Home Influencing Factors of Work–Life Balance Among Female Managers in Chinese Higher Education Institutions: A Delphi Study
Article Open Access

Influencing Factors of Work–Life Balance Among Female Managers in Chinese Higher Education Institutions: A Delphi Study

  • Shu Tang , Walton Wider EMAIL logo , Chee Pung Ng , Leilei Jiang , Jem Cloyd M. Tanucan , Jonna Karla C. Bien and Lester Naces Udang
Published/Copyright: March 26, 2024

Abstract

This research focuses on female managers and aims to explore the factors influencing work–life balance among female managers in Chinese higher education institutions (HEIs), while also ranking the importance of these factors within HEIs. The research is divided into five main sections and employs a two-round Delphi research method, utilizing expert discussions and opinions to thoroughly analyze the work–life balance challenges faced by female managers. The findings of the research reveal six primary dimensions that influence the work–life balance of female managers in Chinese HEIs. These factors, ranked in order of importance, are as follows: (1) family factors, (2) work-related factors, (3) cultural and social norms, (4) health factors, (5) self-management and personal skills, and (6) support and satisfaction. In conclusion, this research offers valuable recommendations for understanding and improving the work–life balance of female managers in Chinese HEIs, providing essential guidance for both these institutions and female managers in achieving a balanced development in their professional and personal lives.

1 Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges on a global scale, bringing attention to underlying concerns such as work–life balance and gender discrimination (Alon, Doepke, Olmstead-Rumsey, & Tertilt, 2020; Kaur, Balakrishnan, Chen, & Periasamy, 2022). The impact of this crisis is significant in China’s higher education sector, which comprises more than 3,013 institutions and employs an academic faculty of nearly 2 million full-time teachers (Kim, 2023; Ministry of Education, 2023). According to El Said (2021), female managers in the higher education sector in China face a convergence of these challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid shift from traditional in-person academic methods to online platforms, resulting in female managers facing distinct pressures (Aldossari & Chaudhry, 2021). Female managers encountered challenges in adapting to the new teaching paradigm, as they were influenced by long-standing patriarchal norms. These challenges were further compounded by increased domestic responsibilities, resulting in a blurred boundary between their professional and personal lives (Diego-Medrano & Salazar, 2021; Mavin & Yusupova, 2021).

The concept of work–life balance, which refers to the attainment of equilibrium between one’s professional and personal domains, holds particular relevance (Marques & Berry, 2021). In addition to their regular managerial responsibilities, female managers in the higher education sector frequently find themselves engaged in academic duties that extend beyond standard office hours (Park & Park-Ozee, 2020; Tsegay, Ashraf, Perveen, & Zegergish, 2022). These duties encompass tasks such as lesson planning, assignment grading, and various administrative responsibilities, which persist even during designated breaks (Love & Marshall, 2022; Wut & Xu, 2021). As a result, female managers in higher education faced greater challenges in achieving work–life balance (Wood, Oh, Park, & Kim, 2020).

The increase in the percentage of female managers in Chinese higher education to more than 30% in 2021 is a noteworthy development (Cao, 2022; Tang & Horta, 2021). However, the interconnection between work and family, which is deeply embedded in the traditional Chinese culture, presents considerable obstacles (Yang, 2022). The interplay between familial harmony and work dynamics is a recurring theme in scholarly literature (Purwanto, 2020). Although it was commonly believed that work–life balance performed better in the education sector, the actual situation was not necessarily so (Badri, 2019). Higher education institutions (HEIs) were currently facing stricter scrutiny and significant pressure (Hartman & Barber, 2020; Lee et al., 2022). In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic and the preexisting work–life tensions related to gender equality had exacerbated the issue (Yavorsky, Qian, & Sargent, 2021). With females assuming additional roles in education, school supervision, and other family responsibilities, the demand for remote work had significantly increased, posing greater challenges (Walters, Mehl, Piraino, Jansen, & Kriger, 2022).

The work from home strategy, which emerged as a response to the pandemic, aimed to mitigate the spread of the virus while maintaining productivity. However, this approach introduced a range of complexities (Daneshfar, Asokan-Ajitha, Sharma, & Malik, 2023; Oakman, Kinsman, Graham, Stuckey, & Weale, 2022; Sultana et al., 2021). Female academics, particularly those who are simultaneously managing their roles as mothers, experienced a disproportionate impact. The emergence of challenges stemming from the digital divide and logistical issues has resulted in an increased workload (Makura, 2022). The disparities have become increasingly evident among women, particularly those from marginalized backgrounds, thereby exacerbating the digital divide between privileged and underprivileged individuals (Roy & Mishra, 2022).

This research primarily focused on female managers and analyzed the factors influencing work–life balance (Poggesi, Mari, & De Vita, 2019). Through this research, the researcher hoped to assist female managers in Chinese HEIs in effectively managing the relationship between work and life, maintaining a balanced state in both areas, and achieving important benefits in terms of their professional development, job performance, and overall quality of life (Gandhi & Sen, 2021). This study focuses on answering these two research objectives:

  1. To examine the factors that influence work–life balance among female managers in Chinese higher education institution.

  2. To rank the identified factors that influence work–life balance among female managers in Chinese higher education institution.

1.1 Theoretical Underpinning

The factors influencing work–life balance among female managers in Chinese HEIs can be analyzed and understood through multiple theoretical frameworks (De Clercq & Brieger, 2021). These theories offer a comprehensive understanding of the factors that impact the successful integration of work–life balance among female managers in these institutions (Chaudhuri, Arora, & Roy, 2020).

According to the role theory, individuals play different roles in society, and these roles can bring about conflicts (Zhang, Moeckel, Moreno, Shuai, & Gao, 2020). Female managers in Chinese HEIs often juggle professional roles alongside family roles. These dual responsibilities might have conflicting demands and expectations, challenging their work–life balance (Adisa, Aiyenitaju, & Adekoya, 2021).

The work–family conflict theory focuses on the tensions between work and family roles (Allen, Manning, Longmore, & Giordano, 2019). This conflict can be categorized into two types: work interference with family and family interference with work (Lyu & Fan, 2020). For female managers in these institutions, conflicts between work and family can hinder their ability to maintain equilibrium, leading to stress and tension (Kara, Günes, & Tüysüzer, 2021).

The social support theory posits that social support is crucial for individuals’ psychological well-being and adaptability (Jolly, Kong, & Kim, 2021). For these managers, support from family, organizations, and society can enhance their capacity to balance work and family, thereby reducing work–life stress (Bartlett, Arslan, Bankston, & Sarabipour, 2021).

The self-efficacy theory underscores the influence of individuals’ confidence and assessment of their ability to complete specific tasks on their behavioral performance (Pekkala & van Zoonen, 2022). The self-efficacy of female managers in these institutions plays a pivotal role in their performance and efforts toward work–life balance (Tang, Ma, Naumann, & Xing, 2020). If they assess their abilities and resources positively and believe in their capability to manage both work and family effectively, they are more likely to strike a balance (Althammer, Reis, Van der Beek, Beck, & Michel, 2021).

These theoretical frameworks offer diverse perspectives and concepts to elucidate the challenges of work–life balance for female managers in Chinese HEIs. By integrating these theories, a more comprehensive understanding and solution to these challenges can be derived, providing enhanced support and development opportunities for these managers.

1.2 Literature Review

1.2.1 Chinese HEIs

Chinese HEIs refer to institutions established within China that provide higher education teaching and research (Ministry of Education, 2022). These institutions can include universities, colleges, research institutes, vocational schools, and other educational entities, covering various disciplinary fields (Feng, 2019). Chinese HEIs are typically managed and operated by national, provincial, municipal, or private organizations. They offer degree programs such as undergraduate, master’s, and doctoral education, as well as various continuing education programs.

In the past 20 years, Chinese higher education underwent an absolute expansion rate that was unparalleled anywhere else in the world (Yang, 2020). In 2022, the gross enrollment rate in higher education reached 59.6%, compared to only 9.8% in 2002 (Ministry of Education, 2023). When it came to establishing world class HEIs with a research focus, the emphasis lay not only on the expansion of these institutions but also on the quality of teaching (De Wit & Altbach, 2021). In 2004, the Higher Education Evaluation Center of the Ministry of Education was established, and the 5-year evaluation of undergraduate teaching was implemented as a key measure to enhance the teaching quality (Zhou, Zhou, & Zhou, 2019). The institutionalization of this teaching evaluation made it a top priority for HEIs, shifting the pressure onto teachers (Posselt, Hernandez, Villarreal, Rodgers, & Irwin, 2020).

Meanwhile, with the gradual saturation of the academic labor market, the admission criteria and promotion standards of Chinese HEIs were also rising (Mok & Marginson, 2021). In addition, compared to Western universities, Chinese HEIs demonstrated a noticeable tendency toward bureaucratization, which added extra pressure on faculty members (Bodenhorn, 2020). The teacher evaluation mechanisms were dominated by administrative powers and often contradicted academic logic (Vican, Friedman, & Andreasen, 2020). According to surveys conducted among faculty members in Chinese HEIs, administrative affairs were identified as the primary factor contributing to increased stress levels among teachers (Farmer, 2020). There exists a conflict and contradiction between the time perspective required for academic work and the time perspective reflected in administrative management, resulting in crises in the physical and mental health, professional identity, and academic innovation of faculty members in HEIs (Kruse, Hackmann, & Lindle, 2020).

1.2.2 Female Managers

Female managers referred to female who held managerial positions within an organization or institution (Birindelli, Iannuzzi, & Savioli, 2019). They were responsible for leadership, decision-making, and managerial tasks within the organization, and bore the responsibility of fostering teamwork, achieving objectives, and enhancing performance (Ali & Kamraju, 2023). Female managers held managerial positions in HEIs, such as department heads, supervisors, and administrative personnel (Bertrand, 2019). They were responsible for organizing and coordinating academic affairs, human resource management, budgeting, resource allocation, and other related tasks (Jahan, 2022).

According to Shekhar (2021), it was suggested that females tended to be more inclined toward communication, coordination, and building a harmonious team atmosphere to promote organizational development in the leadership process. By comparing and analyzing the management styles of male and female, differences in leadership styles between the sexes could be identified (Larsson & Alvinius, 2020). Male leadership styles were often more assertive, relying on coercive and transactional means to control subordinates, while female leadership styles were generally more gentle, relying on communication, leading by example, and motivation to guide subordinates (Mulawarman & Komariyah, 2021). Female leaders had certain advantages in talent utilization and talent management, while males tended to have advantages in strategic decision-making and crisis management (Offermann & Foley, 2020).

1.2.3 Work–Life Balance

Globally, work–life balance had become a worldwide trend (Noda, 2020). Particularly in HEIs, the tremendous societal advancements had brought about significant complexity in work–life balance (Saadat Hashimi, 2021). Female managers not only needed to manage their families but also their work, which often left them with little time to reflect on their career and sometimes neglected their personal life needs, leading to a dilemma between work pressures and family demands (Karakose, Yirci, & Papadakis, 2021). Therefore, work–life balance became one of the major challenges faced by most female managers (Bella & Chandran, 2019). Research indicated that there were differences in the work–life balance among females with different work backgrounds, fields, and positions (Jain, Jain, & Bansal, 2023). The role of motherhood posed a challenging factor in maintaining a balance between career and family (Uddin, 2021). Many female managers expressed that their HEIs lacked policies regarding work–life balance (Rawal, 2023). However, if mothers could maintain a good balance between life and work, they could focus more on raising their children properly and their personal career growth (Guy & Arthur, 2020).

The relationship between gender discrimination, male-dominated culture, and work–life stereotypes in Chinese HEIs is complex and influenced by historical, cultural, and societal norms. These elements collectively create a cyclical pattern of gender inequities that consistently impact the work–life balance of female managers in HEIs. In the Chinese society, men have traditionally been regarded as the main providers, while women have been assigned the role of caregivers (Li, 2020). Traditional expectations, particularly in academic environments, place significant pressure on women, requiring them to constantly juggle their professional aspirations and family responsibilities. This frequently results in a societal division where any departure from the established standard, such as a woman placing her career as a priority, can attract scrutiny and criticism.

Although existing research has examined the work–life balance challenges faced by female managers, further research is required to investigate the long-term effects of these challenges on their career development (Khan, Salamzadeh, Shah, & Hussain, 2021). Exploring factors such as promotion rates, job satisfaction, and career aspirations can provide insights into how work–life balance issues influence their professional growth (Ahmed & ElHaj, 2023).

2 Methods

2.1 Research Design

This research employed a two-round Delphi method as the research design to explore the factors influencing work–life balance among female managers in Chinese HEIs. The Delphi method involved soliciting opinions and feedback from the expert panel through carefully designed tools, such as questionnaires (Mohd Noor, Rasli, Abdul Rashid, Mubarak, & Abas, 2022; Olsen, Wolcott, Haines, Janke, & McLaughlin, 2021), to understand their perspectives on the factors influencing work–life balance among female managers in Chinese HEIs. The Delphi method was suitable for investigating topics characterized by divergent, ambiguous, or controversial views and serves as a viable alternative when direct empirical evidence was unavailable, as was the case in this research (Lippert, 2019).

2.2 Developing the Delphi Method Instrument

This research convened an expert panel of 40 experienced female managers from 25 Chinese HEIs. Participants were selected based on their work experience, specifically having held a managerial position for at least 5 years. This ensured they could offer pertinent insights and valuable data related to the research topic. In the first round of the Delphi method, their task was to identify and list the known factors that influence the work–life balance of female managers in Chinese HEIs. Experts received the questionnaire via email and were asked to provide their responses within a specified time frame. The responses from the experts were carefully analyzed to identify any repetitions or similarities in their answers (Drumm, Bradley, & Moriarty, 2022). Based on this analysis, a consolidated list of responses was compiled and used for the preparation of the second-round survey (Mitsuyama, Son, Eto, & Kikukawa, 2023).

The second round of the Delphi method was a critical step for refining and validating the insights gathered from the first round of expert opinions (Han, Kalantari, & Rajabifard, 2023). Building upon the initial feedback provided by the experts in the first round, the second round aimed to assess the level of consensus and prioritize the factors influencing the work–life balance of female managers in Chinese HEIs (Fink-Hafner, Dagen, Doušak, Novak, & Hafner-Fink, 2019). In the second-round evaluation, experts were asked to rank the importance of each dimension identified in the consolidated response list (Neumann, Tiberius, & Biendarra, 2022). These rankings enabled researchers to assess the relative importance of factors influencing the work–life balance of female managers in Chinese HEIs. The questionnaire employed a ranking method where experts assigned a numerical value or rank to each dimension to indicate their perceived level of importance (Soh & Martens, 2022). To ensure the accuracy of the rankings, each number could only be used once for each dimension, avoiding duplicate rankings that could introduce issues during the statistical analysis (Saihi, Ben-Daya, & As’ ad, 2023). This quantitative approach enabled a systematic evaluation and comparison of various factors, ensuring a more rigorous and objective analysis (Qureshi, Naseem, & Ahmad, 2023). Average rankings and group rankings were calculated based on the experts’ responses to provide valuable insights reflecting the collective opinion of the group (Durugbo, Al-Balushi, Anouze, & Amoudi, 2020).

Throughout the Delphi process, it was anticipated that some experts might drop out (Schmalz, Spinler, & Ringbeck, 2021). However, the effectiveness of the Delphi tool was maintained due to the iterative nature of the process, and each round built upon the results of the previous round to ensure continuity (Revez et al., 2020). This approach allows for the refinement and consensus-building process to continue even if some experts dropped out between the two rounds of surveys (Calleo, Di Zio, & Pilla, 2023).

2.3 Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (W)

Kendall’s W coefficient was calculated to assess the level of consensus among participating experts regarding the identified factors (Tee et al., 2022). Kendall’s W was used to measure the degree of consistency among experts in ranking the elements. If the value of Kendall’s W was significant, it indicated that the experts had used similar criteria in assessing the importance of the factors, suggesting consensus among the expert group (Weiss et al., 2021). A Kendall’s W value close to 1 was expected, indicating strong consensus among the experts (Mubarak, Hatah, Aris, Shafie, & Zin, 2019). In addition, a low p-value below 0.05 indicates statistical significance and further supports the presence of consensus (Eze, Sofolahan, & Omoboye, 2023). These results indicated the consistency among the experts in assessing and ranking the factors (Kaveladze, Wasil, Bunyi, Ramirez, & Schueller, 2022).

3 Results

3.1 First Round of the Delphi Method

On June 14, 2023, this research invited 40 experts from different fields to participate in the Delphi method. To facilitate the experts and researchers, invitations were sent via email. The advantage of using email was its convenience and time-saving nature (Ingley, Singh, & Malkani, 2020). Only 21 experts responded positively to the invitation and agreed to participate in the first round of the Delphi method. Their profiles are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1

Experts’ profile (N = 21 female managers)

No. Age Experience (in years) Position in CHEI Background of CHEI
E1 46 19 Associate Professor Guiyang Institute of Information Science and Technology is a full-time private university approved by the Ministry of Education
E2 48 19 Associate Professor
E3 41 17 Associate Professor
E4 45 20 Deputy Director General Guizhou University is a provincial research university located in suburban Guiyang, capital of Guizhou, China
E5 46 20 Lecturer
E6 40 13 Associate Professor
E7 40 15 Professor Mingde College of Guizhou University is a full-time comprehensive college approved by the Guizhou Provincial People’s Government and the Ministry of Education
E8 38 11 Lecturer
E9 35 13 Deputy Director General
E10 38 12 Associate Professor Southwest University of Science and Technology is a provincial public university in Mianyang, Sichuan
E11 35 7 Lecturer Nanchong Vocational and Technical College is a full-time higher education institute. It is located in Nanchong city, which is the central city in the northeast of Sichuan province
E12 36 13 Professor East China Normal University is a comprehensive public research university
E13 42 20 Associate Professor Nanchang University is a public research university
E14 35 8 Lecturer College of Science and Technology of Guizhou University is a comprehensive full-day hosted by the new mechanism and model of Guizhou University and Guizhou Jetstar Air Travel Co., Ltd. Independent Undergraduate College
E15 37 9 Professor Jiamusi University is a multi-disciplinary university
E16 43 10 Professor Tsinghua University is a national public research university
E17 39 13 Associate Professor Xi ‘an University of Architecture and Technology is a multi-disciplinary university featuring civil engineering, environment and municipal administration, materials metallurgy and other related disciplines, with engineering and technology disciplines as the main subjects
E18 36 8 Associate Professor Chongqing University of Technology is a public research university in Chongqing
E19 27 5 Lecturer Tianjin University of Technology is a municipal public university
E20 27 5 Director Guizhou Engineering Vocational College is a higher vocational college of technology and engineering with communications as its characteristic
E21 38 12 Subdean Guizhou Institute of Technology is a provincial undergraduate university of science and technology that was established by the Ministry of Education and a member of the CDIO Engineering Education Alliance

In the first round of the Delphi method discussion, the attending experts put forth 27 topics relevant to the research. These topics underwent careful review and synthesis (Pongruengkiat et al., 2023). Ultimately, these topics were categorized into six dimensions, covering various factors influencing the work–life balance among female managers in Chinese HEIs. Detailed classification results can be seen in Table 2.

Table 2

Consolidation of Round One Delphi Findings

No. Dimensions Themes
1 Work factors
  • Work environment

  • Job satisfaction

  • Work ability

  • Work stress

  • Career development pressure

  • Promotion opportunities

  • Organizational culture

  • Policies and support measures

  • Work flexibility

2 Cultural and social norms
  • Traditional culture

  • Traditional gender norms

  • Gender discrimination

  • Traditional social roles

  • Gender roles and societal expectations

3 Health factors
  • Physical health

  • Mental health

  • Emotion imbalance

  • Health imbalance

4 Family Factors
  • Family roles

  • Work-family imbalance

  • Family relations

  • Family responsibilities

5 Self-management and personal
  • Personal skills and management abilities

  • Self-management

  • Time allocation

6 Support and satisfaction
  • Social support

  • Life satisfaction

Based on the results of the discussions, six dimensions were identified, covering various factors influencing the work–life balance among female managers in Chinese HEIs. These dimensions include work factors, cultural and social norms, health factors, family factors, self-management and personal skills, and support and satisfaction.

Each dimension consists of a certain number of themes (Almaiah et al., 2022). Specifically, the work factors dimension comprised nine themes: work environment, job satisfaction, work ability, work stress, career development pressure, promotion opportunities, organizational culture, policies and support measures, and work flexibility. The cultural and social norms dimension consisted of five themes: work flexibility, traditional gender norms, gender discrimination, traditional social roles, and gender roles and societal expectations. The health factors dimension included four themes: physical health, mental health, emotion imbalance, and health imbalance. The family factors dimension covered four themes: family roles, work–family imbalance, family relations, and family responsibilities. Finally, the self-management and personal skills dimension contained three themes: personal skills and management abilities, self-management, and time allocation. The support and satisfaction dimension comprised two themes: social support and life satisfaction.

3.2 Second Round of the Delphi Method

On June 21, 2023, this research commenced the second round of the Delphi procedure. The responses from the experts who participated in the first round were compiled and categorized into six dimensions. The same set of experts was reconvened and tasked with ranking the various dimensions influencing the work–life balance among female managers in Chinese HEIs. They were instructed to rank the dimensions using numbers from 1 (most important) to 6 (least important). Furthermore, they were informed that each number should be assigned to only one factor to avoid interfering with statistical analysis (Babalola, Aigbavboa, & Thwala, 2022). According to Table 3, a total of 18 experts completed the ranking of the six dimensions in the second round of the Delphi method. This will provide valuable data for further analysis. Attrition is a common phenomenon observed in Delphi techniques, and attaining a zero attrition rate is an exceptionally rare occasion (Jandhyala, 2020).

Table 3

Second Round of Delphi Method

Experts Work Factors Cultural and Social Norms Health Factors Family Factors Self-Management and Personal Skills Support and Satisfaction
E1 4 3 2 1 5 6
E2 6 4 1 2 3 5
E3 4 2 6 3 5 1
E4 5 1 4 2 6 3
E5 2 1 6 5 4 3
E6 2 1 6 3 5 4
E7 2 5 4 3 1 6
E8 1 6 3 4 2 5
E9 4 3 6 1 2 5
E10 3 1 5 2 4 6
E11 4 1 2 3 5 6
E12 1 5 2 3 4 6
E13 6 4 2 3 1 5
E14 1 5 3 2 4 6
E15 4 5 2 1 3 6
E16 3 4 2 1 5 6
E17 4 6 5 1 3 2
Mean 3.29 3.35 3.59 2.35 3.65 4.76
Group Rank 2 3 4 1 5 6

Based on the data presented in Table 3, the average rankings of the six dimensions ranged from 2.35 to 4.76. The order of importance for the dimensions is as follows: family factors (2.35), work factors (3.29), cultural and social norms (3.35), health factors (3.59), self-management and personal skills (3.65), and support and satisfaction (4.76).

It is worth noting that based on a Kendall’s W value of 0.172 and a p-value of 0.012, the rankings among the experts participating in the second round are consistent. This implies that there is no need for a third round of the Delphi method, as sufficient consensus has been achieved.

4 Discussion

After completing the second round of research, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) was used to measure the level of consensus among experts on the proposed dimensions. In the second round of the Delphi method, the calculated Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was 0.172, with a corresponding p-value of 0.012. These results indicated that the research achieved statistical significance in the second round (p-value less than 0.05).

Based on these findings, the order of importance for the six dimensions is as follows: (1) family factors, (2) work factors, (3) culture and social norms, (4) health factors, (5) self-management and personal skills, and (6) support and satisfaction. These results suggest that family factors are the most critical aspect affecting the work–life balance of female managers in Chinese HEIs. This implies that family factors are of great importance to female managers and significantly influence their job performance and life satisfaction.

4.1 Family Factors

Female managers’ work-life balance in Chinese HEIs is heavily influenced by family factors. These managers, who are deeply embedded in a spectrum of family roles, must navigate the dual pressures of professional identity and familial commitments. As Maheshwari (2021) emphasizes, their identities are not limited to their managerial roles; they also play the roles of wives, mothers, and daughters.

This fusion is more than just a personal preference; it is heavily influenced by societal and cultural expectations deeply rooted in the Chinese milieu. Regardless of their professional status, the cultural fabric frequently positions these women to meet family-centric needs, whether catering to children or attending to the elderly (Feng & Savani, 2020). This frequently leads to increased work-related stress, which strains their ability to manage their time effectively (Loziak, Fedáková, & Čopková, 2020). This balance is heavily influenced by the tone and quality of their family relationships. While harmonious family dynamics serve as buffers against professional strains, providing emotional sustenance and resilience (Sun, Zhou, Shao, Wang, & Sun, 2022; Wong, Lee, Teh, & Chan, 2021), strained familial relationships can exacerbate these difficulties, jeopardizing their work–life balance (Wei & Ye, 2022). The dominant theme of familial obligations is embedded in this. Chinese cultural values have traditionally ordained women as primary caregivers and the foundation of family structures (Li, 2020). Such roles, while admired, frequently come at the expense of their professional ambitions, draining their energy and requiring an inordinate amount of time (Adisa, Abdulraheem, & Isiaka, 2019; Akanji, Mordi, & Ajonbadi, 2020a). To overcome these obstacles, these managers employ refined time-management strategies, rely on extended family support, and implement a variety of stress-relieving measures (Tamunomiebi & Oyibo, 2020).

Addressing these complex issues necessitates multifaceted approaches. HEIs can play a critical role in challenging these entrenched norms and stereotypes by launching campaigns. They can foster an environment of understanding and recognition for these multifaceted roles by embracing flexible working patterns. Creating support structures, such as mentorship programs and peer support groups, can help these women even more. Fostering societal dialogues that emphasize shared familial obligations, in general, can help to rebalance and harmonize the work–life balance in these environments.

4.2 Work Factors

The work factors were identified as the second most important factor influencing the work–life balance of female managers in Chinese HEIs. A positive work environment in HEIs includes providing suitable facilities and resources, as well as fostering a supportive teacher community atmosphere (Jacob, Jegede, & Musa, 2021). Suitable work facilities and resources can offer necessary support to female managers, making their teaching and office work more comfortable and efficient (Aithal & Aithal, 2019). Convenient and adequate work facilities also reduce inconveniences and distractions at work, allowing them more time to focus on family and personal needs (Akuamoah-Boateng, 2020).

The increasing number of student enrollments presents significant challenges, particularly for female managers in higher education. An increase in student enrollment has various implications beyond larger class sizes. It leads to increased demands from students, greater workload for teachers, reduced preparation time, frequent schedule changes, increased paperwork, and potential shortages of teachers and resources (Wood, 2022). These elements have an impact on the operational aspects of an educational institution, either directly or indirectly. Female managers may experience heightened stress when dealing with the complexities of student enrollment. As class sizes grow, the need for effective communication becomes more crucial to address the individual needs of every student. Moreover, work schedules may result in unpredictable work hours, potentially conflicting with family obligations, particularly impacting women to a greater extent historically. Female managers may experience pressure to find solutions in an unsupportive or unsympathetic work environment due to potential resource shortages and the expectation to fulfill both professional and caregiving responsibilities. Female managers in Chinese HEIs are better equipped to deal with enrollment-related challenges when they have the necessary work skills. Romiani, Abili, Pourkaremi, and Farahbakhsh (2021) emphasized the significance of key competencies such as professional knowledge, leadership abilities, communication abilities, and teaching proficiency. Exemplifying excellence in these areas not only improves work efficiency but also instills a strong sense of confidence in managing the often precarious balance between professional and personal obligations (Rutledge, 2020).

Female managers’ professional journey, however, is not limited to enrollment challenges. They face a slew of stressors, ranging from pressing research demands to looming work deadlines to the plethora of expectations from various stakeholders (Mathews, Khumalo, & Dlamini, 2022). Among these difficulties, the issue of promotional opportunities, or the lack thereof, is a major source of concern. Both those who advance and those who do not face unique challenges in environments where such opportunities are scarce. For the former, limited promotional opportunities may require them to constantly validate their elevated positions, resulting in extended working hours and increased responsibilities, often at the expense of personal time. Those who are not promoted, on the other hand, may experience feelings of professional stagnation, further straining their work–life balance. While promotions are generally regarded as indicators of professional success, the complex dynamics of such environments can occasionally make them sources of increased stress, affecting work–life balance. This highlights the importance of a more supportive and transparent promotional system that not only provides growth but also ensures that growth does not come at the expense of personal well-being. Promotional opportunities, as noted by Allen et al. (2021), can indeed motivate individuals to excel in their roles. However, it is critical that these opportunities are equitable and do not exacerbate work–life conflicts (Blithe & Elliott, 2020). As a result, prioritizing effective stress management strategies is critical in achieving a harmonious balance between work and personal life.

Organizational culture encompasses the values, beliefs, and behavioral guidelines of an organization (Akanji, Mordi, Ituma, Adisa, & Ajonbadi, 2020b). A work–life balance supportive HEIs culture encourages flexible work arrangements and respects the personal needs of teachers, allowing them to better balance work and family (Jais & Suat, 2022). At the same time, policies and resources formulated by the Ministry of Education can help female managers better manage the conflict between work and family demands (Daraba, Wirawan, Salam, & Faisal, 2021). These policies and measures include flexible work hours, providing reasonable vacation policies and parental leave and offering work-time flexibility, among others (Magnusson, 2021). Such work flexibility helps reduce work stress, enabling female managers to balance their careers and family life more effectively (Ren & Caudle, 2020).

4.3 Culture and Social Norms

The cultural and social norms were identified as the third most important factor related to work–life balance. This study highlights the widespread gender discrimination that women encounter in their professional advancement. According to Casad et al. (2021), female managers face various structural disadvantages, such as wage disparities and limited opportunities for career advancement, which can be demoralizing. The incompatibility between women’s personal and professional lives is implied when personal roles, such as childbirth or familial responsibilities, are perceived as penalties in professional settings. Systemic biases pose a risk of discouraging talented women from pursuing higher positions, thereby perpetuating the male-dominated culture within these institutions.

Traditional social norms continue to perpetuate gender disparities, even in changing times. O’Connell and McKinnon (2021) emphasize that the prevailing societal expectations place a heavier burden on women in academia to fulfill familial responsibilities. This can unintentionally hinder their professional ambitions and steer them towards less preferred roles. The reinforcement of traditional roles in societal consciousness creates a self-perpetuating cycle that poses a significant barrier. The stereotype that women are less capable of managing academic workloads due to their familial responsibilities reinforces gender discrimination and the existing male-dominated paradigm.

These findings have important implications for academia and society as a whole. An environment that fails to promote and support its female professionals may miss out on the valuable and diverse perspectives that women contribute to academic discourse. Furthermore, if these established norms are not questioned, the gender disparities in higher education and society as a whole may continue to exist. This results in two negative outcomes: the ongoing marginalization of women and the underutilization of human potential in academia. To address this issue, it is crucial for institutions to implement structural reforms. This may include policies promoting work–life balance, gender-neutral parental leave, and initiatives such as unconscious bias training and women-focused mentorship programs.

4.4 Health Factors

Health factors were determined as the fourth most important factor related to work–life balance. Maintaining good physical health contributes to the vitality and efficiency of female managers in balancing work and family life (Adnan, Muda, Wan Jusoh, & Yusoff, 2022). Health issues can result in frequent leaves of absence or extended medical leaves, which can disrupt work plans and the stability of the teaching team (Soomro et al., 2023). Mental health is closely related to the emotions, feelings, and cognitive state of female managers (Wu, Zhang, Zhu, & Jiang, 2021). If their mental health is unstable, they may have difficulty concentrating, lack positive work motivation, or experience negative emotions such as anxiety and depression (Luna, 2022). This can lead to imbalances in their work–life balance, making it challenging for them to cope effectively with work challenges, ultimately affecting family relationships and work performance (Restrepo & Lemos, 2021).

Emotional imbalance is caused by conflicts between managing work stress and family responsibilities (Heras Recuero & Osca Segovia, 2021). Female managers facing busy work tasks and family roles in higher education often experience emotional instability, fatigue, low moods, anxiety, and stress (Anjum, 2021). These emotional issues can lead to fatigue and low moods at work, affecting communication and understanding at both work and home, as well as overall life quality and work performance (Bonaccio, Lapierre, & O’Reilly, 2019). Health imbalance occurs when female managers neglect their personal lives and health while pursuing their career development (Gull, Asghar, Bashir, Liu, & Xiong, 2023). Overcommitment to work leads to a lack of rest and relaxation, impacting their physical and mental health (Bresee, 2019). Meanwhile, the pressure of family responsibilities prevents them from fully focusing on career development, resulting in missed opportunities for promotion and professional growth (Huo & Jiang, 2023).

4.5 Self-Management and Personal Skills

Self-management and personal skills were determined as the fifth most important factor related to work–life balance. The personal skills and management abilities of female managers directly influence their performance and work efficiency (Liu, Liu, Jiao, He, & Liu, 2023). When managing, female managers often apply their experience in educating children to guide employees in a way that encourages their autonomy and fosters creativity (Maher, 2022). This approach not only promotes the achievement of HEI goals but also encourages the personal growth of teachers (Ruan, Cai, & Stensaker, 2023). Having good personal skills, especially in management and leadership, enables them to better handle work tasks and responsibilities, effectively lead teams, solve problems, and make wise decisions (Zahid, 2021).

Self-management means learning to manage one’s emotions and behaviors, as well as making reasonable arrangements and adjustments to work and personal life (Hirschi, Zacher, & Shockley, 2022). Through effective self-management, female managers can better handle work challenges and pressures, reduce the likelihood of emotional imbalances, and maintain a positive mindset (Livingston, 2023). At the same time, proper time allocation enables them to better balance work and personal life, ensuring equilibrium between the two and avoiding overcommitting to work, which may lead to an imbalanced life (Bella, 2023).

4.6 Support and Satisfaction

“Support and satisfaction” emerged as the sixth most important dimension in our comprehensive assessment of the factors influencing work–life balance for female managers in China. Social support refers to the care, assistance, and backing that female executives receive from a variety of sources, including family, peers, colleagues, and organizational bodies in both their professional and personal lives (Oludayo & Omonijo, 2020). This type of support is critical, especially in situations where female executives must balance work and family responsibilities. A strong positive social support system acts as a reservoir of resources and assistance, providing female managers with the tools they need to navigate the challenges they face, mitigate work-related stressors, and reduce the overall burdens of life (Foy, Dwyer, Nafarrete, Hammoud, & Rockett, 2019).

Life satisfaction, on the other hand, is a more introspective measure that reflects female managers’ self-assessment and judgment of the quality of their lives (Bernarto et al., 2020). High levels of life satisfaction boost intrinsic motivation and an overall positive outlook. This internal drive enables them to confront and overcome both work and life adversities (Akosile & Ekemen, 2022). Nonetheless, despite their undeniable importance, these themes rank lower than other dimensions, possibly due to China’s deeply embedded cultural and societal constructs. Because of the emphasis on traditional roles and responsibilities, as well as the pressures of a rapidly urbanizing economy, tangible factors such as work environment or family demands may overshadow intangible elements such as support and satisfaction. The dynamic highlights the complex interplay of socio-cultural factors and their implications for work–life balance among Chinese female executives. As societal paradigms shift, it is critical to constantly re-evaluate and comprehend the evolving hierarchies of these influencing factors.

5 Conclusions

Through a meticulous exploration via the Delphi research method spanning two rounds, this study unveiled the pivotal determinants that shape the work–life balance of female managers in Chinese HEIs. These determinants span across six integral dimensions, with family factors standing out as the principal influencer. This is set against the backdrop of China’s extensive cultural framework, which is marked by deeply rooted stereotypes and gender norms. The research starkly illuminates the persistent gender discrimination that women grapple with in academia, further intensified by a predominantly male-centric cultural ambiance.

In light of the importance of family-centric elements, there’s an undeniable call for both governmental and institutional measures. However, instead of focusing solely on introducing a family-friendly culture, there is a profound need to pivot toward cultivating a gender-friendly culture. This would involve the introduction of policies such as flexible work hours, remote working capabilities, inclusive parental leaves, and robust family and gender support initiatives. Such actions would not merely counterbalance the disparities faced by women, but would also actively recognize, validate, and celebrate their diverse identities and roles.

More profoundly, it is essential to tackle the overarching cultural and societal norms, especially the ingrained gender biases and conventional paradigms that persist. Institutions bear the responsibility to pioneer efforts that challenge, deconstruct, and reshape these entrenched beliefs, thereby nurturing a more egalitarian and inclusive environment. By weaving together strategies addressing work factors, health variables, personal skills development, and comprehensive institutional support, we can envision a significant paradigm shift. Such a shift aims to bolster the professional acumen and holistic well-being of these female managers, forging a pathway toward a higher education sector that is not only aware of gender disparities but actively works toward obliterating them.

This research has some limitations that need to be acknowledged. First, the sample size was relatively small, consisting of only 40 female managers from specific HEIs, which restricts the generalizability of the survey results to other schools or companies. Second, there might be significant differences among female managers in HEIs regarding age, educational background, and positions, which could lead to varying impacts on work–life balance, further affecting the representativeness of the research results. Future research could collaborate with experts from other countries to compare the work–life balance of female managers in different countries or regions, revealing commonalities and differences, and drawing upon successful experiences from other countries as references for Chinese policies and measures. Researchers can compare the survey questionnaires and measurement methods used in different studies to identify widely accepted dimensions and determine specific unique issues for Chinese female managers. Future research can also adopt longitudinal studies to track the same group at multiple time points, obtaining more stable and reliable data, thus enhancing the credibility and effectiveness of research results. Through these measures, future research will gain a more comprehensive and objective understanding of the work–life balance of Chinese female managers, providing support and suggestions for developing more targeted policies and measures.

  1. Funding information: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or nonprofit sectors.

  2. Author contributions: All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Data availability statement: The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the corresponding author.

References

Adisa, T. A., Abdulraheem, I., & Isiaka, S. B. (2019). Patriarchal hegemony: Investigating the impact of patriarchy on women’s work-life balance. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 34(1), 19–33.10.1108/GM-07-2018-0095Search in Google Scholar

Adisa, T. A., Aiyenitaju, O., & Adekoya, O. D. (2021). The work–family balance of British working women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(2), 241–260.10.1108/JWAM-07-2020-0036Search in Google Scholar

Adnan, N. L., Muda, R., Wan Jusoh, W. N. H., & Yusoff, R. (2022). Is the vitality of Malaysian academics at stake? Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 14(4), 1536–1553.10.1108/JARHE-05-2021-0192Search in Google Scholar

Ahmed, A., & ElHaj, M. (2023). Factors impacting female career success in leadership: Insights from female leaders on their journey of professional growth and leadership. (MBA thesis). Gävle, Sweden: University of Gävle.Search in Google Scholar

Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2019). Building world-class universities: Some insights & predictions. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 4(2), 13–35.10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0067Search in Google Scholar

Akanji, B., Mordi, C., & Ajonbadi, H. A. (2020a). The experiences of work-life balance, stress, and coping lifestyles of female professionals: Insights from a developing country. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(4), 999–1015.10.1108/ER-01-2019-0089Search in Google Scholar

Akanji, B., Mordi, C., Ituma, A., Adisa, T. A., & Ajonbadi, H. (2020b). The influence of organizational culture on leadership style in higher education institutions. Personnel Review, 49(3), 709–732.10.1108/PR-08-2018-0280Search in Google Scholar

Akosile, A. L., & Ekemen, M. A. (2022). The impact of core self-evaluations on job satisfaction and turnover intention among higher education academic staff: Mediating roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), 236.10.3390/bs12070236Search in Google Scholar

Akuamoah-Boateng, C. (2020). Balancing work, family and personal life: Perspectives of female staff at the College of Distance Education, University of Cape Coast, Ghana. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 12(1), 43–51.10.5897/IJEAPS2019.0643Search in Google Scholar

Aldossari, M., & Chaudhry, S. (2021). Women and burnout in the context of a pandemic. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(2), 826–834.10.1111/gwao.12567Search in Google Scholar

Ali, M. A., & Kamraju, M. (2023). The role of women in rural development programs. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education, 2(1), 67–84.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, A. L., Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2019). Young adult parents’ work–family conflict: The roles of parenting stress and parental conflict. In Transitions into parenthood: Examining the complexities of childrearing (Vol. 15, pp. 1–16). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited.10.1108/S1530-353520190000015001Search in Google Scholar

Allen, K. A., Butler-Henderson, K., Reupert, A., Longmuir, F., Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., Berger, E., … & Fleer, M. (2021). Work like a girl: Redressing gender inequity in academia through systemic solutions. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(3), 3.10.53761/1.18.3.3Search in Google Scholar

Almaiah, M. A., Hajjej, F., Lutfi, A., Al-Khasawneh, A., Alkhdour, T., Almomani, O., & Shehab, R. (2022). A conceptual framework for determining quality requirements for mobile learning applications using Delphi method. Electronics, 11(5), 788.10.3390/electronics11050788Search in Google Scholar

Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality (No. w26947). Cambridge, United States: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w26947Search in Google Scholar

Althammer, S. E., Reis, D., Van der Beek, S., Beck, L., & Michel, A. (2021). A mindfulness intervention promoting work–life balance: How segmentation preference affects changes in detachment, well‐being, and work–life balance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(2), 282–308.10.1111/joop.12346Search in Google Scholar

Anjum, Q. (2021). Understanding educators’ well-being from the perspectives of senior-secondary teachers and school leaders: A study of the Cambridge School System in Pakistan. Canada: McGill University.Search in Google Scholar

Babalola, H. I., Aigbavboa, C., & Thwala, W. (2022, July). A Delphi approach on the challenges of human resource management practices implementation in the Nigerian construction industry. In Construction Industry Development Board Postgraduate Research Conference (pp. 518–530). Cham: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-22434-8_51Search in Google Scholar

Badri, S. K. Z. (2019). Affective well-being in the higher education sector: Connecting work-life balance with mental health, job satisfaction and turnover intention issues inside the academia setting. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 5(3), 225–241.10.1504/IJHD.2019.103382Search in Google Scholar

Bartlett, M. J., Arslan, F. N., Bankston, A., & Sarabipour, S. (2021). Ten simple rules to improve academic work–life balance. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(7), e1009124.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009124Search in Google Scholar

Bella, K. M. J. (2023). The Influence of Time Management: Balancing Work and Personal Priorities. International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, 2(1), 17–24.10.61778/z0n81p57Search in Google Scholar

Bella, K. M. J., & Chandran, M. (2019). A study on work-life balance and challenges faced by working women in the IT sector. In National Conference On Technology Enabled Teaching And Learning In Higher Education, School of Management Studies, VISTAS, Chennai, India (Vol. 9, Issue Special, February 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bernarto, I., Bachtiar, D., Sudibjo, N., Suryawan, I. N., Purwanto, A., & Asbari, M. (2020). Effect of transformational leadership, perceived organizational support, job satisfaction toward life satisfaction: Evidences from Indonesian teachers. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(03), 5495–5503.Search in Google Scholar

Bertrand, D. W. (2019). The practice of executive coaching to improve leadership capacity in academic deans at American higher education institutions. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 12(2), 110–124.10.1080/17521882.2018.1545136Search in Google Scholar

Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1485–1499.10.1002/csr.1762Search in Google Scholar

Blithe, S. J., & Elliott, M. (2020). Gender inequality in the academy: Microaggressions, work-life conflict, and academic rank. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(7), 751–764.10.1080/09589236.2019.1657004Search in Google Scholar

Bodenhorn, T. (2020). Management and “administerization” in China’s higher education system: A view from the trenches. The China Quarterly, 244, 969–987.10.1017/S0305741020000971Search in Google Scholar

Bonaccio, S., Lapierre, L. M., & O’Reilly, J. (2019). Creating work climates that facilitate and maximize the benefits of disclosing mental health problems in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 48(3), 113–122.10.1016/j.orgdyn.2019.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Bresee, A. M. (2019). Professorial workloads and emotional labour. (Doctoral dissertation). Ontario, Canada: McMaster University.Search in Google Scholar

Calleo, Y., Di Zio, S., & Pilla, F. (2023). Facilitating spatial consensus in complex future scenarios through Real-Time Spatial Delphi: A novel web-based open platform. Futures & Foresight Science, 5, e155.10.1002/ffo2.155Search in Google Scholar

Cao, J. (2022, December 28). Teaching staff at all levels and in all types of schools. Ministry of Education. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/moe_560/2021/quanguo/202301/t20230104_1038059.html.Search in Google Scholar

Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13–23.10.1002/jnr.24631Search in Google Scholar

Chaudhuri, S., Arora, R., & Roy, P. (2020). Work–Life balance policies and organisational outcomes–a review of literature from the Indian context. Industrial and Commercial Training, 52(3), 155–170.10.1108/ICT-01-2019-0003Search in Google Scholar

Daneshfar, Z., Asokan-Ajitha, A., Sharma, P., & Malik, A. (2023). Work-from-home (WFH) during COVID-19 pandemic–A netnographic investigation using Twitter data. Information Technology & People, 36(5), 2161–2186.10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0020Search in Google Scholar

Daraba, D., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., & Faisal, M. (2021). Working from home during the corona pandemic: Investigating the role of authentic leadership, psychological capital, and gender on employee performance. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1885573.10.1080/23311975.2021.1885573Search in Google Scholar

De Clercq, D., & Brieger, S. A. (2021). When discrimination is worse, autonomy is key: How women entrepreneurs leverage job autonomy resources to find work–life balance. Journal of Business Ethics, 177, 665–682.10.1007/s10551-021-04735-1Search in Google Scholar

De Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28–46.10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898Search in Google Scholar

Diego-Medrano, E., & Salazar, L. R. (2021). Examining the work-life balance of faculty in higher education. International Journal of Social Policy and Education, 20(5), 71–83.Search in Google Scholar

Drumm, S., Bradley, C., & Moriarty, F. (2022). ‘More of an art than a science’? The development, design and mechanics of the Delphi Technique. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(1), 2230–2236.10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.027Search in Google Scholar

Durugbo, C. M., Al-Balushi, Z., Anouze, A., & Amoudi, O. (2020). Critical indices and model of uncertainty perception for regional supply chains: Insights from a Delphi-based study. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(5), 549–564.10.1108/SCM-10-2019-0373Search in Google Scholar

El Said, G. R. (2021). How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect higher education learning experience? An empirical investigation of learners’ academic performance at a university in a developing country. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2021, 1–10.10.1155/2021/6649524Search in Google Scholar

Eze, E. C., Sofolahan, O., & Omoboye, O. G. (2023). Assessment of barriers to the adoption of sustainable building materials (SBM) in the construction industry of a developing country. Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment, 3(3), 153–166.10.1108/FEBE-07-2022-0029Search in Google Scholar

Farmer, D. (2020). Teacher attrition: The impacts of stress. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 87(1), 41–50.Search in Google Scholar

Feng, T. (2019, January 7). Law of the People’s Republic of China on Higher Education. Chinese Dawang. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/201901/9df07167324c4a34bf6c44700fafa753.shtml.Search in Google Scholar

Feng, Z., & Savani, K. (2020). Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: Implications for dual-career parents working from home. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(7/8), 719–736.10.1108/GM-07-2020-0202Search in Google Scholar

Fink-Hafner, D., Dagen, T., Doušak, M., Novak, M., & Hafner-Fink, M. (2019). Delphi method: Strengths and weaknesses. Advances in Methodology and Statistics, 16(2), 1–19.10.51936/fcfm6982Search in Google Scholar

Foy, T., Dwyer, R. J., Nafarrete, R., Hammoud, M. S. S., & Rockett, P. (2019). Managing job performance, social support and work-life conflict to reduce workplace stress. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(6), 1018–1041.10.1108/IJPPM-03-2017-0061Search in Google Scholar

Gandhi, M., & Sen, K. (2021). Missing women in Indian university leadership: Barriers and facilitators. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 352–369.10.1177/1741143219896048Search in Google Scholar

Gull, N., Asghar, M., Bashir, M., Liu, X., & Xiong, Z. (2023). Does a family-supportive supervisor reduce the effect of work-family conflict on emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions? A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 34(2), 253–272.10.1108/IJCMA-03-2022-0046Search in Google Scholar

Guy, B., & Arthur, B. (2020). Academic motherhood during COVID-19: Navigating our dual roles as educators and mothers. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(5), 887–899.10.1111/gwao.12493Search in Google Scholar

Han, D., Kalantari, M., & Rajabifard, A. (2023). Identifying and prioritizing sustainability indicators for China’s assessing demolition waste management using modified Delphi–analytic hierarchy process method. Waste Management & Research. 41(11), 1649–1660.10.1177/0734242X231166309Search in Google Scholar

Hartman, R. L., & Barber, E. G. (2020). Women in the workforce: The effect of gender on occupational self-efficacy, work engagement, and career aspirations. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(1), 92–118.10.1108/GM-04-2019-0062Search in Google Scholar

Heras Recuero, L., & Osca Segovia, A. (2021). El conflicto entre el trabajo y la familia, las estrategias de afrontamiento y el agotamiento: Análisis de género y pareja. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 37(1), 21–28.Search in Google Scholar

Hirschi, A., Zacher, H., & Shockley, K. M. (2022). Whole-life career self-management: A conceptual framework. Journal of Career Development, 49(2), 344–362.10.1177/0894845320957729Search in Google Scholar

Huo, M. L., & Jiang, Z. (2023). Work-role overload, work-life conflict, and perceived career plateau: The moderating role of emotional stability. Human Resource Management, 62(6), 867–882.10.1002/hrm.22167Search in Google Scholar

Ingley, C., Singh, S., & Malkani, A. (2020). Teasing out fieldwork challenges with e-mail methods in cross-border research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(3), 402–418.10.1108/QROM-02-2017-1490Search in Google Scholar

Jacob, O. N., Jegede, D., & Musa, A. (2021). Problems facing academic staff of Nigerian universities and the way forward. International Journal on Integrated Education, 4(1), 230–241.Search in Google Scholar

Jahan, S. (2022). Challenges to female college principals and vice principals: Patriarchal gender beliefs in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432221115521.10.1177/17411432221115521Search in Google Scholar

Jain, K., Jain, A., & Bansal, A. (2023). Investigating demographic characteristics and work-life balance of the teachers of University of Delhi. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 28(3), 301–320.10.1504/IJICBM.2023.129726Search in Google Scholar

Jais, J., & Suat, T. A. (2022). Examining the impact of work-life culture on employee engagement in Malaysian universities. Global Business & Management Research, 14(3), 789–802.Search in Google Scholar

Jandhyala, R. (2020). Delphi, non-RAND modified Delphi, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method and a novel group awareness and consensus methodology for consensus measurement: A systematic literature review. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 36(11), 1873–1887.10.1080/03007995.2020.1816946Search in Google Scholar

Jolly, P. M., Kong, D. T., & Kim, K. Y. (2021). Social support at work: An integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(2), 229–251.10.1002/job.2485Search in Google Scholar

Kara, S. B. K., Günes, D. Z., & Tüysüzer, B. S. (2021). Work-family conflict during working from home due to pandemic: A qualitative research on female teachers. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(1), 251–273.Search in Google Scholar

Karakose, T., Yirci, R., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Exploring the interrelationship between COVID-19 phobia, work-family conflict, family-work conflict, and life satisfaction among school managers for advancing sustainable management. Sustainability, 13(15), 8654.10.3390/su13158654Search in Google Scholar

Kaur, W., Balakrishnan, V., Chen, Y. Y., & Periasamy, J. (2022). Mental health risk factors and coping strategies among students in Asia Pacific during COVID-19 pandemic—A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 8894.10.3390/ijerph19158894Search in Google Scholar

Kaveladze, B. T., Wasil, A. R., Bunyi, J. B., Ramirez, V., & Schueller, S. M. (2022). User experience, engagement, and popularity in mental health apps: Secondary analysis of app analytics and expert app reviews. JMIR Human Factors, 9(1), e30766.10.2196/30766Search in Google Scholar

Khan, R. U., Salamzadeh, Y., Shah, S. Z. A., & Hussain, M. (2021). Factors affecting women entrepreneurs’ success: A study of small-and medium-sized enterprises in the emerging market of Pakistan. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1–21.10.1186/s13731-021-00145-9Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. B. (2023, January 11). My country’s higher education has entered the stage of popularization. People Daily. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s5147/202301/t20230111_1038961.html.Search in Google Scholar

Kruse, S. D., Hackmann, D. G., & Lindle, J. C. (2020, December). Academic leadership during a pandemic: Department heads leading with a focus on equity. Frontiers in Education, 5, 614641.10.3389/feduc.2020.614641Search in Google Scholar

Larsson, G., & Alvinius, A. (2020). Comparison within gender and between female and male leaders in female-dominated, male-dominated and mixed-gender work environments. Journal of Gender Studies, 29(7), 739–750.10.1080/09589236.2019.1638233Search in Google Scholar

Lee, M., Coutts, R., Fielden, J., Hutchinson, M., Lakeman, R., Mathisen, B., … Phillips, N. (2022). Occupational stress in University academics in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(1), 57–71.10.1080/1360080X.2021.1934246Search in Google Scholar

Li, X. (2020). Fathers’ involvement in Chinese societies: Increasing presence, uneven progress. Child Development Perspectives, 14(3), 150–156.10.1111/cdep.12375Search in Google Scholar

Lippert, T. H. (2019). NATO, climate change, and international security: A risk governance approach. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-14560-6Search in Google Scholar

Liu, R., Liu, J., Jiao, C., He, Z., & Liu, J. (2023). Design and application of a methodology for assessing the strength of female leadership in Chinese literary works. Order, 5(4), 103–110.10.25236/FSST.2023.050417Search in Google Scholar

Livingston, K. M. (2023). Exploring the emotional and mental challenges and occupational and domestic support for remote working women university instructional design professionals: A phenomenological study using social exchange theory. (Doctoral dissertation). Kansas, United States: Baker University.Search in Google Scholar

Love, S. M., & Marshall, D. T. (2022). Teacher experiences during COVID-19. In D.T. Marshall (Ed.), COVID-19 and the classroom: How schools navigated the great disruption (pp. 21–65). Maryland, United States: Lexington Books.10.22230/ijepl.2023v19n1a1257Search in Google Scholar

Loziak, A., Fedáková, D., & Čopková, R. (2020). Work-related stressors of female teachers during COVID-19 school closure. Journal of Women’s Entrepreneurship and Education, (3–4), 59–78.10.28934/jwee20.34.pp59-78Search in Google Scholar

Luna, C. A. (2022). Her story: How the lifelong stories of women leaders in higher education facilitate understanding of their identities, leadership, and conceptualizations of power. (Doctoral dissertation). California State University, Fresno.Search in Google Scholar

Lyu, X., & Fan, Y. (2020). Research on the relationship of work family conflict, work engagement and job crafting: A gender perspective. Current Psychology, 41, 1767–1777.10.1007/s12144-020-00705-4Search in Google Scholar

Magnusson, C. (2021). Flexible time–but is the time owned? Family-friendly and family-unfriendly work arrangements, occupational gender composition, and wages: A test of the mother-friendly job hypothesis in Sweden. Community, Work & Family, 24(3), 291–314.10.1080/13668803.2019.1697644Search in Google Scholar

Maher, A. N. (2022). The career experiences of women support staff in higher education with advanced degrees. (Doctoral dissertation). Ohio, United States: Kent State University.Search in Google Scholar

Maheshwari, G. (2021). A review of literature on women’s leadership in higher education in developed countries and in Vietnam: Barriers and enablers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(5), 1067–1086.10.1177/17411432211021418Search in Google Scholar

Makura, A. H. (2022). South African female academics’ work from home experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 5(1), 13–22.10.46303/jcve.2022.3Search in Google Scholar

Marques, V. C., & Berry, G. R. (2021). Enhancing work-life balance using a resilience framework. Business and Society Review, 126(3), 263–281.10.1111/basr.12237Search in Google Scholar

Mathews, M. M., Khumalo, N., & Dlamini, B. I. (2022). Roots and causes of occupational stress amongst female academics in universities of technology in South Africa. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(7), 1–37.10.5430/ijhe.v11n7p37Search in Google Scholar

Mavin, S., & Yusupova, M. (2021). Competition and gender: Time’s up on essentialist knowledge production. Management Learning, 52(1), 86–108.10.1177/1350507620950176Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Education. (2022, May 17). Historic achievements, pattern changes-- The results of the reform and development of higher education in the past ten years. Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education. http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2022/54453/sfcl/202205/t20220517_627973.html.Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Education. (2023, March 23). Basic situation of National Education Development in 2022. Department of Development and Planning, Ministry of Education. http://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2023/55167/sfcl/202303/t20230323_1052203.html.Search in Google Scholar

Mitsuyama, T., Son, D., Eto, M., & Kikukawa, M. (2023). Competency lists for urban general practitioners/family physicians using the modified Delphi method. BMC Primary Care, 24(1), 1–13.10.1186/s12875-023-01984-zSearch in Google Scholar

Mohd Noor, N., Rasli, A., Abdul Rashid, M. A., Mubarak, M. F., & Abas, I. H. (2022). Ranking of corporate governance dimensions: A Delphi study. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 173.10.3390/admsci12040173Search in Google Scholar

Mok, K. H., & Marginson, S. (2021). Massification, diversification and internationalisation of higher education in China: Critical reflections of developments in the last two decades. International Journal of Educational Development, 84, 102405.10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102405Search in Google Scholar

Mubarak, N., Hatah, E., Aris, M. A. M., Shafie, A. A., & Zin, C. S. (2019). Consensus among healthcare stakeholders on a collaborative medication therapy management model for chronic diseases in Malaysia: A Delphi study. PloS one, 14(5), e0216563.10.1371/journal.pone.0216563Search in Google Scholar

Mulawarman, W. G., & Komariyah, L. (2021). Women and leadership style in school management: A study of gender perspective. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 594–611.10.18844/cjes.v16i2.5638Search in Google Scholar

Neumann, D., Tiberius, V., & Biendarra, F. (2022). Adopting wearables to customize health insurance contributions: A ranking-type Delphi. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22(1), 1–7.10.1186/s12911-022-01851-4Search in Google Scholar

Noda, H. (2020). Work-life balance and life satisfaction in OECD countries: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(4), 1325–1348.10.1007/s10902-019-00131-9Search in Google Scholar

Oakman, J., Kinsman, N., Graham, M., Stuckey, R., & Weale, V. (2022). Strategies to manage working from home during the pandemic: The employee experience. Industrial Health, 60(4), 319–333.10.2486/indhealth.2022-0042Search in Google Scholar

O’Connell, C., & McKinnon, M. (2021). Perceptions of barriers to career progression for academic women in STEM. Societies, 11(2), 27.10.3390/soc11020027Search in Google Scholar

Offermann, L. R., & Foley, K. (2020). Is there a female leadership advantage? Oxford research encyclopedia of business and management.10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.61Search in Google Scholar

Olsen, A. A., Wolcott, M. D., Haines, S. T., Janke, K. K., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2021). How to use the Delphi method to aid in decision making and build consensus in pharmacy education. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 13(10), 1376–1385.10.1016/j.cptl.2021.07.018Search in Google Scholar

Oludayo, A. O., & Omonijo, D. O. (2020). Work-life balance: Relevance of social support. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Park, S. M., & Park-Ozee, D. (2020). Gendered divisions of labor in the twenty-first-century academy: Research, teaching, and service. In The Wiley handbook of gender equity in higher education (pp. 375–395). New Jersey, United States: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119257639.ch19Search in Google Scholar

Pekkala, K., & van Zoonen, W. (2022). Work-related social media use: The mediating role of social media communication self-efficacy. European Management Journal, 40(1), 67–76.10.1016/j.emj.2021.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Poggesi, S., Mari, M., & De Vita, L. (2019). Women entrepreneurs and work-family conflict: An analysis of the antecedents. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 431–454.10.1007/s11365-017-0484-1Search in Google Scholar

Pongruengkiat, W., Tippayawong, K. Y., Aggarangsi, P., Pichayapan, P., Katongtung, T., & Tippayawong, N. (2023). Applying Delphi method to develop sustainable city indexes. TeMA-Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 16(1), 165–182.Search in Google Scholar

Posselt, J., Hernandez, T. E., Villarreal, C. D., Rodgers, A. J., & Irwin, L. N. (2020). Evaluation and decision making in higher education: Toward equitable repertoires of faculty practice. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 35, 1–63.10.1007/978-3-030-11743-6_8-1Search in Google Scholar

Purwanto, A. (2020). The effect of work-family conflict on job satisfaction and performance: A study of Indonesian female employees. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 6724–6748.Search in Google Scholar

Qureshi, S. A., Naseem, A., & Ahmad, Y. (2023). Outsourcing or in-house manufacturing in Hi-tech industry: Supply chain process with Delphi-AHP approach. Kybernetes.10.1108/K-08-2022-1172Search in Google Scholar

Rawal, D. M. (2023). Work life balance among female school teachers [k-12] delivering online curriculum in Noida [India] during COVID: Empirical study. Management in Education, 37(1), 37–45.10.1177/0892020621994303Search in Google Scholar

Ren, X., & Caudle, D. J. (2020). Balancing academia and family life: The gendered strains and struggles between the UK and China compared. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(2), 141–165.10.1108/GM-06-2019-0093Search in Google Scholar

Restrepo, J., & Lemos, M. (2021). Addressing psychosocial work-related stress interventions: A systematic review. Work, 70(1), 53–62.10.3233/WOR-213577Search in Google Scholar

Revez, A., Dunphy, N., Harris, C., Mullally, G., Lennon, B., & Gaffney, C. (2020). Beyond forecasting: Using a modified Delphi method to build upon participatory action research in developing principles for a just and inclusive energy transition. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920903218.10.1177/1609406920903218Search in Google Scholar

Romiani, U., Abili, K., Pourkaremi, J., & Farahbakhsh, S. (2021). Designing a talent-based model for recruiting faculty members at Iranian regional comprehensive universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(3), 668–683.10.1108/IJEM-03-2020-0129Search in Google Scholar

Roy, A., & Mishra, M. (2022). Exacerbated digital education divide and the marginalized: Experiences from India. In Economic and societal transformation in pandemic-trapped India: Emerging challenges and resilient policy prescriptions (pp. 139–172). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.10.1007/978-981-16-5755-9_7Search in Google Scholar

Ruan, J., Cai, Y., & Stensaker, B. (2023). University managers or institutional leaders? An exploration of top-level leadership in Chinese universities. Higher Education, 87, 703–719.10.1007/s10734-023-01031-xSearch in Google Scholar

Rutledge, L. B. (2020). Leveling up: Women academic librarians’ career progression in management positions. College & Research Libraries, 81(7), 1143.10.5860/crl.81.7.1143Search in Google Scholar

Saadat Hashimi, S. (2021). Factors impacting work-life balance of female employees in private higher education institutions in Afghanistan: An exploration. Kardan Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 4(3), 84–99.10.31841/KJEMS.2021.101Search in Google Scholar

Saihi, A., Ben-Daya, M., & As’ ad, R. (2023). Underpinning success factors of maintenance digital transformation: A hybrid reactive Delphi approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 255, 108701.10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108701Search in Google Scholar

Schmalz, U., Spinler, S., & Ringbeck, J. (2021). Lessons learned from a two-round Delphi-based scenario study. MethodsX, 8, 101179.10.1016/j.mex.2020.101179Search in Google Scholar

Shekhar, N. (2021). Revisioning Educational Leadership: Is there a role for the “female” advantage? IBA Journal of Management & Leadership, 13(1), 19-2021.Search in Google Scholar

Soh, E., & Martens, K. (2022). Value dimensions of autonomous vehicle implementation through the Ethical Delphi. Cities, 127, 103741.10.1016/j.cities.2022.103741Search in Google Scholar

Soomro, A. H., Shaikh, A. S., Parveen, S., Jalbani, S. M., Qazi, M. A., & Khan, R. (2023). Key position achievements by female academics in higher educational institutions: A case study of the private universities of Karachi. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(3), 1149–1165.Search in Google Scholar

Sultana, U. S., Abdullah, N. E. T. M., Mok, E. T., Hossain, J., Sherief, S. R., Iskandar, M. L., & Andalib, T. W. (2021). Exploring Motivation and commitment on job satisfaction and employee performance in Work from Home (WFH) perspective. Psychology and Education, 58(3), 2411–2424.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, P., Zhou, X., Shao, C., Wang, W., & Sun, J. (2022). The impacts of environmental dynamism on Chinese tour guides’ sustainable performance: Factors related to vitality, positive stress mindset and supportive policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15), 9289.10.3390/ijerph19159289Search in Google Scholar

Tamunomiebi, M. D., & Oyibo, C. (2020). Work-life balance and employee performance: A literature review. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(2), 1–10.10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.2.196Search in Google Scholar

Tang, C., Ma, H., Naumann, S. E., & Xing, Z. (2020). Perceived work uncertainty and creativity during the covid-19 pandemic: The roles of Zhongyong and creative self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 596232.10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596232Search in Google Scholar

Tang, L., & Horta, H. (2021). Women academics in Chinese universities: A historical perspective. Higher Education, 82, 865–895.10.1007/s10734-020-00669-1Search in Google Scholar

Tee, M., Rasli, A., Toh, J. S. S. K., Abas, I. H., Zhou, F., & Liew, C. S. (2022). A Delphi method on the positive impact of COVID-19 on higher education institutions: Perceptions of academics from Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1013974.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013974Search in Google Scholar

Tsegay, S. M., Ashraf, M. A., Perveen, S., & Zegergish, M. Z. (2022). Online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic: Teachers’ experiences from a Chinese university. Sustainability, 14(1), 568.10.3390/su14010568Search in Google Scholar

Uddin, M. (2021). Addressing work-life balance challenges of working women during COVID-19 in Bangladesh. International Social Science Journal, 71(239–240), 7–20.10.1111/issj.12267Search in Google Scholar

Vican, S., Friedman, A., & Andreasen, R. (2020). Metrics, money, and managerialism: Faculty experiences of competing logics in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(1), 139–164.10.1080/00221546.2019.1615332Search in Google Scholar

Walters, C., Mehl, G. G., Piraino, P., Jansen, J. D., & Kriger, S. (2022). The impact of the pandemic-enforced lockdown on the scholarly productivity of women academics in South Africa. Research Policy, 51(1), 104403.10.1016/j.respol.2021.104403Search in Google Scholar

Wei, C., & Ye, J. H. (2022, November). The impacts of work-life balance on the emotional exhaustion and well-being of college teachers in China. Healthcare, 10(11), 2234.10.3390/healthcare10112234Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, E., Saner, F., Asrani, S. K., Biancofiore, G., Blasi, A., Lerut, J., … Francoz, C. (2021). When is a critically ill cirrhotic patient too sick to transplant? Development of consensus criteria by a multidisciplinary panel of 35 international experts. Transplantation, 105(3), 561–568.10.1097/TP.0000000000003364Search in Google Scholar

Wong, K. P., Lee, F. C. H., Teh, P. L., & Chan, A. H. S. (2021). The interplay of socioecological determinants of work-life balance, subjective wellbeing and employee wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4525.10.3390/ijerph18094525Search in Google Scholar

Wood, J., Oh, J., Park, J., & Kim, W. (2020). The relationship between work engagement and work-life balance in organizations: A review of the empirical research. Human Resource Development Review, 19(3), 240–262.10.1177/1534484320917560Search in Google Scholar

Wood, S. (2022). Job demands and well-being in universities in the pandemic: A longitudinal study. Industrial Relations Journal, 53(4), 336–367.10.1111/irj.12376Search in Google Scholar

Wu, J., Zhang, L., Zhu, X., & Jiang, G. (2021). Mental health literacy from the perspective of multi-field experts in the context of Chinese culture. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(4), 1387.10.3390/ijerph18041387Search in Google Scholar

Wut, T. M., & Xu, J. (2021). Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of COVID-19: A social presence theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3), 371–383.10.1007/s12564-021-09673-1Search in Google Scholar

Yang, F. F. (2022, January 4). Education Observation丨Comprehensive Beyond! In education, women are getting stronger!. China Education Online. https://news.eol.cn/yaowen/202201/t20220104_2199309.shtml.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, R. (2020). Political culture and higher education governance in Chinese societies: Some reflections. Frontiers of Education in China, 15, 187–221.10.1007/s11516-020-0010-zSearch in Google Scholar

Yavorsky, J. E., Qian, Y., & Sargent, A. C. (2021). The gendered pandemic: The implications of COVID‐19 for work and family. Sociology Compass, 15(6), e12881.10.1111/soc4.12881Search in Google Scholar

Zahid, A. (2021). The role of paternalistic leadership in innovative performance: Mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) and moderating role of power distance. (Doctoral dissertation). Islamabad, Pakistan: Capital University of Science & Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Moeckel, R., Moreno, A. T., Shuai, B., & Gao, J. (2020). A work-life conflict perspective on telework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 141, 51–68.10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, G., Zhou, X., & Zhou, G. (2019). Improving the quality evaluation system of higher education. In Education Policy and Reform in China (pp. 81–91). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-981-13-6492-1_7Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-08-25
Revised: 2023-10-12
Accepted: 2024-01-01
Published Online: 2024-03-26

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Issue: Building Bridges in STEAM Education in the 21st Century - Part II
  2. The Flipped Classroom Optimized Through Gamification and Team-Based Learning
  3. Method and New Doctorate Graduates in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics of the European Innovation Scoreboard as a Measure of Innovation Management in Subdisciplines of Management and Quality Studies
  4. Impact of Gamified Problem Sheets in Seppo on Self-Regulation Skills
  5. Special Issue: Disruptive Innovations in Education - Part I
  6. School-Based Education Program to Solve Bullying Cases in Primary Schools
  7. The Project Trauma-Informed Practice for Workers in Public Service Settings: New Strategies for the Same Old Objective
  8. Regular Articles
  9. Limits of Metacognitive Prompts for Confidence Judgments in an Interactive Learning Environment
  10. “Why are These Problems Still Unresolved?” Those Pending Problems, and Neglected Contradictions in Online Classroom in the Post-COVID-19 Era
  11. Potential Elitism in Selection to Bilingual Studies: A Case Study in Higher Education
  12. Predicting Time to Graduation of Open University Students: An Educational Data Mining Study
  13. Risks in Identifying Gifted Students in Mathematics: Case Studies
  14. Technology Integration in Teacher Education Practices in Two Southern African Universities
  15. Comparing Emergency Remote Learning with Traditional Learning in Primary Education: Primary School Student Perspectives
  16. Pedagogical Technologies and Cognitive Development in Secondary Education
  17. Sense of Belonging as a Predictor of Intentions to Drop Out Among Black and White Distance Learning Students at a South African University
  18. Gender Sensitivity of Teacher Education Curricula in the Republic of Croatia
  19. A Case Study of Biology Teaching Practices in Croatian Primary Schools
  20. The Impact of “Scratch” on Student Engagement and Academic Performance in Primary Schools
  21. Examining the Structural Relationships Between Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Intention to Teach and Perceptions of the Nature of Science and Attitudes
  22. Validation of the Undesirable Behavior Strategies Questionnaire: Physical Educators’ Strategies within the Classroom Ecology
  23. Economics Education, Decision-Making, and Entrepreneurial Intention: A Mediation Analysis of Financial Literacy
  24. Deconstructing Teacher Engagement Techniques for Pre-service Teachers through Explicitly Teaching and Applying “Noticing” in Video Observations
  25. Influencing Factors of Work–Life Balance Among Female Managers in Chinese Higher Education Institutions: A Delphi Study
  26. Examining the Interrelationships Among Curiosity, Creativity, and Academic Motivation Using Students in High Schools: A Multivariate Analysis Approach
  27. Teaching Research Methodologies in Education: Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices in Portugal
  28. Normrank Correlations for Testing Associations and for Use in Latent Variable Models
  29. The More, the Merrier; the More Ideas, the Better Feeling”: Examining the Role of Creativity in Regulating Emotions among EFL Teachers
  30. Principals’ Demographic Qualities and the Misuse of School Material Capital in Secondary Schools
  31. Enhancing DevOps Engineering Education Through System-Based Learning Approach
  32. Uncertain Causality Analysis of Critical Success Factors of Special Education Mathematics Teaching
  33. Novel Totto-Chan by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi: A Study of Philosophy of Progressivism and Humanism and Relevance to the Merdeka Curriculum in Indonesia
  34. Global Education and Critical Thinking: A Necessary Symbiosis to Educate for Critical Global Citizenship
  35. The Mediating Effect of Optimism and Resourcefulness on the Relationship between Hardiness and Cyber Delinquent Among Adolescent Students
  36. Enhancing Social Skills Development in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Evaluation of the “Power of Camp Inclusion” Program
  37. The Influence of Student Learning, Student Expectation and Quality of Instructor on Student Perceived Satisfaction and Student Academic Performance: Under Online, Hybrid and Physical Classrooms
  38. Household Size and Access to Education in Rural Burundi: The Case of Mutaho Commune
  39. The Impact of the Madrasati Platform Experience on Acquiring Mathematical Concepts and Improving Learning Motivation from the Point of View of Mathematics Teachers
  40. The Ideal Path: Acquiring Education and Gaining Respect for Parents from the Perspective of Arab-Bedouin Students
  41. Exploring Mentor Teachers’ Experiences and Practices in Japan: Formative Intervention for Self-Directed Development of Novice Teachers
  42. Research Trends and Patterns on Emotional Intelligence in Education: A Bibliometric and Knowledge Mapping During 2012–2021
  43. Openness to Change and Academic Freedom in Jordanian Universities
  44. Digital Methods to Promote Inclusive and Effective Learning in Schools: A Mixed Methods Research Study
  45. Translation Competence in Translator Training Programs at Saudi Universities: Empirical Study
  46. Self-directed Learning Behavior among Communication Arts Students in a HyFlex Learning Environment at a Government University in Thailand
  47. Unveiling Connections between Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and Delinquency Proneness: Analysing the General Strain Theory
  48. The Expression of Gratitude in English and Arabic Doctoral Dissertation Acknowledgements
  49. Subtexts of Most Read Articles on Social Sciences Citation Index: Trends in Educational Issues
  50. Experiences of Adult Learners Engaged in Blended Learning beyond COVID-19 in Ghana
  51. The Influence of STEM-Based Digital Learning on 6C Skills of Elementary School Students
  52. Gender and Family Stereotypes in a Photograph: Research Using the Eye-Tracking Method
  53. ChatGPT in Teaching Linear Algebra: Strides Forward, Steps to Go
  54. Partnership Quality, Student’s Satisfaction, and Loyalty: A Study at Higher Education Legal Entities in Indonesia
  55. SEA’s Science Teacher Voices Through the Modified World Café
  56. Construction of Entrepreneurship Coaching Index: Based on a Survey of Art Design Students in Higher Vocational Colleges in Guangdong, China
  57. The Effect of Audio-Assisted Reading on Incidental Learning of Present Perfect by EFL Learners
  58. Comprehensive Approach to Training English Communicative Competence in Chemistry
  59. The Collaboration of Teaching at The Right Level Approach with Problem-Based Learning Model
  60. Effectiveness of a Pop-Up Story-Based Program for Developing Environmental Awareness and Sustainability Concepts among First-Grade Elementary Students
  61. Effect of Computer Simulation Integrated with Jigsaw Learning Strategy on Students’ Attitudes towards Learning Chemistry
  62. Unveiling the Distinctive Impact of Vocational Schools Link and Match Collaboration with Industries for Holistic Workforce Readiness
  63. Students’ Perceptions of PBL Usefulness
  64. Assessing the Outcomes of Digital Soil Science Curricula for Agricultural Undergraduates in the Global South
  65. The Relationship between Epistemological Beliefs and Assessment Conceptions among Pre-Service Teachers
  66. Review Articles
  67. Fostering Creativity in Higher Education Institution: A Systematic Review (2018–2022)
  68. The Effects of Online Continuing Education for Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Scoping Review
  69. The Impact of Job Satisfaction on Teacher Mental Health: A Call to Action for Educational Policymakers
  70. Developing Multilingual Competence in Future Educators: Approaches, Challenges, and Best Practices
  71. Using Virtual Reality to Enhance Twenty-First-Century Skills in Elementary School Students: A Systematic Literature Review
  72. State-of-the-Art of STEAM Education in Science Classrooms: A Systematic Literature Review
  73. Integration of Project-Based Learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics to Improve Students’ Biology Practical Skills in Higher Education: A Systematic Review
  74. Teaching Work and Inequality in Argentina: Heterogeneity and Dynamism in Educational Research
  75. Case Study
  76. Teachers’ Perceptions of a Chatbot’s Role in School-based Professional Learning
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/edu-2022-0213/html
Scroll to top button