Startseite Association between MTHFR genetic polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease susceptibility: a meta-analysis
Artikel Open Access

Association between MTHFR genetic polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease susceptibility: a meta-analysis

  • Hong-Mei Diao , Zheng-Feng Song und Hai-Dong Xu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. August 2019

Abstract

Folate metabolism plays quite a critical role in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Previous published research works have studied the link existing between the folate metabolism genetic polymorphisms and PD susceptibility; nevertheless, the results continue having controversies and inconclusiveness. Accordingly, we carried out the present meta-analysis for the assessment of the potential link between the folate metabolism genetic polymorphisms and the susceptibility to PD. In addition we carried out a literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WanFang databases till November 10, 2018. The odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% credible interval (95%CI) were put to use for evaluating the strength of the association of three folate metabolism genetic polymorphism ( C677T, A1298C, and A2756G) with the susceptibility to PD. Each statistical analysis was carried out with the use of STATA 15.0. An aggregate of twenty-one case-control investigations were retrieved, which involved 3,944 PD patients and 4,412 controls. We discovered the existence of no substantial link between the C677T and A1298C polymorphism and PD risk in any genetic framework comparisons. With regard to A2756G polymorphism, we discovered that there was an association between the A2756G genetic polymorphism and an augmented threat of PD in the co-dominant genetic framework (GG vs. AA: OR=1.86, 95%CI=1.02-3.37, P=0.042) and the recessive genetic model (GG vs. GA+AA: OR=1.90, 95%CI=1.06-3.41, P=0.031). To summarize, our research work indicates that the A2756G polymorphism of the folate metabolism gene had an association with an augmented threat of PD. Also, A1298C polymorphisms is unlikely to significantly contribute towards the susceptibility to PD. Further large-scale case-control studies are still required.

1 Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is termed as the second most frequently prevalent neurodegenerative disorder following the Alzheimer’s disease, which impacts approximately 1% of the individuals aged more than 60 across the globe and 4-5% of people aged more than 85 years [1, 2] . Clinically, PD is manifested by the classical motor symptoms, which include not only the tremor, but also the rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability, significantly impacting the patients’ quality of life [2, 3]. These medicinal presentations constitute the results of dopaminergic neuron loss in the substantia nigra, leading the lowered degrees of dopamine in the striatum and disrupted motor control. Despite the fact that the reason leading to the neuronal loss is not clear, more and more evidence has suggested that mitochondrial impairment, endothelial damage, inflammatory process, and oxidative stress are considered as playing key roles when it comes to the selective dopaminergic cell death in the brain of those patients, who have PD [4, 5].

Homocysteine (Hcy) has been observed as enhancing mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, and oxidative stress, together with being a contributing determinant in the pathophysiological process to a number of neurodegenerative diseases that include PD [6, 7]. Hcy is a sulfur-containing amino acid, which is derived from the demethylation of methionine by means of the methionine cycle and the folate cycle [8]. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a folate-reliant enzyme that catalyzes 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. The output is termed as the dominant form of circulating folate, besides providing a methyl group for the re-methylation of Hcy back to methionine [8]. Three common variants (C677T, A1298C, and A2756G) in the MTHFR gene, which lower the function of MTHFR, in addition to further resulting into the metabolic disruption of Hcy, have been indicated as having association with the risk of patients with PD [8, 9].

A number of case-control investigations have explored the potential link that exists between the MTHFR genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to PD, but the findings are still inconclusive [9, 10, 11, 12]. Hence, we carried out the present meta-analysis in order to clarify the link existing between the MTHFR polymorphisms and susceptibility to PD with the use of qualified data attained from the published case-control research works.

2 Materials and methods

The current meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the consensus statement of the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology recommendations [13]. All the analysis was carried out on the basis of previously published works; in this manner, ethical approval and patient consent were not required.

2.1 Identification of eligible studies

A literature search in the PubMed, as well as in the EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WanFang databases was carried out to figure out the eligible studies, and the latest search was updated in November 2018. The terms presented as follows, together with their combinations, were searched: ‘methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase’ OR ‘MTHFR’ AND ‘Parkinson’s disease’ OR ‘PD’ AND ‘polymorphism*’ OR ‘variant*’. Each of the search was constrained to English or Chinese language papers.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion

The qualified research works mandatorily require meeting the inclusion criteria as hereunder: (1) evaluate the link existing between the MTHFR polymorphisms and susceptibility to PD; (2) case-control research design; (3) enough amount of data for the calculation of the odds ratios (ORs), coupled with 95 percent confidence interval (95%CI). The research works were not counted on for any of the following reasons: (1) inadequate amount of information for extracting the data; (2) only case study; (3) case reports, reviews, letters; (4) studies carried out in non-humans, and duplicated publication. For the research works having copied data, the biggest or the latest publication was chosen.

2.3 Data extraction

All data were independently extracted by two investigators in accordance with the above-mentioned inclusion criteria. Moreover, the following information was extracted from all of the research works included: the first author, in addition to the year of publication, country, ethnicity, genotype distributions in cases as well as controls, besides the detection methodology of genotypes. The disagreement existing between scholars were removed through the consultation with a 3rd scholar.

2.4 Statistical analysis

The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was calculated by the Chi-squared test in control groups in all of the research works; the P-value more than 0.001 demonstrated that the population was in genetic equilibrium. Besides that, the odds ratios (ORs) that had 95 percent confidence interval (CI) were adopted for the purpose of calculating the strength of the link between PD susceptibility and the MTHFR polymorphisms. The importance associated with the accumulated OR was investigated in accordance with the Z-test; in addition, P<0.05 was regarded as having statistical significance. The evaluation of the between-study heterogeneity was carried out with the help of the Q-test as well as I2 statistics [14]. Moreover, the application of the fixed-effects framework was made at Ph>0.1 or I2<50% [15]; or else, the random-effects framework was followed [16]. The sensitivity analysis was carried out through the omission of the single research work always for the evaluation of the robustness of the findings. Also, the underlying publication partiality was assessed with the help of the Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s test [17, 18]. All of the statistical analysis was carried out with the use of the STATA version 15.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). A P-value below 0.05 was regarded as having statistical significance.

3 Results

3.1 Study characteristics

The flow chart presented in Figure 1 shed light on the research selection mechanism. An aggregate of 256 papers were figured out by means of the preliminary search of databases. In accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria presented earlier, an aggregate of 21 case-control research works, which involved 3,944 PD patients and 4,412 controls, were included [10, 11, 12, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Among the selected studies, 20 studies involving 3,712 PD patients and 4,167 controls were carried out for the purpose of evaluating MTHFR C677T polymorphism [10, 11, 12, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]; 10 studies were carried out for the assessment of MTHFR A1298C polymorphism with an aggregate of 1,861 PD patients, together with 1,987 controls [12, 19, 23, 24, 25, 27, 31, 33, 34, 36]; 4 research works that contained 541 PD patients as well as 709 controls, were performed for the purpose of evaluating MTHFR A2756G polymorphism [19, 26, 29, 31]. Moreover, the key attributes of all of the investigations and HWE examination results were presented in Table 1. The allocations of the MTHFR genetic mutation in controls were observed as showing consistency with HWE in all studies (P>0.001).

Figure 1 Flow diagram of included and excluded studies.
Figure 1

Flow diagram of included and excluded studies.

Table 1

Main characteristics of included studies in this meta-analysis.

Author Year Country Ethnicity Control Source Sample Size Case Control Genotyping Methods HWE in controls
Dorszewska 2007 Poland Caucasian PB 98 50 PCR-RFLP 0.495
Lin 2007 China Asian PB 94 146 PCR-RFLP 0.410
Yasui 2000 Japan Asian PB 90 53 PCR 0.194
Harmon 1997 Ireland Caucasian PB 188 184 PCR 0.132
Białecka 2012 Poland Caucasian HB 320 254 PCR-RFLP 0.855
Caccamo 2007 Italy Caucasian PB 49 86 PCR 0.376
Camicioli 2009 Canada Caucasian HB 51 49 PCR 0.804
Fong 2011 China Asian HB 211 218 PCR 0.494
Wullner 2005 Germany Caucasian NA 342 342 PCR 0.021
Garcia 2015 Mexico Caucasian PB 140 216 TaqMan 0.118
Gorgone 2012 Italy Caucasian PB 60 82 PCR 0.430
Kumudini 2014 India Asian PB 151 416 PCR-RFLP 0.352
Liao 2014 China Asian PB 765 717 PCR 0.013
Religa 2006 Poland Caucasian HB 114 100 PCR 0.901
Rodriguez-Oroz 2009 Spain Caucasian PB 77 28 PCR-RFLP 0.748
Todorovic 2006 Serbia Caucasian PB 113 53 PCR 0.583
Yuan 2016 China Asian PB 512 512 PCR 0.347
Yuan 2009 China Asian HB 76 110 PCR-RFLP 0.652
Zahra 2016 Malta Caucasian PB 100 311 PCR 0.382
Chao 2014 China Asian HB 161 240 PCR 0.198
Momose 2002 Japan Asian PB 232 245 PCR 0.849
  1. Abbreviations: HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; PCR-RFLP, Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; PB, Population-based; HB, Hospital-based.

3.2 MTHFR C677T and PD Susceptibility

With regard to the MTHFR C677T polymorphism, as revealed by the meta-analysis, there was no statistically significant association in any of the genetic frameworks in the population, in general (Figure 2A). For the stratification in accordance with ethnicity, no substantial link in any of the genetic frameworks in Caucasians or Asians (Figure 2B) was observed. In the meantime, we conducted the stratified analysis in accordance with the source of controls, substantially augmenting the risk of PD discovered in the allelic genetic framework (T vs. C: OR=1.18, 95%CI=1.01-1.39, P=0.043), co-dominant genetic framework (TC vs. CC: OR=1.24, 95%CI=1.02-1.51, P=0.034), and dominant genetic framework (TT+TC vs. CC: OR=1.27, 95%CI=1.03-1.55, P=0.023) in the hospital-based study (Figure 2C and 2D). Table 2 summarizes the meta-analysis findings between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and PD susceptibility.

Figure 2 Forest plot of the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and PD susceptibility: (A) allelic genetic model in the overall populations; (B) allelic genetic model, stratified by ethnicity; (C) allelic and (D) co-dominant genetic model, stratified by source of control.
Figure 2

Forest plot of the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and PD susceptibility: (A) allelic genetic model in the overall populations; (B) allelic genetic model, stratified by ethnicity; (C) allelic and (D) co-dominant genetic model, stratified by source of control.

Table 2

Summary ORs and 95%CI of the association between C677T polymorphism and Parkinson disease susceptibility.

Genetic models Study subjects No. of studies OR (95%CI) p-meta Test of heterogeneity
I2 (%) p-value Model Test of Egger’s
T vs. C Overall 20 1.07(0.94-1.22) 0.297 66.5 <0.001 R 0.206
Asian 8 1.08(0.89-1.32) 0.429 71.8 0.001 R
Caucasian 12 1.06(0.89-1.27) 0.497 61.0 0.003 R
PB 13 1.03(0.86-1.22) 0.781 69.6 <0.001 R
HB 6 1.18(1.01-1.39) 0.043 22.5 0.265 R
TC vs. CC Overall 20 1.06(0.90-1.25) 0.494 56.3 0.001 R 0.581
Asian 8 1.06(0.81-1.40) 0.676 70.9 0.001 R
Caucasian 12 1.09(0.90-1.30) 0.377 23.4 0.213 R
PB 13 0.93(0.76-1.14) 0.491 48.6 0.025 F
HB 6 1.24(1.02-1.51) 0.034 0 0.426 F
TT vs. CC Overall 20 1.08(0.83-1.42) 0.567 58.6 0.001 R 0.064
Asian 8 1.07(0.74-1.54) 0.719 53.9 0.034 R
Caucasian 12 1.05(0.70-1.57) 0.812 62.3 0.002 R
PB 13 1.03(0.70-1.52) 0.878 66.3 <0.001 R
HB 6 1.30(0.96-1.77) 0.094 0 0.469 R
TT+TC vs. CC Overall 20 1.08(0.91-1.29) 0.386 64.6 <0.001 R 0.075
Asian 8 1.09(0.82-1.45) 0.547 75.3 <0.001 R
Caucasian 12 1.09(0.88-1.34) 0.442 45.0 0.045 R
PB 13 0.98(0.78-1.22) 0.842 63.5 0.001 R
HB 6 1.27(1.03-1.55) 0.023 11.5 0.342 R
TT vs. CC+CT Overall 20 1.06(0.86-1.30) 0.942 43.3 0.021 F 0.186
Asian 8 0.99(0.79-1.24) 0.926 15.5 0.308 R
Caucasian 12 1.04(0.74-1.47) 0.814 55.9 0.009 R
PB 13 1.07(0.78-1.45) 0.690 56.6 0.006 R
HB 6 1.17(0.88-1.54) 0.283 0 0.557 R
  1. Abbreviations: Bold values indicate statistically significant results; OR, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; p-meta, p-value of pooled effect; R, Random-effect model; F, Fixed-effect model;

3.3 MTHFR A1298C and PD Susceptibility

With regard to MTHFR A1298C polymorphism, the findings, on the basis of all of the involved research works, did not provide any proof of a link between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and PD risk in any of the genetic framework in the population, in general (Figure 3A). For the stratified analysis in accordance with ethnicity, no substantial link in any genetic models in Caucasians or Asians (Figure 3B) was discovered. In the subgroup analysis in accordance with the source of controls, the significantly augmented susceptibility of PD was discovered in the allelic genetic framework (C vs. A: OR=1.17, 95%CI=1.02-1.35, P=0.029), co-dominant genetic model (CA vs. AA: OR=1.25, 95%CI=1.04-1.51, P=0.016), and dominant genetic model (TT+TC vs. CC: OR=1.25, 95%CI=1.05-1.49, P=0.014) in the population-based study (Figure 3C and 3D). Table 3 provides the summary of the findings of comparisons.

Figure 3 Forest plot of the association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and PD susceptibility: (A) allelic genetic model in the overall populations; (B) allelic genetic model, stratified by ethnicity; (C) allelic and (D) co-dominant genetic model, stratified by source of control.
Figure 3

Forest plot of the association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and PD susceptibility: (A) allelic genetic model in the overall populations; (B) allelic genetic model, stratified by ethnicity; (C) allelic and (D) co-dominant genetic model, stratified by source of control.

Table 3

Summary ORs and 95%CI of the association between A1298C polymorphism and Parkinson disease susceptibility.

Genetic models Study subjects No. of studies OR (95%CI) p-meta Test of heterogeneity Test of Egger’s
I2 (%) p-value Model
C vs. A Overall 10 1.02(0.92-1.14) 0.652 26.4 0.201 F 0.275
Asian 3 1.15(0.97-1.36) 0.115 0 0.631 F
Caucasian 7 0.96(0.84-1.09) 0.503 29.7 0.201 F
PB 6 1.17(1.02-1.35) 0.029 0 0.869 F
HB 3 0.93(0.75-1.15) 0.515 10.3 0.328 F
CA vs. AA Overall 10 1.11(0.97-1.28) 0.144 0 0.608 F 0.499
Asian 3 1.17(0.95-1.45) 0.131 0 0.638 F
Caucasian 7 1.06(0.88-1.28) 0.542 0 0.439 F
PB 6 1.25(1.04-1.51) 0.016 0 0.738 F
HB 3 0.95(0.71-1.26) 0.703 0 0.734 F
CC vs. AA Overall 10 0.93(0.72-1.19) 0.557 0 0.491 F 0.121
Asian 3 1.21(0.75-1.94) 0.437 0 0.830 F
Caucasian 7 0.83(0.62-1.13) 0.237 5.4 0.386 F
PB 6 1.24(0.86-1.79) 0.251 0 0.975 F
HB 3 0.85(0.52-1.40) 0.527 6.1 0.345 F
CC+CA vs. AA Overall 10 1.08(0.95-1.23) 0.261 11.5 0.337 F 0.378
Asian 3 1.18(0.97-1.44) 0.107 0 0.611 F
Caucasian 7 1.01(0.84-1.20) 0.942 23.4 0.250 F
PB 6 1.25(1.05-1.49) 0.014 0 0.757 F
HB 3 0.93(0.71-1.22) 0.603 0 0.505 F
CC vs. AA+AC Overall 10 0.88(0.69-1.12) 0.310 0 0.726 F 0.095
Asian 3 1.15(0.72-1.84) 0.561 0 0.873 F
Caucasian 7 0.80(0.60-1.06) 0.124 0 0.656 F
PB 6 1.09(0.76-1.54) 0.642 0 0.973 F
HB 3 0.87(0.54-1.41) 0.574 0 0.427 F
  1. Abbreviations: Bold values indicate statistically significant results; OR, Odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; p-meta, p-value of pooled effect; R, Random-effect model; F, Fixed-effect model; NA, Not available.

3.4 MTHFR A2756G and PD Susceptibility

In terms of MTHFR A2756G polymorphism, there was statistically significant association discovered in the co-dominant genetic model (GG vs. AA: OR=1.86, 95%CI=1.02-3.37, P=0.042) and recessive genetic model (GG vs. AA+AG: OR=1.90, 95%CI=1.06-3.41, P=0.031) in the overall population (Figure 4A and 4B). With regard to the subgroup analysis in accordance with ethnicity, we found no substantial link in any genetic models in Caucasians or Asians. Additionally, in the subgroup analysis in accordance with the source of controls, MTHFR A2756G polymorphism was found to be linked to the increased susceptibility of PD in the co-dominant genetic model (GG vs. AA: OR=2.22, 95%CI=1.10-4.49, P=0.027) and recessive genetic model (GG vs. AA+AG: OR=2.29, 95%CI=1.15-4.56, P=0.018) in the population-based study (Figure 4C and 4D). Table 4 presents the summary findings of comparisons.

Figure 4 Forest plot of the association between MTHFR A2756G polymorphism and PD susceptibility: (A) co-dominant and (B) recessive genetic model in the overall populations; (C) co-dominant and (D) recessive genetic model, stratified by source of control.
Figure 4

Forest plot of the association between MTHFR A2756G polymorphism and PD susceptibility: (A) co-dominant and (B) recessive genetic model in the overall populations; (C) co-dominant and (D) recessive genetic model, stratified by source of control.

Table 4

Summary ORs and 95%CI of the association between A2756G polymorphism and Parkinson disease susceptibility.

Genetic models Study subjects No. of studies OR (95%CI) p-meta Test of heterogeneity Test of Egger’s
I2 (%) p-value Model
G vs. A Overall 4 1.09(0.90-1.33) 0.373 0 0.699 F 0.748
Asian 2 1.09(0.88-1.35) 0.428 0 0.687 F
Caucasian 2 1.11(0.68-1.79) 0.683 21.0 0.260 F
PB 3 1.13(0.88-1.44) 0.343 0 0.527 F
HB 1 1.04(0.75-1.44) 0.818 NA NA F
GA vs. AA Overall 4 0.96(0.75-1.23) 0.742 0 0.943 F 0.406
Asian 2 0.97(0.74-1.28) 0.852 0 0.747 F
Caucasian 2 0.90(0.51-1.59) 0.711 0 0.642 F
PB 3 0.92(0.67-1.27) 0.614 0 0.892 F
HB 1 1.02(0.69-1.51) 0.921 NA NA F
GG vs. AA Overall 4 1.86(1.02-3.37) 0.042 0 0.525 F 0.943
Asian 2 1.76(0.93-3.32) 0.084 0 0.408 F
Caucasian 2 2.53(0.45-14.21) 0.292 40.3 0.195 F
PB 3 2.22(1.10-4.49) 0.027 0 0.450 F
HB 1 1.20(0.39-3.69) 0.744 NA NA F
GG+GA vs. AA Overall 4 1.02(0.80-1.30) 0.856 11.5 0.887 F 0.582
Asian 2 1.03(0.79-1.35) 0.827 0 0.987 F
Caucasian 2 0.99(0.57-1.73) 0.972 23.4 0.430 F
PB 3 1.02(0.75-1.38) 0.919 0 0.727 F
HB 1 1.03(0.70-1.52) 0.870 NA NA F
GG vs. AA+AG Overall 4 1.90(1.06-3.41) 0.031 0 0.518 F 0.933
Asian 2 1.79(0.96-3.35) 0.066 0 0.366 F
Caucasian 2 2.62(0.47-14.66) 0.274 36.7 0.209 F
PB 3 2.29(1.15-4.56) 0.018 0 0.472 F
HB 1 1.20(0.39-3.62) 0.752 NA NA F
  1. [4]

3.5 Sensitivity analysis

For the purpose of assessing the stability of the findings of the meta-analysis, we carried out a sensitivity analysis with the help of the sequentially excluded separate research works. The results, having statistical similarity, were attained subsequent to the sequential exclusion of all studies (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Sensitivity analysis of studies on MTHFR genetic polymorphism and PD: (A) allelic and (B) co-dominant genetic model for C677T polymorphism; (C) allelic genetic model for A1298C polymorphism; (D) allelic genetic model for A2756G polymorphism.
Figure 5

Sensitivity analysis of studies on MTHFR genetic polymorphism and PD: (A) allelic and (B) co-dominant genetic model for C677T polymorphism; (C) allelic genetic model for A1298C polymorphism; (D) allelic genetic model for A2756G polymorphism.

3.6 Publication bias

The evaluation of the publication bias was carried out in accordance with the Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s test. None of the shapes of the funnel plots indicated any proof of significant asymmetry (Figure 6). Nevertheless, the Egger’s test yielded no proof suggesting publication bias. Moreover, the key results as presented in Table 2, Table 3, 4.

Figure 6 Begg’s funnel plots of publication bias for the association between MTHFR genetic polymorphism and PD: (A) allelic and (B) co-dominant genetic model for C677T polymorphism; (C) allelic and (D) co-dominant genetic model for A1298C polymorphism.
Figure 6

Begg’s funnel plots of publication bias for the association between MTHFR genetic polymorphism and PD: (A) allelic and (B) co-dominant genetic model for C677T polymorphism; (C) allelic and (D) co-dominant genetic model for A1298C polymorphism.

4 Discussion

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is termed as a frequently found neurodegenerative illness that symptoms worsened gradually, ultimately impacting the quality of life of patients. As fully acknowledged, PD is termed as a multifactorial illness, which is a result of intricate gene-gene and gene-environment contacts [37]. Even though the therapy steps have advanced continuously for controlling symptoms, so far no methodology exists for the prevention of the incidence of PD. The latest observations have shed light on the involving homocysteine (Hcy) in the pathogenesis of PD [6, 8, 38]. There are some research works that have discovered an augmented incidence of the illness in those subjects, who carry the MTHFR genotype and identified a major role for Hcy in the promotion of the susceptibility and growth of PD; on the other hand, other research works reached the contrary conclusion [11, 12, 24, 26, 34].

The MTHFR gene is located on chromosome 1p36.3 spanning more than 20 kb and containing a noncoding exon as well as 11 coding exons [39]. In addition, the encoded enzyme catalyzes the conversion of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate, a carbon donor in nucleotide biosynthesis, to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, the key form of circulatory folate, together with providing a methyl group for the re-methylation of Hcy back to methionine [8]. Genetic mutations in the MTHFR gene have the potential to causing the autosomal recessive homocystinuria because of the MTHFR shortage. In addition, gene variants have been extensively studied in lots of illness, which also include PD.

Even though the augmented number of case-control research works studied the link between MTHFR genetic polymorphism and PD risk; however, the findings remain controversial. In the year 2014, a large case-control study by Liao was conducted for the purpose of investigating the function of the MTHFR genetic polymorphism in PD susceptibility and the results demonstrated that the MTHFR C677T genetic polymorphism had an association with the decreased PD susceptibility [26]. Fong et al. carried out study for the discovery of the link of MTHFR genetic polymorphism with PD susceptibility; the results shed light on the fact that the augmented PD susceptibility is expected to have more significance in the carriers that have the polymorphisms of MTHFR gene [26].

The present meta-analysis is carried out on the basis of the systematic review, which follows the PRISMA guidelines. The robustness of a systematic review involves including the papers that are not based on the selection of authors but the number of papers retrieved from electronic databases. That is why it depends not only on the quality but also the specimen size of investigations involved in the systematic review. Furthermore, a meta-analysis is termed as a methodology pooling the effect sizes of the current scientific literature. A meta-analysis can be carried out on two or more papers. Therefore, it is of great significance to perform a meta-analysis of all of the qualified research works for the clarification of the impacts of the MTHFR genetic polymorphism with PD susceptibility. As illustrated by the current meta-analysis, the A2756G polymorphism in MTHFR gene had an association with an increased risk of PD. However, the C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are not likely to perform a significant function in the risk to PD. Moreover, the meta-analysis carried out by Liu et al. in the year 2018 demonstrated that MTHFR (C677T and A1298C) polymorphism is likely to have an association with the augmented PD susceptibility, which was different from our result [40].

The possible constraints of the meta-analysis require consideration. At first, the specimen in this meta-analysis was small in size, which was likely to give rise to the partiality of the findings in the course of the evaluation of the link between MTHFR genetic polymorphisms and risk to PD. Second, the genuine data in some of the research works was deficient that was likely to constrain enough statistical power for the evaluation of the underlying impacts of gene-gene and gene-environment contacts on the growth of PD. Third, the meta-analysis just counts on the research works that were published in English or Chinese that are likely to give rise to the selection partiality in the accumulated findings. Fourthly, a substantial difference exists in numbers between PD cases and controls that is likely to exert an influence on the dependability of our findings. Based on the above reasons, the pooled estimates of our meta-analysis require careful interpretation.

To conclude, the current meta-analysis illustrated the fact that the MTHFR A2756G genetic polymorphism confers susceptibility to PD, but no link was observed to exist between the C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and PD susceptibility. More efficiently formulated investigations, which have larger specimens, are required for the purpose of clarifying the link of the MTHFR genetic polymorphism with PD risk.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no existence of any conflicting interest.

References

[1] de Lau LM, Breteler MM. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:525-53510.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Elbaz A, Carcaillon L, Kab S, Moisan F. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016;172:14-2610.1016/j.neurol.2015.09.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Berganzo K, Tijero B, Gonzalez-Eizaguirre A, et al. Motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease and their impact on quality of life and on different clinical subgroups. Neurologia. 2016;31:585-59110.1016/j.nrleng.2014.10.016Suche in Google Scholar

[4] reenamyre JT, Hastings TG. Biomedicine. Parkinson’s--divergent causes, convergent mechanisms. Science. 2004;304:1120-112210.1126/science.1098966Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Tiwari PC, Pal R. The potential role of neuroinflammation and transcription factors in Parkinson disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2017;19:71-8010.31887/DCNS.2017.19.1/rpalSuche in Google Scholar

[6] Bonetti F, Brombo G, Zuliani G. The relationship between hyperhomocysteinemia and neurodegeneration. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2016;6:133-14510.2217/nmt-2015-0008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Kruman, II, Culmsee C, Chan SL, et al. Homocysteine elicits a DNA damage response in neurons that promotes apoptosis and hypersensitivity to excitotoxicity. J Neurosci. 2000;20(18):6920-692610.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-18-06920.2000Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Moretti R, Caruso P. The Controversial Role of Homocysteine in Neurology: From Labs to Clinical Practice. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20. pii: E23110.3390/ijms20010231Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] de Lau LM, Koudstaal PJ, van Meurs JB, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T genotype and PD. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:927-93010.1002/ana.20509Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Gorgone G, Curro M, Ferlazzo N, et al. Coenzyme Q10, hyperhomocysteinemia and MTHFR C677T polymorphism in levodopa-treated Parkinson’s disease patients. Neuromolecular Med. 2012;14:84-9010.1007/s12017-012-8174-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Liao Q, Li NN, Mao XY, et al. MTHFR C677T variant reduces risk of sporadic Parkinson’s disease in ethnic Chinese. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130:e30-3410.1111/ane.12245Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Yuan L, Song Z, Deng X, Xiong W, Yang Z, Deng H. Association of the MTHFR rs1801131 and rs1801133 variants in sporadic Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurosci Lett. 2016;616:26-3110.1016/j.neulet.2016.01.031Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008-201210.1001/jama.283.15.2008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Zintzaras E, Ioannidis JP. HEGESMA: genome search meta-analysis and heterogeneity testing. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3672-367310.1093/bioinformatics/bti536Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719-748Suche in Google Scholar

[16] DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45:139-14510.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50:1088-110110.2307/2533446Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629-63410.1136/bmj.315.7109.629Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Dorszewska J1, Florczak J, Rozycka A, et al. Oxidative DNA damage and level of thiols as related to polymorphisms of MTHFR, MTR, MTHFD1 in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2007;67:113-12910.55782/ane-2007-1639Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Lin JJ, Yueh KC, Liu CS, Liu JT, Lin SZ. 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T gene polymorphism can influence age at onset of Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2007;16:150-157Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Yasui K, Kowa H, Nakaso K, et al. Plasma homocysteine and MTHFR C677T genotype in levodopa-treated patients with PD. Neurology. 2000;55:437-44010.1212/WNL.55.3.437Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Harmon DL, Ramsbottom D, Whitehead AS, et al. The thermolabile variant of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase is not associated with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62:67110.1136/jnnp.62.6.671Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[23] Bialecka M, Kurzawski M, Roszmann A, et al. Association of COMT, MTHFR, and SLC19A1(RFC-1) polymorphisms with homocysteine blood levels and cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22:716-72410.1097/FPC.0b013e32835693f7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Caccamo D, Gorgone G, Currò M, et al. Effect of MTHFR Polymorphisms on Hyperhomocysteinemia in Levodopa-treated Parkinsonian Patients. Neuromolecular Med. 2007;9:249-25410.1007/s12017-007-8006-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Camicioli RM, Bouchard TP, Somerville MJ. Homocysteine is not associated with global motor or cognitive measures in nondemented older Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord. 2009;24:176-18210.1002/mds.22227Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Fong CS, Shyu HY, Shieh JC, et al. Association of MTHFR, MTR, and MTRR polymorphisms with Parkinson’s disease among ethnic Chinese in Taiwan. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:332-33810.1016/j.cca.2010.11.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Fregni F, DaSilva D, Potvin K, et al. Treatment of chronic visceral pain with brain stimulation. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:971-97210.1002/ana.20651Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] García S, Coral-Vázquez RM, Gallegos-Arreola MP, et al. Association of the rs1801133 variant in the MTHFR gene and sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Folia Neuropathol. 2015;53:24-2810.5114/fn.2015.49971Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Kumudini N, Uma A, Naushad SM, Mridula R, Borgohain R, Kutala VK. Association of seven functional polymorphisms of one-carbon metabolic pathway with total plasma homocysteine levels and susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease among South Indians. Neurosci Lett. 2014;568:1-510.1016/j.neulet.2014.03.044Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Religa D, Czyzewski K, Styczynska M, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2006;404:56-6010.1016/j.neulet.2006.05.040Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Lage PM, Sanchez-Mut J, et al. Homocysteine and cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a biochemical, neuroimaging, and genetic study. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1437-144410.1002/mds.22522Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Todorović Z, Džoljić E, Novaković I, et al. Homocysteine serum levels and MTHFR C677T genotype in patients with Parkinson’s disease, with and without levodopa therapy. J Neurol Sci. 2006;248:56-6110.1016/j.jns.2006.05.040Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Yuan R-Y, Sheu J-J, Yu J-M, et al. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and plasma homocysteine in levodopa-treated and non-treated Parkinson’s disease patients. J Neurol Sci. 2009;287:64-6810.1016/j.jns.2009.09.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Zahra C, Tabone C, Camilleri G, Felice AE, Farrugia R, Bezzina Wettinger S. Genetic causes of Parkinson’s disease in the Maltese: a study of selected mutations in LRRK2, MTHFR, QDPR and SPR. BMC Med Genet. 2016; 17: 6510.1186/s12881-016-0327-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Ning C, Liang S, Hui-Yan Y, et al. Association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene C677T polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease combined with hyperhomocysteinemia. Chin J Geriatr. 2014; 33: 121-125Suche in Google Scholar

[36] Momose Y, Murata M, Kobayashi K, et al. Association studies of multiple candidate genes for Parkinson’s disease using single nucleotide polymorphisms. Ann Neurol. 2002;51:133-13610.1002/ana.10079Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Warner TT, Schapira AH. Genetic and environmental factors in the cause of Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:S16-23; discussion S23-2510.1002/ana.10487Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Sharma M, Tiwari M, Tiwari RK. Hyperhomocysteinemia: Impact on Neurodegenerative Diseases. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;117:287-29610.1111/bcpt.12424Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Prasad AN, Rupar CA, Prasad C. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) deficiency and infantile epilepsy. Brain Dev. 2011;33:758-76910.1016/j.braindev.2011.05.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] Liu L, Zhang L, Guo L, et al. MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms may contribute to the risk of Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis of 19 studies. Neurosci Lett. 2018;662:339-34510.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.060Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-05-13
Accepted: 2019-06-27
Published Online: 2019-08-17

© 2019 Hong-Mei Diao et al. published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Article
  2. Prostate Cancer-Specific of DD3-driven oncolytic virus-harboring mK5 gene
  3. Case Report
  4. Pediatric acute paradoxical cerebral embolism with pulmonary embolism caused by extremely small patent foramen ovale
  5. Research Article
  6. Associations between ambient temperature and acute myocardial infarction
  7. Case Report
  8. Discontinuation of imatinib mesylate could improve renal impairment in chronic myeloid leukemia
  9. Research Article
  10. METTL3 promotes the proliferation and mobility of gastric cancer cells
  11. The C677T polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene and susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer’s disease
  12. microRNA-1236-3p regulates DDP resistance in lung cancer cells
  13. Review Article
  14. The link between thyroid autoimmunity, depression and bipolar disorder
  15. Research Article
  16. Effects of miR-107 on the Chemo-drug sensitivity of breast cancer cells
  17. Analysis of pH dose-dependent growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria
  18. Review Article
  19. Musculoskeletal clinical and imaging manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases
  20. Research Article
  21. Regional hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer
  22. Analysis of hormone receptor status in primary and recurrent breast cancer via data mining pathology reports
  23. Morphological and isokinetic strength differences: bilateral and ipsilateral variation by different sport activity
  24. The reliability of adjusting stepped care based on FeNO monitoring for patients with chronic persistent asthma
  25. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of two physiological ischemic training methods in patients with coronary heart disease
  26. Analysis of ticagrelor’s cardio-protective effects on patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome accompanied with diabetes
  27. Computed tomography findings in patients with Samter’s Triad: an observational study
  28. Case Report
  29. A spinal subdural hematoma induced by guidewire-based lumbar drainage in a patient with ruptured intracranial aneurysms
  30. Research Article
  31. High expression B3GAT3 is related with poor prognosis of liver cancer
  32. Effects of light touch on balance in patients with stroke
  33. Oncoprotein LAMTOR5 activates GLUT1 via upregulating NF-κB in liver cancer
  34. Effects of budesonide combined with noninvasive ventilation on PCT, sTREM-1, chest lung compliance, humoral immune function and quality of life in patients with AECOPD complicated with type II respiratory failure
  35. Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in ovarian cancer
  36. Case Report
  37. Brainstem anaesthesia after retrobulbar block
  38. Review Article
  39. Treating infertility: current affairs of cross-border reproductive care
  40. Research Article
  41. Serum inflammatory cytokines comparison in gastric cancer therapy
  42. Behavioural and psychological symptoms in neurocognitive disorders: Specific patterns in dementia subtypes
  43. MRI and bone scintigraphy for breast cancer bone metastase: a meta-analysis
  44. Comparative study of back propagation artificial neural networks and logistic regression model in predicting poor prognosis after acute ischemic stroke
  45. Analysis of the factors affecting the prognosis of glioma patients
  46. Compare fuhrman nuclear and chromophobe tumor grade on chromophobe RCC
  47. Case Report
  48. Signet ring B cell lymphoma: A potential diagnostic pitfall
  49. Research Article
  50. Subparaneural injection in popliteal sciatic nerve blocks evaluated by MRI
  51. Loneliness in the context of quality of life of nursing home residents
  52. Biological characteristics of cervical precancerous cell proliferation
  53. Effects of Rehabilitation in Bankart Lesion in Non-athletes: A report of three cases
  54. Management of complications of first instance of hepatic trauma in a liver surgery unit: Portal vein ligation as a conservative therapeutic strategy
  55. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 knockdown suppresses the proliferation of HepG2 and Huh7 cells and enhances the cisplatin effect
  56. Comparison of laparoscopy and open radical nephrectomy of renal cell cancer
  57. Case Report
  58. A severe complication of myocardial dysfunction post radiofrequency ablation treatment of huge hepatic hemangioma: a case report and literature review
  59. Solar urticaria, a disease with many dark sides: is omalizumab the right therapeutic response? Reflections from a clinical case report
  60. Research Article
  61. Binge eating disorder and related features in bariatric surgery candidates
  62. Propofol versus 4-hydroxybutyric acid in pediatric cardiac catheterizations
  63. Nasointestinal tube in mechanical ventilation patients is more advantageous
  64. The change of endotracheal tube cuff pressure during laparoscopic surgery
  65. Correlation between iPTH levels on the first postoperative day after total thyroidectomy and permanent hypoparathyroidism: our experience
  66. Case Report
  67. Primary angiosarcoma of the kidney: case report and comprehensive literature review
  68. Research Article
  69. miR-107 enhances the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel
  70. Incidental findings in dental radiology are concerning for family doctors
  71. Suffering from cerebral small vessel disease with and without metabolic syndrome
  72. A meta-analysis of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
  73. Indications and outcomes of splenectomy for hematological disorders
  74. Expression of CENPE and its prognostic role in non-small cell lung cancer
  75. Barbed suture and gastrointestinal surgery. A retrospective analysis
  76. Using post transplant 1 week Tc-99m DTPA renal scan as another method for predicting renal graft failure
  77. The pseudogene PTTG3P promotes cell migration and invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
  78. Lymph node ratio versus TNM system as prognostic factor in colorectal cancer staging. A single Center experience
  79. Review Article
  80. Minimally invasive pilonidal sinus treatment: A narrative review
  81. Research Article
  82. Anatomical workspace study of Endonasal Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Approach
  83. Hounsfield Units on Lumbar Computed Tomography for Predicting Regional Bone Mineral Density
  84. Communication
  85. Aspirin, a potential GLUT1 inhibitor in a vascular endothelial cell line
  86. Research Article
  87. Osteopontin and fatty acid binding protein in ifosfamide-treated rats
  88. Familial polyposis coli: the management of desmoid tumor bleeding
  89. microRNA-27a-3p down-regulation inhibits malignant biological behaviors of ovarian cancer by targeting BTG1
  90. PYCR1 is associated with papillary renal cell carcinoma progression
  91. Prediction of recurrence-associated death from localized prostate cancer with a charlson comorbidity index–reinforced machine learning model
  92. Colorectal cancer in the elderly patient: the role of neo-adjuvant therapy
  93. Association between MTHFR genetic polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease susceptibility: a meta-analysis
  94. Metformin can alleviate the symptom of patient with diabetic nephropathy through reducing the serum level of Hcy and IL-33
  95. Case Report
  96. Severe craniofacial trauma after multiple pistol shots
  97. Research Article
  98. Echocardiography evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in elderly women with metabolic syndrome
  99. Tailored surgery in inguinal hernia repair. The role of subarachnoid anesthesia: a retrospective study
  100. The factors affecting early death in newly diagnosed APL patients
  101. Review Article
  102. Oncological outcomes and quality of life after rectal cancer surgery
  103. Research Article
  104. MiR-638 repressed vascular smooth muscle cell glycolysis by targeting LDHA
  105. microRNA-16 via Twist1 inhibits EMT induced by PM2.5 exposure in human hepatocellular carcinoma
  106. Analyzing the semantic space of the Hippocratic Oath
  107. Fournier’s gangrene and intravenous drug abuse: an unusual case report and review of the literature
  108. Evaluation of surgical site infection in mini-invasive urological surgery
  109. Dihydromyricetin attenuates inflammation through TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway
  110. Clinico-pathological features of colon cancer patients undergoing emergency surgery: a comparison between elderly and non-elderly patients
  111. Case Report
  112. Appendix bleeding with painless bloody diarrhea: A case report and literature review
  113. Research Article
  114. Protective effects of specneuzhenide on renal injury in rats with diabetic nephropathy
  115. PBF, a proto-oncogene in esophageal carcinoma
  116. Use of rituximab in NHL malt type pregnant in I° trimester for two times
  117. Cancer- and non-cancer related chronic pain: from the physiopathological basics to management
  118. Case report
  119. Non-surgical removal of dens invaginatus in maxillary lateral incisor using CBCT: Two-year follow-up case report
  120. Research Article
  121. Risk factors and drug resistance of the MDR Acinetobacter baumannii in pneumonia patients in ICU
  122. Accuracy of tumor perfusion assessment in Rat C6 gliomas model with USPIO
  123. Lemann Index for Assessment of Crohn’s Disease: Correlation with the Quality of Life, Endoscopic Disease activity, Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity and C- Reactive Protein
  124. Case report
  125. Münchausen syndrome as an unusual cause of pseudo-resistant hypertension: a case report
  126. Research Article
  127. Renal artery embolization before radical nephrectomy for complex renal tumour: which are the true advantages?
  128. Prognostic significance of CD276 in non-small cell lung cancer
  129. Potential drug-drug interactions in acute ischemic stroke patients at the Neurological Intensive Care Unit
  130. Effect of vitamin D3 on lung damage induced by cigarette smoke in mice
  131. CircRNA-UCK2 increased TET1 inhibits proliferation and invasion of prostate cancer cells via sponge miRNA-767-5p
  132. Case report
  133. Partial hydatidiform mole and coexistent live fetus: a case report and review of the literature
  134. Research Article
  135. Effect of NGR1 on the atopic dermatitis model and its mechanisms
  136. Clinical features of infertile men carrying a chromosome 9 translocation
  137. Review Article
  138. Expression and role of microRNA-663b in childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia and its mechanism
  139. Case Report
  140. Mature cystic teratoma of the pancreas: A rare cystic neoplasm
  141. Research Article
  142. Application of exercised-based pre-rehabilitation in perioperative period of patients with gastric cancer
  143. Case Report
  144. Predictive factors of intestinal necrosis in acute mesenteric ischemia
  145. Research Article
  146. Application of exercised-based pre-rehabilitation in perioperative period of patients with gastric cancer
  147. Effects of dexmedetomidine on the RhoA /ROCK/ Nox4 signaling pathway in renal fibrosis of diabetic rats
  148. MicroRNA-181a-5p regulates inflammatory response of macrophages in sepsis
  149. Intraventricular pressure in non-communicating hydrocephalus patients before endoscopic third ventriculostomy
  150. CyclinD1 is a new target gene of tumor suppressor miR-520e in breast cancer
  151. CHL1 and NrCAM are primarily expressed in low grade pediatric neuroblastoma
  152. Epidemiological characteristics of postoperative sepsis
  153. Association between unstable angina and CXCL17: a new potential biomarker
  154. Cardiac strains as a tool for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-responders: a pilot study
  155. Case Report
  156. Resuscitation following a bupivacaine injection for a cervical paravertebral block
  157. Research Article
  158. CGF treatment of leg ulcers: A randomized controlled trial
  159. Surgical versus sequential hybrid treatment of carotid body tumors
Heruntergeladen am 28.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2019-0069/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen