Why There is No Us in Consciousness: You Are Simple, a Bodily Soul

References

Bailey, Andrew. 2014. “You Needn’t Be Simple.” Philosophical Papers 43 (2): 145–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2014.932955.Search in Google Scholar

Barnett, David. 2008. “The Simplicity Intuition and its Hidden Influence on Philosophy of Mind.” Noûs 42 (2): 308–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00682.x.Search in Google Scholar

Barnett, David. 2010. “You Are Simple.” In The Waning of Materialism, edited by Robert Koons, and George Bealer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556182.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Bering, Jesse, and David Bjorklund. 2004. “The Natural Emergence of Reasoning About the Afterlife as a Developmental Regularity.” Developmental Psychology 40 (2): 217–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.217.Search in Google Scholar

Bering, Jesse, Carlos Hernandez Blasi, and David Bjorklund. 2005. “The Development of ‘Afterlife’ Beliefs in Religiously and Secularly Schooled Children.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23: 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005x36498.Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, Myles. 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. Translated by M. J. Levett. Indianapolis: Hackett Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 2017. “Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism.” In Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Godehard Brüntrup, and Ludwig Jaskolla, 19–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199359943.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. 2018. “The Meta-Problem of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 25 (9–10): 6–61.Search in Google Scholar

Chisholm, Roderick M. 1979. Person and Object: A Metaphysics Study. Chicago: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Chisholm, Roderick M. 1986. “Self-Profile.” In Roderick Chisholm, edited by Radu J. Bogdan, 3–77. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-017-2919-2_1Search in Google Scholar

Chisholm, Roderick M. 1991. “On the Simplicity of the Soul.” Philosophical Perspectives 5: 167–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214094.Search in Google Scholar

Estes, David, Henry M. Wellman, and Jaqueline Woolley. 1989. “Children’s Understanding of Mental Phenomena.” In Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 22, edited by Hayne Reese. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60412-7Search in Google Scholar

Fine, Kit. 1995. “Part-Whole.” In The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, edited by Barry Smith, and David Woodruff Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521430232.011Search in Google Scholar

Forstmann, M., and P. Burgmer. 2015. “Adults are Intuitive Mind-Body Dualists.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 144: 222–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000045.Search in Google Scholar

Forstmann, M., and P. Burgmer. 2017. “Antecedents, Manifestations, and Consequences of Belief in Mind-Body Dualism.” In The Science of Lay Theories, edited by C. Zedelius, B. Müller, and J. W. Schooler. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_8Search in Google Scholar

Haldane, John. 2010. “Kenny and Aquinas on the Metaphysics of Mind.” In Mind, Method, and Morality: Essays in Honour of Anthony Kenny, edited by John Cottingham, and Peter Hacker, 119–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 1900/1970. Logical Investigations, Vol. 2, Translated, J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Inagaki, K., and G. Hatano. 1991. “Constrained Person Analogy in Young Children’s Biological Inference.” Cognitive Development 6: 219–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(91)90037-e.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, S. 2000. “The Recognition of Mentalistic Agents in Infancy.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 22–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01414-x.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated and edited by Paul Guyer, and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649Search in Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. 1989. The Metaphysics of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. 2013. “Myths of the Mind and Myths of the Brain.” Philosophical Inquiries 1 (1): 63–72.Search in Google Scholar

Knobe, Joshua, and Jesse Prinz. 2008. “Intuitions About Consciousness: Experimental Studies.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7: 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9066-y.Search in Google Scholar

Koons, Robert. 2014. “Staunch vs. Faint-Hearted Hylomorphism: Toward an Aristotelian Account of Composition.” Res Philosophica 91 (2): 151–77. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2014.91.2.1.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhlmeier, V. A., P. Bloom, and K. Wynn. 2004. “Do 5-Month-Old Infants See Humans as Material Objects?” Cognition 94 (1): 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.007.Search in Google Scholar

Lennon, Thomas, and Robert Stainton, eds. 2008. The Achilles of Rationalist Psychology. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6893-5Search in Google Scholar

Madden, Rory. 2015. “The Naïve Topology of the Conscious Subject.” Noûs 49 (1): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12002.Search in Google Scholar

Markosian, Ned. 1998. “Simples.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2): 213–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409812348361.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Raymond, and John Barresi. 2006. The Rise and Fall of Soul and Self. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merricks, Trenton. 2001. Object and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199245363.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mijuskovic, Ben Lazare. 1974. The Achilles of Rationalist Arguments. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-2037-4Search in Google Scholar

Mulligan, Kevin, and Barry Smith. 1985. “Franz Brentano on the Ontology of Mind.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (4): 627–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107571.Search in Google Scholar

Plato. 1997. “Theaetetus.” In Plato: Complete Works, edited, with Introduction and Notes, edited by John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Quinn, Philip L. 1997. “Tiny Selves: Chisholm on the Simplicity of the Soul.” In The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm, edited by Lewis Hahn, 55–67. LaSalle: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Rickabaugh, Brandon. 2019. “Alister McGrath’s Anti-Mind-Body Dualism: Neuroscientific and Philosophical Quandaries for Christian Physicalism.” Trinity Journal 40: 215–40.Search in Google Scholar

Rickabaugh, Brandon. 2020. The Conscious Mind Unified. Waco: Baylor University.Search in Google Scholar

Rickabaugh, Brandon. Forthcoming. Simply Conscious: Unity of Consciousness Contra Materialism and for the Soul. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Rickabaugh, Brandon, and J. P. Moreland. 2023. The Substance of Consciousness: A Comprehensive Defense of Contemporary Substance Dualism. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Sider, Ted. 2003. “Maximality and Microphysical Supervenience.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 139–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00247.x.Search in Google Scholar

Strawson, Galen. 2010. “Fundamental Singleness: How to Turn the 2nd Paralogism into a Valid Argument.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 67: 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1358246110000159.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Richard. 1997. “Chisholm’s Idea of a Person.” In The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm, edited by Lewis Hahn, 45–51. Chicago: Open Court.Search in Google Scholar

Textor, Mark. 2021. The Disappearance of the Soul and the Turn Against Metaphysics: Austrian Philosophy 1874–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198769828.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Unger, Peter. 2004. “The Mental Problems of the Many.” In Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, Vol. 1, edited by Dean Zimmerman, 195–222. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199267729.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

van Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wellman, Henry M., and A. K. Hickling. 1994. “The Minds ‘I’: Children’s Conception of the Mind as an Active Agent.” Child Development 65: 1564–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00836.x.Search in Google Scholar

Willard, Dallas. 1981. “Whole, Parts, and the Objectivity of Knowledge.” In Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, edited by Wolfgang Kllniic, Kevin Mulligan, Gilbert T. Null, Peter M. Simons, Roger A. Simons, Barry Smith, and Dallas Willard, 379–400. Millinchn, Wien: Philosophia Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Willard, Dallas. 1994. “Mereological Essentialism Restricted.” Axiomathes 5 (1): 123–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02228959.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Eric. 2018. “Persons, Simplicity, and Substance.” Philosophical Papers 47 (2): 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2018.1445551.Search in Google Scholar