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101347.10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101347Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Mohammed, H.; Mia, M. F.; Wiggins, J.; Desai, S.: Nanomaterials for Energy Storage Systems – A Review. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2025). DOI:10.3390/molecules30040883.10.3390/molecules30040883Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Al Mahmud, M. Z.: A Concise Review of Nanoparticles Utilized Energy Storage and Conservation. Hindawi Limited (2023). DOI:10.1155/2023/5432099.10.1155/2023/5432099Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Webel, J.; Mohrbacher, H.; Detemple, E.; Britz, D.; Mücklich, F.: Quantitative analysis of mixed niobium-titanium carbonitride solubility in HSLA steels based on atom probe tomography and electrical resistivity measurements. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 18 (2022), pp. 2048–2063. DOI:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.098.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.098Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Vervynckt, S.; Verbeken, K.; Thibaux, P.; Houbaert, Y.: Recrystallization-precipitation interaction during austenite hot deformation of a Nb microalloyed steel. Materials Science and Engineering A 528 (2011) 16–17, pp. 5519–5528. DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.087.10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.087Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Saaim, K. M.; Afridi, S. K.; Nisar, M.; Islam, S.: In search of best automated model: Explaining nanoparticle TEM image segmentation. Ultramicroscopy 233 (2022). DOI:10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113437.10.1016/j.ultramic.2021.113437Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Zhou, L.; Wen, H.; Kuschnerus, I. C.; Chang, S. L. Y.: Efficientand Robust Automated Segmentation of Nanoparticles and Aggregates from Transmission Electron Microscopy Images with Highly Complex Backgrounds. Nanomaterials 14 (2024) 14. DOI:10.3390/nano14141169.10.3390/nano14141169Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liang, F.; Liu, G.; Zhu, J.: The segmentation of nanoparticles with a novel approach of HRU2-Net†. Sci Rep 15 (2025) 1, p. 2177. DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-86085-w.10.1038/s41598-025-86085-wSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Rühle, B.; Krumrey, J. F.; Hodoroaba, V. D.: Work-flow towards automated segmentation of agglomerated, non-spherical particles from electron microscopy images using artificial neural networks. Sci Rep 11 (2021) 1. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-84287-6.10.1038/s41598-021-84287-6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Monteiro, G. A. A.; Monteiro, B. A. A.; Dos Santos, J. A.; Wittemann, A.: Pre-trained artificial intelligence-aided analysis of nanoparticles using the segment anything model. Sci Rep 15 (2025) 1, p. 2341. DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-86327-x.10.1038/s41598-025-86327-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2025-07-04
Accepted: 2025-07-08
Published Online: 2025-09-18
Published in Print: 2025-09-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston, Germany

Heruntergeladen am 9.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pm-2025-0066/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen