Change and Location: A New and Old Case against Functionality

References

Bradley, F. H. 1883. The Principles of Logic. London: Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Bury, R. G. 1936. Sextus Empiricus. Against the Physicists, Against the Ethicists. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.sextus_empiricus-ethicists.1936Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1937. Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Casati, R., and A. C. Varzi. 1999. Parts and Places. The Structure of Spatial Representation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5253.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chan, W.-T. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Correia, F. 2022. “A General Theory of Location Based on the Notion of Entire Location.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (3): 555–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09641-5.Search in Google Scholar

Costa, D., and C. Calosi. 2020. “The Multi-Location Trilemma.” Erkenntnis 87 (3): 253–76.10.1007/s10670-020-00230-7Search in Google Scholar

Cotnoir, A. J., and A. C. Varzi. 2021. Mereology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198749004.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Duncombe, M. 2023. “Diodorus Cronus on Present and Past Change.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 61 (2): 167–92. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2023.0017.Search in Google Scholar

Engels, F. 1878. Anti-Dühring, in 1987. Marx, K. & Engels, F. Collected Works, Vol. 25, 5–309. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Fung, Y.-M. 2009. “The School of Names.” In History of Chinese Philosophy, edited by B. Mou, 164–88. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ganeri, J. 2001. “Philosophy in Classical India.” In The Proper Work of Reason. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Garfield, J. L. 1995. The Fundamental Wisdow of the Middle Way. Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haldane, E. S. 1892. Hegel. Lectures on History of Philosophy, Vol. 1. London: Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1830a. “Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. Teil 1. Die Wissenschaft der Logik: mit den mündlichen Zusätzen.” In 1970. Werke 8, edited by E. Moldenhauer, and K. M. Markus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1831a. “Wissenschaft der Logik I. Teil 1. Die objektive Logik, Buch 1.” In 1969. Werke 5, edited by E. Moldenhauer, and K. M. Markus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1831b. “Wissenschaft der Logik II. Teil 1. Die objektive Logik, Buch 2.” In 1969. Werke 6, edited by E. Moldenhauer, and K. M. Markus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1833. “Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Teil 1.” In 1971. Werke 18, edited by E. Moldenhauer, and K. M. Markus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, H. 2006. The Metaphysics of Hyperspace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282579.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, S. 2011. “Multilocation and Mereology.” Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1): 253–76, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2011.00215.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, S. 2017. “At it Again: Time-Travel and the At-At Account of Motion.” Erkenntnis 82 (1): 185–98, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-016-9812-z.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, D. K. 1986. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Łukasiewicz, 1910 Łukasiewicz, J. 1910. O zasadzie sprzecznos’ci u Arystotelesa (trad. fr. Sikora, D. 2000. Du principe de contradiction chez Aristote). Paris: L’Eclat.Search in Google Scholar

Marion, F. 2023. Modalité et changement. Δvναμις et cinétique aristotélicienne. PhD Thesis. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain.Search in Google Scholar

McTaggart, J. M. E. 1896. Studies in the Hegelian Dialectic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, A. V. 1969. Hegel’s Science of Logic. London: Geroges Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, J. 2007. “Theories of Location.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Vol. 3, edited by D. W. Zimmerman, 201–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199218394.003.0007.Search in Google Scholar

Perzanowski, J. 1993. “Locative Ontology. Parts I-III.” Logic and Logical Philosophy 1: 7–94. https://doi.org/10.12775/llp.1993.002.Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G. 1982. “To Be and Not to Be: Dialectical Tense Logic.” Studia Logica 41 (2–3): 249–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00370347.Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G. 1985. “Inconsistencies in Motion.” American Philosophical Quarterly 22 (4): 339–46.Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G. 2006 In Contradiction. A Study of the Transconsistent. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G. 2010. “Inclosures, Vagueness and Self-Reference.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1215/00294527-2010-005.Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G. 2013. “Vague Inclosures.” In Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications, edited by F. Berto, E. Mares, F. Paoli, and K. Tanaka, 367–77. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7_20Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G. 2017. “Contradiction and the Instant of Change Revisited.” Vivarium 55 (1–3): 217–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685349-12341337.Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G., and R. Routley. 1989a. “An Outline of the History of (Logical) Dialectic.” In Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent, edited by G. Priest, R. Routley, and J. Norman, 76–98. München: Philosophia.10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.5Search in Google Scholar

Priest, G., and R. Routley. 1989b. “The Philosophical Signifiance of Paraconsistency.” In Paraconsistent Logic. Essays on the Inconsistent, edited by G. Priest, R. Routley, and J. Norman, 483–539. München: Philosophia.10.2307/j.ctv2x8v8c7.21Search in Google Scholar

Reeder, P. 2015. “Zeno’s Arrow and the Infinitesimal Calculus.” Synthese 192 (5): 1315–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0620-1.Search in Google Scholar

Routley, R., V. Plumwood, R. K. Meyer, and R. T. Brady. 1982. Relevant Logics and Their Rivals. Part. 1. The Basic Philosophical and Semantical Theory. Atascadero: Ridgeview.Search in Google Scholar

Routley/Sylvan, R., and D. Hyde. 1993. “Ubiquitous Vagueness without Embarrassment.” Acta Analytica 10: 7–29. (reproduced in Hyde, D. & Priest, G. 2000. Sociative Logics and Their Applications: Essays by the Late Richard Sylvan, Ashgate, Aldershot, p. 371–390).Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1903. Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. 1977. “Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 23 (203): 74–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0068673500003941.Search in Google Scholar

Sider, Th. 2001. Four Dimensionalism. An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019924443X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Skyrms, B. 1983. “Zeno’s Paradox of Measure.” In Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis. Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, edited by R. S. Cohen, and L. Laudan, 223–54. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_12Search in Google Scholar

Varzi, A. 2007. “Spatial Reasoning and Ontology: Parts, Wholes, and Locations.” In Handbook of Spatial Logics, edited by M. Aiello, I. Pratt-Hartmann, and J. van Benthem, 945–1038. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5587-4_15Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Z. 2021. Paradoxes and Inconsistent Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108993135Search in Google Scholar

Westerhoff, J. 2009. Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka. A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375213.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

White, M. J. 1985. Agency and Integrality. Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility. Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster-Tokyo: Reidel.Search in Google Scholar

White, M. J. 1992. The Continuous and the Discrete. Ancient Physical Theories from a Contemporary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar