Startseite Barriers perceived by nurses in the optimal treatment of postoperative pain
Artikel Open Access

Barriers perceived by nurses in the optimal treatment of postoperative pain

  • Wioletta Medrzycka-Dabrowka EMAIL logo , Sebastian Dąbrowski , Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka , Aleksandra Gawroska-Krzemińska und Dorota Ozga
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. August 2017

Abstract

It is currently estimated that the lack of adequate pain management affects 80% of the global population and the phenomenon poses a serious problem in more than 150 countries. On a national level, the greatest burden of inadequate treatment is borne, among others, by elderly patients. The purpose of the paper was to compare the prevalence of barriers to optimum post-operative pain management in elderly patients, observed by nurses in a clinical, provincial and municipal hospital in Poland. The research project was a multi-center one and took over a year. The study was questionnaire-based. It used the Polish version of the Nurses’ Perceived Obstacles to Pain Assessment and Management Practices questionnaire. The study included a total of 1602 nurses working at a clinical, provincial and municipal hospital.

In the university hospital, difficulties in pain assessment related to the healthcare system occurred statistically significantly more often.

1 Introduction

Correct management of pain is obligatory to help patients improve swiftly during immediate postoperative period. The lack of prompt assessment and management may trigger postoperative complications and lengthen hospital stays. Nurses play a critical role in assessing postoperative pain, regardless of recent developments in nursing care, there is evidence suggesting that patients still experience substantial postoperative pain [1-3]. Adequate postoperative pain management results in easy and early mobilization, shortened hospitalization, patient satisfaction and lower hospital costs [4, 5].

Postoperative pain assessment and management can be successful if well planned, delivered in a consistent, evidence-based way and based on patients’ assessment of their own pain on every occasion. It is multifactorial and no two patients with similar treatment procedures experience same pain, hence, nurses need to be alert to this possibility. Pain can be considered as the fifth vital sign and protocols, team work, and regular pain evaluations are needed to reinforce postoperative pain management [6-9]. There are many barriers that influence the delivery of effective pain management these might be healthcare professional-related, system-related, or patient-related [4].

The purpose of the paper was to compare the prevalence of barriers to optimum post-operative pain management in elderly patients.

2 Methods

2.1 Design and data collection

A mixed method, a descriptive exploratory survey and a qualitative content analysis, were used to describe Polish nurses perceived of barriers to postoperative pain in older adults.

Hospital director was asked for permission to collect data in his/her organization, and to provide a letter of permission to collect data. Twenty-five hospitals were randomly selected for the study; however, only eleven hospitals agreed to participate in this study. The head nurse (or the coordinator) distributed the questionnaires to nurses. Time commitment was anticipated at 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire. The head nurse was to collect all questionnaires and then send them back to the researcher in a sealed envelope within two weeks after receiving the questionnaires.

The study was carried out upon the approval of the study protocol by the Independent Bioethics Committee for Scientific Research of the Medical University of Gdańsk.

2.2 Participants

The data were collected at multiple sites for over one year. A total of 2000 nurses working on surgical wards participated in the study. The respondents were informed that the study was anonymous and that the data collected would be used exclusively for scientific purposes. Participation in the study was voluntary. Consent was also obtained from the managers of facilities.

2.3 Questionnaire development

It used a questionnaire collecting demographic data of our own design and the Polish version of the questionnaire by Coker et al. – Nurses’ Perceived Obstacles to Pain Assessment and Management Practices [10]. The questionnaire included 40 questions to assess how often the obstacles defined by nurses impeded optimum pain assessment and its management in elderly patients. With the authors’ permission, two questions were modified to adapt to the issues of postoperative therapy. The original versions of the tools were analyzed in terms of factor accuracy, internal coherence and discriminating strength. Reasoning on the internal consistency of the questionnaire scales was performed by calculating Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of internal consistency. The psychometric parameters obtained were satisfactory. Cronbach’s reliability a coefficient – values of 0.7 and more were accepted as values confirming reliability of the scale.

The Polish-language version of the questionnaire was prepared by translating them from English into Polish and then back-translating by two independent translators. The language adaptation and use of the tools for the present study took place with the written permission of the authors.

2.4 Statistical analysis

All the statistical calculations were performed using STATISTICA 10.0 data analysis software system (www. StatSoft.com). Quantitative variables were characterized by descriptive statistics of mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum value (range) and 95% CI (confidence interval). And qualitative variables were presented by means of group size and percentage values (per cent). The W. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify whether a quantitative variable came from a normally distributed population, and Levene’s (Brown-Forsythe’s) test was used to verify the hypothesis of equal variances. The significance of differences between the two groups (uncorrelated variables model) was examined by means of significance tests: Student’s t-test (or Welch’s test in the event of inhomogeneity of variance) or Mann-Whitney’s U-test (if the conditions for using Student’s t-test were not fulfilled or for variables measured on an ordinal scale). The significance of differences between more than two groups was measured by means of test F (ANOVA - analysis of variance) or of the Kruskal-Wallis test (if the conditions for using ANOVA were not met). If statistically significant differences between groups were found, Dunn’s post hoc tests were used.

For a model of two correlated variables, Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used (if the conditions for using Student’s t-test were not fulfilled or for variables measured on an ordinal scale). The significance of differences between more than two variables in a model of correlated variables was verified by means of repeated measures analysis of variance or Friedman’s test (if the conditions for using repeated measures analysis of variance were not fulfilled or for variables measured on an ordinal scale).

Chi-square independence tests were used for qualitative variables (using Yates correction for below 10 cells, Cochran’s conditions test or Fisher’s exact test, accordingly).

To establish the correlation, strength and direction between variables, a correlation analysis was used by calculating Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation ratios. The significance level assumed in all the calculations was p<0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Demographic & personal characteristics

The study included a total of 2000 respondents, from whom a total of 1602 correctly completed questionnaires were obtained. The largest proportion of nurses (40.9%) participating in the study were in the 31-40 age bracket. Work seniority of the nursing staff was defined in several time brackets. The most respondents (24.2%) were in the 16-20 years group. An analysis of the respondents’ level of education showed that most of the respondents declared secondary education (57.7%), and the least – a bachelor’s degree (10.7%). 56.4% of the study subjects worked at a provincial hospital, and the vast majority worked on a surgical ward (65.5%).

96.8% of the respondents worked as unit nurses. Only 40.3% of the respondents had access to the Internet at work. Table 1 presents the demographic characteristics of the nurses participating in the study.

Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of nurses.

VariablesN%
Gender (n=1602)
 Female (F)153095.5
 Male (M)724.5
Age (n=1602)
mean=40,23; Range=21-62; SD=7,61
 21-3016712.8
 31-4053240.9
 41-5048737.5
 51-621148.8
Years of Nursing Experience (in years)
mean=17,94; Range=42; SD=8,76
 1-51539.5
 6-101207.5
 11-1522614.1
 16-2038724.2
 21-2533721.0
 26-3028117.5
 31-35835.2
 36-42160.9
Current Role (n=1602)
 Staff Nurse (SN)154596.8
 Charge Nurse (CN)573.2
Education (n=1602)
 Registered Nurse92557.7
 Bachelor of Science in Nursing17210.7
 Master of Science in Nursing50531.5
Types of Hospital
 University (1)30819.2
 Provincial (2)90446.4
 Municipal (3)39024.3
Hospital department
 Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit (1)26616.6
 Surgery (2)104965.5
 Orthopedic (3)22714.2
 Oncology (4)603.7
Internet availability (n=1602)
 Yes (Y)64640.3
 No (N)95659.7

3.2 Healthcare system-related barriers

Ten questions concerning the healthcare system were isolated from the survey – they are presented in Table 2. The obstacle the most frequently reported by the respondents was the lack of possibility of discussing the pain management therapy of an elderly patient directly with the team M=4.37. The least frequently reported problem was inadequate time to deliver non-pharmacologic pain relief measures M= 3.00.

Table 2

Characteristics of the frequency of barriers to optimum pain assessment and management in elderly patients related to the healthcare system.

BarrierMeanStandard deviation
Disorganized system of care (e.g., having to hunt for narcotic keys, obtain co-signatures, find drugs, etc.)3.531.85
Not having a consistent way of assessing pain, from one time to the next, in each older patient3.791.43
Not having policies/procedures/guidelines that contribute to my knowledge of acceptable best practices around pain assessment and management in older adults3.441.50
Not having a documented approach to pain assessment for each older patient3.611.64
Not having a documented pain treatment plan for each older patient3.731.64
Unavailable comfort measures as alternatives/supplements to pain medications in older patients (e.g., hot/cold packs, mattresses, chairs)3.681.54
Inadequate time to deliver non-pharmacologic pain relief measures3.001.60
Inadequate time for health teaching with older patients (e.g., p.r.n. drug order, alternatives, addiction, etc.)4.281.56
Lack of opportunity to discuss an older patient’s pain management directly with care team4.371.67
Lack of opportunity to consult with clinical pharmacist about pain relief in older patients4.351.87

3.3 Healthcare professional-related barriers

Five questions concerning physician-related barriers were isolated from the survey – the results are presented in Table 3. The problem most frequently identified by nurses was the physicians’ reluctance to prescribe adequate analgesics for elderly patients because of concerns about possible overdosing in patients with dementia or delirium M=3.68 The respondents definitely less frequently pointed to such problems as their ward colleagues’ attitude to pain management in elderly patients as a barrier to pain management, with the average result M=3.0

Table 3

Frequency characteristics of obstacles to optimal pain assessment and treatment in elderly patients associated with physicians.

BarrierMeanStandard deviation
Physicians’ lack of trust in the nursing assessment of pain in older patients3.601.60
Physicians’ lack of knowledge and experience with prescribing pain medications3.471.50
Antipsychotics are considered before pain medications in agitated patients3.551.34
Physicians’ reluctance to prescribe adequate pain relief in older patients for fear of overmedicating those with dementia or delirium3.681.52
The “older person is dying anyway” attitude among colleagues on the unit3.001.90

Further questions concerning nurse-perceived barriers to optimum pain assessment and management in elderly patients and related to the nursing staff were isolated and they are presented in Table 4. Ignorance of pain intensity in elderly patients because of insufficient time spent with them was the most frequently perceived problem M=3.90. The respondents definitely less frequently pointed to their own reluctance to administer analgesics to elderly patients for fear of overmedication as a barrier to pain management; the average result was M=2.55.

Table 4

Frequency characteristics of obstacles to optimal pain assessment and treatment in elderly patients associated with nursing staff.

BarrierMeanStandard deviation
Difficulty contacting or communicating with physicians to discuss pain assessment findings in older patients3.791.61
Not expecting pain in older patients on our unit unless the diagnosis provides a clue to pain as a potential symptom3.211.33
Difficulty believing pain reports by older patients because they are inconsistent from one time to the next, and do not match their non-verbal behaviour3.481.24
Not knowing how much pain is acceptable to each older patient (e.g., pain tolerance, discomfort level)3.861.31
Not knowing older patients’ pain levels due to inadequate time spent with them3.901.40
Not knowing whether to believe the older patient’s pain report or the family’s perception of the person’s pain instead3.821.32
Concentrating on administering regularly scheduled medications and not checking for and offering p.r.n. pain relief unless the patient requests it3.471.36
My own reluctance to give pain medication to older patients for fear of overmedicating2.551.36
Inconsistent practices around giving p.r.n. medications for an older patient (because the decision to administer pain medication is up to the assigned nurse, and varies from one to another)2.951.40
Uncertainty about how to best time the administration of p.r.n. pain medications when ordered along with scheduled pain medications in older patients3.111.25
Not having a consistent way of receiving tips from nurses on previous shifts about pain assessment and management strategies for each of my older patients3.151.38
Lack of clinical confidence in assessing a variety of types of pain in older patients3.711.42
The tendency to document only if pain relief is not achieved or if the patient refuses pain medication3.421.52
Difficulty contacting or communicating with physicians to discuss treatment of pain in older patients3.821.57

3.4 Patient-related barriers

Another 11 questions concerning patient-related barriers to optimum pain assessment and management in elderly patients perceived by nurses were isolated and they are presented in Table 5. It was demonstrated that elderly patients’ difficulties with completing the pain rating scale were the most frequently perceived problem, and the average result in each of the hospitals was M=4.43. The respondents the least frequently reported a problem of elderly patients’ reluctance to take analgesics because of fear of addiction M=3.16.

Table 5

Frequency characteristics of obstacles to optimal pain assessment and treatment in elderly patients, associated with the patients.

BarrierMeanStandard deviation
Older patients’ difficulty with completing pain scales (e.g., 0-10)4.431.28
Older patients’ reluctance to take pain medication for fear of addiction3.161.36
Older patients not wanting to bother the nurses3.601.33
Older patients denying their disease process by denying pain3.521.24
Older patients’ willingness to put up with chronic pain3.871.21
Older patients’ reluctance to take pain medications because of side effects (e.g., constipation, how it makes them feel, etc.)3.531.35
Difficulty assessing pain in older people due to language barriers3.351.50
Difficulty assessing pain in older people due to problems with cognition (delirium, dementia, etc.)4,021.36
Difficulty assessing pain in older people due to sensory problems (hearing deficits, vision deficits, etc.)4.131.25
Difficulty assessing pain in older people due to alterations in mood (depression, etc.)4.001.19
Patients reporting their pain to the doctor, but not to the nurse3.741.62

To sum up, counting the overall average result, the problems related to the healthcare system came first with the average result of M=3.77. Second, there were patient-related barriers, where the average result was M=3.75. They were followed by physician-related M=3.46 and nurse-related barriers M=3.44.

3.5 Demographic variables and nurse perception

The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient was used to measure the strength and direction of association between variables. No correlation was found between the subjects’ age, duration of employment and the perception of problems by nurses. The analysis showed a significant relationship between organizational problems and the level of nurses’ education. (Table 6).

Table 6

Age, duration of employment, education and perception of problems by nurses.

BarriersAgeDuration of employmentEducation
rHO[*]prHO[*]prHO[*]p
Organizational Barriers0,0320,1970,0070,7660,0480,057
Physician-Related Barriers0,0210,4020,0370,1360,0290,239
Nurse-Related Barriers0,0380,1270,0100,7010,0150,559
Patient-Related Barriers0,0170,5090,0110,6490,0190,458

For comparison of the barriers in the assessment of pain perceived by nurses working in wards of surveyed hospitals, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. In the university hospital, organizational problems were statistically significantly more frequent than in the provincial or municipal hospital (Table 7). Nurses statistically significantly more often reported such problems on the Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit (Table 8). To calculate the correlation between the position of work, use of the Internet and the problems perceived by nurses the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used. There were no statically significant relationships.

Table 7

Type of hospital and perception of problems by nurses.

BarriersHospital[*]NMSDHdfp
13084,091,13
Organizational Barriers29093,781,1116,4720,000
33853,811,07
13083,461,17
Physician-Related Barriers29093,471,130,4920,784
33853,421,07
13083,490,92
Nurse-Related Barriers29093,440,930,7220,699
33853,430,93
13083,750,81
Patient-Related Barriers29093,800,823,5020,174
33853,730,76

†Kruskala – Wallisa test

Table 8

Hospital department and perception of problems by nurses.

BarriersHospital[*] departmentNMSDHdfp
12663,981,15
Organizational Barriers210493,781,10
32273,981,1013,6630,003
4603,961,01
12663,741,06
210493,331,13
Physician-Related Barriers32273,571,0943,1530,000
4603,841,09
12663,630,90
Nurse-Related Barriers210493,410,94
32273,480,9019,1430,000
4603,280,887
12663,890,84
210493,770,80
Patient-Related Barriers32273,670,797,8230,050
4603,770,86

†Kruskala - Wallisa test

4 Discussion

Pain management is of vital importance in nursing practice. It is a critical issue for patients as well, yet they still suffer from suboptimal pain control. Recent years have seen a growing interest in the field of postoperative pain with immense efforts to improve its management [11-14].

The most frequently perceived barriers to pain assessment and management were healthcare system-related barriers with the chief problem being the lack of proper communication with the “pain team” to discuss the pain therapy to be administered to a patient [15,16]. As a consequence the delivery of effective pain management may be delayed or even neglected. One must bear in mind that nurses serve as intermediaries between physicians and patients and play the key role in the monitoring of patients’ pain [17,18]. Communication about pain is fundamental to patient comfort, hence clear, concise and well-timed communication between nurses and physicians is compulsory for pain management. It seems very important that the healthcare administrators should try and emphasize the importance of collaborative and supportive relationships between team members [1,3,12,14].

Physicians’ reluctance to prescribe adequate analgesics for fear of possible overdosing in elderly patients with dementia may originate from inadequate knowledge among physicians about opioids and misconceptions about their use and side effects [15,16].

The analysis of nurse-related barriers reveals that ignorance of the pain intensity acceptable by elderly patients poses a problem. Pain is under-reported and illtreated in the elderly with cognitive deficit. With declining verbal communications, the assessment becomes more and more difficult [17]. Hence it should occur at the earliest possible stage of dementia when communication abilities are preserved. It should be noted that in an elderly with dementia the pain assessment techniques will be much more time consuming than in other patients and that is why the accessibility of enough nursing staff is the cornerstone for any care plan [18,19]. Additionally, it is imperative for nurses to have knowledge and proficiency to provide uniform painless care and this can be accomplished through regular ongoing education in pain assessment and management. Serious efforts should be spent in nursing colleges and hospitals to prepare and provide nurses with wide-ranging tools to assess and manage pain correctly [20, 21].

Patients’ expressing his pain as precisely as possible is vital for the patient. The nurse may want to educate the patient and his family on the importance of accurate reporting [1, 15]. The patient ought to realize that it is crucial to report pain in a timely fashion, once it arises. Effective pain control can only take place if the patient effectively communicates the pain level and characteristics to the nurse [19].

5 Limits of the study

The authors divided the questions into groups associated with different types of barriers by themselves, already after completing questionnaires by respondents. The lack of a priori division could affect the quality of the answers given by the respondents.

6 Conclusions

Barriers to pain assessment related to the healthcare system were statistically significantly more frequent in university hospitals.

7 Implications for practice

There are still inadequately used options for postoperative pain relief and pain management needs substantial improvement. There is a requirement for organizational and political obligation to improve postoperative care of the elderly. This study can contribute to the enhancement of pain management quality by supporting and developing practical guidelines or management algorithms for nurses, helping to effectively implement new pain management practices.

Acknowelegements

The authors wish to thank all the nurses for their co-operation in the study.

  1. Conflict of interest

    Conflict of interest statement: All authors declare to note have any conflicts of interest.

Reference

[1] Rawal N., Organization, function, and implementation of acute pain service, Anesthesiol Clin North America, 2005, 23, 211-22510.1016/j.atc.2004.11.012Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Breivik H., Stubhaug A., Management of acute postoperative pain: still a long way to go! Pain 2008, 137, 233-23410.1016/j.pain.2008.04.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Nagi H., Acute pain services in the United Kingdom, Acute Pain, 2004, 5, 89-10710.1016/j.acpain.2004.01.004Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Alqahtani M, Jones L.K., Holroyd E. Organisational barriers to effective pain management amongst oncology nurses in Saudi Arabia. J Hos Adm, 2016, 5(1), 81-8910.5430/jha.v5n1p81Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Elcigil A., Maltepe H., Esrefgil G., Mutafoglu K., Nurses’ perceived barriers to assessment and management of pain in a university hospital, J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2011, 33(1), 33-3810.1097/MPH.0b013e3182121befSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Hauck S., Rebecca P., Kursic J., Leadership Facilitation strategies to establish evidence-based practice in an acute care hospital, J Clin Nurs 2012, 69, 664-67410.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06053.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Herr K., Titler M.G., Schilling M.L., Marsh J.L., Xie X., Ardery G., Clarke W.R., Everett L.Q., Evidence-Based Assessment of Acute Pain in Older Adults: current nursing practices and perceived barriers, Clin J Pain 2004, 20, 331-34010.1097/00002508-200409000-00008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] De Rond M., De Wit R., Van Dam F., The implementation of a pain monitoring programme for nurses in daily clinical practice; results of a follow up study in five hospitals. J AdvNurs, 2001, 29(2), 590-59810.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01875.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Van Hecke A., Van Lancker A., De Clercq B., De Meyere C., Dequeker, S., Devulder J., Pain Intensity in Hospitalized Adults: A Multilevel Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators of Pain Management, Nurs Res, 2016, 65, 290-30010.1097/NNR.0000000000000160Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Coker E., Papaioannou A., Kaasalainen S., Dolovich L., Turpie I., Taniguchi A., Nurses perceived barriers to optimal pain management in older adults on acute medical units, Appl Nurs Res, 2010, 23, 139-14610.1016/j.apnr.2008.07.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Ferrell B., Virani R., Grant M., Juarez G., Analysis of pain content in nursing textbooks, J Pain Symptom Manage, 2000, 19(3), 216-22810.1016/S0885-3924(00)00107-XSuche in Google Scholar

[12] Yanuka M., Soffer D., Halpern P., An interventional study to improve the quality of analgesia in the emergency department, CJEM, 2008, 10, 435-43910.1017/S1481803500010526Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Egan M., & Cornally N., Identifying barriers to pain management in long-term care, Nurs Older People, 2013, 25(7), 25-3110.7748/nop2013.09.25.7.25.e455Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] McCloskey D.J., Nurses’ perceptions of research utilization in a corporate health care system. J Nurs, 2008, 40, 39-4510.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00204.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Coulling S., Nurses’ and doctors’ knowledge of pain after surgery, Nurs Stand, 2005, 19(34), 41-4910.7748/ns2005.05.19.34.41.c3859Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Duignan M., Dunn V., Barriers to pain management in emergency departments. Emerg Nurse, 2008, 15(9), 30-3410.7748/en2008.02.15.9.30.c8179Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Kaye A.D., Baluch A., Scott J.T., Pain management in the elderly population: a review, Ochsner, 2010, 10(3), 179-187Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Horbury C., Henderson A., Bromley B., Influences of patient behavior on clinical nurses’ pain assessment: implications for continuing education, J Contin Educ Nurs, 2005, 36, 18-2410.3928/0022-0124-20050101-05Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Sadeghi-Bazargani H., Tabrizi J.S., Azami-Aghdash S., Barriers to evidence-based medicine: a systematic review, J Eval Clin Pract 2014, 20, 793-80210.1111/jep.12222Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Goodacre S.W., Roden R.K., A protocol to improve analgesia use in the accident and emergency department, J Acid Emerg Med, 2001, 13, 177-62210.1136/emj.13.3.177Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] Motov S.M., Khan A.N., Problems and barriers of pain management in the emergency department: Are we ever going to get better? J Pain Res, 2009, 2, 5-1110.2147/JPR.S4324Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-10-26
Accepted: 2017-6-19
Published Online: 2017-8-10

© 2017 Wioletta Medrzycka-Dabrowka et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Intravascular treatment of left subclavian artery aneurysm coexisting with aortic coarctation in an adult patient
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Effect of electrical stimulation on blood flow velocity and vessel size
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Live birth pregnancy outcome after first in vitro fertilization treatment in a patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and isolated high positive IgA anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies: a case report
  7. Regular Articles
  8. Periodontal ligament stem cells regulate apoptosis of neutrophils
  9. Regular Articles
  10. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in implants dentistry in combination with new bone regenerative flapless technique: evolution of the technique and final results
  11. Regular Articles
  12. The significance of strong ion gap for predicting return of spontaneous circulation in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Clinicopathology of EpCAM and EGFR in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma
  15. Regular Articles
  16. Intraosseous lipoma of the mandibula: A case report and review of the literature
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Transurethral resection of the prostate, bladder explosion and hyponatremic encephalopathy: a rare case report of malpractice
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Brain strokes related to aortic aneurysma – the analysis of three cases
  21. Regular Articles
  22. Effect of Bicyclol tablets on drug induced liver injuries after kidney transplantation
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Plasma free fatty acids in hyperemesis gravidarum pregnancy
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Impact of chromosomal rearrangement upon DNA methylation patterns in leukemia
  27. Regular Articles
  28. Gefitinib versus docetaxel in treated non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis
  29. Regular Articles
  30. The clinical characteristics of patients with chronic idiopathic anal pain
  31. Regular Articles
  32. Bone tunnel impaction reduced the tibial tunnel enlargement
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Effects of S-1 combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Predictions and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in the patients with acute myocardial infarction
  37. Regular Articles
  38. An accuracy study of the Intracavitary Electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) guided peripherally inserted central catheter tip placement among neonates
  39. Regular Articles
  40. Serum CA125, CA199 and CEA combined detection for epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Surface coil intensity correction in magnetic resonance imaging in spinal metastases
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Muscle stem cell and physical activity: what point is the debate at?
  45. Regular Articles
  46. MicroRNA let-7g directly targets forkhead box C2 (FOXC2) to modulate bone metastasis in breast cancer
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Monitoring health inequalities at the municipal level: Lithuanian experience
  49. Regular Articles
  50. Role of Epstein-Barr virus in the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Thrombectomy combined with indwelling-catheter thrombolysis is more effective than pure thrombectomy for the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Expression of Hepcidin and Neogenin in colorectal cancer
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Carnitine and adiponectin levels in breast cancer after radiotherapy
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Pathophysiology of meningioma growth in pregnancy
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Causal neuro-immune relationships at patients with chronic pyelonephritis and cholecystitis. Correlations between parameters EEG, HRV and white blood cell count
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Measuring efficiency of secondary healthcare providers in Slovenia
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Galectin-3 expression in colorectal cancer and its correlation with clinical pathological characteristics and prognosis
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Model for studying anti- allergic drugs for allergic conjunctivitis in animals
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Barriers perceived by nurses in the optimal treatment of postoperative pain
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Tumor microenvironment in treatment of glioma
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Delirium risk of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients treated with postoperative mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Hemangioma of the rib: a rare case report and literature review
  75. Regular Articles
  76. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional forceps biopsy compared to ESD
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Increased miR-25 expression in serum of gastric cancer patients is correlated with CA19-9 and acts as a potential diagnostic biomarker
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Therapeutic nanomedicine surmounts the limitations of pharmacotherapy
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Relationship between PD-L1 expression and clinical characteristics in patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Trypsinogen activation peptide induces HMGB1 release from rat pancreatic acinar cells
  85. Regular Articles
  86. The effective regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines induced by combination of PA-MSHA and BPIFB1 in initiation of innate immune responses
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Cell based therapeutic approach in vascular surgery: application and review
  89. Regular Articles
  90. Clinical efficacy of alprostadil combined with α-lipoic acid in the treatment of elderly patients with diabetic nephropathy
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Professional burnout and concurrent health complaints in neonatal nursing
  93. Regular Articles
  94. Esophageal xanthoma: presence of M2 macrophages suggests association with late inflammatory and reparative processes
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Cone beam computed tomography analysis in 3D position of maxillary denture
  97. Regular Articles
  98. CK20 mRNA expression in serum as a biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Serum AFU, 5’-NT and AFP as biomarkers for primary hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis
  101. Regular Articles
  102. Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: systematic review and meta-analysis
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The Fountain of Youth: A tale of parabiosis, stem cells, and rejuvenation
  105. Regular Articles
  106. Foam sclerotherapy during shunt surgery for portal hypertension and varices
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Insomnia and depression: Japanese hospital workers questionnaire survey
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Serum NF-κBp65, TLR4 as biomarker for diagnosis of preeclampsia
  111. Regular Articles
  112. Docetaxel/cisplatin therapy in myasthenia gravis with hypertension/diabetes
  113. Regular Articles
  114. Fluid resuscitation and markers of glycocalyx degradation in severe sepsis
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Modified Sauve-Kapandji procedure for patients with old fractures of the distal radius
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Bile leakage after liver transplantation
  119. Regular Articles
  120. VEGF overexpression predicts poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma
  121. Regular Articles
  122. Galen vein aneurysm– challenge for treatment
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Retrieval of a broken sewing needle from the sacrum aided by a permanent magnet: a case report and literature review
  125. Regular Articles
  126. HIV/STI prevention interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Aortic aneurysm as a complication of myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Real-time monitoring of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for radio frequency ablation
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Successful drug-eluting stent implantation in a male patient with dextrocardia: a case report
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Primary pleomorphic liposarcoma of fallopian tube with recurrence: a case report and review of the literature
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Color Doppler Ultrasound in Uterine Arterial Embolization
  137. Regular Articles
  138. Pattern of alcohol consumption by young people from North Eastern Portugal
  139. Regular Articles
  140. Effects of out-of-hospital continuing nursing on schizophrenia patients' rehabilitation and quality of life
Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2017-0037/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen