Home Free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras and typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests
Article Open Access

Free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras and typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests

  • Jinwei Wang , Yuanyuan Zhang EMAIL logo , Zhicheng Zhu and Dan Chen
Published/Copyright: November 5, 2020

Abstract

In this paper, we decorate leaves and edges of planar rooted forests simultaneously and use a part of them to construct free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras. As a corollary, we obtain the construction of free nonunitary Rota-Baxter algebras.

MSC 2010: 16W99; 16S10; 08B20; 16T30; 81R15

1 Introduction

1.1 Rota-Baxter (family) algebras

An associative algebra R together with a k-linear operator P : R R is called a Rota-Baxter algebra of weight λ , if

(1) P ( x ) P ( y ) = P ( P ( x ) y ) + P ( x P ( y ) ) + λ P ( x y ) , for x , y R ,

where λ is a fixed element in the basis ring k. When λ = 0 , the operator P is indeed an algebraic abstraction of the usual integration operation in analysis [1]. The mathematician Glen E. Baxter first studied the Rota-Baxter algebras [2] in 1960 in his probability study. Some combinatoric properties of Rota-Baxter algebras were studied by Rota [3] and Cartier [4]. Free Rota-Baxter associative algebras were constructed on both commutative and noncommutative cases by using different methods, which appeared in [1,3,4,5,6,7,8]. A Rota-Baxter algebra naturally carries a dendriform or tridendriform algebra structure [9]. Nowadays, Rota-Baxter algebra has become a new branch with broad connections to other objects in mathematics, such as pre-Lie algebras, pre-Poisson algebras [10,11], quantum field theory [12,13,14], Hopf algebras [15,16], commutative algebras [17,18], Loday’s dendriform algebras [9,19], and Aguiar’s associative analogue of the classical Yang-Baxter equation [20,21,22].

In 2007, K. Ebrahimi-Fard, J. Gracia-Bondia and F. Patras [23, Proposition 9.1] (see also [25, Theorem 3.7.2]) introduced the first example of Rota-Baxter family about algebraic aspects of renormalization in quantum field theory, where a “Rota-Baxter family” appears: this terminology was suggested to the authors by Li Guo (see Footnote following Proposition 9.2 therein), who further discussed the underlying structure under the name Rota-Baxter family algebra in [24]. Namely, let Ω be a semigroup and λ k be given. A Rota-Baxter family of weight λ on an algebra R is a collection of k-linear operators ( P ω ) ω Ω on R such that

(2) P α ( a ) P β ( b ) = P α β ( P α ( a ) b + a P β ( b ) + λ a b ) , for a , b R and α , β Ω .

Then the pair ( R , ( P ω ) ω Ω ) is called a Rota-Baxter family algebra of weight λ . Rota-Baxter family algebra arises naturally in renormalization of quantum field theory. It is worthwhile to study the algebraic structure of Rota-Baxter family algebras. As the construction of free objects in a category is always interesting and important, the author in [26] constructed, respectively, free commutative unitary Rota-Baxter family algebras, and free noncommutative unitary Rota-Baxter family algebras by the method of Gröbner-Shirshov bases.

1.2 Algebraic structures on (typed decorated) rooted forests

Rooted trees/forests are a useful tool for studying many interesting algebraic structures. It appeared in the work of Arthur Cayley [27] in the 1850s considered rooted trees as a representation of combinatorial structures related to the free pre-Lie algebra. More than a century later, these structures formed the foundation of John Butcher’s theory of B-series [28,29], which has become an indispensable tool in the analysis of numerical integration. Many Hopf algebraic structures have been built up on top of rooted forests, such as Connes-Kreimer Hopf algebra [15], Loday-Ronco [19], Grossman-Larson [30] and Foissy-Holtkamp [31,32]. In particular, the famous Connes-Kreimer Hopf algebra was employed to deal with renormalization in quantum field theory [13,14]. Pre-Lie structures on non-planar rooted trees lead to Hopf algebras of combinatorial nature, which appeared in the works in [15,30,33]. Free pre-Lie algebras can also be described as the space of non-planar rooted trees with product given by grafting of trees [34].

The multi pre-Lie structures were first introduced in [35] (see Section 4 and Appendix A) in a more general setting before [36] which considered only the non-deformed structures. A recent preprint [37] used typed decorated rooted forests in numerical analysis for developing a general scheme for dispersive partial differential equations (PDEs) which strengths the universal aspect of these structures. Typed decorated rooted forests also appeared in a context of low-dimension topology [38] and in a context of the description of combinatorial species [39].

1.3 Motivation and layout of the paper

Our motivations come from two points. The first point is that it is almost natural to construct free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras, parallel to the unitary case done in [26]. The second point is along the line of typed decorated rooted forests. Recall that Guo [24] constructed free nonunitary Rota-Baxter algebras in terms of leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests. In the present paper, combining typed decorated and leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests, we construct free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras, as a generalization of the work in [24].

The following is the outline of the paper. In Section 2.1, we recall some basic concepts of planar rooted forests used in this paper. Combining leaf decorated and typed decorated planar rooted forests, we propose the concept of (parallelly) typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests in Section 2.2. Based on this concept, we construct the free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebra on a set in Section 2.3. As a corollary, the construction of free nonunitary Rota-Baxter algebra on a set is obtained.

  1. Notation: Throughout this paper, let k be a nonunitary commutative ring which will be the base ring of all modules, algebras, as well as linear maps. Algebras are nonunitary associative algebras but not necessary commutative. For a set Y, we denote by k Y and S ( Y ) the free k-module with a basis Y and free semigroup on Y, respectively.

2 Free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras

In this section, we first propose the concept of parallelly typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests and then use them to construct free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras.

2.1 Planar rooted forests

In this subsection, let us recall some basic concepts of planar rooted forests. A rooted tree is a connected and simply connected set of vertices and oriented edges such that there is precisely one distinguished vertex, called the root, with no incoming edge. The only vertex of the tree is taken to be a leaf. If two vertices of a rooted tree are connected by an edge, then the vertex on the side of the root is called the parent and the vertex on the opposite side of the root is called a child.

A rooted tree is called planar rooted tree if it is endowed with an embedding in the plane. Here are some examples.where the root in a planar rooted tree is at the top. A subforest of a planar rooted tree T is the forest consisting of a set of vertices of T together with their descents and edges connecting all these vertices.

Let T be the set of planar rooted trees and S ( T ) the free semigroup generated by T . Thus, an element in S ( T ) , called a planar rooted forest, is a noncommutative product of planar rooted trees in T . Here are some examples of planar rooted forests.

The following concepts are standard.

Definition 2.1

  1. For a planar rooted tree T, the depth dep ( T ) of T is the maximal length of paths from the root to leaves of the tree. The depth dep ( F ) of a forest F is the maximal depth of trees in F.

  2. For a planar rooted forest F = T 1 T b with T 1 , , T b T , define bre ( F ) b to be the breadth of F.

For example,

In the noncommutative version of the well-known Connes-Kreimer Hopf algebra [31,32], there is a linear grafting operation

(3) B + : k k , T 1 T n B + ( T 1 T n ) ,

where B + ( T 1 T n ) is obtained by adding a new root together with an edge from the new root to the root of each of the planar rooted trees T 1 , , T n . For example,

2.2 Parallelly typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests

In this subsection, we first recall the concept of leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests [24] and then generalize it to parallelly typed version with an eye toward constructing free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras.

Guo utilized leaf-spaced decorated rooted forests to construct free nonunitary Rota-Baxter algebras [24].

Definition 2.2

Let X be a set and T a planar rooted tree.

  1. The tree T is called leaf-decorated if its each leaf is decorated by an element of X.

  2. A subtree starting from a vertex v of T is the planar rooted tree consisting of v, as the root, together with all descents of v and edges connecting all these vertices. If we write the subtree starting from v in the form B + ( T 1 T n ) with T 1 , , T n being planar rooted trees, we call T i and T i + 1 adjacent branches of v, where 1 i n 1 .

  3. A planar rooted tree is called leaf-spaced if it does not have a vertex with adjacent non-leaf branches.

  4. A leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted tree is a leaf-decorated planar rooted tree which is also leaf-spaced.

Let us expose some examples for better understanding.

Example 2.3

The following are leaf-spaced planar rooted trees

while

are not leaf-spaced planar rooted trees, since two right most branches are not separated by a leaf branch.

Example 2.4

The leaf-decorated planar rooted tree

is not leaf-spaced since two right most branches, with leaves decorated by s and v, are not separated by a leaf branch. While the leaf-decorated planar rooted treeis leaf-spaced.

Remark 2.5

For a leaf-spaced planar rooted tree, it doesn’t have a vertex with adjacent non-leaf branches. In the view point of rewriting system, it means that we rewrite the Rota-Baxter equation (1) from left to right. So it is natural to use leaf-spaced planar rooted trees to construct free nonunitary Rota-Baxter algebra in [25].

Now we generalize Definition 2.2 to planar rooted forests.

Definition 2.6

Let X be a set and F = T 1 T n a decorated planar rooted forest, where T 1 , , T n are decorated planar rooted trees. We call F leaf-spaced if T 1 , , T n are leaf-spaced and for each i, at least one of dep ( T i ) and dep ( T i + 1 ) is 0.

Example 2.7

The following are some examples of leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests:

while the following are some counterexamples:Here decorations are from X.

Typed decorated planar rooted trees are planar rooted trees with vertices decorated by elements of a set X and edges decorated by elements of a set Ω , which are applied to give a systematic description of a canonical renormalization procedure of stochastic PDEs [40]. Several algebraic structures have been built up on these planar rooted trees [36].

For a rooted tree T, denote by V ( T ) (resp. E ( T ) ) the set of its vertices (resp. edges).

Definition 2.8

[40] Let X and Ω be two sets. An X- decorated Ω -typed (abbreviated typed decorated) rooted tree is a triple T = ( T , dec, type) , where

  1. T is a rooted tree,

  2. dec : V ( T ) X is a map,

  3. type : E ( T ) Ω is a map.

Here are some examples of typed decorated rooted trees.where x , y , z , u , v X and α , β , γ Ω .

Combining Definitions 2.2 and 2.8, we propose the following concept. For a planar rooted tree T, denote by L ( T ) the set of its leaves.

Definition 2.9

Let X and Ω be two sets. A typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted tree (resp. forest) is a triple T = ( T , dec , type ) , where

  1. T is a leaf-spaced planar rooted tree (resp. forest),

  2. dec : L ( T ) X is a map,

  3. type : E ( T ) Ω is a map.

Example 2.10

Let X and Ω be two sets. For x , y X and α , β , γ Ω ,

are typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted trees.

Now we come to the key concept used in this paper.

Definition 2.11

Let X and Ω be two sets. A typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted tree (resp. forest) is called parallelly typed if type ( e 1 ) = type ( e 2 ) whenever edges e 1 and e 2 share the same parent vertex. Denote by T ( X , Ω ) (resp. ( X , Ω ) ) the set of parallelly typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted trees (resp. forests).

Example 2.12

The following are some elements in ( X , Ω ) :

whilewith α β are two counterexamples not in ( X , Ω ) . The first one is because it is not a leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forest. The second one is because the right most two edges don’t have the same edge decoration. Here x , y , z , s , t , u , v X and α , β Ω .

Remark 2.13

Typed decorated planar rooted forests are allowed different decorations for edges sharing the same parent and are used to construct free Rota-Baxter family algebras [41] and free (tri)dendriform family algebras [42].

The classical grafting operation in Eq. (3) can be adapted to a linear operator B ω + for each ω Ω :

(4) B ω + : k ( X , Ω ) k ( X , Ω ) , T 1 T n B ω + ( T 1 T n ) ,

where B ω + ( T 1 T n ) is the parallelly typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted tree obtained from B + ( T 1 T n ) by decorating all the edges connecting the new root by ω . For example,Then k ( X , Ω ) is closed under the operators B ω + with ω Ω .

2.3 Free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras

This subsection is devoted to construct free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras in terms of parallelly typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests.

Now we are going to equip k ( X , Ω ) with a free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebra structure. Let us first define a multiplication

: k ( X , Ω ) k ( X , Ω ) k ( X , Ω ) .

Definition 2.14

Let X be a set and Ω a semigroup. Let F , F ( X , Ω ) .

  1. If bre ( F ) = 1 = bre ( F ) , then define

    (5) F F F F ( concatenation of planar rooted trees ) , if F = x or F = y ; B α β + ( F ¯ F ) + B α β + ( F F ¯ ) + λ B α β + ( F ¯ F ¯ ) , if F = B α + ( F ¯ ) , F = B β + ( F ¯ ) .

  2. In general, if bre ( F ) = b and bre ( F ) = b , write

F = T 1 T b and F = T 1 T b

and define

(6) F F T 1 T b 1 ( T b T 1 ) T 2 T b .

Let us give an example.

Example 2.15

The concept of the free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebra is given as usual.

Definition 2.16

Let X be a set and let Ω be a semigroup. Let λ k be given. A free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebra of weight λ on X is a nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebra F RBF ( X ) of weight λ together with a set map i X : X F RBF ( X ) that satisfies the following universal property: for any nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebra ( R , R , ( P ω ) ω Ω ) of weight λ and any set map f : X R , there is a unique Rota-Baxter family algebra morphism f ¯ : F RBF ( X ) R such that f = f ¯ i X .

We are ready for our main result. Let us define the set map i X by:

i X : X ( X , Ω ) , x x .

Theorem 2.17

Let X be a set and Ω a semigroup. The triple ( k ( X , Ω ) , , ( B ω + ) ω Ω ) , together with i X , is the free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebra on X.

Proof

We divide the proof into two steps.

Step 1: We prove that ( k ( X , Ω ) , , ( B ω + ) ω Ω ) is a Rota-Baxter family algebra. From Eq. (5), we obtain immediately ( B ω + ) ω Ω is a Rota-Baxter family of weight λ . It remains to prove that satisfies the associativity:

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) , for F 1 , F 2 , F 3 ( X , Ω ) .

We use induction on dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) + dep ( F 3 ) 0 . For the initial step of dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) + dep ( F 3 ) = 0 , we have dep ( F 1 ) = dep ( F 2 ) = dep ( F 3 ) = 0 . Let

F 1 = x 1 , 1 x 1 , 2 x 1 , n 1 , F 2 = x 2 , 1 x 2 , 2 x 2 , n 2 and F 3 = x 3 , 1 x 3 , 2 x 3 , n 3 with x i , n i X for 1 i 3 .

Then by Eq. (6), we have

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = ( x 1 , 1 x 1 , 2 x 1 , n 1 x 2 , 1 x 2 , 2 x 2 , n 2 ) x 3 , 1 x 3 , 2 x 3 , n 3 = x 1 , 1 x 1 , 2 x 1 , n 1 x 2 , 1 x 2 , 2 x 2 , n 2 x 3 , 1 x 3 , 2 x 3 , n 3 = x 1 , 1 x 1 , 2 x 1 , n 1 ( x 2 , 1 x 2 , 2 x 2 , n 2 x 3 , 1 x 3 , 2 x 3 , n 3 ) = F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) .

For the inductive step of dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) + dep ( F 3 ) 1 , we have dep ( F i ) 1 for some i = 1 , 2 , 3 and we use induction on bre ( F 1 ) + bre ( F 2 ) + bre ( F 3 ) 3 . For the initial step of bre ( F 1 ) + bre ( F 2 ) + bre ( F 3 ) = 3 , we have bre ( F 1 ) = bre ( F 2 ) = bre ( F 3 )=1 . There are three cases to consider.

Case 1: F 1 , F 2 and F 3 are of depth greater than zero. Write F 1 = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) , F 2 = B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) and F 3 = B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) . Then

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) = ( B α β + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) + B α β + ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) + λ B α β + ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) = B α β + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) + B α β + ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) + λ B α β + ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) = B α β γ + ( B α β + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) + B α β γ + ( ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) + B α β γ + ( B α β + ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) F ¯ 3 ) + B α β γ + ( ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) F ¯ 3 ) + λ B α β γ + ( B α β + ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) + λ B α β γ + ( ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ 2 B α β γ + ( ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) = B α β γ + ( B α β + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) + B α β γ + ( ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) + B α β γ + ( B α β + ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) F ¯ 3 ) + B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 B β γ + ( B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ( F ¯ 3 ) ) + B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 B β γ + ( F ¯ 2 B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 B β γ + ( F ¯ 2 F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) F ¯ 3 ) + λ B α β γ + ( B α β + ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) + λ B α β γ + ( ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ 2 B α β γ + ( ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) ( by the induction on dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) + dep ( F 3 ) and Eq . ( 5 ) ) .

By a similar calculation, we have

F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) ( B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) = B α β γ + ( B α β + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) + B α β γ + ( B α β + ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) F ¯ 3 ) + λ B α β γ + ( B α β + ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) + B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 B β γ + ( B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 ( B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) F ¯ 3 ) ) + B α β γ + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) ( F ¯ 2 B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) ) + B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 B β γ + ( F ¯ 2 B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 ( F ¯ 2 B γ + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) ( F ¯ 2 F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 B β γ + ( F ¯ 2 F ¯ 3 ) ) + λ 2 B α β γ + ( F ¯ 1 ( F ¯ 2 F ¯ 3 ) ) .

The ith term in the expansion of ( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 matches with the σ ( i ) th term in the expansion of F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) . Here σ is a permutation of order 11:

i σ ( i ) = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 6 9 2 4 7 10 5 3 8 11 .

Case 2: Exactly two of F 1 , F 2 and F 3 are of depth greater than zero. There are three subcases to consider.

Subcase 2.1: F 1 = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) , F 2 = B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) and F 3 = x . Then

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) x = ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) x ( by Eq . (5) ) = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) ( B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) x ) ( by Eq . (6) ) = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) ( B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) x ) ( by Eq . (5) ) = F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) .

Subcase 2.2: F 1 = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) , F 2 = x and F 3 = B β + ( F ¯ 3 ) . Then

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) x ) B β + ( F ¯ 3 ) = ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) x ) B β + ( F ¯ 3 ) ( by Eq . (5) ) = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) x B β + ( F ¯ 3 ) ( by Eqs . (5) and (6)) = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) ( x B β + ( F ¯ 3 ) ) (by Eqs . (5) and (6)) = F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) .

Subcase 2.3: F 1 = x , F 2 = B α + ( F ¯ 2 ) and F 3 = B β + ( F ¯ 3 ) . This case is similar to Subcase 2.1.

Case 3: Exactly one of F 1 , F 2 and F 3 is of depth greater than zero. We have three subcases to consider.

Subcase 3.1: F 1 = B ω + ( F ¯ 1 ) , F 2 = x and F 3 = y . Then

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = ( B ω + ( F ¯ 1 ) x ) y = ( B ω + ( F ¯ 1 ) x ) y (by Eq . (5)) = B ω + ( F ¯ 1 ) x y (by Eqs . (5) and (6)) = B ω + ( F ¯ 1 ) ( x y ) (by Eqs . (5) and (6)) = F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) .

Subcase 3.2: F 1 = x , F 2 = B ω + ( F ¯ 2 ) and F 3 = y . Then

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = ( x B ω + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) y = x B ω + ( F ¯ ) y ( by Eqs . ( 5 ) and ( 6 ) ) = x ( B ω + ( F ¯ 2 ) y ) ( by Eqs . ( 5 ) and ( 6 ) ) = F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) .

Subcase 3.3: F 1 = x , F 2 = y and F 3 = B ω + ( F ¯ 3 ) . This case is similar to Subcase 3.1.

For the inductive step of bre ( F 1 ) + bre ( F 2 ) + bre ( F 3 ) > 3 , we have bre ( F i ) 2 for some i = 1 , 2 , 3 . There are three cases to consider.

Case 4: bre ( F 1 ) 2 . Let F 1 = T 1 , 1 T 1 , 2 T 1 , s 1 with T 1 , 1 , , T 1 , s 1 T ( X , Ω ) and s 1 2 . Then

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = ( ( T 1 , 1 T 1 , 2 T 1 , s 1 ) F 2 ) F 3 = ( T 1 , 1 T 1 , 2 T 1 , s 1 1 ( T 1 , s 1 F 2 ) ) F 3 ( by Eq . ( 6 ) ) = T 1 , 1 T 1 , 2 T 1 , s 1 1 ( ( T 1 , s 1 F 2 ) F 3 ) ( by Eq . ( 6 ) ) = T 1 , 1 T 1 , 2 T 1 , s 1 1 ( T 1 , s 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) ) ( by the induction on bre ( F 1 ) + bre ( F 2 ) + bre ( F 3 ) ) = ( T 1 , 1 T 1 , 2 T 1 , s 1 ) ( F 2 F 3 ) ( by Eq . ( 6 ) ) = F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) .

Case 5: bre ( F 2 ) 2 . Let F 2 = T 2 , 1 T 2 , 2 T 2 , s 2 with T 2 , 1 , , T 2 , s 2 T ( X , Ω ) and s 2 2 . Then

( F 1 F 2 ) F 3 = ( F 1 T 2 , 1 ) T 2 , 2 T 2 , s 2 1 ( T 2 , s 2 F 3 ) ( by Eq . ( 6 ) ) = F 1 ( F 2 F 3 ) .

Case 6: bre ( F 3 ) 2 . This case is similar to Case 4.

Step 2: We show that ( k ( X , Ω ) , , ( B ω + ) ω Ω ) satisfies the universal property. For this, let ( R , R , ( P ω ) ω Ω ) be a nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebra and let f : X R be a set map.

(Existence) We define a linear map

f ¯ : k ( X , Ω ) R , F f ¯ ( F ) ,

by induction on dep ( F ) 0 . Consider the initial step of dep ( F ) = 0 . If bre ( F ) = 1 , then F = x for some x X and define

(7) f ¯ ( x ) f ¯ i X ( x ) f ( x ) .

If bre ( F ) 2 , then F = x 1 x 2 x b for some x 1 , , x b X , and we define

(8) f ¯ ( F ) f ( x 1 ) R R f ( x b ) .

Assume that f ¯ ( F ) has been defined for F ( X , Ω ) with dep ( F ) k for a k 0 and consider F ( X , Ω ) with dep ( F ) = k + 1 1 . If bre ( F ) = 1 , we have F = B ω + ( F ¯ ) for some ω Ω and F ¯ ( X , Ω ) with dep ( F ¯ ) = k . We then define

(9) f ¯ ( F ) f ¯ ( B ω + ( F ¯ ) ) P ω ( f ¯ ( F ¯ ) ) .

If bre ( F ) > 1 , let F = T 1 T b with T 1 , , T b T ( X , Ω ) and define

(10) f ¯ ( F ) f ¯ ( T 1 ) R R f ¯ ( T b ) ,

where each f ¯ ( T i ) , 1 i b is defined by Eq. (7) or Eq. (9).

Now we prove that f ¯ is an algebra homomorphism:

(11) f ¯ ( F 1 F 2 ) = f ¯ ( F 1 ) R f ¯ ( F 2 ) for F 1 , F 2 ( X , Ω ) ,

by induction on the sum of depth dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) 0 . Write

F 1 = T 1 , 1 T 1 , s and F 2 = T 2 , 1 T 2 , t .

If dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) = 0 , then

F 1 = x 1 , 1 x 1 , s and F 2 = x 2 , 1 x 2 , t ,

and so

F 1 F 2 = x 1 , 1 x 1 , s x 2 , 1 x 2 , t .

It follows from Eq. (8) that

f ¯ ( F 1 F 2 ) = f ¯ ( x 1 , 1 x 1 , s x 2 , 1 x 2 , t ) = f ( x 1 , 1 ) R R f ( x 1 , s ) R f ( x 2 , 1 ) R R f ( x 2 , t ) = ( f ( x 1 , 1 ) R R f ( x 1 , s ) ) R ( f ( x 2 , 1 ) R R f ( x 2 , t ) ) = f ¯ ( F 1 ) R f ¯ ( F 2 ) .

For the inductive step, assume that Eq. (11) holds when dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) k for a given k 0 and consider the case of dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) = k + 1 . We reduce to the induction on bre ( F 1 ) + bre ( F 2 ) 2 . For the initial step of bre ( F 1 ) + bre ( F 2 ) = 2 , we have bre ( F 1 ) = 1 = bre ( F 2 ) and F 1 = B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) , F 2 = B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) .

f ¯ ( F 1 F 2 ) = f ¯ ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) = f ¯ ( B α β + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) + B α β + ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) + λ B α β + ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) ) ( by Eq . ( 5 ) ) = f ¯ ( B α β + ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) ) + f ¯ ( B α β + ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) ) + f ¯ ( λ B α β + ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) ) = P α β ( f ¯ ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) F ¯ 2 ) ) + P α β ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 1 B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) ) + λ P α β ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 1 F ¯ 2 ) ) ( by Eq . ( 9 ) ) = P α β ( f ¯ ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) ) R f ¯ ( F ¯ 2 ) ) + P α β ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 1 ) R f ¯ ( B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) ) + λ P α β ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 1 ) R f ¯ ( F ¯ 2 ) ) ( by the induction on dep ( F 1 ) + dep ( F 2 ) ) = P α β ( P α ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 1 ) ) R f ¯ ( F ¯ 2 ) ) + P α β ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 1 ) R P β ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 2 ) ) ) + λ P α β ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 1 ) R f ¯ ( F ¯ 2 ) ) ( by Eq . ( 9 ) ) = P α ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 1 ) ) R P β ( f ¯ ( F ¯ 2 ) ) ( by Eq . ( 2 ) ) = f ¯ ( B α + ( F ¯ 1 ) ) R f ¯ ( B β + ( F ¯ 2 ) ) ( by Eq . ( 9 ) ) = f ¯ ( F 1 ) R f ¯ ( F 2 ) .

For the induction step of bre ( F 1 ) + bre ( F 2 ) 3 , we write

F 1 = T 1 , 1 T 1 , s and F 2 = T 2 , 1 T 2 , t .

Then

f ¯ ( F 1 F 2 ) = f ¯ ( ( T 1 , 1 T 1 , s ) ( T 2 , 1 T 2 , t ) ) = f ¯ ( T 1 , 1 T 1 , s 1 ( T 1 , s T 2 , 1 ) T 2 , 2 T 2 , t ) ( by Eq . ( 6 ) ) = f ¯ ( T 1 , 1 ) R R f ¯ ( T 1 , s 1 ) R f ¯ ( T 1 , s T 2 , 1 ) R f ¯ ( T 2 , 2 ) R R f ¯ ( T 2 , t ) ( by Eq . ( 10 ) ) = f ¯ ( T 1 , 1 ) R R f ¯ ( T 1 , s 1 ) R f ¯ ( T 1 , s ) R f ¯ ( T 2 , 1 ) R f ¯ ( T 2 , 2 ) R R f ¯ ( T 2 , t ) ( by the induction hypothesis on bre ( F 1 ) + bre ( F 2 ) ) = f ¯ ( T 1 , 1 T 1 , s ) R f ¯ ( T 2 , 1 f ¯ ( T 2 , t ) ) ( by Eq . ( 10 ) ) = f ¯ ( F 1 ) R f ¯ ( F 2 ) .

Thus, f ¯ is an algebra homomorphism. Further by Eq. (9),

f ¯ B ω + = P ω f ¯ for ω Ω ,

whence f ¯ is a Rota-Baxter family algebra morphism. Finally, it follows from Eq. (7) that f ¯ i X = f . This completes the proof of existence.

(Uniqueness) Suppose that such f ¯ exists. Then, since f ¯ is a Rota-Baxter family algebra morphism such that f ¯ i X = f , f ¯ ( F ) must be of the forms in Eqs. (7)–(10) for F ( X , Ω ) .□

If Ω is a trivial semigroup, that is, Ω has only one element, then all edges of an element F in ( X , Ω ) are of the same decoration. So we can view F has no edge decoration. In this case, denote ( X ) ( X , Ω ) and notice that Rota-Baxter family Eq. (2) reduces to Rota-Baxter Eq. (1).

Corollary 2.18

Let X be a set. Then the triple ( k ( X ) , , B + ) , together with the i X , is the free nonunitary Rota-Baxter algebra of weight λ on X.

Proof

It follows from Theorem 2.17 by taking Ω to be a trivial semigroup.□

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11771191 and 11861051).

References

[1] Li Guo, An Introduction to Rota-Baxter Algebra, volume 2, International Press, Somerville, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Glen Baxter, An analytic problem whose solution follows from a simple algebraic identity, Pacific J. Math. 10 (1960), no. 3, 731–742.10.2140/pjm.1960.10.731Search in Google Scholar

[3] Gian-Carlo Rota, Baxter algebras and combinatorial identities. I, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 75 (1969), no. 2, 325–329.10.1090/S0002-9904-1969-12156-7Search in Google Scholar

[4] Pierre Cartier, On the structure of free Baxter algebras, Adv. Math. 9 (1972), no. 2, 253–265.10.1016/0001-8708(72)90018-7Search in Google Scholar

[5] Leonid A. Bokut, Yuqun Chen, and Jianjun Qiu, Gröbner-Shirshov bases for associative algebras with multiple operators and free Rota-Baxter algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 214 (2010), no. 1, 89–100.10.1016/j.jpaa.2009.05.005Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kurusch Ebrahimi-Fard and Li Guo, Free Rota-Baxter algebras and rooted trees, J. Algebra Appl. 7 (2008), no. 2, 167–194.10.1142/S0219498808002746Search in Google Scholar

[7] Li Guo and William Keigher, Baxter algebras and shuffle products, Adv. Math. 150 (2000), no. 1, 117–149.10.1006/aima.1999.1858Search in Google Scholar

[8] Li Guo and William Keigher, On free Baxter algebras: completions and the internal construction, Adv. Math. 1 (2000), no. 151, 101–127.10.1006/aima.1999.1867Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kurusch Ebrahimi-Fard and Li Guo, Rota-Baxter algebras and dendriform algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212 (2008), no. 2, 320–339.10.1016/j.jpaa.2007.05.025Search in Google Scholar

[10] Marcelo Aguiar, Pre-poisson algebras, Lett. Math. Phys. 54 (2000), no. 4, 263–277.10.1023/A:1010818119040Search in Google Scholar

[11] Huihui An and Chengming Bai, From Rota-Baxter algebras to pre-lie algebras, J. Phys. A 41 (2007), no. 1, 015201.10.1088/1751-8113/41/1/015201Search in Google Scholar

[12] Alain Connes and Dirk Kreimer, Renormalization in quantum field theory and the Riemann-Hilbert problem I: The Hopf algebra structure of graphs and the main theorem, Comm. Math. Phys. 210 (2000), no. 1, 249–273.10.1007/s002200050779Search in Google Scholar

[13] Kurusch Ebrahimi-Fard, Li Guo, and Dirk Kreimer, Spitzer’s identity and the algebraic Birkhoff decomposition in pQFT, J. Phys. A 37 (2004), 11037–11052.10.1088/0305-4470/37/45/020Search in Google Scholar

[14] Li Guo, Sylvie Paycha, and Bin Zhang, Algebraic Birkhoff factorization and the Euler-Maclaurin formula on cones, Duke Math. J. 166 (2017), no. 3, 537–571.10.1215/00127094-3715303Search in Google Scholar

[15] Alain Connes and Dirk Kreimer, Hopf algebras, renormalization and noncommutative geometry, Commun. Math. Phys. 199 (1998), 203–242.10.1007/978-94-011-4542-8_4Search in Google Scholar

[16] Tianjie Zhang, Xing Gao, and Li Guo, Hopf algebras of rooted forests, cocycles, and free Rota-Baxter algebras, J. Math. Phys. 57 (2016), no. 10, 101701, 10.1063/1.4963727.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Xing Gao, Li Guo, and Markus Rosenkranz, Free integro-differential algebras and Gröbner-Shirshov bases, J. Algebra 442 (2015), 354–396.10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.10.016Search in Google Scholar

[18] Xing Gao, Li Guo, and Shanghua Zheng, Construction of free commutative integro-differential algebras by the method of Gröbner-Shirshov bases, J. Algebra Appl. 13 (2014), no. 05, 1350160, 10.1142/S0219498813501600.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Jean-Louis Loday and Maria Ronco, Trialgebras and families of polytopes, Homotopy theory: relations with algebraic geometry, group cohomology, and algebraic K-theory, Contemp. Math. 346 (2004), 369–398.10.1090/conm/346/06296Search in Google Scholar

[20] Marcelo Aguiar, Infinitesimal Hopf algebras, in: Nicolás Andruskiewitsch, Walter Ricardo Ferrer Santos, Hans-Jürgen Schneider (eds.), New Trends in Hopf Algebra Theory (La Falda, 1999), Contemp. Math. (2000), no. 267, 1–29.10.1090/conm/267/04262Search in Google Scholar

[21] Marcelo Aguiar, On the associative analog of Lie bialgebras, J. Algebra 244 (2001), no. 2, 492–532.10.1006/jabr.2001.8877Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chengming Bai, Li Guo, and Xiang Ni, O-operators on associative algebras and associative Yang-Baxter equations, Pacific J. Math. 256 (2012), no. 2, 257–289.10.2140/pjm.2012.256.257Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kurusch Ebrahimi-Fard, José M Gracia-Bondia, and Frédéric Patras, A Lie theoretic approach to renormalization, Comm. Math. Phys. 276 (2007), no. 2, 519–549.10.1007/s00220-007-0346-8Search in Google Scholar

[24] Li Guo, Operated semigroups, Motzkin paths and rooted trees, J. Algebraic Combin. 29 (2009), no. 1, 35–62.10.1007/s10801-007-0119-7Search in Google Scholar

[25] Erik Panzer, Hopf-algebraic renormalization of Kreimer’s toy model, Master thesis, 2012, University of Berlin, https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.3552.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Yuanyuan Zhang and Xing Gao, Free Rota-Baxter family algebras and (tri) dendriform family algebras, Pacific J. Math. 301 (2019), no. 2, 741–766.10.2140/pjm.2019.301.741Search in Google Scholar

[27] Arthur Cayley, On the theory of the analytical forms called trees, Philos. Mag. (4) 13 (1857), no. 85, 172–176.10.1080/14786445708642275Search in Google Scholar

[28] John C. Butcher, Coefficients for the study of Runge-Kutta integration processes, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 3 (1963), no. 2, 185–201.10.1017/S1446788700027932Search in Google Scholar

[29] John C. Butcher, An algebraic theory of integration methods, Math. Comp. 26 (1972), no. 117, 79–106.10.1090/S0025-5718-1972-0305608-0Search in Google Scholar

[30] Robert Grossman and Richard G. Larson, Hopf-algebraic structures of families of trees, J. Algebra 126 (2007), no. arXiv:0711.3877, 184–210.10.1016/0021-8693(89)90328-1Search in Google Scholar

[31] Loïc Foissy, Les algebres de Hopf des arbres enracinés décorés, I, Bull. Sci. Math. 126 (2002), no. 3, 193–239.10.1016/S0007-4497(02)01108-9Search in Google Scholar

[32] Ralf Holtkamp, Comparison of Hopf algebras on trees, Arch. Math. 80 (2003), no. 4, 368–383.10.1007/s00013-003-0796-ySearch in Google Scholar

[33] Michael Hoffman, Combinatorics of rooted trees and Hopf algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355 (2003), no. 9, 3795–3811.10.1090/S0002-9947-03-03317-8Search in Google Scholar

[34] Frédéric Chapoton and Muriel Livernet, Pre-Lie algebras and the rooted trees operad, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2001 (2001), no. 8, 395–408.10.1155/S1073792801000198Search in Google Scholar

[35] Yvain Bruned, Ajay Chandra, Ilya Chevyrev, and Martin Hairer, Renormalising SPDEs in regularity structures, arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.10239 (2017).Search in Google Scholar

[36] Loïc Foissy, Algebraic structures on typed decorated rooted trees, arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.07572 (2018).Search in Google Scholar

[37] Yvain Bruned and Katharina Schratz, Resonance based schemes for dispersive equations via decorated trees, arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01649 (2020).Search in Google Scholar

[38] Richard J. Mathar, Topologically distinct sets of non-intersecting circles in the plane, arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.00077 (2016).Search in Google Scholar

[39] François Bergeron, F. Bergeron, Gilbert Labelle, and Pierre Leroux, Combinatorial Species and Tree-Like Structures, volume 67, Cambridge University Press, 1998.10.1017/CBO9781107325913Search in Google Scholar

[40] Yvain Bruned, Martin Hairer, and Lorenzo Zambotti, Algebraic renormalisation of regularity structures, Invent. Math. 215 (2019), 1039–1156, 10.1007/s00222-018-0841-x.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Yuanyuan Zhang, Xing Gao, and Dominique Manchon, Free Rota-Baxter family algebras and free (tri) dendriform family algebras, arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.04448 (2020).10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.11.027Search in Google Scholar

[42] Yuanyuan Zhang, Xing Gao, and Dominique Manchon, Free (tri) dendriform family algebras, J. Algebra 547 (2020), 456–493.10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.11.027Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-01-21
Revised: 2020-06-23
Accepted: 2020-07-01
Published Online: 2020-11-05

© 2020 Jinwei Wang et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Non-occurrence of the Lavrentiev phenomenon for a class of convex nonautonomous Lagrangians
  3. Strong and weak convergence of Ishikawa iterations for best proximity pairs
  4. Curve and surface construction based on the generalized toric-Bernstein basis functions
  5. The non-negative spectrum of a digraph
  6. Bounds on F-index of tricyclic graphs with fixed pendant vertices
  7. Crank-Nicolson orthogonal spline collocation method combined with WSGI difference scheme for the two-dimensional time-fractional diffusion-wave equation
  8. Hardy’s inequalities and integral operators on Herz-Morrey spaces
  9. The 2-pebbling property of squares of paths and Graham’s conjecture
  10. Existence conditions for periodic solutions of second-order neutral delay differential equations with piecewise constant arguments
  11. Orthogonal polynomials for exponential weights x2α(1 – x2)2ρe–2Q(x) on [0, 1)
  12. Rough sets based on fuzzy ideals in distributive lattices
  13. On more general forms of proportional fractional operators
  14. The hyperbolic polygons of type (ϵ, n) and Möbius transformations
  15. Tripled best proximity point in complete metric spaces
  16. Metric completions, the Heine-Borel property, and approachability
  17. Functional identities on upper triangular matrix rings
  18. Uniqueness on entire functions and their nth order exact differences with two shared values
  19. The adaptive finite element method for the Steklov eigenvalue problem in inverse scattering
  20. Existence of a common solution to systems of integral equations via fixed point results
  21. Fixed point results for multivalued mappings of Ćirić type via F-contractions on quasi metric spaces
  22. Some inequalities on the spectral radius of nonnegative tensors
  23. Some results in cone metric spaces with applications in homotopy theory
  24. On the Malcev products of some classes of epigroups, I
  25. Self-injectivity of semigroup algebras
  26. Cauchy matrix and Liouville formula of quaternion impulsive dynamic equations on time scales
  27. On the symmetrized s-divergence
  28. On multivalued Suzuki-type θ-contractions and related applications
  29. Approximation operators based on preconcepts
  30. Two types of hypergeometric degenerate Cauchy numbers
  31. The molecular characterization of anisotropic Herz-type Hardy spaces with two variable exponents
  32. Discussions on the almost 𝒵-contraction
  33. On a predator-prey system interaction under fluctuating water level with nonselective harvesting
  34. On split involutive regular BiHom-Lie superalgebras
  35. Weighted CBMO estimates for commutators of matrix Hausdorff operator on the Heisenberg group
  36. Inverse Sturm-Liouville problem with analytical functions in the boundary condition
  37. The L-ordered L-semihypergroups
  38. Global structure of sign-changing solutions for discrete Dirichlet problems
  39. Analysis of F-contractions in function weighted metric spaces with an application
  40. On finite dual Cayley graphs
  41. Left and right inverse eigenpairs problem with a submatrix constraint for the generalized centrosymmetric matrix
  42. Controllability of fractional stochastic evolution equations with nonlocal conditions and noncompact semigroups
  43. Levinson-type inequalities via new Green functions and Montgomery identity
  44. The core inverse and constrained matrix approximation problem
  45. A pair of equations in unlike powers of primes and powers of 2
  46. Miscellaneous equalities for idempotent matrices with applications
  47. B-maximal commutators, commutators of B-singular integral operators and B-Riesz potentials on B-Morrey spaces
  48. Rate of convergence of uniform transport processes to a Brownian sheet
  49. Curves in the Lorentz-Minkowski plane with curvature depending on their position
  50. Sequential change-point detection in a multinomial logistic regression model
  51. Tiny zero-sum sequences over some special groups
  52. A boundedness result for Marcinkiewicz integral operator
  53. On a functional equation that has the quadratic-multiplicative property
  54. The spectrum generated by s-numbers and pre-quasi normed Orlicz-Cesáro mean sequence spaces
  55. Positive coincidence points for a class of nonlinear operators and their applications to matrix equations
  56. Asymptotic relations for the products of elements of some positive sequences
  57. Jordan {g,h}-derivations on triangular algebras
  58. A systolic inequality with remainder in the real projective plane
  59. A new characterization of L2(p2)
  60. Nonlinear boundary value problems for mixed-type fractional equations and Ulam-Hyers stability
  61. Asymptotic normality and mean consistency of LS estimators in the errors-in-variables model with dependent errors
  62. Some non-commuting solutions of the Yang-Baxter-like matrix equation
  63. General (p,q)-mixed projection bodies
  64. An extension of the method of brackets. Part 2
  65. A new approach in the context of ordered incomplete partial b-metric spaces
  66. Sharper existence and uniqueness results for solutions to fourth-order boundary value problems and elastic beam analysis
  67. Remark on subgroup intersection graph of finite abelian groups
  68. Detectable sensation of a stochastic smoking model
  69. Almost Kenmotsu 3-h-manifolds with transversely Killing-type Ricci operators
  70. Some inequalities for star duality of the radial Blaschke-Minkowski homomorphisms
  71. Results on nonlocal stochastic integro-differential equations driven by a fractional Brownian motion
  72. On surrounding quasi-contractions on non-triangular metric spaces
  73. SEMT valuation and strength of subdivided star of K 1,4
  74. Weak solutions and optimal controls of stochastic fractional reaction-diffusion systems
  75. Gradient estimates for a weighted nonlinear parabolic equation and applications
  76. On the equivalence of three-dimensional differential systems
  77. Free nonunitary Rota-Baxter family algebras and typed leaf-spaced decorated planar rooted forests
  78. The prime and maximal spectra and the reticulation of residuated lattices with applications to De Morgan residuated lattices
  79. Explicit determinantal formula for a class of banded matrices
  80. Dynamics of a diffusive delayed competition and cooperation system
  81. Error term of the mean value theorem for binary Egyptian fractions
  82. The integral part of a nonlinear form with a square, a cube and a biquadrate
  83. Meromorphic solutions of certain nonlinear difference equations
  84. Characterizations for the potential operators on Carleson curves in local generalized Morrey spaces
  85. Some integral curves with a new frame
  86. Meromorphic exact solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional generalized Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation
  87. Towards a homological generalization of the direct summand theorem
  88. A standard form in (some) free fields: How to construct minimal linear representations
  89. On the determination of the number of positive and negative polynomial zeros and their isolation
  90. Perturbation of the one-dimensional time-independent Schrödinger equation with a rectangular potential barrier
  91. Simply connected topological spaces of weighted composition operators
  92. Generalized derivatives and optimization problems for n-dimensional fuzzy-number-valued functions
  93. A study of uniformities on the space of uniformly continuous mappings
  94. The strong nil-cleanness of semigroup rings
  95. On an equivalence between regular ordered Γ-semigroups and regular ordered semigroups
  96. Evolution of the first eigenvalue of the Laplace operator and the p-Laplace operator under a forced mean curvature flow
  97. Noetherian properties in composite generalized power series rings
  98. Inequalities for the generalized trigonometric and hyperbolic functions
  99. Blow-up analyses in nonlocal reaction diffusion equations with time-dependent coefficients under Neumann boundary conditions
  100. A new characterization of a proper type B semigroup
  101. Constructions of pseudorandom binary lattices using cyclotomic classes in finite fields
  102. Estimates of entropy numbers in probabilistic setting
  103. Ramsey numbers of partial order graphs (comparability graphs) and implications in ring theory
  104. S-shaped connected component of positive solutions for second-order discrete Neumann boundary value problems
  105. The logarithmic mean of two convex functionals
  106. A modified Tikhonov regularization method based on Hermite expansion for solving the Cauchy problem of the Laplace equation
  107. Approximation properties of tensor norms and operator ideals for Banach spaces
  108. A multi-power and multi-splitting inner-outer iteration for PageRank computation
  109. The edge-regular complete maps
  110. Ramanujan’s function k(τ)=r(τ)r2(2τ) and its modularity
  111. Finite groups with some weakly pronormal subgroups
  112. A new refinement of Jensen’s inequality with applications in information theory
  113. Skew-symmetric and essentially unitary operators via Berezin symbols
  114. The limit Riemann solutions to nonisentropic Chaplygin Euler equations
  115. On singularities of real algebraic sets and applications to kinematics
  116. Results on analytic functions defined by Laplace-Stieltjes transforms with perfect ϕ-type
  117. New (p, q)-estimates for different types of integral inequalities via (α, m)-convex mappings
  118. Boundary value problems of Hilfer-type fractional integro-differential equations and inclusions with nonlocal integro-multipoint boundary conditions
  119. Boundary layer analysis for a 2-D Keller-Segel model
  120. On some extensions of Gauss’ work and applications
  121. A study on strongly convex hyper S-subposets in hyper S-posets
  122. On the Gevrey ultradifferentiability of weak solutions of an abstract evolution equation with a scalar type spectral operator on the real axis
  123. Special Issue on Graph Theory (GWGT 2019), Part II
  124. On applications of bipartite graph associated with algebraic structures
  125. Further new results on strong resolving partitions for graphs
  126. The second out-neighborhood for local tournaments
  127. On the N-spectrum of oriented graphs
  128. The H-force sets of the graphs satisfying the condition of Ore’s theorem
  129. Bipartite graphs with close domination and k-domination numbers
  130. On the sandpile model of modified wheels II
  131. Connected even factors in k-tree
  132. On triangular matroids induced by n3-configurations
  133. The domination number of round digraphs
  134. Special Issue on Variational/Hemivariational Inequalities
  135. A new blow-up criterion for the Nabc family of Camassa-Holm type equation with both dissipation and dispersion
  136. On the finite approximate controllability for Hilfer fractional evolution systems with nonlocal conditions
  137. On the well-posedness of differential quasi-variational-hemivariational inequalities
  138. An efficient approach for the numerical solution of fifth-order KdV equations
  139. Generalized fractional integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard-type for a convex function
  140. Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions for a class of robust optimization problems with an interval-valued objective function
  141. An equivalent quasinorm for the Lipschitz space of noncommutative martingales
  142. Optimal control of a viscous generalized θ-type dispersive equation with weak dissipation
  143. Special Issue on Problems, Methods and Applications of Nonlinear analysis
  144. Generalized Picone inequalities and their applications to (p,q)-Laplace equations
  145. Positive solutions for parametric (p(z),q(z))-equations
  146. Revisiting the sub- and super-solution method for the classical radial solutions of the mean curvature equation
  147. (p,Q) systems with critical singular exponential nonlinearities in the Heisenberg group
  148. Quasilinear Dirichlet problems with competing operators and convection
  149. Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of (m, n)-Jordan derivations
  150. Special Issue on Evolution Equations, Theory and Applications
  151. Instantaneous blow-up of solutions to the Cauchy problem for the fractional Khokhlov-Zabolotskaya equation
  152. Three classes of decomposable distributions
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/math-2020-0059/html
Scroll to top button