Startseite The Differential Pressure Signal De-noised by Domain Transform Combined with Wavelet Threshold
Artikel Open Access

The Differential Pressure Signal De-noised by Domain Transform Combined with Wavelet Threshold

  • Yuhao Zhang , Haihui Wang EMAIL logo und Chao Li
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. März 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In the process of estimating the thrust of an aircraft engine, there is a big problem that the differential pressure signal has large fluctuation. To deal with this problem, we develop an effective and robust adaptive de-noising algorithm based on domain transform combined with wavelet transform (D-WT). First, we do the domain transform for the signal, then sample the transformed signal, and finally the wavelet threshold transform is performed for the signal. Compared with the traditional wavelet transforms, the D-WT method filters the noise effectively and keeps more details.

1 Introduction

Thrust is the most important indicator of an aircraft engine. The indoor test station is an important platform for aero engine performance testing. Currently all engine thrust in research needs to be tested at the indoor test station, but signals from various sensors have large differences. Some signals have large fluctuation which almost obscures the true signal and make it very difficult for data processing, especially differential pressure signal. The error generated by aero engine’s thrust measure in upwind environment is a system error, which needs to be corrected, so the de-noising process is needed.

Wavelet transform has good time-frequency localization properties, low entropy, multi-resolution properties, decorrelation and wavelets selection diversity, so there are many popular de-noising methods, especially traditional wavelet threshold algorithms have been extensively studied and obtained good results in signal processing. Traditional wavelet transform includes soft threshold function and hard threshold function. The soft threshold function has good continuity, but it always has a constant deviation, which will lose some signal characteristic information. Although the hard threshold function does not have a constant deviation, the generated signal de-noised by it produces additional oscillation, and the result is not continuous [14].

Domain transform is a distance-preserving transform. By preserving the distance between two points on two-dimensional space curve to the one-dimensional real axis, the conversion of variable domain has come true [510].

2 The Wavelet Threshold De-noising Algorithm

2.1 Traditional wavelet threshold de-noising algorithm

The main theories of wavelet threshold de-noising algorithm: Wavelet transform, especially orthogonal wavelet transform can efficiently eliminate the correlation coefficients. It enables the signal energy to be concentrated in some large wavelet coefficients while the noisy energy to be distributed throughout the wavelet domain. Usually, the amplitude of signal wavelet coefficients is greater than the amplitude of noisy wavelet coefficients. Therefore, we can select an appropriate threshold function to keep the signal coefficients and reduce most of the noisy coefficients to zero.

Traditional wavelet threshold de-noising algorithm has three steps:

  1. Wavelet decomposition: Select the appropriate wavelet function and decomposition level, so we obtain the wavelet coefficients by decomposing the noisy signal.

  2. High-frequency coefficients thresholding: Select the appropriate threshold to process the high-frequency coefficients, then get new wavelet coefficients.

  3. Reconstruct the signal: The estimated signal is obtained by reconstructing the signal with all the low-frequency coefficients and the high-frequency coefficients obtained by the second step.

Traditional wavelet functions mainly include hard threshold function and soft threshold function as the following:

  1. Hard Threshold Function

    w~j,k=wj,k|wj,k|λ0|wj,k|<λ
  2. Soft Threshold Function

    w~j,k=wj,kλ|wj,k|λ0|wj,k|<λwj,k+λwj,kλ

where λ is the threshold, wj,k is the wavelet coefficient.

There are many methods to determine the threshold, especially the global uniform threshold is one of the most famous methods among them. This method takes threshold λ=σ2logN, where σ is the standard deviation of the signal, and N represents the length of the noisy signal.

The soft threshold function has good continuity, but it always has a constant deviation, which will lose some signal characteristic information that is very important for the signal processing. Although the hard threshold function does not have a constant deviation, it causes additional oscillation to the de-noised signal and discontinuouity [14].

2.2 Improved wavelet threshold algorithm

To overcome the disadvantages of hard threshold function and soft threshold function, we proposed an improved threshold function as follows:

w~j,k=(1α)wj,k+αsign(wj,k)(wj,k)2λj2|wj,k|λj0|wj,k|<λj

where

λj=σ2logNlog(j+1)α=λj|wj,k|exp(wj,k2λj2N)

Here j is the decomposition level, λj is an adaptive threshold, σ is the standard deviation of the signal, N represents the length of the noisy signal and wj,k is the wavelet coefficient.

When |wj,k| = λj, then α = 1, w~j,k=0, the value of w~j,k is equal to the estimated value of soft threshold function.

When |wj,k| → λj, then α → 1, w~j,k → 0, So w~j,k is continuous at |wj,k| = λj.

When |wj,k| → ∞, then α→ 0, w~j,kwj,k. It overcomes the weakness that w~j,k and wj,k always have constant bias.

3 Domain Transform

For deriving an isometric 1D transform, let I : ΩR, Ω = [0, +∞) ⊂ R be a 1D signal, which defines a curve C in R2 by the graph (x, I(x)), for xΩ. Our goal is to find a transform t : R2R which preserves, in R, the original distances between points on C, given by some metric. Thus, let S = {x0, x1, L, xn} be a sampling of Ω, where xi1+ = xi + h, for some sampling interval h. We seek a transform t : R2R that satisfies

|t(xi,I(xi))t(xj,I(xj))|=(xi,I(xi))(xj,I(xj))(1)

where xi, xjS, |⋅| is the absolute value operator, and ∥⋅∥ is some chosen metric. For simplicity, we use the nearest neighbor l1 norm; thus, t only needs to preserve the distances between neighboring samples xi and xi+1. Finally, let ct(x)=t(x^)=t(x,I(x)). To be isometric, the desired transform must satisfy the following equality (in l1 norm)

ct(x+h)ct(x)=h+|I(x+h)I(x)|(2)

which states that the Euclidean distance between neighboring samples in the new domain (R) must equal the l1 distance between them in the original domain (R2). To avoid the need for the absolute value operator on the left of (2), we constrain ct to be monotonically increasing—i.e. ct(x + h) ≥ ct(x). Dividing both sides of (2) by h and taking the limit as h → 0, we obtain

ct(x)=1+|I(x)|(3)

where ct(x) denotes the derivative of ct(x) with respect to x. Integrating (3) on both sides and letting ct(0) = 0, we get

ct(u)=0u1+|I(x)|dx,uΩ(4)

Intuitively, ct is “unfolding” the curve C defined in R2 into R, while preserving the distances among neighboring samples. Moreover, for any two points u and w in Ω, w > u, the distance between them in the new domain is given by

ct(w)ct(u)=uw1+|I(x)|dx(5)

Which is the arc length of curve C in the interval [u, w] under the l1 norm. As such, the transformation given by Equation (4) preserves the geodesic distance between all points on the curve. A similar derivation is possible for the l2 norm or perhaps other metrics [5].

4 Domain-Wavelet Algorithm

In this section, we derive the proposed algorithm by combining domain transform with wavelet threshold algorithm, naming it here as the Domain-Wavelet algorithm, which has the following steps:

  1. Calculating domain transformation t

    We suppose that the original signal I : ΩR.{x0, x1, L, xn} is a division of Ω with the step size h. Let

    t(xi)=I(x0)+x0i=0t(xi1)+|I(x1)I(xi1)|+hi=1,2,L,n

    Obviously, t is a distance-preserving transform based on l1 norm and t is also an increasing function. Let I(ti)= I(t(xi)) = I(xi), i = 0, 1, L, n.

  2. Resampling

    Since the value of ti+1ti which is related to i is not a constant, we need to resample. Take the interval [t(xi), t(xi+1] as an example.

    Let m=minit(xi)=t(x0),M=maxit(xi)=t(xn),h = (Mm)/6n, h is a new step size. So the interval [t(xi), t(xi+1)] contains the set of points {tki,k=0,L,ti+1tih} after resampling.

    Here, we let

    xki=tkititi+1ti(xi+1xi)+xii=0,L,n1;k=0,L,ti+1tihI(tki)=I(xki)=tkititi+1ti(I(xi+1)I(xi))+I(xi)

    So the resampled signal is {(tki,I(tki)),i=0,L,n1;k=0,L,ti+1tih}.

  3. De-noising

    We use the new wavelet threshold algorithm proposed in section 2.2 to process the signal {(tki,I(tki)),i=0,L,n1;k=0,L,ti+1tih}. Let the number of decomposition level is equal to J and de-noising results is I~(tk).

  4. Restoring samples

    To reconstruct the original signal, we just take points (t0i,I~(t0i)),i=0,1,L,n. Apparently, the de-noising signal is (x,I~(t(xi)))),i=0,1,L,n.

  5. Second De-noising

    During the resampling process at step 2, it generates some redundant information for the signal, so we choose the wavelet threshold algorithms to de-noise the signal (x,I~(t(xi))) again. Let the decomposition level is equal to J.

5 Applications

In many applications, it is very important to separate the noise from the true signal, which could reveal the physical mechanism under the signal. For the purpose of illustration, we consider both the synthetic signals and the differential pressure signals. These numerical examples demonstrate the effectiveness of the Domain-Wavelet algorithm, proposed in this paper. For the bump signal with length N=1024, we add the zero-mean Gaussian noise to it. Here the signal–to-noise ratio (SNR) is defined by

SNR=20lgff^2n||2

where f stands for the original signal, and f^ represents the noisy signal. The input signals are depicted in Fig. 1.

Figure 1 Left: Original Signal. Right: noisy bump.
Figure 1

Left: Original Signal. Right: noisy bump.

To verify domain-wavelet algorithm introduced above is superior in terms of de-noising synthetic signal, we choose wavelet threshold algorithm and domain-wavelet algorithm to process the synthetic signal (see Fig. 1). From Fig. 2, we know that the de-noised signals are much better when the domain-wavelet method is used, relative to those generatefd using the traditional wavelet threshold methods, including both hard threshold and soft threshold.

Figure 2 De-noising Results for the Bump signal. (a) Hard threshold (b) Soft threshold (c) Domain-Wavelet (Hard threshold) (d) Domain-Wavelet (Hard threshold).
Figure 2

De-noising Results for the Bump signal. (a) Hard threshold (b) Soft threshold (c) Domain-Wavelet (Hard threshold) (d) Domain-Wavelet (Hard threshold).

Here in the experiments, we choose wavelet function as ‘db8’, the decomposition level of wavelet threshold algorithm is 5 and the decomposition level of domain-wavelet algorithm are J = 8 and J = 5 separately. We now demonstrate the de-noising results of the traditional wavelet threshold methods and domain-wavelet method in Fig. 2.

Table 1

Results of the de-noised Bump signal with four methods.

AlgorithmSNR/dB
Wavelet threshold (Hard threshold)26.7408
Wavelet threshold (Soft threshold)24.0098
Domain-wavelet(Hard threshold)26.9288
Domain-wavelet (Soft threshold)27.5421

Fig. 3(a) shows the SNR curve with the decomposition levels using hard threshold and domain-wavelet algorithm, while (b) show the SNR curve with the decomposition level using the soft threshold and domain-wavelet algorithm.

The de-noising approaches based on wavelet threshold and domain-wavelet algorithm are denoted by Hard, Domain (hard), Soft, Domain (soft), respectively, for convenience. Fig. 3 show the SNRs of the four de-noised signals obtained by the different methods introduced in section 2 and section 4 separately, when the decomposition level equal to 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9. We note that the SNR curves obtained by the domain-wavelet are larger than those obtained with the traditional wavelet threshold, either using soft or hard threshold. It indicates that the proposed domain-wavelet algorithm is more suitable for de-noising the synthetic signals so as to obtain much more efficient and accurate de-noised results in the future.

Figure 3 Comparison between wavelet threshold results and domain-wavelet results by using hard threshold (a) and soft threshold (b).
Figure 3

Comparison between wavelet threshold results and domain-wavelet results by using hard threshold (a) and soft threshold (b).

Subsequently, we apply both the wavelet threshold and Domain-Wavelet algorithm to process the true signal. Here we select a differential pressure signal that has 45855 samples, it is shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 4 Differential pressure signal.
Figure 4

Differential pressure signal.

Here we choose wavelet function as “db6”, the decomposition level of wavelet threshold algorithm is 8 and the decomposition level of domain-wavelet algorithm are J=13 and J =8, respectively. The results following de-noising with the four methods are illustrated in Fig. 5.

Figure 5 De-noised Results of the differential pressure signal.
Figure 5

De-noised Results of the differential pressure signal.

Fig. 5 from (a) to (d) show the waveforms of de-noised differential pressure signals using the wavelet threshold and domain-wavelet algorithm. It is noted that the de-noised pressure signal using the domain-wavelet are much improved relative to the pressure signal de-noised by the wavelet threshold for both hard threshold and soft threshold. It manifests that domain-wavelet algorithm is superior to wavelet threshold in small waveform distortion and low energy losses of de-noised signals.

To give an objective evaluation criteria, we introduce the concept of smoothness index, which is defined as follows:

r=n[f^(n+1)f^(n)]2n[f(n+1)f(n)]2

Where, f(u) is noisy signal, f^(n) is de-noised signal. The index reflects the smoothing degree of de-noised signal. Smoothing is an important index for judging the effect of de-noised signal. The results show that the smaller the smoothness index, the better the de-noising results.

Table 2 shows the smoothness index of de-noised differential pressure signals obtained by hard threshold, soft threshold, domain-wavelet (hard) and domain-wavelet (soft). The de-noised differential pressure signals obtained by domain-wavelet have very small smoothness index, compared to those obtained by wavelet thresholds. Their smoothness indexes are less than 10% the smoothness indexes of the de-noised signals obtained by wavelet thresholds. The smaller the smoothness index, the more helpful for extracting features of the differential pressure signals, and thus, also helpful for obtaining successful pattern recognition of the differential pressure signals.

Table 2

The smoothness index of the de-noised differential pressure signals.

AlgorithmSmoothness Index
Wavelet threshold (Hard threshold)0.6517
Wavelet threshold (Soft threshold)0.2318
Domain-wavelet (Hard threshold)0.033
Domain-wavelet (Soft threshold)0.0251

Further, we demonstrate the relation between decomposition level and the smoothness index by using wavelet threshold and domain-wavelet for hard threshold and soft threshold (see Fig. 6).

Figure 6 Comparison of The smoothness index between wavelet threshold results and domain-wavelet results by using hard threshold (a) and soft threshold (b).
Figure 6

Comparison of The smoothness index between wavelet threshold results and domain-wavelet results by using hard threshold (a) and soft threshold (b).

Fig. 6 shows that the domain-wavelet algorithm is superior to wavelet threshold algorithm, the de-noising results of domain-wavelet algorithm are also relatively stable for different decomposition levels.

6 Conclusions

Thrust is the most important indicator of an aircraft engine. The indoor test station is an important platform for aero engine performance testing. Currently all engine thrust in research needs to be tested at the indoor test station, but signals from various sensors have large differences. Some signals have large fluctuation which almost obscures the true signal and make it very difficult for data processing, especially for the differential pressure signal. The error generated by aero engine’s thrust measure in upwind environment is a system error, which needs to be corrected.

Based on domain transform and wavelet threshold algorithm, we propose a new de-noising method: Domain-Wavelet Algorithm. First, transformed the signal domain transform, then sampled the transformed signal, and finally the wavelet threshold algorithm was performed for the signal. By observing the de-noised signal and comparing the SNR values we conclude that domain-wavelet algorithm is superior to traditional wavelet threshold algorithms. For the differential pressure signal, there are no original signals, so we use the smoothness index which is similar to SNR. It also proves that the new method proposed in this paper can optimize de-noising results relative to traditional wavelet threshold methods.

As shown in Figure 3 and Figure 6, the domain-wavelet algorithm achieved higher SNR and lower smoothness index for both the synthetic signal and the differential pressure signal, in comparison with the traditional wavelet threshold algorithms. However, it’s running time is longer than the traditional wavelet threshold algorithms, because of the resampling procedure in within the domain-wavelet algorithm, which increases the size of data and affects the operational speed. In the future, the running time of domain-wavelet algorithm we proposed in this paper should be shortened and this algorithm should be tested for other signal processing.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the fund of National Basic Research Program of China (52850301) and 973 Grant(73026101).

References

[1] Bo M., Zhiping L., Haihui W., et al., An improved wavelet adaptive logarithmic threshold denoising method for analysing pressure signals in a transonic compressor. Mechanical Engineering Science., 2015, 229, 2023–203010.1177/0954406214550512Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Jaiswal A., Upadhyay J., Somkuwar A., Image denoising and quality measurements by using filtering and wavelet based techniques, AEU-Int J Electronics Commun., 2014, 68, 699–70510.1016/j.aeue.2014.02.003Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Liu J., Li Z., Antcolony combined with adaptive threshold denoising and reconstruct for THz image, Optik., 2014, 125, 3423–342710.1016/j.ijleo.2014.01.042Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Maoyi L., Wei Y., Yajun L., et al., Experiments of effects of inlet-air distortion on aerodynamic performance in transonic compressor, Aerospace Power, J. 2013, 28Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Eduardo S.L., Manuel M., et al., Domain Transform for Edge-Aware Image and Video Processing, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2011, 30(4), 69:1–69:1210.1145/2010324.1964964Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Miao H., Xiaohui B., Minying Z., et al., Edge-aware Gradient Domain Optimization Framework for Image Filtering by Local Propagation, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition., 2014, 2838-2845Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Karacan L., Erdem E., Erdem A., Structure-Preserving Image Smoothing via Region Covariances, ACM Transactions Graph., 2013, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2508363.250840310.1145/2508363.2508403Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Zhuo S., Xiaonan L., Zhengjie D., et al., Edge-Preserving Texture Suppression Filter Based on Joint Filtering Schemes, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia., 2013, 535-54810.1109/TMM.2012.2237025Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Federico P., Philipp K., Yael P., et al., Saliency Filters: Contrast Based Filtering for Salient Region Detection, IEEE., 2012, 733-740Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Holger W., Ian E.K., Scen C.O., An extended difference-of-Gaussians compendium including advanced image stylization, Computers & Graphics., 2012, 36, 740-75310.1016/j.cag.2012.03.004Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-10-10
Accepted: 2017-1-27
Published Online: 2017-3-20

© 2017 Yuhao Zhang et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. The Differential Pressure Signal De-noised by Domain Transform Combined with Wavelet Threshold
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Robot-operated quality control station based on the UTT method
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Regression Models and Fuzzy Logic Prediction of TBM Penetration Rate
  7. Regular Articles
  8. Numerical study of chemically reacting unsteady Casson fluid flow past a stretching surface with cross diffusion and thermal radiation
  9. Regular Articles
  10. Experimental comparison between R409A and R437A performance in a heat pump unit
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Rapid prediction of damage on a struck ship accounting for side impact scenario models
  13. Regular Articles
  14. Implementation of Non-Destructive Evaluation and Process Monitoring in DLP-based Additive Manufacturing
  15. Regular Articles
  16. Air purification in industrial plants producing automotive rubber components in terms of energy efficiency
  17. Regular Articles
  18. On cyclic yield strength in definition of limits for characterisation of fatigue and creep behaviour
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Development of an operation strategy for hydrogen production using solar PV energy based on fluid dynamic aspects
  21. Regular Articles
  22. An exponential-related function for decision-making in engineering and management
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Usability Prediction & Ranking of SDLC Models Using Fuzzy Hierarchical Usability Model
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Exact Soliton and Kink Solutions for New (3+1)-Dimensional Nonlinear Modified Equations of Wave Propagation
  27. Regular Articles
  28. Entropy generation analysis and effects of slip conditions on micropolar fluid flow due to a rotating disk
  29. Regular Articles
  30. Application of the mode-shape expansion based on model order reduction methods to a composite structure
  31. Regular Articles
  32. A Combinatory Index based Optimal Reallocation of Generators in the presence of SVC using Krill Herd Algorithm
  33. Regular Articles
  34. Quality assessment of compost prepared with municipal solid waste
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Influence of polymer fibers on rheological properties of cement mortars
  37. Regular Articles
  38. Degradation of flood embankments – Results of observation of the destruction mechanism and comparison with a numerical model
  39. Regular Articles
  40. Mechanical Design of Innovative Electromagnetic Linear Actuators for Marine Applications
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Influence of addition of calcium sulfate dihydrate on drying of autoclaved aerated concrete
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Analysis of Microstrip Line Fed Patch Antenna for Wireless Communications
  45. Regular Articles
  46. PEMFC for aeronautic applications: A review on the durability aspects
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Laser marking as environment technology
  49. Regular Articles
  50. Influence of grain size distribution on dynamic shear modulus of sands
  51. Regular Articles
  52. Field evaluation of reflective insulation in south east Asia
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Effects of different production technologies on mechanical and metallurgical properties of precious metal denture alloys
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Mathematical description of tooth flank surface of globoidal worm gear with straight axial tooth profile
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Earth-based construction material field tests characterization in the Alto Douro Wine Region
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Experimental and Mathematical Modeling for Prediction of Tool Wear on the Machining of Aluminium 6061 Alloy by High Speed Steel Tools
  61. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  62. 10.1515/eng-2017-0001
  63. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  64. The Methodology of Selecting the Transport Mode for Companies on the Slovak Transport Market
  65. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  66. Determinants of Distribution Logistics in the Construction Industry
  67. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  68. Management of Customer Service in Terms of Logistics Information Systems
  69. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  70. The Use of Simulation Models in Solving the Problems of Merging two Plants of the Company
  71. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  72. Applying the Heuristic to the Risk Assessment within the Automotive Industry Supply Chain
  73. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  74. Modeling the Supply Process Using the Application of Selected Methods of Operational Analysis
  75. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  76. Possibilities of Using Transport Terminals in South Bohemian Region
  77. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  78. Comparison of the Temperature Conditions in the Transport of Perishable Foodstuff
  79. Special Issue on Current Topics, Trends and Applications in Logistics
  80. E-commerce and its Impact on Logistics Requirements
  81. Topical Issue Modern Manufacturing Technologies
  82. Wear-dependent specific coefficients in a mechanistic model for turning of nickel-based superalloy with ceramic tools
  83. Topical Issue Modern Manufacturing Technologies
  84. Effects of cutting parameters on machinability characteristics of Ni-based superalloys: a review
  85. Topical Issue Desktop Grids for High Performance Computing
  86. Task Scheduling in Desktop Grids: Open Problems
  87. Topical Issue Desktop Grids for High Performance Computing
  88. A Volunteer Computing Project for Solving Geoacoustic Inversion Problems
  89. Topical Issue Desktop Grids for High Performance Computing
  90. Improving “tail” computations in a BOINC-based Desktop Grid
  91. Topical Issue Desktop Grids for High Performance Computing
  92. LHC@Home: a BOINC-based volunteer computing infrastructure for physics studies at CERN
  93. Topical Issue Desktop Grids for High Performance Computing
  94. Comparison of Decisions Quality of Heuristic Methods with Limited Depth-First Search Techniques in the Graph Shortest Path Problem
  95. Topical Issue Desktop Grids for High Performance Computing
  96. Using Volunteer Computing to Study Some Features of Diagonal Latin Squares
  97. Topical Issue on Mathematical Modelling in Applied Sciences, II
  98. A polynomial algorithm for packing unit squares in a hypograph of a piecewise linear function
  99. Topical Issue on Mathematical Modelling in Applied Sciences, II
  100. Numerical Validation of Chemical Compositional Model for Wettability Alteration Processes
  101. Topical Issue on Mathematical Modelling in Applied Sciences, II
  102. Innovative intelligent technology of distance learning for visually impaired people
  103. Topical Issue on Mathematical Modelling in Applied Sciences, II
  104. Implementation and verification of global optimization benchmark problems
  105. Topical Issue on Mathematical Modelling in Applied Sciences, II
  106. On a program manifold’s stability of one contour automatic control systems
  107. Topical Issue on Mathematical Modelling in Applied Sciences, II
  108. Multi-agent grid system Agent-GRID with dynamic load balancing of cluster nodes
Heruntergeladen am 15.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/eng-2017-0005/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen