Startseite Use of a simplified consent form to facilitate patient understanding of informed consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Artikel Open Access

Use of a simplified consent form to facilitate patient understanding of informed consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Alessandro Borello , Alessia Ferrarese EMAIL logo , Roberto Passera , Alessandra Surace , Silvia Marola , Claudio Buccelli , Massimo Niola , Pierpaolo Di Lorenzo , Maurizio Amato , Lorenza Di Domenico , Mario Solej und Valter Martino
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. Dezember 2016

Abstract

Background

Surgical informed consent forms can be complicated for patients to read and understand. We created a consent form with key information presented in bulleted texts and diagrams combined in a graphical format to facilitate the understanding of information during the verbal consent discussion.

Methods

This prospective, randomized study involved 70 adult patients awaiting cholecystectomy for gallstones. Consent was obtained after standard verbal explanation using either a graphically formatted (study group, n=33) or a standard text document (control group, n=37). Comprehension was evaluated with a 9-item multiple-choice questionnaire administered before surgery and factors affecting comprehension were analyzed.

Results

Comparison of questionnaire scores showed no effect of age, sex, time between consent and surgery, or document format on understanding of informed consent. Educational level was the only predictor of comprehension.

Conclusions

Simplified surgical consent documents meet the goals of health literacy and informed consent. Educational level appears to be a strong predictor of understanding.

1 Introduction

Informed consent refers to a voluntary decision and an authorization by a patient that a health care provider can proceed with diagnostic or therapeutic interventions as planned during the consent discussion. An integral component of the consent process, the consent discussion, is structured around the essential points of the procedure, associated side effects, reasonably predictable risks, benefits, and outcomes, as well as other treatment options [1].

Informed consent is now ethically and legally ensconced as the right of patients to receive adequate information to make decisions about proposed treatment and currently available alternative options in medical care [2]. This is a relatively recent concept in some areas of medicine, and reflects the gradual shift away from the paternalistic approach predominant up until the early 1960s when doctors believed that, by virtue of their superior medical knowledge, they could disregard patients’ choices and preferences or act against them if they ran counter to clinical indications. Surveys assessing health literacy in adults have found, however, that many people have a poor grasp of basic health concepts, medical information and instructions.

Other studies have shown that patients often have trouble to follow an explanation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures discussed during the consent consultation [3] and are able to recall little of what was explained [4]. Because surgical informed consent forms are complex for patients to read and understand, we created a two-page consent document with key information presented in bulleted texts and diagrams combined in a graphical format to facilitate understanding during the verbal consent process for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors potentially affecting comprehension, as assessed with a feedback questionnaire, were analyzed.

2 Material and methods

2.1 Study sample

In this prospective randomized study, 100 consecutive patients awaiting elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones on a day surgery basis were enrolled between 1 April 2013 and 1 April 2015. Exclusion criteria were: incapacity to read and understand the informed consent form unaided, emergency surgery, need for other surgical procedures in addition to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, refusal to participate in the study, non-Italian speakers or patients noted to have difficulty understanding or communicating in Italian, severe mental disorders, and incapacity to provide adequate informed consent. A single physician and member of the medical team collected the consent forms from all enrolled patients before hospital admission for surgery.

Of these 100 patients, 18 were excluded because they had undergone emergency surgery during the time between informed consent collection and the scheduled date of elective surgery; 12 others were excluded because they met one of the exclusion criteria listed above. The 70 remaining patients were assigned to one of two groups according to a computer-generated sequence (available at http://www.randomization.com). Of these 70 participants, 33 (47%) were men and 37 were women (52.9%). The median age was 55 years (range, 24-80); 37 (52.9%) patients were below and 33 (47.1%) were above the median age. The study group included 33 (47.1%) patients and the control group 37 (52.9%). The demographic characteristics were similar in both groups (Table 1).

Table 1

Patient characteristics.

CharacteristicNumber of patients (n=70)Study Group (n=33)Control Group (n=37)
Sex
Male, n° (%)33 (47.1)15 (45.4)18 (48.6)
Female n° (%)37 (52.9)18 (54.6)19 (51.4)
Age – average (yrs)545455
Median555555
Range24-8024-7835-80
≤5537 (52.9)16 (48.5)21 (56.7)
>5633 (47.1)17 (51.5)16 (43.3)
Educational level
Elementary n° (%)11 (15.7)4 (12.1)7 (18.9)
Middle school, n° (%)24 (34.3)11 (33.3)13 (35.1)
Technical-vocational, n° (%)10 (14.3)5 (15.1)5 (13.5)
High school, n° (%)19 (27.1)11 (33.3)8 (21.6)
College, n° (%)6(8.6)2(6.2)4 (10.8)
Time between consent and surgery (days)
Average23.423.422.9
Median121212
Range0-1520-1520-115
Δ Time ≤ 15, n° (%)39 (55.7)19 (57.6)20 (54.1)
Δ Time > 16, n° (%)31 (44.3)14 (42.4)17 (45.9)

2.2 Informed consent discussion

The informed consent discussion during surgical preadmission assessment covered the essential points regarding the pathology and its natural history, clinical course and common complications associated with gallstones, the reason for laparoscopic surgery and related risks and benefits, details about the surgical procedure, the potential surgical risks and reasonably predictable complications, the postoperative course, the diet to be followed during the first month after surgery, and aftercare of the surgical wound. Consent was obtained after the exposure to standard verbal explanation with either a simplified informed consent form (study group) or a standard text document (control group) routinely used in our unit for this purpose. The simplified consent form featured a clear layout and visual design elements, including ample margins and white space, short bulleted lists with topic headings, both medical and lay terms, anatomical diagrams and figures with descriptions and captions, and institutional logo (Fig. 1). Neither informed consent form has been tested for readability standards.

Figure 1 Simplified informed consent form
Figure 1

Simplified informed consent form

2.3 Feedback questionnaire

Comprehension was evaluated with a non-validated, 9-item multiple-choice questionnaire administered the day before surgery. The self-report multiple-choice questionnaire (each of the 9 questions had only one correct answer from 2-4 choices) examined understanding of informed consent regarding the operation itself (questions 1 to 4), potential surgical complications (questions 5 and 6), and length of hospital stay and postoperative care instructions (questions 7 to 9). An additional final question (item 10 had only a yes/no response) investigated patient satisfaction with the clarity of the presentation and the amount of information given (Fig. 2). Physicians that obtained the consent forms also collected completed questionnaires.

Figure 2 Feedback questionnaire
Figure 2

Feedback questionnaire

Patient age, sex, educational level, time between consent and questionnaire collection, and questionnaire scores were entered into a database for analysis. Eleven (15.7%) patients had completed elementary school, 24 (34.3%) middle school, 10 (14.3%) technical-vocational school, 19 (27.1) high school, and 6 (8.6%) college level education. The average time between consent and collection of the feedback questionnaire was 23.4 days (median 12 days, range 0 to 152); the time interval was less than 15 days for 39 (55.7%) patients and more than 16 days for the remaining 31 (44.3%).

2.4 Statistical analysis

Univariate descriptive analysis was applied to categorical and continuous variables, followed by bivariate descriptive analysis of the categorical variables, interferential analysis of the categorical variables (two-sided Monte Carlo and Fisher’s exact test), and a multivariate binary logistic regression model (odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals). Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

3 Results

The correct response rate was 100% on all 9 questionnaire items for 20 out of 70 patients: 11/33 (33.3%) in the study group and 9/37 (24.3%) in the control group; 23 responded incorrectly to 1 item (11 [33.3%] in the study group vs. 12 [32.4%] in the control group); 17 responded incorrectly to 2 items (7 [21.2%] in the study group vs. 10 [27.1%] in the control group); 8 responded incorrectly to 3 items (3 [9.1%] in the study group vs. 5 [13.5%] in the control group); 2 responded incorrectly to 4 items (1 [3.1%] in the study group vs. 1 [2.7%] in the control group). The percentage of correct responses to the first 5 items investigating understanding of the operation was generally high in both groups: 97% and 100% to item 1, 96.9% and 97.3% to item 2, 93.9% and 94.6% to item 3, 93.9% and 100% to item 4, and 90.9% and 100% to item 5 in the study and the control group, respectively.

By comparison, the correct response rate was lowest for item 6 (probability of surgical complications), with 57.6% and 62.1% in the study and the control group, respectively, responding incorrectly. The correct response rate improved on items 7 to 9 (length of hospital stay and postoperative care instructions): 78.8% vs. 67.6%, 90.9% vs. 75.7%, and 100% vs. 89.2% in the study and the control group, respectively. All patients stated that they were satisfied with the way they were informed and the clarity of the information provided irrespective of whether they had been exposed to verbal consent with the standard text or with the simplified graphically enhanced document (Table 2).

Table 2

Feedback questionnaire items and number and percentage of patients who responded correctly or incorrectly.

N° of patients (n=70)Study Group (n=33)Control Group (n=37)
Question 1. Surgery is performed using a/an: Laparoscopic approach

Open subcostal incision
Correct, n(%)69 (98.6)32 (97)37 (100)
Incorrect, n° (%)1 (1.4)1 (3)0 (0)
Question 2. Laparoscopic surgery involves: Placing a subcostal incision to expose the gallbladder and remove it

Creating minimally invasive accesses to the abdomen for the instruments
Correct, n° (%)68 (97.1)32 (96.9)36 (97.3)
Incorrect, n° (%)2 (2.9)1 (3.1)1 (2.7)
Question 3. Which type of anesthesia is given? General

Local

Spinal
Correct, n° (%)66 (94.3)31 (93.9)35 (94.6)
Incorrect, n° (%)4(5.7)2 (6.1)2 (5.4)
Question 4. What will be removed? The gallbladder

Only the gallstones
Correct, n° (%)68 (97.1)31 (93.9)37 (100)
Incorrect, n° (%)2 (2.9)2(6.1)0 (0)
Question 5. If technical or anatomical problems arise, can the procedure be converted from laparoscopic to subcostal incision? Yes

No
Correct, n° (%)67 (95.7)30 (90.9)37 (100)
Incorrect, n° (%)3(4.3)3 (9.1)0 (0)
Question 6. What kind of complications may occur? Vascular injury

Intestinal injury

Biliary duct injury

All of the above
Correct, n° (%)28 (40.0)14 (42.4)14 (37.8)
Incorrect, n° (%)42 (60.0)19 (57.6)23 (62.1)
Question 7. How long is the average length of stay in the hospital? 24-48 hours

3-5 days

7-10 days
Correct, n° (%)51 (72.9)26 (78.8)25 (67.6)
Incorrect, n° (%)19 (27.1)7 (21.2)12 (32.4)
Question 8. What kind of diet should be followed after the operation? No restrictions

A light diet for the first 10-15 days

A light diet for the first 3-6 months

A restricted diet indefinitely
Correct, n° (%)58 (82.9)30 (90.9)28 (75.7)
Incorrect, n° (%)12 (17.1)3 (9.1)9 (24.3)
Question 9. What kind of food should be avoided the first days after the operation? Sugar

Protein

Fat
Correct, n° (%)66 (94.3)33 (100)33 (89.2)
Incorrect, n° (%)4(5.7)0 (0)4 (10.8)
Question 10. Was the explanation of the operation and possible complications sufficiently clear?
Yes70 (100.0)33 (100)37 (100)
No0(0.0)0 (0)0 (0)
Number of errors
0, n° (%)20 (28.6)11 (33.3)9 (24.3)
1, n° (%)23 (32.9)11 (33.3)12 (32.4)
2, n° (%)17 (24.3)7 (21.2)10 (27.1)
3, n° (%)8 (11.4)3 (9.1)5 (13.5)
4, n° (%)2 (2.9)1 (3.1)1 (2.7)

Univariate and bivariate analysis of the categorical variables (age, sex, educational level, time between consent and surgery) showed that none of these were statistically significant as a predictor of understanding consent nor did exposure to the standard text or graphically formatted consent document predict better understanding (Table 3). Multivariate binary logistic regression (odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals) of these variables showed that, independent of type of exposure, educational level had a statistically significant effect on reducing the risk of responding incorrectly by the patients in both groups who had completed high school or college (P = 0.035 and P = 0.043, respectively) (Table 4).

Table 3

Results of interferential analysis of the categorical variables (two-sided Monte Carlo and Fisher’s exact test).

CharacteristicNumber of patients n=70 (%)Study Group n=33 (%)Control Group n=37 (%)Univariate Analysis Chi-Square Tests p-value
Gender0.381
Male33 (47.1)15 (45.4)18 (48.6)
Female37 (52.9)18 (54.6)19 (51.4)
Age (yrs)0.260
≤5537 (52.9)16 (48.5)21 (56.7)
>5633 (47.1)17 (51.5)16 (43.3)
Educational level0.285
Elementary11 (15.7)4 (12.1)7 (18.9)
Middle school24 (34.3)11 (33.3)13 (35.1)
Technical-vocational10 (14.3)5 (15.1)5 (13.5)
High school19 (27.1)11 (33.3)8 (21.6)
College6 (8.6)2 (6.2)4 (10.8)
Time between consent and surgery (days)0.567
Δ Time ≤ 1539 (55.7)19 (57.6)20 (54.1)
Δ Time > 1631 (44.3)14 (42.4)17 (45.9)
Type of consent70 (100)33(100)37(100)0.905
Table 4

Results of multivariate binary logistic regression analysis comparing the factors affecting the probability of making errors: 0 errors (20 patients) vs. ≥ error (50 patients).

VariableOdds Ratio (95% confidence interval)P value
Age (yrs) >56 vs. ≤ 551.58 (0.4-6.22)0.515
Study group vs. Control group0.71 (0.22-2.27)0.560
Female vs. Male0.46 (0.14-1.52)0.203
Δ Time between consent and feedback questionnaire (days) >16 vs. ≤150.79 (0.25-2.56)0.698
Educational level0.048
Middle vs. Elementary0.5 (0.05-5.08)0.558
Technical-vocational vs. Elementary0.4 (0.03-5.25)0.485
High vs. Elementary0.09 (0.01-0.85)0.035
College vs. Elementary0.1 (0.01-1.35)0.043

4 Discussion

Like the trust that underlies the doctor-patient relationship, informed consent can be viewed as both an event and a process [5]. It begins with the preoperative encounter and continues through to the postoperative evaluation of treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction.

In a questionnaire study, Akkad et al. [6] found, however, that patients often had a limited understanding of the legal implications of signing an informed consent form and that they did not recognize the fact that informed consent works in their interest: 46% stated that informed consent serves to protect the doctor’s interest. The authors concluded that the current informed consent process is inadequate and its ethical validity and credibility are questionable.

Health literacy surveys have underlined the need to provide medical information in plain language in order to bridge the knowledge gap between doctor and patient. Kusec et al. [7] reported that the complexity of presenting concepts could be graded according to patient characteristics by aiming for a balanced choice between medical and lay terms adjusted to the patient’s educational level, for example. By the same token, not all patients have a desire of being fully informed about clinical aspects, therapy, common complications, and treatment outcomes.

Degerliyurt et al. [8] found a wide variability in the amount of information about therapy and potential complications that patients want to know: 57% of the patients in their study stated they wanted to be fully informed about all the complications associated with their surgical treatment, 33% wanted to know only the most common complications, and 10% did not want to be informed. Despite these discrepancies, the authors recommended that patients receive a standard informed consent form.

In a systematic review of the literature, Falagas et al. [9] found that less than one third of the studies they reviewed reported that patients had adequately understood of the components of the informed consent process. Although the majority of the patients felt that the amount of information they had received was adequate, the actual degree of understanding was suboptimal.

There are now various methods and strategies to simplify consent forms and improve comprehension with the aid of especially designed written or multimedia material being used during the informed consent process in clinical trials. The general agreement is that the use of such materials may increase patient understanding of informed consent [10-16]. Multimedia presentations have been effectively implemented in education to increase learning, interest, memory, comprehension, and satisfaction. Hung et al. [17] reported that the use of multimedia disclosure of informed consent does not significantly increase hospital costs. Not all authors agree that multimedia use necessarily improves patients’ informed consent understanding, however. Clark et al. [18] reported that PowerPoint presentations illustrating laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not increase the degree of patient understanding. Other authors have suggested that a consent discussion following a checklist of essential concepts is sufficient to obtain good understanding of consent [19] or that repeat back of concepts and repetition of the points not clearly understood can also help to improve understanding [20]. What has been consistently shown is that an increased understanding of the surgical procedure can increase satisfaction with treatment received and reduce perioperative anxiety [21-24] despite of the inherent difficulties of surgical procedures [25-44].

In our study, comparison of feedback questionnaire scores revealed no statistically significant difference in informed consent understanding between the two groups. This finding contrasts with previously published data [10-16]. We agree with Clark et al. [18] and Kondziolka [19] who demonstrated that the addition of educational material to the standard verbal consent process does not improve patient understanding of the risks and benefits associated with surgery. Like Falagas et al. [8], we noted that although the majority of patients felt that the amount of information received was adequate, their actual understanding was low: only 28.6% of the patients responded correctly to all 9 questionnaire items, though both groups stated they were satisfied with the clarity with which the information was presented.

Laparoscopic surgery seems to give greater difficulties in intervention explanation perhaps because of technology that can not be understood by all types of patients . [45-57]. Further to this, since the literature is scarce on the effects of simplifying informed consent forms in the clinical setting, we analyzed several variables that might correlate with patient understanding. Age, sex, and time between consent and questionnaire administration were not found to be statistically significant predictors of increased understanding. The only factor that had a statistically significant effect on reducing the risk of responding incorrectly to a questionnaire item was educational level (P = 0.048 on multivariate analysis). This was particularly evident for the patients with a high school (P = 0.035 on multivariate analysis) or college education (P = 0.043 on multivariate analysis) in both groups. This finding is in line with observations by Kusec et al. [7] and suggests that the complexity of medical information can be appropriately graded in patients with a higher educational level.

That said, we believe that, irrespective of exposure to a standard verbal consent procedures or to a consent process with a simplified, graphically formatted consent document, understanding informed consent is influenced by a patient’s health literacy. Voluntariness and interest in their health condition may help patients retain the concepts discussed with their surgeon during the consent process and prompt them to ask for the information they feel is important when faced with decisions about their health.

Sources of funding

All authors have no source of funding to declare.

  1. Potential and real conflicts of interest: All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

[1] Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Ferrarese A., Pozzi G., Borghi F., Pellegrino L., Di Lorenzo P., Amato B., Santangelo M., Niola M., Martino V., Capasso E., Informed consent in robotic surgery: quality of information and patient perception. Open Med. 2016; 11 (1): 279-28510.1515/med-2016-0054Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] Chate RAC. An audit of the level of knowledge and understanding of informed consent amongst consultant orthodontists in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Br Dent J 2008; 205:1210.1038/sj.bdj.2008.1043Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Scheer AS, O’Connor AM, Chan BP et al. The myth of informed consent in rectal cancer surgery: what do patients retain?. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55(9):970-97510.1097/DCR.0b013e31825f2479Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Bernat JL, Peterson LM. Patient-Centered Informed Consent in Surgical Practice. Arch Surg 2006; 141:86-9210.1001/archsurg.141.1.86Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Akkad A, Jackson C, Kenyon S et al. Patients’ perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study. BMJ 2006; 333:52810.1136/bmj.38922.516204.55Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Kusec S, Oreskovic S, Skegro M. Improving comprehension of informed consent. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 60:294-30010.1016/j.pec.2005.10.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Degerliyurt K, Laskin DM. Informed Consent: What Do Patients Really Want to Know? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68:1849-5210.1016/j.joms.2010.04.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Falagas ME, Korbila IP. Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? Am J Surg 2009; 198:420-44310.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.02.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Bollschweiler E, Apitzsch J. Improving Informed Consent of Surgical Patients Using a Multimedia-Based Program? Results of a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study of Patients Before Cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 2008; 248:210.1097/SLA.0b013e318180a3a7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Tompsett E. Can video aids increase the validity of patient consent? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 32:680-68210.3109/01443615.2012.698329Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Ibrahim T, Meng Ong S. The new consent form: is it any better?. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004; 86:206-20910.1308/003588404323043364Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Wang C, Ammon P, Beischer AD. The use of multimedia as an adjunct to the informed consent process for Morton’s neuroma resection surgery. Foot Ankle Int 2014; 35(10):1037-104410.1177/1071100714543644Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Batuyong ED, Jowett AJ, Wickramasinghe N et al. Using multimedia to enhance the consent process for bunion correction surgery. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84(4):249-25410.1111/ans.12534Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Sherlock A, Brownie S. Patients’ recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg 2014; 84(4):207-21010.1111/ans.12555Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Nehme J, El-Khani U, Chow A, et al. The use of multimedia consent programs or surgical procedures: a systematic review. Surg Innov 2013; 20(1):13-2310.1177/1553350612446352Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Hung S, Huang K. An empirical study of the effectiveness of multimedia disclosure of informed consent: A technology mediated learning perspective. Inf Manage 2011; 48:135-14410.1016/j.im.2011.03.002Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Clark S, Mangram A. The Informed Consent: A Study of the Efficacy of Informed Consents and the Associated Role of Language Barriers. J Surg Educ 2011; 1931-720410.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Kondziolka DS. Improving the informed consent process for surgery. Neurosurgery 2006; 58:1184-118910.1227/01.NEU.0000215958.26175.EASuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Fink AS, Prochazka AV, Henderson WG, et al. Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2010; 252(1):27-3610.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e3ec61Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Mulsow JJ, Feeley TM, Tierney S. Beyond consent-improving understanding in surgical patients. Am J Surg 2012; 203(1):112-12010.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Betti S, Sironi A, Saino G, et al. Effect of the informed consent process on anxiety and comprehension of patients undergoing esophageal and gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15(6):922-92710.1007/s11605-011-1517-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Moseley TH, Wiggins MN, O’Sullivan P. Effects of presentation method on the understanding of informed consent. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90:990-99310.1136/bjo.2006.092650Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Fink AS, Prochazka AV, Henderson WG, et al. Predictors of comprehension during surgical informed consent. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210(6):919-92610.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.049Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Azoulay D, Castaing D, Dennison A et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt worsens the hyperdynamic circulatory state of the cirrhotic patient: preliminary report of a prospective study. Hepatology 1994 Jan; 19(1):129-13210.1002/hep.1840190121Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Pozzi G, Ferrarese A, Busso M et al. Percutaneous drainage and sclerosis of mesenteric cysts: literature overview and report of an innovative approach. Int J Surg 2014; 12 Suppl 2:S90-9310.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.372Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Ferrarese A, Marola S, Surace A et al. Fibrin glue versus stapler fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal inguinal hernia repair: a single center 5-year experience and analysis of the results in the elderly. Int J Surg 2014; 12 Suppl 2:S94-9810.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.371Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Surace A, Marola S, Benvenga R, et al. Difficult abdominal access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: our experience and literature review. Int J Surg 2014; 12 Suppl 2:S1-310.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.369Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Polistena A., Di Lorenzo P., Sanguinetti A., Buccelli C., Conzo G., Conti A., Niola M., Avenia N. Medicolegal implications of surgical errors and complications in neck surgery: a review based on the Italian current legislation. Open Med. 2016; 11 (1): 298-30610.1515/med-2016-0058Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Gentile V, Ferrarese A, Marola S, et al. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes of perforated diverticulitis Hinchey II and III: open Hartmann’s procedure vs. laparoscopic lavage and drainage in the elderly. Int J Surg 2014; 12 Suppl 2:S86-8910.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.373Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Martino V, Ferrarese A, Borello A et al. An unusual evolution of a case of Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome. Open Med.2015; 10:498-50110.1515/med-2015-0084Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Sandrucci S, Garrone C, Mobiglia C et al. Evaluation of the toxicity induced in rat by the intra-arterial cytostatic infusion and by hepatic dearterialization associated with systemic cytostatic therapy. Bollettino e Memorie della Societa Piemontese di Chirurgia 1989; 59(2):65-77Suche in Google Scholar

[33] Muzio S, Cassini P, Martino V et al. Transcystic videolaparoscopy for choledocholithiasis with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. A case report. Chir Ital 2008 Jan-Feb; 60(1):119-123Suche in Google Scholar

[34] Serra R, Grande R, Butrico L et al. Effects of a new nutraceutical substance on clinical and molecular parameters in patients with chronic venous ulceration. Int Wound J 2016 Feb; 13(1):88-9610.1111/iwj.12240Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Surace A, Ferrarese A, Benvenga R et al. ACTH-secreting neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor: a case report. Int J Surg 2014; 12 Suppl 1:S222-22410.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.035Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Ferrarese A, Borello A, Gentile V, et al. Meso-pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Int J Surg 2014; 12 Suppl 1:S123-12510.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.031Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Serra R, Gallelli L, Conti A, et al. The effects of sulodexide on both clinical and molecular parameters in patients with mixed arterial and venous ulcers of lower limbs. Drug Des Devel Ther 2014 May; 13;8:519-52710.2147/DDDT.S61770Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Priola AM, Priola SM, Volpicelli G, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector CT in the diagnosis of surgically treated acute abdomen. Clin Imaging 2013 Sep-Oct; 37(5):902-90710.1016/j.clinimag.2013.02.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] Ferrarese A, Enrico S, Solej M et al. Laparoscopic management of non-midline incisional hernia: A multicentric study. Int J Surg 2016 Jun 21; pii: S1743-9191(16)30181-9. doi: 0.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.023. [Epub ahead of print]Suche in Google Scholar

[40] Surace A, Ferrarese A, Marola S et al. Endorectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of rectal cancer: accuracy and criticies. Int J Surg 2014; 12 Suppl 2:S99-10210.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.370Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[41] Berti S, Ferrarese A, Feleppa C, et al. Laparoscopic perspectives for distal biliary obstruction. Int J Surg 2015 Sep; 21 Suppl 1:S64-6710.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.092Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[42] Surace A, Ferrarese A, Marola S et al. Abdominal compartment syndrome and open abdomen management with negative pressure devices. Ann Ital Chir. 2015 Jan-Feb; 86(1):46-50Suche in Google Scholar

[43] Ferrarese A, Falcone A, Solej M et al. Surgeon’s clinical valuation and accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: A comparison with intraoperative evaluation. Five years experienceSuche in Google Scholar

[44] Marola S, Ferrarese A, Solej M et al. Management of venous ulcers: State of the art. Int J Surg 2016 Jun 21; in press10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.06.015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Allaix ME, Giraudo G, FerrareseA, et al. 10-Year Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic or Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. World J Surg 2016 Jul 14; in press10.1007/s00268-016-3631-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Eretta C, Ferrarese A, Olcese S, et al. Celiac axis compression syndrome: laparoscopic approach in a strange case of Chronic abdominal pain in 71 years old man. Open Med 2016; 11: In press10.1515/med-2016-0049Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[47] Nano M, Martino V, Ferrarese A, Falcone A. A brief history of laparoscopy. G Chir 2012; (33); 3:53-57Suche in Google Scholar

[48] Martino V, Ferrarese A, Bindi M, et al. Abnormal right hepatic artery injury resulting in right hepatic atrophy: diagnosed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Open Med 2015; 10:535-53710.1515/med-2015-0090Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[49] Ferrarese A, Pozzi G, Borghi F, et al. Malfunctions of robotic system in surgery: role and responsibility of surgeon in legal point of view. Open Med 2016; 11: In press10.1515/med-2016-0055Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[50] Ferrarese A, Pozzi G, Borghi F, et al. Informed consent in robotic surgery: quality of information and patient perception. Open Med 2016; 11: In press10.1515/med-2016-0054Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[51] Ferrarese A, Solej M, Enrico S, et al. Elective and emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: our experience. BMC Surg 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S2110.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S21Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[52] Ferrarese A, Solej M, Enrico S, et al. Diagnosis of incidental gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience. BMC Surg 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S2010.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S20Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[53] Ferrarese A, Enrico S, Solej M, et al.Transabdominal pre-peritoneal mesh in inguinal hernia repair in elderly: end point of our experience. BMC Surg 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S2410.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S24Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Ferrarese A, Martino V, Enrico S et al. Laparoscopic repair of wound defects in the elderly: our experience of 5 years. BMC Surg 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S2310.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S23Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[55] Ferrarese A, Martino V, Enrico S, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly: our experience. BMC Surg 2013; 13 Suppl 2:S2210.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S22Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[56] Solej M, Martino V, Mao P, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Minerva Chir 2012 Oct; 67(5):381-387Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Ferrarese A, Martino V, Falcone A, et al. Diverticoli duodenali perforati: caso clinico e breve review della letteratura. Chirurgia 2014 Aprile; 27(2):129-131Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-10-10
Accepted: 2016-10-31
Published Online: 2016-12-16
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

© 2016 Alessandro Borello et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Article
  2. The possible molecular regulation mechanism of CIK cells inhibiting the proliferation of Human Lung Adenocarcinoma NCL-H157 Cells
  3. Case Report
  4. Urethral stone of unexpected size: case report and short literature review
  5. Case Report
  6. Complete remission through icotinib treatment in Non-small cell lung cancer epidermal growth factor receptor mutation patient with brain metastasis: A case report
  7. Research Article
  8. FPL tendon thickness, tremor and hand functions in Parkinson’s disease
  9. Research Article
  10. Diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells in cerebrospinal fluid
  11. Research Article
  12. A meta-analysis of neuroprotective effect for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the treatment of glaucoma
  13. Research Article
  14. MiR-218 increases sensitivity to cisplatin in esophageal cancer cells via targeting survivin expression
  15. Research Article
  16. Association of HOTAIR expression with PI3K/Akt pathway activation in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
  17. Research Article
  18. The role of interleukin genes in the course of depression
  19. Case Report
  20. A rare case of primary pulmonary diffuse large B cell lymphoma with CD5 positive expression
  21. Research Article
  22. DWI and SPARCC scoring assess curative effect of early ankylosing spondylitis
  23. Research Article
  24. The diagnostic value of serum CEA, NSE and MMP-9 for on-small cell lung cancer
  25. Case Report
  26. Dysphonia – the single symptom of rifampicin resistant laryngeal tuberculosis
  27. Review Article
  28. Development of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M. Mutation in non small-cell lung carcinoma
  29. Research Article
  30. Negative regulation of CDC42 expression and cell cycle progression by miR-29a in breast cancer
  31. Research Article
  32. Expression analysis of the TGF-β/SMAD target genes in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
  33. Research Article
  34. Blood cells in thyroid cancer patients: a possible influence of apoptosis
  35. Research Article
  36. Detected EGFR mutation in cerebrospinal fluid of lung adenocarcinoma patients with meningeal metastasis
  37. Mini-review
  38. Pathogenesis-oriented approaches for the management of corticosteroid-resistant or relapsedprimary immune thrombocytopenia
  39. Research Article
  40. GSTP1 A>G polymorphism and chemosensitivity of osteosarcoma: A meta-analysis
  41. Research Article
  42. A meta-analysis of adiponectin gene rs22411766 T>G polymorphism and ischemic stroke susceptibility
  43. Research Article
  44. The diagnosis and pathological value of combined detection of HE4 and CA125 for patients with ovarian cancer
  45. Research Article
  46. SOX7 inhibits tumor progression of glioblastoma and is regulated by miRNA-24
  47. Research Article
  48. Sevoflurane affects evoked electromyography monitoring in cerebral palsy
  49. Case Report
  50. A case report of hereditary spherocytosis with concomitant chronic myelocytic leukemia
  51. Case Report
  52. A case of giant saphenous vein graft aneurysm followed serially after coronary artery bypass surgery
  53. Research Article
  54. LncRNA TUG1 is upregulated and promotes cell proliferation in osteosarcoma
  55. Review Article
  56. Meningioma recurrence
  57. Case Report
  58. Endobronchial amyloidosis mimicking bronchial asthma: a case report and review of the literature
  59. Case Report
  60. A confusing case report of pulmonary langerhans cell histiocytosis and literature review
  61. Research Article
  62. Effect of hesperetin on chaperone activity in selenite-induced cataract
  63. Research Article
  64. Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
  65. Research Article
  66. Correlation analysis of VHL and Jade-1 gene expression in human renal cell carcinoma
  67. Research Article
  68. Is acute appendicitis still misdiagnosed?
  69. Retraction
  70. Retraction of: application of food-specific IgG antibody detection in allergy dermatosis
  71. Review Article
  72. Platelet Rich Plasma: a short overview of certain bioactive components
  73. Research Article
  74. Correlation between CTLA-4 gene rs221775A>G single nucleotide polymorphism and multiple sclerosis susceptibility. A meta-analysis
  75. Review Article
  76. Standards of anesthesiology practice during neuroradiological interventions
  77. Research Article
  78. Expression and clinical significance of LXRα and SREBP-1c in placentas of preeclampsia
  79. Letter to the Editor
  80. ARDS diagnosed by SpO2/FiO2 ratio compared with PaO2/FiO2 ratio: the role as a diagnostic tool for early enrolment into clinical trials
  81. Research Article
  82. Impact of sensory integration training on balance among stroke patients: sensory integration training on balance among stroke patients
  83. Review Article
  84. MicroRNAs as regulatory elements in psoriasis
  85. Review Article
  86. Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and postpandemic influenza in Lithuania
  87. Review Article
  88. Garengeot’s hernia: two case reports with CT diagnosis and literature review
  89. Research Article
  90. Concept of experimental preparation for treating dentin hypersensitivity
  91. Research Article
  92. Hydrogen water reduces NSE, IL-6, and TNF-α levels in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
  93. Research Article
  94. Xanthogranuloma of the sellar region diagnosed by frozen section
  95. Case Report
  96. Laparoscopic antegrade cholecystectomy: a standard procedure?
  97. Case Report
  98. Maxillary fibrous dysplasia associated with McCune-Albright syndrome. A case study
  99. Regular Article
  100. Sialoendoscopy, sialography, and ultrasound: a comparison of diagnostic methods
  101. Research Article
  102. Antibody Response to Live Attenuated Vaccines in Adults in Japan
  103. Conference article
  104. Excellence and safety in surgery require excellent and safe tutoring
  105. Conference article
  106. Suggestions on how to make suboptimal kidney transplantation an ethically viable option
  107. Regular Article
  108. Ectopic pregnancy treatment by combination therapy
  109. Conference article
  110. Use of a simplified consent form to facilitate patient understanding of informed consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  111. Regular Article
  112. Cusum analysis for learning curve of videothoracoscopic lobectomy
  113. Regular Article
  114. A meta-analysis of association between glutathione S-transferase M1 gene polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease susceptibility
  115. Conference article
  116. Plastination: ethical and medico-legal considerations
  117. Regular Article
  118. Investigation and control of a suspected nosocomial outbreak of pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in an intensive care unit
  119. Regular Article
  120. Multifactorial analysis of fatigue scale among nurses in Poland
  121. Regular Article
  122. Smoking cessation for free: outcomes of a study of three Romanian clinics
  123. Regular Article
  124. Clinical efficacy and safety of tripterygium glycosides in treatment of stage IV diabetic nephropathy: A meta-analysis
  125. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  126. Prevention and treatment of peritoneal adhesions in patients affected by vascular diseases following surgery: a review of the literature
  127. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  128. Surgical treatment of recidivist lymphedema
  129. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  130. CT and MR imaging of the thoracic aorta
  131. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  132. Role of FDG-PET scan in staging of pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
  133. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  134. Sternal reconstruction by extracellular matrix: a rare case of phaces syndrome
  135. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  136. Prenatal diagnosis, 3-D virtual rendering and lung sparing surgery by ligasure device in a baby with “CCAM and intralobar pulmonary sequestration”
  137. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  138. Serum levels of inhibin B in adolescents after varicocelelectomy: A long term follow up
  139. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  140. Our experience in the treatment of Malignant Fibrous Hystiocytoma of the larynx: clinical diagnosis, therapeutic approach and review of literature
  141. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  142. Delayed recurrent nerve paralysis following post-traumatic aortic pseudoaneurysm
  143. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  144. Integrated therapeutic approach to giant solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura: report of a case and review of the literature
  145. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  146. Celiac axis compression syndrome: laparoscopic approach in a strange case of chronic abdominal pain in 71 years old man
  147. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  148. A rare case of persistent hypoglossal artery associated with contralateral proximal subclavian stenosis
  149. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  150. Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in Non-BRCA-Mutated patients
  151. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  152. Professional dental and oral surgery liability in Italy: a comparative analysis of the insurance products offered to health workers
  153. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  154. Informed consent in robotic surgery: quality of information and patient perception
  155. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  156. Malfunctions of robotic system in surgery: role and responsibility of surgeon in legal point of view
  157. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  158. Medicolegal implications of surgical errors and complications in neck surgery: A review based on the Italian current legislation
  159. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  160. Iatrogenic splenic injury: review of the literature and medico-legal issues
  161. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  162. Donation of the body for scientific purposes in Italy: ethical and medico-legal considerations
  163. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  164. Cosmetic surgery: medicolegal considerations
  165. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  166. Voluntary termination of pregnancy (medical or surgical abortion): forensic medicine issues
  167. Review Article
  168. Role of Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Elderly Immune Thrombocytopenia
  169. Review Article
  170. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive system
  171. Review Article
  172. Efficacy and safety of splenectomy in adult autoimmune hemolytic anemia
  173. Research Article
  174. Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and Ph nose and salivary: proposal of a simple method outpatient in patients adults
  175. Case Report
  176. Idiopathic pleural panniculitis with recurrent pleural effusion not associated with Weber-Christian disease
  177. Research Article
  178. Morbid Obesity: treatment with Bioenterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB), psychological and nursing care: our experience
  179. Research Article
  180. Learning curve for endorectal ultrasound in young and elderly: lights and shades
  181. Case Report
  182. Uncommon primary hydatid cyst occupying the adrenal gland space, treated with laparoscopic surgical approach in an old patient
  183. Research Article
  184. Distraction techniques for face and smile aesthetic preventing ageing decay
  185. Research Article
  186. Preoperative high-intensity training in frail old patients undergoing pulmonary resection for NSCLC
  187. Review Article
  188. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis in the elderly patients
  189. Research Article
  190. Prophylactic GSV surgery in elderly candidates for hip or knee arthroplasty
  191. Research Article
  192. Diagnostic yield and safety of C-TBNA in elderly patients with lung cancer
  193. Research Article
  194. The learning curve of laparoscopic holecystectomy in general surgery resident training: old age of the patient may be a risk factor?
  195. Research Article
  196. Self-gripping mesh versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective clinical trial in young and elderly patients
  197. Research Article
  198. Anal sphincter dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: an observation manometric study
Heruntergeladen am 18.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2016-0092/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen