Home On more general forms of proportional fractional operators
Article Open Access

On more general forms of proportional fractional operators

  • Fahd Jarad , Manar A. Alqudah and Thabet Abdeljawad EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 26, 2020

Abstract

In this article, more general types of fractional proportional integrals and derivatives are proposed. Some properties of these operators are discussed.

MSC 2010: 26A33; 45P05

1 Introduction

The fractional calculus, which is engaged in integral and differential operators of arbitrary orders, is as old as the conceptional calculus that deals with integrals and derivatives of non-negative integer orders. Since not all of the real phenomena can be modeled using the operators in the traditional calculus, researchers searched for generalizations of these operators. It turned out that the fractional operators are excellent tools to use in modeling long-memory processes and many phenomena that appear in physics, chemistry, electricity, mechanics and many other disciplines. Here, we invite the readers to read [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] and the reference cited in these books. However, targeting the best understanding more accurate modeling real world problems, researchers were in need of other types of fractional operators that were confined to Riemann-Liouville fractional operators. In the literature, one can find many works that propose new fractional operators. We mention [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. Nonetheless, the fractional integrals and derivatives which were proposed in these works were just particular cases of what so called fractional integrals/derivatives withe dependence on a kernel function [2, 5, 17]. There are other types of fractional operators which were suggested in the literature.

On the other hand, due to the singularities found in the traditional fractional operators which are thought to make some difficulties in the modeling process, some researches recently proposed new types of non-singular fractional operators. Some of these operators contain exponential kernels and some of them involve the Mittag-Leffler functions. For such types of fractional operators we refer to [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27].

All the fractional operators considered in the references in the first and the second paragraphs are non-local. However, there are many local operators found in the literature that allow differentiation to a non-integer order and these are called local fractional operators. In [28], the authors presented what they called conformable (fractional) derivative. The author in [29] proposed other basic concepts related to the conformable derivatives. We would like to mention that the fractional operators proposed in [12, 13] are the non-local fractional version of the local operators suggested in [28]. In addition, the non-local fractional version of the ones in [29] can be seen in [16].

It is customary that any derivative of order 0 when performed to a function should give the function itself. This essential property is dispossessed by the conformable derivatives. Notwithstanding, in [30, 31], for skae of overcoming this obstacle, the authors proposed a new definition of the conformal derivative that gives the function itself when the order of the local derivative approaches 0. In addition to this, the non-local fractional operators that emerge from iterating the above-mentioned derivative were held forth in [32].

In this article, we extend the work done in [32] to introduce a new fractional operators relying on the proportional derivatives of a function with respect to another function which can be defined in parallel with the definitions discussed in [30]. The kernel obtained in the fractional operators which will be proposed contains an exponential function and is function dependent. The semi--group properties will be discussed.

The article is organized as follows: Section 2 presents some essential definitions for fractional derivatives and integrals. In Section 3 we present the general forms of the fractional proportional integrals and derivatives. In section 4, we present the general form of Caputo fractional proportional derivatives. In the end, we conclude our results.

2 Preliminaries

In this section, we present some principal definitions of fractional operators. We first present the traditional fractional operators and then the fractional proportional operators.

2.1 The conventional fractional operators and their general forms

For ω ∈ ℂ, Re(ω) ≥ 0, the forward (left) ωth order Riemann–Liouville fractional integral is defined by

(aIωf)(x)=1Γ(ω)ax(xu)ω1f(u)du. (2.1)

The backward (right) ωth Riemann–Liouville fractional integral reads

(Ibωf)(x)=1Γ(ω)xb(ux)ω1f(u)du. (2.2)

The forward ωth order Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative, whre Re(ω) ≥ 0 is given as

(aDωf)(x)=(ddx)n(aInωf)(x),n=[ω]+1. (2.3)

The backward ωth order Riemann–Liouville fractional derivative, where Re(ω) ≥ 0 reads

(Dbωf)(t)=(ddt)n(Ibnωf)(t). (2.4)

The forward Caputo fractional derivative has the following form

(aCDωf)(x)=(aInωf(n))(x),n=[ω]+1. (2.5)

The backward Caputo fractional derivative reads

(CDbωf)(x)=(Ibnω(1)nf(n))(x). (2.6)

The generalized forward and backward fractional integrals Katugampola setings [12] are given respectively as

(aIω,σf)(x)=1Γ(ω)ax(xσuσσ)ω1f(u)duu1σ (2.7)

and

(Ibω,σf)(x)=1Γ(ω)tb(uσxσσ)ω1f(u)duu1σ. (2.8)

The generalized forward and backward fractional derivatives in the sense of Katugampola [13] are defined respectively as

(aDω,σf)(x)=γn(aInω,σf)(t)=γnΓ(nω)ax(xσuσσ)nω1f(u)duu1σ (2.9)

and

(Dbω,σf)(x)=(γ)n(Ibnω,σf)(x)=(γ)nΓ(nω)xb(uσxσσ)nω1f(u)duu1σ, (2.10)

where σ ≥ 0 and γ=x1σddx. The Caputo modification of the forward and backward generalized fractional derivatives are proposed in [14] in the following forms respectively

(aCDω,σf)(x)=(aInω,σγnf)(x)=1Γ(nω)ax(xσuσσ)nω1γnf(u)duu1σ, (2.11)

and

(CDbω,σf)(x)=(aInω,σ(γ)nf)(x)=1Γ(nω)xb(uσxσσ)nω1(γ)nf(u)duu1σ. (2.12)

For ω ∈ ℂ, Re(ω) ≥ 0 the forward Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order ω of a function f with respect to a continuously differentiable and increasing function ν has the following form [2, 5]

aIω,νf(x)=1Γ(ω)ax(ν(x)ν(u))ω1f(u)ν(u)du. (2.13)

For ω ∈ ℂ, Re(ω) ≥ 0 the backward Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order ω of f with respect to a continuously differentiable and increasing function ν has the following form [2, 5]

Ibω,νf(x)=1Γ(ω)xb(ν(u)ν(x))ω1f(u)ν(u)du. (2.14)

For ω ∈ ℂ, Re(ω) ≥ 0, the generalized forward and backward Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives of order ω of f with respect to a continuously differentiable and increasing function ν have respectively the forms [2, 6]

aDω,νf(x)=(1ν(x)ddx)n(aInω,νf)(x)=(1ν(x)ddx)nΓ(nω)ax(ν(x)ν(u))nω1f(u)ν(u)du (2.15)

and

Dbω,νf(x)=(1ν(x)ddx)n(Ibnω,νf)(x)=(1ν(x)ddx)nΓ(nω)ax(ν(x)ν(u))nω1f(u)ν(u)du, (2.16)

where n = [ω] + 1. It is easy to observe that if we choose ν(x) = x, the integrals in (2.13) and (2.14) becomes the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals respectively and (2.15) and (2.16) becomes the left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives. When ν(x) = ln x, the Hadamard fractional operators are obtained [2, 5]. While if one considers ν(x)=xσσ, the fractional operators in the settings of Katugampola [12, 13] are derived.

In forward and backward generalized Caputo derivatives of a function with respect to another function are presented respectively as [17]

aCDω,νf(x)=(aInω,νf[n])(x) (2.17)

and

CDbω,νf(x)=(aInω,ν(1)nf[n])(x), (2.18)

where f[n](x)=(1ν(x)ddx)nf(x).

2.2 The proportional derivatives and their fractional integrals and derivatives

In [28], the authors introduced The conformable derivative. More properties and a modified type of this derivative were explored in [29]. [30], Anderson et al. proposed a modified conformable derivative by utilizing proportional derivatives. In fact, they proposed the following definition.

Definition 2.1

(Modified conformable derivatives) For σ ∈ [0, 1], let the functions μ0, μ1 : [0, 1] × ℝ → [0, ∞) be continuous such that for all t ∈ ℝ we have

limσ0+μ1(σ,t)=1,limσ0+μ0(σ,t)=0,limσ1μ1(σ,t)=0,limσ1μ0(σ,t)=1,

and μ1(σ, t) ≠ 0, σ ∈ [0, 1), μ0(σ, t) ≠ 0, σ ∈ (0, 1]. Then, the modified conformable differential operator of order σ is defined by

Dσf(t)=μ1(σ,t)f(t)+μ0(σ,t)f(t). (2.19)

For details about such derivatives we refer to [30, 31].

As a special case, we shall consider the simplest case and restrict our work to the case when μ1(σ, t) = 1−σ and μ0(σ, t) = σ. Therefore, (2.19) becomes

Dσf(t)=(1σ)f(t)+σf(t). (2.20)

Notice that limσ→0+ Dσ f(t) = f(t) and limσ→1 Dσ f(t) = f′(t). It is obvious that the derivative (2.20) is generalizes the conformable derivative which does not yieldo the original function as σ approaches to 0. The associated fractional proportional integrals are defined as follows.

Definition 2.2

[32] For σ ≥ 0 and ω ∈ ℂ, Re(ω) ≥ 0, the forward fractional proportional integral of f reads

(aIω,σf)(x)=1σωΓ(ω)axeσ1σ(xξ)(xξ)ω1f(ξ)dξ (2.21)

and the backward one reads

(Ibω,σf)(x)=1σωΓ(ω)xbeσ1σ(ξx)(ξx)ω1f(ξ)dξ. (2.22)

Definition 2.3

[32] For σ ≥ 0 and ω ∈ ℂ, Re(ω) ≥ 0, the forward fractional proportional derivative is defined as

(aDω,σf)(x)=Dn,σaInω,σf(x)=Dxn,σσnωΓ(nω)axeσ1σ(xξ)(xξ)nω1f(ξ)dξ. (2.23)

The backward proportional fractional derivative is defined by [32]

(Dbω,σf)(x)=Dn,σIbnω,σf(x)=Dn,σσnωΓ(nω)xbeσ1σ(ξx)(ξx)nω1f(ξ)dξ, (2.24)

where n = [Re(ω)] + 1 and (Dσ f)(t) = (1 − σ)f(t) − σ f′(t).

Lastly, the left and right fractional proportional derivatives in the Caputo settings respectively read [32]

(aCDω,σf)(x)=(aInω,σDn,σf)(x)=1σnωΓ(nω)axeσ1σ(xξ)(xξ)nω1(Dn,σf)(ξ)dξ (2.25)

and

(CDbω,σf)(x)=(Ibnω,σDn,σf)(x)=1σnωΓ(nω)xbeσ1σ(ξx)(ξx)nω1(Dn,σf)(ξ)dξ. (2.26)

3 The fractional proportional derivative of a function with respect to another function

Definition 3.1

(The proportional derivative of a function with respect to anothor function) For σ ∈ [0, 1], let the functions μ0, μ1 : [0, 1] × ℝ → [0, ∞) be continuous such that for all t ∈ ℝ we have

limσ0+μ1(σ,t)=1,limσ0+μ0(σ,t)=0,limσ1μ1(σ,t)=0,limσ1μ0(σ,t)=1,

and μ1(σ, t) ≠ 0, σ ∈ [0, 1), μ0(σ, t) ≠ 0, σ ∈ (0, 1]. Let also ν(t) be a strictly increasing continuous function. Then, the proportional differential operator of order σ of f with respect to g is defined by

Dσ,νf(t)=μ1(σ,t)f(t)+μ0(σ,t)f(t)ν(t). (3.1)

We shall restrict ourselves to the case when μ1(σ, t) = 1 − σ and μ0(σ, t) = σ. Therefore, (3.1) becomes

Dσ,νf(t)=(1σ)f(t)+σf(t)ν(t). (3.2)

The corresponding integral of (3.2)

aI1,σ,νf(t)=1σateσ1σ(ν(t)ν(s))f(s)ν(s)ds, (3.3)

where we accept that aI0,σ f(t) = f(t).

To generalize a more general class of fractional integral based on the proportional derivative, we use induction and changing the order of integrals to show that

(aIn,σ,νf)(t)=1σateσ1σ(ν(t)ν(ξ1))ν(ξ1)dξ11σaξ1eσ1σ(ν(ξ1)ν(ξ2))ν(ξ2)dξ21σaξn1eσ1σ(ν(ξn1)ν(ξn))f(ξn)ν(ξn)dξn=1σnΓ(n)ateσ1σ(ν(t)ν(ξ))(ν(t)ν(ξ))n1f(ξ)ν(ξ)dξ. (3.4)

Based on (3.4), we can present the following general proportional fractional integral.

Definition 3.2

For σ ∈ (0, 1], ω ∈ ℂ, Re(ω) ≥ 0, we define the left fractional integral of f with respect to g by

(aIω,σ,νf)(t)=1σωΓ(ω)ateσ1σ(ν(t)ν(ξ))(ν(t)ν(ξ))ω1f(ξ)ν(ξ)dξ. (3.5)

The right fractional proportional integral ending at b can be defined by

(Ibω,σ,νf)(t)=1σωΓ(ω)tbeσ1σ(ν(ξ)ν(t))(ν(ξ)ν(t))ω1f(ξ)ν(ξ)dξ. (3.6)

Remark 3.1

To deal with the right proportional fractional case we shall use the notation

(Dσ,νf)(t):=(1σ)f(t)σf(t)ν(t). (3.7)

We shall also write

(Dn,σ,νf)(t)=(Dσ,νDσ,νDσ,νntimesf)(t). (3.8)

Remark 3.2

The integrals in (3.5) and (3.6) coincide with the integrals (2) and (3) in [33] and the integrals in (6) and (7) in [34]. If one sets ν(t) = ln t (3.5) and (3.6) coincide with the integrals (2.5) and (2.6) in [35].

Definition 3.3

For σ ≥ 0, ω ∈ ℂ, Re(ω) ≥ 0 and νC[a, b], where ν′(t) ≥ 0, we define the general left fractional derivative of f with respect to ν as

(aDω,σ,νf)(t)=Dn,σ,νaInω,σ,νf(t)=Dtn,σ,νσnωΓ(nω)ateσ1σ(ν(t)ν(ξ))(ν(t)ν(ξ))nω1f(ξ)ν(ξ)dξ (3.9)

and the general right fractional derivative of f with respect to g as

(Dbω,σ,νf)(t)=Dn,σ,νIbnω,σ,νf(t)=Dtn,σ,νσnωΓ(nω)tbeσ1σ(ν(ξ)ν(t))(ν(ξ)ν(t))nω1f(ξ)ν(ξ)dξ, (3.10)

where n = [Re(ω)] + 1.

Remark 3.3

Clearly, if we let σ = 1 in Definition 3.2 and Definition 3.3, we obtain

  1. the Riemann-Liouville fractional operators (2.1), (2.2),(2.3) and (2.4) if ν(t) = t;

  2. the fractional operators in the Katugampola setting(2.7), (2.8), (2.9) and (2.10) if ν(t)=tμμ;

  3. the Hadamard fractional operators if ν(t) = ln t [2, 5];

  4. the fractional operators mentioned in [16] if ν(t)=(ta)μμ.

Proposition 3.1

Let ω, η ∈ ℂ be such that Re(ω) ≥ 0 and Re(η) ≥ 0. Then, for any σ ≥ 0 we have

  1. (aIω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(x)ν(a))η1)(t)=Γ(η)Γ(η+ω)σωeσ1σν(t)(ν(t)ν(a))ω+η1, Re(ω) ≥ 0;

  2. (Ibω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(b)ν(x))η1)(t)=Γ(η)Γ(η+ω)σωeσ1σν(t)(ν(b)ν(t))ω+η1, Re(ω) ≥ 0;

  3. (aDω,σeσ1σν(x)(ν(x)ν(a))η1)(t)=σωΓ(η)Γ(ηω)eσ1σν(t)(ν(t)ν(a))η1ω, Re(ω) ≥ 0;

  4. (Dbω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(b)ν(x))η1)(t)=σωΓ(η)Γ(ηω)eσ1σν(t)(ν(b)Gν(t))η1ω, Re(ω) ≥ 0.

Proof

The proofs of relations (a) and (b) are very easy to handle. We will prove (c) while the proof of (d) is analogous.

By the definition of the left proportional fractional derivative and relation (a), we have

(aDω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(x)ν(a))η1)(t)=Dn,σ,ν(aInω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(x)ν(a))η1)(t)=Dn,σ,νΓ(η)Γ(η+nω)σnωeσ1σν(t)(ν(t)ν(a))nω+η1=σnΓ(η)(nω+η1)(nω+η1)(ηω)σnωΓ(nω+η)×eσ1σν(t)(ν(t)ν(a))η1ω=σωΓ(η)Γ(ηω)eσ1σν(t)(ν(t)ν(a))η1ω.

Here, we have used the fact that Dσ,ν(h(t)eσ1σν(t))=σh(t)g(t)eσ1σν(t).

Below we present the semi-group property for the general fractional proportional integrals of a function with respect to another function.

Theorem 3.1

[33] Let σ ∈ (0, 1], Re(ω) ≥ 0 and Re(η) ≥ 0. Then, if f is continuous and defined for ta or tb, we have

aIω,σ,ν(aIη,σ,νf)(t)=aIη,σ,ν(aIω,σf)(t)=(aIω+η,σ,νf)(t) (3.11)

and

Ibω,σ,ν(Ibη,σ,νf)(t)=Ibη,σ,ν(Ibω,σf)(t)=(Ibω+η,σ,νf)(t). (3.12)

Theorem 3.2

Let 0 ≤ m ≤ [Re(ω)] + 1. Then, we have

Dm,σ,ν(aIω,σ,νf)(t)=(aIωm,σ,νf)(t) (3.13)

and

Dm,σ,ν(Ibω,σ,νf)(t)=(Ibωm,σ,νf)(t) (3.14)

Proof

Here we prove (3.13), while one can prove (3.14) likewise. Using the fact that Dtσ,νeσ1σ(ν(t)ν(ξ))=0), we have

Dm,σ,ν(aIω,σ,νf)(t)Dm1,σ,ν(Dσ,νaIω,σ,νf)(t)=Dm1,σ,ν1σω1Γ(ω1)ateσ1σ(ν(t)ν(ξ))(ν(t)ν(ξ))ω2f(ξ)ν(ξ)dξ.

Proceeding m−times in the same manner we obtain (3.13).□

Corollary 3.1

Let 0 ≤ Re(η) ≤ Re(ω) and m − 1 ≤ Re(η) ≤ m. Then, we have

aDη,σ,νaIω,σ,νf(t)=aIωη,σ,νf(t) (3.15)

and

Dbη,σ,νIbω,σ,νf(t)=Ibωη,σ,νf(t). (3.16)

Proof

By the help of Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2, we have

aDη,σ,νaIω,σ,νf(t)=Dam,σ,νIamη,σ,νIω,σ,νf(t)=Dm,σ,νaImη+ω,σ,νf(t)=aIωη,σ,νf(t).

This was the proof of (3.15). One can prove (3.16) in a similar way.□

Theorem 3.3

Let f be integrable on ta or tb and Re[ω] ≥ 0, σ ∈ (0, 1], n = [Re(ω)] + 1. Then, we have

aDω,σ,νaIω,σ,νf(t)=f(t) (3.17)

and

Dbω,σ,νIbω,σ,νf(t)=f(t). (3.18)

Proof

By the definition and Theorem 3.1, we have

aDω,σ,νaIω,σ,νf(t)=Dn,σ,νaInω,σ,νaIω,σ,νf(t)=Dn,σ,νaIn,σ,νf(t)=f(t).

4 The Caputo fractional proportional derivative of a function with respect to another function

Definition 4.1

For σ ∈ (0, 1] and ω ∈ ℂ with Re(ω) ≥ 0 we define the left derivative of Caputo type as

(aCDω,σ,νf)(t)=aInω,σ,ν(Dn,σ,νf)(t)=1σnωΓ(nω)ateσ1σ(ν(t)ν(s))(ν(t)ν(s))nω1(Dn,σ,νf)(s)ν(s)ds. (4.1)

Similarly, the right derivative of Caputo type ending is defined by

(CDbω,σf)(t)=Ibnω,σ,ν(Dn,σ,νf)(t)=1σnωΓ(nω)tbeσ1σ(ν(s)ν(t))(ν(s)ν(t))nω1(Dn,σ,νf)(s)ν(s)ds, (4.2)

where n = [Re(ω)] + 1.

Proposition 4.1

Let ω, η ∈ ℂ be such that Re(ω) ≥ 0 and Re(η) ≥ 0. Then, for any σ ∈ (0, 1] and n = [Re(ω)] + 1 we have

  1. (aCDω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(x)ν(a))η1)(t)=σωΓ(η)Γ(ηω)eσ1σν(t)(ν(t)ν(a))η1ω, Re(η) ≥ n;

  2. (CDbω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(b)ν(x))η1)(t)=σωΓ(η)Γ(ηω)eσ1σν(t)(ν(b)ν(t))η1ω, Re(η) ≥ n.

For k = 0, 1, …, n − 1, we have

(aCDω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(x)ν(a)k)(t)=0and(CDbω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(b)ν(x))k)(t)=0.

In particular, (aCDω,σeσ1σν(x)(t)=0and(CDbω,σeσ1σν(x))(t)=0.

Proof

We only prove the first relation. The proof of the second relation is similar. We have

(aCDω,σ,νeσ1σν(x)(ν(x)ν(a))η1)(t)=aInω,σ,νDn,σ,νeσ1σν(t)(ν(t)ν(a))η1=aInω,σ,νσn(η1)(η2)(η1n)(ν(t)ν(a))ηn1eσ1σν(t)=σn(η1)(η2)(η1n)Γ(ηn)Γ(ηω)σnω(ν(t)ν(a))ηω1eσ1σν(t)=σωΓ(η)Γ(ηω)eσ1σν(t)(ν(t)ν(a))η1ω.

5 Conclusions

We have used the proportional derivatives of a function with respect to another function to obtain left and right generalized type fractional integrals and derivatives involving two parameters ω and σ and depending on a kernel function. The Riemann-Liouville and Caputo fractional derivatives in the classical fractional calculus can obtained as σ tends to 1 and by choosing ν(t) = t. The integrals have the semi-group property and together with their corresponding derivatives have exponential functions as part of their kernels. It should be noted that other properties of these new operators can be obtained by using the Laplace transform proposed in [17]. Moreover, for a specific choice of ν, the proportional fractional operators in the settings of Hadamard and Katugampola can be obtained.

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program.

References

[1] I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, San Diego CA, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

[2] S.G. Samko, A.A. Kilbas, and O.I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, 1993.Search in Google Scholar

[3] R. Hilfer, Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics, Word Scientific, Singapore, 2000.10.1142/3779Search in Google Scholar

[4] L. Debnath, Recent applications of fractional calculus to science and engineering, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2003 (2003), no. 54, 3413–3442.10.1155/S0161171203301486Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Kilbas, H.M. Srivastava, and J.J. Trujillo, Theory and Application of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[6] R.L. Magin, Fractional Calculus in Bioengineering, Begell House Publishers, Redding, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Aman, Q. Al-Mdallal, and I. Khan, Heat transfer and second order slip effect on MHD flow of fractional Maxwell fluid in a porous medium, J. King Saud U. Sci. 32 (2020), no. 1, 450–458.10.1016/j.jksus.2018.07.007Search in Google Scholar

[8] Q.M. Al-Mdallal and A.S.A. Omer, Fractional-order Legendre-collocation method for solving fractional initial value problems, Appl. Math. Comput. 321 (2018), 74–84.10.1016/j.amc.2017.10.012Search in Google Scholar

[9] Q.M. Al-Mdallal, On fractional-Legendre spectral Galerkin method for fractional Sturm-Liouville problems, Chaos Soliton Fract. 116 (2018), 261–267.10.1016/j.chaos.2018.09.032Search in Google Scholar

[10] F.A. Rihan, Q.M. Al-Mdallal, H.J. Alsakaji, and A. Hashish, A fractional-order epidemic model with time-delay and nonlinear incidence rate, Chaos Soliton Fract. 126 (2019), 97–105.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.05.039Search in Google Scholar

[11] A.A. Kilbas, Hadamard-type fractional calculus, J. Korean Math. Soc. 38 (2001), no. 6, 1191–1204.Search in Google Scholar

[12] U.N. Katugampola, New approach to generalized fractional integral, Appl. Math. Comput. 218 (2011), no. 3, 860–865.10.1016/j.amc.2011.03.062Search in Google Scholar

[13] U.N. Katugampola, A new approach to generalized fractional derivatives, Bul. Math. Anal. Appl. 6 (2014), no. 4, 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

[14] F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, and D. Baleanu, On the generalized fractional derivatives and their Caputo modification, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10 (2017), no. 5, 2607–2619.10.22436/jnsa.010.05.27Search in Google Scholar

[15] F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, and D. Baleanu, Caputo-type modification of the Hadamard fractional derivative, Adv. Difference Equ. 2012 (2012), 2012:142.10.1186/1687-1847-2012-142Search in Google Scholar

[16] F. Jarad, E. Uğurlu, T. Abdeljawad, and D. Baleanu, On a new class of fractional operators, Adv. Difference Equ. 2018 (2018), 2018:142.10.1186/s13662-017-1306-zSearch in Google Scholar

[17] F. Jarad and T. Abdeljawad, Generalized fractional derivatives and Laplace transform, Discret. Contin. Dyn. S. 13 (2020), no. 3, 709–722.10.3934/dcdss.2020039Search in Google Scholar

[18] M. Caputo and M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1 (2015), 73–85.Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. Losada and J. J. Nieto, Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1 (2015), 87–92.Search in Google Scholar

[20] T. Abdeljawad and D. Baleanu, On fractional derivatives with exponential kernel and their discrete versions, Rep. Math. Phys. 80 (2017), no. 1, 11–27.10.1016/S0034-4877(17)30059-9Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Atangana and D. Baleanu, New fractional derivative with non-local and non-singular kernel, Thermal Sci. 20 (2016), 757–763.10.2298/TSCI160111018ASearch in Google Scholar

[22] T. Abdeljawad and D. Baleanu, Integration by parts and its applications of a new nonlocal fractional derivative with Mittag-Leffler nonsingular kernel, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10 (2017), no. 3, 1098–1107.10.22436/jnsa.010.03.20Search in Google Scholar

[23] H. Khan, A. Khan, F. Jarad, and A. Shah, Existence and data dependence theorems for solutions of an ABC-fractional order impulsive system, Chaos Soliton Fract. 131 (2020), 109477.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.109477Search in Google Scholar

[24] H. Khan, F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, and A. Khan, A singular ABC-fractional differential equation with p-Laplacian operator, Chaos Soliton Fract. 129 (2019), 56–61.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.08.017Search in Google Scholar

[25] A. Khan, J.F. Gomez-Aguilar, T.S. Khan, and H. Khan, Stability analysis and numerical solutions of fractional order HIV/AIDS model, Chaos Soliton Fract. 122 (2019), 119–128.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.022Search in Google Scholar

[26] A. Khan, H. Khan, J.F. Gomez-Aguilar, and T. Abdeljawad, Existence and Hyers-Ulam stability for a nonlinear singular fractional differential equations with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Chaos Soliton Fract. 127 (2019), 422–427.10.1016/j.chaos.2019.07.026Search in Google Scholar

[27] H. Khan, Y. Li, A. Khan, and Az. Khan, Existence of solution for a fractional-order Lotka-Volterra reaction-diffusion model with Mittag-Leffler kernel, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 42 (2019), 3377–3387.10.1002/mma.5590Search in Google Scholar

[28] R. Khalil, M. Al Horani, A. Yousef, and M. Sababheh, A new definition of fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 264 (2014), 65–70.10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar

[29] T. Abdeljawad, On conformable fractional calculus, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 279 (2013), 57–66.10.1016/j.cam.2014.10.016Search in Google Scholar

[30] D.R. Anderson and D.J. Ulness, Newly defined conformable derivatives, Adv. Dyn. Sys. App. 10 (2015), no. 2, 109–137.Search in Google Scholar

[31] D.R. Anderson, Second-order self-adjoint differential equations using a proportional-derivative controller, Comm. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 24 (2017), 17–48.Search in Google Scholar

[32] F. Jarad, T. Abdeljawad, and J. Alzabut, Generalized fractional derivatives generated by a class of local proportional derivatives, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 226 (2017), 3457–3471.10.1140/epjst/e2018-00021-7Search in Google Scholar

[33] S. Rashid, F. Jarad, M.A. Noor, and H. Kalsoom, Inequalities by means of generalized proportional fractional integral operators with respect to another function, Mathematics 7 (2019), no. 12, 10.3390/math7121225.Search in Google Scholar

[34] G. Rahman, T. Abdeljawad, F. Jarad, A. Khan, and K.S. Nisar, Bounds of generalized proportional fractional integrals in general form via convex functions and their applications, Mathematics 8 (2020), no. 1, 10.3390/math8010113.Search in Google Scholar

[35] G. Rahman, T. Abdeljawad, F. Jarad, A. Khan, and K.S. Nisar, Certain inequalities via generalized proportional Hadamard fractional integral operators, Adv. Difference Equ. 2019 (2019), 454.10.1186/s13662-019-2381-0Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-07
Accepted: 2020-02-12
Published Online: 2020-03-26

© 2020 Fahd Jarad et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Non-occurrence of the Lavrentiev phenomenon for a class of convex nonautonomous Lagrangians
  3. Strong and weak convergence of Ishikawa iterations for best proximity pairs
  4. Curve and surface construction based on the generalized toric-Bernstein basis functions
  5. The non-negative spectrum of a digraph
  6. Bounds on F-index of tricyclic graphs with fixed pendant vertices
  7. Crank-Nicolson orthogonal spline collocation method combined with WSGI difference scheme for the two-dimensional time-fractional diffusion-wave equation
  8. Hardy’s inequalities and integral operators on Herz-Morrey spaces
  9. The 2-pebbling property of squares of paths and Graham’s conjecture
  10. Existence conditions for periodic solutions of second-order neutral delay differential equations with piecewise constant arguments
  11. Orthogonal polynomials for exponential weights x2α(1 – x2)2ρe–2Q(x) on [0, 1)
  12. Rough sets based on fuzzy ideals in distributive lattices
  13. On more general forms of proportional fractional operators
  14. The hyperbolic polygons of type (ϵ, n) and Möbius transformations
  15. Tripled best proximity point in complete metric spaces
  16. Metric completions, the Heine-Borel property, and approachability
  17. Functional identities on upper triangular matrix rings
  18. Uniqueness on entire functions and their nth order exact differences with two shared values
  19. The adaptive finite element method for the Steklov eigenvalue problem in inverse scattering
  20. Existence of a common solution to systems of integral equations via fixed point results
  21. Fixed point results for multivalued mappings of Ćirić type via F-contractions on quasi metric spaces
  22. Some inequalities on the spectral radius of nonnegative tensors
  23. Some results in cone metric spaces with applications in homotopy theory
  24. On the Malcev products of some classes of epigroups, I
  25. Self-injectivity of semigroup algebras
  26. Cauchy matrix and Liouville formula of quaternion impulsive dynamic equations on time scales
  27. On the symmetrized s-divergence
  28. On multivalued Suzuki-type θ-contractions and related applications
  29. Approximation operators based on preconcepts
  30. Two types of hypergeometric degenerate Cauchy numbers
  31. The molecular characterization of anisotropic Herz-type Hardy spaces with two variable exponents
  32. Discussions on the almost 𝒵-contraction
  33. On a predator-prey system interaction under fluctuating water level with nonselective harvesting
  34. On split involutive regular BiHom-Lie superalgebras
  35. Weighted CBMO estimates for commutators of matrix Hausdorff operator on the Heisenberg group
  36. Inverse Sturm-Liouville problem with analytical functions in the boundary condition
  37. The L-ordered L-semihypergroups
  38. Global structure of sign-changing solutions for discrete Dirichlet problems
  39. Analysis of F-contractions in function weighted metric spaces with an application
  40. On finite dual Cayley graphs
  41. Left and right inverse eigenpairs problem with a submatrix constraint for the generalized centrosymmetric matrix
  42. Controllability of fractional stochastic evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and noncompact semigroups
  43. Levinson-type inequalities via new Green functions and Montgomery identity
  44. The core inverse and constrained matrix approximation problem
  45. A pair of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  46. Miscellaneous equalities for idempotent matrices with applications
  47. B-maximal commutators, commutators of B-singular integral operators and B-Riesz potentials on B-Morrey spaces
  48. Rate of convergence of uniform transport processes to a Brownian sheet
  49. Curves in the Lorentz-Minkowski plane with curvature depending on their position
  50. Sequential change-point detection in a multinomial logistic regression model
  51. Tiny zero-sum sequences over some special groups
  52. A boundedness result for Marcinkiewicz integral operator
  53. On a functional equation that has the quadratic-multiplicative property
  54. The spectrum generated by s-numbers and pre-quasi normed Orlicz-Cesáro mean sequence spaces
  55. Positive coincidence points for a class of nonlinear operators and their applications to matrix equations
  56. Asymptotic relations for the products of elements of some positive sequences
  57. Jordan {g,h}-derivations on triangular algebras
  58. A systolic inequality with remainder in the real projective plane
  59. A new characterization of L2(p2)
  60. Nonlinear boundary value problems for mixed-type fractional equations and Ulam-Hyers stability
  61. Asymptotic normality and mean consistency of LS estimators in the errors-in-variables model with dependent errors
  62. Some non-commuting solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation
  63. General (p,q)-mixed projection bodies
  64. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 2
  65. A new approach in the context of ordered incomplete partial b-metric spaces
  66. Sharper existence and uniqueness results for solutions to fourth-order boundary value problems and elastic beam analysis
  67. Remark on subgroup intersection graph of finite abelian groups
  68. Detectable sensation of a stochastic smoking model
  69. Almost Kenmotsu 3-h-manifolds with transversely Killing-type Ricci operators
  70. Some inequalities for star duality of the radial Blaschke-Minkowski homomorphisms
  71. Results on nonlocal stochastic integro-differential equations driven by a fractional Brownian motion
  72. On surrounding quasi-contractions on non-triangular metric spaces
  73. SEMT valuation and strength of subdivided star of K 1,4
  74. Weak solutions and optimal controls of stochastic fractional reaction-diffusion systems
  75. Gradient estimates for a weighted nonlinear parabolic equation and applications
  76. On the equivalence of three-dimensional differential systems
  77. Free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras and typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests
  78. The prime and maximal spectra and the reticulation of residuated lattices with applications to De Morgan residuated lattices
  79. Explicit determinantal formula for a class of banded matrices
  80. Dynamics of a diffusive delayed competition and cooperation system
  81. Error term of the mean value theorem for binary Egyptian fractions
  82. The integral part of a nonlinear form with a square, a cube and a biquadrate
  83. Meromorphic solutions of certain nonlinear difference equations
  84. Characterizations for the potential operators on Carleson curves in local generalized Morrey spaces
  85. Some integral curves with a new frame
  86. Meromorphic exact solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional generalized Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation
  87. Towards a homological generalization of the direct summand theorem
  88. A standard form in (some) free fields: How to construct minimal linear representations
  89. On the determination of the number of positive and negative polynomial zeros and their isolation
  90. Perturbation of the one-dimensional time-independent Schrödinger equation with a rectangular potential barrier
  91. Simply connected topological spaces of weighted composition operators
  92. Generalized derivatives and optimization problems for n-dimensional fuzzy-number-valued functions
  93. A study of uniformities on the space of uniformly continuous mappings
  94. The strong nil-cleanness of semigroup rings
  95. On an equivalence between regular ordered Γ-semigroups and regular ordered semigroups
  96. Evolution of the first eigenvalue of the Laplace operator and the p-Laplace operator under a forced mean curvature flow
  97. Noetherian properties in composite generalized power series rings
  98. Inequalities for the generalized trigonometric and hyperbolic functions
  99. Blow-up analyses in nonlocal reaction diffusion equations with time-dependent coefficients under Neumann boundary conditions
  100. A new characterization of a proper type B semigroup
  101. Constructions of pseudorandom binary lattices using cyclotomic classes in finite fields
  102. Estimates of entropy numbers in probabilistic setting
  103. Ramsey numbers of partial order graphs (comparability graphs) and implications in ring theory
  104. S-shaped connected component of positive solutions for second-order discrete Neumann boundary value problems
  105. The logarithmic mean of two convex functionals
  106. A modified Tikhonov regularization method based on Hermite expansion for solving the Cauchy problem of the Laplace equation
  107. Approximation properties of tensor norms and operator ideals for Banach spaces
  108. A multi-power and multi-splitting inner-outer iteration for PageRank computation
  109. The edge-regular complete maps
  110. Ramanujan’s function k(τ)=r(τ)r2(2τ) and its modularity
  111. Finite groups with some weakly pronormal subgroups
  112. A new refinement of Jensen’s inequality with applications in information theory
  113. Skew-symmetric and essentially unitary operators via Berezin symbols
  114. The limit Riemann solutions to nonisentropic Chaplygin Euler equations
  115. On singularities of real algebraic sets and applications to kinematics
  116. Results on analytic functions defined by Laplace-Stieltjes transforms with perfect ϕ-type
  117. New (p, q)-estimates for different types of integral inequalities via (α, m)-convex mappings
  118. Boundary value problems of Hilfer-type fractional integro-differential equations and inclusions with nonlocal integro-multipoint boundary conditions
  119. Boundary layer analysis for a 2-D Keller-Segel model
  120. On some extensions of Gauss’ work and applications
  121. A study on strongly convex hyper S-subposets in hyper S-posets
  122. On the Gevrey ultradifferentiability of weak solutions of an abstract evolution equation with a scalar type spectral operator on the real axis
  123. Special Issue on Graph Theory (GWGT 2019), Part II
  124. On applications of bipartite graph associated with algebraic structures
  125. Further new results on strong resolving partitions for graphs
  126. The second out-neighborhood for local tournaments
  127. On the N-spectrum of oriented graphs
  128. The H-force sets of the graphs satisfying the condition of Ore’s theorem
  129. Bipartite graphs with close domination and k-domination numbers
  130. On the sandpile model of modified wheels II
  131. Connected even factors in k-tree
  132. On triangular matroids induced by n3-configurations
  133. The domination number of round digraphs
  134. Special Issue on Variational/Hemivariational Inequalities
  135. A new blow-up criterion for the Nabc family of Camassa-Holm type equation with both dissipation and dispersion
  136. On the finite approximate controllability for Hilfer fractional evolution systems with nonlocal conditions
  137. On the well-posedness of differential quasi-variational-hemivariational inequalities
  138. An efficient approach for the numerical solution of fifth-order KdV equations
  139. Generalized fractional integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard-type for a convex function
  140. Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions for a class of robust optimization problems with an interval-valued objective function
  141. An equivalent quasinorm for the Lipschitz space of noncommutative martingales
  142. Optimal control of a viscous generalized θ-type dispersive equation with weak dissipation
  143. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear analysis
  144. Generalized Picone inequalities and their applications to (p,q)-Laplace equations
  145. Positive solutions for parametric (p(z),q(z))-equations
  146. Revisiting the sub- and super-solution method for the classical radial solutions of the mean curvature equation
  147. (p,Q) systems with critical singular exponential nonlinearities in the Heisenberg group
  148. Quasilinear Dirichlet problems with competing operators and convection
  149. Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of (m, n)-Jordan derivations
  150. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications
  151. Instantaneous blow-up of solutions to the Cauchy problem for the fractional Khokhlov-Zabolotskaya equation
  152. Three classes of decomposable distributions
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2020-0014/html
Scroll to top button