Home Medicine Delirium risk of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients treated with postoperative mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis
Article Open Access

Delirium risk of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients treated with postoperative mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis

  • Wang Peng , Shan Shimin EMAIL logo , Wang Hongli , Zhang Yanli and Zhang Ying
Published/Copyright: August 10, 2017

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate by meta-analysis the effects of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam on postoperative delirium in patients that received postoperative mechanical ventilation.

Methods

The electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, CBM, Cochrane library and WanFang were searched by two reviewers. All the clinical studies related to dexmedetomidine versus midazolam on postoperative delirium were screened and collected in this meta-analysis. The combined postoperative delirium risk between dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups was pooled by random effect model. The publication bias was assessed by Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s line regression test.

Results

A total of six studies including 386 subjects (202 in the dexmedetomidine group and 184 in the midazolam group) were finally included in this meta-analysis. All six studies reported adequate sequence generation. Three studies used blindness methods and 2 publications were free of selective reporting. However, only 1 publication reported allocation concealment. Because of significant heterogeneity across the studies (I2=61.7%, p<0.05), the data were pooled by random effect model. Pooled data showed the postoperative delirium risk in the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that of the midazolam group (RR=0.20 (095%CI:0.09~0.47, p<0.05)).The Begg’s funnel plot showed obvious asymmetry at the bottom and Egger’s line regression test also indicated significant publication bias (t=-6.51, p<0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with midazolam, patients that received dexmedetomidine for postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation had less risk of developing delirium.

1 Introduction

Patients who receive major surgery are at increased risk of developing postoperative delirium as the result of, the administration of anesthetic agents and postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation [1,2]. Dexmedetomidine and midazolam are generally used for postoperative mechanical ventilation in patients who received major surgery. Several studies have compared the postoperative delirium risk for dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients treated with postoperative mechanical ventilation [3-5]. Maldonado and his colleagues [3] conducted a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate the effects of postoperative sedation on the development of delirium in patients undergoing cardiac-valve procedures. Three postoperative sedation drugs were used: dexmedetomidine, propofol, or midazolam. They found that postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine was associated with significantly lower rates of postoperative delirium and lower care costs. However, because of the small sample size and different surgery procedures, the conclusion was not conclusive. In our present meta-analysis, we searched the databases for all potential studies related to the comparison of delirium risk for dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients treated with postoperative mechanical ventilation.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Publications identification

The electronic databases of Pubmed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, CBM, Cochrane library and Wanfang were searched by two reviewers (Wang Peng and Zhang Ying). All the clinical studies related to dexmedetomidine versus midazolam on postoperative delirium were screened and collected in this meta-analysis. The publication search words were “dexmedetomidine”, “midazolam”, “delirium” AND “mechanical ventilation” as Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and corresponding free text words.

2.2 Inclusion, exclusion criteria and data extraction

The inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis were: 1) clinical controlled trial study types; 2) patients treated with dexmedetomidine or midazolam for postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation; and 3) outcome of the included studies should include the incidence of delirium. The exclusion criteria were: 1) case report or review study type; 2) duplicated publications; 3) using other drugs for postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation; and 4) studies without enough data to calculate the postoperative delirium incidence rate.

2.3 Quality assessments

The methodological qualities for the 6 studies chosen were assessed by two authors (Wang Peng and Sha Shimin) according to the Cochrane Reviews Handbook with a six-item questionnaire:1)adequate sequence generation? 2)allocation concealment? 3)blinding? 4)incomplete outcome data addressed? 5)free of selective reporting? And 6) free of other bias? If the paper addressed the item, the quality assessment was marked with “Yes” for low risk. If the paper did not address the item, the quality assessment was marked with “No” for high risk.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Review Manager 5.0 and STATA/SE 12.0 were used to do all statistical analysis. Statistical heterogeneity among the included 6 publications was evaluated by chi-square (χ2) test, and the inconsistency was demonstrated by I2. If statistical heterogeneity existed (χ2, p<0.1 or I2>50%), the random-effect model (Dersimonian-Laird method) was used to pool the data. Inversely, without significant heterogeneity among the included studies, the fixed-effect model was used to pool the data. The publication bias was evaluated by Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s line regression test.

3 Results

3.1 Studies’ characteristics

After searching the databases, a total of six studies [3-8] including 386 subjects (202 in the dexmedetomidine group and 184 in the midazolam group) were included in the final meta-analysis. The publication searching flowchart is shown in Figure 1. The paper publication years range from 2009 to 2013 with a minimum sample size of 20 and a maximum sample size of 100. The general characteristics of included studies are shown in Table 1.

Figure 1 Publication searching flow-chart
Figure 1

Publication searching flow-chart

Table 1

General information of included studies

AuthorYearNo. (Dex/Mid)TreatmentQuality
DexMid
Maldonado JR200930/301μg/kg, (0.2-0.7) μg/(kg·h)0.1mg/kg, (0.04-0.1) mg/(kg·h)(1),(3),(4), (5), (6)
Tao SY201130/301μg/kg0.05mg/kg(1),(2),(4)
Zhao W201110/10(0.2-0.7) μg/(kg·h)(0.03-0.13) mg/(kg·h)(1)
Dan HC201252/483.08μg/kg0.37mg/kg(1),(3),(4), (6)
Gu JX201240/36(0.2-0.7) μg/(kg·h)(0.04-0.2) mg/(kg·h)(1), (5)
Xiao Y201320/201μg/kg0.05mg/kg,(1),(3),(4), (6)

(1)adequate sequence generation? (2)allocation concealment? (3)blinding? (4)incomplete outcome data addressed? (5)free of selective reporting? (6) free of other bias?

3.2 Quality evaluation of each study

All of the six studies reported adequate sequence generation.Three3 studies used blindness methods and 2 publications were free of selective reporting. However, only 1 publication reported allocation concealment. The general methodological qualities of the included 6 studies are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2 General quality of the included 6 studies.( “+/Yes” for low risk; “-/No” for high risk; “?” for moderate risk)
Figure 2

General quality of the included 6 studies.( “+/Yes” for low risk; “-/No” for high risk; “?” for moderate risk)

3.3 Statistical heterogeneity

The statistical heterogeneity across the 6 studies was evaluated by chi-square (χ2) test, and the inconsistency was demonstrated by I2. Significant statistical heterogeneity was found across the studies with chi-square of 13.05 (I2=61.7%, p<0.05).

3.4 Meta-analysis

Because of significant heterogeneity across the studies, the data was pooled by random effect model. Pooled data showed the postoperative delirium risk in dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that of the midazolam group (RR=0.20(95%CI:0.09~0.47, p<0.05), Figure 3).

Figure 3 Forest plot of postoperative delirium risk between dexmedetomidine and midazolam group
Figure 3

Forest plot of postoperative delirium risk between dexmedetomidine and midazolam group

3.5 Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis was performed by omitting each of the included studies. The results showed that the RR was not changed significantly by omitting each of the studies. This indicated the meta-analysis results were stable and not sensitive to any one of the 6 studies, Figure 4.

Figure 4 Forest plot of sensitivity analysis
Figure 4

Forest plot of sensitivity analysis

3.6 Publication bias

Publication bias was assessed by Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s line regression test. The Begg’s funnel plot showed obvious asymmetry at the bottom (Figure 5) and Egger’s line regression test also indicated significant publication bias (t=-6.51, p<0.05).

Figure 5 Begg’s funnel plot for evaluation publication bias
Figure 5

Begg’s funnel plot for evaluation publication bias

4 Discussion

Postoperative delirium is common in patients who received postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation. Postoperative delirium is known as an acute organic mental syndrome which has been shown to affect up to 80% of patients who received postoperative mechanical ventilation or treated in intensive-care units (ICU) [9]. As has been reported, the risk factors for delirium included elderly age, sleep deprivation, metabolic abnormalities, alcohol or drug abuse and postoperative sedation [10, 11]. Several studies had reported that the development of postoperative delirium can increase the risk of morbidity, mortality, postoperative complications, and prolong the time of hospitalization [12]. Dexmedetomidine and midazolam are two kinds of drugs commonly used for postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation [13-15]. The risk of developing delirium with these two drugs was not completely clear. Several studies compared the postoperative delirium risk for dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients treated with postoperative mechanical ventilation. Maldonado JR [3] and his colleagues reported a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the postoperative delirium risk for patients that received dexmedetomidine, propofol or midazolam for postoperative sedation. They found that the incidence of postoperative delirium were 3% and 50% for receiving dexmedetomidine and midazolam respectively with statistical difference. However, Xiao et al [7] performed another study evaluating the postoperative delirium risk in patients who received dexmedetomidine or midazolam for postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation. They found that postoperative delirium risk between the two groups was not statistical different. These inconsistent results may be caused by weak statistical power because of the small sample size of each study.

In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam on postoperative delirium in patients who received postoperative mechanical ventilation. In this study, we included six clinical trials with 386 subjects (202 in the dexmedetomidine group and 184 in the midazolam group). The postoperative delirium risk in the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that of midazolam group (RR=0.20(95%CI:0.09~0.47, p<0.05)). Compared with midazolam, patients that received dexmedetomidine for postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation had less risk of developing delirium.

Dexmedetomidine is one of most used drugs for analgesia and sedation in mechanical ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients and was approved by the Federal Drug Adminstration (FDA) in year 1999. Dexmedetomidine is known as a highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist. It can bind to transmembrane G protein-binding adrenoreceptors in brain and spinal cord tissues [16, 17]. Clinically, dexmedetomidine has the effects of analgesic and sedation without suppressing the respiratory system. So, dexmedetomidine is wildly used for postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation. And in our present meta-analysis, we also found that compared with midazolam, patients that received dexmedetomidine for postoperative mechanical ventilation sedation had less risk of developing delirium.

Several limitations were also observed in this meta-analysis. Firstly, only six studies were included in this meta-analysis. Secondly, significant statistical heterogeneity was found across the included studies which may decrease the statistical power. Thirdly, there was obvious publication bias in this meta-analysis. Because of the above limitations, well designed prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the delirium risk of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients treated with postoperative mechanical ventilation.


Tel: +86 022-65665663

  1. Conflict of interest

    Conflict of interest statement: Authors state no conflict of interest

References

[1] Javedan H, Tulebaev S. Management of common postoperative complications: delirium[J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2014,30(2):271-27810.1016/j.cger.2014.01.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Bilotta F, Lauretta MP, Borozdina A, et al. Postoperative delirium: risk factors, diagnosis and perioperative care[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2013,79(9):1066-107610.1097/00003643-201306001-00028Search in Google Scholar

[3] Maldonado JR, Wysong A, van der Starre PJ, et al. Dexmedetomidine and the reduction of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery[J]. Psychosomatics, 2009,50(3):206-21710.1176/appi.psy.50.3.206Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Huachen T. Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine in patients received with postoperative mechanical ventilation[J]. Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, 2012,21(19):2093-2094Search in Google Scholar

[5] Tao Shaoyu LW, Xiefei Q. Sedation effects of dexmedetomidine for patients received postoperative mechanical ventilation[J]. Chinese journal of critical care medicine, 2011,31(12):1103-1105Search in Google Scholar

[6] Wang Z. Dexmedetomidine used for patients received postoperative mechanical ventilation[D]. 2011Search in Google Scholar

[7] Xiao Yun WY, Minna D. Sedation effects of dexmedetomidine for patients in intensive-care unit[J]. Journal of Kunming Medical University, 2013,(12):96-99Search in Google Scholar

[8] Gu Xianhua ZQ. Delirium risk of dexmedetomidine in patients with postoperative mechanical ventilation in ICU[J]. Zhejiang Medical Journal, 2012,34(12):1077-1079Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ely EW, Gautam S, Margolin R, et al. The impact of delirium in the intensive care unit on hospital length of stay[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2001,27(12):1892-190010.1007/s00134-001-1132-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Wang L, Seok S, Kim S, et al. The Risk Factors of Postoperative Delirium after Total Knee Arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg, 201610.1055/s-0036-1593872Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Jiang X, Chen D, Lou Y, et al. Risk factors for postoperative delirium after spine surgery in middle- and old-aged patients[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 201610.1007/s40520-016-0640-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Bhattacharya B, Maung A, Barre K, et al. Postoperative delirium is associated with increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stays after liver transplantation[J]. J Surg Res, 2017,207:223-22810.1016/j.jss.2016.08.084Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Lin YT, Lan KM, Wang LK, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and phenomenological characteristics of postoperative delirium in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a prospective cohort study[J]. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 2016,12:3205-321210.2147/NDT.S119817Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Jo YY, Lee D, Jung WS, et al. Comparison of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Bispectral Index-Guided Sedation During Spinal Anesthesia[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2016,22:3544-355110.12659/MSM.896461Search in Google Scholar

[15] Chun EH, Han MJ, Baik HJ, et al. Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus Dexmedetomidine-midazolam-fentanyl for monitored anesthesia care during chemoport insertion: a Prospective Randomized Study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2016,16(1):4910.1186/s12871-016-0211-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Huupponen E, Maksimow A, Lapinlampi P, et al. Electroencephalogram spindle activity during dexmedetomidine sedation and physiological sleep[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2008,52(2):289-29410.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01537.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Guo TZ, Jiang JY, Buttermann AE, et al. Dexmedetomidine injection into the locus ceruleus produces antinociception[J]. Anesthesiology, 1996,84(4):873-88110.1097/00000542-199604000-00015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-1-18
Accepted: 2017-6-13
Published Online: 2017-8-10

© 2017 Wang Peng et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Intravascular treatment of left subclavian artery aneurysm coexisting with aortic coarctation in an adult patient
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Effect of electrical stimulation on blood flow velocity and vessel size
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Live birth pregnancy outcome after first in vitro fertilization treatment in a patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and isolated high positive IgA anti-β2glycoprotein I antibodies: a case report
  7. Regular Articles
  8. Periodontal ligament stem cells regulate apoptosis of neutrophils
  9. Regular Articles
  10. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in implants dentistry in combination with new bone regenerative flapless technique: evolution of the technique and final results
  11. Regular Articles
  12. The significance of strong ion gap for predicting return of spontaneous circulation in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Clinicopathology of EpCAM and EGFR in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma
  15. Regular Articles
  16. Intraosseous lipoma of the mandibula: A case report and review of the literature
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Transurethral resection of the prostate, bladder explosion and hyponatremic encephalopathy: a rare case report of malpractice
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Brain strokes related to aortic aneurysma – the analysis of three cases
  21. Regular Articles
  22. Effect of Bicyclol tablets on drug induced liver injuries after kidney transplantation
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Plasma free fatty acids in hyperemesis gravidarum pregnancy
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Impact of chromosomal rearrangement upon DNA methylation patterns in leukemia
  27. Regular Articles
  28. Gefitinib versus docetaxel in treated non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis
  29. Regular Articles
  30. The clinical characteristics of patients with chronic idiopathic anal pain
  31. Regular Articles
  32. Bone tunnel impaction reduced the tibial tunnel enlargement
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Effects of S-1 combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Predictions and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in the patients with acute myocardial infarction
  37. Regular Articles
  38. An accuracy study of the Intracavitary Electrocardiogram (IC-ECG) guided peripherally inserted central catheter tip placement among neonates
  39. Regular Articles
  40. Serum CA125, CA199 and CEA combined detection for epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Surface coil intensity correction in magnetic resonance imaging in spinal metastases
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Muscle stem cell and physical activity: what point is the debate at?
  45. Regular Articles
  46. MicroRNA let-7g directly targets forkhead box C2 (FOXC2) to modulate bone metastasis in breast cancer
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Monitoring health inequalities at the municipal level: Lithuanian experience
  49. Regular Articles
  50. Role of Epstein-Barr virus in the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Thrombectomy combined with indwelling-catheter thrombolysis is more effective than pure thrombectomy for the treatment of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Expression of Hepcidin and Neogenin in colorectal cancer
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Carnitine and adiponectin levels in breast cancer after radiotherapy
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Pathophysiology of meningioma growth in pregnancy
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Causal neuro-immune relationships at patients with chronic pyelonephritis and cholecystitis. Correlations between parameters EEG, HRV and white blood cell count
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Measuring efficiency of secondary healthcare providers in Slovenia
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Galectin-3 expression in colorectal cancer and its correlation with clinical pathological characteristics and prognosis
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Model for studying anti- allergic drugs for allergic conjunctivitis in animals
  67. Regular Articles
  68. Barriers perceived by nurses in the optimal treatment of postoperative pain
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Tumor microenvironment in treatment of glioma
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Delirium risk of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients treated with postoperative mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Hemangioma of the rib: a rare case report and literature review
  75. Regular Articles
  76. The diagnostic accuracy of conventional forceps biopsy compared to ESD
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Increased miR-25 expression in serum of gastric cancer patients is correlated with CA19-9 and acts as a potential diagnostic biomarker
  79. Regular Articles
  80. Therapeutic nanomedicine surmounts the limitations of pharmacotherapy
  81. Regular Articles
  82. Relationship between PD-L1 expression and clinical characteristics in patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma
  83. Regular Articles
  84. Trypsinogen activation peptide induces HMGB1 release from rat pancreatic acinar cells
  85. Regular Articles
  86. The effective regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines induced by combination of PA-MSHA and BPIFB1 in initiation of innate immune responses
  87. Regular Articles
  88. Cell based therapeutic approach in vascular surgery: application and review
  89. Regular Articles
  90. Clinical efficacy of alprostadil combined with α-lipoic acid in the treatment of elderly patients with diabetic nephropathy
  91. Regular Articles
  92. Professional burnout and concurrent health complaints in neonatal nursing
  93. Regular Articles
  94. Esophageal xanthoma: presence of M2 macrophages suggests association with late inflammatory and reparative processes
  95. Regular Articles
  96. Cone beam computed tomography analysis in 3D position of maxillary denture
  97. Regular Articles
  98. CK20 mRNA expression in serum as a biomarker for colorectal cancer diagnosis: A meta-analysis
  99. Regular Articles
  100. Serum AFU, 5’-NT and AFP as biomarkers for primary hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis
  101. Regular Articles
  102. Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: systematic review and meta-analysis
  103. Regular Articles
  104. The Fountain of Youth: A tale of parabiosis, stem cells, and rejuvenation
  105. Regular Articles
  106. Foam sclerotherapy during shunt surgery for portal hypertension and varices
  107. Regular Articles
  108. Insomnia and depression: Japanese hospital workers questionnaire survey
  109. Regular Articles
  110. Serum NF-κBp65, TLR4 as biomarker for diagnosis of preeclampsia
  111. Regular Articles
  112. Docetaxel/cisplatin therapy in myasthenia gravis with hypertension/diabetes
  113. Regular Articles
  114. Fluid resuscitation and markers of glycocalyx degradation in severe sepsis
  115. Regular Articles
  116. Modified Sauve-Kapandji procedure for patients with old fractures of the distal radius
  117. Regular Articles
  118. Bile leakage after liver transplantation
  119. Regular Articles
  120. VEGF overexpression predicts poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma
  121. Regular Articles
  122. Galen vein aneurysm– challenge for treatment
  123. Regular Articles
  124. Retrieval of a broken sewing needle from the sacrum aided by a permanent magnet: a case report and literature review
  125. Regular Articles
  126. HIV/STI prevention interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
  127. Regular Articles
  128. Aortic aneurysm as a complication of myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis
  129. Regular Articles
  130. Real-time monitoring of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for radio frequency ablation
  131. Regular Articles
  132. Successful drug-eluting stent implantation in a male patient with dextrocardia: a case report
  133. Regular Articles
  134. Primary pleomorphic liposarcoma of fallopian tube with recurrence: a case report and review of the literature
  135. Regular Articles
  136. Color Doppler Ultrasound in Uterine Arterial Embolization
  137. Regular Articles
  138. Pattern of alcohol consumption by young people from North Eastern Portugal
  139. Regular Articles
  140. Effects of out-of-hospital continuing nursing on schizophrenia patients' rehabilitation and quality of life
Downloaded on 25.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2017-0036/html
Scroll to top button