Startseite Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in Non-BRCA-Mutated patients
Artikel Open Access

Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in Non-BRCA-Mutated patients

  • Giuseppe Falco , Nicola Rocco EMAIL logo , Daniele Bordoni , Luigi Marano , Antonello Accurso , Claudio Buccelli , Pierpaolo Di Lorenzo , Emanuele Capasso , Fabio Policino , Massimo Niola und Guglielmo Ferrari
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. August 2016

Abstract

The use of contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM) is indicated in women affected by breast cancer, who are at high risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer, particularly women with genetic mutation of BRCA1, BRCA2 and P53. However we should consider that the genes described above account for only 20-30% of the excess familiar risk. What is contralaterally indicated when genetic assessment results negative for mutation in a young patient with unilateral breast cancer? Is it ethically correct to remove a contralateral “healthy” breast? CRRM rates continue to rise all over the world although CRRM seems not to improve overall survival in women with unilateral sporadic breast cancer. The decision to pursue CRRM as part of treatment in women who have a low-to-moderate risk of developing a secondary cancer in the contralateral breast should consider both breast cancer individual-features and patients preferences, but should be not supported by the surgeon and avoided as first approach with the exception of women highly worried about cancer. Prospective studies are needed to identify cohorts of patients most likely to benefit from CRRM.

1 Introduction

Breast cancer represent the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States [1] and the UK [2]. Although it regards predominantly older women, approximately 12% of new breast cancer cases occur in women younger than 45 years [3]. Younger age is usually related with more aggressive and less responsive tumours and consequently with lower survival rates, higher recurrence rates, and negative prognostic variables [4-6]. Therapeutic interventions include chemotherapy, hormone-therapies and surgery with or without radiotherapy. Systemic treatments impact on fertility prompting early menopause and ovarian decline [7]. Higher depression rates with effect on family life are also reported in these patients [8]. Refer to surgery could be cause of a negative body image that influence post-operative quality of life. Breast surgery includes breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiation-therapy (RT) for early breast cancer or unilateral mastectomy (UM). BCS with RT and UM survival rates are equivalent [9], but preserving the breast, considering an oncoplastic technique could achieve better satisfaction levels and improve post-operative quality of life. Recently, however, numerous papers revealed a consistent growth in the use of both UM and contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM) [10,11]. CRRM consist in a so-called conservative mastectomy, the Nipple Areola Complex-Sparing Mastectomy that preserve the native breast skin and the nipple-areola complex, resulting in improved aesthetic results with local recurrence rates comparable to the traditional modified radical mastectomy [12]. The use of UM and CRRM is indicated in women affected by breast cancer, who are at high risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer (CBC), particularly women with genetic mutation of BRCA1, BRCA2 and P53. However, we should consider that the genes described above account for only 20-30% of the excess familial risk [13,14]. Consequently, the genetic etiology for the majority of families with an increased familial breast cancer risk remains unknown. Young age at diagnosis is a feature of hereditary disease and it is currently suggested that all women diagnosed with breast cancer younger than 37 should be referred for genetic assessment. But what is indicated in the contralateral breast when genetic assessment results are negative for mutation in a young patient with unilateral breast cancer? Is it ethically correct to remove a contralateral “healthy” breast?

2 Literature search

We reviewed PubMed database using the keywords “contralateral breast cancer”, “contralateral prophylactic mastectomy” and “contralateral risk reducing mastectomy”. We included only articles in English focused on contralateral mastectomy in women who presented a low-to-moderate risk of developing a secondary cancer in the contralateral breast. We considered as low-to-moderate risk patients, all women with a unilateral breast cancer in young age without a genetic mutation of BRCA1, BRCA2, P53 and without an evidence of strong familiarity for breast cancer. All papers reporting BRCA gene mutation carriers and other high-risk women have been excluded.

3 Results

Between January 1, 2005 and March 1, 2016 more than 300 papers were retrieved. Only 10% of retrieved papers addressed the impact of contralateral risk reducing mastectomy on overall survival [16-31]. Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy is estimated to reduce the risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer by approximately 94% [15]. Some studies showed a disease free survival (DSF) benefit associated with CRRM, but not an overall survival benefit [25,29].

4 Discussion

As a preventive measure, CRRM in women with low-to-moderate risk of developing a secondary cancer in contralateral breast remains controversial and potential benefits and disadvantages need to be discussed. The risk of mortality from contralateral disease must always be weighed against risk of mortality from primary tumour metastases, without an overall survival benefit. Different studies in fact showed as patients prognosis is strongly related to the features of their first breast cancer [32-34]. Moreover, mastectomy does not remove all breast tissue and therefore cannot eliminate risk of breast cancer at all, even if this surgery is shown to be effective in reducing risk. Presently, we are participating in a serious paradox: “a lesser surgical procedure is always more used in patients with an invasive breast cancer thanks to the screening program that allows an early detection of small cancer while mastectomy is offered in healthy breast for cancer prevention [32]”. In addition, there is no demonstrated survival benefit [35] and CRRM may cause significant physical morbidity: complication including infection, nipple areola complex necrosis, bleeding with a reoperation rate up to 16% of patients [36]. Chronic pain and unsatisfactory aesthetic results are also been reported respectively up to 50% and 84% of the CRRM affecting irreparably post-operative quality of life [37,38]. Women should be thoroughly informed about achievable outcomes in breast reconstructive surgery when considering undergoing risk reducing procedures. On the other side, CRRM in non affected breast have potential benefits connected with the reduction of both risk of cancer and anxiety patient. Given the potential complications and no demonstration of survival benefits, CRRM could be safely omitted in patients with low-to-moderate breast cancer risk.

5 Conclusion

CRRM rates continue to rise all over the world although CRRM seems not to improve overall survival in women with unilateral sporadic breast cancer. The decision to pursue CRRM as part of treatment in women who have a low-to-moderate risk of developing a secondary cancer in the contralateral breast should consider both breast cancer individual-features and patients preferences, but should not be supported by the surgeon and avoided as first line approach with the exception of women highly worried about cancer. Prospective studies are needed to identify cohorts of patients most likely to benefit from CRRM.

  1. Conflict of interest statement: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60(5):277e300. 10.3322/caac.20073Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Cancer Research UK Cancer incidence - UK statistics. Available from: http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/incidence/; 2011Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al., eds. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2010. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/, based on November 2012 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2013, 2012Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Anders CK, Hsu DS, Broadwater G, et al. Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20): 3324-3330. 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.2471Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] ElSaghir NS, SeoudM, KhalilMK, etal. Effects of young age at presentation on survival in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:194. 10.1186/1471-2407-6-194Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Hartley MC, McKinley BP, Rogers EA, et al. Differential expression of prognostic factors and effect on survival in young (o or yi40) breast cancer patients: a case-control study. Am Surg. 2006;72(12):1189-1194 discussion 94-9510.1177/000313480607201208Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Partridge AH, GelberS, Peppercorn J, Sampson E, Knudsen K, Laufer M, etal. Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22(20):4174e83. 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.159Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Gluhoski VL, Siegel K, Gorey E. Unique stressors experienced by unmarried women with breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 1998;15(3e4):173e83. 10.1300/J077v15n03_08Suche in Google Scholar

[9] National Institutes of Health. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. June 18-211990. JAMA. 1991;265:391-39510.1001/jama.265.3.391Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Neuburger J, Macneill F, Jeevan R, et al. Trends in the use of bilateral mastectomy in England from 2002 to 2011: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e00317910.1136/bmjopen-2013-003179Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Dragun AE, Huang B, Tucker TC, et al. Increasing mastectomy rates among all age groups for early stage breast cancer: a 10-year study of surgical choice. Breast J. 2012;18:318-32510.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01245.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Maretoja TJ, Rasia S, Von Smitten KA, et al. Late results of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg 2007;94:1220-122510.1002/bjs.5815Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Michailidou K, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of more than 120,000 individuals identifies 15 new susceptibility loci for breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2015;47(4):373-38010.1038/ng.3242Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Michailidou K, Hall P, Gonzalez-Neira A, et al. Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2013;45(4):353-361, 361. e1-e210.1038/ng.2563Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Quan G, PommierSJ, Pommier RF. Incidence and outcomes of contralateral breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2008;195(5):645-650; discussion 65010.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Bedrosian I, Hu CY, Chang GJ. Population-based study of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and survival outcomes of breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:401-40910.1093/jnci/djq018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Stucky CC, Gray RJ, Wasif N, DueckAC, Pockaj BA. Increase in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: echoes of a bygone era? Surgical trends for unilateral breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17 Suppl 3:330-33710.1245/s10434-010-1259-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Yao K, Stewart AK, Winchester DJ, Winchester DP. Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2554-2562.10.1245/s10434-010-1091-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] McLaughlin CC, Lillquist PP, Edge SB, Surveillance of prophylactic mastectomy: trends in use from 1995 through 2005. Cancer. 2009;115:5404-541210.1002/cncr.24623Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Tuttle TM, JarosekS, Habermann EB, Arrington A, Abraham A, Morris TJ, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362-136710.1200/JCO.2008.20.1681Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, VirnigBA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203-520910.1200/JCO.2007.12.3141Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Hoover DJ, Paragi PR, Santoro E, Schafer S, Chamberlain RS. Prophylactic mastectomy in high risk patients: a practice-based review of the indications. Do we follow guidelines? Breast Dis. 2010;31:19-2710.3233/BD-2009-0291Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] DamleS, TealCB, LenertJJ, Marshall EC, Pan Q, McSwain AP. Mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates: an institutional review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1356-136310.1245/s10434-010-1434-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Yi M, Hunt KK, Arun BK, Bedrosian I, Barrera AG, Do KA, et al. Factors affecting the decision of breast cancer patients to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2010;3:1026-103410.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0130Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Sorbero ME, DickAW, Beckjord EB, Ahrendt G. Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1597-160510.1245/s10434-009-0362-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] King TA, Sakr R, PatilS, Gurevich I, Stempel M, Sampson M, et al. Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29: 2158-216410.1158/0008-5472.SABCS-09-38Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Quan G, Pommier SJ, Pommier RF. Incidence and outcomes of contralateral breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2008;195:645-50; discussion 65010.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.01.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] BougheyJC, HoskinTL, Degnim AC, Sellers TA, Johnson JL, Kasner MJ, et al. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy is associated with a survival advantage in high-risk women with a personal history of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2702-270910.1245/s10434-010-1136-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Chung A, Huynh K, Lawrence C, Sim MS, Giuliano A. Comparison of patient characteristics and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and unilateral total mastectomy in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(8):2600-260610.1245/s10434-012-2299-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Roberts A, Sandhu L, CilTD, Hofer SO, ZhongT. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rate stable at major Canadian breast cancer center. World J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 10;7(3):302-30710.5306/wjco.v7.i3.302Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Ager B, Butow P, Jansen J, Phillips KA, Porter D; CPM DA Advisory Group. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM): A systematic review of patient reported factors and psychological predictors influencing choice and satisfaction. Breast. 2016 Jun 8;28:107-12010.1016/j.breast.2016.04.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Roukos DH, Kappas AM, Tsianos E. Role of surgery in the prophylaxis of hereditary cancer syndromes. Annals of surgical oncology 2002;9(7):607-60910.1007/BF02574474Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] van Sprundel TC, Schmidt MK, Rookus MA, Brohet R, van Asperen CJ, Rutgers EJ, et al.Risk reduction of contralateral breast cancer and survival after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. British Journal of Cancer 2005;93(3):287-29210.1038/sj.bjc.6602703Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Lise M, Zavagno G, Meggiolaro F. Prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk of breast cancer. Forum 1997;7.1(2 Suppl):112-116Suche in Google Scholar

[35] Lostumbo L, Carbine NE, WallaceJ. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:(11):CD00274810.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Miller ME, Czechura T, Martz B, et a l. Operative risks associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: a single institution experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4113-412010.1245/s10434-013-3108-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Brummett CM. Chronic pain following breast surgery. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2011;15:124-13210.1053/j.trap.2011.07.001Suche in Google Scholar

[38] Altschuler A, Nekhlyudov L, Rolnick SJ, et al. Positive, negative, and disparate: women’s differing long-term psychosocial experiences of bilateral or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Breast J. 2008;14:25-3210.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00521.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-6-8
Accepted: 2016-6-18
Published Online: 2016-8-2
Published in Print: 2016-1-1

© 2016 Giuseppe Falco et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Article
  2. The possible molecular regulation mechanism of CIK cells inhibiting the proliferation of Human Lung Adenocarcinoma NCL-H157 Cells
  3. Case Report
  4. Urethral stone of unexpected size: case report and short literature review
  5. Case Report
  6. Complete remission through icotinib treatment in Non-small cell lung cancer epidermal growth factor receptor mutation patient with brain metastasis: A case report
  7. Research Article
  8. FPL tendon thickness, tremor and hand functions in Parkinson’s disease
  9. Research Article
  10. Diagnostic value of circulating tumor cells in cerebrospinal fluid
  11. Research Article
  12. A meta-analysis of neuroprotective effect for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the treatment of glaucoma
  13. Research Article
  14. MiR-218 increases sensitivity to cisplatin in esophageal cancer cells via targeting survivin expression
  15. Research Article
  16. Association of HOTAIR expression with PI3K/Akt pathway activation in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
  17. Research Article
  18. The role of interleukin genes in the course of depression
  19. Case Report
  20. A rare case of primary pulmonary diffuse large B cell lymphoma with CD5 positive expression
  21. Research Article
  22. DWI and SPARCC scoring assess curative effect of early ankylosing spondylitis
  23. Research Article
  24. The diagnostic value of serum CEA, NSE and MMP-9 for on-small cell lung cancer
  25. Case Report
  26. Dysphonia – the single symptom of rifampicin resistant laryngeal tuberculosis
  27. Review Article
  28. Development of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M. Mutation in non small-cell lung carcinoma
  29. Research Article
  30. Negative regulation of CDC42 expression and cell cycle progression by miR-29a in breast cancer
  31. Research Article
  32. Expression analysis of the TGF-β/SMAD target genes in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction
  33. Research Article
  34. Blood cells in thyroid cancer patients: a possible influence of apoptosis
  35. Research Article
  36. Detected EGFR mutation in cerebrospinal fluid of lung adenocarcinoma patients with meningeal metastasis
  37. Mini-review
  38. Pathogenesis-oriented approaches for the management of corticosteroid-resistant or relapsedprimary immune thrombocytopenia
  39. Research Article
  40. GSTP1 A>G polymorphism and chemosensitivity of osteosarcoma: A meta-analysis
  41. Research Article
  42. A meta-analysis of adiponectin gene rs22411766 T>G polymorphism and ischemic stroke susceptibility
  43. Research Article
  44. The diagnosis and pathological value of combined detection of HE4 and CA125 for patients with ovarian cancer
  45. Research Article
  46. SOX7 inhibits tumor progression of glioblastoma and is regulated by miRNA-24
  47. Research Article
  48. Sevoflurane affects evoked electromyography monitoring in cerebral palsy
  49. Case Report
  50. A case report of hereditary spherocytosis with concomitant chronic myelocytic leukemia
  51. Case Report
  52. A case of giant saphenous vein graft aneurysm followed serially after coronary artery bypass surgery
  53. Research Article
  54. LncRNA TUG1 is upregulated and promotes cell proliferation in osteosarcoma
  55. Review Article
  56. Meningioma recurrence
  57. Case Report
  58. Endobronchial amyloidosis mimicking bronchial asthma: a case report and review of the literature
  59. Case Report
  60. A confusing case report of pulmonary langerhans cell histiocytosis and literature review
  61. Research Article
  62. Effect of hesperetin on chaperone activity in selenite-induced cataract
  63. Research Article
  64. Clinical value of self-assessment risk of osteoporosis in Chinese
  65. Research Article
  66. Correlation analysis of VHL and Jade-1 gene expression in human renal cell carcinoma
  67. Research Article
  68. Is acute appendicitis still misdiagnosed?
  69. Retraction
  70. Retraction of: application of food-specific IgG antibody detection in allergy dermatosis
  71. Review Article
  72. Platelet Rich Plasma: a short overview of certain bioactive components
  73. Research Article
  74. Correlation between CTLA-4 gene rs221775A>G single nucleotide polymorphism and multiple sclerosis susceptibility. A meta-analysis
  75. Review Article
  76. Standards of anesthesiology practice during neuroradiological interventions
  77. Research Article
  78. Expression and clinical significance of LXRα and SREBP-1c in placentas of preeclampsia
  79. Letter to the Editor
  80. ARDS diagnosed by SpO2/FiO2 ratio compared with PaO2/FiO2 ratio: the role as a diagnostic tool for early enrolment into clinical trials
  81. Research Article
  82. Impact of sensory integration training on balance among stroke patients: sensory integration training on balance among stroke patients
  83. Review Article
  84. MicroRNAs as regulatory elements in psoriasis
  85. Review Article
  86. Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and postpandemic influenza in Lithuania
  87. Review Article
  88. Garengeot’s hernia: two case reports with CT diagnosis and literature review
  89. Research Article
  90. Concept of experimental preparation for treating dentin hypersensitivity
  91. Research Article
  92. Hydrogen water reduces NSE, IL-6, and TNF-α levels in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
  93. Research Article
  94. Xanthogranuloma of the sellar region diagnosed by frozen section
  95. Case Report
  96. Laparoscopic antegrade cholecystectomy: a standard procedure?
  97. Case Report
  98. Maxillary fibrous dysplasia associated with McCune-Albright syndrome. A case study
  99. Regular Article
  100. Sialoendoscopy, sialography, and ultrasound: a comparison of diagnostic methods
  101. Research Article
  102. Antibody Response to Live Attenuated Vaccines in Adults in Japan
  103. Conference article
  104. Excellence and safety in surgery require excellent and safe tutoring
  105. Conference article
  106. Suggestions on how to make suboptimal kidney transplantation an ethically viable option
  107. Regular Article
  108. Ectopic pregnancy treatment by combination therapy
  109. Conference article
  110. Use of a simplified consent form to facilitate patient understanding of informed consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  111. Regular Article
  112. Cusum analysis for learning curve of videothoracoscopic lobectomy
  113. Regular Article
  114. A meta-analysis of association between glutathione S-transferase M1 gene polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease susceptibility
  115. Conference article
  116. Plastination: ethical and medico-legal considerations
  117. Regular Article
  118. Investigation and control of a suspected nosocomial outbreak of pan-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in an intensive care unit
  119. Regular Article
  120. Multifactorial analysis of fatigue scale among nurses in Poland
  121. Regular Article
  122. Smoking cessation for free: outcomes of a study of three Romanian clinics
  123. Regular Article
  124. Clinical efficacy and safety of tripterygium glycosides in treatment of stage IV diabetic nephropathy: A meta-analysis
  125. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  126. Prevention and treatment of peritoneal adhesions in patients affected by vascular diseases following surgery: a review of the literature
  127. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  128. Surgical treatment of recidivist lymphedema
  129. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  130. CT and MR imaging of the thoracic aorta
  131. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  132. Role of FDG-PET scan in staging of pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma
  133. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  134. Sternal reconstruction by extracellular matrix: a rare case of phaces syndrome
  135. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  136. Prenatal diagnosis, 3-D virtual rendering and lung sparing surgery by ligasure device in a baby with “CCAM and intralobar pulmonary sequestration”
  137. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  138. Serum levels of inhibin B in adolescents after varicocelelectomy: A long term follow up
  139. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  140. Our experience in the treatment of Malignant Fibrous Hystiocytoma of the larynx: clinical diagnosis, therapeutic approach and review of literature
  141. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  142. Delayed recurrent nerve paralysis following post-traumatic aortic pseudoaneurysm
  143. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  144. Integrated therapeutic approach to giant solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura: report of a case and review of the literature
  145. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  146. Celiac axis compression syndrome: laparoscopic approach in a strange case of chronic abdominal pain in 71 years old man
  147. Special Issue on Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies
  148. A rare case of persistent hypoglossal artery associated with contralateral proximal subclavian stenosis
  149. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  150. Contralateral risk reducing mastectomy in Non-BRCA-Mutated patients
  151. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  152. Professional dental and oral surgery liability in Italy: a comparative analysis of the insurance products offered to health workers
  153. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  154. Informed consent in robotic surgery: quality of information and patient perception
  155. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  156. Malfunctions of robotic system in surgery: role and responsibility of surgeon in legal point of view
  157. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  158. Medicolegal implications of surgical errors and complications in neck surgery: A review based on the Italian current legislation
  159. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  160. Iatrogenic splenic injury: review of the literature and medico-legal issues
  161. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  162. Donation of the body for scientific purposes in Italy: ethical and medico-legal considerations
  163. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  164. Cosmetic surgery: medicolegal considerations
  165. Focus on Medico-Legal and Ethical Topics in Surgery in Italy
  166. Voluntary termination of pregnancy (medical or surgical abortion): forensic medicine issues
  167. Review Article
  168. Role of Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Elderly Immune Thrombocytopenia
  169. Review Article
  170. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive system
  171. Review Article
  172. Efficacy and safety of splenectomy in adult autoimmune hemolytic anemia
  173. Research Article
  174. Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and Ph nose and salivary: proposal of a simple method outpatient in patients adults
  175. Case Report
  176. Idiopathic pleural panniculitis with recurrent pleural effusion not associated with Weber-Christian disease
  177. Research Article
  178. Morbid Obesity: treatment with Bioenterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB), psychological and nursing care: our experience
  179. Research Article
  180. Learning curve for endorectal ultrasound in young and elderly: lights and shades
  181. Case Report
  182. Uncommon primary hydatid cyst occupying the adrenal gland space, treated with laparoscopic surgical approach in an old patient
  183. Research Article
  184. Distraction techniques for face and smile aesthetic preventing ageing decay
  185. Research Article
  186. Preoperative high-intensity training in frail old patients undergoing pulmonary resection for NSCLC
  187. Review Article
  188. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis in the elderly patients
  189. Research Article
  190. Prophylactic GSV surgery in elderly candidates for hip or knee arthroplasty
  191. Research Article
  192. Diagnostic yield and safety of C-TBNA in elderly patients with lung cancer
  193. Research Article
  194. The learning curve of laparoscopic holecystectomy in general surgery resident training: old age of the patient may be a risk factor?
  195. Research Article
  196. Self-gripping mesh versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective clinical trial in young and elderly patients
  197. Research Article
  198. Anal sphincter dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: an observation manometric study
Heruntergeladen am 18.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2016-0047/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen