Home Localized dissolution of grain boundary T1 precipitates in Al-3Cu-2Li
Article Publicly Available

Localized dissolution of grain boundary T1 precipitates in Al-3Cu-2Li

  • Ramasis Goswami

    Goswami is a scientist with the Multifunctional Materials Branch of the Division of Materials Science and Technology at Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, USA. He obtained his Bachelor Degree in Metallurgical Engineering form Bengal Engineering College and Science University, Shibpur, India. He then earned his Master’s and PhD degrees in Materials Engineering from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. Dr. Goswami is a recipient of the Alexander von Humboldt fellowship. His current areas of research include the study of dislocation structures ahead of the crack tip, the microstructure and property relationship in metals, alloys and multilayered thin films, and interfaces and defectsin semiconducting thin films. He has published over 85 peer-reviewed articles in scientific literature.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 26, 2015

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed to investigate the dissolution behavior of nanocrystalline grain boundary T1 precipitates in Al-3Cu-2Li. These grain boundary T1 plates exhibit an orientation relation with matrix, with the (1-11)α-Al parallel to (0001)T1 and [022]α-Al parallel to [10-10]T1, which is similar to the orientation relationship of T1 plates formed within grains. TEM studies showed that these grain boundary T1 plates react readily in moist air. As a result of the localized dissolution, the Cu-rich clusters form onto T1, which is consistent with the localized dissolution behavior observed in nanocrystalline S phase in Al-Cu-Mg.

1 Introduction

Many Al alloys, such as Al-2xxx and Al-8xxx alloys, exhibit brittle intergranular fracture and low fracture toughness. Considerable research efforts have been made to investigate the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Li alloys with high lithium contents (>2 wt%) that are prone to exhibit brittle intergranular fracture (Lynch, Wanhill, Byrnes, & Bray, 2014; Rioja & Lie, 2012). There are still unresolved questions about which factors are important in controlling fracture behavior. Several factors have been proposed to explain the brittle intergranular fracture exhibited by Al alloys, particularly with high-Li-content Al alloys, such as the (i) presence of grain boundary precipitates (GBPs) and precipitate free zones (PFZs) (Vasudevan & Doherty, 1987), (ii) impurity segregation and phases at grain boundaries (Liddicoat, Liao, & Ringer, 2009; Lynch, Muddle, & Pasang, 2001, 2002; Valiev, Murashkin, Yu, Kazykhanov, & Sauvage, 2010), and (iii) planar slip producing high stress concentration at grain boundaries (Blankenship & Strake, 1993; Eswara Prasad, Kamat, Prasad, Malakondaiah, & Kutumbarao, 1993; Noble, Harris, & Dinsdale, 1982; Sanders & Starke, 1982; Starke, Sanders, & Palmer, 1981). Recently, it has been suggested that the Li segregation at grain boundaries is mostly responsible for brittle intergranular fracture as it weakens the interatomic bonds (Lynch et al., 2001, 2002, 2014). However, no direct evidence on Li segregation has been obtained in Al-Li alloys.

It has recently been shown that the GBPs and PFZs are mostly responsible for determining the fracture mode (Lynch et al., 2014). The specific roles of PFZs and GBPs in determining the fracture behavior, particularly in Al-Li alloys, with and without corrosive environment are not well understood. We recently correlated the fracture behavior of Al-3Cu-2Li with the grain boundary T1/matrix interface characteristics using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and density functional theory simulations and demonstrated that the delamination is most likely to take place at the GBP/matrix interfaces as these interfaces have lower decohesion energies and the fracture is most likely to take place at the non-coherent grain boundary T1/matrix interface (Goswami & Bernstein, 2015).

In addition to low fracture toughness exhibited by Al-Cu-Li alloys, a number of phases have been shown to influence the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) as well as intergranular corrosion behavior. These phases are T1, T2, and TB, and among all phases, it has been reported that the anodic nature of T1 is primary cause for SCC susceptibility (Padgett, 2008). Although considerable experimental efforts have been made to study the electrochemical or the dissolution behavior of T1 (Padgett, 2008; Warner & Gangloff, 2012) and Al2CuMg plates (S phase) in Al-Cu-Mg alloys (Birbilis, Cavanaugh, Kovarik, & Buchheit, 2008; Buchheit, Hlava, McKenzie, & Zender, 1997; Buchheit, Montes, Martinez, Michael, & Hlava, 1999) in NaCl water environment, few investigations have focused on the study of the localized dissolution of T1 at grain boundaries in aqueous environment or in the presence of moist air at the nanoscale regime. Here, we report the dissolution of grain boundary T1 at the nanoscale regime using TEM and show that these grain boundary T1 plates react readily in moist air. The reaction starts almost in the middle of the plate by selective dissolution, which resulted in the formation of a considerable amount Cu in the form of elongated nanoparticles onto T1 plates.

2 Materials and methods

Plates of commercial Al-3Cu-2Li alloy were solution treated at 550°C for 1 h and quenched in cold water, and then aged at 190°C for 2, 4, 12, 40, and 150 h. An increase in Vickers hardness was observed as a result of precipitation up to approximately 40 h of aging, and then a decrease with further aging. The mean Vickers hardness values in as-quenched, underaged (4 h), peak-aged (40 h), and overaged (150 h) conditions are 70, 150, 190, and 140, respectively. JEOL 2200 (JEM-2200FS, JEOL Ltd., Japan) analytical transmission electron microscope operating at 200 KeV was used to characterize the microstructure of Al-3Cu-2Li as a function of aging. TEM samples were prepared initially by mechanically polishing to a thickness of approximately 50 μm and finally by thinning in an ion mill with a gun voltage of 4 kV and a sputtering angle of 10° in the temperature range of -40 to -50°C to prevent any nucleation and growth of precipitate during milling. Fine probe energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was employed to determine the distribution of Cu and Al. We used high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) and high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) imaging to investigate the localized dissolution behavior of grain boundary T1. HAADF was carried out with a camera length of 50 cm.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Nucleation and growth of T1 plates within grains and at grain boundaries

We briefly describe the nucleation and growth of T1 within a grain as the nature of T1 plates and their interfacial characteristics within grains are related to the grain boundary T1 precipitates. It has been suggested that the nucleation of T1 occurs by the dissociation of matrix dislocation into partials (Cassada, Shiflet, & Starke, 1991; Howe, Lee, & Vasudevan, 1988), as the c-axis spacing of T1 is 4 times the (111) spacing of Al. It was argued that the nucleation is related to the movements of 1/6 <112> partial dislocations, which transform the fcc stacking to hexagonal stacking. Thus, two partial dislocations are needed to form a T1 unit cell. However, we have observed that the T1 precipitates within a grain nucleate via the Guinier-Preston (GP) zone formation. Figure 1 is a HRTEM image close to the [011] zone showing the early stage of T1 plates, indicated by arrows, formed along the {111} planes. The fast Fourier transform (FFT), obtained from the matrix containing a number of such platelets, shows diffuse streaks developed along the 111 directions (see inset of Figure 1). These platelets do not have the lattice spacing of one unit cell of T1 phase in the 111 direction of the matrix, suggesting that the nucleation of T1 plate takes place via GP zones. The T1 phase has a hexagonal lattice with a=0.496 nm and c=0.935 nm. Smaalen, Meetsma, DeBoer, and Bronsveld (1990) proposed using the X-ray structure refinement technique that the structure contains several corrugated layers and does not have stacking of four hexagonal layers with a spacing of 0.233 nm. Recently, a TEM-based HAADF imaging (Donnadieu et al., 2011; Dwyer, Weyland, Chang, & Muddle, 2011) showed that the T1 structure is more complex, and along the c-axis, nine layers were observed. As the structure contains several corrugated layers and does not have the stacking of four hexagonal layers with a spacing of 0.233 nm, the nucleation of the T1 phase cannot be explained by the dissociation of matrix dislocations. Based on our TEM observations, we conclude that T1 forms by thermal fluctuation in the solid state via GP zone formation.

Figure 1: 
						HRTEM image close to the [011] zone showing the early stage of T1 plates formed along the {111} planes. Inset shows FFT of the outlined box in the main image.
Figure 1:

HRTEM image close to the [011] zone showing the early stage of T1 plates formed along the {111} planes. Inset shows FFT of the outlined box in the main image.

With continued aging, T1 plates lengthen on the {111} habit planes to a significant extent, from 100 nm to approximately 1000 nm. As both the broad faces of the T1 plate are coherent with the matrix, it thickens with ledge growth mechanism at a lower rate as compared to the rate of lengthening, which is consistent with previously reported observations (Dorin, Deschamps, Geuser, & Sigli, 2014; Howe et al., 1988). Figure 2A is a bright field TEM image for sample aged for 40 h showing the considerably long T1 plates close to the [011] zone. In addition to T1 plates, we observe θ′ and δ′ plates. The corresponding diffraction pattern obtained from a number of T1, θ′, and δ′ precipitates in the α-Al matrix is presented in Figure 2B. The δ′ is not readily visible in the bright field because of the high contrast. The diffuse streaks in the diffraction pattern along the [111] direction are due to T1 plates, and diffraction spots can be seen from δ′. In addition to T1, θ′, and δ′ precipitates, a lath-like phase could be observed, and the diffraction spots of this phase are indicated by white circles.

Figure 2: 
						(A) Bright-field TEM image showing the T1 plates, θ′ plates, and δ′ dots close to the [011] zone. Two variants of T1 are indicated by arrows. (B) The corresponding diffraction pattern close to the [011] matrix zone obtained from a number of T1, θ′, and δ′ precipitates in the matrix.
Figure 2:

(A) Bright-field TEM image showing the T1 plates, θ′ plates, and δ′ dots close to the [011] zone. Two variants of T1 are indicated by arrows. (B) The corresponding diffraction pattern close to the [011] matrix zone obtained from a number of T1, θ′, and δ′ precipitates in the matrix.

While the T1 plates grow along the {111} habit planes within a grain with both broad faces parallel to the {111} planes of the matrix, such conditions are not easily satisfied for the growth of T1 at grain boundaries. Most grain boundaries were observed to be faceted or serrated upon aging even for 2 h as a result of the formation of plate-like T1 precipitate at the boundary. TEM observations, presented later, showed that such serrated portion consists of {111} segments at one side of the boundary, suggesting that the habit plane criterion is met mostly at one side of the broad face of the T1 plate. Such grain boundary configuration would decrease over all free energy as the serrated portion consists of {111} segments. As the grain boundary serration is associated with the formation of T1 plates at grain boundaries, it was observed in aged sample only. Figure 3A shows the faceted appearance of the grain boundary after 4 h of aging. We also confirmed the grain boundary faceting with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) imaging as shown in Figure 3B. The area fraction or coverage was estimated by measuring the length of T1 plates at the boundary over the total length of grain boundaries. The area fraction was obtained from SEM images of approximately 20 grain boundaries containing T1 plate. The area fraction or coverage of grain boundary T1 plates as a function of aging was shown in Figure 3C. It was observed that the area fraction saturates after 40 h of aging. At underaged conditions, it is considerably high and increases with subsequent aging. The area fraction, for example, after 4 h of aging is 65%, and at 150 h, the area fraction is more than 80%. Recently, in situ small-angle X-ray scattering was used by Dorin, Deschamps, Geuser, Lefebvre, and Sigli (2014) to measure the evolution of mean thickness of T1 within grains. They also employed differential scanning calorimetric measurements to study the evolution of volume fraction of T1 plates within grains. However, this type of study is not suitable to measure the volume or area fraction of grain boundary T1.

Figure 3: 
						(A) SEM image showing faceted grain boundary containing T1 plates. (B) An EBSD image showing the faceted grain boundaries. The orientation triangle is shown as an inset. (C) Grain boundary coverage of T1 as a function of aging.
Figure 3:

(A) SEM image showing faceted grain boundary containing T1 plates. (B) An EBSD image showing the faceted grain boundaries. The orientation triangle is shown as an inset. (C) Grain boundary coverage of T1 as a function of aging.

TEM analysis of precipitates at grain boundaries showed that the GBPs at underaged, peak-aged, and overaged conditions are mostly hexagonal T1 plates. The grain boundary T1 plates are considerably thicker than the T1 plates within the grain (Figure 4A). As these grain boundary T1 plates grow along {111} habit planes at one side of the grain boundary, it shows orientation relation with one side of the matrix grain. Figure 4B is the HRTEM image showing the orientation relation that the (1-11)α-Al is parallel to (0001)T1 and [022]α-Al is parallel to [10-10]T1, which is similar to that of the T1 plates formed within the grain. A probable formation sequence of T1 plates at grain boundaries with aging, as shown schematically in Figure 4C, involves nucleation and growth of T1 precipitates along the grain boundary with the {111} habit planes by continuously readjusting the grain boundary location. The continuous adjustment of grain boundary during the growth of T1 requires grain boundary migration. Similar grain boundary precipitation behavior of γ′ precipitate has been reported in Al-Ag system (Clark, 1967).

Figure 4: 
						(A) A bright field TEM image showing the grain boundary T1. (B) HRTEM of grain boundary T1 plate showing the orientation relation with the matrix. (C) A schematic diagram showing the mechanism of faceting at grain boundaries as a result of grain boundary precipitation.
Figure 4:

(A) A bright field TEM image showing the grain boundary T1. (B) HRTEM of grain boundary T1 plate showing the orientation relation with the matrix. (C) A schematic diagram showing the mechanism of faceting at grain boundaries as a result of grain boundary precipitation.

3.2 Localized dissolution of grain boundary T1 in moist air

As these Al2CuLi precipitates are anodic relative to the surrounding Al solid solution matrix, they get preferentially dissolved during localized corrosion. Here, we are interested to know whether the localized reaction occurs at the T1/matrix interface or within the T1 phase in the presence of moisture. The localized dissolution behavior of micron- and nano-sized S phase within grains in Al-Cu-Mg alloys has been studied in water+NaCl environment (Birbilis et al., 2008; Buchheit et al., 1997, 1999). It was observed that the dissolution of S phase is associated with dealloying of Mg and Al, and such a dissolution process leaves behind Cu as remnant (Birbilis et al., 2008). In order to investigate the dissolution or reaction behavior at the nanoscale level, TEM samples were exposed to air for a couple of hours. The grain boundary T1 phase of the TEM foil will have greater chance to come in contact with moisture, and a number of such grain boundary T1 were observed to study the behavior. Figure 5 is the HRTEM image of grain boundary T1 showing the localized reacted regions, indicated by arrows. As a result of this localized reaction, the (0001) lattice planes of T1 have been destroyed in these regions.

Figure 5: 
						HRTEM image showing the localized reaction at different regions of grain boundary T1.
Figure 5:

HRTEM image showing the localized reaction at different regions of grain boundary T1.

To further investigate the localized dissolution process, we used HAADF imaging. In this imaging mode, the scattering cross-section is approximately proportional to the square of atomic number (Z). The Cu-rich regions will appear bright as compared to the Al-matrix. Figure 6 is the HAADF image of a grain boundary T1 phase, which appears bright due to its higher Cu content as compared to the matrix. The localized dissolution of the T1 at grain boundary can be observed mostly in the middle of the T1. An elongated hole in the middle of grain boundary T1 could be observed, suggesting that materials from that region have been completely dissolved. As a result of the dissolution, the Cu-rich clusters in form of platelets, which appear brighter as compared to T1, form onto T1. This is consistent with the localized dissolution behavior of nanocrystalline S phase in Al-Cu-Mg (Birbilis, 2008). We also observed considerable reaction of T1 with moisture (Figure 7) after 40 h of aging. Note the area fraction of grain boundary T1; at 40 h, the area fraction is approximately 80% (see Figure 3C).

Figure 6: 
						HAADF image showing the localized dissolution of grain boundary T1. It leaves behind Cu/Cu-rich nanoparticles.
Figure 6:

HAADF image showing the localized dissolution of grain boundary T1. It leaves behind Cu/Cu-rich nanoparticles.

Figure 7: 
						An optical image showing the extent of reaction at grain boundaries for the sample aged for 40 h. The sample was polished and kept in the laboratory air for more than 12 h.
Figure 7:

An optical image showing the extent of reaction at grain boundaries for the sample aged for 40 h. The sample was polished and kept in the laboratory air for more than 12 h.

4 Summary

In summary, TEM was employed to investigate the formation and dissolution behavior of grain boundary T1 precipitates in Al-3Cu-2Li. These grain boundary T1 plates exhibit an orientation relation with the matrix, with the (1-11)α-Al parallel to (0001)T1 and [022]α-Al parallel to [10-10]T1, which is similar to the orientation relationship of T1 plates formed within grains. The habit plane and orientation relation criteria were met mostly at one side of the broad face of the grain boundary T1 plate. Most grain boundaries were observed to be faceted upon aging as a result of the formation of plate like T1 precipitate. The faceted portion consists of {111} segments at one side of the boundary. A probable formation sequence of T1 plates at grain boundaries with aging involves nucleation and growth of T1 precipitates along the grain boundary with the {111} habit planes by continuously readjusting the grain boundary location. HRTEM and HAADF studies showed that these grain boundary T1 plates react readily in moist air. As a result of the localized dissolution, the Cu-rich platelets form onto T1, which is consistent with the localized dissolution behavior observed in nanocrystalline S phase in Al-Cu-Mg.


Corresponding author: Ramasis Goswami, Naval Research Laboratory, Multifunctional Materials, Materials Science and Technology Division, Washington, DC 20375, USA, e-mail:

About the author

Ramasis Goswami

Goswami is a scientist with the Multifunctional Materials Branch of the Division of Materials Science and Technology at Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC, USA. He obtained his Bachelor Degree in Metallurgical Engineering form Bengal Engineering College and Science University, Shibpur, India. He then earned his Master’s and PhD degrees in Materials Engineering from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. Dr. Goswami is a recipient of the Alexander von Humboldt fellowship. His current areas of research include the study of dislocation structures ahead of the crack tip, the microstructure and property relationship in metals, alloys and multilayered thin films, and interfaces and defectsin semiconducting thin films. He has published over 85 peer-reviewed articles in scientific literature.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) through the Naval Research Laboratory’s 6.1 Research Program. I would like to thank Dr. L. Kabacoff, ONR, for funding under contract N0001414WX00826. Special thanks are due to Dr. A.K. Vasudevan for providing technical guidance to this study.

References

Birbilis N, Cavanaugh MK, Kovarik L, Buchheit RG. Nano-scale dissolution phenomenon in Al-Cu-Mg alloys. Electrochem Commun 2008; 10: 32–37.10.1016/j.elecom.2007.10.032Search in Google Scholar

Blankenship CP Jr, Strake EA Jr. Mechanical behavior of double-aged AA8090. Metall Trans A 1993; 24: 833–841.10.1007/BF02656504Search in Google Scholar

Buchheit RG, Hlava PF, McKenzie B, Zender G. Local dissolution phenomena associated with S phase (Al2CuMg) particles in aluminum alloy 2024-T3. J Electrochem Soc 1997; 144: 2621–2628.10.1149/1.1837874Search in Google Scholar

Buchheit RG, Montes LP, Martinez MA, Michael J, Hlava PF. The electrochemical characteristics of bulk-synthesized Al2CuMg. J Electrochem Soc 1999; 146: 4424–4428.10.1149/1.1392654Search in Google Scholar

Cassada WA, Shiflet GJ, Starke EA Jr. Mechanism of Al2CuLi (T1) nucleation and growth. Metall Trans A 1991; 22: 287–297.10.1007/BF02656798Search in Google Scholar

Clark JB. Effects of grain boundary structure on precipitate morphology in Al-18w% Ag – an application of high temperature electron microscopy. In: Aaronson HI, editor. High temperature, high resolution metallography. London, UK: Gordon & Breach, 1967: 347–375.Search in Google Scholar

Donnadieu P, Shao Y, Geuser FD, Botton GA, Lazar S, Cheynet M, Biossieu MD, Deschamps A. Atomic structure of T1 precipitates in Al-Li-Cu alloys revisited with HAADF-STEM imaging and small-angle x-ray scattering. Acta Mater 2011; 59: 462–472.10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.044Search in Google Scholar

Dorin T, Deschamps A, Geuser FD, Sigli C. Quantification and modeling of the microstructure/strength relationship be tailoring the morphological parameters of the T1 phase in an Al-Cu-Li alloy. Acta Mater 2014; 75: 134–146.10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.046Search in Google Scholar

Dorin T, Deschamps A, Geuser FD, Lefebvre W, Sigli C. Quantitative description of the T1 formation kinetics in an Al-Cu-Li alloy using differential scanning calorimetry, small-angle x-ray scattering and transmission electron microscopy. Philos Mag 2014; 94: 1012–1030.10.1080/14786435.2013.878047Search in Google Scholar

Dwyer C, Weyland M, Chang LY, Muddle BC. Combined electron beam imaging and ab initio modeling of T1 precipitates in Al-Li-Cu alloys. Appl Phys Lett 2011; 98: 201909.10.1063/1.3590171Search in Google Scholar

Eswara Prasad N, Kamat SV, Prasad KS, Malakondaiah G, Kutumbarao VV. In-plane anisotropy in the fracture toughness of an Al-Li 8090 alloy plate. Eng Fract Mech 1993; 46: 209–233.10.1016/0013-7944(93)90282-WSearch in Google Scholar

Goswami R, Bernstein N. Effect of interfaces of grain boundary Al2CuLi plates on fracture behavior of Al-3Cu-2Li. Acta Mater 2015; 87: 399–410.10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.025Search in Google Scholar

Howe JM, Lee J, Vasudevan AK. Structure and deformation behavior of T1 precipitate plates in an Al-2Li-1Cu alloy. Met Mater Trans A 1988; 19: 2911–2920.10.1007/BF02647717Search in Google Scholar

Liddicoat PV, Liao XZ, Ringer SP. Novel grain boundary solute architecture in a nanostructured ultra-high strength 7075 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Forum 2009; 618: 543–546.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.618-619.543Search in Google Scholar

Lynch SP, Muddle BC, Pasang T. Ductile-to-brittle fracture transitions in 8090 Al-Li alloys. Acta Mater 2001; 49: 2863–2874.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00217-8Search in Google Scholar

Lynch SP, Muddle BC, Pasang T. Mechanisms of brittle intergranular fracture in Al-Li alloys and comparisons with other alloys. Phil Mag A 2002; 482: 3361–3373.10.1080/01418610210128122Search in Google Scholar

Lynch SP, Wanhill RJH, Byrnes RT, Bray GH. Fracture toughness and fracture modes of aerospace aluminum-lithium alloys. In: Eswara Prasad N, Gokhale A, Wanhill RJH, editors. Aluminum-lithium alloys: processing, properties and applications. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2014: 415–455.10.1016/B978-0-12-401698-9.00013-6Search in Google Scholar

Noble B, Harris SJ, Dinsdale K. Microstructure stability of binary Al-Li alloys at low temperatures. Met Sci 1982; 16: 425–430.10.1179/030634582790427523Search in Google Scholar

Padgett BN. Investigation into stress corrosion cracking properties of AA2099, an Al-Cu-Li alloy. PhD Thesis, The Ohio State University, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Rioja RJ, Lie J. Evolution of Al-Li base products for aerospace and space applications. Metall Mater Trans A 2012; 43A: 3325–3337.10.1007/s11661-012-1155-zSearch in Google Scholar

Sanders TH Jr, Starke EA Jr. The effect of slip distribution on the monotonic and cyclic ductility of Al-Li binary alloys. Acta Metall 1982; 30: 927–939.10.1016/0001-6160(82)90199-7Search in Google Scholar

Smaalen SV, Meetsma A, DeBoer JL, Bronsveld PM. Refinement of the crystal structure of hexagonal Al2CuLi. J Solid State Chem 1990; 85: 293–298.10.1016/S0022-4596(05)80086-6Search in Google Scholar

Starke EA Jr, Sanders TH Jr, Palmer IG. New approaches to alloy development in the Al-Li system. J Met 1981; 33: 24–33.10.1007/BF03339468Search in Google Scholar

Valiev RZ, Murashkin NA, Yu M, Kazykhanov VU, Sauvage X. On the origin of the extremely high strength of ultrafine-grained Al alloys produced by severe plastic deformation. Scripta Mater 2010; 63: 949–952.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.07.014Search in Google Scholar

Vasudevan AK, Doherty RD. Grain boundary ductile fracture in precipitation hardened aluminum alloys. Acta Metall 1987; 35: 1193–1218.10.1016/0001-6160(87)90001-0Search in Google Scholar

Warner JS, Gangloff RP. Alloy induced inhibition of fatigue crack growth in age-hardenable Al-Cu alloys. Int J Fatigue 2012; 42: 35–44.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.04.013Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-12-08
Accepted: 2015-06-11
Published Online: 2015-08-26
Published in Print: 2015-11-01

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Editorial
  4. International Symposium on Environmental Damage Under Static and Cyclic Loads in Structural Metallic Materials at Ambient Temperatures III (Bergamo, Italy, June 15–20, 2014)
  5. Overviews and reviews
  6. U.S. Naval Aviation: operational airframe experience with combined environmental and mechanical loading
  7. Thirty-five years in environmentally assisted cracking in Italy: a point of view
  8. Fatigue and corrosion fatigue
  9. Transgranular corrosion fatigue crack growth in age-hardened Al-Zn-Mg (-Cu) alloys
  10. Effect of cyclic frequency on fracture mode transitions during corrosion fatigue cracking of an Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy
  11. Crack growth behavior of 4340 steel under corrosion and corrosion fatigue conditions
  12. Modeling of environmentally assisted fatigue crack growth behavior
  13. Factors influencing embrittlement and environmental fracture
  14. Pre-exposure embrittlement of an Al-Cu-Mg alloy, AA2024-T351
  15. Electrochemical approach to repassivation kinetics of Al alloys: gaining insight into environmentally assisted cracking
  16. Localized dissolution of grain boundary T1 precipitates in Al-3Cu-2Li
  17. Grain boundary anodic phases affecting environmental damage
  18. Defect tolerance under environmentally assisted cracking conditions
  19. Role of Mo/V carbides in hydrogen embrittlement of tempered martensitic steel
  20. Stress corrosion cracking
  21. The role of crack branching in stress corrosion cracking of aluminium alloys
  22. An atomistically informed energy-based theory of environmentally assisted failure
  23. Discrete dislocation modeling of stress corrosion cracking in an iron
  24. Quasi-static behavior of notched Ti-6Al-4V specimens in water-methanol solution
  25. Role of excessive vacancies in transgranular stress corrosion cracking of pure copper
  26. Multiscale investigation of stress-corrosion crack propagation mechanisms in oxide glasses
  27. Hydrogen assisted cracking
  28. Hydrogen effects on fracture of high-strength steels with different micro-alloying
  29. Environmentally assisted cracking and hydrogen diffusion in traditional and high-strength pipeline steels
  30. Multiscale thermodynamic analysis on hydrogen-induced intergranular cracking in an alloy steel with segregated solutes
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/corrrev-2015-0032/html
Scroll to top button