Home Education Integration of Project-Based Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics to Improve Students’ Biology Practical Skills in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
Article Open Access

Integration of Project-Based Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics to Improve Students’ Biology Practical Skills in Higher Education: A Systematic Review

  • Ruth Megawati EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 27, 2024

Abstract

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-integrated project-based learning (PBL) is essential in contemporary education as it improves students’ advanced cognitive capacities, critical thinking aptitude, scientific literacy, and ecological awareness. This study aims to identify and highlight some research publications that examine STEM-integrated PBL to improve students’ biology practical skills in higher education. The author guided the systematic review process with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses diagram, ensuring a structured approach to article selection. The author selected 24 potential articles for the literature review based on certain inclusion criteria. The chosen articles emphasize the importance of evaluating STEM-integrated PBL to improve biology practicum skills among students in higher education, highlighting the need for quantitative methods such as descriptive surveys and experiments in research. The research article’s findings show a positive trend toward improving educational practices in biology through the integration of STEM in PBL, with a growing body of literature focusing on this area. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for educators to improve students’ biology practical skills in higher education.

1 Introduction

Project-based learning (PBL) is an essential component of contemporary education because it helps students become more intelligent, critical thinkers, communicators, and socially adaptive (Wilhelm, Wilhelm, & Cole, 2019). By integrating information from several fields and emphasizing self-education and practical task performance, it replaces traditional authoritarian teaching methods with a student-centered approach (Voloshin & Musiyenko, 2022). Students who participate in PBL not only broaden their horizons but also gain experience in producing and assessing end products, which promotes an innovative and problem-solving culture (Daineko, Yurasova, Karavaeva, & Pechenkina, 2023). In addition to increasing students’ willingness to study and cognitive activity, project-based technology helps educators apply innovative teaching strategies and creates a contemporary environment in which students actively participate in their cognitive growth (Indriyani, Erita, Undari, & Sanjaya, 2022; Osadchiy & Serezhkina, 2020). The approach also improves soft skills through group project work and hard skills through in-depth problem-solving, especially in current education.

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education plays a critical role in current education and helps students prepare for future problems (Petrenko & Kokarieva, 2023). It places a strong emphasis on using multidisciplinary knowledge to address practical issues, encouraging the kind of critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving abilities that are becoming increasingly valuable in the dynamic labor market. Through the use of cutting-edge technologies like robotics and gamification, STEM education not only modernizes methodological ideas and instructional materials but also improves the learning process, making difficult concepts more approachable and engaging for kids from an early age (Pelin & Grigorova, 2022). STEM education gives students the competencies they need to excel in a variety of disciplines, especially in the quickly developing IT industry, by emphasizing practical skills and hands-on experiences. This ensures that students become valued members of society with a solid foundation in science and technology, especially in modern education (Derevyanchuk et al., 2024).

In modern education, STEM-integrated PBL provides students with several advantages. It improves students’ critical thinking, motivation, interest, and capacity for creative and original thought (Lumbantobing, Faradiba, Prabowo, Sianturi, & Guswantoro, 2022). Learning integration is a learning approach that harmoniously integrates several learning approaches to provide students with meaningful learning experiences (Fakhruddin, Bahrudin, & Mujahidin, 2018). STEM-integrated PBL develops creativity and enhances students’ skills in observing, applying, and experimenting by having them design experimental protocols and carry out projects (Sucilestari, Ramdani, Sukarso, Susilawati, & Rokhmat, 2023). Furthermore, this method boosts students’ enthusiasm, inventiveness, and drive for learning, which promotes effective project execution and competency development (Fatin & Sudira, 2023). Students’ perceptions of physics and physics education have improved when using STEM-integrated PBL, suggesting that this is a more successful learning approach than traditional techniques (Uden, Sulaiman, Ching, & Rosales, 2023). STEM-integrated PBL gives students the fundamental information and abilities they need to negotiate the challenges of complex twenty-first-century biology learning successfully.

Previous researchers have specifically studied the integration of STEM-integrated PBL in biology learning (Budiarti, Harlis, & Siburian, 2023). These studies have demonstrated noteworthy advantages in augmenting students’ cognitive proficiencies and personal growth. According to Rahayu & Maryani (2023), researchers have found that using STEM-integrated PBL not only makes students more creative but also helps them learn science. This is clear from the fact that learning outcomes and student creativity changed significantly after the STEM-PBL activity. Research also shows that using digital teaching resources to incorporate local knowledge into STEM-PBL lessons greatly improves students’ science literacy (Muskania, Maksum, & Astra, 2023). This shows how important contextual and interactive learning experiences are for developing well-rounded students (Muskania et al., 2023). Overall, the incorporation of STEM and PBL into biology instruction strengthens students’ character development and scientific literacy while also improving their academic performance and equipping them for difficulties in the workplace and beyond (Hehakaya, Matdoan, & Rumahlatu, 2022). Additionally, as demonstrated by higher N-gain values in experimental classrooms, including STEM-PBL through online learning can greatly enhance students’ critical thinking abilities in biology teaching (Fadhilah, Nurdiyanti, Anisa, & Wajdi, 2022). PBL integrated with STEM effectively improves students’ creative thinking skills in fluid dynamics subjects (Sinurat, Syaiful, & Muhammad, 2022). According to previous research, there appears to be no systematic review that explores and highlights the integration of STEM in PBL to improve biology practicum skills, particularly in higher education. This study aims to identify and highlight some research publications that examine STEM-integrated PBL to improve students’ practical biology skills in higher education. A narrative synthesis approach was chosen to combine the results of all the systematically included studies. The review will address the following research questions (RQ):

  1. What role do PBL and STEM play in learning?

  2. What are the advantages of STEM-integrated PBL in biology education?

  3. How does STEM-integrated PBL improve biology practicum skills in higher education?

2 Method

This research employs a method that includes procedures, analysis, and data synthesis.

2.1 Procedure

The author conducted this study using a systematic literature review (SLR), a process that involves locating, classifying, assessing, and scrutinizing all relevant studies (Tranfield, Denyer, & Smart, 2003; Tusianah et al., 2021). The STEM-integrated PBL enhances biology practicum skills in higher education (Abas, Amin, Ibrohim, & Indriwati, 2024). This method promotes active participation, analytical reasoning, and the practical application of biological principles, resulting in enhanced academic achievement and a more profound comprehension among students. The author uses the Publish or Perish application to search for and harvest articles from the Google Scholar and Scopus databases. The time range for publishing articles is between 2016 and 2023 to produce the latest findings (Figure 1). The keywords used are PBL, STEM education, STEM-integrated PBL, and biology practicum. Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of harvested articles by year. The number of articles published each year increases and reaches its peak in 2023, except for a decline in 2020 and 2021. The results of searching and harvesting articles in the Google Scholar and Scopus databases were 660. The number of articles published from 2016 to 2023 was 52, 61, 74, 93, 89, 82, 97, and 112.

Figure 1 
                  The number of articles published from 2016 to 2023.
Figure 1

The number of articles published from 2016 to 2023.

Articles harvested came from various types of publications, including trade journals, book series, books, conference proceedings, and journals, as illustrated in Figure 2. The second category consists of articles published in conference proceedings, with a total of 130. The number of articles in trade journals, book series, book chapters, and books was 23, 18, 20, and 27, respectively. According to the data, authors prioritize sources for publishing research findings in journals over others.

Figure 2 
                  The number of articles selected based on the sources used.
Figure 2

The number of articles selected based on the sources used.

The following criteria were required for inclusion:

  1. The article discusses how STEM-integrated PBL improves biology practicum skills in higher education.

  2. The subjects of the article are biology students in higher education.

  3. The article uses quantitative methods such as descriptive surveys, experiments, or both.

  4. The article comes from three databases: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, with a digital object identifier (DOI).

  5. The article was published between 2016 and 2023.

  6. The article is in English and Indonesian.

There are several reasons for exclusion criteria, including study design, demographic attributes, and ethical issues in this study. Understanding these factors is important to increase the inclusiveness and relevance of study results. Exclusion criteria include the following:

  1. The article discusses the role of STEM integration in PBL but does not aim to improve biology practicum skills in higher education.

  2. The subjects of the article are not biology students in higher education.

  3. The study does not use quantitative methods such as descriptive surveys, experiments, or a mixture of both.

  4. The article comes from another database and does not have a DOI.

  5. This article appeared before 2016 and after 2023.

  6. This article is available in Chinese, Russian, and other languages.

2.2 Analysis

The author utilizes the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) diagram as a tool and guide to evaluate a systematic review. Also, she uses the PRISMA to identify potential articles (Haddaway, Page, Pritchard, & McGuinness, 2022), which involves three stages: identification, screening, and inclusion (Figure 3).

Figure 3 
                  Utilizing the PRISMA flow diagram to select potential articles.
Figure 3

Utilizing the PRISMA flow diagram to select potential articles.

During the identification step, 59 articles were found to be duplicates, 121 articles did not meet the specified standards, and 67 articles were excluded for various reasons; examples include articles not directly associated with the research topic, abstract-only articles, and publications lacking a peer-review process. As a result, 413 articles successfully passed the identification stage. During the screening step, 127 items were eliminated and 286 articles were obtained. STEM education is critical in current education and helps students prepare for future problems. During the inclusion stage, 24 prospective articles were selected for the literature review stage.

Furthermore, the articles were chosen based on the number of potential articles in each year. Figure 4 displays the total number of publications that were published between the years 2016 and 2023.

Figure 4 
                  Number of potential articles by year.
Figure 4

Number of potential articles by year.

Figure 4 illustrates the distribution of potential articles from 2016 to 2023 as follows: 3, 1, 0, 0, 5, 5, 6, and 4.

2.3 Data Synthesis

Data synthesis was conducted on RQ1, RQ2, and RQ3 to gather the most recent findings. Despite the limited number of studies and the diversity of study designs, a quantitative meta-analysis was not conducted. Instead, a narrative synthesis approach has been opted, which systematically synthesized all findings from the included studies. Twenty-four potential articles were ranked based on RQ, specifically RQ1 with 11 articles, RQ2 with 8 articles, and RQ3 with 5 articles (Figure 5). Twenty-four potential articles were reviewed, including the first author, highlights, results, and research gaps.

Figure 5 
                  Number of publications based on the RQ.
Figure 5

Number of publications based on the RQ.

3 Result and Discussion

A systematic review of STEM-integrated PBL was conducted successfully to improve biology practicum skills in higher education. The STEM-integrated PBL has a positive impact on biology learning, especially in improving biology practicum skills in higher education. This research has successfully addressed all of the previously designed RQs.

3.1 RQ1: What Role Do PBL and STEM Play in Learning?

The incorporation of STEM education has a substantial effect on student performance in mathematics and science, as it enhances learning outcomes, fosters interest in STEM subjects, boosts motivation, and develops higher-order thinking abilities (Abdul-Rahaman & Tindam, 2024). Students have the opportunity to cultivate a profound understanding of disciplines such as graphic design, proficient client communication, and statistical principles through the use of PBL, resulting in enhanced educational achievements (Table 1).

Table 1

The role of PBL and STEM in learning

Author Highlight Result Research gap
Islami and Nikensari (2023) We are currently analyzing the effects of PBL on student learning outcomes The application of PBL in experimental groups can significantly improve student learning outcomes Evaluation of PBL learning methods can improve student learning outcomes as a whole
Dan and Xueyan (2023) The implementation of PBL enhanced students’ enthusiasm for acquiring knowledge. PBL enhanced students’ skills and produced substantial outcomes The implementation of PBL enhanced students’ enthusiasm for learning. PBL enhanced students’ skills and produced substantial outcomes There is still little research on the practical application of PBL in mathematics courses
Wang (2021) PjBL helps students gain an understanding of topics and principles The research findings indicate that PBL can enhance students’ comprehension of learning concepts There is still a lack of research on the application of PBL in learning. We still need to conduct further research on the effectiveness of PBL in understanding concepts
Fajar et al. (2020) PBL intervention resulted in significant increases in conceptual understanding The role of PBL can improve cognitive abilities and learning engagement, as well as the quality of students’ questions and statements We need further research to examine how PBL affects student achievement
Nair, Smritika, and Thomas (2020) PBL teaching promotes relational understanding by engaging students in experiential learning Research findings suggest that a pedagogical approach centered on PBL can enhance students’ understanding of learning experiences To enhance students’ learning experiences, PBL learning must collaborate with other approaches
Holmes and Hwang (2016) PBL can increase critical thinking skills and higher internal motivation Students engaged in PBL demonstrated elevated levels of critical thinking abilities and internal motivation Because the study is exploratory, the generalizability of the findings is limited. There is a need to conduct additional research on the effects of PBL on various demographic groups
Jafarov (2023) STEM is an effective approach to enhancing students’ critical thinking skills Research has suggested and substantiated a well-founded approach to STEM education We need more research on how STEM improves students’ other skills
De Loof, Boeve-de Pauw, and Van Petegem (2022) Integrated STEM education resulted in positive cognitive performance outcomes in mathematics and technical concepts The implementation of integrated STEM education yielded favorable outcomes in terms of both mathematics comprehension and practical application The analysis of the variations in task time across schools is lacking
Zhou (2022) The article highlights the cultivation of students’ holistic skills through STEM instruction Research findings show that STEM integration in learning can improve students’ abilities in conducting experiments, analyzing data, and discussing problems There doesn’t appear to have been much research on the importance of various activities in science education
Mnguni and Mokiwa (2020) The study emphasizes the importance of a global discussion on optimal strategies for online instruction and learning in STEM education The article examines strategies for conducting online instruction and learning in STEM education Teaching and acquiring skills for new technologies using STEM requires extensive research
Kelley and Knowles (2016) STEM plays a crucial role in addressing the environmental and social ramifications of the twenty-first century The study results showed that students lose interest in the subjects when teachers teach science and mathematics separately without applying them in the real world Further researchers can emphasize the need for a conceptual framework in STEM education to guide integration efforts

Research suggests that PBL improves student learning experiences by promoting self-directed learning, enhancing critical thinking abilities, and cultivating skills such as proficient communication, collaborative teamwork, and independent learning (Table 1). According to Dema and Choden (2024) and Hidayat, Fami, Prayudo, and Mu’taz (2023), PBL has a positive effect on academic performance, student involvement, and conceptual comprehension, resulting in a transition toward more participatory and inventive teaching methods (Pudjiarti, Rusdarti, Lintong, & Hamu, 2024). Early scientific education benefits greatly from PBL, as it enhances children’s critical thinking, cooperative skills, engagement, and collaborative abilities by engaging them in real-world problem-solving and interdisciplinary learning. This prepares them effectively for future academic and professional problems (Dongjin & Ashari, 2024). Generally, educators recommend incorporating PBL into the educational curriculum to maximize student capabilities. This approach highlights the significance of continuous professional development for educators to successfully integrate PBL in educational environments (Kadirhanogullari & Kose, 2023).

PBL helps students develop vital competencies for addressing real-life problems by involving them in practical projects that closely resemble genuine scenarios (Kelley & Knowles, 2016). PBL involves students in hands-on activities such as planning, analyzing client needs, conceptualizing, producing, and evaluating, thereby promoting a profound comprehension of disciplines like graphic design and efficient client communication (Kelley & Knowles, 2016). This methodology encourages active engagement in the learning process, improves problem-solving capabilities, and fosters the development of critical thinking, cooperation, and experimenting skills (Alarfaj et al., 2024; Piccolo, Buzzo, Knobel, Gunasekera, & Papathoma, 2023). PBL encourages students’ self-efficacy, motivation, and deep understanding of complex concepts by engaging them in real-world scenarios. These scenarios include tasks like designing a motion graphics project or solving practical engineering problems, such as a crane system. This approach effectively prepares students for the challenges they will face in their future careers and everyday lives (Calabrese & Songer, 2024; Ismail et al., 2023).

STEM education is essential for equipping students with the necessary skills to tackle real-world problems by incorporating multidisciplinary methods and addressing key global concerns (Table 1). STEM education seeks to include students in practical activities that address real-world problems and offer tangible solutions, with the ultimate goal of promoting sustainability and preserving life (August, 2023; Calabrese & Songer, 2024; Nugroho, Juwita, & Febrianti, 2022). The primary goal of the Real STEM initiative is to cultivate interdisciplinary STEM experiences that enhance critical reasoning skills. The STEM professional learning communities achieve this through ongoing professional development and collaboration (Calabrese & Songer, 2024). Incorporating STEM courses into the curriculum not only enables students to identify and actively address relevant problems but also cultivates their enthusiasm for pursuing careers in STEM fields, helping to alleviate the scarcity of skilled workers in these areas (Calabrese & Songer, 2024). STEM education empowers students with the required information, skills, and competencies to effectively address real-world situations by offering genuine learning experiences, encouraging interdisciplinary thinking, and providing resources that foster student autonomy (Dobrin, 2020).

Collaboration is essential in STEM education since it improves communication, nurtures group dynamics, and facilitates a more profound comprehension of scientific subjects. Technologies such as virtual reality and machine learning play a crucial role in STEM education by enabling collaborative processes, connecting learners who are physically apart, and fostering the sharing of collective knowledge (Wang & Shen, 2023). Furthermore, integrating communication skills into STEM courses might equip students with the ability to effectively engage in cross-cultural collaborations within STEM domains, hence enhancing their cultural competence as professionals (Ma & Lucietto, 2024). In addition, pedagogical approaches such as PBL and problem-based instruction offer students the chance to effectively communicate scientific concepts, create scientific posters, and improve their skills outside of the classroom. This contributes to a more holistic learning experience in STEM education (Odell, Dyer, & Klett, 2023). In summary, cooperation in STEM education not only enhances academic achievements but also provides students with vital skills for their personal and professional development, such as practical biology skills.

3.2 RQ2: What are the Advantages of STEM-Integrated PBL in Biology Education?

STEM-integrated PBL models have proven to be successful in enhancing students’ eco-literacy competencies (Odell et al., 2023). This highlights the need to employ new instructional approaches to enhance environmental education and metacognitive skills. Furthermore, higher critical thinking scores and better learning outcomes for biology students demonstrate that combining STEM and PBL is a beneficial way to improve students’ critical thinking skills, which are crucial in today’s world (Table 2).

Table 2

Advantages of STEM-integrated PBL in biology learning

Author Highlight Result Research gap
Rahmania (2021) STEM plays a crucial role in improving biology education to effectively tackle 21st-century issues Integration of basic skills and knowledge with STEM methods enhances biology learning to address 21st-century problems effectively There appears to be a dearth of examples of integrated STEM projects and a lack of discussion about the potential challenges in implementing a STEM approach
Yaki (2022) Implementing an integrated STEM approach improves critical thinking and biology learning abilities There was no discernible disparity in critical thinking abilities between the experimental and control groups before the intervention. Utilizing an integrated STEM strategy proved to be more effective in augmenting critical thinking in biology learning abilities Objective test items can cause a bias toward guessing. The potential influence of human data on study results is a significant concern
Suciari and Suwono (2021) The integration of PBL and STEAM enhances students’ ability The integration of PBL with STEAM enhances students’ ability to effectively communicate and achieve a deep understanding of concepts Proficiency in communication and a thorough understanding of concepts do not meet the required criteria for completeness. There is a lack of research on how to integrate PBL and STEAM in biology education
Lou, Chou, Shih, and Chung (2017) The five stages of STEM-integrated PBL’s essential instructional elements greatly enhance students’ creativity in biology learning By participating in group discussions and problem-solving activities, students gained an understanding of the importance of teamwork and developed their creativity in biology learning during the STEM-integrated PBL activities We need more research to understand how STEM-PBL affects other biology learning skills
Rahim, Nordin, and Samsudin (2022) Integrating STEM with PBL increases interest in genetic ideas and active student participation The introduction of a STEM-PBL module improved and maintained students’ performance in genetics concepts Other courses don’t integrate STEM with PBL
Aprianty, Gani, and Pada (2020) The PBL-STEM paradigm enhances the science process skills and learning outcomes in biology education In biology learning, the PBL-STEM paradigm improved students’ scientific process skills and academic achievements The evaluation of other teaching models is insufficient. There was insufficient exploration of potential obstacles in the execution process
Setyaningsih et al. (2022) PBL-STEM modules have the potential to improve students’ skills for the twenty-first century PBL-STEM modules can improve twenty-first-century students’ skills Specific issues with the application of PBL in the STEM field receive insufficient attention. The sustained efficacy of the PBL-STEM curriculum has not received extensive analysis
Agustin, Sari, Suhadi, and Juwariyah (2023) The PBL-STEM technique significantly improves student performance on plant anatomy tasks In the plant anatomy project, the PBL-STEAM technique improves student achievement. The intervention class demonstrates superior academic performance compared to the regular class Insufficient evaluation of other learning paradigms. There is a limit to the sample size for generalization

STEM-integrated PBL in biology learning offers numerous advantages (Table 2). It enhances collaborative abilities, responsibility, compromise, productive work, communication, and technology skills among students, leading to a holistic understanding of science and learning experiences (Qurratu’ain et al., 2024). The integration of PBL based on STEM principles cultivates valid and practical character building, shaping students’ character while enhancing their academic abilities (Indrasari & Wulandari, 2024). Additionally, STEM-integrated PBL implementation in science learning significantly increases student creativity, demonstrating a positive influence on the learning process (Agustin et al., 2023). Moreover, training activities focusing on STEM-based PBL improve teachers’ knowledge, enabling them to design contextual learning experiences that enhance students’ problem-solving skills and prepare them for the demands of the twenty-first century (Widiyaningsih et al., 2024). Overall, STEM-integrated PBL in biology learning fosters collaboration, critical thinking, experimentation, and problem-solving skills, providing students with hands-on experiences that prepare them for success in the modern workforce (Hehakaya et al., 2022) (Table 2).

STEM-integrated PBL has demonstrated substantial enhancements in students’ ability to solve problems across different educational environments. According to Muskania’s research, combining STEM education with PBL improves twenty-first-century skills such as problem-solving, creative thinking, cooperation, and communication (Muskania et al., 2023). Furthermore, research by Hayuana, Suwono, and Setiowati (2023), Safitri, Chotimah, Hudha, and Rahardjanto (2023) demonstrates that integrating PBL into STEM education enhances students’ problem-solving abilities in scientific disciplines like biology (Hayuana et al., 2023; Safitri et al., 2023). Also, the research by Iwan, Sumitro, Ibrohim, and Rohman (2024), Najib, Sari, Hastuti, and Balqis (2023) shows that STEM-integrated PBL can help students get better at solving problems in biology classes by using electronic modules and local knowledge, respectively (Iwan et al., 2024; Najib et al., 2023). Hence, the use of STEM-focused PBL methods in biology instruction might effectively improve students’ ability to solve problems, equipping them for upcoming challenges in the discipline.

STEM-integrated PBL has a notable influence on student engagement in biology by improving their motivation, scientific literacy abilities, and overall learning outcomes (Nurhayati et al., 2023). Combining technology with PBL methods in STEM disciplines exposes students to interactive and real-world learning experiences, better preparing them for the demands of the job market (Muskania et al., 2023). Studies have demonstrated that STEM-PBL learning models are successful in enhancing students’ science literacy, highlighting a significant disparity in science literacy between the groups that underwent the experimental model and those in the control group (McKinney, 2023). Incorporating STEM-integrated PBL in biology teaching enhances students’ comprehension of the subject matter by providing them with real-life experiences, which in turn promotes critical thinking, experimentation, teamwork, and problem-solving abilities (Smith et al., 2022). Ismail et al. (2023) also say that the PBL-STEAM integrated strategy makes a big difference in how well students do on tasks related to plant anatomy structure models compared to traditional PBL approaches. This results in higher achievement levels.

One of the challenges encountered is the inability to effectively integrate STEM and PBL into biology education. These challenges include the scarcity of media, tools, and teaching aids (Agustin et al., 2023; Yusuf, 2023). Furthermore, using E-Student worksheets for STEM-based PBL students has the potential to foster character development and academic abilities (Budiarti et al., 2023). However, the integration of STEAM into the PBL learning model has a significant impact on cognitive learning outcomes and creative thinking. However, this may have only a small impact on digital literacy among secondary school students (Hehakaya et al., 2022). These barriers emphasize the importance of overcoming resource constraints, enhancing collaborative capabilities, and efficiently combining local knowledge to optimize the advantages of STEM-integrated PBL in biology education.

3.3 RQ3: How does STEM-Integrated PBL Improve Biology Practicum Skills in Higher Education?

Research has demonstrated that incorporating PBL into STEM can improve practical abilities in biology among students in higher education. Studies have shown that combining STEM with PBL leads to notable enhancements in students’ cognitive learning outcomes, creative thinking abilities, and critical thinking abilities (Table 3).

Table 3

STEM-integrated PBL improves biology practicum skills in higher education

Author Highlight Result Research gap
Lumbantobing et al. (2022) The study highlights the beneficial effects of incorporating STEM-integrated PBL on students’ motivation, comprehension of the subject matter, and problem-solving skills in the biology practicum Integrating PBL with STEM has a beneficial and substantial impact on enhancing students’ science process skills in the biology practicum. This approach, characterized by active participation and cooperation, cultivates a more profound comprehension of scientific principles and enhances the acquisition of critical skills for both academic and real-life achievements Identifying research gaps in future studies could help develop a more thorough understanding of the potential benefits of integrating PBL with STEM education
Marjanah, Pandia, and Nursamsu (2021) STEM-integrated PBL in the biology practicum module can improve students’ scientific process skills by 0.63% The practical biology module’s STEM-integrated PBL received a validity rating of 87.5%, and students’ scientific process skills improved by 0.63% We need to develop STEM-integrated PBL in the practical biology module to enhance students’ problem-solving abilities
Hehakaya et al. (2022) The integration of STEAM and PBL improves cognitive learning. I have developed my creative thinking skills in the biology practicum Implementing PBL in STEAM education significantly improves cognitive learning and significantly boosts creative thinking in the biology practicum. There was no discernible impact on students’ digital literacy Integrated learning approaches have a minimal impact on digital literacy. There are opportunities for further research to improve digital literacy outcomes
Hindriana (2016) The use of STEM and PBL models improved students’ critical thinking skills in the ecology practicum Students demonstrated deficits in critical thinking skills during their ecology practicum. The results suggest a significant need for substantial intervention to improve skills The results indicate a significant need for substantial intervention to enhance students’ proficiency in the ecology practicum procedure
Ramadhan and Suyanto (2020) The study underscores the importance of experiential learning opportunities, like laboratory activities, in boosting students’ academic performance in their biology practicum We organize and execute the biology laboratory exercises effectively. The student learning outcomes exceeded the minimum threshold for completeness The lack of practical training opportunities is due to inadequate facilities and infrastructure. The practical training process is inefficient and lacks adequate evaluation

Biology labs refer to hands-on, experiential learning in the biological sciences, where students engage in laboratory work, field studies, and practical applications of biological concepts. This approach enhances understanding through direct interaction with biological materials and processes. According to Trang, Na, Lanh, and Mai (2021), establishing concepts and cultivating practical skills in biology education is essential to enhance students’ competence and problem-solving abilities. Activity-based methodology in practical work fosters critical thinking and analytical skills, which are essential to address the challenges of contemporary society (Moskalenko & Mironets, 2024). Practical lessons enhance research skills in biology students, as evidenced by increased retention of knowledge and its application in a laboratory setting (Mammadova, 2024). STEM-integrated PBL has the potential to enhance the success of biology laboratories (Markowetz, 2017). PBL to STEM greatly improves the results of the biology practicum by improving students’ scientific process skills, scientific literacy, and creative thinking (Table 3). Similar research shows that STEM-based PBL e-Worksheets for character building in microbiology learning are highly valid and practical, positively impacting students’ academic abilities (Budiarti et al., 2023).

STEM-integrated PBL has demonstrated considerable promise in improving the practical application of biology teaching in real-world contexts. Research has shown that combining STEM with PBL has a beneficial effect on cognitive learning outcomes, creative thinking abilities, and scientific literacy (Purwati, Indiati, & Savira, 2024; Putri, Oktavia, & Azzahra, 2024). Other studies by Salmah, Susanto, and Suwono (2023), Yaki (2022) have supported this. Integrating STEM disciplines with PBL not only enhances students’ comprehension of scientific concepts but also cultivates practical skills through experiential projects and interdisciplinary methods (Odell et al., 2023). Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that developing electronic worksheets focused on STEM for PBL enhances the development of character traits and boosts academic skills in the field of practicum microbiology. This suggests that combining technology with PBL is an effective way to create engaging and relevant learning experiences (Salmah et al., 2023). As a result, the inclusion of STEM-integrated PBL can effectively enhance the practical implementation of biology concepts by fostering a comprehensive approach to science education that is in line with the skills required in the twenty-first century.

The incorporation of STEM-integrated PBL markedly improves the cultivation of practical implementation abilities in higher education students. This methodology promotes participation, critical analysis, and collaboration, which are vital for practical applications in biology and other STEM disciplines. PBL has demonstrated enhancements in academic performance and student engagement within STEM fields, resulting in increased interest in subjects such as biology practicum (Hasbullah, 2023). The acquisition of biology practicum skills in higher education is essential for improving students’ learning outcomes and research capabilities. Studies have shown that including biology practicum activities can have a substantial positive impact on students’ ability to think critically and their overall academic achievements (Alfaraby & Sipahutar, 2023). Moreover, the acquisition of essential practical skills, such as pipetting, data manipulation, and experimental planning, is crucial in bioscience programs, especially in difficult circumstances (Rayment et al., 2022). Research also indicates that individuals pursuing a biology education major have a satisfactory level of science process skills, highlighting the significance of hands-on activities in developing students’ abilities (Anita, 2022). Furthermore, studies emphasize the importance of practical skills gained during high school practicum in supporting seamless transitions to practical work in higher education, underscoring the advantages of early exposure to hands-on experiences in the field of biology (Lestari & Handayani, 2021).

4 Conclusion

Research has shown that integrating STEM education with PBL significantly enhances biology practicum skills among higher education students. This approach not only improves students’ understanding of biological concepts but also fosters essential skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving, which are vital in today’s dynamic labor market. The SLR identified 24 relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria, highlighting the positive impact of STEM-integrated PBL on students’ academic performance and engagement in biology learning. The findings suggest that this educational strategy effectively prepares students for future challenges by promoting a deeper understanding of interdisciplinary knowledge and practical applications. Despite the promising results, the research also pointed out challenges in implementing STEM-integrated PBL, such as resource limitations and the need for effective integration of local knowledge. Addressing these challenges is crucial for maximizing the benefits of this educational approach. Overall, the article concludes that adopting STEM-integrated PBL in biology education can lead to improved learning outcomes and better prepare students for their future careers. We recommend continuous professional development for educators and the incorporation of innovative teaching methods to enhance the effectiveness of this approach. Future research should focus on exploring the long-term effects of STEM-integrated PBL on students’ career readiness and the potential for scaling this approach across different educational contexts.

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank the Head of Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Cenderawasih University, Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia, for allowing us to conduct this research.

  1. Funding information: The author states no funding involved.

  2. Author contributions: The author confirms the sole responsibility for the conception of the study, presented results, and manuscript preparation.

  3. Conflict of interest: The author states no conflict of interest.

References

Abas, A., Amin, M., Ibrohim, I., & Indriwati, S. E. (2024). Integration of project-based learning to improve scientific process skills and conceptual understanding in the learning process of invertebrate zoology. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 10(2), 486–496. doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v10i2.34305.Search in Google Scholar

Abdul-Rahaman, A., & Tindam, T. N. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education on students’ achievement in secondary schools. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(2), 114–120. doi: 10.59652/jetm.v2i2.179.Search in Google Scholar

Agustin, W., Sari, M. S., Suhadi, S., & Juwariyah, S. (2023). Developing a biology E-module based on Pjbl-steam model to improve students’ collaboration skills. Bioedukasi, 21(2), 117–127. doi: 10.19184/bioedu.v21i2.39621.Search in Google Scholar

Alarfaj, M., Mohamed, S. M., Chtourou, S., Enshasy, H., Aboulnaga, A., & Hassan, M. (2024). Experience of project-based learning: Challenges, assessment, and analysis. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 14(3), 123–139. doi: 10.3991/ijep.v14i3.43849.Search in Google Scholar

Alfaraby, M., & Sipahutar, H. (2023). Analysis of the implementation of biology practicum and its relationship with student higher order thinking skills and learning outcomes. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 11(3), 85–91. doi: 10.24114/jpp.v11i3.44711.Search in Google Scholar

Anita, H. (2022). Analisis keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada kegiatan praktikum mikrobiologi. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 3(2), 240–249. doi: 10.37478/jpm.v3i2.1765.Search in Google Scholar

Aprianty, H., Gani, A., & Pada, A. U. T. (2020). Implementation of project-based learning through stem approach to improve students’ science process skills and learning outcomes. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 5(2), 144–152. doi: 10.15575/jtk.v5i2.8370.Search in Google Scholar

August, L. A. (2023). Integrating STEM curriculum across the schools’ learning environment to reflect & impact life practices. KnE Social Sciences. 2023, 273–285. doi: 10.18502/kss.v8i20.14608.Search in Google Scholar

Budiarti, R. S., Harlis, & Siburian, J. (2023). Development of STEM-based PjBL E-student worksheet to foster character building. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9818–9828. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.6169.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, J. E., & Songer, B. N. (2024). Youths’ solutions to local invasive species. Open Access Government, 41(1), 272–273. doi: 10.56367/OAG-041-10836.Search in Google Scholar

Daineko, L. V., Yurasova, I. I., Karavaeva, N. M., & Pechenkina, T. E. (2023). Project-based learning in higher education as a tool for integrated hard, soft skills and engineering language development. In D. Bylieva & A. Nordmann (Eds.), Technologies in a multilingual environment (Vol. 636, pp. 506–517). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-26783-3_41.Search in Google Scholar

Dan, W., & Xueyan, D. (2023). Exploration of the practice of project-based learning in the field of mathematics for primary school students. Education Research and Development, 2(2), 28–32. doi: 10.57237/j.edu.2023.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2022). Integrated STEM education: The effects of a long-term intervention on students’ cognitive performance. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–17. doi: 10.20897/ejsteme/12738.Search in Google Scholar

Dema, C., & Choden, U. (2024). Impact of project-based learning on computer science education. Educational Innovation and Practice, 7(1), 1–27. doi: 10.17102/eip.7.2024.08.Search in Google Scholar

Derevyanchuk, O. V., Kovalchuk, V., Kramar, V., Kravchenko, H., Kondryuk, D., Kovalchuk, A., & Onufriichuk, B. (2024). Implementation of STEM education in the process of training of future specialists of engineering and pedagogical specialties. In O. V. Angelsky & C. Yu. Zenkova (Eds.), Sixteenth International Conference on Correlation Optics (p. 55). SPIE. doi: 10.1117/12.3012996.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrin, J. (2020). Learning for the real world: Interdisciplinary challenge projects to facilitate real-world learning in STEM. In V. L. Akerson & G. A. Buck (Eds.), Critical questions in STEM education (Vol. 51, pp. 129–146). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-57646-2_8.Search in Google Scholar

Dongjin, S., & Ashari, M, Z. B. (2024). Project-based learning in early science education a systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(2), 706–721. doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i2/21365.Search in Google Scholar

Fadhilah, N., Nurdiyanti, N., Anisa, A., & Wajdi, M. (2022). Integrasi STEM-problem based learning melalui daring terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa pendidikan biologi. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 1–10. doi: 10.24815/jipi.v6i1.22721.Search in Google Scholar

Fajar, D. M., Ramli, M., Ariyanto, J., Widoretno, S., Sajidan, S., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2020). Enhancing students’ thinking skills through project-based learning in biology. Biosfer, 13(2), 230–249. doi: 10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n2.230-249.Search in Google Scholar

Fakhruddin, U., Bahrudin, E., & Mujahidin, E. (2018). Konsep integrasi dalam sistem pembelajaran mata pelajaran umum di pesantren. Ta’dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 214. doi: 10.32832/tadibuna.v7i2.1394.Search in Google Scholar

Fatin, N. N., & Sudira, P. (2023). The integrated PjBL with STEM approach in the EV-green electric car project. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2671(1), 050020. doi: 10.1063/5.0114405.Search in Google Scholar

Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimized digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230.Search in Google Scholar

Hasbullah. (2023). From theory to practice: A comprehensive examination of implementing project-based learning in STEM curricula. IJGIE (International Journal of Graduate of Islamic Education), 4(2), 362–373. doi: 10.37567/ijgie.v4i2.2566.Search in Google Scholar

Hayuana, W., Suwono, H., & Setiowati, F. K. (2023). Effectiveness of PBL STEM to improve problem-solving skills. Bioedukasi, 21(2), 144–151. doi: 10.19184/bioedu.v21i2.39740.Search in Google Scholar

Hehakaya, W., Matdoan, M. N., & Rumahlatu, D. (2022). Integrating STEAM with PjBL and PBL on biology education: Improving students’ cognitive learning results, creative thinking, and digital literacy. Biosfer, 15(1), 76–84. doi: 10.21009/biosferjpb.24468.Search in Google Scholar

Hidayat, D. V., Fami, A., Prayudo, G. A., & Mu’taz, F. A. (2023). Project based learning: Pembuatan motion graphics “Affordable” untuk Klien LB LIA. Jurnal Mahasiswa Kreatif, 2(1), 80–89. doi: 10.59581/jmk-widyakarya.v2i1.2246.Search in Google Scholar

Hindriana, A. F. (2016). The development of biology practicum learning based on vee diagram for reducing student cognitive load. JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning), 1(2), 61–65. doi: 10.26737/jetl.v1i2.39.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, V. L., & Hwang, Y. (2016). Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 449–463. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.979911.Search in Google Scholar

Indrasari, A., & Wulandari, F. E. (2024). STEM PjBL sparks global ecoliteracy advancement: STEM PjBL Memicu Kemajuan Ekoliterasi Global. Indonesian Journal of Education Methods Development, 19(2), 5–16. doi: 10.21070/ijemd.v19i2.824.Search in Google Scholar

Indriyani, N., Erita, Y., Undari, M., & Sanjaya, W. (2022). Comparison of civics and social studies learning design models in various countries at the elementary school level. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 1(7), 258–269. doi: 10.56778/jdlde.v1i7.44.Search in Google Scholar

Islami, V., & Nikensari, S. I. (2023). Analysis of project-based blended learning in statistics learning in higher education. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 4(3), 1937–1947. doi: 10.54373/imeij.v4i3.453.Search in Google Scholar

Ismail, F. S., Subha, N. A. M., Ghazali, N. E., Mohamed, Z., Sudin, S., Hassan, F., … Wahid, H. (2023). Crafting a Real-World Problem Project-Based Learning Based on the Gantry Crane System. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 34(1), 228–237. doi: 10.37934/araset.34.1.228237.Search in Google Scholar

Iwan, I., Sumitro, S. B., Ibrohim, I., & Rohman, F. (2024). The effect of PBL integrated with Igya Ser Hanjob’s local wisdom to improve students’ problem-solving skills in conservation biology courses. Jurnal Eduscience, 11(1), 20–32. doi: 10.36987/jes.v11i1.5537.Search in Google Scholar

Jafarov, S. (2023). The role of stem education in preparing students for the workforce. Migration Letters, 20(6), 429–439. doi: 10.59670/ml.v20i6.3495.Search in Google Scholar

Kadirhanogullari, K. M., & Kose, O. E. (2023). Project-based learning in science education: A bibliometric network analysis. International Journal on Studies in Education, 6(1), 85–108. doi: 10.46328/ijonse.200.Search in Google Scholar

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.Search in Google Scholar

Lestari, T. A., & Handayani, B. S. (2021). Analysis of practicum skills for private high school alumni in Bandung City in higher education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(3), 388–394. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v7i3.723.Search in Google Scholar

Lou, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Shih, R. C., & Chung, C. C. (2017). A study of creativity in CaC2 steamship-derived STEM project-based learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.01231a.Search in Google Scholar

Lumbantobing, S. S., Faradiba, F., Prabowo, D. J., Sianturi, M., & Guswantoro, T. (2022). The effect of project-based learning integrated STEM to increase science process skill. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 8(2), 299–305. doi: 10.29303/jpft.v8i2.4439.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, T., & Lucietto, A. M. (2024). Cross-cultural communication across STEM disciplines. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1373558. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1373558.Search in Google Scholar

Mammadova, K. (2024). Practical knowledge and skills to be imparted to students in extracurricular activities in biology in secondary schools. Scientific Collection InterConf, 45(201), 194–196. doi: 10.51582/interconf.19-20.05.2024.018.Search in Google Scholar

Marjanah, M., Pandia, E., & Nursamsu, N. (2021). Development of practicum instruction module based on project based learning (PjBL) integrated with science process skills and scientific literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(SpecialIssue), 104–111. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.874.Search in Google Scholar

Markowetz, F. (2017). All biology is computational biology. PLOS Biology, 15(3), e2002050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002050.Search in Google Scholar

McKinney, L. (2023). Effectiveness of project-based learning in a junior high science classroom. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 19(3), 2–37. doi: 10.29333/ijese/13678.Search in Google Scholar

Mnguni, L., & Mokiwa, H. (2020). The integration of online teaching and learning in STEM education as a response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6A), 1040–1042. doi: 10.33225/jbse/20.19.1040.Search in Google Scholar

Moskalenko, M., & Mironets, L. (2024). Пpaктичні poбoти як зacіб peaлізaції діяльніcнoгo підxoдy під чac нaвчaння біoлoгії в cтapшій шкoлі нa пpoфільнoмy pівні. Scientific Notes of Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University Section Theory and Methods of Teaching Natural Sciences, 6, 9–16. doi: 10.31652/2786-5754-2024-6-9-16.Search in Google Scholar

Muskania, R. T., Maksum, A., & Astra, I. M. (2023). STEM-PjBL learning incorporates local knowledge to improve science literacy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 18(2), 522–532. doi: 10.18844/cjes.v18i2.8791.Search in Google Scholar

Nair, S. S., Smritika, S. P., & Thomas, K. A. (2020). Revitalizing education through problem-based learning practices. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(1), 109–117. doi: 10.34293/education.v9i1.3436.Search in Google Scholar

Najib, I. A., Sari, M. S., Hastuti, U. S., & Balqis, B. (2023). Development of PBL-based lichens diversity e-module to improve students’ problem-solving skills. Edubiotik: Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 8(2), 106–117. doi: 10.33503/ebio.v8i02.3465.Search in Google Scholar

Nugroho, O. F., Juwita, S. R., & Febrianti, N. (2022). STEM education planning based on contextual issues sustainable development goals (SDGs). Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(2), 159–168. doi: 10.55215/pedagonal.v6i2.5554.Search in Google Scholar

Nurhayati, B., Jamaluddin, F. J., Daud, F., Saenab, S., Hadis, A., & Hadis, N. I. R. (2023). An extraordinary duet: Integration of PjBL and STEM to promote student’s motivation, scientific literacy skills, and student’s learning outcomes. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(3), 42–47. doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.639.Search in Google Scholar

Odell, M. R. L., Dyer, K., & Klett, M. D. (2023). Collaboration and communication in science and technology education. In B. Akpan, B. Cavas, & T. Kennedy (Eds.), Contemporary issues in science and technology education (Vol. 56, pp. 283–294). Springer Nature Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-24259-5_20.Search in Google Scholar

Osadchiy, I. S., & Serezhkina, A. E. (2020). Project-based education as a cross-functional competencies development approach. In V. A. Burdin, V. A. Andreev, O. G. Morozov, A. V. Bourdine, & A. H. Sultanov (Eds.), Optical technologies for telecommunications 2019 (p. 34). Kazan, Russian Federation: SPIE. doi: 10.1117/12.2566358.Search in Google Scholar

Pelin, E., & Grigorova, I. (2022). STEM in the classroom the role of technology and gamification as part of the educational process. Vocational Education, 24(4), 397–411. doi: 10.53656/voc22-452stem.Search in Google Scholar

Petrenko, L., & Kokarieva, N. (2023). Features of the stem-education formation: Foreign experience. Pedagogical Sciences, 81(9), 140–147. doi: 10.33989/2524-2474.2023.81.289407.Search in Google Scholar

Piccolo, L., Buzzo, D., Knobel, M., Gunasekera, P., & Papathoma, T. (2023). Interaction design as project-based learning: Perspectives for unsolved challenges. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Symposium on HCI Education (pp. 59–67). doi: 10.1145/3587399.3587462.Search in Google Scholar

Pudjiarti, E. S., Rusdarti, Lintong, M. M., & Hamu, F. J. (2024). The power of project-based learning: A catalyst for student engagement, collaboration, and academic excellence. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(3), 606–621. doi: 10.18488/61.v12i3.3735.Search in Google Scholar

Purwati, H., Indiati, I., & Savira, A. M. (2024). The influence of STEM: Integrated PjBL learning models on students’ mathematical creative thinking abilities examined from a metacognitive perspective. KnE Social Sciences, 528–540. doi: 10.18502/kss.v9i6.15302.Search in Google Scholar

Putri, R. E. G. M., Oktavia, R., & Azzahra, F. (2024). The effect of PJBL-stem learning model on students’ cognitive skill in matter substances and their changes subject. ISER (Indonesian Science Education Research), 6(1), 42–45. doi: 10.24114/iser.v6i1.62189.Search in Google Scholar

Qurratu’ain, B. S., Ning Tias, E. P. A., Wicaksono, M. G., Widiyaningsih, T., Meilyani, S., Andika, M. R., & Setyaningsih, E. (2024). Classroom students collaborative abilities XII SMA Negeri 5 Surakarta in learning biotechnology PJBL integrated STEM teaching year 2023/2024. Proceeding of International Interdisciplinary Conference And Research Expo, 1(1), 12–22. doi: 10.18326/iicare.v1i1.625.Search in Google Scholar

Rahayu, A. S., & Maryani, I. (2023). STEM-PjBL and creativity of science learning students in elementary schools. Journal of Professional Teacher Education, 1(2), 72–83. doi: 10.12928/jprotect.v1i2.640.Search in Google Scholar

Rahim, S. P. A., Nordin, N., & Samsudin, M. A. (2022). Integrated stem problem-based learning approach: A study on Malaysian undergraduates’ achievement in learning genetics concepts. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 7(48), 27–39. doi: 10.35631/IJEPC.748003.Search in Google Scholar

Rahmania, I. (2021). Project based learning (PjBL) learning model with STEM approach in natural science learning for the 21st century. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 1161–1167. doi: 10.33258/birci.v4i1.1727.Search in Google Scholar

Ramadhan, T., & Suyanto, S. (2020). Biology science practicum learning: An evaluation study in junior high school of Ngemplak-Indonesia. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(3), 361–366. doi: 10.22219/jpbi.v6i3.13657.Search in Google Scholar

Rayment, S., Garrie, K., Kaur, I., McVicker, G., Storey, E., Winter, J., … Dale, J. (2022). Investigating student engagement and making science real during a pandemic: Bioskills at home, a case study. Education Sciences, 12(2), 2–19. doi: 10.3390/educsci12020106.Search in Google Scholar

Safitri, A., Chotimah, H., Hudha, A. M., & Rahardjanto, A. (2023). Application of problem-based learning to improve problem-solving skills and creative thinking skills of class XI students. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 7(2), 157–170. doi: 10.24036/jep/vol7-iss2/757.Search in Google Scholar

Salmah, H., Susanto, H., & Suwono, H. (2023). Web-based learning integrated with PBL in biology learning to encourage self-regulated learning in senior high school. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569, 020027. doi: 10.1063/5.0113561.Search in Google Scholar

Setyaningsih, E., Agustina, P., Anif, S., Ahmad, C. N. C., Sofyan, I., Saputra, A., … Hidayat, M. L. (2022). PBL-STEM modul feasibility test for preservice biology teacher. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 4(2), 118–127. doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.15980.Search in Google Scholar

Sinurat, H. A. Y., Syaiful, S., & Muhammad, D. (2022). The implementation of integrated project-based learning science technology engineering mathematics on creative thinking skills and student cognitive learning outcomes in dynamic fluid. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 83–94. doi: 10.21009/1.08108.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., … Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. doi: 10.3390/educsci12100728.Search in Google Scholar

Suciari, N. K. D., & Suwono, H. (2021). The impact of PjBL integrated STEAM on students’ communication skills and concept mastery in high school biology learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330–2337. doi: 10.1063/5.0043395.Search in Google Scholar

Sucilestari, R., Ramdani, A., Sukarso, A., Susilawati, S., & Rokhmat, J. (2023). Project-based learning supports students’ creative thinking in science education. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 1038–1044. doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5054.Search in Google Scholar

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge through systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.Search in Google Scholar

Trang, L. T. T., Na, N. T., Lanh, H. T., & Mai, V. H. (2021). Research on build exercises that integrate knowledge to solve practical problems in teaching high school students. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Educational Study, 2(2), 9–14. doi: 10.47616/jamres.v2i2.164.Search in Google Scholar

Tusianah, R., Sutarsyah, C., Sukirlan, M., Ridwan, R., Nurmalisa, Y., Isnainy, U. C., … Puja Kesuma, T. A. R. (2021). An integrative review of self-efficacy: What factors enhance and impair it? Wseas Transactions on Business and Economics, 18, 1057–1072. doi: 10.37394/23207.2021.18.100.Search in Google Scholar

Uden, L., Sulaiman, F., Ching, G. S., & Rosales, J. J. (2023). Integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics project-based learning for physics learning from neuroscience perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1136246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136246.Search in Google Scholar

Voloshin, O. R., & Musiyenko, O. V. (2022). Using a project-based learning method in health lessons. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 15. Scientific and Pedagogical Problems of Physical Culture (Physical Culture and Sports), 1(145), 34–38. doi: 10.31392/NPU-nc.series15.2022.1(145).09.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, C., & Shen, J. (2023). Technology-enhanced collaborative learning in STEM. In International encyclopedia of education (Fourth Edition) (pp. 207–214). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.13005-2.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, C. C. (2021). The process of implementing problem-based learning in a teacher education program: An exploratory case study. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1996870. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2021.1996870.Search in Google Scholar

Widiyaningsih, T., Ning Tias, E. P. A., Wicaksono, M. G., Qurratu’ain, B. S., Meilyani, S., Andika, M. R., & Setyaningsih, E. (2024). Critical thinking skills in STEM integrated PJBL learning with biotechnology material class XII IPA SMAN 5 Surakarta TA 2023/2024. Proceeding of International Interdisciplinary Conference and Research Expo, 1(1), 32–42. doi: 10.18326/iicare.v1i1.626.Search in Google Scholar

Wilhelm, J., Wilhelm, R., & Cole, M. (2019). A historical perspective on project-based instruction origination, design, and evolution. In J. Wilhelm, R. Wilhelm, & M. Cole (Eds.), Creating project-based STEM environments (pp. 7–20). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04952-2_2.Search in Google Scholar

Yaki, A. A. (2022). Fostering critical thinking skills using integrated STEM approach among secondary school biology students. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–10. doi: 10.20897/ejsteme/12481.Search in Google Scholar

Yusuf, M. (2023). GPT chat with project-based learning in learning: A review. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 2(5), 630–636. doi: 10.56778/jdlde.v2i5.257.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Y. (2022). Integrate STEM education into biology teaching. 2022 3rd International Conference on Mental Health, Education and Human Development (MHEHD 2022). Dalian, China. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220704.066.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-08-03
Revised: 2024-10-28
Accepted: 2024-11-01
Published Online: 2024-11-27

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Issue: Building Bridges in STEAM Education in the 21st Century - Part II
  2. The Flipped Classroom Optimized Through Gamification and Team-Based Learning
  3. Method and New Doctorate Graduates in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics of the European Innovation Scoreboard as a Measure of Innovation Management in Subdisciplines of Management and Quality Studies
  4. Impact of Gamified Problem Sheets in Seppo on Self-Regulation Skills
  5. Special Issue: Disruptive Innovations in Education - Part I
  6. School-Based Education Program to Solve Bullying Cases in Primary Schools
  7. The Project Trauma-Informed Practice for Workers in Public Service Settings: New Strategies for the Same Old Objective
  8. Regular Articles
  9. Limits of Metacognitive Prompts for Confidence Judgments in an Interactive Learning Environment
  10. “Why are These Problems Still Unresolved?” Those Pending Problems, and Neglected Contradictions in Online Classroom in the Post-COVID-19 Era
  11. Potential Elitism in Selection to Bilingual Studies: A Case Study in Higher Education
  12. Predicting Time to Graduation of Open University Students: An Educational Data Mining Study
  13. Risks in Identifying Gifted Students in Mathematics: Case Studies
  14. Technology Integration in Teacher Education Practices in Two Southern African Universities
  15. Comparing Emergency Remote Learning with Traditional Learning in Primary Education: Primary School Student Perspectives
  16. Pedagogical Technologies and Cognitive Development in Secondary Education
  17. Sense of Belonging as a Predictor of Intentions to Drop Out Among Black and White Distance Learning Students at a South African University
  18. Gender Sensitivity of Teacher Education Curricula in the Republic of Croatia
  19. A Case Study of Biology Teaching Practices in Croatian Primary Schools
  20. The Impact of “Scratch” on Student Engagement and Academic Performance in Primary Schools
  21. Examining the Structural Relationships Between Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Intention to Teach and Perceptions of the Nature of Science and Attitudes
  22. Validation of the Undesirable Behavior Strategies Questionnaire: Physical Educators’ Strategies within the Classroom Ecology
  23. Economics Education, Decision-Making, and Entrepreneurial Intention: A Mediation Analysis of Financial Literacy
  24. Deconstructing Teacher Engagement Techniques for Pre-service Teachers through Explicitly Teaching and Applying “Noticing” in Video Observations
  25. Influencing Factors of Work–Life Balance Among Female Managers in Chinese Higher Education Institutions: A Delphi Study
  26. Examining the Interrelationships Among Curiosity, Creativity, and Academic Motivation Using Students in High Schools: A Multivariate Analysis Approach
  27. Teaching Research Methodologies in Education: Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices in Portugal
  28. Normrank Correlations for Testing Associations and for Use in Latent Variable Models
  29. The More, the Merrier; the More Ideas, the Better Feeling”: Examining the Role of Creativity in Regulating Emotions among EFL Teachers
  30. Principals’ Demographic Qualities and the Misuse of School Material Capital in Secondary Schools
  31. Enhancing DevOps Engineering Education Through System-Based Learning Approach
  32. Uncertain Causality Analysis of Critical Success Factors of Special Education Mathematics Teaching
  33. Novel Totto-Chan by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi: A Study of Philosophy of Progressivism and Humanism and Relevance to the Merdeka Curriculum in Indonesia
  34. Global Education and Critical Thinking: A Necessary Symbiosis to Educate for Critical Global Citizenship
  35. The Mediating Effect of Optimism and Resourcefulness on the Relationship between Hardiness and Cyber Delinquent Among Adolescent Students
  36. Enhancing Social Skills Development in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Evaluation of the “Power of Camp Inclusion” Program
  37. The Influence of Student Learning, Student Expectation and Quality of Instructor on Student Perceived Satisfaction and Student Academic Performance: Under Online, Hybrid and Physical Classrooms
  38. Household Size and Access to Education in Rural Burundi: The Case of Mutaho Commune
  39. The Impact of the Madrasati Platform Experience on Acquiring Mathematical Concepts and Improving Learning Motivation from the Point of View of Mathematics Teachers
  40. The Ideal Path: Acquiring Education and Gaining Respect for Parents from the Perspective of Arab-Bedouin Students
  41. Exploring Mentor Teachers’ Experiences and Practices in Japan: Formative Intervention for Self-Directed Development of Novice Teachers
  42. Research Trends and Patterns on Emotional Intelligence in Education: A Bibliometric and Knowledge Mapping During 2012–2021
  43. Openness to Change and Academic Freedom in Jordanian Universities
  44. Digital Methods to Promote Inclusive and Effective Learning in Schools: A Mixed Methods Research Study
  45. Translation Competence in Translator Training Programs at Saudi Universities: Empirical Study
  46. Self-directed Learning Behavior among Communication Arts Students in a HyFlex Learning Environment at a Government University in Thailand
  47. Unveiling Connections between Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and Delinquency Proneness: Analysing the General Strain Theory
  48. The Expression of Gratitude in English and Arabic Doctoral Dissertation Acknowledgements
  49. Subtexts of Most Read Articles on Social Sciences Citation Index: Trends in Educational Issues
  50. Experiences of Adult Learners Engaged in Blended Learning beyond COVID-19 in Ghana
  51. The Influence of STEM-Based Digital Learning on 6C Skills of Elementary School Students
  52. Gender and Family Stereotypes in a Photograph: Research Using the Eye-Tracking Method
  53. ChatGPT in Teaching Linear Algebra: Strides Forward, Steps to Go
  54. Partnership Quality, Student’s Satisfaction, and Loyalty: A Study at Higher Education Legal Entities in Indonesia
  55. SEA’s Science Teacher Voices Through the Modified World Café
  56. Construction of Entrepreneurship Coaching Index: Based on a Survey of Art Design Students in Higher Vocational Colleges in Guangdong, China
  57. The Effect of Audio-Assisted Reading on Incidental Learning of Present Perfect by EFL Learners
  58. Comprehensive Approach to Training English Communicative Competence in Chemistry
  59. The Collaboration of Teaching at The Right Level Approach with Problem-Based Learning Model
  60. Effectiveness of a Pop-Up Story-Based Program for Developing Environmental Awareness and Sustainability Concepts among First-Grade Elementary Students
  61. Effect of Computer Simulation Integrated with Jigsaw Learning Strategy on Students’ Attitudes towards Learning Chemistry
  62. Unveiling the Distinctive Impact of Vocational Schools Link and Match Collaboration with Industries for Holistic Workforce Readiness
  63. Students’ Perceptions of PBL Usefulness
  64. Assessing the Outcomes of Digital Soil Science Curricula for Agricultural Undergraduates in the Global South
  65. The Relationship between Epistemological Beliefs and Assessment Conceptions among Pre-Service Teachers
  66. Review Articles
  67. Fostering Creativity in Higher Education Institution: A Systematic Review (2018–2022)
  68. The Effects of Online Continuing Education for Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Scoping Review
  69. The Impact of Job Satisfaction on Teacher Mental Health: A Call to Action for Educational Policymakers
  70. Developing Multilingual Competence in Future Educators: Approaches, Challenges, and Best Practices
  71. Using Virtual Reality to Enhance Twenty-First-Century Skills in Elementary School Students: A Systematic Literature Review
  72. State-of-the-Art of STEAM Education in Science Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review
  73. Integration of Project-Based Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics to Improve Students’ Biology Practical Skills in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
  74. Teaching Work and Inequality in Argentina: Heterogeneity and Dynamism in Educational Research
  75. Case Study
  76. Teachers’ Perceptions of a Chatbot’s Role in School-based Professional Learning
Downloaded on 20.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/edu-2024-0049/html
Scroll to top button